<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Polity: Labour and the Greens in a tree...</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Johnson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361879#post361879</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361879#post361879</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yep, the key word here is "suffer". People are suffering. </p><p>Who took the hit for the GE?. The poor. There are sizable chunks of the electorate who felt nothing from it's bust up , ironically the classes most associated with the banking programmes that caused the collapse.</p><p> What did John…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2016 09:59:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361878#post361878</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361878#post361878</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>United fact…</strong><br /><q>gentlemen …. of ego and stagnation. </q><br />At least they never get enough party votes to bring more of their ilk into Parliament, it would be good to get rid of both of them, and also to woo the Maori Party away from the Overlords, they can’t see a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2016 09:45:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Johnson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361876#post361876</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361876#post361876</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Labour and Greens are natural coalition partners in any reasonable persons eyes except the weird world of a handful of primetime political pundits who love promoting scraps that don't exist in order to look personally dynamic.</p><p>New Zealand First carries the potential of taking both major parties over the line…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2016 09:07:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361862#post361862</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361862#post361862</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hilarious! And dead on, too. One wonders if we should launch an organised Trotters for Tea campaign (T for termination) and get someone reputable and mainstream on the media- Sue Bradford, Jane Kelsey and Nicky Hager come to mind immediately.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2016 10:57:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361844#post361844</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361844#post361844</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>How does that happen? </q></p><p>Trotter has a great gift for sonorous puff. A bit like the kind of potboiler stuff that Maurice Shadbolt once turned out for coffee table books, with a dash of <em>Desiderata</em>, so that you're tickled into feeling that you've exercised your fine mind by having read…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 23:44:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361840#post361840</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361840#post361840</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>However, the problem is that he's lodged there as a pustule while silencing real, practical and informed left political commentary.</q></p><p>How does that happen?  Is he just good mates with the editors and broadcasters, and someone they know they can get cheaply and easily on short notice about any issue…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 22:38:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361801#post361801</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361801#post361801</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I agree with your excellent analysis of Trots, Marc. However, the problem is that he's lodged there as a pustule while silencing real, practical and informed  left political commentary. He needs to be lanced.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 11:27:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361795#post361795</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361795#post361795</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I suppose what really annoyed me was that he seemed so reasonable in comparison, but in the end has was just "not as bad as other Nats".</q></p><p>With that I would not disagree.  My view is that he actually took an active interest in taking responsibility for the portfolio with…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 22:23:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Marc C</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361792#post361792</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361792#post361792</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Re Mr Trotter, he is in my view nothing but a reflective, history loving, part time academic political romanticist, who shows no clear line and ideas that he may have of his own, he is these days fulfilling the role of "commentator" on TV current affairs (at times), on Radio…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 16:42:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Marc C</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361791#post361791</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361791#post361791</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						When Paul Henry started with Mediaworks, after his failed roles in Australia, first having his late night Paul Henry Show, now having his Paul Henry Breakfast show, I thought, any person going on there, to talk about anything political &ndash; or for that sake anything sensible, would risk ending in…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 16:20:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361775#post361775</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361775#post361775</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>As much as it is about values of solidarity and equality, it needs to be about pragmatism.</q></p><p>Which reads to me as a great aphorism for despising those outside of the party system as political amateurs. It's Labour's isolation through contempt for that part of the potential electrorate that's driven…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 11:18:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361772#post361772</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361772#post361772</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						You're absolutely right. Chris Trotter's main claim to fame is that he wrote a book about NZ trade unionism. Admittedly, it's a very good one, but he has never had prolonged involvement with any major New Zealand political party. He is totally clueless about new social movements outside the union…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 10:53:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361771#post361771</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361771#post361771</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Chris Trotter.....Go away.</q><br />Congratulations on getting that out without once using the word Chardonnay.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 10:50:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361770#post361770</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361770#post361770</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						There is a difference between good sense and authentic popular democratic political initiatives and  "common sense" nostrums, cliches, prejudices and authoritarian populist attacks on civil liberties and human rights.  Remember Gramsci? The "popular will" can be progressive, or it can be deeply reactionary. Sometimes, on different issues, it is both.…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 10:48:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361769#post361769</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361769#post361769</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Chris Trotter is a defeatist in the classic dictionary definition of the word. His unfailing willingness to accept the inevitability of defeat taints his commentary. The guy never got over the Rogernomics betrayal. We get it. Time for less aging white guys pining for the welfare state of their youth…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 10:47:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361767#post361767</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361767#post361767</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Josie is at least practical...</q><br />Practical in the sense of strategically gaming the system to thwart the popular will, in the grand tradition of Michael Bassett and Tony Blair. I'm less than convinced of the "practicality" of, for example, her <a href="http://pundit.co.nz/content/opponents-of-the-tpp-have-been-vague-about-their-alternative" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">"get in behind the TPP you ungrateful bastards" schtick.</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 10:28:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361765#post361765</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361765#post361765</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But that would have made no difference whatever to the number of Labour or Green MPs, which is entirely determined by the party vote.</q><br /><a href="http://www.elections.org.nz/voting-system/mmp-voting-system" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.elections.org.nz/voting-system/mmp-voting-system</a><br />aaah I see &ndash; all the electorate MPs are part of the 'party vote percentage' and the 'List MPs' comprise of any shortfall in electorates…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 10:20:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361764#post361764</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361764#post361764</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Josie is at least practical, although I don't always agree with her. Trottersky isn't.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 10:15:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361762#post361762</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361762#post361762</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Why can't Trotter bother to educate himself about actual red/green coalitions and why does the media keep to running to him as a 'left' political commentator?</q></p><p>Agreed, though isn't it more than a touch ironic to be making that point in the allocated blogpatch of [[http://pundit.co.nz/content/leftie-strategerizing|one of Josie Pagani's most…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 10:01:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361761#post361761</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361761#post361761</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						For the coalition &mdash; though not for Labour alone, which means they probably won't do it &mdash; it would make strategic sense for Labour to chase electorate votes while Greens chase party votes, thus creating overhang.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 10:01:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361758#post361758</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361758#post361758</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And now it begins. TV3's Paul Henry (what a surprise) brings on failed National Party strategist Michelle Boag and Mr Flakey Loose Wheel "Leftist" Chris Trotter:</p><p><a href="http://www.newshub.co.nz/politics/boag-and-trotter-agree-labour-is-probably-doomed-2016060109#axzz4AMnlEk8e" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.newshub.co.nz/politics/boag-and-trotter-agree-labour-is-probably-doomed-2016060109#axzz4AMnlEk8e</a></p><p>Why can't Trotter bother to educate himself about actual red/green coalitions and why does the media keep to running to him as a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 09:52:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361757#post361757</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361757#post361757</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yes, it only helps where there is an overhang.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 09:48:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361756#post361756</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361756#post361756</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>[a Green withdrawal] would have gained Chchch Central for [Labour] last election</q></p><p>But that would have made no difference whatever to the number of Labour or Green MPs, which is entirely determined by the party vote.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 09:45:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361755#post361755</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361755#post361755</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						What would the part of government tasked with monitoring project risk across all departments know about that anyway, <a href="http://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/news/politics/its-the-usual-sort-of-rubbish-brownlee-launches-another-attack-on-treasury/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">blusters bumbling Brownlee</a>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 09:45:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361751#post361751</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361751#post361751</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>..and let's face it National just doesn't give a toss anymore it seems.<br />They tweeted from the embargoed Budget lock up &ndash; 3 and a half hours before it was allowed<br /><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/80592318/treasury-to-call-on-national-party-budget-breachers-to-please-explain" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/80592318/treasury-to-call-on-national-party-budget-breachers-to-please-explain</a></p><p>Gerry and the Placemakers have shouted down any questions about the last minute changes to the stated 'purpose'…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 08:58:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361748#post361748</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361748#post361748</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>volcanic pique…</strong><br /><q>Mt Roskill by-election;</q><br />Labour’s Goff (18,637) had 8,000+ votes over National’s candidate (10,546) last election, while the Greens only had 1,682 votes (and John Minto had 300) &ndash; the whole Right / Conservative bloc (including NZF) still only totals 12, 357<br /><a href="http://www.electionresults.govt.nz/electionresults_2014/electorate-28.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.electionresults.govt.nz/electionresults_2014/electorate-28.html</a><br />As long as Labour picks a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 07:45:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Seriatim</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361746#post361746</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361746#post361746</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It's brilliant they're officially collaborating; about time. All that joined-up talent will make a vibrant bunch, with everyone more space to concentrate on their specialties; and such a relief to know at last that a vote for either is a vote to get rid of the Nats, with no danger…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 00:51:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361745#post361745</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361745#post361745</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Well, I just read Clare Trevetts piece and that is such a catatonically neoliberal framing that I can only imagine that her head is so far up the arse of the political establishment she spends most of her day wondering why they haven’t privatised tonsils yet.</p><p>The idea that the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 23:05:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Pattison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361743#post361743</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361743#post361743</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Interesting how nobody's talking about the Mt Roskill by-election; which I presume is where the first round of this MOU is going to play out. Are Labour and the Greens going to coordinate and only going to put forward one left candidate?</p><p>Had everybody forgotten about that?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 21:41:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alfie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361742#post361742</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361742#post361742</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>...<br />Threatening<br />EstablishedOrder<br />And <em>(hopefully)</em><br />Sinking<br />Incumbent<br />Neoliberal<br />Government<br />!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 21:38:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361741#post361741</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361741#post361741</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Keenly<br />Indicating<br />Social<br />Service<br />In<br />New<br />Government<br />?</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 21:31:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361740#post361740</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361740#post361740</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>“Labour and Greens up a tree”….</q><br />…<br />Keenly <br />Indicating <br />Social <br />Service  <br />In <br />New <br />Government<br />?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 20:41:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alfie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361739#post361739</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361739#post361739</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It’s the shallow end of journalism... Patrick Gower’s brilliant at it...</q></p><p>Sure enough. Paddy's big story tonight was about the "first row" between the two parties. He asked Meteria Turei if the public "would get to see what a joint government would look like before the election?" </p><p>She said __"Yes.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 20:05:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Telfar Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361737#post361737</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361737#post361737</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Shouldn't the title be "Labour and Greens <em>up</em> a tree"? Or is that one of those regional difference things?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 19:49:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361736#post361736</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361736#post361736</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I've said it before, but Labour's <a href="http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/249530/labour-to-create-ict-apprenticeships" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">digital apprenticeships policy</a> is a potential deal-maker for me personally, since it could be the one thing that gets me out of the dead-end cycle. So if Labour needs to stand for only one thing, it's extending the "ladder of opportunity" for those who…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 18:17:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hilary Stace</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361735#post361735</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361735#post361735</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						ECan
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 17:49:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361734#post361734</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361734#post361734</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What in particular do you dislike about Nick Smith in Conservation?</q></p><p>Purely based on his responses to personal communications, I got the impression that he was quite unwilling to spend political capital on DoC issues (or maybe he didn't have enough clout to achieve much). There was no way he…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 17:25:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361731#post361731</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361731#post361731</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>he couldn't be much worse than Nick Smith as Minister for conservation</q></p><p>What in particular do you dislike about Nick Smith in Conservation?</p><p>I'd much prefer an alternative government, but from the options available and from what I saw of him, Nick Smith  actually took a strong interest in it…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 16:27:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alfie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361726#post361726</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361726#post361726</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Everyone knows they’re natural bedfellows anyway...</q></p><p>David Cunliffe <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/10526624/David-Cunliffe-admits-mistake-over-Greens" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">admitted as much</a> after losing the 2014 election.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 15:43:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361723#post361723</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361723#post361723</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Jeez, if they committed solidly to something bold (that would be criticised!) like UBI I’d probably join the Labour Party.</q></p><p>If they committed to a UBI I would probably join too. Until then, I'll probably continue to vote Green. We are in the middle of a poverty crisis, and only…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 15:35:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361722#post361722</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361722#post361722</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>... and Steffan Browning as minister of science?????</q></p><p>for all that I despise the nonsense that individual spouts, I'm kinda tempted by the view that he couldn't be much worse than Nick Smith as Minister for conservation or Pullya Benefit as Minister of Social Welfare. It might almost be a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 15:29:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361721#post361721</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361721#post361721</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I’m really looking forward to seeing Kevin Hague as a Minister of Health and Julie Anne Genter as a Minister of Transport</q></p><p>... and Steffan Browning as minister of science?????</p><p>Sorry but it had to be said.</p><p>There are significant issues in this coalition. I agree with the two you…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 15:21:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361718#post361718</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361718#post361718</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>his redirection of the science budget to multinationals </q></p><p>That isn't true of this budget.</p><p>Marsden (pure science) got +12 million per year (added to the current 53 million they have). So that's quite a big step up.</p><p>MBIE bidding is influenced by "benefit to NZ" but they have taken a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 15:15:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361717#post361717</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361717#post361717</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And it doesn't mean anything until we see one party concede policy to the other and/or both assert who from either party will speak for portfolios</q></p><p>They have agreed who gets Finance. That should head off some of the wild squawking from righties about not wanting the Greens anywhere near…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 15:02:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alfie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361716#post361716</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361716#post361716</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>...that man makes me so mad.</q></p><p>Is that because of his pompous demeanor, his redirection of the science budget to multinationals and friends of the National party, or the total disregard for democracy he shares with his cabinet colleagues?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 14:34:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361715#post361715</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361715#post361715</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Bachelor analogy (on TV news last night) while not referencing or crediting it</q><br />whoops, I got that wrong he does allude to it <br />&ndash; hmm, maybe I'm frothing a wee bit too... <br />that man makes me so mad.<br />:- (</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 14:09:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361714#post361714</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361714#post361714</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If the Greens/Labour chose to run a single candidate and won a National-held electorate, they’d just get an electorate MP rather than a list one.</q><br />You miss my point – by having one Labour candidate and no Green candidate to dilute or spread the vote it might push a Labour…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 14:06:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361713#post361713</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361713#post361713</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Soper box rants...</strong><br />Bloody hell &ndash; Barry Soper is almost frothing at the mouth as he tries to pack as much vitriol into his diatribe / column today:<br /><a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=11648756" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=11648756</a><br />he gets so worked up basic english escapes him:<br /><q>But Little and Metiria Turei, both lawyers in a previous life, he for…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 13:31:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Fen Tex</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361712#post361712</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361712#post361712</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The first is about timing – this is the right time...</q></p><p>I disagree. The time for this was years ago and the bad blood between Labour and the Greens has been an example of  Labour incompetence and inability to form a government in the MMP environment.</p><p>And it doesn't mean…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 13:31:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361711#post361711</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361711#post361711</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>One does wonder if there will be Epsom &amp; Ohariu-like candidate ‘withdrawal’ and instructions to voters re MP and Party vote in some areas?</q></p><p>That only works with micro-parties having a single electorate MP (e.g Epsom and Ohariu) where National get extra MPs because Dunne &amp; Seymour don't come off their party…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 13:23:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sam Bradford</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361709#post361709</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361709#post361709</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						yes, but... Labour used to put on this charade of 'we won't need the Greens', in fact they preferred pissing on them to attacking National, which strikes me as grievously counterproductive. This might, _might_ help energise Left voters a little. I agree re: policy; Labour haven't lost the centre because…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 12:14:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Howard Edwards</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361708#post361708</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361708#post361708</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>+1</p><p>Or more correctly</p><p>1+(1+(1+(1+ ....)) .....)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 12:01:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361706#post361706</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361706#post361706</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Except that for the last three elections it has always been clear that Labour couldn't govern without The Greens.</p><p>Everyone knew this.</p><p>Yet despite everyone knowing it was Labour/Green vs National the public still voted National ... Or more accurately the Labour/Green voters chose not to vote leaving the National…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 11:33:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sam Bradford</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361705#post361705</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361705#post361705</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Voters should be pleased with this.</p><p>This is how it should work. You cast your vote for Labour or Greens, knowing that they'll have different priorities and your vote will affect the relative weighting of those priorities. But Labour can fuck this up, as they have in the past, by…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 10:59:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361704#post361704</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361704#post361704</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It’s basically a press release for National.</q></p><p>like i say, auditioning.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 10:45:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361703#post361703</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361703#post361703</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And finally, here are my references:</p><p>Charles Lees: The Red/Green Coalition in Germany: Politics, Personalities and Power: Manchester: Palgrave: 2000.</p><p>Werner Reutter: Germany on the Road to Normalcy: Politics and Policies of the Red/Green Federal Government: 1998-2002Manchester: Palgrave: 2004</p><p>Franko Zelko and Caroline Brinkman: Green Parties: Reflections on the First…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 10:35:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361702#post361702</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361702#post361702</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>So, what about factoring in NZF? </p><p>What about 'traffic light coalitions' that might conceivably include Labour, the Greens and New Zealand First? These have existed overseas. In particularly, the Czech Republic may offer some interesting insights into how this might unfold. Rather like New Zealand First, the Czech Peoples Party…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 10:33:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361701#post361701</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361701#post361701</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Here's something I wrote back in 2015 about a possible Labour/Green coalition back then before Cunliffe's cockup: </p><p> In Germany, Social Democrat Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder led a successful and effective Social Democrat/Green coalition (1998-2005) for two Bundestag terms. In Finland, Social Democrat Prime Minister Paavo Lipponen's government included Cabinet minister representation…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 10:30:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361699#post361699</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361699#post361699</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>like this, you mean? Trevett manages to make it about her pin-up PM. Longest job interview ..</q></p><p>Yes, pretty much.  It's the shallow end of journalism which only ever frames politics as sport. Instead of investigating and reporting with substance, it commentates on every single development in terms of strategy,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 09:22:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Johnson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361698#post361698</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361698#post361698</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Trevett just wrote one of the most pointless articles I have ever seen . It’s basically a press release for National.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 09:08:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361697#post361697</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361697#post361697</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the Greens might also need to take stock</q><br />Vote rustlers?</p><p>One does wonder if there will be Epsom &amp; Ohariu-like candidate 'withdrawal' and instructions to voters re MP and Party vote in some areas?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 09:04:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361696#post361696</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361696#post361696</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Hepatic cat...</strong><br /><q>employing a form of divination that us effete liberals would find too offal to contemplate</q><br />Entrailer trash...<br />...or Liver birds?<br />;-  )</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 09:00:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361693#post361693</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361693#post361693</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Hear 'em, scare 'em...</strong><br /><q>meta-commentary about political gamesmanship<br />...like this, you mean? </q><br />It's a bit rich Trevett pointing a mocking finger at <em>"Little's Big Love government" </em> when National is in bed with 3 parties already...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 08:47:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alfie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361692#post361692</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361692#post361692</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Is it really the right time, when Labour have with recent changes of position (Auckland housing, dropping CGT, dropping GST exemption for certain foods, ambiguous talk about a UBI, and so forth), and a very unclear policy direction (no clear words on tax reform), and nobody really knowing that well…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 08:40:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361691#post361691</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361691#post361691</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>ongoing meta-commentary about political gamesmanship</q></p><p><a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=11648247" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">like this</a>, you mean? Trevett manages to make it about her pin-up PM. Longest job interview ..</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 08:05:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361690#post361690</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361690#post361690</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Your polling figures declaring that the left is finally on the rise could be taken from anytime with in the last 10 years. Ten years when National have relentlessly thumped the left. I don't think National will be panicking just yet.<br /></q></p><p>I agree.  Trying to extrapolate the future based on…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 22:58:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361689#post361689</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361689#post361689</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I doubt many of us would be surprised. Opinions welcome.</q><br />For all I know Marc C may be a trained <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haruspex" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">haruspex</a>, employing a form of divination that us effete liberals would find too offal to contemplate.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 22:20:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361688#post361688</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361688#post361688</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>I see an election outcome few here will expect, where NZ First may rise to be the strong and vocal opposition party, which may gain favour and support from former, disgruntled National voters and former Labour voters rushing to them, and putting it at perhaps 15 or more percent in…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 21:39:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Marc C</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361687#post361687</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361687#post361687</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						So, while I welcome this step, at long last, to have a kind of MOU between Labour and Greens, I have very mixed feelings about the present situation. Is it really the right time, when Labour have with recent changes of position (Auckland housing, dropping CGT, dropping GST exemption for…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 21:06:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Art Croft</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361682#post361682</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361682#post361682</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Your polling figures declaring that the left is finally on the rise could be taken from anytime with in the last 10 years. Ten years when National have relentlessly thumped the left. I don't think National will be panicking just yet. </p><p>Plus the MOU isn't worth the paper its printed…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 19:10:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361677#post361677</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361677#post361677</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>That research provides evidence that parties who cooperate before an election, rather than campaign completely independently, ultimately are more likely to win government. That’s a pretty good reason to formalize things.</q></p><p>So who in Labour decided to do the opposite before the 2014 election?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 18:05:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361676#post361676</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-labour-and-the-greens-in-a-tree/?p=361676#post361676</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 18:05:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
