<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Polity: Global behemoths and tax</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358140#post358140</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358140#post358140</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I stand corrected then. I know of a company with a clause like that in its shareholder agreement.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:41:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358135#post358135</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358135#post358135</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						One thing that did bug me about the article was its bundling of Methanex (a local company) with profit-shifting multinationals for the sole reason that Methanex paid no tax on a reasonable profit. Methanex did so because it, entirely legitimately, had been carrying previous years' losses on the books and…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:10:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358128#post358128</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358128#post358128</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> If they do anything to lower shareholder value, they can be taken to court by the shareholders.</q></p><p>Really? As a shareholder, director and manager I will call bullshit on this and similar claims. Companies create and destroy shareholder value every day. Nobody would take an executive position anywhere if this…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 13:25:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358116#post358116</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358116#post358116</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>I will however point out, that said companies, are generally required (by law ?), to maximise returns for shareholders… which obviously, includes not “spending” money that does not need to be spent… thus, it’s not just a “moral” matter… they are obliged either by legal requirement or at least perceived…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 07:31:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>FletcherB</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358108#post358108</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358108#post358108</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Just as some people needed a god to be good, <br />so companies need laws to keep them being upstanding contributing patrons of society.</q></p><p>Yes, thats about the size of it...  especially when large chunks of the shareholders  are other companies or investment schemes... not just "mom+pop" investors who might be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2016 13:59:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358102#post358102</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358102#post358102</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>so they don’t have a legal way to avoid them…</q></p><p>Just as some people needed a god to be good, <br />so companies need laws to keep them being upstanding contributing patrons of society.<br />"Maximising returns for shareholders"?<br />Its a shitty argument</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2016 22:45:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>FletcherB</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358100#post358100</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358100#post358100</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I do not wish, for one second, to be seen as supporting or applauding multinationals with billions in revenue, not paying their fair share and supporting our governments revenue base, which will help pay for government services and relieve the personal tax burden. on individual citizens...</p><p>I will however point…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2016 20:31:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358097#post358097</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358097#post358097</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> I can buy that same Mac in the US for $1299. On a straight currency conversion that’s NZ$1900. Is an extra $500 per unit justified to get the product to NZ?</q></p><p>Are you adjusting for GST vs the still to be added on sales tax for the US state you…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2016 11:48:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alfie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358096#post358096</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358096#post358096</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&amp;objectid=11608119" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Herald cartoon</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2016 11:47:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alfie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358095#post358095</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358095#post358095</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						An inquiry into multinationals taking the piss out of the IRD and ripping off NZ taxpayers? Revenue Minister <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/78018627/revenue-minister-michael-woodhouse-says-inquiry-would-shed-little-light" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael Woodhouse</a> says <em>nah!</em>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2016 11:29:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Heather McCracken</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358089#post358089</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358089#post358089</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I can buy the same 13 inch Macbook Pro (2.6GHZ, 128GB HDD, 8GB RAM) from Apple for $2,399 and from JB HiFi for exactly the same price. </q></p><p>There's also the substantial markup on US prices. I can buy that same Mac in the US for $1299. On a straight currency…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2016 03:11:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358088#post358088</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358088#post358088</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks for the article Rob. I did think Labour's response was a bit tepid. The whole "let's wait for the OECD to sort it out" is, frankly, nuts.</p><p>I don't know about the oil sector. The pharma sector drives me nuts (see also TPP and IP and monopolies). Yay we…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2016 00:30:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358087#post358087</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358087#post358087</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>We have fully-staffed Treasury and IRD with the requisite analytical skills, public duty and powers to address these issues</q></p><p>But you know what Treasury and the Inland Revenue Department does <em>NOT</em> (and never should have) the public duty or powers to do? Write tax legislation.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2016 00:25:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358086#post358086</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358086#post358086</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I reckon Facebook and Apple are two good cases to make an example of. You don’t necessarily need a law change – more aggressive enforcement of existing laws, including testing grey areas in court, could get us on a good path. </q></p><p>Which is all very nice, and I don't disagree,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2016 00:22:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Lyall</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358083#post358083</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358083#post358083</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Which if any of those hypothetical scenarios bears any resemblance to reality?</q></p><p>Google is probably (5) right now but I know of companies that I guess are each of the others. In the past Google was some of the other options. Companies like Facebook, Amazon, Yahoo, Microsoft, Dropbox might be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:43:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358082#post358082</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358082#post358082</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Which if any of those hypothetical scenarios bears any resemblance to reality?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:24:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Lyall</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358081#post358081</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358081#post358081</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>In the case of Google, nz eyeballs ARE the added value. Nz advertisers are the local revenue stream. Google get both for close to nothing tax wise.</q></p><p>Note we are talking about company profit here not GST or other sales taxes (and interesting but different issue). </p><p>How much tax should…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:14:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358080#post358080</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358080#post358080</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The important thing is that the 1,2 or 10 people working in New Zealand for Apple, Google or Facebook don't generate all that much added value for the companies. </q></p><p>I guess that depends on how you slice it. For example, the Austrian-based Red Bull GmbH, which must be a significant…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 21:30:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358077#post358077</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358077#post358077</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>In the case of apple, there's "added value" and then there's markup (or pure profit.) It's pretty clear the majority of that comes from sales here.<br />And how much of apple's "added value" really comes from Ireland? <br />In the case of Google,  nz eyeballs ARE the added value. Nz advertisers…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 21:13:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Swan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358076#post358076</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358076#post358076</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Simon Lyall, agreed.  The question is what is the size of the NZ workforce, and is tje profit declared in proportion to that.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 21:08:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>kiwiwolf</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358074#post358074</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358074#post358074</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And no matter what the wrong you can guarantee to find at least 1 kiwi prepared to make excuses for them.<br />I wonder if the fact that IRD etc do nothing about it has anything to do with politicians holding shares? or am I being too synical</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:23:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Lyall</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358072#post358072</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358072#post358072</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>This is a story that comes around regularly, John Campbell <a href="http://www.radionz.co.nz/programmes/first-person/story/201776580/first-person-with-john-campbell-apple&#039;s-high-ideals-and-low-tax-bill" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">did it just 6 months ago</a> and it has been done many times before that.</p><p>The important thing is that the 1,2 or 10 people working in New Zealand for Apple, Google or Facebook <strong>don't</strong> generate all that much added…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:14:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358066#post358066</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358066#post358066</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The same underhandedness is also behind Hollywood accounting. When a film breaks even many times over,  the big studios involved are still able to declare a loss on paper and use it to justify shafting the cast & crew. The more savvy Hollywood players circumvent this by insisting on a cut…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 18:45:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358062#post358062</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358062#post358062</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>We could just leave it in the ground to appreciate in value.</q><br />True 'nuff! &ndash; after all...<br /><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrxRJ9HlfZk" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrxRJ9HlfZk</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:54:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358061#post358061</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358061#post358061</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Oil royalties aren't a business tax though, they're the oil company paying us for the oil, which is ours. We could just leave it in the ground to appreciate in value.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:29:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Angela Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358059#post358059</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358059#post358059</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						You're being generous if you think they missed it. They just haven't done anything about it.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:42:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Davis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358058#post358058</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358058#post358058</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						What I find most upsetting about this whole episode is that we have to rely on a journalist to bring to our attention a fundamental feature of our public policy &ndash; namely, a revenue base being eroded in clear view by some very visible actors. We have fully-staffed Treasury and…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 13:44:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bob daktari</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358054#post358054</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358054#post358054</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						there is little margin for the reseller due to the wholesale price from apple hence the sales disclaimers &ndash; all the peripherials stores like to sell around idevices are from other manufacturers, apple is very aggressive at keeping all the money
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 13:07:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358051#post358051</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358051#post358051</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Generalized Indignation and Outrage...</q><br />Could this be called GIO politics?<br />:- )</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 12:44:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kiwiiano</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358050#post358050</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358050#post358050</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm willing to believe that Apple does have very meagre margins on their retail prices, they always have. That's why whenever you see the TV ad trumpeting "25% OFF EVERYTHING IN STORE" there's always the fine print at the bottom of the screen "excludes Apple products" and why they're always…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 12:43:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bob daktari</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358049#post358049</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358049#post358049</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>the argument holds for most things &ndash; other than oil still being essential (for now)</p><p>I'm in the Generalized indignation and Outrage camp &ndash; good corporate citizens don't shirk their responsibilities to the communities they serve (and profit from), that includes paying their taxes, not minimising them</p><p>Their behaviour is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 12:39:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Salmond</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358046#post358046</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358046#post358046</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						@Bob: If you read the rest of that same paragraph, you'll find I don't think the same argument holds for everything.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 12:10:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bob daktari</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358045#post358045</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358045#post358045</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Not sure why oil gets sympathy where tech doesn't... other than its an essential item (currently)</p><p><q>I am willing to buy that <strong>oil</strong> companies have a lower profit margin in far flung, spread out New Zealand than elsewhere.</q></p><p>Replace oil with anything and hey thats NZ</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:58:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358044#post358044</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-global-behemoths-and-tax/?p=358044#post358044</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:58:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
