<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | OnPoint: You don&#039;t need double-talk – you need Bob Loblaw!</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48355#post48355</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48355#post48355</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>If it wasn't for Russell's suggestion that there is more to this than meets the eye, I would have assumed from what was said that someone had made allegations they couldn't substantiate and was forced to apologise when someone called bullsh*t.</p></blockquote><p>I have professional links on both sides of the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:36:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48332#post48332</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48332#post48332</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I mean a voluntary scheme, where interested parties can sign up and say "here's our code of ethics."</p></blockquote><p>There are several such codes out there. A google search for "bloggers code of ethics" will point you to umpteen.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:20:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48321#post48321</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48321#post48321</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>What would your cousin make of Simon Barnett hosting "Stars in your eyes", still promoting all of the best Hits</p></blockquote><p>If I had to hazard a guess, I think he would claim to have never heard of it but secretly watch it religiously.  I'm a fan of David Hasselhoff so…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:51:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joshua Drummond</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48320#post48320</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48320#post48320</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>*Huge* can of worms. The Internet is global you know. My blogs (like most peoples) are hosted in the US (actually, I'm not sure that LJ hasn't moved its hosting to Russia).</p></blockquote><p>Oops. I should have been waaaay more specific. I was thinking in a New Zealand context, it might…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:26:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Shep  Cheyenne</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48319#post48319</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48319#post48319</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"I have a cousin with a degree in irony studies."</p><p>What would your cousin make of Simon Barnett hosting "Stars in your eyes", still promoting all of the  best Hits. <clap of the hands, onto the knee &amp; a kick &ndash; da daa></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:11:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48318#post48318</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48318#post48318</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I've found this whole discussion really useful.</p></blockquote><p>If it wasn't for Russell's suggestion that there is more to this than meets the eye, I would have assumed from what was said that someone had made allegations they couldn't substantiate and was forced to apologise when someone called bullsh*t.  </p><p>I have…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:02:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48315#post48315</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48315#post48315</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>(actually, I'm not sure that LJ hasn't moved its hosting to Russia).</p></blockquote><p>Ha, in Soviet Russia, blog hosts you. Which would certainly simplify things. </p><p>As someone still hanging on to their Listener subscription by the skin of their last straw, (as yet nobody rips the Black page off <em>my</em> copy),…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 20:04:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48312#post48312</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48312#post48312</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>self-regulatory body might need to be established for internet media</p></blockquote><p>*Huge* can of worms. The Internet is global you know. My blogs (like most peoples) are hosted in the US (actually, I'm not sure that LJ hasn't moved its hosting to Russia).</p><p>Would there be a global body. Whose standards…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:34:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48307#post48307</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48307#post48307</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'd just like to point out that someone from APN is watching this thread closely.</p></blockquote><p>I expect they would be! But I'm sure we get a <em>lot</em> of accesses from APN IP numbers.</p><p>All page impressions happily welcomed.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:10:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48305#post48305</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48305#post48305</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p><em>Don't go into journalism Josh, your research of primary sources is too scary &ndash; what you really need to do is say "he said.... but she said no he's wrong". You can fill pages and pages doing that. ;-)</em></p><p>Uhhh... is that a compliment? Sorry, my sarcasm detector is playing…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:04:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joshua Drummond</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48295#post48295</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48295#post48295</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Cheers, insider outsider. The sarcasm detector is restored and working properly.</p><blockquote><p>But what happens if they uphold a complaint and the blogger just ignores them? I doubt they'd persuade Google or another blog hoster to remove the pages without an American court order.</p></blockquote><p>I guess that might be one of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:24:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48289#post48289</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48289#post48289</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>That's why I think corporates should not be allowed to sue for defamation (gawd remember the Oprah defaming beef issue?) it should be for individuals alone.</p></blockquote><p>I'd imagine that it'd open it up as a free-for-all defaming every corporation around. Which can harm them, which can harm their income and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:52:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>insider outsider</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48288#post48288</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48288#post48288</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>I'd just like to point out that someone from APN is watching this thread closely.</em></p><p>It's not me. It would be nice if they sat and had a chat...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:50:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48286#post48286</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48286#post48286</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Apparently they will consider a complaint about any print media source ... with a large enough circulation/readership -</p></blockquote><p>But what happens if they uphold a complaint and the blogger just ignores them? I doubt they'd persuade Google or another blog hoster to remove the pages without an American court order.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:46:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48285#post48285</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48285#post48285</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I'd just like to point out that someone from APN is watching this thread closely. There's an APN IP semi-permanently visiting Hot Topic at the moment (according to Statcounter), and they're clicking through from here from time to time. I wonder if they have nothing better to do...?</p><p>The intertubes…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:43:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>insider outsider</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48284#post48284</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48284#post48284</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>It's corporate vs an individual.</em></p><p>That's why I think corporates should not be allowed to sue for defamation (gawd remember the Oprah defaming beef issue?) it should be for individuals alone.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:42:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>insider outsider</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48282#post48282</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48282#post48282</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>Uhhh... is that a compliment? Sorry, my sarcasm detector is playing up.</em></p><p>yes and a criticism of current media practices.</p><p><br />In terms of fronts groups, i see them as more groups that are created by special interests to have the veneer of independence and concerned citizen sponteneity. Happens all the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:39:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48276#post48276</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48276#post48276</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Now maybe APN went nuclear too early,</p></blockquote><p>No shit. Bit like the way they reacted to the reporting of the John Key "wages" gaff. Is there a track record forming? Should Scoop have a page a month for each APN action that has curtailed freedom of speech? Where are the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:10:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rochelle Hume</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48275#post48275</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48275#post48275</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Speaking as a former journalist-defendant (albeit in a non-defamation-related case) who's not a lawyer and can't really afford lawyers, I would argue that it's the non-legal avenues that are the most effective. Last time, we had to go through the whole High Court process to overturn an injunction (and pay…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:07:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48273#post48273</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48273#post48273</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Don't go into journalism Josh, your research of primary sources is too scary &ndash; what you really need to do is say "he said.... but she said no he's wrong". You can fill pages and pages doing that. ;-)</p></blockquote><p>Yeah seriously. You rang up the Press Council and found out…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:54:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48272#post48272</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48272#post48272</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>A more useful change of defamation law might to make it illegal to threaten defamation action &ndash; without proof of actual defamation.</p><p>If the allegedly defamed accuser can't prove defamation &ndash; they have to pay special damages to the publisher/author...</p><p>It would be one way to remove some power from…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:43:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joshua Drummond</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48268#post48268</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48268#post48268</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Don't go into journalism Josh, your research of primary sources is too scary &ndash; what you really need to do is say "he said.... but she said no he's wrong". You can fill pages and pages doing that. ;-)</p></blockquote><p>Uhhh... is that a compliment? Sorry, my sarcasm detector is playing…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:22:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joshua Drummond</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48267#post48267</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48267#post48267</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Okay. So not a front, just concerned citizens who go out of their way to speak at American conservative think-tank talks about how climate change is a "non problem" and how they should "have the courage to do nothing" (according to the original Listener article.) <br />It is extremely well documented…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:19:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>insider outsider</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48266#post48266</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48266#post48266</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Don't go into journalism Josh, your research of primary sources is too scary &ndash; what you really need to do is say "he said.... but she said no he's wrong". You can fill pages and pages doing that. ;-)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:10:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48265#post48265</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48265#post48265</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I think it is misguided and bordering on offensive to doubt their views are anything but genuine.</p></blockquote><p>I'm quite sure their <em>views</em> are genuine, and they are perfectly entitled to try to influence public policy. That's their right, and I will defend it. However, what's really offensive is the way…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:04:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joshua Drummond</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48264#post48264</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48264#post48264</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>you have to be a member of the PC to be subject to it. Bloggers and individuals generally aren't. I suspect this wasn't an option for the Listener, hence my comments about the rules not applying.</p></blockquote><p>I gave the Press Council a ring to check this out. Apparently they will…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:59:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>insider outsider</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48263#post48263</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48263#post48263</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>If it was pointed out that the CSC (and their ilk) are a front for conservative think-tanks in each story they were quoted in, you could provide "balance" whilst simultaneously pointing out that they are crackpots. Their credibility would, I think, diminish accordingly.</em></p><p>Joshua</p><p>I don't think there is any…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:47:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joshua Drummond</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48258#post48258</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48258#post48258</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The media in general seem happy to hide behind notions of providing "balance" or fostering "debate" when printing the CSC stuff, but seems to be happy to ignore the duty of accuracy they owe their readers. The CSC use this to get away with calling black white.</p></blockquote><p>I often wonder…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:19:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48254#post48254</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48254#post48254</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Sorry, Kim's post is at Hard News...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:04:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>insider outsider</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48253#post48253</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48253#post48253</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Joshua</p><p>you have to be a member of the PC to be subject to it. Bloggers and individuals generally aren't. I suspect this wasn't an option for the Listener, hence my comments about the rules not applying.</p><p><br />Rochelle</p><p>You're in a logic loop. You can't claim defamation if you can't…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:01:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48252#post48252</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48252#post48252</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Your interest is in the efforts of the CSC. IMO they are fringe and the more attention you pay them the more credibility they get.</p></blockquote><p>Yes, to an extent that's true, but there is little equivalence between the Leyland/de Freitas article appearing 70,000 copies of The Listener, and my [[http://hot-topic.co.nz/2008/04/14/ill-drown-in-my-own-tears/…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:01:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joshua Drummond</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48251#post48251</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48251#post48251</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I kind of wondered about that. But I assumed AUT Media would be. Just an assumption, of course, and we know where those get U and Me.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:59:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48249#post48249</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48249#post48249</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>If the Listener had a legitimate grievance, why didn't they go to the Press Council instead of bringing in the heavy guns?</p></blockquote><p>Is the publishing web site a member of the NZ Press Council? I presume they can only sanction members, not anyone who publishes stuff.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:54:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joshua Drummond</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48248#post48248</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48248#post48248</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>If the Listener had a legitimate grievance, why didn't they go to the Press Council instead of bringing in the heavy guns? It's like gardening with dynamite. Why the over-the-top response? What was said that was So Very Bad? <br /> Now the Listener is in a tricky spot. If this gets…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:48:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rochelle Hume</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48246#post48246</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48246#post48246</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>A more useful change of defamation law might to make it illegal to threaten defamation action &ndash; without proof of actual defamation.</p><p>If the allegedly defamed accuser can't prove defamation &ndash; they have to pay special damages to the publisher/author...</p><p>It would be one way to remove some power from…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:36:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>insider outsider</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48242#post48242</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48242#post48242</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Russell</p><p>I think we are talking past each other. The risk is that journalists and bloggers are considered the same. Correct me if I’m wrong, but you seem to want the journalist ‘rules’ built up over years to apply to bloggers. </p><p>I don’t agree. Bloggers aren’t journalists and so the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:58:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48234#post48234</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48234#post48234</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Sorry I'm not part of your " in crowd" and in on the big secrets. If you don't want these things discussed and people to make judgements, why do you post them on a public blog?</p></blockquote><p>I want people to discuss the issue. I would be better if I was…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:40:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48233#post48233</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48233#post48233</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Private Eye almost makes a point of doing it and were famous for their pursuit of Maxwell.</p></blockquote><p>Well, since you brought it up...  When Robert Maxwell died, I believe he had over a hundred libel cases in train and not all the defendants had proprietors with pockets as deep as…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:38:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Brislen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48230#post48230</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48230#post48230</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Oh, that reads far more sanctimoniously than I intended. Sorry about that. I'm genuinely pleased to see these issues getting an airing. I'm also chuffed it's not on my blog. Heh.</p><p>Cheers</p><p>Paul</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:58:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Brislen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48229#post48229</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48229#post48229</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>In many ways, IO, you're proving my point. This is exactly how we're supposed to settle things &ndash; debating the issue, driving traffic, giving the readers something to think about. Giving the writers something to think about.</p><p>Legal action like this solves nothing &ndash; it doesn't achieve its goal of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:57:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48228#post48228</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48228#post48228</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p><em>And if a media law specialist (Steven) and two former editors (Paul and I) can't mount an argument you deem credible, it might just be time to give up anyway</em></p><p>What? I am supposed to be so awestruck by the ranks serried against me that I just suspend my views?.</p></blockquote><p>…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:02:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>insider outsider</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48225#post48225</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48225#post48225</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>Can I just say that I find it remarkable that i/o feels able to judge &ndash; with no knowledge of the facts beyond those published &ndash; exactly what went on/is going on. </em></p><p>Sorry I'm not part of your " in crowd" and in on the big secrets. If you…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 01:43:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48222#post48222</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48222#post48222</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Can I just say that I find it remarkable that i/o feels able to judge &ndash; with no knowledge of the facts beyond those published &ndash; exactly what went on/is going on. And that his "reading" of my original article is so different to everyone else's &ndash; except, perhaps, Ms…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 23:40:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48221#post48221</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48221#post48221</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I don't think I can say any more in general terms without touching  on elements of the dispute I don't feel I should comment on.</p><p>And if a media law specialist (Steven) and two former editors (Paul and I) can't mount an argument you deem credible, it might just be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 23:27:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>insider outsider</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48220#post48220</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48220#post48220</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>Okay, on the basis that you're really not just being disingenuous ...</em></p><p>Why would you even think that? Just because someone disagrees with your POV? Or blog weariness?</p><p>What's interesting in yours and Paul's posts is a whole range of assumed unwritten 'rules' about polite behaviour between media organisations. </p><p>The…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 23:09:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jeremy Andrew</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48213#post48213</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48213#post48213</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Commercial art at that.</p></blockquote><p>If I was to try the limits of a new beemer, it'd be origami</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:05:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Brislen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48208#post48208</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48208#post48208</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>My problem with this is not in the disagreement between writer and editor, or even the disagreement between magazine and blogger, it's the way it's been "resolved" for want of a better word.</p><p>Journalists should not threaten legal action against other journalists. </p><p>That's it, really. It leaves a foul taste…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:48:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48206#post48206</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48206#post48206</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I clicked on it, then discovered, I could take one for a test spin. Better they are offering under there training program, the chance to push one to it's outer technological limits.</p></blockquote><p>Cool! You could make it an art event ...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:12:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48203#post48203</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48203#post48203</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Okay, on the basis that you're really not just being disingenuous ...</p><blockquote><p>Is there anything that happened here that doesn't happen most weeks on newspapers and magazines that is especialy new and worrying?</p></blockquote><p>Yes. You'll always have someone annoyed by what's been said about them &mdash; usually they're offered the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:31:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>insider outsider</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48200#post48200</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48200#post48200</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>Journalists  should settle these things like journalists...</em></p><p>What? A punch up at the Qantas Awards?</p><p>Seriously, I can't see the handwringing over this. Russell might think I am being naive, but an experienced writer wrote a blog column that trashed an editor's decisions and reputation, doesn't appear to have checked…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:42:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48193#post48193</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48193#post48193</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>PS &ndash; so an ad for BMWs, eh? What is the world coming to!</p></blockquote><p>The statistics say y'all's a bunch of wealthy mofos ...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:49:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Brislen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48192#post48192</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48192#post48192</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						PS &ndash; so an ad for BMWs, eh? What is the world coming to!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:46:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Brislen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48191#post48191</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48191#post48191</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>couldn't agree more. It makes my skin crawl. Journalists should settle these things like journalists, using the editorial column, not with lawyers.</p><p>Just unacceptable.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:46:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48189#post48189</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48189#post48189</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>this legal action should keep Bell Gully busy for a while. They'll have to slapp Hard News, Kiwiblog, Poneke, Deltoid and the rest.</p></blockquote><p>I bloody hope not. That would put me in a very difficult position, given that I have professional connections with publishers on both sides of the dispute…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:42:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Thomas</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48177#post48177</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48177#post48177</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						kind of cunning really.  that "correction & apology" is only going to make the Listener look like even bigger dickheads.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:32:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48173#post48173</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48173#post48173</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>'The people in the electorate of Selwyn deserve someone who is of immediate Cabinet material, I am able to offer that opportunity,' Mr Payne told the court."</p></blockquote><p>Wait. Courts can stop people standing for election if they're not of cabinet material?</p><p>Wait! I've got a long list to develop, and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:48:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>cindy baxter</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48168#post48168</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48168#post48168</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						this legal action should keep Bell Gully busy for a while.  They'll have to slapp Hard News,  Kiwiblog, Poneke, Deltoid and the rest.  The NZ Herald also ran the story...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:33:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48149#post48149</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48149#post48149</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>From Monty Python:<br /><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=K7D8A7e4TEY&amp;feature=related" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Politicians: An Apology</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:02:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48148#post48148</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-you-dont-need-double-talk-you-need/?p=48148#post48148</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:02:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
