<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | OnPoint: Why Rightwingers Should Support the CGT</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=330187#post330187</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=330187#post330187</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>In October1974, the Labour Government announced the establishment of the ohu scheme for groups of New Zealand citizens willing to set up alternative communities or settlements in rural areas. Prime Minister Kirk said that the reasons for it were mainly spiritual and social </q></p><p>Very spiritual indeed, seeing as Kirk died…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 14:16:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=330179#post330179</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=330179#post330179</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks a lot for that Ian, that’s an intriguing plot of history.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2014 18:00:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=330170#post330170</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=330170#post330170</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Come together...</strong><br /><q>Why are collectables exempt? </q><br />Probably a typo...<br />I'm guessing it's a vestigial trace of Labour's <a href="http://www.converge.org.nz/evcnz/resources/ohu.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ohu collective scheme...</a><br /><q> In October1974, the Labour Government announced the establishment of the ohu scheme for groups of New Zealand citizens willing to set up alternative communities or settlements in rural areas. Prime…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2014 08:46:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=330166#post330166</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=330166#post330166</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://campaign.labour.org.nz/capital_gains_tax" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Labour Capital Gains</a> tax question #3:</p><p><q>Exemptions: The family home, personal assets, collectables, small business assets sold for retirement and payouts from retirement savings schemes, including KiwiSaver, will be exempt.</q></p><p>Why are collectables exempt? Who can afford collectables? Are vintage cars and <a href="http://www.omaka.org.nz/about-us.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">planes</a> collectables? Are <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/arts/9877078/McCahons-Kauri-painting-sells-for-352-000" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">paintings</a> collectables? Are Ming vases…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2014 07:28:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220934#post220934</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220934#post220934</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Misinformation has flourished since the CGT announcement, helped along by Farrar and co and faithfully rebroadcast by the credulous. Danyl debunks some of it.</q></p><p>Yeah, but 90% is even worse than the figures that were presented there.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:55:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220785#post220785</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220785#post220785</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>they now could be stuck with the kind of tax the rest of us actually pay</q></p><p>Nah, they only have to pay 15% &ndash; but just listen to the whining about getting to keep 85% of the gains.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 21:18:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220784#post220784</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220784#post220784</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>do you have a source for that</q></p><p>Misinformation has flourished since the CGT announcement, helped along by Farrar and co and faithfully rebroadcast by the credulous. <a href="http://dimpost.wordpress.com/2011/07/15/dpfs-graph/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Danyl debunks</a> some of it.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 21:16:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220783#post220783</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220783#post220783</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I'd really love to know a source for that (totally outrageous )figure also...<br />Raymond A Francis- envy tax? Nope. Just the justifable resentment at seeing a certain sector get away with paying very little tax &ndash; and getting a huge profit upon retirement &amp; sale of their property. And the joy…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 21:08:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220777#post220777</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220777#post220777</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>We have 90% of all families in NZ paying no income tax when you take into account WFF..</q></p><p>Umm, do you have a source for that?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 19:02:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220535#post220535</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220535#post220535</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						touche.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:02:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Raymond A Francis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220502#post220502</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220502#post220502</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>If this is not an envy tax but a way to allow/encourage citizens to make better financial decisions, why are gambling gains tax free<br />Just crazy and why an exemption for small business but not agriculture, again "let's stick it to people who don't vote for us" <br />And now never…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:33:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220498#post220498</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220498#post220498</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Mine lost money before it ever even made it to the water.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:15:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>FletcherB</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220490#post220490</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220490#post220490</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I love the fact people are complaining that boats arent included....  when has a boat EVER gone up in value?  Where are all the people getting rich from boat speculation?</p><p>dont forget that old joke.... the definition of "boat" is a hole in the water you pour money into...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 09:15:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220397#post220397</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220397#post220397</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Hum...</p><p><q>Collectables</p><p>Collectables, such as jewellery, antiques, artwork, rare folios or stamp collections and the like will be exempt from the CGT.</p><p>A CGT that included collectables would be intrusive, result in high compliance costs, and would not raise significant revenue. </q></p><p>Why shouldn't right-wing rich-pricks support this?  The yacht ("personal…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:04:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220396#post220396</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220396#post220396</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>After 9 years of Labour back pay was not guaranteed and if you are under a collective agreement you lost the right to take industrial action.</p><p>Add to this that workers in belonging to a union actually cede their right to be consulted on bargaining and a wide range of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:01:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220393#post220393</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220393#post220393</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> <em>the over reach of WFF and the depressive effect that it has had on wage bargaining</em></p><p>You may have the causality backwards. If pay rates as a proportion of total company profits and productivity improvement had even stayed the same over the past few decades, a wage subsidy would never…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 16:48:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220392#post220392</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220392#post220392</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the over reach of WFF and the depressive effect that it has had on wage bargaining</q></p><p>You may have the causality backwards. If pay rates as a proportion of total company profits and productivity improvement had even stayed the same over the past few decades, a wage subsidy would never…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 16:43:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220390#post220390</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220390#post220390</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>NZ is a small economy which doesn't have a wide base.</p><p>Any reform of the tax regime needs to address the over reach of WFF and the depressive effect that it has had on wage bargaining and growth in the economy.</p><p>The CGT proposal avoids a lot of structural issues…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 16:36:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220308#post220308</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220308#post220308</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Other exemptions will include ... inherited assets</q></p><p>I hope they're bringing back death duties then.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:47:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220306#post220306</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220306#post220306</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I don't think 'family homes' should be exempted either</q></p><p>As people have said upthread, that's a purely political move rather than a logical one.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:45:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>uroskin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220288#post220288</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220288#post220288</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						15% CGT doesn't make sense as it also distort the market for investment. It should be levied at the personal marginal tax rate. And I don't think 'family homes' should be exempted either as there can be some creative accounting applied there too (who qualifies for owning a family home?…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:20:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220276#post220276</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220276#post220276</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I guess this whole thread is moot, because right-wingers have absolutely nothing to fear from <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&amp;objectid=10738345" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this piss-weak effort</a>:</p><p><q>Labour hopes to swing public opinion behind its capital gains tax plan by including an exemption for hundreds of thousands of tradespeople and small owner-operated businesses.</p><p>And it is understood there will be…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 08:35:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>martinb</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220155#post220155</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220155#post220155</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						With the Greens and Norman coming out strongly on the CGT are we going to see a common desire for a focus on the productive side of the NZ economy push towards a new government, with perhaps some of that investment going towards NZ companies creating greener technologies for export?…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:28:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220049#post220049</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220049#post220049</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						This seems pretty reasonable. I like the cherry picking idea, as South Africa did 10 years ago, <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&amp;objectid=10738073" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&amp;objectid=10738073</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:05:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220046#post220046</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220046#post220046</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I hope not &ndash; as I've pointed out elsewhere in the US the special lower CGT rate (25%) is only available to people who invest long term (2 years minimum) &ndash; house flippers, day traders, currency speculators etc need not apply
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:12:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220045#post220045</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220045#post220045</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						If we introduce a tax on capital gains at 15%, does that mean that those people who are currently taxed at marginal rates for capital gains that IRD treats as income (house flippers, day traders etc.) will have their tax rates on such transactions reduced to the CGT rate?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:40:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220043#post220043</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220043#post220043</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I've got the same 2 halves, Gareth. But also in my mind about the second half is "National's partisan kneejerkery could bite them in the arse and erode their support on this one". So actually, both halves are positive.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:32:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220041#post220041</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220041#post220041</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Half of me is thinking "damn, National's partisan kneejerkery means they have to attack this excellent idea, and odds on it's them back in charge of Government this time around".   <br />However the other half is thinking "at least now we have one of the major parties supporting it and so…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:55:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220027#post220027</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220027#post220027</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yes, it does seem like an idea that's been ruled out by arbitrary thinking from long ago. It might lead to the beginning of a sweeping change to our curious orthodoxy in NZ that is so damned unorthodox everywhere else in the world.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:34:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220022#post220022</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=220022#post220022</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>I actually think this move by Labour will be quite positive and powerful, and that National have either miscalculated or simply been outmaneuvered. I did not expect anywhere near the support the idea has received on this site. It’s nice to see an issue the Left is not divided on.…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 23:52:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Angus Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219892#post219892</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219892#post219892</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>That said, I am rapidly wading out of my depth on economic issues, so take everything I say with a handful of salt.</q></p><p>Ditto</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:53:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219890#post219890</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219890#post219890</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I most foreign CGT regimes a capital improvement is not included as part of the capital gain on the asset.</p><p>When I sold my California house I was able to to write off: the new roof we'd just put on, the money we spent painting it to tart it up…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:48:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219884#post219884</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219884#post219884</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>That is the normal way business taxation operates (and renting out houses is more like a business activity than banking cash or working for an employer). You pay tax on any profit after expenses. </p><p>Also, buildings intrinsically depreciate in value. Land appreciates, mostly.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:15:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Butler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219879#post219879</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219879#post219879</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>That’s not my understanding of what we’re likely to see. Capital gain is profit you make from your house value increasing just because houses do that.</p><p>Investing money by improving the property would be exempt from the capital gains tax wouldn’t it? Otherwise if you buy a empty bit of…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 09:45:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219852#post219852</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219852#post219852</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Sigh I'm left with hoping the ABs lose the RWC because that is about the only thing I can see able to damage the National Party halo at the moment.</q></p><p>I actually think this move by Labour will be quite positive and powerful, and that National have either miscalculated or…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:12:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219850#post219850</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219850#post219850</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>If capital improvements to private dwellings are to be tax free, whilst those on rental dwellings are taxed at 15%, capital improvements to private property will be preferred and those to rental property deferred. Overall this is not good for the people who rent, if their landlord is going to…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:02:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Brent Jackson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219847#post219847</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219847#post219847</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Sigh I’m left with hoping the ABs lose the RWC because that is about the only thing I can see able to damage the National Party halo at the moment.</q></p><p>I would really like to <em>do</em> something to try and stop National from getting into power again.  But I don't…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:44:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ross Calverley</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219844#post219844</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219844#post219844</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						You are assuming that all policy gets forgotten after an election. That isn't true. A party will recycle policy if it thinks there is a need for it. Look at Act. Using Labour Party economic policy of the 1980s, while using National Party Racial policy of the mid 2000s. Look…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:37:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219803#post219803</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219803#post219803</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Pull the rug from under that, and capitalism starts to look decidedly shaky. So the right are never going to be keen on capital taxes &ndash; turkeys, christmas and all that.</q></p><p>How better to fight wedge politics, than with wedge politics?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:04:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219763#post219763</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219763#post219763</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Doh! Humbly amended.</q></p><p>Sorry!  <br />Although correction is actually more powerful and someone would probably have suggested the entire argument was invalid due to that one line...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:31:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219762#post219762</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219762#post219762</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>So as far as I can tell the arguments against it are:<br />It might be a bit difficult to do right<br />All taxes are evil<br />and<br />Labour proposed it and we oppose anything Labour says</p><p>Given there are a whole bunch of countries that have variations on a CGT theme…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:27:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Butler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219755#post219755</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219755#post219755</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But I’m sure there’s an Occam’s Razor for Economics – that the simplest solution is the most efficient.</q></p><p>Well, both flat tax and poll tax are <em>very</em> efficient. The quibble is whether the most efficient solution is necessarily the <em>best</em>.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:16:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ross Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219754#post219754</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219754#post219754</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hmmm...my simple logic thus: If a landlord improves the rented house, he can up the rent. He thus receives the benefit from day one. He does not have to pay the tax on the capital gain until he sells it. A little bit of optimisation should figure out how much…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:11:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Angus Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219749#post219749</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219749#post219749</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>They might not realize the highest monetary return, but will perhaps on average live in a nicer house, which might be a good thing overall.</q></p><p>If capital improvements to private dwellings are to be tax free, whilst those on rental dwellings are taxed at 15%, capital improvements to private property…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:39:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Greg Sands</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219747#post219747</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219747#post219747</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Sure, I agree &ndash; an all-encompassing one is better than one with exemptions. But the question is, is a CGT with exemptions better than no CGT?</p><p>I think it's an unequivocal yes.<br /></q><br />And I think not.  Why?  The same reasons why I think removing GST off fruit&amp;veg is a silly idea.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:37:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Butler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219741#post219741</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219741#post219741</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Replying to self, OTOH no exemption might help drive investment in improving existing housing versus always trading up, which might be of benefit too...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:18:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Butler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219740#post219740</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219740#post219740</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Optimistic but intriguing! It doesn’t change the efficiency argument: It’s still going to mean that people will invest in things that are not necessarily the best investment (e.g. Houses)</q></p><p>Depends on the meaning of "investment". They might not realize the highest monetary return, but will perhaps on average live in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:13:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219738#post219738</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219738#post219738</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Optimistic but intriguing! It doesn't change the efficiency argument: It's still going to mean that people will invest in things that are not necessarily the best investment (e.g. Houses), but it does mean that they won't consume the gains immediately. Unless they borrow against their houses for consumption...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:01:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Butler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219731#post219731</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219731#post219731</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Am I wrong in thinking that the family home exemption acts kinda like a combined incentive towards better housing and retirement savings? For most people it will not be cashed in until they either trade down in housing (which often happens after retirement) or die (passing the benefit to descendants);…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:34:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219724#post219724</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219724#post219724</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>The "ideal" CGT you describe doesn't actually sound too bad &ndash; applied universally at a flat rate to all capital gains. However, even despite not knowing the details until Thursday, there is a snowball's chance of Labour's proposed CGT coming anywhere close to this. It will be just another set…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:10:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219719#post219719</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219719#post219719</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Doh! Humbly amended.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:02:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219699#post219699</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219699#post219699</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> If a CGT was truly universal, across the board, applying to all gains in capital, and was balanced with reductions in all other taxes, I think there'd be much less "right-wing" resistance, just the usual complaints by "interest groups". </q><br />Hence why I think a good way of launching this would…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:59:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219696#post219696</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219696#post219696</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Excellent post, all great points but the Tax Working Group did not, in the end, support it (falling back on that useless "it's a bit hard excuse"):<br /><q>Most members of the TWG have significant concerns over the practical challenges arising from a comprehensive CGT and the potential distortions and other…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:56:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Greg Sands</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219693#post219693</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219693#post219693</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The "ideal" CGT you describe doesn't actually sound too bad &ndash; applied universally at a flat rate to all capital gains.  However, even despite not knowing the details until Thursday, there is a snowball's chance of Labour's proposed CGT coming anywhere close to this.  It will be just another set…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:45:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Ritchie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219691#post219691</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219691#post219691</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>churning powerpoints</q></p><p>Speaking of which, the Swiss <a href="http://www.anti-powerpoint-party.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Anti-Powerpoint party</a> is seeking to a national referendum to abolish presentation software.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:42:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219690#post219690</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219690#post219690</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em> (sorry, long, but it could be a 300 page book) </em></p><p>Capitalists want to maintain capitalism. Way back in 1867, Marx predicted capitalism to be hosed. The vast majority of the population were oppressed workers and peasants, with a small minority of land and business owners living off their…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:35:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219689#post219689</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-why-rightwingers-should-support-the/?p=219689#post219689</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:35:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
