<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | OnPoint: Table 6.2: &#039;Rich pricks&#039; &amp; Others</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149958#post149958</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149958#post149958</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Doesn't sound like he's planning to ask the unwealthy what they think might be "fair".
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:29:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149957#post149957</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149957#post149957</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>That quote of Mr. Key's. He is saying that to stop people hiding their income in a trust he will lower their tax rate to match that of the trust because they should pay their share?.<br />Scuse me but that is like saying we should raise the speed limit to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:57:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149934#post149934</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149934#post149934</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Any thoughts on transaction taxes?</p></blockquote><p>Sounds ideal, if only it had wider international backing.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:29:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149904#post149904</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149904#post149904</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Any thoughts on transaction taxes?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:27:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149903#post149903</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149903#post149903</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Apparently <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&amp;objectid=10621608" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">what those on the top tax bracket want</a> is more important than that pesky evidence stuff:</p><blockquote><p>But Mr Key said lowering the top tax rate to 33c so it aligned with the trust rate would help stop people sheltering their income in trusts to try to avoid higher personal taxes.…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:26:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149701#post149701</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149701#post149701</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Personal income tax makes up the lion's share of revenue collected by the Government &ndash; income taxes account for $28.5 billion or 53 per cent of all tax revenue, company taxes make up 17 per cent, GST raises 21 per cent of all tax revenue and excise duty such as…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:54:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149519#post149519</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149519#post149519</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Insightful analysis of a subject that I find truly interesting, but all I can think is... man, those are some perty graphs!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:49:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>FletcherB</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149492#post149492</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149492#post149492</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>While not directly relevant to how the balance of income tax is shared amongst income levels... here's a bit about how income tax compares to other revenue streams towards the total tax take...</p><p>__Personal income tax makes up the lion's share of revenue collected by the Government &ndash; income taxes…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:39:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>TracyMac</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149303#post149303</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149303#post149303</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Just as a note, the Australian payroll tax applies to all contractors, whether or not you operate as a "company" and whether or not you're an individual. A lot of companies in Oz prefer contract employees (especially in IT) because then they don't have to fork out the payroll tax…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:16:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andre</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149299#post149299</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149299#post149299</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Also I find it difficult to believe that I am given no benefit from joining forces with my partner and forging a life together. She earned a benefit for being a widow with two kids and we forgo that benefit to live together with my 2 step-sons and their 9…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 00:15:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andre</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149293#post149293</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149293#post149293</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I think the point is that rich buggers can suffer taxation better than poor buggers and the governmnt are surfing around this as theory while speculating in a Ruth Richardson or Marie Antoinette manner how much the poor can stand.<br />All of the current changes in place seek to redress…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 23:57:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matt Crawford</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149206#post149206</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149206#post149206</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Paul, </p><p>I think you're wrong. From memory Cullen's "Chewing Gum" Budget in 05 proposed ending fiscal drag by automatically adjusting brackets for inflation. It was a pretty gutsy move at the time, but very politcally unsexy. </p><p>This adjustment was abandoned along with the tax cuts when Cullen launched the "Block…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:43:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149198#post149198</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149198#post149198</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I think that the right wing govts like to give us the illusory tax decreases by readjusting the bars and the lefties tend to like the slight increase in money available to spend ... it's sort of a politically neutral rort
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:08:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149196#post149196</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149196#post149196</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>The problem is that fiscal drag (the opposite of what you want &ndash; which is when the govt quietly gets more money as inflation pulls people up the tax scales) is alluring to politicians &ndash; not only does it quietly help solve their budget woes by bringing in more taxes…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:54:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149185#post149185</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149185#post149185</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>... or you'd need to take a pretty massive punt at the rich, which is actually quite problematic because they can rearrange their affairs into trusts etc.</p></blockquote><p>Uh... they already do that, no?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:10:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149180#post149180</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149180#post149180</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Also on my wishlist &ndash; income scales that slide up with inflation annually, so we don't have people creeping up the scales as their income goes up as money gets worth less.</p></blockquote><p>The problem is that fiscal drag (the opposite of what you want &ndash; which is when the govt…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:51:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149177#post149177</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149177#post149177</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>See what you've done? You've broken the nutshell.</p></blockquote><p>That's what happens when you bring a hammer to the argument.</p><p>The Greens were proposing that their carbon tax could be used to create a tax-offset (I would prefer a simple cheque, actually, for political reasons). I don't think it would generate…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:38:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149175#post149175</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149175#post149175</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Obviously you'd want to pair it with the introduction of another tax, so you'd be revenue neutral.</p></blockquote><p>Problem is that the tax free bracket applies to everyone, so to offset it, you'd need to either tax the whole of the middle-class a bit more (which is politically unpopular), or you'd…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:32:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149173#post149173</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149173#post149173</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>In a separate nutshell: Been costed. Too expensive. (Because you have to pay every single taxpayer $20+/week.)</p></blockquote><p>Yes, what George said. A percent or two at middle incomes would pay for it I would guess.</p><p>Also on my wishlist &ndash; income scales that slide up with inflation annually, so we…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:20:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Samuel Scott</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149171#post149171</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149171#post149171</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Great article. I'm too simple minded to make any actually comment on it, other than i found it really clever and interesting.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:17:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149170#post149170</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149170#post149170</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>In a separate nutshell: Been costed. Too expensive. (Because you have to pay every single taxpayer $20+/week.)</p></blockquote><p>Obviously you'd want to pair it with the introduction of another tax, so you'd be revenue neutral.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:07:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>dc_red</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149169#post149169</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149169#post149169</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>@ Paul C</p><blockquote><p>the various tax free allowances in the US system &ndash; there you can write off the interest on your mortgage, your rates, cost of registering your car, .... it's also why, when I lived there, I filed a 20-30 page tax return ....</p></blockquote><p>Same story in Canada,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:01:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149167#post149167</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149167#post149167</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Surely the attraction of Australia isn't the tax rates, it's just that incomes are higher? Which is much more of a hard job for the government (or indeed anyone) to do anything about.</p></blockquote><p>In a nutshell: Yes.</p><blockquote><p>I'd love it if we had the first 5 thousand tax free in…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:56:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149165#post149165</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149165#post149165</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>2025 taskforce report... proposes to raise our income to the level of Australia by drastically reducing our social spending...</p></blockquote><p>The theory is less public spending means more efficient private provision, which is more cost-effective and frees up resources for more profitable activities. Then we'll all be rich!</p><p>That's the theory,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:54:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149164#post149164</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149164#post149164</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Guaranteed way to "close the gap with Australia"? Legalising WMD testing in the Ureweras.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:52:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149163#post149163</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149163#post149163</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>You've ignored the thresholds that those rates come into force.</p></blockquote><p>...which matters for those on low and middle incomes (hence, they're better off), but matters far less for those on high and very-high incomes &ndash; i.e. The highly skilled, highly mobile workers.</p><p>For workers at the top end of the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:51:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>peteremcc</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149161#post149161</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149161#post149161</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"It's not some kind of tricky accounting. Australia has a tax-free bottom bracket, and at the top end, it goes all the way up to 45% (New Zealand's top rate is 39%). Australia's tax system is simply more progressive."</p><p>You've ignored the thresholds that those rates come into force.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:41:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149155#post149155</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149155#post149155</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>in real terms we wouldn't catch up at all</p></blockquote><p>Depends which "we" they're tinking of &ndash; those who can already afford to buy their own health, education and so on?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:29:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149152#post149152</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149152#post149152</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Something that nobody I've read has commented on about the 2025 taskforce report is that since it proposes to raise our income to the level of Australia by drastically reducing our social spending, unless they plan somehow to force Australia to do the same, it will mean that out of…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:16:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149151#post149151</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149151#post149151</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I love actual facts.</p></blockquote><p>Me too.  I'd therefore advise against reading the foolish "tax is theft" blustering on that Kiwibog thread.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:15:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Grace Dalley</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149147#post149147</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149147#post149147</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I love actual facts.  Thanks Keith!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:58:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149143#post149143</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149143#post149143</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Would that small ideologically -blinded group include the nice Dr Brash ?</p></blockquote><p>He's one of the dudes handing out blindfolds</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149141#post149141</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149141#post149141</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Brilliant work, Keith.  Look forward to an update when the nex tax system is announced in the May Budget.</p><p>Would also be interesting to see the same treatment from the perspective of a small business owner employing staff, including all those costs of doing business that we have so few…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:48:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149128#post149128</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149128#post149128</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						but then so would things like the various tax free allowances in the US system &ndash; there you can write off the interest on your mortgage, your rates,  cost of registering your car, .... it's also why, when I lived there, I filed a 20-30 page tax return ....
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:31:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149126#post149126</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149126#post149126</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Would that <em>small ideologically -blinded group</em>   include the  nice Dr Brash ?<br />The use of Trusts at the higher levels would distort the figures as one income  becomes one person AND a trust</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:27:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149124#post149124</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149124#post149124</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Nice work, Keith &mdash; lovely to see someone touch bases with reality in terms of the tax debate.</p><p>And bloody nice graphs, too!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:25:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149122#post149122</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149122#post149122</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>New Zealand's tax structure is really not all that far from a flat-tax, proportionately. </p><p>I tell people that, and they don't believe me, in part because the debate about this issue has been distorted by a small ideologically-blinded group.</p><p>Of course, there is redistribution on the other side of the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:20:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149113#post149113</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149113#post149113</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I agree it's a pain &ndash; but IMHO not including education/policing because it comes from a different tax isn't really that different from not including social security taxes &ndash; I think the US SS tax is actually harder to include because it stops after you've paid it on the first…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:44:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ScottY</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149112#post149112</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149112#post149112</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Great post, Keith. Unfortunately most of the debate in this country about tax never goes beyond the simplistic. </p><p>They're not taxes on income, but many countries (including Australia) have stamp duties and death duties, and capital gains taxes, whereas we don't. If you look at the overall picture we're not…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:43:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149106#post149106</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149106#post149106</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Surely the attraction of Australia isn't the tax rates, it's just that incomes are higher? Which is much more of a hard job for the government (or indeed anyone) to do anything about.</p><p>I'd love it if we had the first 5 thousand tax free in NZ. It probably wouldn't…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:32:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149100#post149100</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149100#post149100</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Hmm, yes and no.</p><p>Sure, it's a tax burden, but it's not something that comes out of their taxable income, so to compare it with a place that doesn't have payroll tax, you'd need to determine what income would be if the payroll tax was just income tax... and then…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:19:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149093#post149093</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149093#post149093</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And (back on my hobby horse) other countries also have state taxes &ndash; for example Oz funds state education/police/etc that we fund through our income taxes using state payroll taxes &ndash; in essence your employer pays a 5-6% flat tax on your income before you see it &ndash; this is…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:49:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149092#post149092</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-table-62-rich-pricks-others/?p=149092#post149092</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:49:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
