<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | OnPoint: Sock-Puppeting Big Tobacco to Chew on ACT</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=228034#post228034</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=228034#post228034</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'd have to disagree. The thread is a perfect example of what they're trying to do; we've just helped out for free.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:37:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=228031#post228031</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=228031#post228031</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Having read through this thread, I think it's really lost the original point of Keith's post &ndash; what the hell are these tobacco companies trying to do?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 14:59:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227948#post227948</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227948#post227948</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>If it hasn’t been mentioned already, the Granny (by way of the UK Indy) <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/science/news/article.cfm?c_id=82&amp;objectid=10749180" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">has some insight</a> on Big Tobacco’s turd-polishing machines.</p><p>And <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10736380" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">can the PM guarantee what’s happening in Aussie can’t happen to us</a>?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:49:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227943#post227943</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227943#post227943</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>to save them from harming only themselves, objectionable. This is quite possibly an intractable difference of opinion</q></p><p>or an intractable difference of fact. But go right ahead. Carrick is having a good laugh.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:34:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227920#post227920</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227920#post227920</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>7 billion odd manifestations</q><br />or as the Land Lords of the Earth probably think of it<br /><em>a man-infestation of 7 billion</em><br />:- )</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 07:55:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227917#post227917</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227917#post227917</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>100% of people who are born, die.</p><blockquote><p>There are plenty of other pleasurable things that won’t kill you or other people.</p></blockquote><p>You want to tell us how to have fun now? And stop raising the spectre of death, unless you want to venture into deep philosophical arguments about the meaning…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 06:48:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Telfar Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227916#post227916</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227916#post227916</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Further...</p><p><q>Noone bothers measuring the upside</q> <br />Upside?  Seriously?  But anyway, <a href="http://www.moh.govt.nz/moh.nsf/pagescm/1011/$File/socialcoststobaccoalcohol.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">yes, they do</a>.  See page 14.</p><p><q>People don't just take pleasure in smoking, they gain a real pharmacological benefit</q><br />No, they don't.  A pharmacological benefit is one where the risks of the treatment are less than the benefits.  So with…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 03:27:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Telfar Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227915#post227915</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227915#post227915</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Any references for any of that tussock?  ‘Cos otherwise…</p><p><q>depression rises in nations as smoking falls</q> <br />Despite having very good access to every possible respectable medical journal, I can't find a single reference supporting this statement.  Not even ones planted by tobacco companies.</p><p>There is evidence that being depressed can…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 03:24:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>tussock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227911#post227911</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227911#post227911</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						PS: Cigarettes are an anti-depressant (depression rises in nations as smoking falls), an appetite suppressant (obesity rises in nations as smoking falls), an anti-anxiety (more OCD type disorders as smoking falls), and a stimulant (much less dangerous than many other ones so powerful, but most folk use coffee instead) all…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 23:54:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227896#post227896</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227896#post227896</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>bloody Sir  Walter Raleigh….ah<br />the indigenous only smoked it on special occasions…and with great ceremony.<br />I believe......or perhaps Im just a romantic</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:26:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227883#post227883</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227883#post227883</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I guess you could argue that smokers feel coerced or punished by those measures, but given the addictive nature of the product, you could also see it as assistance.</q></p><p>Measures taken, that are likely to create a scenario of physical discomfort and emotional distress, like being unable to find anywhere…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:32:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Armstrong</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227869#post227869</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227869#post227869</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I guess we can put this one down to good old intractable differences of opinion. But my final comment would be that most of the disagreement seems to arise from beliefs about whether restrictive anti-smoking measures should be viewed as punitive. I don't think anyone here has demonised smokers as…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 14:04:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael Savidge</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227867#post227867</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227867#post227867</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Cigarettes do the smoking.....us smokers just suck :)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 13:55:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227866#post227866</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227866#post227866</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>which would most likely be opting for therapy, or going cold turkey and sucking on it</q></p><p>Or, y'know, <em>not</em> sucking on it, surely?</p><p>Just trying to lighten the mood. Coat, getting, gone.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 13:37:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227863#post227863</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227863#post227863</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Judge Dried...</strong><br /> <q>...a red herring</q><br />red herrings become that colour after smoking,<br />a classic case of a cloud removing a silver lining!<br />:- )</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 13:23:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227862#post227862</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227862#post227862</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm quite interesting in any links you do have to the actual economic effects of smoking, Sacha. It is a complicated equation, and from discussions I've had with your about your work, I can see why you feel that getting the economic arguments on your side would be helpful, since…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 13:20:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227861#post227861</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227861#post227861</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'll let people draw their own conclusions, but I'm not going to waste another moment arguing about this. Or about climate change. Or scientology for that matter.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 13:14:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227860#post227860</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227860#post227860</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Logic like that is not helping your case.</q></p><p>Why not?</p><p>Sacha, you haven't produced any evidence either, nor has George. He just linked to the WHO website, which on the dangers of second hand smoke <em>defines</em> that as something that happens indoors. You've only <em>asserted</em> that there is a "prevailing…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 13:12:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227857#post227857</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227857#post227857</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>he'd have to pay for the extra years of super that his non-smoking is going to cost us</q></p><p>Why do people assume that we all stop contributing at age 65, or that you can even quantify the economics without some effort &ndash; and expertise? Though don't get me started on…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:24:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227856#post227856</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227856#post227856</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The existence of individuals that are able to give up tobacco with ease doesn't really fit with the story of people suffering from a disease of the body and mind.</q></p><p>Logic like that is not helping your case.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:19:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227855#post227855</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227855#post227855</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>many people have willed away an addiction to smoking.</p><p>I don't know if the disease theory is correct, but I know that it is not proven correct, the alternatives have not been proven incorrect, and that the alternatives have some strong support.</p><p>That's the best answer I can really give…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:17:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227854#post227854</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227854#post227854</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So then the argument becomes about the moral failings of the smokers, being all visible and addicted</q></p><p>Whether they actually are addicted or not. The existence of individuals that are able to give up tobacco with ease doesn't really fit with the story of people suffering from a disease of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:04:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Martin Lindberg</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227853#post227853</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227853#post227853</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>much-cheaper-in-the-USA Marlboros</q></p><p>they also taste better</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:01:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227852#post227852</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227852#post227852</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						They’d just smuggle cigarettes in and do it anyway, I imagine. (I have had two heavy smokers from the USA visit me in the last decade. I have nothing to say about how many separate packs of much-cheaper-in-the-USA Marlboros they may have secreted in various places in their luggage. Nothing…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:57:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227851#post227851</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227851#post227851</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I think smoking is something the government should commit to eradicating in New Zealand.</q></p><p>I've often wondered what this sort of goal might do for tourism if fully implemented, and potentially for business relationships if rich people from overseas who want to visit NZ for some reason might not be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:54:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227850#post227850</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227850#post227850</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It would also be a good thing (on that sole measure) to kill disabled people. Your point is?</q></p><p>That when Sacha says `Most of the harms I experience from smokers come from sharing a publicly-funded health system with them' he is talking nonsense, or `For both smokers and drinkers, that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:42:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227849#post227849</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227849#post227849</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q><br />You dig?<br /></q><br />Ah! Yes, my comment flew right over the top of yours. I dig that, entirely.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:37:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227848#post227848</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227848#post227848</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>You’re imposing a lot of moral judgement there, but I’m not sure who it’s aimed at. </q></p><p>Jesus Christ on a bike. No, I’m specifically NOT imposing a lot of moral judgement or, indeed, reacting to anything you’ve said, which is all very sensible. (Let me reiterate that once more: VERY…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:34:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227847#post227847</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227847#post227847</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It would also be a good thing (on that sole measure) to kill disabled people. Your point is?</q></p><p>I'd say the point is that while it would be financially profitable in the short term, it'd be socially bankrupt in the long run. The same goes for any bean counter who…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:34:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227845#post227845</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227845#post227845</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>indisputably true</q></p><p>you might want to tone down your confidence level there</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:25:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Carol Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227843#post227843</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227843#post227843</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Which is why public health advertising is rarely haranguing or accusatory.</q><br />Similarly, public health measures to reduce sun exposure are effective without being haranguing or accusatory. Shade and sunhat policies in schools, strong and unambiguous information about the risks of sun exposure (leaving aside for now the slightly thorny issue…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:23:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227842#post227842</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227842#post227842</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q><br />it is indisputably true that if every 65 y.o went out and shot themselves, that would be a very good thing for the state of the government books.<br /></q></p><p>It would also be a good thing (on that sole measure) to kill disabled people. Your point is?<br /><q><br />It was clear to…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:19:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Armstrong</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227841#post227841</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227841#post227841</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>it is indisputably true that if every 65 y.o went out and shot themselves, that would be a very good thing for the state of the government books.</q></p><p>This is totally disputable if you accept that it is impossible to fully quantify in economic terms all the benefits that experienced…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:04:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227840#post227840</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227840#post227840</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Well, yeah &ndash; I could be a thoroughly obnoxious sober alcoholic and euthanise what I laughingly call my social life by lecturing everyone with a drink in their hands about the social cost (and drain on the public purse) caused by alcohol abuse.</p><p>What that would achieve beyond a matching…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 09:44:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227839#post227839</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227839#post227839</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I think perhaps the problem with these sorts of arguments in general is that it's difficult for some people (not necessarily anyone here) to differentiate between righteous anger at tobacco companies and the structures which enable them, and (what I consider mostly pointless) seething resentment at the addicted person inconveniencing…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 09:35:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227838#post227838</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227838#post227838</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If you think that controlling an addictive disease that kills ten percent of New Zealanders and twenty five percent of Maori every year is unreasonable, then we have no common ground, and we can’t have a useful conversation.</q></p><p>I don't think there any useful conversation to be had when you're…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 09:33:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227836#post227836</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227836#post227836</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						No Sacha, it is indisputably true that if every 65 y.o went out and shot themselves, that would be a very good thing for the state of the government books. Of course, it would also be a bizarrely horrible thing to happen, and I would support massive state intervention to…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 09:26:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227834#post227834</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227834#post227834</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If you think that controlling an addictive disease that kills ten percent of New Zealanders and twenty five percent of Maori every year is unreasonable, then we have no common ground, and we can’t have a useful conversation</q></p><p>That's 10% of NZers and 25% of Maori *who die*, right? I'm…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 09:19:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227832#post227832</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227832#post227832</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Giving up on this. </p><p>If you think that controlling an addictive disease that kills ten percent of New Zealanders and twenty five percent of Maori every year is unreasonable, then we have no common ground, and we can't have a useful conversation.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 09:04:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227831#post227831</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227831#post227831</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>it is nonsense to disagree</q></p><p>the moon is also made of cheese</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 08:19:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227830#post227830</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227830#post227830</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The cost to society is not measured only by the public accounts.</p></blockquote><p>So whats the cost to society of lawyers for big corporations doing as Keith said:</p><blockquote><p>asking the Government to change the bill specifically so they’d have less of a case to prove when they sued the government.</p></blockquote><p>Seems…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 06:31:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jackie Clark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227829#post227829</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227829#post227829</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I think it's a;ll bullshit. There are cause celebres, and then there's shit no-one talks about. I just get sick of it. That is all.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 05:02:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Telfar Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227827#post227827</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227827#post227827</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I don't complain about the cost <em>to me</em> of smoking.  I complain about the cost to society of smoking.  The cost to society is not measured only by the public accounts.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 03:20:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227826#post227826</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227826#post227826</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>In other words: We don't stop providing healthcare to people aged over 65 because their superannuation bill will be less if they die earlier, and in the same way, we don't count it as a benefit if smokers die early and therefore incur a lower superannuation bill. </q></p><p>But purely from…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 01:45:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Telfar Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227821#post227821</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227821#post227821</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						For a good discussion of 'benefits' and transfers of smoking costs, see page 45 in <a href="http://www.sfc.org.nz/pdfs/TobTaxVolOneNovember.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this report</a>.  The important line is "It is perhaps unnecessary to add that our society should not and does not count as a 'benefit' any shortening of the life-span, and the evidence for this,…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 22:09:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227819#post227819</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227819#post227819</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Come, smoke vaguely near me in a park, you hapless addicted souls! I will happily move six inches to the left!</q></p><p>To be honest I appreciate the right and need for people to light up without being sneered at, whether it’s because they’re addicted or because they want to.  I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 21:24:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227807#post227807</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227807#post227807</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Maybe the $350 million smoking-related health bill you cited earlier could be redirected to other parts of the health system?</q></p><p>Maybe we'd have to spend way more on pensions if people stopped smoking and lived longer?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 18:37:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227783#post227783</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227783#post227783</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>As above, so below...</strong><br /><q>I think you’re asking this in good faith, <em>but I just don’t really feel like answering it, because it’s not especially relevant to the argument at hand.</em>  </q><br />Deja vu &ndash; how <em>Brash</em> of you...<br />see him do exactly this at about 6:30 in...<br />(watch the whole…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 14:28:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227765#post227765</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227765#post227765</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>feel like society is trying to punish you</q></p><p>which might be worth exploring, but probably not here.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 13:11:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227762#post227762</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227762#post227762</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q><br />Whether choice exists or not does not alter the morality of using punitive measures to influence the decision making process.<br /></q><br />And I've explained, that while measures cause you inconvenience, <strong>they are not punitive</strong>. They are preventative. They reduce consumption and reduce the likelihood of others smoking, and make it easier…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 13:07:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227757#post227757</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227757#post227757</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm sure Carrick can suggest some references..
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:57:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227756#post227756</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227756#post227756</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>it's not especially relevant to the argument at hand</q></p><p>Yeah I'm struggling to make sense of that one.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:56:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227755#post227755</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227755#post227755</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q><br />I’m not ignoring public health policy – I’m just not aware of it, it’s not my field, nor an interest of mine.<br /></q></p><p>Here’s a good place to start. World Health Organisation, <a href="http://www.who.int/topics/tobacco/en/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tobacco</a>. </p><p>Edit: actually, everyone in this debate could get something from the WHO's page. There are some extremely well…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:56:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227754#post227754</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227754#post227754</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the morality of using punitive measures to influence the decision making process</q></p><p>Fencing off private swimming pools, etc, might also be relevant comparisons &ndash; though 'punitive' might not be the right word. Language choices like that suggest an underlying belief system that is of some interest. Just not right now,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:55:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227750#post227750</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227750#post227750</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>certainly not now, as I absolutely have to get back to work</q></p><p>Same</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:51:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227749#post227749</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227749#post227749</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q><br />I just don’t really feel like answering it, because it’s not especially relevant to the argument at hand.<br /></q></p><p>If you want to talk about personal choice, but wont to talk about addiction, you’re just... [edited, unnecessarily harsh].</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:50:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227747#post227747</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227747#post227747</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I'd like to understand how you see the relationship between addiction and personal choice.</q></p><p>I think you're asking this in good faith, but I just don't really feel like answering it, because it's not especially relevant to the argument at hand. Whether choice exists or not does not alter the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:44:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227745#post227745</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227745#post227745</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>a win-no win for tobaccaddicts <br />&amp; a wind win for those downwind</strong><br />To keep the alfresco nightshade consumer happy  and still able to seek solace in the Solanaceae family, may I put in a plug for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chewing_tobacco" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">chewing tobacco</a> ...<br />&ndash; but please take a jar with you to spit in!</p><p>Sadly…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:41:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Armstrong</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227743#post227743</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227743#post227743</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It is indeed. Most smokers are rational adults. They are not mentally ill. They are not children.</q></p><p>Ben, you have asked everyone to enter this discussion in the spirit of openmindedness and willingness to understand an alternative view, but this just demonstrates that you are making no attempt to do…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:34:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227741#post227741</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227741#post227741</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I'm the apparently rare non-smoker who really doesn't give much of a shit about open-air smoking</q></p><p>I don't either, at that practical day-to-day level. It's just not where the harms or opportunities that motivate any public intervention lie. George explained the linkages quite adequately.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:24:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227740#post227740</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227740#post227740</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I'm not, however, convinced about the harms of this inflicted out of doors</q></p><p>What would it take to convince you? You seem to be simply ignoring well-established public health policy about tobacco and addiction.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:21:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227739#post227739</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227739#post227739</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>This rather reminds me of the breastfeeding discussion. "You individuals are doing something bad!" vs "this issue is far less to do with individual agency than it is structural!"</p><p>(In any case, I'm the apparently rare non-smoker who really doesn't give much of a shit about open-air smoking. Come, smoke…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:21:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Armstrong</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227738#post227738</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227738#post227738</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If it's in the public's interest, why is it so?</q></p><p>Maybe the $350 million smoking-related health bill you cited earlier could be redirected to other parts of the health system? Maybe the money spent on promoting 'stop smoking' campaigns could be spent elsewhere? Maybe smokers (a significant proportion of whom…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:18:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227737#post227737</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227737#post227737</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>His basic assumption (as I gather from what has been written here) is that much of tobacco policy is primarily punitive, driven not by health needs, but by a societal wish to sanction those who violate norms.</q></p><p>No, you are completely wrong about this. I simply disagree with the punitive…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:16:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>poffa</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227736#post227736</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227736#post227736</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I don't agree agree with the idea that smoking outside has no effect on others. What happens to the tonnes of ash flicked onto the ground and washed to the sea or is it that  all the nasties are now in the air. And butts after filtering the toxins they…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:14:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227735#post227735</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227735#post227735</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>a small part of the population</q></p><p>The last stats I saw – admittedly a few years ago – had smokers as about 20% of the general population and higher in some subgroups (esp. Maori and Pasifika women.) That’s not a majority, but it’s not “small” by any standard. Have numbers…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:12:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jackie Clark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227733#post227733</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227733#post227733</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						So George, acknowledging that secondhand smoke is dangerous, why do you want smokers to stop smoking? None of any of what you said above addresses quite why so much money is spent every year attempting to stop a small part of the population from partaking of a habit which, if…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 11:46:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227716#post227716</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227716#post227716</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I’m going save everyone the bother (warning, assumptions about others here, if symptoms persist see your doctor).</p><p>Ben is upset about being picked on. His basic assumption (as I gather from what has been written here) is that much of tobacco policy is primarily punitive, driven not by health needs,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 11:06:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227715#post227715</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227715#post227715</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If you think I said that, then you're not paying attention</q></p><p>I must have misunderstood <a href="http://publicaddress.net/system/topic/3205/?p=227627#post227627" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this</a>, for one:</p><p><q>I also think the aim of the taxes on smoking are simply sin-taxes, tickling an urge in puritans that I find quite unpleasant myself.</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 11:04:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227714#post227714</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227714#post227714</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Fucking Big Cleaners</q></p><p>great branding opportunity</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:59:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227713#post227713</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227713#post227713</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>if I get a sense that this debate is heading in a direction of attempting to understand each other</q></p><p>I'd like to understand how you see the relationship between addiction and personal choice.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:59:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>HORansome</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227705#post227705</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227705#post227705</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But there are things that I don't support. I might go into them later, if I get a sense that this debate is heading in a direction of attempting to understand each other, rather than preaching to the choir.</q></p><p>How very Owen Glenn of you.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:37:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227703#post227703</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227703#post227703</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Also, in the more common of the examples you've given (walking down stairs, wet floors) noone's making money off them.</q></p><p>Fucking Big Cleaners. Exploiting us by making floors wet that we have to walk on.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:22:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227692#post227692</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227692#post227692</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Cheers Jacks. That's how I see it, although I do think guilts might be more powerful than you credit, if coming from the right source at the right time. I just don't think that source is random strangers.</p><p><q>Ben, if your "moral" argument is that any anti-smoking action is just…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 09:34:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Telfar Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227690#post227690</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227690#post227690</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Oh, and one more thing:</p><p><q> It is a stretch for you to suggest that smokers have generally agreed to most of your positions here.</q></p><p>Quite the opposite.  New Zealand research has found tobacco control measures to be generally supported by smokers (see <a href="http://www.sfc.org.nz/pdfs/Edwardsetalregulation12-09.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 09:29:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Telfar Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227689#post227689</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227689#post227689</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I already said I don't disagree with banning it in buildings...but on the street, that I don't like.</q></p><p>I would like it very much.  So would my husband and my son and my daughter.  Why is what you like more important than what we like?</p><p><q>That's a tough one. It…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 09:28:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227688#post227688</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227688#post227688</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>No particulate place to go...</strong><br />a passing observation &ndash; Just went out to get the paper, as a school girl in uniform went by in a cloud of smoke &ndash; Puff the Magic Drag On brand must be doing well...</p><p><strong>tabagie...</strong><br />The French always have a word for these things...…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 09:28:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227687#post227687</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227687#post227687</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Yes, it is possible to smoke in a particularly obnoxious way. It's also very easy to point that out, which most smokers will take immediate note of, conveniently moving away, or extinguishing their cigarette.</q></p><p>My point is that outdoor cigarette smoke is ubiquitous in outdoor urban places at any time…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 09:20:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227683#post227683</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227683#post227683</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>As for the addiction question</q></p><p>Yeah, someone else can tackle that one if you're unwilling to do some reading. I have another meeting of the national cancer clinical information systems leadership group to prepare for this morning. (seriously).</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 08:03:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227682#post227682</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227682#post227682</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>smoking increases the probability of cancer</q></p><p>Smoking also has other health harms.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 07:58:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227681#post227681</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227681#post227681</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the claim is unproven, and could be bullshit</q></p><p>Sigh. It's not. Again, this is like arguing climate science or the roundness of the earth. There is a whole health discipline dedicated to tobacco harm, including health economists. With figures different than Jackie has just offered (but Carrick must be loving…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 07:55:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jackie Clark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227680#post227680</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227680#post227680</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Ah, the smokers argument. How much do smokers cost the taxpayer?  It's estimated, in dollar terms, at about $350million per annum. It is thought, however, that excise on tobacco products brings in about $1 billion dollars per annum. So there goes the economic argument. As for the social costs? Each…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 07:22:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>stever@cs.waikato.ac.nz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227679#post227679</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227679#post227679</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Sorry...back a bit to the property rights and planning...but <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/sep/05/george-osborne-motorway-sustainable-development " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> this piece</a> by Monbiot seems very applicable here too.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 07:01:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227676#post227676</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227676#post227676</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>Argumentum ad hominem</em> ... and even less than that, because it's based on assumption or projection.  Exactly how much have I been drinking tonight?  Do tell.  </p><p>Ah, but of course, your post is explicitly a pretext for a withdrawal.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:55:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227675#post227675</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227675#post227675</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>generally it is broken by choice, if it is broken at all.</q></p><p>Not without help... and over a long time.  "Choice" is a very simplistic concept as you present it.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:52:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227674#post227674</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227674#post227674</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						OIC, you're drunk and belligerent again. 'Night all.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:51:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227673#post227673</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227673#post227673</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Find where I said what you accuse me of here</q></p><p>Already done.  I won’t redundantly elaborate.</p><p><q>I haven’t even spoken about people who have had to deal with loved ones who are dying!</q></p><p>Indeed you haven’t, because it has not even occurred to you.  It’s all very well to talk…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:44:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227672#post227672</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227672#post227672</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I’m sorry, but that just strikes me as defensive, and a little bit smug. An immediate family member whom I love is dying of cancer, another might yet. To talk about these people as if they were “burdens” is disrespectful.</q></p><p>Defensive, yes. It's what happens when I'm accused of disrespect.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:34:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227671#post227671</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227671#post227671</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Wrong. Most of the harms I experience from smokers come from sharing a publicly-funded health system with them. Not because they offend my nose or pollute my lungs.</q></p><p>This shows an ignorance of probability.</p><p>Granted, smoking increases the probability of cancer substantially, but that does not mean that all cancer…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:18:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227668#post227668</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227668#post227668</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Sacha, you <em>raised</em> the economic argument <a href="http://publicaddress.net/system/topic/3205/?p=227564#post227564" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>. I <em>refuted</em> it <a href="http://publicaddress.net/system/topic/3205/?p=227569#post227569" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>, by saying:<br /><q>My argument is not economic. It's moral. But I think the cost of smokers in a country that has superannuation is not what you think. It's quite cost effective, really, because it kills off people mostly after…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:03:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227667#post227667</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227667#post227667</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Wrong. Most of the harms I experience from smokers come from sharing a publicly-funded health system with them. Not because they offend my nose or pollute my lungs.</q></p><p>Smokers die younger, but they don't age faster. So they work until 65, like non smokers, paying taxes all the time, and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:02:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227665#post227665</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227665#post227665</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Show me anywhere I’ve been disrespectful.</q></p><p>I’m sorry, but that just strikes me as defensive, and a little bit smug.  An immediate family member whom I love is dying of cancer, another might yet.  To talk about these people as if they were “burdens” <em>is</em> disrespectful.</p><p>You don’t have to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 23:40:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227664#post227664</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227664#post227664</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Show me anywhere I've been disrespectful. </q></p><p>Treating people as economic facts or logical constructions tends to offend fellow humans.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 23:28:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227662#post227662</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227662#post227662</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>A smoker alone in an open air public place is harming no one else.</q></p><p>Wrong. Most of the harms I experience from smokers come from sharing a publicly-funded health system with them. Not because they offend my nose or pollute my lungs.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 23:26:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227661#post227661</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227661#post227661</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>@izogi<br /><q>Avoiding it, for anyone who wants to, is a lot to ask.</q></p><p>I never seem to have the slightest trouble.</p><p>@kracklite<br /><q>Please don’t be so glib – there are real effects</q></p><p>I've not denied that.</p><p><q>A little taste and tact please? They’re not mere societal conventions, they’re founded on…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 23:19:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Armstrong</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227659#post227659</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227659#post227659</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>or go all quiet, as is the more common practice in this particularly polite debating club.</q></p><p>As a minor contributor to this discussion I guess you probably aren't taking about me, but I feel obliged to say that I've just got back from seeing Fire in Babylon at the Hamilton…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 23:09:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227656#post227656</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227656#post227656</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						"No man is an island" is an appealing rejoinder as ice caps melt and sea levels rise..
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 22:28:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Carol Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227655#post227655</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227655#post227655</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>as arguing about climate change &ndash; also a popular libertarian sport</q><br />An interesting comparison as accusations of puritanism are also bandied about on this topic, usually in relation to people who advocate for urgent action to reduce carbon emissions.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 22:26:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227654#post227654</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227654#post227654</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Socrates was a dick</q></p><p>Well, we mostly have Plato’s word on Socrates, and Plato definitely was a dick.  If I had a time machine, a rifle and a convenient grassy knoll…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 22:23:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>HORansome</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227653#post227653</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227653#post227653</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I'm defining the smokers I'm talking about in this sentence as ones who aren't harming people, and saying corralling them is not good.</q></p><p>I think part of the problem in this debate is that we don't think your group (the smokers who harm no one) actually exist and thus we…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 22:16:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227652#post227652</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227652#post227652</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'd echo that, having farewelled someone this year. Reducing suffering is an all too human benefit in itself, regardless of dollars or other numbers.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 22:15:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>HORansome</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227651#post227651</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227651#post227651</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It's how the whole thing started. Read any Plato...</q></p><p>It might be how it started, but it's not how it's done now. Most of us contemporary philosophers think Socrates was a dick.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 22:14:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227650#post227650</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227650#post227650</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I accept that smoking kills people</q></p><p>Causes broader harms than just that (which have burdens/costs). </p><p><em>snap</em></p><p>None of this is unsettled stuff, so it makes about as much sense to me as arguing about climate change &ndash; also a popular libertarian sport. Perhaps an explanation of why (from that perspective)…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 22:11:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227649#post227649</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227649#post227649</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>a) I accept that smoking kills people. I’m not sure how much of a burden this actually is, since everyone dies in the end, and people with shorter lives could easily burden it less. <br /></q></p><p>I’ll restrain my anger over that last phrase and attribute it to your naiveté.</p><p>The care…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 22:09:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227646#post227646</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227646#post227646</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Like smoking out of doors, where the volume of air into which the smoke dissipates is enormous. It's a very long way from the harm generated by passive smoking to just disliking an odour that you are sensitive to. On that one, unless in, say, an actual crowd, it seems…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 22:03:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Carol Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227645#post227645</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227645#post227645</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It's taxed to discourage it</q><br />But that's hardly the same as a sin tax, if there are sound reasons to discourage it, which I think have been demonstrated here.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 22:02:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>HORansome</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227642#post227642</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227642#post227642</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What public utility? Please be clear which one you're talking about here, I don't want the above confusion to re-occur.</q></p><p>Societal goods. Utility to society as a whole. You know, the main factor in most modern forms of utilitarianism when it comes to discussion of public policy.</p><p>I think you're…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 21:47:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227641#post227641</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227641#post227641</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Oh, for goodness' sake. a) do you accept that smoking imposes burdens on the public health system and b) do you not think perhaps the aim of these taxes is to offset these costs?</q></p><p>a) I accept that smoking kills people. I'm not sure how much of a burden this…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 21:42:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew E</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227638#post227638</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227638#post227638</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>At the risk of getting burnt by real philosphers, and people who have done real research in this field, I'll jump in to this debate.</p><p><q> b) do you not think perhaps the aim of these taxes is to offset these costs?</q></p><p>Arguably, the reason why governments don't ban tobacco is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 21:23:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227637#post227637</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227637#post227637</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I do factor in a smoker's enjoyment (that's why I said "limited private utility").</q></p><p>No wonder I missed it. To call something that you do 20-odd times a day and get genuine pleasure from "limited private utility" caused me confusion. I apologize for suggesting you forgot the actual theory, but…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 21:21:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Carol Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227635#post227635</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227635#post227635</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I also think the aim of the taxes on smoking are simply sin-taxes</q><br />Oh, for goodness' sake. a) do you accept that smoking imposes burdens on the public health system and b) do you not think perhaps the aim of these taxes is to offset these costs? </p><p><q>You know I…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 20:51:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>HORansome</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227633#post227633</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227633#post227633</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>You don't seem to account at all for the enjoyment that smokers get from what they are doing. Both the actual smoking, and also the freedom to choose to smoke, which has a big rebel factor in it. Furthermore, they really enjoy it, in a lot of cases. I'm surprised…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 20:36:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227630#post227630</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227630#post227630</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the freedom to choose to smoke, which has a big rebel factor in it</q></p><p>again, you're ignoring addiction. <br />more rebellious to choose tofu</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 20:28:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227629#post227629</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227629#post227629</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>that was a killer live</q></p><p>assuredly</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 20:26:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227627#post227627</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227627#post227627</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Your initial response to the fact that tobacco kills people was to wave it away, and then it was to say that old people are a burden to the state and we're better off economically without them.</q></p><p>No, and no. I don't "wave it away". I consider it an important…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 20:20:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>HORansome</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227618#post227618</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227618#post227618</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Having actually looked up the word consensus, I'm rather surprised to find it doesn't mean unanimity. </q></p><p>That's a problem Climate Change Deniers have been suffering from for a long time. :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:44:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227614#post227614</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227614#post227614</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Here in non-crowded, temperate, windy NZ</q></p><p>I’m not convinced the most relevant factors are about the size of the crowd so much as the nature of our urban layouts that place smokers into walking corridors which <em>everyone</em> uses with people who are smoking, or encourages them to stand near doorways…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:37:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Grigg</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227610#post227610</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227610#post227610</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Far more annoying was being heckled to watch sex-acts, but each to their own.</q></p><p>See, I don't walk down those couple of streets that often/ever. </p><p>The skywalks in particular don't offer the upward dispersion as they have trains running above them. The clouds of smoke that filled the air up…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:29:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Graham</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227609#post227609</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227609#post227609</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>That again, is ill informed. Quite apart from the horror inflicted on those who suffer through their last years and those who lose family members much earlier than they otherwise would (13 years earlier, among men, 14, among women), the costs of end-of-life healthcare, particularly for cancers, is extreme. A…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:26:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>HORansome</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227607#post227607</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227607#post227607</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> In fact, I don't even come from a rights based angle at all. I'm a much simpler kind of Utilitarian.</q></p><p>Well, if you're a utilitarian, then I think you should be agreeing with us rather than disagreeing. The public utility of restricting tobacco use (better living, everyone!) is a good…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:21:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227605#post227605</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227605#post227605</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I find an endless cloud of toxic smoke that I have to walk through on a stinking hot still day rather uncool too.</q></p><p>Yes, when I went to Bangkok, every time I blew my nose it was black. But that wasn't because of smokers. I gather this has improved, though?…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:00:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227604#post227604</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227604#post227604</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I'm not denying the right of people to puff away anywhere where I don't have to suffer it, but surrounding my head with smoke is never cool. My asthmatic friends also applaud the wardens.</q></p><p>I'm not qualified to comment on health effects, but I definitely agree with the prevalence of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 18:56:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Grigg</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227603#post227603</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227603#post227603</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>As an aside, I'd like to thank Mr Grigg for my current soundtrack (#6, oh yeah)</q></p><p>As I recall, that was a killer live, no?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 18:47:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227601#post227601</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227601#post227601</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q><br />The authorities here have gone out of the way to improve the air and the water (which is now mostly tap-drinkable). Making the public areas of the city walk-able is another part of the overall grand vision I guess. I’m not sure how that becomes uncool when seen from afar…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 18:27:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227600#post227600</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227600#post227600</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						As an aside, I'd like to thank Mr Grigg for my current soundtrack (#6, oh yeah)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 18:22:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227598#post227598</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227598#post227598</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Tell me something that I haven't engaged with, and I'll happily engage with it. </q></p><p>I don't believe you have engaged with the impact of addiction on choice &ndash; but I've already recognised you may need better information to do that with. And I don't have any to point you at…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 18:20:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227597#post227597</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227597#post227597</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q><br />Tell me something that I haven’t engaged with, and I’ll happily engage with it.<br /></q><br />Your initial response to the fact that tobacco kills people was to wave it away, and then it was to say that old people are a burden to the state and we're better off economically without…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 18:19:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Grigg</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227596#post227596</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227596#post227596</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>OK, it's upthread some ways, but I only got into this because Simon Grigg suggested that in Thailand there are people who will actually make you stop smoking in public outdoor places. I really don't think that's cool at all.</q></p><p>I find an endless cloud of toxic smoke that I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 18:14:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227595#post227595</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227595#post227595</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Unless you are a libertarian, and believe that liberty (insomuch as it can exist when people have been misled and then addicted to a commercial product) trumps all other rights and interest claims &ndash; there's no way for a non-libertarian to engage a libertarian coherently, because the premises are so…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 18:12:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227594#post227594</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227594#post227594</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>You're part of a minority.</q></p><p>Having actually looked up the word consensus, I'm rather surprised to find it doesn't mean unanimity. I'll concede this one. I guess I've only ever been in consensus decision making situations that did end up being unanimous. That is, however, probably on account of the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 18:10:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227593#post227593</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227593#post227593</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Perhaps I don't think you're arguing from bad faith, but I feel like you're not engaging with what I or others are saying.</p><p>I'm also aware that my last paragraph is an appeal to authority, but I do think that if you're going to argue that there is no compelling…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 18:09:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227590#post227590</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227590#post227590</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>So I quote myself:<br /><q><br />If you mean where does the reach of public health end for other harmful activities, I have no idea. There is a societal consensus for the control of tobacco, but there are no such strong consensus for the control of other potentially harmful products and activities,…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:49:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227587#post227587</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227587#post227587</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q><br />They’re an appeal to prejudice<br /></q></p><p>Ben, you're the first person I've ever met, offline or on, who has referred to the evidence on tobacco as an "appeal to prejudice".</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:41:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227585#post227585</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227585#post227585</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q><br />Consensus is a strange word for a position that is contentious.<br /></q><br />You're <a href="http://www.hsc.org.nz/publications/2011/public-opinion-about-tobacco-control-regulation-fact?destination=%2Fresearchpublications.html%3Fpage%3D3" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">part of a minority</a>.<br /><q><br />In 2010, around two-thirds (65%) of <br />respondents ‘agreed’ (39%) or ‘strongly <br />agreed’ (26%) that the government should <br />do more to reduce the harm done by <br />smoking<br /></q><br />Now, being part of the minority doesn't make…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:38:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227584#post227584</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227584#post227584</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>In a very dragged out and expensive way though, is it not?</q></p><p>and from George,</p><p><q>the costs of end-of-life healthcare, particularly for cancers, is extreme.</q></p><p>Convince me you've done the number on this. Considering that everyone dies in the end, and the better our healthcare gets, the more likely it…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:34:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227583#post227583</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227583#post227583</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>My argument is not economic. It's moral.</q></p><p>Applying limited public health and social resources to treat smokers (or drinkers, for instance) means those resources are not available for other people. There seem to be moral implications..</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:28:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227582#post227582</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227582#post227582</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The main thing about boats, unlike smoking, is that you can easily kill other people with them.</q></p><p>Fatal second-hand smoke effects exist.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:25:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227580#post227580</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227580#post227580</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I thought you were being sincere. So I addressed tobacco.</q></p><p>I was being sincere, but I can see that I didn't make the question plain enough. My bad.</p><p><q>If you mean where does the reach of public health end for other harmful activities, I have no idea. </q></p><p>Yes, that was…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:22:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Armstrong</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227579#post227579</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227579#post227579</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>that doesn't mean you have to be restricted where you appreciate your impacting good.</q></p><p>Ya lost me.</p><p><q>I don't think it's of much relevance in the zealotry surrounding anti-smoking legislation.</q></p><p>I agree, it's not a major factor, but was just addressing your objection. </p><p><q>I think the whole thing is deeply…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:21:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227577#post227577</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227577#post227577</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>BAT out of Hell…</strong><br />British American Tobacco are regular winners or finalists in CAFCA’s  annual <a href="http://www.converge.org.nz/watchdog/20/03.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Roger Awards</a>.<br />If corporations like this want the rights of individuals how can we find out how much tax (and how much Excise money) BAT has paid the NZ Government over the years?<br />And also…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:06:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227576#post227576</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227576#post227576</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q><br /> It’s quite cost effective, really, because it kills off people mostly after their productive life ends. <br /></q></p><p>That again, is ill informed. Quite apart from the horror inflicted on those who suffer through their last years and those who lose family members much earlier than they otherwise would (13 years earlier,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:06:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227575#post227575</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227575#post227575</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But I think the cost of smokers in a country that has superannuation is not what you think. It's quite cost effective, really, because it kills off people mostly after their productive life ends.</q></p><p>In a very dragged out and expensive way though, is it not?  Smoker deaths don't usually…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:05:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227574#post227574</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227574#post227574</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But I thought that HORansome's point was that smoking also has broader environmental and social impacts.</q></p><p>And my response was that practically everything does, and that doesn't mean you have to be restricted where you appreciate your impacting good. You don't have to leave the CBD to put on your…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:02:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227573#post227573</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227573#post227573</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q><br />Just not to the question actually asked.<br /></q></p><p>I thought you were being sincere. So I addressed tobacco.</p><p>If you mean where does the reach of public health end for other harmful activities, I have no idea. There is a societal consensus for the control of tobacco, but there are no…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:02:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Armstrong</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227571#post227571</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227571#post227571</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>This is a poor argument for it, though.</q></p><p>No, its a stupid argument.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:55:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Armstrong</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227570#post227570</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227570#post227570</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>That's not harm the smoker is doing to anyone, any more than the shirt you wear on your back from China does the person sitting next to you any harm</q></p><p>That's a confusing argument. I think you're mixing up immediate and long-term effects. Secondhand smoke clearly has implications for the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:53:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227569#post227569</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227569#post227569</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>That's my speculative answer.</q></p><p>Just not to the question actually asked.</p><p><q>Because both those activities are not addictive</q></p><p>Indeed, that's why they would need to be forced to do it. For their own good.</p><p><q>If determined to take a 'rational' economic approach</q></p><p>My argument is not economic. It's moral. But…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:46:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227564#post227564</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227564#post227564</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If there was a clear rationale for why such interference doesn't extend to forcing citizens to eat well and exercise, then let's hear it.</q></p><p>Because both those activities are not addictive. As I say, you really do not seem to understand what that means. In the nicest possible way, I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:31:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227562#post227562</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227562#post227562</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q><br />Where does it end? <br /></q></p><p>With plain-packaged cartons costing $40, that you buy from restricted retailers (chemists, mostly) and are free to smoke in your own home and property... and 2-5% of the population smoking. That's my speculative answer.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:29:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227558#post227558</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227558#post227558</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It doesn't make sense to pay 200 dollars for 30 grams of tobacco unless you are amazingly rich. </q></p><p>No, especially since a thousand seeds costs about $2.50 (and they will drop their own seeds from then on), and they're basically plant-and-forget, being a very hardy plant, well adapted to NZ,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:07:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227557#post227557</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227557#post227557</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I think it's paternalistic and therefore unjustified, just so you know. It's a very slippery slope, legislating against self-harming. Where does it end? If there was a clear rationale for why such interference doesn't extend to forcing citizens to eat well and exercise, then let's hear it.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:04:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227553#post227553</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227553#post227553</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q><br /> The taxes and restrictions are motivated entirely by moralizing about the health risks.<br /></q><br />To the extent that popularly elected governments take measures to protect the health of their citizens, and those measures impose on the freedoms of those citizens, yes, absolutely. </p><p>Whether you view those measures as; paternalistic and unjustified,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:53:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227552#post227552</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227552#post227552</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I’m pretty sure thrill is addictive to some people.</q></p><p>It’s on a tangent but there’s <a href="http://www.alpinist.com/doc/web07f/rb-erik-monasterio-mountaineering-medicine" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">some interesting research from within New Zealand</a> around the skewed risk-tolerance with people who are into things like mountain climbing and base jumping.  His sample of 50 committed and experienced mountain climbers had a 10%…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:51:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227547#post227547</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227547#post227547</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What about secondhand smoke?</q></p><p>I already said I don't disagree with banning it in buildings...but on the street, that I don't like.</p><p><q>What about secondhand smoke? The environmental impact (not just of smoking but the production of cigarettes)? The terrible working conditions in the plantations where tobacco is grown and…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:24:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227539#post227539</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227539#post227539</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>no ifs, lotsa butts...</strong><br /><q>A lot of us enjoy smoking, but let’s not turn a blind eye to the consequences of that habit. Smoking doesn’t just adversely affect the lives of smokers.</q><br />indeed, those butts can be <a href="http://adsoftheworld.com/files/images/NoButts_2_Fish_200dpi.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">piscatorially pesky...</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:50:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>HORansome</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227522#post227522</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227522#post227522</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>There's something fucked up about making the lives of people who do no harm to anyone else difficult, I dislike it where ever I see it.</q></p><p>Smoking, as an activity on the part of a smoker, does no harm to others? Really? What about secondhand smoke? The environmental impact (not…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 13:54:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Butler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227511#post227511</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227511#post227511</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Coming to think of it this reads ominously like a Seasteader's anthem, especially given Peter Thiel's obsession with anti-geriatric medicine:</p><p><q>In that bright land, there'll be no hunger,<br />no orphan children cryin' for bread,<br />no weeping widows, toil or struggle,<br />no shrouds, no coffins, and no death.</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 13:02:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Butler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227506#post227506</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227506#post227506</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> <em>There is no depression in New Zealand</em> </q></p><p>Or the original <a href="http://www.traditionalmusic.co.uk/carter-family-songs/No%20Depression%20In%20Heaven.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">"No Depression"</a>:</p><p><q>I’m going where there’s no resource consent process,<br />to the lovely land that’s free from abrogations of my property rights.</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 12:54:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227495#post227495</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227495#post227495</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>satirically titled Don Brash speeches, plundering the best lines from centuries of protest literature</q></p><p><em>There is no depression in New Zealand</em></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:45:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Rowe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227492#post227492</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227492#post227492</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Am now looking forward (not) to a series of satirically titled Don Brash speeches, plundering the best lines from centuries of protest literature. "A spectre is haunting New Zealand"; "If I can't dance, I don't want to be part of your fiscal strategy", etc.</q></p><p>Saturday Night's Alright For Introducing Vouchers…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:41:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227490#post227490</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227490#post227490</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>With respect, I'm not sure you understand how addiction works.</q></p><p>Perhaps not. It's really hard to say. Many people have kicked addiction, by exercising choice. It seems to be one of the most successful ways, in fact. People who don't want to quit are the main ones who don't quit,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:36:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227488#post227488</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227488#post227488</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						O sure. I should say that in certain places and certain times I think tobacco is a very attractive illegal commodity, and even in NZ I would expect a small but thriving black market. I do think it would be small, compared both to current consumption and even pot consumption.…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:33:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227487#post227487</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227487#post227487</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>change might actually not be so far away</q></p><p>Only if the right approach can wrest power from the well-resourced interests defending the status quo. That's going to take far more competent organising that we've seen so far &ndash; and fresher ideas than street marches and brochures. Aslo means tapping the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:31:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Armstrong</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227484#post227484</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227484#post227484</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>You can see why I'm not holding my breath..</q></p><p>Part of my bubbling theory is that change might actually not be so far away. Peak oil might alter more than where we go to buy fuel for our cars.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:28:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227477#post227477</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227477#post227477</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It's a problem, in the way that file sharing is a problem &ndash; it deprives revenue from those who would collect it (the tax system, and the Government). However, as a public health problem, not so much. </q></p><p>A good point.  However, like some aspects of piracy (as opposed to peer-to-peer…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:17:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227476#post227476</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227476#post227476</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						for health reasons, you understand :)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:17:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227475#post227475</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227475#post227475</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>You can see why I'm not holding my breath</q></p><p>Because you, like Bill Clinton, didn't inhale?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:14:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227473#post227473</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227473#post227473</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>also the broader social and cultural issues that impinge on the personal and emotional ones</q></p><p>Totally. You can see why I'm not holding my breath..</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:57:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Armstrong</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227472#post227472</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227472#post227472</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>tackling the emotional and personal development issues that all addiction sits on.</q></p><p>Yep, but also the broader social and cultural issues that impinge on the personal and emotional ones. You know, capitalism and liberalism elevating the individual over the collective, the trope that happiness comes from getting rather than giving,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:42:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227471#post227471</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227471#post227471</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>They still have to decide</q></p><p>With respect, I'm not sure you understand how addiction works.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:37:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227470#post227470</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227470#post227470</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q></p><p>Tobacco related illness. Gods but I hate that expression. Of course everyone dies of tobacco related illnesses: strokes and heart attacks and a lot of cancers are related to tobacco use, and that’s what most people die of anyway, smokers and non-smokers alike.<br /></q><br />Well, be prepared to hate it some…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:36:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227468#post227468</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227468#post227468</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Good luck separating those.</q></p><p>Can't be done. You can show people that it's both harmful and addictive. They still have to decide if the harm outweighs whatever the drivers of the addiction are, which aren't just the fear of physical cravings. They're actual pleasure in the use of the substance.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:27:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227467#post227467</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227467#post227467</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q><br />Tobacco smuggling in Europe is a big problem.</p><p>Google 'tobacco smuggling in the UK'. Here's a couple of examples from the results<br /></q></p><p>It's a problem, in the way that file sharing is a problem &ndash; it deprives revenue from those who would collect it (the tax system, and the Government).…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:24:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227458#post227458</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227458#post227458</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I'd love to hear a bit more about this</q></p><p>Same. I'm thinking about us tackling the emotional and personal development issues that all addiction sits on. Needs a big investment in mental health, counselling, and other wellbeing services. Imagine the productivity and social gains from say $1b spent on that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:11:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227456#post227456</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227456#post227456</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The problem with tobacco isn't the addictiveness, it's the health harm that it causes.</q></p><p>Good luck separating those.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:08:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227451#post227451</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227451#post227451</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Noone pretends those things aren’t dangerous. What’s the difference? They’re not addictive. Also, in the more common of the examples you’ve given (walking down stairs, wet floors) noone’s making money off them. Furthermore, ALL causes of injury accounted for about 4500 deaths each year in 2005 and 2006 (from my…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:53:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227437#post227437</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227437#post227437</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>    Know what's dangerous? Skydiving. Mountain climbing. Flying light aircraft. Adventure tourism. Walking down stairs. Wet floors. Ice.</p><p>Noone pretends those things aren't dangerous. What's the difference? They're not addictive.</q></p><p>I'm pretty sure thrill is addictive to some people. Addictive is a difficult word &ndash; for most things that aren't illegal,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:06:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227436#post227436</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227436#post227436</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Tobacco smuggling in Europe is a big problem.</p><p>Google 'tobacco smuggling in the UK'. Here's a couple of examples from the results:</p><p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/1169049.stm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/1169049.stm</a></p><p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/insideout/southeast/series6/smugglers.shtml" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.bbc.co.uk/insideout/southeast/series6/smugglers.shtml</a></p><p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/6110778/Revealed-2bn-cost-to-UK-from-cigarette-smuggling.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/6110778/Revealed-2bn-cost-to-UK-from-cigarette-smuggling.html</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:05:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Armstrong</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227435#post227435</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227435#post227435</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Or we could invest properly in solving the drivers of all addiction, which I'd prefer.</q></p><p>Risking a threadjack here, but I'd love to hear a bit more about this. Feeding my own bubbling theories you see..</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:00:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jolisa</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227427#post227427</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227427#post227427</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Am now looking forward (not) to a series of satirically titled Don Brash speeches, plundering the best lines from centuries of protest literature. "A spectre is haunting New Zealand"; "If I can't dance, I don't want to be part of your fiscal strategy", etc.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 05:03:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jolisa</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227426#post227426</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227426#post227426</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>P.S. Don Brash, I know you’re too busy to keep up with popular music the kids listen to these days, but I’m pretty sure the lyrics go “this land is your land, this land is my land”, not “this land is your land, so you can tell everyone else to…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 05:00:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Grigg</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227424#post227424</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227424#post227424</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Um. Only if all Indonesians were male. Also, 2006 figures put adult male smoking prevalence in Indonesia at 61.7% and female at 5%.<br />Seems like plenty of scope to pick up more smokers to me.</q></p><p>Good luck trying to survey such things in Indonesia. The 60% figure often quoted comes…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 04:04:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227423#post227423</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227423#post227423</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I’m not thinking black or white. You could treat it the way people are suggesting for the other smokable crop – make it legal to grow but not to mass-market.</q></p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:TobaccoYield.png" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">This graphic</a> suggests that New Zealand's climate probably isn't great for tobacco growth (if we're talking about people growing it…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 03:30:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227421#post227421</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227421#post227421</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hmm. I have to say, I doubt that tobacco would be a very viable black market commodity. Let's take the classic ounce. That's 30 grams of pot more or less. Retail value is around 300-4oo dollars, depending on quality and location. Port Royal retails for 30-40 dollars per 30 grams.…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 01:30:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227419#post227419</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227419#post227419</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I dont often approve +1 infinity but I do here Ross- there's a scifi short story I forget author&amp;title of, but it revolves round the idea that the only &ndash; &amp; limited- celebration left for the sad remanant of humanity was acknowledging "Our ancestors were pigs!"<br />Which we are not of course…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:35:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Telfar Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227417#post227417</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227417#post227417</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It would be hard to pick up more smokers in Indonesia &ndash; close to 80% of all males smoke...</q> Um.  Only if all Indonesians were male.  Also, 2006 figures put adult male smoking prevalence in Indonesia at 61.7% and female at 5%.<br />Seems like plenty of scope to pick up…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 23:33:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ross Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227412#post227412</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227412#post227412</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I did get the impression he was focusing on land property rights. You know, those ones that say I can do what I like with my piece of dirt. Dig it up, sell the topsoil and sell it back to me when I buy one of their sections, shit in…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 23:02:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227411#post227411</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227411#post227411</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So when Christians say that cannabis (or tobacco or opium poppies for that matter) should not be grown are they saying God made a mistake?</q></p><p>You could argue the 'mistake' is in the humans. The plants are just fine.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 22:58:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Carol Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227407#post227407</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227407#post227407</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Know what's dangerous? Skydiving. Mountain climbing. Flying light aircraft. Adventure tourism. Walking down stairs. Wet floors. Ice. Not cigarettes, which are less dangerous than things still promoted locally as health tonics, like red wine.</q></p><p>That is such bullshit. How many people die per year from skydiving, mountain climbing, flying light…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 22:45:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227405#post227405</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227405#post227405</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I'm not thinking black or white. You could treat it the way people are suggesting for the other smokable crop &ndash; make it legal to grow but not to mass-market. </p><p>Or we could invest properly in solving the drivers of all addiction, which I'd prefer. Just not naive enough to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 22:31:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bmk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227404#post227404</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227404#post227404</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Banning would just set up another war on drugs, for a substance which already has a colossal number of addicts. You’re going to make criminals out of a billion people. I think that’s crazy.</q></p><p>I completely agree. The world is finally waking up to the futility of marijuana being illegal…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 22:22:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bmk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227401#post227401</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227401#post227401</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I am guessing this is because it is as you say semi-legal. If it were fully legal then the companies could mass-produce it and market/distribute it. I mean if I were a cannabis smoker I would prefer to be able to buy a package of pre-rolled joint of consistent quantity…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 22:13:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227397#post227397</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227397#post227397</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I have been known to enjoy the odd cigar. I'm just being selfish. But seriously, it's one of the easiest plants to grow. Banning would just set up another war on drugs, for a substance which already has a colossal number of addicts. You're going to make criminals out of…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 21:45:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Grigg</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227396#post227396</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227396#post227396</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>by that time Marijuana should be legal and they will be ready and in place to produce, market and distribute that product.</q></p><p>It's semi legal in big parts of the world now, and this hasn't happened and seems unlikely to. Mostly, given their cloudy duplicitous histories, they would likely have…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 21:42:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bmk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227392#post227392</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227392#post227392</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Tobacco companies don’t need to change their business plans. Because if tobacco were ever made illegal or people were simply to stop smoking (both of which I think are highly unlikely) by that time Marijuana should be legal and they will be ready and in place to produce, market and…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 21:24:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Scott A</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227387#post227387</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227387#post227387</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Just putting it out there, my (limited) understanding is that land that grows the more pungent variety of tobacco can also grow good hop varieties.  And we're suffering a world-wide shortage of hops.</p><p>Make beer not cigarettes!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 20:59:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227386#post227386</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227386#post227386</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						No, it fucking isn't OK. I'm a decriminalisation advocate for ALL substances. So I'd love it if no one's mother had to do that, actually.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 20:45:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227384#post227384</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227384#post227384</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						But it's OK for someone else's mother to be forced to do that for a similar product with far fewer harmful effects and recorded deaths?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 20:41:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227383#post227383</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227383#post227383</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Because I don't want my retired mother visiting gang houses to pick up cigarettes?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 20:30:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227382#post227382</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-sock-puppeting-big-tobacco-to-chew/?p=227382#post227382</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I still think the 'orrible stuff should be legal.</q></p><p>Why? It's the only product that when used exactly as intended kills half of its users.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 20:16:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
