<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | OnPoint: Easy as 1, 2, 22.8 billion</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223450#post223450</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223450#post223450</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I believe I posted this on an inferior site not long ago.</p><p>I'm predicting 12% for the Greens this time, level by 2014 and that they will lead the government after the 2017 election unless the Nats (by then incorporating ACT) work out an ingenious way to steal it.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 21:14:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223444#post223444</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223444#post223444</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Watch for Labour/Green/Southern Maori coalition-<br />death to Ngats!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 19:59:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223439#post223439</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223439#post223439</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yes i heard this on the radio newz./</p><p>They could overtake Labour as the main opposition party.</p><p>They seem more onto it.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 19:18:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223406#post223406</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223406#post223406</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						So the Nats think encouraging KiwiSaver is <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10742729" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">worth considering</a>. I'm actually glad they're doing this, because it makes fucking sense. Pity Labour didn't have the guts to get there first, and now coming out with a better scheme is behind the 8-ball. But I think that the CGT move might have…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 16:11:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JLM</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223354#post223354</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223354#post223354</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>This is news only for the week ending Friday July 29, 2011</p><p>The minimum wage needs a lift – it is the best way to boost an economy that has been mismanaged along the lines of a wait and see approach on the basis that it can’t stay bad forever.…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 12:48:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223332#post223332</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223332#post223332</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>getting media training</q></p><p>I doubt any journos are fond of that</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 11:05:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223314#post223314</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223314#post223314</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I would have to know, before I could comment, what was the basis of her doing it and how and why Wellington Council approved the expenditure.</p><p>It does read like a media fishslapping contest.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 06:55:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223313#post223313</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223313#post223313</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>It comes down to semantics &ndash; "he didn't spend the money" &amp; " it wasn't for his benefit".</p><p>It is a non issue.</p><p>I do, however, have a problem with his Helicopter use.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 06:50:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223310#post223310</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223310#post223310</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I’m Ok with it – it is not a big deal and money well spent.</q></p><p>Then why does <a href="http://brianedwardsmedia.co.nz/2011/07/sean-plunket-writes-a-disparaging-column-about-judy-and-me-in-the-dom-post-and-i-reply/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">a certain ex-RadioNZ talkback host have a beef</a> with Wellington’s mayor getting media training at public expense? Is it simply him being himself and shooting from the hip?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 01:37:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223272#post223272</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223272#post223272</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						So that's a lie that's ok eh?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 18:54:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223262#post223262</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223262#post223262</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm Ok with it &ndash; it is not a big deal and money well spent.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 17:42:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223145#post223145</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223145#post223145</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Extraordinary story in the news tonight about Key and his people paying a PR firm $10,000 (of taxpayers’ money) to get on the US Letterman show in 2009.</q></p><p>Key goes on to say that they paid no-one to get him on letterman. He explains this by saying that they retain…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 12:35:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223142#post223142</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223142#post223142</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What income and equity level do you set as “Rich”?.</q></p><p>I don't have to, NBR publishes a list for us.<br />:-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 12:30:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223090#post223090</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223090#post223090</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>video killed the rodeo tsar...</strong><br /><q>Key and his people paying a PR firm $10,000 (of taxpayers’ money) to get on the US Letterman show in 2009</q><br />Another PR coup orchestrated by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hill_%26_Knowlton#Controversies" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hill &amp; Knowlton</a>, well known for spinning such toxic winners as BCCI, the Tobacco Industry and the Govt of Kuwait…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 21:47:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223086#post223086</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223086#post223086</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Heh!<br />Love it!<br />(And, o yeah, understand other factors for the tourism plummet &ndash; but Key has actually done a really shitty job as M of Tourism eh?)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 20:21:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hilary Stace</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223085#post223085</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223085#post223085</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Extraordinary story in the news tonight about Key and his people paying a PR firm $10,000 (of taxpayers' money) to get on the US Letterman show in 2009. They even sent a demo tape. The performance itself was obviously scripted and quite embarrassing. (Incidentally, since then tourism has plummeted).
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 20:13:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223083#post223083</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223083#post223083</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						*Obscenely rich" are the other ones, and I will happily provide the barbecue-
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 20:02:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223082#post223082</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223082#post223082</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I have no idea which Willie Jackson you refer to.</p><p>'Very rich' is anyone who has over $10 million at their immediate disposal.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 20:01:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223076#post223076</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223076#post223076</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>What income and equity level do you set as "Very Rich"?</p><p>As an example would you consider Willie Jackson  very rich and someone not worthy of respect?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 18:58:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223074#post223074</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223074#post223074</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>What income and equity level do you set as "Rich"?.</p><p>Every tax dollar taken and spent unwisely is a dollar denied the humble have nots.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 18:54:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223024#post223024</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=223024#post223024</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The economics problems are – not compounded by the Rich Listers </q></p><p>I beg to differ. What use would it be if the Country gained 10 Billion if that 10 billion just ended up in some "Rich Listers" trust account?<br />Remember, every dollar held by an avaristic  "Have" is a dollar…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 13:07:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=222931#post222931</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=222931#post222931</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>No very rich person is ever worthy of respect- unless they follow Buffet's prescription.<br />Alsmost none anywhere do: in ANZ, you get self-agrandising projects but &ndash; name another Sam Morgan?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 18:48:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=222927#post222927</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=222927#post222927</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The economics problems are &ndash; not compounded by the Rich Listers – the lack of growth and leadership vacuum and other stuff I bang on about here from time to time.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 18:06:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=222914#post222914</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=222914#post222914</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Yet watch wanker Barry Colman try to deny the numbers </q></p><p>Ah yes but. <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10741536 " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> John Keys (sic) says...</a><br /><q>Mr Key has described the list as a "joke" which underestimates the net worth of those included while missing many other seriously wealthy people.</q><br />So, who do we believe?<br />Are there really…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 13:18:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=222905#post222905</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=222905#post222905</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Barry Colman</q></p><p>quoted thus in <a href="http://tvnz.co.nz/business-news/rich-list-gets-poor-rating-opposition-4332131" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">another TVNZ story</a> (text).</p><p><q>But Barry Colman, publisher of the National Business Review and number 45 on the Rich List, denied the wealth gap was widening on TV ONE's Close Up tonight.</p><p>"The gap between rich and poor is one of the most damaging myths…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 11:25:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=222893#post222893</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=222893#post222893</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>This is news only for the week ending Friday July 29, 2011</p><p>The minimum wage needs a lift &ndash; it is the best way to boost an economy that has been mismanaged along the lines of a wait and see approach on the basis that it can't stay bad forever.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 08:25:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=222883#post222883</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=222883#post222883</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Rich listers' wealth up 20% in the last year while the poor languish. Yet watch wanker Barry Colman try to <a href="http://tvnz.co.nz/close-up/beneficiaries-and-rich-listers-7-06-video-4332573" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">deny the numbers</a> in this 7 min CloseUp clip alongside Mangere budget advisor Darryl Evans.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 21:12:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=222840#post222840</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=222840#post222840</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>... and Keating is mentioned in a more reasoned and recent assessment on the Austro-Indonesian relationship.</q><br />While <a href="http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/people/personal/whith_sdsc.php" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hugh White</a>'s a professor these days, his past career as a defense department official under mainly Labor governments tends to colour his views with a certain retrospective justification. Proof that getting it horribly…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 16:25:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=222831#post222831</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=222831#post222831</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It was Keating who defied parody by emerging from his long post-election defeat back then to describe his old friend Suharto as a “constitutionalist” as the kleptocracy imploded.</q><br />...at least Helen Clark boycotted Suharto's funeral!</p><p>and lest we forget the <a href="http://camrhon.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=safe&amp;action=display&amp;thread=6840" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Nugan Hand / Indonesia</a> link here's a chilling timeline (all anonymous…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 15:12:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=222814#post222814</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=222814#post222814</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Fascinating</q><br />People who liked this also liked <a href="http://dailybail.com/home/how-paulson-appointees-former-gs-employees-dan-jester-ed-lid.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this</a> …*</p><p>…oh and <a href="http://dailybail.com/home/jon-stewart-on-the-debt-ceiling-broke-bank-mountain.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">these two clips</a></p><p>*<added> Scary thing is, I think this is how John Key’s <br />mental processes work, too…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:42:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=222805#post222805</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=222805#post222805</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Any criticism by Paul Keating is bound to be driven by personal grudge, with  analysis tacked on by way of justification. It's the way of the tribal ALP , where unflinching loathing and loyalty are as natural as breathing.</p><p>While there's no argument about Geithner's being a disaster, it's more…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:23:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=222789#post222789</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=222789#post222789</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Interesting take on John Key's pal<br />little Timmy Geithner</q></p><p>Fascinating.</p><p><q>Worse, [ex Australian Treasurer and PM] Keating argued, Geithner's misjudgment had done terminal damage to the credibility of the IMF, with seismic geoeconomic consequences: "The IMF is the gun that can't shoot straight. They've been making a mess of things…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 12:38:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=222781#post222781</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=222781#post222781</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>the Buck stops HERE...</strong><br />Interesting <a href="http://dailybail.com/home/dominique-strauss-kahn-tim-geithner-and-the-imf.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheDailyBail+%28The+Daily+Bail%29" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">take</a> on John Key's pal <br />little Timmy Geithner<br />and his time at the IMF<br />(which is fast becoming<br />the Impossible Mission Force)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 12:03:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221891#post221891</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221891#post221891</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What, no Dunnekey…</q><br />That Keynesian Key should go the way of the Dinosaur after what he and his ilk have done to the Global Economy and that Perissodactyla Dunn, that Odd-toed ungulate, should be a little horse and gagging on all that Brontosaurial Bumfluff.<br />I suppose you could use Brontosaurial…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:25:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221862#post221862</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221862#post221862</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>What, no Dunnekey…</strong><br /><q>the difference between an Ass and a Mule </q><br />Woe is the man who mistakes buttocks for slippers…</p><p>Perhaps this morning’s discussion could explore the difference between a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinie" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">heinie</a> and a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinny" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">hinny</a> … ;- )</p><p><strong>Head-onism?</strong><br />Pleasant dreams with the <a href="http://www.mypallow.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pallow©</a><br />better those overstuffed Cabbage Patch Kids©<br />than…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:27:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221843#post221843</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221843#post221843</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Welcome to the Irony Bar...</strong><br />The Mrs 'n' I were only this morning discussing the difference between an Ass and a Mule so I had to check. A Mule is the offspring of a Male Donkey, an Ass, and a female Horse and I wondered about the American term Ass…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:14:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221826#post221826</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221826#post221826</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Mutton dressed as lamb...</strong><br /><q>could have been a cool Chik?.<br />I’ll get my goat.</q><br />those muslims and their <a href="http://www.weschenfelder.co.uk/Muslin_Cloth2FStockinette" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">muslin</a><br /><a href="en.wikipedia.åorg/wiki/Mulesing">Mulesing's</a> just a pain in the ass...<br />&ndash; NSFV (Not Safe For Vegetarians)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:12:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221797#post221797</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221797#post221797</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>by my sainted and stranded grandmother that’s floe…</q></p><p>Your Grandmother was called Floe?  could have been a cool <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chik " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> Chik?</a>.<br />I’ll get my goat.<br />Wooo-oo-ooo, what a little typo can doo-oo-ooo<br />I remember an embarrassing moment with an obituary to a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpDiZLrTHX4 " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> Beloved Aunt</a></p><p>;-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:38:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221793#post221793</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221793#post221793</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>music for old people...</strong><br /><q>Well, there's ..... you</q><br />Aw, shucks Steve, but...<br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcuX0CiXA04&amp;feature=related" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcuX0CiXA04&amp;feature=related</a></p><p><q>Although, today more like an Iceflow</q><br />by my sainted and stranded <br />grandmother that's floe...</p><p>flows have eddies<br />and the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flo_%26_Eddie" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Turtles</a> did, too<br /><em>keep it warm</em>  :- )<br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=am6SVnGYD5M&amp;feature=related" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=am6SVnGYD5M&amp;feature=related</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:58:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221790#post221790</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221790#post221790</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>...how many dudes d'ya know flow like that?</q></p><p>Well, there's ..... you<br />Although, today more like an Iceflow,<br />Don't cha know,<br />Erm ... Bro.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:22:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221780#post221780</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221780#post221780</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>There was never a contract to put tax money aside</q></p><p>That was the earlier arrangement with social security, However there's more than one type of trade off. You may recall a top tax rate of 66% under Muldoon.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:32:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>icehawk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221779#post221779</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221779#post221779</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Damn, sorry about the typos, this ipad keyboard kind sucks for typing in bed.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:53:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>icehawk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221778#post221778</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221778#post221778</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Bart,<br />My apologies fo thinking you were a grumpy old man.<br />But serously, you are totally dead wrong about how National Super was introduced.  It was explicitly NOT the contract you say it was.<br />Labour did set up exactly what you suggest, a tax and invest scheme to tax now…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:52:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221777#post221777</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221777#post221777</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I don't want to dismantle superannuation, but financially your generation did indeed screw over mine.</q></p><p>Icehawk, Bart is younger than you are.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:35:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>icehawk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221776#post221776</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221776#post221776</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Bart, you misrepresent superannuation grossly.  There was never a contract to put tax money aside in the 70s and 80s to fund superannuation later.  Didn't happen.  <br />It was intended as a pay as you go scheme, not a pay now for later scheme.</p><p>But also taxpayers in the 70s, 80s…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:29:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221556#post221556</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221556#post221556</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Nattering Nabobs of Negativity, negated...</strong><br />Our friends across the Tasman also worry about the distribution of money across society...<br />Here's a great take on it from <a href="http://heathenscripture.wordpress.com/2011/07/18/australiar-and-the-fcking-idiot-dilemma/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Geoff Lemon</a>, here's a taster...<br /><q>And the casual punters who might not drop 50 bucks in the pokies anymore might drop it on a…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 13:56:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221538#post221538</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221538#post221538</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I think I could be happy with the former, but it should apply to people under 65 as well.</q></p><p>Wasn't that Social Credit's main idea? It seems like a much simpler idea than welfare, I must say. Effectively it should be tax neutral on the current system, since employed people…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 09:36:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221535#post221535</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221535#post221535</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So somebody who has poor parents, works for years and earns a million dollars will pay tax on that, maybe $330k.</p><p>Someone sensible enough to choose rich parents who leave them a house or farm worth a million dollars pays *no* tax.</q></p><p>That's a bit of a silly comparison. In…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 09:07:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221309#post221309</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221309#post221309</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						From my experience during the 9 years of Labour the union movement and particularly the CTU nutured the working class.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:46:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221280#post221280</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221280#post221280</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>server chewed...</strong><br /><q>grits teeth more in frustration than anger</q><br />Why, you sir, should just be thankful <br />that you are endentured...<br />:- )</p><p><aside> has anyone else noticed that National Radio seems to have been replaced by The Breeze this afternoon? </aside></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:58:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221278#post221278</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221278#post221278</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yes, I can't get past the fact that I paid a shitload more tax in Australia, lived a much richer life, in a country with much more developed infrastructure, and have a big sack of cash waiting for me there, all because of the superior way those Ozzies manage money…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:35:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221274#post221274</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221274#post221274</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Means testing is like user pays. Dumb, dumb, dumb. Guarantee a decent minimum to everybody, including the CEO of Telecom, and incentivise people to supplement that. Getting people to save and then take away what they would have got if they hadn't is just wrong.</q></p><p>I'll disagree.  You are guaranteeing…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:26:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221271#post221271</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221271#post221271</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						You Sir have a tax addiction.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:17:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221270#post221270</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221270#post221270</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Makes sense to me. Inheritance would seem to be the main source of social division, the world over. There will still be upbringing, which is a form of inheritance, but I think public education has done a lot to level that playing field.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:15:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221269#post221269</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221269#post221269</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>For those whom favour estate duty  &ndash; then bring it back an estate Duty at 45% over the value of an estate of $450,000.</p><p>Then In the interest of being fair to everyone it should apply to everything the family home just as it applies to the family farm.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:13:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221262#post221262</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221262#post221262</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>How many libertarians does it take to change a light bulb?</p><p>None. If the light bulb needs to be changed, the market will take care of it.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:51:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221261#post221261</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221261#post221261</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The effect of the $150,000 estate duty wold mean that the farm would be sold to pay the tax and the two farming families would effectively be forced off the land.</q></p><p>They would also get $183,000 to play with, that they could use to buy another farm, or as security…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:48:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221259#post221259</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221259#post221259</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Read the answer fully &ndash; re conversion and other aspects.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:45:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221257#post221257</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221257#post221257</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The answer is again it won’t – there are no outcomes there is no CGT.</q></p><p>FFS, I give up. There are none so blind as those that refuse to see.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:43:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221256#post221256</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221256#post221256</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>How do you chose Rich Parents?</q></p><p>Ask a libertarian</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:42:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221255#post221255</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221255#post221255</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks Simon C &ndash; I checked with my mother this morning and she said it was a Mark TWO...at least I got the 't' right-  :(
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:41:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221251#post221251</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221251#post221251</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>How do you chose Rich Parents?</p><p>Estate Duty was forcing farming families off their land.</p><p>In the situation, at the time Estate Duty was zero rated,  where say there was a farm valued at $600.00 owned by a widow with four children and ( two sons and two daughtes) and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:29:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221246#post221246</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221246#post221246</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The answer is again it won't &ndash; there are no outcomes there is no CGT.</p><p>With the proposal the likely only exemption is the Family home &ndash; so it will apply to assets in a trust or settling assets into a trust.</p><p>The proposal will likely be that when an…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:14:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon C</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221245#post221245</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221245#post221245</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>She quickly sold it for a Mk 10 Zephyr (I think it was a Mk 10) automatic that could truly fly – the 1st vehicle I ever did a ton in-</q></p><p><pendant> </p><p>Cool, a thread I can contribute to &ndash; even if it's only to point out that Zephyrs came in…</pendant></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:13:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221240#post221240</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221240#post221240</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It was an incredibly harsh tax able to be avoided by succesion planning.</p><p>What was happning, on account of inflation, a modest estate of a family home or a farm was being caught by estate duty – hence the zero rating</q></p><p>So somebody who has poor parents, works for years…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:59:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221239#post221239</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221239#post221239</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>You were asking about CGT when you asked:“So, how is the abolition of Gift Tax going to affect all this come October 1st?.”</q></p><p>Why yes, I was. How pedantic of you, let me re-phrase for those that are a little slow on the uptake...<br />So, how is the abolition of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:58:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221236#post221236</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221236#post221236</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It is called Gift Duty.</q><br />Mr. X. <br />It would seem that even your "Bible" is guilty of making this horrendous blunder...<br /><a href="http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/govt-sends-gift-tax-packing-132467 " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> Govt sends gift tax packing</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:46:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221234#post221234</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221234#post221234</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>That is such a classic story &ndash; very old New Zealandy.</p><p>I hope you kept both letters and framed them.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:42:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221233#post221233</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221233#post221233</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>You were asking about CGT when you asked:</p><p>"So, how is the abolition of Gift Tax going to affect all this come October 1st?."</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:38:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221232#post221232</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221232#post221232</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Estate Duty has been zero rated for decades, It used to be 45% of the value of the estate over $450,000.</p><p>It was an incredibly harsh tax able to be avoided by succesion planning.</p><p>What was happning, on account of inflation, a modest estate of a family home or a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:36:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221231#post221231</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221231#post221231</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The CGT isn’t law it won’t be affected – it doesn’t exist and won’t exist at 1 Oct 2011</q><br />And back to you Sir " Sweet Zombie Jesus what are you on about."<br />I haven't seen anything in Labours policy that says Gift Duty will be re-introduced so I think…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:33:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221230#post221230</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221230#post221230</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>a reintroduction of indentured servitude.</q></p><p>Which will, no doubt, be introduced under "URGENCY"</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:29:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221229#post221229</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221229#post221229</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>With regard to CGT &ndash; if it comes in it will operate as it is intended whenever it is passed into law.</p><p>As for toothless hags, nest feathering, and have and have nots &ndash; Sweet Zombie Jesus what are you on about.</p><p>It is called Gift Duty.</p><p>To answer your…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:29:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221226#post221226</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221226#post221226</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Jesus, gift duties AND estate duties abolished? What a great leap backwards. And I say this as someone very likely to benefit from both. I hadn't realized things had got so bad in this country that the idea of unfettered inheritance had made a big comeback. I can't think of…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:13:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221220#post221220</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221220#post221220</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>So, how is the <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/sunday-star-times/business/4942958/A-question-of-trust-over-gift-tax-abolition " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> abolition of Gift Tax</a> going to affect all this come October 1st?. <br /> Does this mean that there will be an increase of “Nest Feathering” and a bloating of family Trusts?. If the top tax rate exceeds the trust tax rate I can see this…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:43:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221210#post221210</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221210#post221210</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>On asking Max Cryer</q></p><p>At the age of about seven or eight, I wrote Max Cryer a letter complaining that he had incorrectly marked a contestant's answer wrong, and that the loss of the unjustly forfeited points had, in fact, cost that contestant the match.</p><p>He wrote back to say…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:49:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221203#post221203</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221203#post221203</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>On asking Max Cryer</p><p>Yeah it comes from Hiram Codd, a British soft drink maker of the 1870s, who promoted drinks in a Codd-neck bottle, the terms codswallop is a derisive term for soft drinks by beer drinkers.</p><p>Wallop is an early slang for beer. </p><p>The initial derivation of he…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 08:45:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221178#post221178</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221178#post221178</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Urm &ndash; DexterX?<br />You do know the meanings of codswallop?<br />Dictionary &amp; local?<br />Dont you?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 00:27:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mattgeeknz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221176#post221176</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221176#post221176</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						__Something I don’t understand: why a capital gains tax on the sale of an investment property incentivises people to invest in the productive sector, when the sale of shares or a successful business would be subject to a capital gains tax also.  Seems like your capital gains are taxed at…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 00:00:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221162#post221162</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221162#post221162</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Deborah Coddington &ndash; shit &ndash; I thought you were she, here in aspirational disguise:</p><p><q>> "It is long past time for people who choose to live in this country stop their servile acceptance of glibly strung-together negatives about New Zealand. Kiwi modesty is fine, but self-flagellation with nihilistic criticism is…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 21:01:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221160#post221160</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221160#post221160</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>...once known in the trade <br />as the Hillman Hump.</q><br />...that's a super snipe!<br />;-  )</p><p><edit> I see Islander has already introduced the car version &ndash; I love those early <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humber_Super_Snipe" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">1938-40 models</a> remind me of an old <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rover_12" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rover 12</a> I used to have, running boards and wind out front windows and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:37:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221159#post221159</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221159#post221159</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What a load of codswallop.</q></p><p>It was actually a serious question, one that was, obviously beneath you superior intellect. Or are you a fan of Deborah Coddington and you meant it as a compliment?<br />Hard to tell really.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:21:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221154#post221154</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221154#post221154</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Hey, you wanna a story about my mother’s brother &amp; *his* Zephyrs?!</p><p>Nah, not going to enhance the stereotype (but they were seriously nice cars.) My late great phantabulous uncle B also had a thing for Chrysler Valiants &ndash; you know when your family trusts you? They lend their NEW cars…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 19:08:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221153#post221153</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221153#post221153</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>She quickly sold it for a Mk 10 Zephyr (I think it was a Mk 10) automatic that could truly fly – the 1st vehicle I ever did a ton in-</q></p><p>LOL. Nice. And I thought the cliches about Maori and their Zephyrs was all bs. I'm not sure when…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 18:36:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221148#post221148</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221148#post221148</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Struth, they were awful wee cars..my mother, who bought it after she sold the Humber Super Snipe, castigated herself for being stupid She wasnt of course – she had been persuaded that the Gimp could get to Oamaru &amp; back on a third of the fuel the Snipe would use.<br />She…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:50:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221146#post221146</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221146#post221146</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> But it’s a little absurd IMO that we are creating all these lovely Kiwisaver self-sufficient retirement savings and then continuing to just pay everyone the same universal pension even if they will have accumulated $1m in their Kiwisaver fund. It’s unnecessary and economically crippling.</q></p><p>Means testing is like user pays.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:39:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221145#post221145</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221145#post221145</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Kiwisaver hasnt been around long enough for my generation (hint: born 1947) to accumlate anything.</q></p><p>Oh I totally agree &ndash; it probably needs at the very least a 20yr run-in &ndash; but I think you need to make the statements now, otherwise we end up in the same argument again…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:29:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221144#post221144</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221144#post221144</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The Hatchback of Notre Dame...</q><br />. . . not to be confused with the trouble-prone and unlamented Hillman Imp, once known in the trade as the Hillman Hump.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:29:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221142#post221142</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221142#post221142</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Kiwisaver hasnt been around long enough for my generation (hint: born 1947) to accumlate anything. Especially if you're self-employed. Neither has my tribe's saving scheme, Whai Rawa, which specifically excluded OAPs.</p><p>Yes, I did read your first sentence BUT it doesnt apply to my generation at all, and the fact…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:19:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221139#post221139</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221139#post221139</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Means-testing of super would have to kick in only after Kiwisaver had been made compulsory for long enough that reasonable nesteggs could be assumed.  But it's a little absurd IMO that we are creating all these lovely Kiwisaver self-sufficient retirement savings and then continuing to just pay everyone the same…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:08:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221136#post221136</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221136#post221136</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>The Hatchback of Notre Dame...</strong><br /><q>My sons names are Morris Oxford <br />and Austin Cambridge.</q><br />Dexter, good sturdy names &ndash; I'd probably lean towards Riley Elf &amp; Wolseley Hornet, myself <br />&ndash; if my genome were to be driving forward in another vehicle...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:02:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221131#post221131</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221131#post221131</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I actually think the antipathy to means testing goes to our stupidly skewed addiction to real estate.</q></p><p>Can I have an antipathy to means testing because I think it's gross?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:46:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221128#post221128</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221128#post221128</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Dig.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:38:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221126#post221126</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221126#post221126</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I tend to agree by supporting the govt investing in the Cullen Fund. and people when they can looking at Kiwisaver &ndash; with a greater allocation of both invested in the NZ economy.</p><p>Compulsion isn't a good thing for most people at various stages of their life &ndash; particularly those…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:35:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Che Tibby</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221120#post221120</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221120#post221120</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Almost all older kiwis own their own homes.</q></p><p>i would want to see numbers on that.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:58:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221107#post221107</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221107#post221107</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Elder abuse is often done by children &ndash; I wouldn’t think "the horrid class" you are imagining would get a look in.</q></p><p>Seen it happening. Yes, the children were not blameless.</p><p><q>You mean by liquid the stuff that evaporates in a downturn or crisis.</q></p><p>No, I do not mean that.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:10:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andre</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221106#post221106</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221106#post221106</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Almost all older kiwis own their own homes. Means testing would cover other assets and investments and therefore would only affect a small percentage and wouldn't "drive people from their homes". Bad investment decisions would be more likely to cause the loss of the family home rather than a lack…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:04:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221102#post221102</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221102#post221102</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Mazda "Bongo Wagon" GSX Field Runner?</q></p><p>FTW.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:49:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221099#post221099</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221099#post221099</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I can hear violins and I am getting very dizzy.</p><p><q>"The horrid class of property investors who prey on them during this period are quite sickening.</q> </p><p>Elder abuse is often done by children &ndash; I wouldn’t think "the horrid class" you are imagining would get a look in.</p><p><q>Either that,…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:35:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221089#post221089</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221089#post221089</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I actually think the antipathy to means testing goes to our stupidly skewed addiction to real estate. The asset-rich-cash-poor phenomenon is widespread. To me, the solution is not to force old people out of their homes, but rather to encourage the investment of a much larger proportion of our wealth…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:07:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221087#post221087</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221087#post221087</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Either that, or tell people they can have Muldoon-level super when they agree to Muldoon-level taxes.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:52:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andre</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221083#post221083</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221083#post221083</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I just think that opposition to means testing comes from a very small portion of society if the reality of the situation is pointed out &ndash; that it will only be the very wealthy who don't get paid superannuation if pensioners are means tested. The amount of negative press given…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:49:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221080#post221080</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221080#post221080</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What next?</q></p><p>If it's a girl, Zanella Aprilia Guzzi Bimota.</p><p>If it's a boy, Ridley Norton Royal Enfield.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:44:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221076#post221076</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221076#post221076</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I agree with this comment of Ben's in every detail. Including the fact that my parents never voted for him either.</p><p>In fact owing to the FPP gerrymander, Muldoon's mandate came from a minority of voters for his entire tenure, and not even from the biggest group of voters for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:32:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221073#post221073</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221073#post221073</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Also, everyone knows a good upright piano is cheaper and sounds better than a baby grand.</q></p><p>But it’s harder to lounge provocatively on …</p><p>oops too much time in Emma’s thread</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:23:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221070#post221070</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221070#post221070</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Mazda "Bongo Wagon" GSX Field Runner?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:20:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221069#post221069</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221069#post221069</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Toyota "Spawny" Getz?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:19:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221066#post221066</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221066#post221066</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>My sons names are Morris Oxford and Austin Cambridge.</q></p><p>What next, Hillman Humber 90 Super Minx?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:13:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221059#post221059</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221059#post221059</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The fact is that the currently retiring generation voted to end paying for superannuation beyond paying tax by installing Muldoon as PM</q></p><p>Funny way to see it. My folks never voted for him. Even if they had, there have been 7 other PMs in NZ since who had various mandates…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:00:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221056#post221056</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221056#post221056</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						My sons names are Morris Oxford and Austin Cambridge.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:50:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221054#post221054</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221054#post221054</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Economic management with a lack of a focus on growth is the problem</q></p><p>Or a lack of focus on <strong>value</strong>. Including the sustainability of returns on investment (in more than just an economic sense too).</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:44:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221052#post221052</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221052#post221052</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the currently retiring generation voted</q></p><p>They still do. And too many of the rest of us don't. But it oversimplifies to take a generational snapshot as the basis of diagnosis. We all need to be part of what comes next.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:40:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221047#post221047</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221047#post221047</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The fact is that the currently retiring generation voted to end paying for superannuation beyond paying tax by installing Muldoon as PM</q></p><p>Speaking for the whole "cohort" and baling them are we?</p><p>NZ super has always been paid out of the general tax take.</p><p>The original "Sovereign Weath Fund" (created…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:19:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221045#post221045</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221045#post221045</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Without wanting to comment directly on these peoples’ circumstance</q></p><p>I wonder whether their daughter is really called Porsche, or that a Herald reporter can't spell Portia? An aspirational name either way.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:13:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Butler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221039#post221039</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221039#post221039</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Yes, they are making quite a strange choice, IMHO. They could sell one of the businesses and keep their kids toys. It sort of points to where their priorities lie.</q></p><p>Indeed. You have to wonder what the marginal benefit of selling the trampoline would be when they are already selling…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:03:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andre</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221038#post221038</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221038#post221038</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The fact is that the currently retiring generation voted to end paying for superannuation beyond paying tax by installing Muldoon as PM. They were of course voting against Reds Under the Beds, for Think Big and for the inalienable right of South Africa to play rugby here as long as…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:59:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221034#post221034</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221034#post221034</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Without wanting to comment directly on these peoples' circumstance it doesn't seem to fit with what I call aspiration or what I apsire for in my life.</q></p><p>Yes, they are making quite a strange choice, IMHO. They could sell one of the businesses and keep their kids toys. It sort…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:46:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221032#post221032</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221032#post221032</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Though I believe there are still presumptions of good faith in both cases.</q></p><p>Well you typically wouldn't agree to a contract if there was no good faith. But the good thing about them is you have protection against bad faith, so it makes good faith all the more likely.</p><p>Not…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:44:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221025#post221025</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221025#post221025</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Without wanting to comment directly on these peoples' circumstance it doesn't seem to fit with what I call aspiration or what I apsire for in my life.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:27:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221022#post221022</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221022#post221022</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>The theory is quite old, but the laws around contracts are older, and it's always been considered foolish to base them on decency and trust alone. An ironclad document, and a court before which disputes can be settled are basic ideas in good contracting. That's why I don't like the…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:21:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221020#post221020</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221020#post221020</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Aspiration and compassion are not mutually exclusive. Thankfully.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:19:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221019#post221019</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221019#post221019</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>You are speaking for yourself as a person with no aspiration?</q></p><p>No, I’m <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/2436604/Everything-must-go-The-TradeMe-family" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">referring to what can happen if things get unstuck</a>, and it's just the tip of the iceberg. People have the right to opt out of this kind of arms race without ridicule, whether they’re Sam Morgan or…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:19:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221018#post221018</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221018#post221018</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>That's because in the time the term was used, agreements were supposed to be based on decency and trust.</q></p><p>I'm not so sure about that. The theory is quite old, but the laws around contracts are older, and it's always been considered foolish to base them on decency and trust…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:18:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221013#post221013</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221013#post221013</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						You are speaking for yourself as a person with no aspiration?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:07:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221009#post221009</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221009#post221009</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						What a load of codswallop.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:04:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221006#post221006</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=221006#post221006</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So, is aspiration a good thing or should we just make the best of what we have and be grateful for life’s little bonuses?.</q></p><p>‘Aspiration’ isn’t such a good thing if it only leads to Mutually Assured Default. It’s just the same as that other MAD, but instead of nukes,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:00:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220992#post220992</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220992#post220992</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I have wondered in the past, and indeed I am wondering now. Is voting an aspirational thing?. Do we vote for people we would like to be like? do we vote for Parties that represent that to which we aspire?<br />If that is true then it explains a lot. If…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:16:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220990#post220990</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220990#post220990</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Hence it is welfare.</q></p><p>So if it was offset against PAYE instead of paid in cash, it wouldn’t be?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:13:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220989#post220989</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220989#post220989</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>This is what English said in the house:</p><p><a href="http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/PB/Business/QOA/b/7/7/49HansQ_20110713_00000002-2-Tax-System-Changes-Fairness.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/PB/Business/QOA/b/7/7/49HansQ_20110713_00000002-2-Tax-System-Changes-Fairness.htm</a></p><p>I don't think he spent all of last week saying it &ndash; he probably did a lot of other things as well.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:10:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220987#post220987</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220987#post220987</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Cunliffe's fairly blazing <a href="http://blog.labour.org.nz/index.php/2011/07/19/lies-damned-lies-and-steven-joyce/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">rebuttal of Joyce's numbers</a>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:05:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220986#post220986</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220986#post220986</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>They voted in all those other governments as well</q></p><p>You're quite right. But pretty much everyone was stunned by the decision(s) to stop superannuation by those other governments. They didn't campaign on that policy and when the public realised what had been done to their future they booted the pricks…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:00:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220981#post220981</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220981#post220981</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What a douche bag…..</q><br />Mr. Maitland sure has quaint turn of phrase, so self descriptive.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 09:47:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220980#post220980</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220980#post220980</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Rob Salmond at Pundit picks up <a href="http://pundit.co.nz/content/tax-burdens-some-facts-for-a-change" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the fisking</a> baton.</p><p><q>Bill English and David Farrar spent last week telling fibs about the tax burden high-income families assume. I want to set the record straight with some details about how much the top 10% really pay</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 09:42:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220979#post220979</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220979#post220979</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the top 10% of income earners pay nothing, nothing, towards benefits or WFF</q></p><p>How do you figure that out?  </p><p>Are you sayng the top 10% of income earners pay no tax?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 09:28:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220978#post220978</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220978#post220978</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Why do people describe WFF as "welfare"? It's a tax credit based in circumstances (number of children to support).</q></p><p>Hence it is welfare. It just happens to disproportionately advantage wage and salary earners.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 09:23:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tim Hannah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220977#post220977</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220977#post220977</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I’m saying this again as is my custom:</p><p>    Presently 10% of the top income earners pay 70% of personal taxes. and if Labour get in this will go up,<br />    We have 90% of all families in NZ paying no income tax when you take into account WFF.</q></p><p>You can say…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 09:22:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220976#post220976</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220976#post220976</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Why do people describe WFF as "welfare"? It's a tax credit based in circumstances (number of children to support). If it was netted against tax rather than paid as a cheque, would it be welfare then?</p><p>Is someone who sells a house (sorry, famileee home) at a $300k profit receiving…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 09:05:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220969#post220969</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220969#post220969</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						That links not relevant to much.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 07:39:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Christopher Nimmo</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220966#post220966</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220966#post220966</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>It is because it is their money . They entered into a contract with their government. They voted pretty explicitly for a government that established and then reestablished superannuation. It is not their fault that some governments in between forgot that and spent the money on other things “it’s OK…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 07:14:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220961#post220961</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220961#post220961</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Nah <em>mate</em>, we're talking nastier earlier Nat governments here. We're talking Muldoonism & all the later pigshit.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 01:46:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220960#post220960</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220960#post220960</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Um &ndash; you're talking about the 84 &amp; 87 Labour Govts</q></p><p>Don't forget Treasury and their fellow LSE-influenced muppets in the late 70s/early 80s.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 01:21:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220959#post220959</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220959#post220959</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Waddaya gonna do? push the oldies off on an iceflow? not heard of Global warming? </q></p><p>And to add, dropping Tabun canisters on Otahuhu, Te Atatu and Cannons Creek? <a href="http://www.rickross.com/reference/hate_groups/hategroups402.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Oh wait...</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 01:15:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220957#post220957</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220957#post220957</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the ascendancy of selfish neolibs rendered useless much of our longstanding business and political frameworks built on that basic assumption of humanity.</q>  </p><p>Um &ndash; you're talking about the 84 &amp; 87 Labour Govts.</p><p>A month back, as I was going about my day, I saw one of these geezers, a former…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 00:19:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220956#post220956</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220956#post220956</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>A wee refresher &ndash; NZ Superannuation &ndash; what is know as National Super &ndash; has always been paid out of the current tax take.</p><p>In late 2001, Labour created the Cullen Fund &ndash; which is actually the NZ superannuation Fund &ndash; which is NZ's sovereign wealth fund &ndash; it was…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 00:04:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220954#post220954</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220954#post220954</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Definitely &ndash; I grew to adulthood with the idea of the contract of social welfare.<br />It was known, talked about, but entirely unwritten. You paid your dues in taxes: you knew that there would be free State education(to end of secondary level), hospital care, and assisted housing, and benefits for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 23:54:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220952#post220952</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220952#post220952</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I've never liked the idea of the social contract metaphor. It's not like a contract at all. There's no court to enforce it. There's no legislative framework it fits into.</q></p><p>That's because in the time the term was used, agreements were supposed to be based on decency and trust. Before…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 23:40:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220943#post220943</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220943#post220943</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>They entered into a contract with their government.</q></p><p>See, I keep sticking on that point. Can you show me a copy of this contract? Can you provide evidence that the parties involved understood and agreed with it? Are there any signatories? Was there offer, acceptance and consideration? Was there some…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:11:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220941#post220941</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220941#post220941</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Also, Sean, I want to come back to your comment on Kiwiblog:</p><p><q>Ok, so I just went and read Keith Ng’s analysis and its freakin’ terrible – a 4th Form economics student could’ve picked it full of holes.</p><p>What a douche bag…..</q></p><p>Now that I've answered your question seriously and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 20:54:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220940#post220940</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220940#post220940</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If you add the size of the workforce, plus beneficiaries including super annuitants you get about 3 million – unless you can’t count?</q></p><p>Keith, did you leave the door open to kiwiblog again?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 20:50:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220930#post220930</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220930#post220930</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>governments in between forgot that and spent the money on other things “it’s OK we’ll pay it back later”.</q><br />And we will. As you say "it is their money" and "We" said we would pay it back and we will, whether "We" like it or not.<br />Waddaya gonna do? push…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 17:48:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220928#post220928</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220928#post220928</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Closing the $7.5b hole in Labour's numbers is easy. Terminate PV Joyce’s Roads of Dubious Significance.<br />Bang, that’s the thick end of $10b saved over the next decade, job done.</q></p><p>This. Are the usual outlets too blinded by images of Route 66 to fisk it? Or does Big Trucking know…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 17:22:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220926#post220926</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220926#post220926</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>when people become unemployed, they get a new job</q></p><p>Yes, clearly. That's why we've had all these people who've lost their jobs but our dole queue is non-existent. Right?<br />No, wait, it's loaded with hundreds-of-thousands of "bludgers" (I'm fairly sure, by your tone, that that's how you view them) who…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 17:07:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220925#post220925</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220925#post220925</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Closing the $7.5b hole in Labour's numbers is easy. Terminate PV Joyce’s Roads of Dubious Significance.<br />Bang, that’s the thick end of $10b saved over the next decade, job done.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:58:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220922#post220922</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220922#post220922</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>because we OWE them</q></p><p>You're missing my point. It isn't because we owe them. Nor is it because we are morally compassionate, although I'm happy to have people help the old for that reason too.</p><p>It is because it is <em>their money</em> . They entered into a contract with <em>their</em>…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:29:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220920#post220920</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220920#post220920</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It’d be nice if industrial policy worked</q></p><p>I'm thinking mainly of ensuring supporting infrastructure &ndash; including research, training, connectivity, business development and global market expertise &ndash; for sustainable high-value industries . I'm not sure that's what you mean by 'industrial policy' is it?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:26:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220919#post220919</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220919#post220919</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> They’ve got large pension funds amassed overseas.</q></p><p>Aha. Now, lets say they've also got large funds located here, something that could easily be legislated for &ndash; say no more than a fixed percentage can be overseas. </p><p>Note that Australia has over 1.28 <em>trillion</em> Australian dollars in such funds. If we…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:21:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220918#post220918</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220918#post220918</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Deborah, you are correct that beneficiary income is net – but Labour have said they will be increasing beneficiary payments by $10 to match the increase in workers net pay after the tax cut takes effect.</p><p>Keith conveniently missed this.</q></p><p>As I said on Kiwiblog (and as Gareth pointed out),…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:16:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220915#post220915</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220915#post220915</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yes &ndash; the best answer to the raft of problems is to concentrate on economic growth (export lead).</p><p>As an example &ndash; Fonterra, their biggest export is still "Milk Powder".  In our "traditional industries" there is a massive room (further potential) for growth through innovation and added value &ndash; finding…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:05:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220914#post220914</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220914#post220914</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Um, Steve Barnes – when people become unemployed, they get a new job – they don’t just give up and spend the rest of their lives on the dole.</q></p><p>Ah, yes, of course they do, they could stack shelves at the supermarket or play professional Rugby with other hunky chaps…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:01:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220909#post220909</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220909#post220909</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Can you elaborate on this fear?</q></p><p>So an imaginary nation, call it Smugland, has a prudent but aging population that saves well for their retirements. They’ve got large pension funds amassed overseas. Then they start wanting to bring the money home and convert it back into Smugs. The inflow of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:49:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220903#post220903</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220903#post220903</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I mean the outlay at the end &ndash; as per Aus, retain a universal super payment but it's mean tested, primarily against the amount you have in that compulsory super account... One of our problems as it currently stands is that KS does nothing about keeping the Govt's super bill…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:26:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220901#post220901</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220901#post220901</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Um, Steve Barnes &ndash; when people become unemployed, they get a new job &ndash; they don't just give up and spend the rest of their lives on the dole. In your world, is everyone a wet blanket?</q></p><p>Tell that to the factoryhands and meatworkers of a generation ago. The same…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:23:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220899#post220899</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220899#post220899</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Has to come with means-testing as well of course...</q></p><p>I'm thinking that it's simply a percentage of income, how it's done in Oz. We can start off low, like they did, and then within ten years everyone will be clamoring to raise it. The money is taken from pre-tax income…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:18:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220897#post220897</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220897#post220897</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>For NZ, the real solution to the demographic problem</q></p><p>is to improve the value produced per worker and business &ndash; improving productivity and strategically supporting smarter industries are two options there. And to stop assuming that people cease creating value at 65 or 67 or whenever.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:16:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220896#post220896</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220896#post220896</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I strongly suspect that any nation that does try to live a rentier existence off its accumulated pension funds will find that inflation and currency changes erode the value of those funds.</q></p><p>It was fairly clear that extended economic stagnation in Japan and Germany came about from high levels of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:16:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Che Tibby</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220895#post220895</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220895#post220895</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						sean, you find that trip-trapping noises make you a little angry?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:15:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220894#post220894</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220894#post220894</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Compulsory super contributions is the solution to our super problem. It won't harm anyone on super, but it can reign in the cost of national super really, really fast.</q></p><p>Has to come with means-testing as well of course...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:15:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220893#post220893</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220893#post220893</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>you conveniently forget that Labour have stated that the $5000 tax free applies to all beneficiaries as well.</q></p><p>WTF?   That number is in Labour's $1.3b cost &ndash; Joyce has invented this huge influx of people from somewhere to suddenly have the cost almost doubling in 10 years. You can argue…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:13:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220890#post220890</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220890#post220890</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The thing which people miss about retirement is that basically, the section of the population that works has to produce the goods and services that the retirees consume.</p><p>Having a big pile of money "saved" by those retirees doesn't actually change that, except insofar that it can buy imported goods.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:03:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220889#post220889</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220889#post220889</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>no, a thousand times no.</q></p><p>Actually, yes. They supported me when I was young, I support them when they are old. To say that they're supporting themselves by having supported me and that I'm supporting myself by supporting them is circuitous and quite pointless, requiring buy in to a contract…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:02:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sean Maitland</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220885#post220885</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220885#post220885</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Wait have we got 3 million beneficiaries now? That would explain why people keep getting so noisily unhappy about them.</q></p><p>If you add the size of the workforce, plus beneficiaries including super annuitants you get about 3 million &ndash; unless you can't count?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:24:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Greg Dawson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220884#post220884</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220884#post220884</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Wait have we got 3 million beneficiaries now? That would explain why people keep getting so noisily unhappy about them.</p><p>And uh, I assumed that Steve was talking about Hayek, not Hitler. Is Hayek a godwin now? I suppose there a large number of mustachioed Austrians to choose from.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:20:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sean Maitland</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220883#post220883</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220883#post220883</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Deborah, you are correct that beneficiary income is net &ndash; but Labour have said they will be increasing beneficiary payments by $10 to match the increase in workers net pay after the tax cut takes effect.</p><p>Keith conveniently missed this.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:20:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Deborah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220879#post220879</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220879#post220879</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						My understanding is that beneficiary income is first worked out net of tax, then it is grossed up to create the weekly income / annual income figure, and then taxed together with any other income they earn.  I had assumed the $5,000 tax free threshold would be taken into account…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:04:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sean Maitland</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220872#post220872</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220872#post220872</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Keith Ng &ndash; you conveniently forget that Labour have stated that the $5000 tax free applies to all beneficiaries as well.</p><p>If you can't even get that one right, I doubt the validity of any of your other arguments also.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:52:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220871#post220871</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220871#post220871</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I will pay for the oldies</q></p><p>no, a thousand times no.</p><p>You will pay for yourself, if you live that long, and while the govt is holding the money for you they will invest it in infrastructure and business in New Zealand. And yes, I remember at least two elections…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:52:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sean Maitland</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220869#post220869</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220869#post220869</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Um, Steve Barnes &ndash; when people become unemployed, they get a new job &ndash; they don't just give up and spend the rest of their lives on the dole.  In your world, is everyone a wet blanket?</p><p>And your argument is so horrendously weak, that you have to resort to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:50:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Che Tibby</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220868#post220868</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220868#post220868</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The rail car fiasco is a good example. Laying off workers because buying rail-cars from China is cheaper in the short term ignores the fact that those workers will become unemployed, therefore increasing their private debt burden at the same time as increasing welfare payments.</q></p><p>it also means that the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:47:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220866#post220866</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220866#post220866</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>That's pretty much everyone in the workforce. So if everyone already gets something, how would more people get it?</q>More people in the workforce under Labour?. Oops ;-)<br />Anyway, as we all know, it is private debt that is the problem, not public debt. So, with Labour creating and retaining more…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:44:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Raymond A Francis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220862#post220862</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220862#post220862</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Good stuff Keith<br />I see David Farrar has commented on your points over "there" I will not re-publish his points but would be interested in your response, if any</p><p>While I can see the justice of taxing capital gains I am not so sure about governments taxing inflation that they…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:39:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220861#post220861</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220861#post220861</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Superannuation was a very simple contract between the voters and the government ... voters paid taxes that the govt would set aside and invest and then pay back to those lucky enough to live past 65 years.</q></p><p>It's a contract I never signed. I will pay for the oldies, but…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:35:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220860#post220860</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220860#post220860</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>one of which the under-65s pay for with their income tax</q></p><p>Because those over 65s have never paid tax in their lives?</p><p>Superannuation was a very simple contract between the voters and the government ... voters paid taxes that the govt would set aside and invest and then pay back…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:29:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220858#post220858</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220858#post220858</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>You could quite easily make Mayfair an undesirable suburb by cutting the power and water.</q></p><p>Or combine 'monopoly' with <a href="http://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/713/nuclear-war" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">'nuclear war'</a>, as I did with some friends once (hey, don't judge me: we were young and going through an experimental phase, 'k?)</p><p>With one roll of a dice, make large…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:19:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220851#post220851</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220851#post220851</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Compulsory super contributions is the solution to our super problem. It won't harm anyone on super, but it can reign in the cost of national super really, really fast.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:52:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mattgeeknz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220844#post220844</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220844#post220844</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						What does anyone over 67 have to lose (at least those without assets or income)?  It’s a narrow band of people that will be affected.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:21:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Che Tibby</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220843#post220843</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220843#post220843</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Superannuation spend is going to 9.5 billion in 2012, and it will continue to grow. </q></p><p>oh THAT elephant in the room.</p><p>national super is the untouchable spend. old people vote en masse.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:18:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mattgeeknz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220841#post220841</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220841#post220841</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I don't understand why we need to sell assets or create new taxes so we can afford to top up the income of wealthy or working over-65s.  That generation has most of the wealth and a capital gains tax is just going to be another way to tax  younger generations…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:15:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220832#post220832</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220832#post220832</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I'm sure this has been pointed out elsewhere, but selling SOEs and repaying government borrowing isn't "paying off debt" in any meaningful sense.</p><p>The net debt stays unchanged, and the return on capital is lost. Only if the SOE makes a lower ROI than the interest on government stock will…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 11:30:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220829#post220829</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220829#post220829</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>That means Labour are about 7.5b off the mark and unlikely to be able to pay off any debt from these tax changes.</q></p><p>There's about $4-5b which are legitimately challenged, where Labour has a case to answer. And yeah, that'll have a massive impact on their ability to pay off…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 11:04:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220828#post220828</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220828#post220828</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Play Monopoly with children, see what happens.</q></p><p>Usually, I thrash them, and prefer not to play them except to teach it. But yes, I seldom bother developing Mayfair unless for some reason the game has got to an advanced state and everyone has a lot of money. That's uncommon -…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 11:02:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220827#post220827</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220827#post220827</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>1) I suspect you need a rather thick skin if you work at Treasury and 2) you don't need to look too hard to find occasions where Treasury numbers should be taken with an unhealthy amount of salt.</q></p><p>What Russell said.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 10:58:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220822#post220822</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220822#post220822</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Play Monopoly with children, see what happens. Mayfair costs a whack to get into game killing shape, utilities just keep on trucking, like the railway stations.<br />The interesting thing round this whole debate, is the debate itself I reckon.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 10:38:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220820#post220820</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220820#post220820</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Hope that made sense, and if anyone has a clear answer I would be very interested in hearing it.</q></p><p>It was, may I say, an excellent question.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 10:28:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220819#post220819</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220819#post220819</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Keith, quick question: Given that National have already pre-borrowed a lot of money at current (cheaper) rates, wouldn't this further off-set Joyce's interest figures in Labour's favour? Eg: if Labour miraculously win the election, there is funding already available and already earning interest (and accounted for in Treasury's books) that…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 10:23:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220818#post220818</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220818#post220818</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Monopoly 101, never sell the utilities.</q></p><p>? I never sold anything unless I was already screwed, but I would often trade a utility with a big cash difference for any other kind of property, or neglect to buy a utility, given the chance, when I was low on cash. The…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 10:16:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220817#post220817</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220817#post220817</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						More needs to be made of scaling back Prostetnic Vogon Joyce's pet projects and the vested interests that lobbied and profit from them. And not just the Holiday Highway either.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 10:12:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220816#post220816</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220816#post220816</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Great post, Keith.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 10:10:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220814#post220814</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220814#post220814</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Monopoly 101, never sell the utilities. Also with smart metering the whole electricity game changes.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 09:45:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220809#post220809</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220809#post220809</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>So if I understand your numbers you are saying that about $15b of Joyce's numbers are bollocks.</p><p>That means Labour are about 7.5b off the mark and unlikely to be able to pay off any debt from these tax changes.</p><p>It is disturbing how variable such important financial predictions are,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 09:30:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220803#post220803</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-easy-as-1-2-228-billion/?p=220803#post220803</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>he's pulling our lego...</strong><br />a close up of <a href="http://walyou.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/cool-lego-calculator.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mr Farrar's calculator?</a><br />Now known in the trade as a <a href="http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/farrago" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">farrago...</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 09:05:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
