<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | OnPoint: Budget 2011: Now with 70% less wordiness!</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214064#post214064</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214064#post214064</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>it’s a bad idea mostly centred around the cost in administration of such a one time levy</q></p><p>Yeah, nah, not buying that one. Yes it'll cost to administer, but it'll still raise a hell of a lot more money than it costs.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 09:48:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214062#post214062</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214062#post214062</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Well exactly, it’s one bit of revenue which they couldn’t get away with turning into a top-end tax cut. I hope.</q></p><p>I suspect their objection is more grounded in the fact that the Greens dared to suggest that such a levy could be rated progressively. And I have to say,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 09:41:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Butler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214060#post214060</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214060#post214060</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q><conspiracy theory> The cynical side of me suspects that’s the real reason the government don’t like such a levy because it only leads to more direct levies/taxes which ultimately take control away from the powerbrokers </conspiracy theory></q></p><p>Well exactly, it's one bit of revenue which they couldn't get away with turning into a top-end…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 09:37:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214059#post214059</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214059#post214059</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>absolute refusal to impose a levy</q></p><p>Yeah I've seen various discussions of why it's a bad idea mostly centred around the cost in administration of such a one time levy.</p><p>But to me the value of it is that it emphasizes the direct nature of how we give our money…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 09:31:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214056#post214056</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214056#post214056</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>heck I’m not certain wtf they did with the money but it’s gone.</q></p><p>Some of it hasn't been spent. It's just sitting there, accumulating servicing costs. English said as much a couple of weeks ago, when he said that some of the borrowing recently has been far in excess of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 09:20:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214045#post214045</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214045#post214045</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>pre-loading debt</q></p><p>Worth noting debt in itself isn't bad. It's just that the use National made of that debt was ... well .. useless. Instead of using the debt to stimulate the economy they ... heck I'm not certain wtf they did with the money but it's gone.</p><p>The Spanish…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 18:00:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214038#post214038</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214038#post214038</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I believe it is still used for bailing out broken banks and financiers.</q></p><p>touche</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 16:55:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bmk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214037#post214037</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214037#post214037</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So long as the other major party in Parliament fails to come up with coherent and recognisably different policies from National’s, it makes perfect sense for people to choose the leader who projects a more competent image</q></p><p>Yes. That's why when they say this I just keep quiet.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 16:52:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214036#post214036</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214036#post214036</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>National have fucked the economy in a craptacular fashion. Economic incompetence on a grand scale.</q><br />Totally agree, and also with your last paragraph.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 16:41:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214035#post214035</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214035#post214035</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>yes, the Tories are right that we need to cut spending</q></p><p>Depends where one cuts the spending. Cutting spending on Roads of Dubious Significance in order to spend money on social policies is objectionable to you? You'd rather than the RODS <em>and</em> the social policies were funded?</p><p>National have fucked…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 16:32:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Greg Dawson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214029#post214029</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214029#post214029</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>We don’t even seem to learn that way.</q></p><p>Well exactly. We've done this before, but it seems to be mostly forgotten what happened. The intervening boom has removed all memory of a time when things were not-so-great.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 14:46:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>81stcolumn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214026#post214026</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214026#post214026</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'm not expecting socialism any time soon</p></blockquote><p>I believe it is still used for bailing out broken banks and financiers.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 14:39:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Butler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214020#post214020</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214020#post214020</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What I find sad is that in NZ we never seem willing to believe that what is found to be true in other countries – we have to learn it for ourselves :(.</q></p><p>We don't even seem to learn that way.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 13:31:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214019#post214019</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214019#post214019</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yup, dogma says, in a recession government spending should increase, decreasing spending causes an even bigger drop in taxes which leaves everone in the poo.</p><p><q>Dublin's policy of ferocious cuts to public services, pay and welfare were the model to be emulated</q></p><p>What I find sad is that in NZ…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 13:27:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214015#post214015</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214015#post214015</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>There are about a thousand discrete steps</q></p><p>Thank goodness for MMP</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 11:06:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian MacKay</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214014#post214014</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214014#post214014</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Indeed it is. But it’s been deliberately misrepresented as public debt – hence the ‘strategic deficit’. Hardly any bullshit has been called on the issue, and I suspect it’s the case because the banks (mostly run from Oz) have too much to lose.</q><br />Andrew R supplied me these figures. Not…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 10:59:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Greg Dawson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214013#post214013</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214013#post214013</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/sep/24/recession-ireland-spain-recovery?intcmp=239" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Interesting article in the guardian</a> on the results of slashing public spending in a recession (recently, as opposed to the all the earlier evidence).</p><p>Currently I'm petrified of a repeat of the early 90s, but I can't see how we're going to dodge that bullet given the performance on both…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 10:53:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214012#post214012</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214012#post214012</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But my question is this: isn't it private debt that NZ ought to be worried about? as I understand it private offshore debt has been the concern of the ratings agencies, and our government debt is not very alarming in an international context.</q></p><p>Indeed it is. But it's been deliberately…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 10:50:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214011#post214011</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214011#post214011</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I'm not expecting socialism any time soon</q></p><p>There are about a thousand discrete steps between "yes, the Tories are right that we need to cut spending, but here are some tax credits for R&amp;D" and "socialism".</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 10:46:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214008#post214008</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214008#post214008</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm not expecting socialism any time soon
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 10:03:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214007#post214007</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214007#post214007</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Our views on what constitutes recognisably different policies appear to be wildly divergent.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 09:57:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214006#post214006</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214006#post214006</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So long as the other major party in Parliament fails to come up with coherent and recognisably different policies from National's</q></p><p>That <a href="http://publicaddress.net/system/topic/3038/?p=214000#post214000" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">seems to be changing</a>, at last &ndash; posted on t'other Budget thread.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 09:54:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ana Simkiss</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214004#post214004</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=214004#post214004</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Private savings are offset by government borrowings, yes I grok that.  What you're saying is that we are robbing Peter to pay...Peter (Peter being the better off who get cuts to their taxes while paying more tax on Kiwisaver).  </p><p>But my question is this: isn't it private debt that NZ…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 09:46:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213998#post213998</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213998#post213998</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>When I talk to the average person about politics they can kind of agree that National haven't enacted good policies but then they usually finish it with '... but John Key seems like a good bloke so I'm going to vote for them again.'</q></p><p>So long as the other major…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 08:28:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Robert Urquhart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213991#post213991</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213991#post213991</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I just let off in my LJ/blog about "Incentive" not being equal to "Opportunity" after something Bill English said in an <a href="http://tvnz.co.nz/q-and-a-news/bill-english-interview-transcript-4183518" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">interview</a> today.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 21:35:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213985#post213985</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213985#post213985</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The $2.6b cut to KiwiSaver subsidies is real. Whatever the growth rate turns out to be, this savings will still exist</q></p><p>"Reduced expenditure" != "savings"</p><p>Go and sit on the naughty step for that one.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 19:36:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213983#post213983</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213983#post213983</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>increasingly a need will grow for Key to be more specific. Can't fudge questions forever</q></p><p>He only wants to fudge them till November 26...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 19:33:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213949#post213949</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213949#post213949</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>When I talk to the average person about politics they can kind of agree that National haven’t enacted good policies but then they usually finish it with ‘… but John Key seems like a good bloke so I’m going to vote for them again.’</q></p><p>I concur. The media is what…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 22:45:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213941#post213941</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213941#post213941</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Well, it’s real in terms of the <em>government’s</em> balance sheet, anyway – which may be too limited a way of looking at it, eh.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 18:24:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213939#post213939</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213939#post213939</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Plu-leaze. This $1.2 billion saving exists only if the budget projections re growth, tax increase etc are accurate. Simply they aren't and it won't.</q></p><p>The $2.6b cut to KiwiSaver subsidies is real. Whatever the growth rate turns out to be, this savings will still exist.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 17:53:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213938#post213938</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213938#post213938</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But...isn't there a good thing we will not get, ie more private savings for retirement, and less private debt? Help me understand Keith</q></p><p>Kinda, but not really. That private savings will be offset by public debt (i.e. Government borrowing money). More importantly, they'll go disproportionately to high-income earners.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 17:50:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213937#post213937</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213937#post213937</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>This $1.2b isn't all it's cracked up to be. It's coming out of money the government was pumping into private KiwiSaver accounts. </q><br />They needed an extra $1.2b in funding (I'd argue they needed more but OK), and got most of it by raising taxes (through reversing tax credits) on private…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 16:33:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213922#post213922</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213922#post213922</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I think most people aren't properly informed</q></p><p>I agree. Informed enough in political terms means both media and opposition doing their jobs so that voters don't need to wade through all the policy detail or gameplaying to form an impression of who/what to vote for.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 14:13:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bmk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213920#post213920</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213920#post213920</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I don't. Probably because I think most people aren't properly informed and aren't that interested in becoming properly informed.<br />When I talk to the average person about politics they can kind of agree that National haven't enacted good policies but then they usually finish it with '... but John Key…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 13:45:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213919#post213919</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213919#post213919</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I have faith in properly-informed people making good decisions.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 13:42:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian MacKay</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213917#post213917</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213917#post213917</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Key/Joyce are laughing at our gullibility Sacha and that's not nice.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 13:27:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213916#post213916</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213916#post213916</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the revenue lost because of top end income earner tax cuts is more than $1.2 billion per year anyway</q></p><p>They pulled the same trick last year of adding a (fudged) projection of growth to claim that their tax package was 'neutral'. Media dolts largely swallowed the kool aid.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 13:23:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew R2</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213914#post213914</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213914#post213914</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Plu-leaze.  This $1.2 billion saving exists only if the budget projections re growth, tax increase etc are accurate.  Simply they aren't and it won't.  </p><p>(And the revenue lost because of top end income earner tax cuts is more than $1.2 billion per year anyway.)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 12:41:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213907#post213907</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213907#post213907</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yep, that was exactly Ana's point (=there is something good that we will NO LONGER get as a result of the budget; hence it is not neutral)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 11:06:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Greville Whittle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213905#post213905</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213905#post213905</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But...isn't there a good thing we will not get, ie more private savings for retirement, and less private debt? Help me understand Keith!</q></p><p>I'm not sure what you mean here. If by private savings you mean Kiwisaver, then no there probably will not be more money going in. </p><p>A number…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 10:53:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian MacKay</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213900#post213900</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213900#post213900</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Anyway there are strong rumours that this Budget was written/masterminded by Steven Joyce, the Rumsfield lurking in the National ranks. They are laughing at the people.  Unwise strategy.<br />It does leave a gap for Labour Greens to enunciate a fresh direction and increasingly a need will grow for Key to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 10:14:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213894#post213894</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213894#post213894</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						too short (minor typos) 'nd'->'and' 'when'->'went'
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 22:24:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ana Simkiss</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213874#post213874</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213874#post213874</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						But...isn't there a good thing we will not get, ie more private savings for retirement, and less private debt? Help me understand Keith!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 20:04:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213809#post213809</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213809#post213809</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Realised that I was kinda droning on yesterday.</q></p><p>Nah. We appreciate it and try to keep up.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 15:30:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213805#post213805</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213805#post213805</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Word. </p><p>Briefly: super untouched, RoNS roll on, military unmolested.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 15:15:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213804#post213804</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2011-now-with-70-less-wordiness/?p=213804#post213804</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 15:15:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
