<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | OnPoint: Budget 2009: “Aww, shit.” (Final Update)</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Caleb D&#039;Anvers</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113411#post113411</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113411#post113411</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Or economists, even.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 11:47:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Caleb D&#039;Anvers</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113410#post113410</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113410#post113410</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But English's most intriguing admission was that he had appointed former Treasury boss Graham Scott &ndash; and a panel of economists &ndash; to work on a new economic strategy.</p></blockquote><p>Econonists. Oh, <em>great</em> . ITE, that's a bit like hearing that the politburo have engaged a crack team of Marxist-Leninist theoreticians…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 11:46:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113382#post113382</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113382#post113382</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I've been looking at that downgrade bogeyman.</p><p>I need to do some more numbercrunching, but it looks like Eurozone states with an AA- rating pay maybe 1% &ndash; 1.5% more on their government debt than AAA states.</p><p>Also, that only actually cuts in when the government rolls over debt or…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 09:49:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andrew llewellyn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113360#post113360</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113360#post113360</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Update 2: Less money for Super Fund = Less money for Super</p></blockquote><p>Gee, that flu pandemic's looking like a better idea than we first gave it credit eh?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 19:28:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113322#post113322</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113322#post113322</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>How can a recession be ferocious?</p></blockquote><p>And, the standard of the poor be so timely?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 19:33:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113303#post113303</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113303#post113303</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Found <a href="http://blogs.nzherald.co.nz/blog/show-me-money/2009/5/31/borrowing-blow-out/?c_id=1502818" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this</a> bit of info also.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 10:58:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113293#post113293</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113293#post113293</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Oh, and <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&amp;objectid=10575140" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">a tidbit</a> from Fran O'Sullivan.</p><blockquote><p>But English's most intriguing admission was that he had appointed former Treasury boss Graham Scott &ndash; and a panel of economists &ndash; to work on a new economic strategy.</p><p>This is either a shocking admission that English doesn't know what to do next, or…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 22:23:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113292#post113292</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113292#post113292</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Budget, you say.  NZ Institute says <a href="http://www.nzinstitute.org/index.php/nzeconomy/mediarelease/as_inadequate_as_a_lone_chopstick/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">not good enough by half</a>.</p><blockquote><p>But like just one chopstick without its mate, avoiding a ratings downgrade was necessary (and welcome) but insufficient.  To fuel New Zealand’s economic growth and make it stronger coming out of the recession than before, the Budget also needed…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 22:18:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ScottY</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113284#post113284</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113284#post113284</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						George, I agree, and I wasn't suggesting all Nats support privatisation and the other things ACT stands for. The Nats are a fairly broad church at present. But many within its ranks probably do like ACT's economic policies. So to characterise NZ as a naturally left-wing country is an over-simplification.…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 17:55:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113280#post113280</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113280#post113280</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Bear in mind though that a large percentage of the Nats probably support many of ACT's policies but stick with the Nats for other reasons</p></blockquote><p>This may be true. But by the same token, a large percentage of National voters were won over from Labour at the last election, and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 17:08:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ScottY</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113269#post113269</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113269#post113269</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I/S, I agree there are many aspects about the system that can be identifed as "of the Left". You mention free education and free healthcare as examples.</p><p>But a large number of people (maybe even the majority) support tax cuts, harsher penalties for crims, freedom from the "nanny state" etc.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 13:22:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113263#post113263</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113263#post113263</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>ACToids and Libs beg to differ, of course. But I think their combined 3.7% of the vote last election shows how popular their narrow view of fairness is.</blockquote> Winston was even more popular than Mr 3 %.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 12:14:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113262#post113262</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113262#post113262</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Again, I'm going to take issue with your analysis. Fairness means different things to different people.</p></blockquote><p>Yes, it does &ndash; and the post you are responding to acknowledges that.  At the same time, the version of fairness subscribed to by the vast majority of people in this country is not…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 12:08:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113260#post113260</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113260#post113260</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks, Scott. That's kind of what I was saying &ndash; fairness to some people can be about the state/society "not interfering" with the individual's own responsibilities which are paramount. </p><p>In that worldview, public intervention may be immoral if it distorts or thwarts that prime motivation. However, only the most loony…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 11:29:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ScottY</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113255#post113255</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113255#post113255</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Sure &ndash; but the concept of fairness broadly (but not exclusively) held in New Zealand is a left-wing one, focused on substance rather than mere process, and favouring the little guy over the Big Corporate.</p></blockquote><p>Again, I'm going to take issue with your analysis. Fairness means different things to different…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 10:33:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon J Taylor</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113253#post113253</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113253#post113253</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"what would in this day and age trigger a sequel to the 1981 Tour?"</p><p>Something totally out of the ordinary as I'm not sure if most of us want to go down that path again.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 09:52:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113241#post113241</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113241#post113241</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Geldof of my cloud...</strong></p><blockquote><p>Oh ain't you glad that we live on an island,</p></blockquote><p>me an' Janet Frame<br />and I don't like Mondays neither... :-)</p><p>yrs<br />Cobol Byte-Byte<br /><em>Character Support</em></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 22:21:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>81stcolumn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113238#post113238</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113238#post113238</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>@Ian Dalziel</p><p>__''Oh ain't you glad that we live on an island,<br />You can choose your own way of being killed,<br />You can jump off a cliff and get drowned in the sea,<br />Or be dashed 'gainst the rocks and get split,<br />And it could happen to you (no it…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 21:26:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113236#post113236</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113236#post113236</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Surely fairness is not a concept exclusive to any political perspective &ndash; they just disagree about what is fair and what is not.</p></blockquote><p>Sure &ndash; but the concept of fairness broadly (but not exclusively) held in New Zealand is a left-wing one, focused on substance rather than mere process, and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 21:16:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113235#post113235</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113235#post113235</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The dominance by National governments post-war is not merely a symptom of the FPP electoral system. It also possibly reflects other features of the Kiwi psyche, such as conservatism, a dislike of interfering governments, and a distrust of outsiders.</p></blockquote><p>Sure, but a) FPP is a very important part of that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 21:13:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ScottY</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113234#post113234</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113234#post113234</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>One matter that seems to have escaped notice (until now) is the cut to legal aid spending in the budget.</p><p>Legal aid has been chronically underfunded for years. Funding was increased in the last budget, but has been cut back again in this budget. This means hourly rates for legal…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 21:07:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113233#post113233</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113233#post113233</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I/S graphs the effect on the Super fund.</p></blockquote><p>No no no.  The Labour Research Unit graphs the effect on the Super fund; I steal it.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 20:56:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113228#post113228</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113228#post113228</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>We are the new Number One!</strong></p><blockquote><p>Make NZ a prison island.</p></blockquote><p>Only if we get those nifty menacing big white balloons for offshore security, though...</p><p>yrs<br />John Drake<br /><em>No. 6</em></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 18:46:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113225#post113225</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113225#post113225</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Make NZ a prison island.</p></blockquote><p>Then we could tell Obama there is room for <em> all </em> Gitmo detainees , for a price.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 18:34:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113224#post113224</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113224#post113224</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Make NZ a prison island.</p></blockquote><p>John Carpenter's <em>Escape From Otara</em>  &ndash; coming to cinemas soon!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 18:20:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Dinah Dunavan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113223#post113223</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113223#post113223</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>WANTED: gib fixers, roading contractors, and prison wardens.</p></blockquote><p>oh oh oh. I just worked out a way for NZ to make money. Sell our prison services overseas. Make NZ a prison island. That way we can all work for International Correction Inc. Building new prisons, keeping the prisoners in line.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 18:05:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113222#post113222</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113222#post113222</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>By the way, in all this, the one argument that is offensive is that Cullen spent all our money so there is nothing left...</p><p>The money "spent" means that our national debt is incredibly low, in fact, Don Brash argued vehemently it was too low not so long ago. It…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 18:02:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113221#post113221</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113221#post113221</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>economic xenophobia</p></blockquote><p>Craig, it's cos they're <em>bankers</em> , not foreigners.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 17:27:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113220#post113220</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113220#post113220</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Even when they promise tax cuts a well educated 12 year old could identify as completely unviable.</p></blockquote><p>So are you diagnosing an epidemic of underage voting last year?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 17:24:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113218#post113218</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113218#post113218</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Surely fairness is not a concept exclusive to any political perspective &ndash; they just disagree about what is fair and what is not.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 17:22:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113217#post113217</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113217#post113217</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I simply don't believe we can make any reliable statement about where on the political spectrum NZers sit as a group. Other than somewhere between John Minto and Garth George.</p></blockquote><p>I/S &amp; ScottY: the 8 Tribes is a reminder of the unwritten class divide.</p><p>Speaking of Minto, what would in this…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 17:20:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113216#post113216</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113216#post113216</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I/S <a href="http://norightturn.blogspot.com/2009/05/killing-superannuation.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">graphs</a> the effect on the Super fund.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 17:19:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Littlewood*</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113215#post113215</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113215#post113215</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>where on the political spectrum NZers sit as a group</p></blockquote><p>That's if they're on the spectrum at all. Most of them (us) find politics a total snore because it consists mainly of two parties slugging out the lamest argument ever. "More government!" "Less government!" "More spending" "Less spending"</p><p>That is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 17:16:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113213#post113213</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113213#post113213</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong><em>One Step Beyond</em>  the bucket...</strong></p><blockquote><p>THIS is beyond the pail</p></blockquote><p>sorry to tie up loose threads <br />but <a href="http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/64100.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">THIS</a> is beyond the <strong>pale</strong>  : )</p><p>and that's intertwinement</p><p>yrs<br />P. Alice Aide<br /><em>Stakeholder in <br />the Pedant Patrol</em></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 17:06:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ScottY</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113212#post113212</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113212#post113212</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>New Zealand is a naturally left-wing country. Our fundamental values &ndash; fairness and egaliatrianism &ndash; are values of the left. Our default policy setting since the 1890's has been to see government as a solution, rather than the problem to be ovecome. That may be born of pragmatism &ndash; we…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 17:00:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sam F</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113210#post113210</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113210#post113210</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>"Jam tomorrow"</p></blockquote><p>Just as well. Despite what we were told, this sandwich doesn't taste like Nutella to me.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:53:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tim Michie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113209#post113209</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113209#post113209</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks for the reassurance Scott.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:51:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ScottY</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113208#post113208</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113208#post113208</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>On the R&amp;D thing, I'm no fan of this government, but it's simply not true to state there was nothing in the budget for R&amp;D.</p><p>1. CRIs are probably quite pleased with the 20% increase in funding to the CRI Capability Fund </p><p>2. The Marsden Fund received its biggest ever funding…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:47:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113207#post113207</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113207#post113207</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>a fiscal chastity belt &ndash; successive governments just have to fight the temptation to hunt for the key.</p></blockquote><p>Nice metaphor &ndash; but wasn't that what boomer superannuation pre-funding was meant to be, given the efforts that supposedly went into negotiating a durable cross-party consensus?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:46:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113206#post113206</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113206#post113206</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks for fleshing out the special ed funding implications, Hilary and Giovanni.  I imagine my initial optimism may be similarly confounded in other Votes by the sneaky slashing that has gone on.</p><blockquote><p>When the people who are in charge of delivering the funding consistently underspend their budget, and see it…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:46:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113204#post113204</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113204#post113204</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hasta la victoria, eventually.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:33:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113202#post113202</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113202#post113202</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>What's eventualism?</p></blockquote><p>I have no idea. You better ask Labour.</p><p>Every time I ask their MPs and activists when they're going to get around to (insert reasonable idea here) they tell me they can't do everything at once, and they'd like to do it eventually some time in the distant…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:31:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113201#post113201</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113201#post113201</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>What's eventualism?</p></blockquote><p>"Jam tomorrow"</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:28:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113200#post113200</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113200#post113200</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>MMP means No More NeoLiberalism.</p></blockquote><p>Shit acronym then.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:26:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113199#post113199</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113199#post113199</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Kyle: yes, but... one of the reasons the pendulum could swing so widely under FPP was the disconnection of politicians from those they represented.  No-one (well, no-one other than Bob Jones and Roger Douglas) voted for NeoLiberalism, but because we had an unfair electoral system, it happened anyway.</p><p>New Zealand…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:23:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Littlewood*</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113195#post113195</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113195#post113195</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>pragmatic eventualism</p></blockquote><p>What's eventualism?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:16:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Littlewood*</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113192#post113192</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113192#post113192</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>They've cut a lot of things, but one thing they're spending large on is roads.</p><p>$10.7 billion of roading projects.</p></blockquote><p>Gag. Splutter. Puke.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:08:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113191#post113191</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113191#post113191</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It's also testament to how Labour's pragmatic eventualism (re)established gradual change as the accepted model.</p></blockquote><p>And redefined the political centre.  Working For Families, Kiwisaver, and anti-privatisation are now political facts National has to accept (or change only very, very gradually).</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:05:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113183#post113183</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113183#post113183</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>We have MMP to thank for this, I think. under FPP, an election like 2008 would have produced an enormous majority, with all the arrogance that entails. But by ensuring the distribution of seats in the House reflects the actual votes cast, MMP has ensured that parties are acutely aware…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:34:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tim Michie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113182#post113182</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113182#post113182</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>If it's okay to borrow for long term infrastructure investments why isn't okay to borrow for research and development?</p><p>I looked long at hard at National election criticism of Labour for not increasing New Zealand productivity versus their lack of any policies to change that.  I guess neutering the RMA…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:29:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113180#post113180</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113180#post113180</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>That there are very few things in the budget that can be labelled 'radical' is testament to the political environment.</p></blockquote><p>Yeah, but that same environment is also a hurdle for disruptive changes like change the tax base towards non-productive activities and consumption...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:13:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113179#post113179</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113179#post113179</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Forecasts past the next Parliamentary term are pointless anyway &ndash; basically all we've had is National telling S&amp;P "honest man, we'll spend HEAPS less if we're around in 10 years". It's borderline nonsense.</p></blockquote><p>Heh, I spent half of last night arguing that point. It's about drawing a set of targets which…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:09:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Caleb D&#039;Anvers</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113178#post113178</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113178#post113178</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Pfffft, egg heads. Who needs them to develop an economy?</p></blockquote><p>Exactly. Looking at National's budget priorities, I can't help seeing a big employment ad: WANTED: gib fixers, roading contractors, and prison wardens. It's not a terribly inspiring prospect, is it? Then again, considering the rest of National's stated bugbears --…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:08:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>tussock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113173#post113173</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113173#post113173</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Only work a 40 hour week to get that income, own their own home on it, leave the keys in the car, sell all our butter to rich countries at inflated prices, go to some pointless war alongside the yanks for a trifling economic deal, ... oh well, we've still…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:54:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113171#post113171</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113171#post113171</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>NoRightTurn has published something similar to what I've been thinking today.</p><blockquote><p>We have MMP to thank for this, I think. under FPP, an election like 2008 would have produced an enormous majority, with all the arrogance that entails. But by ensuring the distribution of seats in the House reflects the…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:49:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113141#post113141</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113141#post113141</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I know the Herald thinks we are all idiots but <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10575236 " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> THIS</a> is beyond the pail. Its the electronic equivalent of writing in crayon.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 13:34:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113128#post113128</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113128#post113128</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Those of us who are working toward the academic life, on the other hand, might not have much of a choice.</p></blockquote><p>I know that academics are already up and leaving. I'm not sure this will slow things.</p><p>They always have, of course, for bigger, better, and different things. But New…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:37:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113125#post113125</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113125#post113125</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Pfffft, egg heads.  Who needs them to develop an economy?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:33:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jake Pollock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113123#post113123</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113123#post113123</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'm not going overseas, and there are much bigger factors IMO than Govt policy in THAT decision</p></blockquote><p>Those of us who are working toward the academic life, on the other hand, <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10575193" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">might not have much of a choice.</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:27:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113122#post113122</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113122#post113122</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I know this sounds hyperbolic (is that a word?)</p></blockquote><p>It's more than just a word. It's a super-mega-fantastic word.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:25:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113121#post113121</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113121#post113121</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I know this sounds hyperbolic (is that a word?) and I don't mean it to as I'm certainly not considering actioning it...</p><p>but it's this sort of approach that is more inclined to "force me offshore" than anything the previous Govt were doing.  A complete lack of investment in growth…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:24:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tony Parker</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113119#post113119</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113119#post113119</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Some interesting 'savings' in the Education Budget, such as in several areas of early childhood education including not reducing teacher/child ratios as previously planned, also cuts to 'gifted and talented', support for students at risk and deaf education. Large cuts to the Ministry of Ed's budget for supporting teachers, especially…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:14:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113116#post113116</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113116#post113116</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>nor am I suggesting completely ignoring R'nD was a great idea</p></blockquote><p>I have to say, this Budget exceeds my worst fears for its total lack of commitment to anything knowledge related. Slashed funding for academics' salaries. Abolished R&amp;D credits. Replacing the Fast Forward Fund with some nonsense food industry funding that's…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:05:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113112#post113112</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113112#post113112</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Setting aside the superannuation debacle, I think the strangest thing we have in this budget is how it seriously goes against what pretty much every other developed-world economy is doing to get itself out of the recession. That is, having a half-decent stimulus package for more than just the rich,…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 11:52:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hilary Stace</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113107#post113107</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113107#post113107</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Some interesting <a href="http://www.minedu.govt.nz/theMinistry/Budget/Budget2009/EducationSavings.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">'savings'</a> in the Education Budget, such as in several areas of early childhood education including not reducing teacher/child ratios as previously planned, also cuts to  'gifted and talented', support for students at risk and deaf education. Large cuts to the Ministry of Ed's budget for supporting teachers, especially…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 11:20:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113100#post113100</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113100#post113100</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Yes. But it can't go up forever, right? So the fact that it's coming down is not necessarily catastrophic.</p></blockquote><p>Agreed, it just has to be clearly articulated at such &ndash; we are going to have less money each year to spend on services.  TBH I'm not too against that (spending…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 10:26:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113095#post113095</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113095#post113095</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It would save a lot of time if you just linked to the Labour Party talking points, or at least properly attributed.</p></blockquote><p>If you could point out anything factually incorrect in what I wrote I'd be grateful.</p><p>otherwise STFU</p><p>k</p><p>thnx.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 10:06:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joshua Arbury</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113094#post113094</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113094#post113094</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Setting aside the superannuation debacle, I think the strangest thing we have in this budget is how it seriously goes against what pretty much every other developed-world economy is doing to get itself out of the recession. That is, having a half-decent stimulus package for more than just the rich,…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 10:00:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nathaniel Wilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113093#post113093</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113093#post113093</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Knowledge-economy-jobs are only good if we've got someone to export ideas/technology etc.. too, and who's buying at the moment?  I'm not meaning to suggest we should all be rushing for our shovels, nor am I suggesting completely ignoring R'nD was a great idea, but still.  </p><p>It pains me to say…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 09:48:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113092#post113092</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113092#post113092</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Tom:</p><p>It would save a lot of time if you just linked to the Labour Party talking points, or at least properly attributed.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 09:40:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hilary Stace</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113091#post113091</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113091#post113091</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>For example, the boost in ORRS funding for disabled students is welcome after years of the Labs dragging the chain, but I notice what seems to be a large cut in funding for equipment and housing modifications (unless the responsiblity has been quietly transferred to DHBs).</p></blockquote><p>Re ORRS. Not quite…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 09:39:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113090#post113090</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113090#post113090</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Having a listen to the radio and reading the paper, it seems to me the main political battleground to come out of this budget is the gutting of the Cullen Fund. Eleven years?  Bill English won't be the finance minister in three years let alone eleven.</p><p>National has a perfect…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 09:38:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113087#post113087</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113087#post113087</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Meanwhile, I was kind of hoping the economic xenophobia had left the building with Winston Raymond Peters and his personality cult.</p><p>Stupid <em>stupid</em> me.  I really hope Michael Cullen is somewhere quitetly cringing at the "Bill English sucked dirty foreign banker dick" crowd. </p><p>Still, Telecom did pick a hell to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 09:25:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113086#post113086</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113086#post113086</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>PPPs are just an expensive way for the government to pretend its not borrowing.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2009/05/26/the-real-expenses-scandal/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Monbiot on PPP's in the UK</a>.</p><p>No, sir. I'm agin 'em.</p><p>And just out of interest, I note that the tax legislation is being repealed 'under urgency'.</p><p>Is there <em>any</em>  legislation passed under this government that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 09:15:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113085#post113085</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113085#post113085</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>For example, the boost in ORRS funding for disabled students is welcome after years of the Labs dragging the chain</p></blockquote><p>It had been boosted by more money in the last Cullen budget, no? But sitll no result from the Special Needs Resourcing Review, and what is needed there is a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 09:06:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113084#post113084</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113084#post113084</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm holding them responsible for failing to address employment rather than for the dire global situation. I know it's complex but it seems a quite deliberate choice to focus on keeping happy the same cabal of international financiers who got the world into its current pickle. Instructive comparing what Cunliffe…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 09:02:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113083#post113083</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113083#post113083</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Having said that, one thing that people will feel is the Nat's use of fiscal drag to effectively raise taxes for the foreseeable future. Full points for irony!</p></blockquote><p>Except that for a while anyway &ndash; perhaps beyond this term &ndash; it will be lowering average taxes as wages drop...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 08:16:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113081#post113081</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113081#post113081</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yeah, but that's just a consequence of the economic environment rather than any policy impacts.</p><p>Having said that, one thing that people will feel is the Nat's use of fiscal drag to effectively raise taxes for the foreseeable future. Full points for irony!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:27:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113080#post113080</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113080#post113080</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It's going to be painfully obvious at every subsequent budget</p></blockquote><p>Especially with expert fisking like this  &ndash; thanks, Keith. Don't know if you've also seen The Standard's simple <a href="http://www.thestandard.org.nz/mission-accomplished-2/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">graph</a> of average hourly wage rates based on the Budget projections. Voters just might notice that trend in their wallets.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:18:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113078#post113078</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113078#post113078</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						George, re: CGT etc, I'm right there with you in thinking that a fundamental rethink of why and how we tax is desirable. I love the idea of consumption tax as well &ndash; someone who earns $10m in productive work is a boon to society, even before he pays a…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:09:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113077#post113077</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113077#post113077</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Fascinating and very useful analysis Keith. I should have listened to what you were saying more closely in the lockup.</p></blockquote><p>Heh, nah &ndash; you were sitting right next to me, which meant that you heard my argument while it was still in its Rainman-phase. "Narrrh! Narrrh! 88 billion over 14…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 23:57:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113076#post113076</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113076#post113076</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Standard &amp; Poors delivered their verdict at about 4 p.m. What time did Bill English sit down? Fast readers, eh?</p></blockquote><p>Nah. Everyone at the lock up had a copy since 10am. That's quite a bit of nerd-time.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 23:40:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113075#post113075</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113075#post113075</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>This will mean the 90's sinking cap all over again, the deferral of maintenance, the underfunding of public services for a decade. But doing it this way means they don't have to announcethey're doing it.</p></blockquote><p>I agree that it's basically a sinking cap, but I think it's going to be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 23:38:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113073#post113073</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113073#post113073</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>On this basis the government should just borrow a trillion dollars, invest it, and keep the one billion profit that it makes after a year.</p></blockquote><p>You get diminishing returns on investment (i.e. Your first billion would be invested in the best places, but by the thousandth billion, there'd only be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 23:32:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113072#post113072</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113072#post113072</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Long on bean counting, short on vision and driven by the Treasury. I don't know why people bother voting for National, all they do is elect a bunch of pin stripes from the Terrace.</p></blockquote><p>Hey, don't fall into the trap of dismissing experts when you disagree with them. Otherwise, all…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 23:27:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113071#post113071</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113071#post113071</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Debt is bad. Not worse-than-Hitler bad, but it's not a trivial issue that only matters for high-flying/falling financiers.</p></blockquote><p>When I looked at the first graph, I thought "wow, good thing we're starting from a base of close to zero".</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 23:25:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113070#post113070</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113070#post113070</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Spending growth will in fact be negative in real terms (and going backwards as a percentage of GDP). So someone in fact got more than their "cap spending at inflation" demand.</p></blockquote><p>Yes. But it can't go up forever, right? So the fact that it's coming down is not necessarily catastrophic.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 23:22:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113069#post113069</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113069#post113069</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>firstly, that graph assumes no growth forever, right? If we can actually recover from this recession, then we'd expect debt to fall.</p></blockquote><p>No, it doesn't assume that, but if growth was better than expected, then yes, the debt position will become better.</p><blockquote><p>secondly, 60% debt/GDP would only put us where…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 23:20:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113068#post113068</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113068#post113068</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Shouldn't it be $88 billion plus the interest accruing on that debt? So there may be even bigger spending cuts ahead?</p></blockquote><p>Nope. It's $88b of savings, rather than debt, so it goes the other way.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 23:16:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113063#post113063</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113063#post113063</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Same applies to PPPs. Govt can borrow at a lower rate than business. If it makes sense for business to borrow and invest in public infrastructure, why not for government?</p></blockquote><p>Because voters might look at only the debt side of the balance sheet, without seeing the productive asset that debt…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 22:51:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alastair Thompson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113059#post113059</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113059#post113059</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>All the real work is done by the reduced operating allowance. It’s impact will be felt more and more as time goes on. Each and every subsequent Budget will have to make do with an increasingly inadequate pool. And at the end of it, there’ll be a big-ass shortfall in…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 21:52:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BlairMacca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113058#post113058</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113058#post113058</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I do agree that capital gains should be taxed, however, with the current government I could see them saying "well we can decrease our income tax now, lets increase GST too".  The downside to that being, that if we had a capital gains tax now and income tax was lower,…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 21:52:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Logan  O&#039;Callahan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113057#post113057</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113057#post113057</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Only now do National recognise the wisdom of paying down the govt debt. Far cry from 2005-2007 when they trumpeted the OBERAC surpluses as a sign of government greed.</p><p>Am I reading the budget financial statements right? National budget for a $1billion increase in spending on Govt personnel compared with…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 21:48:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ScottY</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113055#post113055</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113055#post113055</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Ooops, didn't notice.</p><p>I feel all dirty now.</p></blockquote><p>Thank God. I thought you'd become one of Them.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 21:43:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113053#post113053</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113053#post113053</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The press release you linked to is from the Libertarianz.</p></blockquote><p>Ooops, didn't notice.</p><p>I feel all dirty now.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 21:31:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113051#post113051</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113051#post113051</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>All the real work is done by the reduced operating allowance. It's impact will be felt more and more as time goes on.</p></blockquote><p>/me climbs onto hobby horse</p><p>Which is why, as a country we have to ween ourselves off an unnecessary addiction to Microsoft products. $100s millions being siphoned…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 21:21:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113050#post113050</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113050#post113050</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Come on George &ndash; don't you remember the near hysterical pitch the calls for tax cuts got to just last year?</p></blockquote><p>I wasn't in the country last year. I can only imagine that it was horrible to experience.</p><blockquote><p>Politics is about the possible you know.</p></blockquote><p>Well we will never know…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 21:15:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Blake Monkley</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113049#post113049</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113049#post113049</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Tom you are right, could you imagine how much of an uber hole we would be in if Don Brash et al had got in in 2005?</p></blockquote><p>The Treasury 2005, started to think  huge operating surpluses. Labour and National adopted this thinking going into the election 2005, one promising big…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 21:13:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113047#post113047</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113047#post113047</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Come on George &ndash; don't you remember the near hysterical pitch the calls for tax cuts got to just last year? Any attempt to apply a CGT would only have a mountain of invective for "yet another tax when six pack joe Kiwi's want a tax cut."</p><p>Politics is about…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:56:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113046#post113046</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113046#post113046</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>He did try, but even the mention of it got shouted down by all in sundry.</p></blockquote><p>He did not try.</p><p>In 2005 he described a capital gains tax on non-family homes as a "potty" idea. He was strongly opposed, and shot it down every time the Greens discussed it with…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:51:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ScottY</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113045#post113045</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113045#post113045</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Given no tax sweeties, and Garret's wanting to stop them packin' heat, we may see cleavage before the next election. (phnaar, phnaar)</p></blockquote><p>The press release you linked to is from the Libertarianz. It's possibly not the most authoritative source for what ACT and Garrett are doing.</p><p>But you're right about…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:49:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113044#post113044</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113044#post113044</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>the fiscal hawk in me is quite satisfied with the depth of cuts in this Budget</p></blockquote><p>I don't buy that fiscal stringency is all about government cashflow. I think it's more about not stoking bubbles and baling us out of recessions.</p><p>Right now, we're in a *deep* recession. Inflation isn't…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:34:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113042#post113042</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113042#post113042</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Last I looked, DPF was being the good soldier, and his crazier correspondents were declaring war.</p></blockquote><p>Some erstwhile Actoids on my Facebook are incandescent. Given no tax sweeties, and <a href="http://www.voxy.co.nz/politics/act-mp-turns-supporters/5/14369" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Garret's wanting to stop them packin' heat</a>, we may see cleavage before the next election. (phnaar, phnaar)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:21:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Logan  O&#039;Callahan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113041#post113041</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113041#post113041</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The counter argument to not borrowing to invest, is that borrowing to invest is the key driver of the private sector. Leverage is entirely where it's at &mdash; ask Graeme Hart or any property investor. Judgement is a thorny thing though.</p></blockquote><p>Well put.</p><p>Same applies to PPPs. Govt can borrow…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:19:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113040#post113040</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113040#post113040</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>He did try, but even the mention of it got shouted down by all in sundry.</p></blockquote><p>My inner Machiavellian thinks that the solution would be to actively encourage subprime lenders to set up shop here, then sit back and watch McMansionville collapse under its own weight.</p><p>Seriously though, removing tax…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:15:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113038#post113038</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113038#post113038</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Agreeing with both your paragraphs there, Gio.</p></blockquote><p>And you know how much I love giving credit to Tories, right? My teeth were gritted so hard I've since had to be booked in for maxillo-facial surgery.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:06:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Green</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113037#post113037</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113037#post113037</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The counter argument to not borrowing to invest, is that borrowing to invest is the key driver of the private sector. Leverage is entirely where it's at &mdash; ask Graeme Hart or any property investor. Judgement is a thorny thing though.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 19:58:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BlairMacca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113036#post113036</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113036#post113036</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>After nine years of consistently refusing to implement any kind of capital gains tax. Which would have damped house prices, meaning more money spent in other areas, and encouraged money to flow into the productive sectors of the economy.</p></blockquote><p>He did try, but even the mention of it got shouted…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 19:32:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113034#post113034</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113034#post113034</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I hope everyone pauses and has a little grateful prayer of thanks to Michael Cullen, whose refusal to feed the bubble with tax cuts is the only thing between us and Iceland.</p></blockquote><p>I won't.</p><p>After nine years of consistently refusing to implement any kind of capital gains tax. Which would…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 19:17:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113032#post113032</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113032#post113032</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I hope everyone pauses and has a little grateful prayer of thanks to Michael Cullen, whose refusal to feed the bubble with tax cuts is the only thing between us and Iceland.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 18:53:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113030#post113030</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113030#post113030</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Agreeing with both your paragraphs there, Gio.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 18:43:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113028#post113028</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113028#post113028</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>simon g: English sat down with S&amp;P just the other day, I imagine they already got the details straight from the horse's mouth, and they just delayed the announcement until he had delivered it to the nation.</p><p>All in all, am I allowed to say that I feared worse from this…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 18:35:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>simon g</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113027#post113027</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113027#post113027</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Standard &amp; Poors delivered their verdict at about 4 p.m. What time did Bill English sit down? Fast readers, eh?</p><p>Many years ago (pre-internet) I had a temp job as a lowly messenger/clerk in a London financial company, and found that it's the people at the bottom who get to know…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 17:49:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113026#post113026</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113026#post113026</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><I>All the real work is done by the reduced operating allowance. It's impact will be felt more and more as time goes on.</I></p><p>Yup.  particularly in health and education, which combined need an extra $1.25 billion a year just to stay level.</p><p>This will mean the 90's sinking cap all…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 17:40:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113025#post113025</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113025#post113025</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Back when I was a kid, we lived in uninsulated houses, ran up huge deficits, spent big on 'essential' infrastructure projects, and made promises about superannuation that locked in future Governments for decades to come.</p></blockquote><p>And it never hurt me.</p><p>Oh, hang on ...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 17:30:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113024#post113024</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113024#post113024</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10575044" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Just in:</a></p><blockquote><p>International credit rating agency Standard and Poor's has given a favourable verdict on the budget, upgrading New Zealand's outlook from negative to stable.</p></blockquote><p>In both political and economic terms, that's a result.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 17:29:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113023#post113023</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113023#post113023</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>You mean we would be able to get French (8.8%) or British (7.1%) or American (8.9%) levels of unemployment, as opposed to our current 5%.</p></blockquote><p>Paradoxically, the bolshie nature of French trade unions has led to high productivity through machines replacing humans. Here in NZ, companies are still content to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 17:28:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113020#post113020</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113020#post113020</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Harden up.</p></blockquote><p>Yeah. </p><p>Back when I was a kid, we lived in uninsulated houses, ran up huge deficits, spent big on 'essential' infrastructure projects, and made promises about superannuation that locked in future Governments for decades to come.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 17:16:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jake Pollock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113019#post113019</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113019#post113019</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It puts most of the newspaper commentators to shame.</p></blockquote><p>No mean feat, seeing as, as far as I can tell, they have no shame.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 17:11:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113018#post113018</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113018#post113018</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>So, how are DPF, C.Slater, etc spinning this ? Are they wetting their pants with excitement ?</p></blockquote><p>Last I looked, DPF was being the good soldier, and his crazier correspondents were declaring war.</p><p>Excellent analysis, btw, Keith. It puts most of the newspaper commentators to shame.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 17:08:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Blake Monkley</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113017#post113017</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113017#post113017</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>You mean we would be able to get French (8.8%) or British (7.1%) or American (8.9%) levels of unemployment, as opposed to our current 5%.</p></blockquote><p>It's only a matter of time according to Bill English    <a href="http://www.treasury.govt.nz/budget/2009/execsumm/b09-execsumm.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">treasury executive</a> summary (page 13). The next twelve months look really bad. Let's hope the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 17:01:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Grant McDougall</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113016#post113016</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113016#post113016</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Oops, I mean <em>Herald</em> ''s
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 16:57:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Grant McDougall</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113014#post113014</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113014#post113014</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>So, how are DPF, C.Slater, etc spinning this ? Are they wetting their pants with excitement ?</p><p>I had a look at the <em>Herald</em>'s "Your Views" response to the fudge-it and it was a mixture of "what a meanie" and "a strong response to years of wasteful spending by Labour",…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 16:55:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113013#post113013</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113013#post113013</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Those over 65 increased by 2.5% in New Zealand last year, according to Stats NZ. That scale of increase is going to continue for a while.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 16:49:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113010#post113010</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113010#post113010</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Remember when it comes to Super that right now our super cost is 3.5% of GDP and would rise to 5.6% within 20 years.  The point is that by spending at total (including Cullen Fund contribution) of, say 4.5% now we bring down that 5.6% later on. </p><p>It's less about…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 16:26:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Angus Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113009#post113009</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113009#post113009</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The answer of course, is that for most people in NZ, it wouldn't really matter if we had 50% or 60% debt/GDP. We'd have to pay a bit more tax and slightly higher interest rates, but that would be more than outweighed by stable and secure jobs.</p></blockquote><p>You mean we…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 16:11:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113007#post113007</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113007#post113007</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Rod Oram suggested that the long-term returns on the NZSF will be actually be greater than the cost of borrowing – i.e. that borrowing to invest in the NZSF *is* profitable.</p></blockquote><p>On this basis the government should just borrow a trillion dollars, invest it, and keep the one billion profit…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 16:03:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113004#post113004</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113004#post113004</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>aiming to be just like Iceland or Ireland isn't so smart either.</p></blockquote><p>How about Germany, France or Switzerland then? They all have ratios in the over 40% range, and are doing better than we are.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:57:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ben McNicoll</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113002#post113002</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113002#post113002</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I hope the media see through the "delay/defer" spin on tax cuts.</p></blockquote><p>Yep, these were the "fully costed and funded" tax cuts that absolutely could and would happen. </p><p>In the words of a Tui billboard....</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:51:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nathaniel Wilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113000#post113000</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=113000#post113000</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"- secondly, 60% debt/GDP would only put us where most developed nations are now. Why should we be the only ones with tiny government debt, how does it help us?"</p><p>Maybe I've completely missed the point, but I thought the lesson of the worldwide recession was having massive amounts of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:47:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=112998#post112998</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=112998#post112998</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>They've cut a lot of things, but one thing they're spending large on is roads.</p><p>$10.7 billion of roading projects.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:45:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>simon g</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=112997#post112997</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=112997#post112997</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I hope the media see through the "delay/defer" spin on tax cuts. </p><p>I have delayed producing my great novel, but ... you know, it's all there, it just may have to be written posthumously.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:39:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=112995#post112995</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=112995#post112995</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>A typical Tory budget. </p><p>Long on bean counting, short on vision and driven by the Treasury. I don't know why people bother voting for National, all they do is elect a bunch of pin stripes from the Terrace.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:32:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=112993#post112993</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=112993#post112993</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						We all knew there would be nothing for R&D but there should have been. R&D would lead to more jobs, more productive jobs that is as opposed to the non productive 600 extra cops and more probation officers  to control the disenfranchised unemployed.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:28:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Litterick</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=112992#post112992</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=112992#post112992</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Vernon Small on <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/2452570/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stuff</a>: "But the big surprises are in the extent of delays to tax cuts and future contributions to the Cullen superannuation fund."</p><p>Even I could have predicted those two. Equally surprising are more cops on the street and more prison beds. Laura Norder is the winner on…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:15:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=112991#post112991</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=112991#post112991</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Rich, I believe GDP growth IS factored into that debt curve &ndash; but not until 2011. <br />We are forecast to go even further backwards next year</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:13:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=112990#post112990</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=112990#post112990</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>So, how has National managed to reduce future debt? By cutting a fuckload of future government spending.</p></blockquote><p>Spending growth will in fact be negative in real terms (and going backwards as a percentage of GDP).  So someone in fact got more than their "cap spending at inflation" demand.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:09:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=112989#post112989</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=112989#post112989</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Two things:<br />&ndash; firstly, that graph assumes no growth forever, right? If we can actually recover from this recession, then we'd expect debt to fall.</p><p>&ndash; secondly, 60% debt/GDP would only put us where most developed nations are now. Why should we be the only ones with tiny government debt,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:00:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Juha Saarinen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=112986#post112986</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=112986#post112986</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Shouldn't it be $88 billion plus the interest accruing on that debt? So there may be even bigger spending cuts ahead?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 14:53:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=112985#post112985</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-budget-2009-aww-shit-final-update/?p=112985#post112985</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 14:53:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
