<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | OnPoint: Boarding the funeral barge</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>sagenz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38470#post38470</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38470#post38470</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Go Graeme has explained that the EFA and the overspending validation combine to allow sitting MP's &amp; the government to use taxpayer money to spend more than non incumbent candidates.</p><p>Labour can spend $20m advertising their policies and Tim Shadbolt will go to jail if he spends $121,000 without forming a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 20:10:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38358#post38358</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38358#post38358</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>For the record, and to give you the "on the other hand" you so clearly need in every statement</p></blockquote><p>Well, as far as I'm concerned there really isn't much of 'on the other hand' here &ndash; either its out of line for everyone, and people of good will are willing…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:29:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38324#post38324</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38324#post38324</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Good lord Craig, where does "the left" come into my comment? I pointed out the Don Brash said he regretted making a personal attack on Helen Clark and yet here is a group he supports going way beyond the pale.</p><p>For the record, and to give you the "on the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:03:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Angus Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38309#post38309</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38309#post38309</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Ah, Angus, so are you saying that the regulation of third parties is okay, as long as the caps are higher?</p></blockquote><p>Yes, as long as the regulation is not more onerous upon third parties than upon political parties regulation is welcome.  Every stream of political opinion should have the right…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:30:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38297#post38297</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38297#post38297</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Arguably, a pledge card (which can certainly be funded by Parliamentary Services) from a party in Parliament falls within the exemption (so isn't included in the $2.4m cap &ndash; effectively making the limit much higher for parties in Parliament), but a pledge card from a Party outside Parliament trying to…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:56:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38296#post38296</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38296#post38296</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And after that, I'm going to <a href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/12/some_billboards_to_enjoy.html#comment-385294" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">take my own advice</a>, and</p><blockquote><p>...shut the fuck up, go sit on a beach for a while with a good book and plenty of sunblock, and avoid excessive consumption of caffeine or sugar until around mid-February.</p></blockquote><p>Have a splendid holiday season, folks.  I'm planning…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:05:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38295#post38295</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38295#post38295</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It aint such a bad thing to put up billboards comparing our elected political party leaders to various dictators and mass murderers, but oh my paws and whiskers, people gossip about sex. Please.</p></blockquote><p>Alex:  I'm really trying hard not to lose my shit in a seriously unseasonal, Grinch-like manner so…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 23:53:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alex Coleman</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38290#post38290</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38290#post38290</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But running an equally hysterical front page equating Brash to Pauline Hansen &ndash; you know the nice lady who opined it was a mistake ever letting the Abbos vote &ndash; wasn't ever so slightly offensive?</p></blockquote><p>So IWI/KIWI implies what? Is it completley mad to draw the inference that Maori are…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:05:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>A S</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38289#post38289</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38289#post38289</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks for that, Graeme. It's great to have so many people who have waded through the detail, and who can explain it so succinctly. </p><p>When you put it as simply as you have, it does look a bit like the system will now probably provide a greater advantage for sitting…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 21:47:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38286#post38286</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38286#post38286</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>can someone explain whether the new act impose restrictions on members of the public (both financial and in terms of freedom of speech) that MPs and political parties aren't bound by?</p></blockquote><p>There is an exemption in the EFA for publications published by MPs in their capacities as MPs, which means…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:25:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>A S</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38284#post38284</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38284#post38284</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						As someone who has struggled mightily to understand the rather labyrinthine provisions of the new EFA, (actually, I gave up some time ago) can someone explain whether the new act impose restrictions on members of the public (both financial and in terms of freedom of speech) that MPs and political…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:32:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38282#post38282</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38282#post38282</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The leaders' fund. i.e. If an act by a third party is deemed to be electioneering, is it then also something that cannot be funded out of the leaders' fund? And vice versa.</p></blockquote><p>A very vexed question.</p><p>Basically, the answer is no. A pledge card expounding on Labour's policy's for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:48:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38278#post38278</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38278#post38278</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Ah, Angus, so are you saying that the regulation of third parties is okay, as long as the caps are higher?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:43:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Angus Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38275#post38275</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38275#post38275</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>So, you're saying that non-political parties should be able to voice their opinions with as much money as they want, because that's what democracy is all about, but if you put them on a ballot paper, then they're a waste of space?</p></blockquote><p>Yes, I am saying that whilst I agree…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:29:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael Savidge</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38274#post38274</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38274#post38274</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>Preview is my friend, just not one one I visit often enough.</em></p><p>Indeed...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:27:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38272#post38272</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38272#post38272</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Just to nit-pick myself, I'm sure Andrew Little would be quite surprised to learn he's connected with a non-existent trade union called the EMPU.  He's the national secretary of the Amalgamated Engineering Printing &amp; Manufacturing Union (EPMU).</p><p>Preview is my friend, just not one one I visit often enough.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:16:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38271#post38271</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38271#post38271</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>electioneering for what purpose? Whether Parliamentary leader's fund money can be spent on it, or whether it has to be included in the spending cap?</p></blockquote><p>The leaders' fund. i.e. If an act by a third party is deemed to be electioneering, is it then also something that cannot be funded…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:10:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38270#post38270</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38270#post38270</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Didn't Don Brash accuse the Greens of treachery for representing NZ poorly to people overseas? Isn't this the same?</p></blockquote><p>No, Don &ndash; then again, I'm one of those cranks who thinks 'treachery' is another T-word (like 'terrorism') that shouldn't be thrown around carelessly if you want to be taken at…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:08:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38269#post38269</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38269#post38269</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Good idea Keith.</p><p>Every New Zealander will have one last reminder on how to most appropriately thank Labour for their EFA come November, as we stand in line 10x as long waiting patiently to fill in a ballot with a 100 new "parties". The recounts looking at spoiled ballots, the…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:03:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38268#post38268</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38268#post38268</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>What I have read about the US suggests that regulating "electioneering" is a form of whack-a-mole, in which everyone goes about influencing elections through issue advertising and 527's.</p></blockquote><p>Yup, McCain-Fiengold sure didn't turn out to be to the magic bullet its more optimistic proponents were selling it as.  I sure…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:55:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38267#post38267</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38267#post38267</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>are the standards for judging what constitutes electioneering the same for parliamentary material and third party material?</p></blockquote><p>electioneering for what purpose? Whether Parliamentary leader's fund money can be spent on it, or whether it has to be included in the spending cap?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:36:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38266#post38266</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38266#post38266</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Boscawen et al have to do a bit more than start a political party to access the higher limit: they also need to run candidates and/or contest the party list. Not that that's a Bad Thing at all.</p></blockquote><p>Contesting the party list isn't that hard, is it? I mean, *winning*…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:29:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38265#post38265</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38265#post38265</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The Libz should be careful &ndash; they can only publish pro-party or anti-party election advertisement. Parties aren't be permitted to campaign against candidates under the EFA.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:25:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38263#post38263</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38263#post38263</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I wonder if it's legal to take a commission. People like the <em>New</em> Zealand Family Rights Protection Party [the 'new' should also be underlined] could start a cottage industry.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:12:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38262#post38262</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38262#post38262</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Another, less surversive, angle on Keith's point</p><p><a href="http://pc.blogspot.com/2007/12/darnton-offers-party-as-flag-of.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Not PC: Darnton offers Libz political party as 'flag of convenience' for free speech</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:08:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38260#post38260</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38260#post38260</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yes. As personal attacks go I think that has got to be one of the worst I have seen in NZ. Even beats Don Brash's "no respect for the institution of marriage" letter.</p><p>He said he regretted that, I wonder if he regrets supporting these?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:42:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38257#post38257</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38257#post38257</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Well, DPF and his friends have jumped the shark.</p><p>I don't think they grasp what nutters they've made themselves look.</p></blockquote><p>Good. Lord. <br />The only times I've ever ventured into Kiwiblog comments has been off links here, but I still cannot begin to fathom that these people are even mildly serious...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:27:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38255#post38255</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38255#post38255</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>From the DPF link:</p><blockquote><p>The  Helen Clark billboard is was put up today near Auckland Airport</p></blockquote><p>That would be Auckland *International* Airport.</p><p>Didn't Don Brash accuse the Greens of treachery for representing NZ poorly to people overseas? Isn't this the same?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:10:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38254#post38254</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38254#post38254</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Well, DPF and his friends have <a href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/12/some_billboards_to_enjoy.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">jumped the shark</a>.</p><p>I don't think they grasp what nutters they've made themselves look.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:01:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38253#post38253</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38253#post38253</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>So, those saying "we'll just form a party" will need to go beyond that, and actually run candidates. otherwise, non-contsting parties are treated as third parties.</p></blockquote><p>What happens if a party registers itself, etc. early in the year and then fails to get it's act together to actually field any…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:00:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38252#post38252</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38252#post38252</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>anjum: that's what I think. The views of these people are portrayed as being "mainstream", "apolitical" and (worst of all) "common sense".</p><p>This is largely self-perpetuating, too. The publishers of the Herald don't instruct it to be right-wing (to judge from their other papers like the London Independent). What I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:56:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Julie Fairey</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38250#post38250</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38250#post38250</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Well if we want to talk a little about hidden agendas and National's policies Ben then maybe we could look at Tony Ryall's blurt about removing the cap on doctor's fees (not in the policy release) and the absence of any mention of the Iraq war from the foreign policy…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:46:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ben Thomas</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38249#post38249</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38249#post38249</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>if it means people like you won't be able to phone-spam with your expensive astroturf campaigns</p></blockquote><p>Russell, "Astroturf" specifically refers (as the name suggests) to "fake grass-roots" &ndash; rich backers covertly setting up and funding supposedly community based lobbies. Boscawen has been totally up front about his ties to Act,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:31:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38243#post38243</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38243#post38243</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And I'd say this is another debate that would have been better served without the evangelical self-righteousness of large parts of the left.</p></blockquote><p>ha ha ha ROTFLMFAO.</p><p>"Attack on democracy"<br />"End of Freedom of Speech"</p><p>Damn those self righteous lefties.</p><p>Here is a <a href="http://kotare.typepad.com/thestrategist/2007/12/popular-welling.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">little reminder</a> about stupidity the sort of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:01:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>anjum rahman</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38242#post38242</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38242#post38242</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>I didn't point out that my observation is that it isn't just his generation who are perturbed, it's in fact a demographic who have largely dominated political speech in our country &ndash; older well-off white men whose views could generally be classed as "conservative." (Of course there are exceptions to…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:00:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38240#post38240</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38240#post38240</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And for the record, the only way the EMPU is going to influence my vote is if Andrew Little agrees to role-play Mellors to my Constance Chatterly. Which would constitue a corrupt practice, just not in the sense intended by the Electoral Act</p></blockquote><p>That slash is getting everywhere these days.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:52:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38239#post38239</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38239#post38239</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I must admit that I'm confused by the "electioneering" vs "issue advertising" distinction &ndash; controls on the former strike me as utterly uncontroversial but I'm less confident about controls on the latter.  </p><p>What I have read about the US suggests that regulating "electioneering" is a form of whack-a-mole, in which…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:49:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Julie Fairey</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38238#post38238</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38238#post38238</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I had one of those "Yeah so?" conversations yesterday about the EFA.  The person I was gently arguing with* kept putting up arguments against the EFA which had <br />a) been addressed in the amendments or <br />b) weren't different from the situation under the old law from what I understood or…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:46:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38234#post38234</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38234#post38234</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Really, I'd rather see (for the sake of argument) the EMPU running that kind of campaign with their own resources explicitly, rather than the too cute for words semantic two-step the unions trot out every election cycle.</p></blockquote><p>I'm not sure I know that dance &ndash; I'm sure I'd recognise it…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:41:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38230#post38230</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38230#post38230</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And for the record, the only way the EMPU is going to influence my vote is if Andrew Little agrees to role-play Mellors to my Constance Chatterly. Which would constitue a corrupt practice, just not in the sense intended by the Electoral Act.</p></blockquote><p>Tell me you're never, ever leaving us,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:17:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>FletcherB</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38228#post38228</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38228#post38228</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Can I also point out.....  just as Keith and Russell have mentioned  it 's Boscawen's championing thats pushed them over the edge.......   that is in fact an argument that such legislation might not be needed...</p><p>Provided there is proper and adequate identification of the parties doing the spending.... does there…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:08:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38223#post38223</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38223#post38223</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>And I am more than happy with that. If you want to run a huge million dollar campaign arguing for a 63% tax rate on business and outlining all the lovely reasons why it's such a great idea then you can. If you slap "oh and vote Labour coz they…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:45:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jan Farr (Old)</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38221#post38221</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38221#post38221</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I am at a complete loss to understand what all the fuss is about.  $120,000 is quite a lot of money &ndash; in my humble opinion &ndash; and if I had it I certainly wouldn't waste it on political advertising.  But if I wanted to waste it I think that,…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:29:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38215#post38215</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38215#post38215</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Otherwise you'll have National spending their 2 million dollars, and the "Coalition of people who say exactly the same things as National but never actually say 'Vote National', but who use the same branding and images of party leaders etc" spending their 20 million. Or whatever. You might as well…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:16:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38212#post38212</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38212#post38212</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>And I am more than happy with that. If you want to run a huge million dollar campaign arguing for a 63% tax rate on business and outlining all the lovely reasons why it's such a great idea then you can. If you slap "oh and vote Labour coz they…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:04:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Angus Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38208#post38208</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38208#post38208</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Good idea Keith.</p><p>Every New Zealander will have one last reminder on how to most appropriately thank Labour for their EFA come November, as we stand in line 10x as long waiting patiently to fill in a ballot with a 100  new "parties".   The recounts looking at spoiled ballots, the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:32:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38207#post38207</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38207#post38207</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I hate to say it, as I see the loophole, but that <em>to me</em> is an issue ad. All proponents of the bill have stated their intent to place no limit on freedom of speech &ndash; to state your position on a issue, even if it aligns directly with (and…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:31:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38206#post38206</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38206#post38206</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>I like to think we'll see a future election environment where all sorts of interest groups run huge campaigns stating their arguments &ndash; and political parties and their associates then run campaigns outlining their views on those issues. When their views line up with an issues-based campaign that you agreed…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:21:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38204#post38204</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38204#post38204</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p><em>and encouraging people to vote for candidates who feel the same</em></p><p>With that, it is an election advertisement.</p></blockquote><p>And I am more than happy with that.  If you want to run a huge million dollar campaign arguing for a 63% tax rate on business and outlining all the lovely reasons…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:09:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38197#post38197</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38197#post38197</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Craig, I just though I'd say I'm appreciating your various efforts to render then internet sensible.</p></blockquote><p>Aye, I second that. No worries, Craig.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:22:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38193#post38193</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38193#post38193</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Craig, I just though I'd say I'm appreciating your various efforts to render then internet sensible.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:06:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38182#post38182</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38182#post38182</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And, Keith, on reflection I'd like to withdraw and apologise for my use of the s-word.</p><p>To avoid sounding like Trevor Mallard, it was not only an unwise choice of words but unfair, untrue and failed to display the basic civility of debate I expect to be shown by others.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:28:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38181#post38181</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38181#post38181</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Boscawen had the same pivotal effect with me too. I was uneasy, but then I thought, if it means people like you won't be able to phone-spam with your expensive astroturf campaigns, then maybe that's a good thing ...</p></blockquote><p>Russell: There are times of day when I'd like to see…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:12:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38178#post38178</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38178#post38178</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Obviously :-)</p><p>But given you went to the trouble of quoting a <em>section</em> of the <em>Act</em> rather than a <em>clause</em> in the <em>Bill</em>, I thought I'd have some fun.</p><p>And it hasn't appeared on legislation.govt.nz yet, because it's not yet a law. Not for a couple of days yet. I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 01:59:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38177#post38177</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38177#post38177</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Graeme: I'm working off the 3R draft of the divided bill on the Parliamentary website, the law not having appeared yet on legislation.govt.nz.  Section 84 (1) of that reads:</p><blockquote><p>Where a party is listed in the part of the ballot paper that relates to the party vote, the party's election…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 01:44:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38176#post38176</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38176#post38176</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It's not "electioneering".</p></blockquote><p>I/S &ndash; I think you missed this bit:</p><blockquote><p>and encouraging people to vote for candidates who feel the same</p></blockquote><p>With that, it is an election advertisement.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 01:10:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38175#post38175</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38175#post38175</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Boscawen et al have to do a bit more than start a political party to access the higher limit: they also need to run candidates and/or contest the party list. Not that that's a Bad Thing at all.</p><p>See s84(1) of the Electoral Finance Act.</p></blockquote><p>I/S &ndash; that would be:…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 01:06:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38174#post38174</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38174#post38174</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And I'd say this is another debate that would have been better served without the evangelical self-righteousness of large parts of the left.</p></blockquote><p>I may be self-righteous (who isn't, when it comes to democracy?), but at least I can read a statute properly.</p><p>The blunt fact is that this law…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:44:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38172#post38172</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38172#post38172</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Really, this debate would have been a lot easier without the constant FUD from the right.</p></blockquote><p>And I'd say this is another debate that would have been better served without the evangelical self-righteousness of large parts of the left.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:31:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38171#post38171</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38171#post38171</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Take that, plutocrats!</p></blockquote><p>Pluto isn't even a real planet, fascist!  Golly, you are right &ndash; this is fun.  Come on hit me again! "Tool of the military-industrial complex" is a particular turn on.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:18:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38170#post38170</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38170#post38170</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>I don't see why the hell people like DPF and I can blog our fingers into stumps in favour of (say) amending the Marriage Act to give same-sex couples full equality before the law, and encouraging people to vote for candidates who feel the same... but if went out and…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:12:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38169#post38169</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38169#post38169</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And when they want to spend $120,000-$1m on an election, they just have to register as a political party, so that they undergo the same degree of scrutiny as all the other political parties.</p></blockquote><p>How about we split the difference and regulate them to exactly the same extent as incumbent…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:12:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38168#post38168</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38168#post38168</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Boscawen et al have to do a bit more than start a political party to access the higher limit: they also need to run candidates and/or contest the party list.  Not that that's a Bad Thing at all.</p><p>(See s84(1) of the Electoral Finance Act.  Cthulhu, I love saying that.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:04:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38167#post38167</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38167#post38167</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Well, National has member who are dramatically opposed on a lot of social issues, too.</p></blockquote><p>Sure, and I don't see why the hell people like DPF and I can blog our fingers into stumps in favour of (say) amending the Marriage Act to give same-sex couples full equality before the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:59:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38166#post38166</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38166#post38166</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Actually, Craig, the thing that pisses me off the most about Hide's comments was that it was a deliberate rhetorical trick.  </p><p>He never said that the abolitionist or the suffragette campaigns would have been defeated or even hampered by the EFA, so if you took his words at face value,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:33:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38165#post38165</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38165#post38165</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Graeme said:</p><blockquote><p>So you think it does that?</p><p>:-)</p></blockquote><p>Quit teasing and post, damnit! 8-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:18:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38163#post38163</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38163#post38163</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I have got a great idea for every post i make! I'll create a straw man argument, demolish it, then use that to show how easy it is to delude myself that my bitter cynicism is cleverness.</p></blockquote><p>Craig, I think he's talking about me. 8-) But thanks for taking that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:17:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38162#post38162</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38162#post38162</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Addressing the broader point, Craig, what <em>were</em> the abolitionists? Sure, in the present context, slavery and universal suffrage aren't political issues, but that's just because we have near-universal consensus on on them. Back in their day, these were political campaigns.</p><p>And that's all I'm saying &ndash; SST, FF, Brethrens, etc.,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:16:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38161#post38161</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38161#post38161</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I think saying they should have fucked off and formed a political party is a pretty coarse and frankly stupid conception of what being an engaged citizen is.</p></blockquote><p>Note, Keith said 'third party', not 'political party'. You've tangled up his later comments on 'you could just form a political party'…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:47:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38160#post38160</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38160#post38160</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I mostly agree &ndash; and know that money in politics is bad, corrosive even &ndash; to put in a rather righty frame: politics is all about a market place of ideas &ndash; letting one group be able to afford to push their ideas over people who can't seems to me…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:44:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38158#post38158</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38158#post38158</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>if it means people like you won't be able to phone-spam with your expensive astroturf campaigns, then maybe that's a good thing ...</p></blockquote><p>So you think it does that?</p><p>:-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:39:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38157#post38157</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38157#post38157</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Boscawen had the same pivotal effect with me too. I was uneasy, but then I thought, if it means people like you won't be able to phone-spam with your expensive astroturf campaigns, then maybe that's a good thing ...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:31:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Greg Dawson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38156#post38156</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38156#post38156</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>without wanting to sound like a troll, and while being sorely undereducated &ndash;</p><p>isn't the main difference between the abolitionist era and the current that we allow dissenting political parties a voice? or at the least, that it's much more difficult to dispose of dissenters without great risk to ourselves(germanys…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:20:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38151#post38151</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38151#post38151</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I've got an idea, Tom: Get in the spirit of the season and be an elf not a troll.  I directly responded to something Keith wrote, and he (or anyone else who wants to put up a counter-argument) can reply or not.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:30:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38145#post38145</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38145#post38145</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I have got a great idea for every post i make! I'll create a straw man argument, demolish it, then use that to show how easy it is to delude myself that my bitter cynicism is cleverness.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:57:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38143#post38143</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38143#post38143</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>These kinds of rhetorical reacharounds are grossly offensive.</p></blockquote><p>Really, Keith?  The great abolitionist movements in the United Kingdom and the United States contained all kinds of people whose common cause was regarding human slavery as an unspeakable evil despite their political views often being dramatically opposed on every other point.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:46:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38142#post38142</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-boarding-the-funeral-barge/?p=38142#post38142</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:46:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
