<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | OnPoint: Back! (And on the Crusading Herald)</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=35154#post35154</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=35154#post35154</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>A note for other Tokyo-resident NZers:<br />this weekend (Nov 17-18) there will be a NZ trade fair at the Roppongi Hills Arena. Free entry, free music. Refreshments NOT free, however. Further details at  <a href="http://www.nzembassy.com/home.cfm?c=17" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the NZ embassy webpage</a> under the "New Zealand Paradise Week" heading. </p><p>I guess I'm going, out of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:29:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Angus Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34430#post34430</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34430#post34430</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>No, it just doesn't make them tougher than they currently are,</p></blockquote><p>Double negatives are hard to interpret.  Please clarify.  Are you agreeing or disagreeing with the statement?</p><blockquote><p>Again, no it doesn't. It limits them;</p></blockquote><p>Limits them to $60,000 with which to counter spending in the $millions.</p><blockquote><p>organisations spend a lot…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:18:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34351#post34351</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34351#post34351</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>the EFB does not impose donation disclosure on political parties.</p></blockquote><p>No, it just doesn't make them tougher than they currently are, or fix the holes you could drive a truck through; and the spending limits bit still applies.</p><blockquote><p>The EFB bans any arguments countering those of known liars</p></blockquote><p>Again, no…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:07:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Angus Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34319#post34319</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34319#post34319</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Graeme,</p><p>The debate is about the EFB.</p><blockquote><p>The argument in favour of the regulation of third party electoral speech is basically two-fold:</p><p>1. If we impose spending limits and <strong>donation disclosure</strong> on political parties, then we shouldn't allow people to subvert those rules by spending as a third party.</p></blockquote><p>That…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:30:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34307#post34307</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34307#post34307</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>Readers ... have also been almost unanimously in support of a front page editorial today </em></p><p>could more accurately have said:</p><p><em>amongst a tiny minority (less that 0.1% of the electorate) of the especially opinionated, support was almost uninanimous for our editorial.</em></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:08:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>stephen walker</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34217#post34217</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34217#post34217</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Have to say I pretty much agree with Keith (haha, for a change ;-)</p><p>But Graeme's contribution is also much appreciated. Which makes it even more annoying that the Herald seem to be making it out as a villains versus good guys b-movie.</p><p>the Herald is truly appalling.</p><p>and to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 03:02:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>tussock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34215#post34215</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34215#post34215</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yea, Angus, nice idea in general, but the minimum wage is still a ways off $12.50 an hour, so at $1000 you're talking 5% of gross yearly income for a sizable chunk of the population, and 10-15% for beneficiaries or part timers. I don't see politics being worth more than…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:56:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Victor Chou</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34209#post34209</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34209#post34209</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The Japanese have good reason to be afraid of them terrorists &ndash; their minister of justice  is just 2 degrees of Kevin Bacon away from the Bali bombers:</p><p><a href="http://www.economist.com/world/asia/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10053265" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.economist.com/world/asia/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10053265</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:25:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Shep  Cheyenne</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34206#post34206</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34206#post34206</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Angus as nice as it would be not everyone has $1000 burning a hole in the wallet. &ndash; Just my 2cents worth.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:10:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Angus Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34205#post34205</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34205#post34205</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>I would be happier with that as an argument, if everyone involved in an election had the same amount of money to spend. I don't mind restrictions on how much money people can spend, because some people start out with not very much "free speech" when they open up their…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:53:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34199#post34199</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34199#post34199</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>This bill restricts the amount of money anyone (other than the government) can spend expressing an idea. This bill demands that any free speech is addressed to as few as people as possible. This is a restriction on the right to free speech.</p></blockquote><p>I would be happier with that as…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:09:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34196#post34196</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34196#post34196</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Trying to vilify anyone who supports public funding as trying to hijack the machinery of the state, and anyone who supports more private funding as trying to buy elections really doesn't help.</p></blockquote><p>The nature of political debate in general is unfortunate.</p><p>I've caught a bit of Parliament now that it's…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:40:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Angus Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34178#post34178</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34178#post34178</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>For all its flaws, this bill – and the debate surrounding it – is about the role of money in elections, not free speech.</p></blockquote><p>Have you heard the history of the term "Public Address"?  It refers to rallies held by American political speakers that would be pamphleteered and distributed widely…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:17:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34072#post34072</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34072#post34072</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Apologies if this ends up appearing twice &mdash; it vanished into the ether on my first attempt...</p><blockquote><p>Changing countries is always a disorientating experience.</p></blockquote><p>One of the few instances in which the American variant ("disorienting") might be more appropriate :-) </p><p>Actually, Keith, you got out of Japan just in time:…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 12:04:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>simon g</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34030#post34030</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34030#post34030</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>As a free service to busy PA readers, to save you from having to wade through dozens of pages of "Your Views" on the Herald website, here they are:</p><p>1. A quote (Niemoller, Lincoln, Acton)<br />2. Another country (Hot: Pakistan, Zimbabwe, Venezuela, North Korea. Not: Nicaragua, Iraq. Perennial: Nazis)<br />3.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:26:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34022#post34022</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34022#post34022</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I haven't been paying close attention, but is there anyone on the electoral finance bill debate who's making good sense?</p><p>From what I've seen/heard, it's just been different breeds of pigs gathering around the trough trying to get the best deal for themselves. If the name of the bill had…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:11:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Raymond A Francis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34016#post34016</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34016#post34016</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>If it is all about money</p><p>And there is transparency ie we know where it comes from<br />Something Labour talk up but as yet refuse to demand</p><p>What is the difference between using your own money or using the money you removed (somewhat in surplus to their real needs) from…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 09:55:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34015#post34015</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-back-and-on-the-crusading-herald/?p=34015#post34015</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 09:55:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
