<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Legal Beagle: What next for Winston?</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337557#post337557</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337557#post337557</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Well said Tussock,( I think anyway). Interestingly Winston, commenting on Mana said he gave his heads up to Kelvin in Te Tai Tokerau  because Hone went with Dotcom. He didn't seem to have any other reason thus suggesting NZFirst can work with Mana and interestingly also ,  Rueben Taipari Porter…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2015 09:51:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337552#post337552</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337552#post337552</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>(dude desperately needs a successor)</q><br />..an 'hair apparent' perhaps?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 23:16:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>tussock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337547#post337547</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337547#post337547</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I don't give a crap about Winston, eh. National just lost a seat and have to play nice with some centrist parties now (authoritarian and reactionary ones, yes, but much less so than National themselves). Which means they can only be as crazy as they were in 2011-2014 rather than…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:05:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>sean mahoney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337501#post337501</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337501#post337501</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						yes I am struggling with the idea Winston is a progressive...but maybe I am becoming more radical with old age ...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 11:12:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Telfar Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337498#post337498</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337498#post337498</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>My inner purist thinks the Electoral Act should be amended to prohibit an MP standing in a by-election; my inner pragmatist tells me this is unlikely to happen.</q><br />I see there's a whole 'nother post on this, so I've moved my response there.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:06:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Geddis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337497#post337497</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337497#post337497</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>@Rich,</p><p>Something like that. It may or may not be a good legal argument, but I don't think s.23 precludes it in the way Graeme suggests.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:01:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337496#post337496</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337496#post337496</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Because the Electoral Act provides for Peters to become an electorate MP, an MP can't effectively hold two seats (where is that stipulated, standing orders?) and so his list seat is vacant?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 09:34:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Geddis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337493#post337493</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337493#post337493</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It does use the words “Members’ seats become vacant only as provided in Electoral Act 1993”.</q></p><p>True. But if the Speaker/Privileges Committee <strong>were</strong> to say that Peters being elected as member for Northland has vacated his list seat, it <strong>would</strong> be by virtue of the Electoral Act ... wouldn't it?…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 08:09:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andre</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337491#post337491</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337491#post337491</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Winston is a proto-Muldoonist – this was not a win for the left wing. The fact that in some quarters it is seen as such is a sign of how far right Roger Douglas and 30 years of governments chipping away at workers’ rights have taken us while eroding recognition…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:19:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337490#post337490</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337490#post337490</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Note that s.23 doesn't say "the only way a vacancy in the House can occur is through s.55 of the Electoral Act." Rather, it simply rules out one particular way in which a vacancy may have been able to occur &ndash; through the expulsion of a member .</q></p><p>It does…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:08:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>tussock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337489#post337489</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337489#post337489</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Can I just say, I'm super happy about all this. Doesn't seem to be another place to drop comment here, so this will do.</p><p>0: Minority government, WOOOOOOOOOOOOOT.</p><p>1: The centre-left seems to have sorted out getting people seats, re Te Tai Tokerau and Northland reciprocation.</p><p>2: Holy shit, National…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 23:56:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Philip Temple</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337481#post337481</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337481#post337481</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The 2012 Electoral Commission review report is worth looking at &ndash;  <a href="http://www.elections.org.nz/sites/default/files/bulk-upload/documents/Final_Report_2012_Review_of_MMP.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.elections.org.nz/sites/default/files/bulk-upload/documents/Final_Report_2012_Review_of_MMP.pdf</a><br />page 41, pars 5.6 to 5.8. This does not in any way resolve the technical argument but does suggest flexibility is favoured rather than working to the tyranny of party proportionality determined at the previous general election.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:54:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>sean mahoney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337475#post337475</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337475#post337475</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						yes sorry it wasn't serious advice ...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:23:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337474#post337474</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337474#post337474</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Surely you jest? NZF would be (justifiably) spanked by the electorate for pulling a stunt like that.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:10:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>sean mahoney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337473#post337473</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337473#post337473</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						if he was smart he would resign the northland seat and keep the list seat , then northland could have another by-election and we might get offered personal jet packs and gold plated bridges ....
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:09:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alfie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337463#post337463</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337463#post337463</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Winston Peters has <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/67546136/northland-byelection-winston-peters-to-resign-as-list-mp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">confirmed</a> that he'll resign from the NZ First list.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 10:53:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Geddis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337459#post337459</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337459#post337459</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The House has no power to make a member’s seat become vacant by expelling the member ... from membership of the House.</q></p><p>But in your scenario, the House would not be "expelling the member". Peters would remain in the House (as MP for Northland). It's just he'd be joined by…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 09:34:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337454#post337454</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337454#post337454</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Before then, we all assume Winston Peters will resign. But Peters is not required to resign, and has said he may not.</q></p><p>I didn't hear it but <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/67546136/Northland-by-election-Winston-Peters-to-resign-as-list-MP" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stuff seems to be reporting this morning</a> that he said on Morning Report that he'd definitely resign:</p><p><q>The NZ First leader, who convincingly…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 09:04:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Phil Lyth</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337452#post337452</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337452#post337452</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>We agree on one thing: statute law does not cover all bases, and clarity is needed.</p><p>My inner purist thinks the Electoral Act should be amended to prohibit an MP standing in a by-election;  my inner pragmatist tells me this is unlikely to happen.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 07:42:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337451#post337451</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-what-next-for-winston/?p=337451#post337451</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 07:42:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
