<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Legal Beagle: Three strikes (w/ updates)</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=102639#post102639</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=102639#post102639</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						If I understand Gower (and he's right), Act was wrong about their own version too, because Corrections 'serious violent' definition was broader again the Act's.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:46:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=102490#post102490</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=102490#post102490</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>David Garrett, who said in the first reading of the Sentencing and Parole Reform Bill that the victims of 77 murderers in jail “would be alive today if, at the time they were killed, this bill had been enforced. That is not arguable; it is simply arithmetic.”,</p></blockquote><p>So that would…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:08:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=102470#post102470</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=102470#post102470</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>From <a href="http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/PB/Debates/QOA/c/0/b/49HansQ_20090407_00000670-12-Three-Strikes-Proposed-Legislation.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hansard</a>:</p><blockquote><p><strong>12. Hon CLAYTON COSGROVE (Labour—Waimakariri)</strong> to the <strong>Minister of Corrections</strong>: Does she agree that information released under the Official Information Act by the Department of Corrections indicates that not one of the 423 prisoners serving life sentences would have been stopped by the proposed “three strikes” law?</p><p>**Hon…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 15:30:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=102448#post102448</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=102448#post102448</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>So Garrett asked Collins to confirm a number that was actually completely wrong?  Did she confirm it?</p><p>A quick look through Hansard didn't show it up for me unfortunately.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:23:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=102442#post102442</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=102442#post102442</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>If they have used the 78 number SINCE making the changes then that's obviously dishonest but it's not a number I've seen bandied about since the campaign?</blockquote> But it was bandied about recently in the House(not the big house)when Garrett in question time did seek the Minister of Corrections to…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:01:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=102414#post102414</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=102414#post102414</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Knowing this, Act tightened the criteria to a group of the more serious offences like rape, murder, aggravated assault &ndash; but did not get Corrections to adjust the "78 killers" figure. <strong>Act has just kept using it</strong>, without any qualification.</p></blockquote><p>Did they, though? <br />Because they were quite right to campaign…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 12:33:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=102409#post102409</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=102409#post102409</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Incidentally, that was a wanton act of journalism from Gower. Ruining the Herald's near-perfect record, he is.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 12:20:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=102407#post102407</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=102407#post102407</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						David Garrett: crap politician or the crappiest politician? <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10565790" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Patrick Gower</a> has more.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 12:19:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=97173#post97173</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=97173#post97173</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Now that's a more transparent govmint eh?</p></blockquote><p>No. Just MMP.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 17:43:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=97163#post97163</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=97163#post97163</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Metiria: no, that was a deal, it was a deal done, they're voting against their own policy.</p></blockquote><p>So this does suggest that <em>both </em> parties are voting for policies they don't believe in and we are left holding the baggage. Now that's a more transparent govmint eh?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 15:23:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=97119#post97119</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=97119#post97119</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Self-transcribed transcript:</p><blockquote><p>Wallace: ... whaddaya reckon &ndash; banning patches in Wanganui? ...</p><p>Rodney: Well, I don't think it will have much impact ... ah ... we voted for it because it ...</p><p>[interuption]</p><p>Rodney: ... well here's here's the thing, we voted for it because what it's gonna to do…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 10:44:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=97117#post97117</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=97117#post97117</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I also note this apparent endorsement from Pansy Wong</p><p>__The National-led government has introduced two pieces of legislation aimed at tackling the problem of domestic violence; the Domestic Violence (Enhancing Safety) Bill, giving police the power to issue on-the-spot protection orders keep victims safe, and the Sentencing and Parole Reform…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 10:24:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=97110#post97110</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=97110#post97110</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Judging by the Labour PR, Hide said he supported the Gang bill because he wanted to pass the three strikes. Soundslike deal.</blockquote>Yes thanks Lyndon, I just read <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&amp;objectid=10560252" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 08:48:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=97010#post97010</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=97010#post97010</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Judging by the Labour PR, Hide said he supported the Gang bill because he wanted to pass the three strikes. <em>Sounds</em> like deal.</p><p>I also note this <a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA0903/S00103.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">apparent endorsement from Pansy Wong</a></p><blockquote><p>The National-led government has introduced two pieces of legislation aimed at tackling the problem of domestic violence; the…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:37:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96773#post96773</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96773#post96773</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Did anyone see Back Benches last night? Did Rodney Hide say that 3 Strikes will pass because they have a deal with National in exchange for the Gang insignia bill having their vote?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:26:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JackElder</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96646#post96646</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96646#post96646</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						A relative of mine used to work for the police and had a good line in conversation about the things you need to consider when constructing things like holding cells.  He had a number of interesting stories about stuff like the maximum height above the floor that you can have…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:02:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andrew llewellyn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96640#post96640</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96640#post96640</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>We Should Heat Prisons With Power's Rhetoric (2006)</self-promotion></p></blockquote><p>And, by my reckoning, Simon Power would be renewable too &ndash; at least for the small investment in Bellamy's Bangers &amp; Beans once a day.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:41:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96633#post96633</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96633#post96633</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>And not even serious enough to count as a first strike anyway...</blockquote> Yeah, stuck in traffic and shouting does not for a <em>lady </em> make, so I continued on with my original impression of the fuknuckle and accepted that there are plenty of ignoranus's on the planet.IMO
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:18:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96613#post96613</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96613#post96613</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Garrett just stated on the B ,when asked why 3? NZers are a fair lot and everyone deserves a 2nd chance so 3 it is.</p><p>Well that's a little illogical. This is actually an argument for a two-strike law (your chance not to commit your second strike after committing your…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 14:35:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96612#post96612</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96612#post96612</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Garrett just stated on the B ,when asked why 3? NZers are a fair lot and everyone deserves a 2nd chance so 3 it is.</p></blockquote><p>Well that's a little illogical. This is actually an argument for a two-strike law (your chance not to commit your second strike after committing your…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 14:33:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andrew llewellyn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96611#post96611</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96611#post96611</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hee. Simon "Power". Good work. How can we squeeze "Simon Sez" in there too?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 14:26:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96608#post96608</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96608#post96608</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0606/S00356.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">We Should Heat Prisons With Power's Rhetoric (2006)</a></self-promotion>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 14:22:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andrew llewellyn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96603#post96603</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96603#post96603</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Thanks to both of you for pointing it out!</p></blockquote><p>you're welcome &ndash; I can assure you that prison food truly sucks too.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 14:01:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sam F</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96601#post96601</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96601#post96601</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Regular posters to the 'your views' section typically haven't ever had to design and build a prison. It's not just a house with locks on the outside.</p></blockquote><p>You know, I'd heard grumbling about underfloor heating in prisons before, and had somehow sneakily wondered whether it <em>was</em>  an unneeded luxury. I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:59:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96599#post96599</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96599#post96599</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Garrett just stated on the B ,when asked why 3? NZers are a fair lot and everyone deserves a 2nd chance so 3 it is. He thinks Judges are not giving out PD when a crime warrants it because they don't want appeals so they only hand out 2/3rd sentences…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:52:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96594#post96594</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96594#post96594</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I think that's most of the reason for the underfloor heating Andrew. It's not done for luxury, it's done because it would cost more than normal to put the heating above ground because prisoners would break it, or use it, so it would need to be made differently to be…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:32:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andrew llewellyn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96577#post96577</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96577#post96577</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Oh, and for the record, I''ve visited most prisons (worked for corrections for several years in the 90s).</p><p>Hawkes Bay remand unit was the scariest experience.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:44:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andrew llewellyn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96575#post96575</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96575#post96575</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>(Given you seem so jealous of their "central heating", would you let them freeze to death? Which, really, is the only alternative. Unless you want individual bar-heaters and a blowout of the electrical bill.)</p></blockquote><p>"Central heating"? A hot water pipe running through the concrete floor most likely &ndash; I asked…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:41:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96536#post96536</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96536#post96536</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Where are the Sensibles now? This case appears not to be open-and-shut as first thought. Even vigilantes have standards, don't they?</p><p><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/1995574/Two-families-accused-of-intimidation" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">DomPost 4/3/2009: Two families accused of intimidation</a></p><p><a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10559859" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Granny 4/3/2009: Jury frightened into verdict, says lawyer</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:44:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96418#post96418</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96418#post96418</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Here's a nice quote from the party of individual freedom:</p><blockquote><p>"Alter the Bill of Rights Act. We've got too hung up on people's rights."</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:29:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96395#post96395</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96395#post96395</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>A-G's office complaining your favourite bill breaches the bill of rights?</p><p>Solution: Change the BORA!</p></blockquote><p>Hilarious.  Or suicidally depressing.  One or the other.</p><p>Would have been a funny discussion though:<br />Journo: "Mr Garrett, after this criticism, do you think we should change the law?"<br />Garrett: "Yes absolutely"<br />Journo: "Oh, well…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:16:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96394#post96394</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=96394#post96394</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>A-G's office complaining your favourite bill breaches the bill of rights?</p><p>Solution: <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&amp;objectid=10559642" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Change the BORA</a>!</p><p>After all, disproportionately severe punishment is kind of the whole point.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:11:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95852#post95852</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95852#post95852</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>__An interim order for name suppression was continued as the matter was to go before the High Court following an appeal by the defence.</p><p>I read this as: the judge refused to continue name suppression, but having been advised an appeal against that refusal would be made, made an interim…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:41:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95709#post95709</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95709#post95709</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Mark &ndash; a reason was given for the suppression:</p><p>    An interim order for name suppression was continued as the matter was to go before the High Court following an appeal by the defence.</p><p>I read this as: the judge refused to continue name suppression, but having been advised an appeal…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:08:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95698#post95698</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95698#post95698</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>OK, so it's a limitation of parole for the mid-range sentences (less than life, but enough for second strike) to six months? If I've understood that correctly.</p><p>Still not good, but probably not going to affect thousands of people.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:29:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95696#post95696</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95696#post95696</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>True! Therefore:</p><p>"We should punish them by releasing them the day after they get put into prison, so that they feel the warmth and leisure of the prison system, but then get denied it and released into the harsh world of parole and weekly checkups with their parole officer."</p><p>SST…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:27:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95689#post95689</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95689#post95689</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I should add: the time spent subject to conditions will of course be shorter on the second strike. Offenders who are paroled can be subject to conditions for the entire period of their nominal sentence plus six months. Without early release, it will be six months maximum.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:15:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95687#post95687</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95687#post95687</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>You know the current state of this law well Graeme.</p><p>Does this mean that we're going to be seeing more prisoners released later (either second strike, or murder on first strike) but with no parole at all?</p></blockquote><p>It may surprise you, but no.</p><p>1. All released murderers are on parole…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:12:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95673#post95673</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95673#post95673</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>But Kyle the prisoners themselves HATE parole because then they miss out on the central-heating and TV-of-cutting-edge-display-technology. </p><p>=|</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:10:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95669#post95669</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95669#post95669</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The law does a couple of other things as well:</p></blockquote><p>You know the current state of this law well Graeme.</p><p>Does this mean that we're going to be seeing more prisoners released later (either second strike, or murder on first strike) but with no parole at all?</p><p>Releasing serious violent…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:56:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95661#post95661</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95661#post95661</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Didn't Mr Garrett himself point out that there would have been less than 100 or so prisoners in jail due to this law, had it already been in place?</blockquote>The critical question is how long it had hypothetically been in place for. You get not-many extra for the usual projection periods…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:32:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95657#post95657</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95657#post95657</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>How, I must ask? By ensuring that the extra parole officers are no longer required by refusing parole? Didn't Mr Garrett himself point out that there would have been less than 100 or so prisoners in jail due to this law, had it already been in place?</p></blockquote><p>In jail for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:21:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95652#post95652</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95652#post95652</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Did anyone happen to catch Backbenchers last night &ndash; admittedly not the best format for an informed debate, however &ndash; where Heather Roy played her expected part and crowed that the "Three-Strikes Law" (her words) would solve the problems that the corrections department is current having.</p><p>How, I must ask?…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:16:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95646#post95646</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95646#post95646</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>a little imagination from legislators could go a long way.<br />Instead of Franchise deals.</p></blockquote><p>Sure you're not thinking of copyright law? :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:29:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95645#post95645</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95645#post95645</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Mark &ndash; a reason was given for the suppression:</p><blockquote><p>An interim order for name suppression was continued as the matter was to go before the High Court following an appeal by the defence.</p></blockquote><p>I read this as: the judge refused to continue name suppression, but having been advised an appeal…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:23:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95635#post95635</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95635#post95635</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>But yes, whole heartedly, three strikes? Why not just change the county's name New Illinois...</p><p>a little imagination from legislators could go a long way.Instead of Franchise deals.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 04:39:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95634#post95634</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95634#post95634</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>< I'm pretty comfortable with our jury system, and a system that allows judges who have heard all the evidence to ... um ... actually judge</p></blockquote><p>There's something about having convicted  musicians serving  four years prison sentences for sexual violation whilst having name suppression upheld that goads me to uncomfortably question some of the judges judgment.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 04:33:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95610#post95610</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95610#post95610</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p><em>I'm pretty comfortable with our jury system, and a system that allows judges who have heard all the evidence to ... um ... actually judge</em></p><p>really?</p></blockquote><p>Yup. The American justice system has been bent out of shape by gimmick sentencing laws passed by cynical politicians. Sentences should be set by…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:39:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95596#post95596</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95596#post95596</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>really?</p></blockquote><p>Yes. Why?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:19:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95591#post95591</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95591#post95591</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>If these 'snob yobs' were South Auckland hoods</p></blockquote><p>Quite:<br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dz0GqyfeEgs" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dz0GqyfeEgs</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:02:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95571#post95571</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95571#post95571</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'm pretty comfortable with our jury system, and a system that allows judges who have heard all the evidence to ... um ... actually judge</p></blockquote><p>really?</p><p><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/4859852a19715.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.stuff.co.nz/4859852a19715.html</a></p><p>.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:46:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95268#post95268</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95268#post95268</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I know someone who's in a prison professionally.</p></blockquote><p>I didn't know there was money in it! All this time I've been wasting, I should be off robbing banks and getting caught.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:17:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95240#post95240</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95240#post95240</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>If these 'snob yobs' were South Auckland hoods, there'd be calls for the problem to be solved with a B-52 Stratofortress:</p><p><a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10558307" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rampaging youths trash cars, homes</a></p><blockquote><p>Five teenagers arrested yesterday allegedly drove around Auckland on a six-hour vandalism rampage, causing more than $30,000 of damage to cars and property in some…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:24:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95213#post95213</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95213#post95213</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>If they were to replace the third strike consequence of life with 25 years non-parole with preventive detention with a non-parole period equal to the finite sentence that would have been imposed, I'd probably still be opposed, but I'd have a much harder time making the case.</p></blockquote><p>Yes.  It's the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:17:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95161#post95161</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95161#post95161</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Third post and my real problem with the legislation.</p><p>Hilary is dead right</p><blockquote><p>There are a whole lot of other reasons whereby the victims might have been alive today,...</p></blockquote><p>The bill supposes that the best way to prevent crime is to create punitive deterrents. In this case particularly vengeful ones.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:31:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95154#post95154</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95154#post95154</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The bill looks halfway reasonable, if you believe in prison as a form of deterrence. </p><p>But only halfway. </p><p>Some crimes are in some are out, who got to pick which crimes? Some are obviously about violence but others seem to be about culture (eg incest) &ndash; not a good thing…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:11:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95153#post95153</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95153#post95153</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Apologies up front I'm going to make a couple of separate posts</p><p>I still don't really know the answer to Lucy's question.</p><p>How many of "the 78" would have been protected by the bill as it exists now. Not the bill SST drafted. How many of the criminals had served…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:06:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95137#post95137</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95137#post95137</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I know someone who's in a prison professionally. And I suspect (but naturally can't prove) that if you surveyed such people they would think this kind of law is a bad idea. Not least because it will make their job harder and more dangerous (and hence make it more difficult…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:25:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95130#post95130</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95130#post95130</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>How To Troll Your Own Legislation In Nine Easy Steps?</p></blockquote><p>Well, Labour accused National MPs of filibustering the EFA repeal the other day, so it's not entirely without precedent...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:02:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95124#post95124</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95124#post95124</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Ha, this thread turned rather hilarious didn't it? A bunch of people relatively calmly wading through the practical implications of the legislation, before one of the lead drivers of that legislation weighs in, tells everyone they know nothing about prison as a deterrent because they don't have a background like…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:15:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95121#post95121</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95121#post95121</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>We need a word for this, we really do. "Irony" just doesn't seem sufficient.</p></blockquote><p>How To Troll Your Own Legislation In Nine Easy Steps?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:07:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95116#post95116</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95116#post95116</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Ha, this thread turned rather hilarious didn't it?  A bunch of people relatively calmly wading through the practical implications of the legislation, before one of the lead drivers of that legislation weighs in, tells everyone they know nothing about prison as a deterrent because they don't have a background like…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:34:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95088#post95088</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95088#post95088</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I think there are a couple of serious technical problems with a three strikes law. The first Graeme identified in his main post &ndash; a mandatory 25 year sentence may simply be too harsh a punishment for a particular third offence.</p></blockquote><p>This concern turned out to be over-stated (my original…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:01:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95084#post95084</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95084#post95084</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Do we keep them in prison until they die, even if they otherwise qualify for parole? What about rest homes? How would the other residents feel then?</p></blockquote><p>Perhaps they'll be forced to take the law into their own hands, as happened in Owen Marshall's excellent gothic short story "The Rule…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:35:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95074#post95074</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95074#post95074</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I responded to some dork </p><p>no-one here &ndash; ironically it seems with the exception of Lucy Stewart &ndash; is at all interested in debating</p></blockquote><p>We need a word for this, we really do. "Irony" just doesn't seem sufficient.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:14:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95073#post95073</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95073#post95073</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Secondly, because there is no possibility of early release for genuine rehabilitation, the bill requires continued imprisonment even where inmates are no longer likely to re-offend, even where they did not 'deserve' a 25 year sentence on purely retributive grounds.</p></blockquote><p>There's also the problem of what you *do* with them…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 07:32:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95072#post95072</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95072#post95072</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>But this is getting tedious...no-one here &ndash; ironically it seems with the exception of Lucy Stewart &ndash; is at all interested in debating the "three strikes" proposal...like all intellectuall lefties, you just KNOW you're right and those of us who disagree are redneck idiot bigots (feel free to add another…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 04:03:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95068#post95068</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95068#post95068</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						What would the two-wrongs-make-a-right brigade regard as the fence at the top? Conscription? Gakushu juku? Eugenics? Merging religion and the state? The DINA or BOPE? Or all of the above (Ingsoc)?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:03:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95066#post95066</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95066#post95066</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Sorry &ndash; 'strikes' not 'strokes' I hope the bill isn't bringing back flogging of prisoners.</p></blockquote><p>Don't worry, I'm sure it's on the wish-list.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:11:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95064#post95064</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95064#post95064</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						One thing you've certainly achieved here, Mr Garrett, is to engender a certain sympathy for Rodney Hide. While I'm sure that, once again, you've no idea what I'm talking about, you're welcome to take it as a compliment.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:08:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hilary Stace</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95063#post95063</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95063#post95063</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Sorry &ndash; 'strikes' not 'strokes' I hope the bill isn't bringing back flogging of prisoners.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:03:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hilary Stace</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95062#post95062</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95062#post95062</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>In other words, had a three strikes law been in force when those 78 people killed someone else, their victims would be alive today &ndash; or at least their deaths would have been from some other cause.</p></blockquote><p>David ,this is the flaw in your argument. There are a whole lot…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:01:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95061#post95061</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95061#post95061</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I actually have known quite a few who have done time!<br />...<br />Have you actually BEEN inside a prison Lucy? I have, several of them.<br />...<br />I had experiences during eleven years working in the oil drilling industry in several different countries that most middle class people have not had.…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:56:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95059#post95059</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95059#post95059</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>What "repeated allusions" would they be? I responded to some dork suggesting that I was an uneducated redneck ...I mentioned my work history prior to returning to the Ivory Tower I had abandoned 11 years previously just once...</p><p>But this is getting tedious...no-one here &ndash; ironically it seems with the…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:43:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95058#post95058</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95058#post95058</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>like all intellectuall lefties, you just KNOW you're right and those of us who disagree are redneck idiot bigots</p></blockquote><p>This is quite possible the most inadvertently comical sentence I've read all year. "Like all intellectual lefties, you generalise about other people!" Really, it is quite priceless.</p><p>On the other hand,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:38:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Garrett</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95057#post95057</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95057#post95057</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Hopefully you're over the oil rig posturing &ndash; dressing up as some kind of Village People stereotype's hardly likely to get anyone to take you seriously, in or out of jail.</p></blockquote><p>I haven't a clue what you are on about..Although I guess back in Aberdeen in 1977 some of us…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:27:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95056#post95056</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95056#post95056</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Yes Lucy, they were all convicted and sentenced for offences which would have qualified them as "strikers" under the Bill as I drafted it, which actually had, as "strike" offences, pretty much the same list as it has now. I then thought the list a little too broad and narrowed…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:22:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95055#post95055</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95055#post95055</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Because the Sentencing and Parole Reform Bill sounds too draconian?</p></blockquote><p>Quite right. Blame carnival excess last night. I was thinking about how "three strikes" set the tone.</p><blockquote><p>Surely these sneering references to my wining a "king of the proles" competition cannot be a reference to members of the proletariat,</p></blockquote><p>Maybe…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:43:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95053#post95053</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95053#post95053</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>This is a left wing site isn't it? Are you all champions of the "proles" or is that only the ones who agree with you?</p></blockquote><p>Now you're just being cute. Left wing, right wing &ndash; you know there's more to people than that, particularly if they're genuinely concerned about finding…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:36:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Garrett</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95051#post95051</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95051#post95051</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>David, since you're participating, how many of those 78 people you mention had been sentences to three or more sentences of more than five years? You say they had served more than three "sentence" episodes; you do not mention whether in all cases the length of these would have qualified…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:15:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95050#post95050</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95050#post95050</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>You know, this discussion might have been completely different if the legislation were called the Recidivist Violent Offender Incapacitation Bill.</p></blockquote><p>Because the Sentencing and Parole Reform Bill sounds too draconian?</p><p>[I believe "Reform" is in there because to substantively amend separate pieces of legislation &ndash; generally not allowed under standing…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:08:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95049#post95049</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95049#post95049</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>You know, this discussion might have been completely different if the legislation were called the Recidivist Violent Offender Incapacitation Bill.</p></blockquote><p>Indeed. For starters, "(R)VOIB" is close enough to "VOIP" to be confusing.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:07:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95048#post95048</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95048#post95048</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						You know, this discussion might have been completely different if the legislation were called the Recidivist Violent Offender Incapacitation Bill.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:59:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95047#post95047</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95047#post95047</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>This *would* be the afternoon my internet connection went down, wouldn't it? </p><p>David, since you're participating, how many of those 78 people you mention had been sentences to three or more sentences of more than five years? You say they had served more than three "sentence" episodes; you do not…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:44:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95046#post95046</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95046#post95046</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I am unsure how suggesting that Lucy is probably middle class is an "attack" since I am, by definition, a member of the middle class myself...</p></blockquote><p>Take "... attacked Lucy" as shorthand for "attacked Lucy's argument". Let's agree to call it "responded to... ", if "attacked" is too colourful. Nevertheless,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:17:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95045#post95045</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95045#post95045</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Guys who work on offshore rigs &ndash; particularly out of Morgan City Louisiana &ndash; are not usually choir boys...</p></blockquote><p>Oh, man! I would *so* win a 'Louisiana proles' contest! It's a pity I think the whole concept is flawed...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:00:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95043#post95043</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95043#post95043</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Wadestown liberals....</p></blockquote><p>Been a long time since I've heard that one. <br />As I said earlier, pretentious prolier-than-thou contest. And you're still at it. So long as sweeping generalisations are all the go, I'll take the opportunity to note that the world's a far more complex and diverse place than the average…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 17:49:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95042#post95042</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95042#post95042</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Their experiences and perspectives are an interesting counterpoint to the academics' ...and those of the Wadestown liberals....</p></blockquote><p>I'd go easy on the labels, unless you want me to break out "oilrig wanker". The thing is: you don't know us, and assuming that we have had this or that experience is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 17:49:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Garrett</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95041#post95041</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95041#post95041</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>David, your first comment here attacked Lucy for allegedly being "middle class", so maybe the high horse could use a rest, huh?</p><p><br />I am unsure how suggesting that Lucy is probably middle class is an "attack" since I am, by definition, a member of the middle class myself...the difference is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 17:38:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Garrett</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95040#post95040</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95040#post95040</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I don't how to incorporate his  comment (as others have done in their posts) but this is an attempt to respond to Stephen Judd.</p><p>The answer to your question &ndash; as usual in academic papers &ndash; is less than clear.  And as usual, different academics say different things, depending on…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 16:45:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95039#post95039</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95039#post95039</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>And, it needs to be said, this is an issue of race. Half of NZ's prison population is Māori, who are imprisoned at almost 7 times the rate of the rest of the population. "Getting tough on criminals" means getting tough on Māori... easy to see why it's a popular…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 16:28:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95038#post95038</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95038#post95038</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>And, it needs to be said, this is an issue of race. Half of NZ's prison population is Māori, who are imprisoned at almost 7 times the rate of the rest of the population. "Getting tough on criminals" means getting tough on Māori... easy to see why it's a popular…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 15:15:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95037#post95037</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95037#post95037</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Well that's not true. Apart from the fact that we didn't have prisons 200 years ago.</p><p>Prisons are very different, and in some areas NZ Corrections have programmes of international standards in terms of recidivism.</p></blockquote><p>You're right, I did overstate things a little. While prisons as an institution are largely…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 15:00:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95034#post95034</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95034#post95034</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Some of the comment since my post has been reasonable; much has simply been ad hominem argument directed at me personally &ndash; no surprise there.</p></blockquote><p>David, your first comment here attacked Lucy for allegedly being "middle class", so maybe the high horse could use a rest, huh?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:31:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95033#post95033</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95033#post95033</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I also wonder how many of the people commenting have actually READ the Bill? The ACT version is still available on our website; the latest incarnation which blends ours into National's Sentencing and Parole Reform Bill is available on parliament's website.</p><p>Those who can be bothered to actually look at…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:55:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hilary Stace</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95032#post95032</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95032#post95032</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Listening to the lived experience of those who have been in prison regularly can be the best way to inform the rest of us. People don't generally make rational decisions to commit crime while considering all the possible consequences. More likely their lives are already likely to be chaotic and…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:40:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95031#post95031</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95031#post95031</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						David, to what do those papers attribute the crime reduction? Deterrence, or the fact that offenders can't reoffend while in jail? Both? Something else?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:32:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Garrett</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95030#post95030</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95030#post95030</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Some of the comment since my post has been reasonable; much has simply been ad hominem argument directed at me personally &ndash; no surprise there.</p><p>May I suggest that anyone considering adding to this "debate" first looks at the post by Mr Edgeler which began this ("thread" &ndash; is that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:19:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95029#post95029</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95029#post95029</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Apropos deterrence: my summer reading has been <a href="http://www.exclassics.com/newgate/ngintro.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Newgate Calendar</a>, which is a prurient compendium of accounts of 18th century crimes.</p><p>At the time the Newgate Calendar was being compiled, England still had the so-called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloody_Code" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bloody Code</a>, which imposed the death penalty for anything more serious than minor theft (this…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:17:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95027#post95027</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95027#post95027</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>. . . if Graeme Burton is stabbing people in prison, then we're failing to protect society from him, because prisoners are also part of society. If we say they aren't, if we exclude them to that level, then no wonder they don't see any value in playing by society's…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:44:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95026#post95026</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95026#post95026</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Prison isn't <em>meant</em>   to be a picnic. That goes towards deterrence and retribution. To that extent I'd probably be opposed to prisoners getting 6 course meals from famous chefs, regular rounds of golf, fishing trips, day trips to Rainbow's End, access to the finest whores, shopping sprees, pedicures, fine wines,…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:13:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95024#post95024</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95024#post95024</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Aw, thanks, guys.</p><p>Leading on from Steven and Joe's posts, you both mirror my experiences with petty criminals: they turn to crime because it seems easier, and it seems easier because life seems insurmountable if you're semi-literate, or very poor, or just not very bright. Turning prisons into hard-labour camps…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 08:38:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95022#post95022</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95022#post95022</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Russell, off-topic but I hope you were accompanying Mr Dubber in his pursuit of Lagavulin post-Blend.  You'd both earned it.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 01:30:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95021#post95021</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95021#post95021</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hey all, thanks for keeping it vigorous but seemly. A lot of posts rocked, but I believe Lucy's rocked most of all.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 01:23:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95020#post95020</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95020#post95020</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>prolier-than-thou</p></blockquote><p>Well played, sir!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 00:13:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95019#post95019</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95019#post95019</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Prisons in NZ are largely unchanged from 50, 100, or even 200 years ago. They do very little to stop reoffending, because that has never been part of their design.</p></blockquote><p>Well that's not true. Apart from the fact that we didn't have prisons 200 years ago.</p><p>Prisons are very different,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 00:12:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95018#post95018</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95018#post95018</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Because of where I happen to live, I've been 'blest' in the last few months with three ex-jailbird neighbours who've been released into the 'community'. One's a decent guy, really trying to make it, the other two live from one drink to the next. All swear they'll never wind up…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 22:03:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Blake Monkley</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95017#post95017</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95017#post95017</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						David, It is possible to exact justice without vengeance. Vengeance does not heal &ndash; not us, not them. It is common sense to help people to re-enter society in better shape than they were when they came to prison. Experiences of dignity and creativity can contribute to that goal. We…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 21:02:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95016#post95016</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95016#post95016</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Lucy Stewart illustrates the reality that by and large, the middle class don't understand that deprivation of liberty per se is NOT a great punishment for many criminals.</p></blockquote><p>I'll cheerfully cop to being a hideously overprivileged upper-middle-class white girl who's never been near a prison. Funnily enough, though, I can…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 20:51:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95015#post95015</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95015#post95015</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Don't worry George, I <em>know</em> I didn't check mine either. Somehow it wasn't important :)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:47:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95014#post95014</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95014#post95014</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hmmm, I must have been upset; there are grammatical mistakes all over the place above.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:33:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95013#post95013</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95013#post95013</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Have you actually BEEN inside a prison Lucy? I have, several of them.</p></blockquote><p>I have too Garrett,and I'm not middle, I'm <em>all</em>  class and of all those in our already overcrowded system that I know/ have known/aren't dead,not one occasion was a ride in the friggin park for any of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:19:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95012#post95012</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95012#post95012</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I am middle class, and it doesn't matter shit to this. It's totally irrelevant. I could be wealthy, and come from Timbuctoo and still know that being in a NZ prison is totally shit.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:00:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95011#post95011</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95011#post95011</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Oh, and Garrett, I'm not middle-class either. I know people who've been inside, I grew up with 3 tinny houses on my street and a gang pad around the corner. They've all gone, thankfully, because of social changes in the neighborhood.</p><p>The people who don't know anything much about criminality…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:05:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95010#post95010</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95010#post95010</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Prisons in NZ are largely unchanged from 50, 100, or even 200 years ago.</p></blockquote><p>And the SST wants to knock them back another hundred or so.</p><p>This <a href="http://wapedia.mobi/en/Dei_delitti_e_delle_pene" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">wee book</a> was published in 1764. Still very advanced compared to the thinking of Garrett et al.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 17:57:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Susan Snowdon</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95009#post95009</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95009#post95009</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Habitual crims are relatively happy with three square meals a day cooked and paid for by someone else, TV 24/7 if they wish, gyms that as Simon Power said in the House that would cost a hefty annual fee out in the community, and being in a place where work…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 17:53:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95008#post95008</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95008#post95008</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Lucy Stewart illustrates the reality that by and large, the middle class don't understand that deprivation of liberty per se is NOT a great punishment for many criminals.</p></blockquote><p>David, what you're proposing is more of the same. </p><p>That "central heating" you talk about? It doesn't make NZ prisons very warm…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 17:47:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95007#post95007</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95007#post95007</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Habitual crims are relatively happy with three square meals a day cooked and paid for by someone else, TV 24/7 if they wish, gyms that as Simon Power said in the House that would cost a hefty annual fee out in the community, and being in a place where work…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:51:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matt Nippert</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95006#post95006</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95006#post95006</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>David,</p><p>I can't speak for Lucy, but I've been inside Pare (including D block and the child sex offenders wing), Rimutaka, Auckland Central Remand, and also the new women's facility down in Manukau. While the recently-build facilities have that "new building" smell, they are uniformly dreary places.</p><p>Even in lower…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:45:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95005#post95005</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95005#post95005</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Have you actually BEEN inside a prison Lucy? I have, several of them.</p></blockquote><p>No underfloor heating, CRT TVs *and* visits by David Garrett? Aren't these people suffering enough?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:41:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95004#post95004</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95004#post95004</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>David, if being in prison is nice, how come people aren't lining up for it? </p><p>You may be confusing tough talk with desire. Just because they have to make light of the burden of being inside doesn't mean it is something they would choose.</p><p>I can understand that some people…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:39:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95003#post95003</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95003#post95003</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I know people are speaking highly of Chris Hocquard on the other thread, but for purposes of this one I'd just like to call</p><p>BINGO!</p></blockquote><p>I'd be more interested in whether Mr. Hocquard's client list includes the very industry groups and commercial entities that have been the most vocal proponents…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:28:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Garrett</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95002#post95002</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=95002#post95002</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Lucy Stewart illustrates the reality that by and large, the middle class don't understand that deprivation of liberty per se is NOT a great punishment for many criminals. </p><p>You are quite right; depriving me of the ability to stop in at the pub for a beer on the way home…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:49:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>stephen walker</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94996#post94996</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94996#post94996</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>would result in your Interest being turned off</p></blockquote><p>you mean they can deprive me of sex, drugs and rock and roll <em>and</em>   the internet?</p><p>OMG, these really are fascist MFers we are up against!</p><p>(woops, didn't mean to personalise it, Russell)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:04:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94969#post94969</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94969#post94969</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The idea that three accusations of copyright infringement would result in your Interest being turned off.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:53:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94953#post94953</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94953#post94953</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						eh? serious? why?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:39:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94928#post94928</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94928#post94928</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>LOL Google News finds me this amusing gem. Emma's slip up is nothing compared to this</p></blockquote><p>Er, actually? Section 92A was also known as the "three strikes" law at one point, and that's what they're referencing. My techie fiance thought that's what I was talking about when I asked him…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:11:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94914#post94914</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94914#post94914</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						LOL Google News finds me this amusing gem. <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/02/kiwi-three-strikes-law-countered-with-internet-blackout.ars" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Emma's slip up is nothing compared to this</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:10:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94911#post94911</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94911#post94911</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'm a bit out of touch with how many murders are committed in NZ every year these days (thirty?), but i'd guess that of those murders, all but maybe one or two would have been committed by people with some kind of previous serious convictions and probably prision time.</p></blockquote><p>Prior…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:50:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>icehawk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94900#post94900</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94900#post94900</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Hmm.</p><p>Has any analysis been done on just how many people would have been affected by this in the last few years?  Does anyone have a link to such analysis?</p><p>I realise an injustice is an injustice whether it's committed on one person or on three hundred.  But I do…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:17:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94880#post94880</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94880#post94880</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'm a bit out of touch with how many murders are committed in NZ every year these days (thirty?), but i'd guess that of those murders, all but maybe one or two would have been committed by people with some kind of previous serious convictions and probably prision time.</p></blockquote><p>Around…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:13:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94875#post94875</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94875#post94875</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I did think about this prospect, but ultimately decided I wasn't looking at it objectively, but rather giving the rationale of those who felt this way, and figured it was accurate.</p></blockquote><p>Yes.</p><p>And to be fair, my 'research' isn't a fair comparison either.</p><p>A more valid one would be 'would…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:06:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Edward  Siddle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94855#post94855</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94855#post94855</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Noone has really picked up a point earlier made by Graeme about the necessity for judges to impose life without parole sentences for murder when it is the second (or subsequent to second) strike.  I'm a bit out of touch with how many murders are committed in NZ every year…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:27:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94842#post94842</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94842#post94842</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>There's a statement calling out for a little research into whether you're more likely to be injured by another person in prison, or out of prison.</p></blockquote><p>Almost certainly in prison.</p><p>I did think about this prospect, but ultimately decided I wasn't looking at it objectively, but rather giving the rationale…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:54:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94835#post94835</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94835#post94835</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>You have proved that you are incapable of functioning in civil society, so we're going to send you to prison where you can't hurt anyone.</p></blockquote><p>There's a statement calling out for a little research into whether you're more likely to be injured by another person in prison, or out of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:35:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94828#post94828</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94828#post94828</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Heh, obviously that should be on my thread. Duh. Anyone looking into what happened to my and Graeme's mod powers? There'll be lots of love...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:13:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94824#post94824</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94824#post94824</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>For those not being inundated with S92 emails, I thought I'd share this.</p><blockquote><p>Hysterical response to Copyright changes rings alarms</p><p>Principal of Entertainment Law Firm, Dominion Law Chris Hocquard has this to contribute to the ongoing debate over the implementation of a Code of Conduct for ISPs relating to repeat…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:11:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94820#post94820</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94820#post94820</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Actually, hey, that's an idea: lock David Garret in a hotel room with a plasma TV for five years and see if he still thinks it's better than they deserve afterwards.</p></blockquote><p>Best idea I've heard all month.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:00:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94819#post94819</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94819#post94819</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Indeed. Also, the idea of exile would perfectly serve the incapacitation criterion, but no one likes that idea any more, because being abroad just isn't as <em>punishing</em>  as it may have been in the past.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:52:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94817#post94817</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94817#post94817</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>I wouldn't underrate retribution as a motive, personally. "Send you to a prison where you can't hurt anyone" is only half the story. The other half is "Where you will also get hurt yourself quite a lot, and where your days will be spent in the misery of deprivation that…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:47:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94806#post94806</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94806#post94806</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I wouldn't underrate retribution as a motive, personally. "Send you to a prison where you can't hurt anyone" is only half the story. The other half is "Where you will also get hurt yourself quite a lot, and where your days will be spent in the misery of deprivation that…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:18:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94805#post94805</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94805#post94805</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>They're not just not 'judging the risk that closely': by and large they don't know what the sentence IS. Ergo changing it isn't going to make the blindest bit of difference as far as deterrance goes. (Though because of the publicity obviously this bill is different.)</p></blockquote><p>Yup, that's my point.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:13:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94804#post94804</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94804#post94804</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Yes exactly. That's the basic fault with penalties as deterrents.</p></blockquote><p>David Garrett and the Sensible Sentencing Trust really are not thinking of this law, or any of the other increases in sentences they've been pushing over the last decade or more as using the criminal justice system as a deterrent.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:11:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94799#post94799</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94799#post94799</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>My experience (which admittedly is down the not 25 years end of the scale) is that people simply don't think they're going to get caught. Therefore the penalty is irrelevant.</p></blockquote><p>Yes exactly. That's the basic fault with penalties as deterrents. People either commit crimes in the heat of the moment/passion…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:02:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94798#post94798</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94798#post94798</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Therefore the penalty is irrelevant</p></blockquote><p>Not much relevant to deterrence, for sure. Highly relevant to other concepts in punishment. Incapacitation. Retribution. Maybe even rehabilitation, if you are figuring that a longer term might be the only way to get through to some people who have already been tried on a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:01:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94793#post94793</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94793#post94793</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>My experience (which admittedly is down the not 25 years end of the scale) is that people simply don't think they're going to get caught. Therefore the penalty is irrelevant.</p></blockquote><p>I think that's true of everyone who breaks the law. They magnify the rewards, and reduce the risk. I don't…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:54:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94768#post94768</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94768#post94768</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Although I have been arguing for a while that deterrence doesn't work by adding a couple of years to a possible sentence (no offender would really be judging the risk that closely, assuming any of them fully understand the sentencing implications of their crime) &ndash; to work it has to…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:51:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94761#post94761</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94761#post94761</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Stay away from the serious violence, rape, murder.</p></blockquote><p>This provides me with a lead in to discuss the other change to be inserted by this bill. </p><p>As well as being the mechanism for fulfilling their promise to ACT to support three strikes legislation to select committee, and the means by…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:41:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94755#post94755</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94755#post94755</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Seems like a classic case of Kiwis at work. They will overwhelmingly vote in a Government that differs from it's opponent in only quite minor ways, once you actually get down to nitty gritties. We bring in a law that sounds like a big change, but once the actual human…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:24:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94753#post94753</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94753#post94753</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Summary of this thought: This law is not aimed at the minds of criminals, who it considers to be lost causes. It's aimed at the society in which they are offending, which can be made happier and safer.</p></blockquote><p>Yup I would largely agree with that.  <br />Although I have been arguing…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:08:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94749#post94749</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94749#post94749</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Minor drug dealing, unarmed robberies, traffic offences &ndash; all fine. Stay away from the serious violence, rape, murder. Your 5 year crime is suddenly going to cost you 25.</p></blockquote><p>Even <em>major</em>  drug dealing isn't going to get you a third strike. For something to count as a strike, a few…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:03:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Evan Yates</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94748#post94748</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94748#post94748</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>On the non-legal/intellectual front, I am reading this thread with tears rolling down my cheeks, thinking of all the poor sods who are going to have to be murdered, beaten, robbed, raped or assaulted for these new laws to be tested...</p><p>I don't think I could ever work in the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:02:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94745#post94745</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94745#post94745</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Seriously though, how big is the deterrence and correction side of this law meant to be? To me it's so much more about protecting society, and, perhaps elements of 'seeing justice done' or even revenge. I think this way mostly because of the political dimension the initiators of the law…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:50:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94738#post94738</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94738#post94738</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Interesting that large scale fraud isn't on the list of crimes.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:41:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94732#post94732</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94732#post94732</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It just gets more and more liberal :-)</p></blockquote><p>Interesting &ndash; the fewer and fewer circumstances in which it will apply seems like a good thing.  Effectively they are giving the sentencing judge some leeway in deciding what's a strike, although clearly a pretty-damn-serious-enough chain of crimes will trigger that 25yr…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:30:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94725#post94725</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94725#post94725</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>If the offence that would constitute the third strike deserves a four year sentence, then a four-year sentence results.</p></blockquote><p>Note to criminals: When you're on strike 2, you need to think really carefully about your next criminal activity. Minor drug dealing, unarmed robberies, traffic offences &ndash; all fine. Stay away…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:19:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94718#post94718</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94718#post94718</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>WH that seems to be saying the opposite of what I'm driving at. It sort of says that criminals have a "criminal mindset", much more than they have any particular hangups with particular forms of law-breaking. Interesting, indeed.</p><p>It has to be remembered that there are several purposes of imprisonment,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:01:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94709#post94709</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94709#post94709</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Criminal A, upon release, commits (entirely consensual) incest. The judge upon looking at the situation, and decides it's not all that serious. A life sentence is not required. The judge can impose a non-custodial sentence (e.g. community work) or a custodial sentence of up to (but not including) five years'…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:51:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94681#post94681</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94681#post94681</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>There are some interesting statistics on recidivism and re-imprisonment rates on the <a href="http://www.corrections.govt.nz/research.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Corrections website</a>.  It is said that 34% of offenders who serve a sentence of more than 5 years will be re-imprisoned:</p><p><a href="http://www.corrections.govt.nz/research/reconviction-patterns-of-released-prisoners-a-36-months-follow-up-analysis.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.corrections.govt.nz/research/reconviction-patterns-of-released-prisoners-a-36-months-follow-up-analysis.html</a></p><blockquote><p>It is generally accepted, based on a wide range of studies, that most offenders do not…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:53:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94645#post94645</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94645#post94645</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Ben, certainly you're right about the pattern, but you should also remember that it's two acts of paedophilia serious enough to warrant a five year prison term (on separate occasions). It doesn't deal with the pattern issue, but it does slightly mitigate the injustice.</p></blockquote><p>For sure, it's a pattern of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:38:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94603#post94603</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94603#post94603</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Further to my last post, I should correct an error:</p><p>I stated in response to a question earlier:</p><blockquote><p><em>Except that I assume the power of a judge to order a non-custodial sentence for the third offence would be removed by the Bill &ndash; is this correct?</em> </p><p>For the third strike,…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:49:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94598#post94598</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94598#post94598</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						"Wired". I'm not really "wirted" for anything.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:38:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94596#post94596</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94596#post94596</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It just gets more and more liberal :-)</p></blockquote><p>Are they just appeasing their right wing and being secretevely sane? That's not what I'm wirted to expect from the tories.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:38:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94588#post94588</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94588#post94588</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Edward, I don't think you should rely on the manifest injustice bit, however there is something else I've just noticed.</p><p>I've just re-read the section 7 report, and a line in it had me re-read a new section.</p><p>When sentencing someone on a third strike, it will only result in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:21:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Edward  Siddle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94581#post94581</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94581#post94581</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						If they're going to put in a thing about 'manifestly unjust' in the new 3 strikes law then it in theory answers most of the issues about odd combinations of crimes resulting in outrageous sentences upon a 3rd strike that people here have raised.  Thanks for pointing it out (to…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:24:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94571#post94571</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94571#post94571</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Edward &ndash; I don't think that would apply in practice. There is no situation in which life with 10 years non-parole is manfestly unjust in which an 8 year term is going to be just.</p><p>The one case I can remember this being used was a really old guy who'd…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:57:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Edward  Siddle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94560#post94560</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94560#post94560</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Graeme<br />I think Gareth's example from a bit earlier (3.49pm post) still holds regarding murder as a first offence.</p><p>Sentencing Act 2002 s102 states:<br />      (1) An offender who is convicted of murder must be sentenced to imprisonment for life unless, given the circumstances of the offence and the offender, a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:35:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94549#post94549</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94549#post94549</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						(I was right the first time, huh. Double D'oh).
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:08:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94548#post94548</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94548#post94548</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>why are we really bothering</p></blockquote><p>But most impotantly it will get politicians in the news &ndash; sigh.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:05:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94546#post94546</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94546#post94546</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>D'oh<br /><strong>DON'T</strong> have to be your first offence</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:02:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94545#post94545</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94545#post94545</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Can I ask what are the realistic offences to be considered a first strike? i.e. what offence will likely get you >5 years as a first offence?  (Not that these have to be your first offence &ndash; while this law isn't retroactive, sentencing will still take into account older crimes).…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:01:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94542#post94542</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94542#post94542</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>You start with, say, murder at the lower end of offending. 8 years.</p></blockquote><p>Murder already has a minimum sentence of life imprisonment, with a minimum non-parole period of 10 years.</p><p>If someone commits a murder, and does an aggravated robbery on being paroled, it is highly likely they will be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:54:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94539#post94539</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94539#post94539</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks for the info Graeme.  I find myself siding with your view that it's not as horrifically stringent as some when put in practice but still have issues with the basic justice of that third strike.</p><p>I'm also considering a "decreasing slide in severity" of crimes.  You start with, say,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:49:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94538#post94538</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94538#post94538</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Ben, certainly you're right about the pattern, but you should also remember that it's two acts of paedophilia serious enough to warrant a five year prison term (on separate occasions). It doesn't deal with the pattern issue, but it does slightly mitigate the injustice.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:46:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94533#post94533</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94533#post94533</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Especially if they're brothers, and they end up in the same prison ;-)</p></blockquote><p>Now, now, we promised Emma we wouldn't go there again.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:35:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94531#post94531</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94531#post94531</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Graeme, righto then substitute in manslaughter in place of aggravated assault in my point. 2 acts of pedophilia, then manslaughter, doesn't really hint at a pattern, where it may for 3 consecutive manslaughters, particularly if they're done in very similar ways.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:34:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94526#post94526</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94526#post94526</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Ben &ndash; see my comment above &ndash; aggravated assault has been removed from the list of specified offences.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:04:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94525#post94525</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94525#post94525</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It won't reduce crime.<br />It will restrict judges ability to apply experience and knowledge to sentencing.</p><p>But most impotantly it will get politicians in the news &ndash; sigh.</p></blockquote><p>You could say that Laura Norder keeps fixing the match.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:04:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94524#post94524</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94524#post94524</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>So Graeme, with the new list of included offences, what's the lowest possible "usual" sentence for those? You mentioned three years in your original entry, does this still hold under the new offences list?</p></blockquote><p>No it does not.</p><p>All the three year offences and five year offences which were listed…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:00:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94521#post94521</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94521#post94521</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>hmmm</p><p>Rugby League: 6th tackle handover<br />Softball/baseball: 3 strikes<br />Rugby: ?<br />Basketball: 3 seconds in the key<br />Cricket: 2nd bouncers in an over<br />Actually that is interesting because what if your 3 strikes are each 20 years apart? Surely after enough time being good your strikes should be removed.<br />Tennis:…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:51:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94515#post94515</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94515#post94515</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Look, do you want to have a bunch of killers and pervs on the loose or not? You smug intellectuals won't be smiling when your children are BRUTALLY SLAIN (photos of the scene on p3).</p></blockquote><p>Stephen, you may enjoy the column I just put up.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:30:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94514#post94514</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94514#post94514</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>you could still end up imprisoned for life for a (icky and indicative of some really weird psychological shit) consensual sex act between adults. In what way does this help society? Really?</p></blockquote><p>Especially if they're brothers, and they end up in the same prison ;-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:21:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94511#post94511</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94511#post94511</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Look, do you want to have a bunch of killers and pervs on the loose or not? You smug intellectuals won't be smiling when your children are BRUTALLY SLAIN (photos of the scene on p3).
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:09:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94510#post94510</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94510#post94510</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>That would still be my major gripe &ndash; two relatively serious offences, then you commit a more minor offence with maximum sentence of three years and you're off for 25? Clearly you're a nasty bugger but that still seems mainfestly unjust.</p></blockquote><p>That's why I found the inclusion of some of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:03:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94508#post94508</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94508#post94508</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						correction: in "with respect to the particular crimes they are accused of", substitute "accused" for "found guilty".
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:58:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94507#post94507</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94507#post94507</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I think it's meant as a mnemonic for criminals. Because, you know how stupid they all are, and aren't capable of remembering the years that they may have spent in prison.</p><p>Why a mnemonic should find its way into law, I don't know. Perhaps it's not the criminals that need…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:56:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Litterick</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94506#post94506</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94506#post94506</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Call me old fashioned if you like. but I think it is up to the judge to decide the appropriate punishment, within the parameters decided by the Crimes Act. I find it objectionable for Government to demand that a judge sentence someone to life imprisonment because that someone has previous…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:56:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94504#post94504</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94504#post94504</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'd like that considered more than the magic number 3, and glib saying "three strikes and you're out [in surely?]".</p></blockquote><p>It's too hard to get "Appropriately weighted prison sentences through judges empowered to analyse and consider the contexual issues" on to a billboard though.  Especially when that huge picture of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:42:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94502#post94502</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94502#post94502</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>So what is the logic in using the magic three number, aside from the baseball metaphor? Was there analysis done as to the average number of serious crimes/other committed? Perhaps we should consider who the target of this law is, the average numbers of crimes they commit etc, then determine…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:38:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94500#post94500</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94500#post94500</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>So Graeme, with the new list of included offences, what's the lowest possible "usual" sentence for those?  You mentioned three years in your original entry, does this still hold under the new offences list?<br />That would still be my major gripe &ndash; two relatively serious offences, then you commit a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:32:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94498#post94498</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94498#post94498</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I stand corrected. I was confused by the use of urgency to put it through the first reading, a practice which I'm not familiar with. Why you'd do it if there was no hurry in the other stages was a mystery until now. So I made the wrong assumption that…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:20:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94492#post94492</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94492#post94492</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Rammed through, George?</p><p>I realise it was debated yesterday instead of waiting until Tuesday, but it was sent to select committee.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:08:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94482#post94482</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94482#post94482</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The lack of due process here is appalling. Laws in New Zealand are made by Parliament, and thus are tabled, read, and sent for submissions and review. For good reason.</p><p>There will be problems with this law; there always are when non-administrative legislation is rammed through. They may be flaws…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:36:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94481#post94481</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94481#post94481</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I find this kind of bizarre. Surely people guilty of these are more in need of intensive psychiatric treatment than 25 years in prison? Especially given that all the various permutations of statutory rape are included separately.</p></blockquote><p>They'll only get the 25 years if they have two separate convictions for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:27:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94479#post94479</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94479#post94479</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>* incest</p><ul><li>compelling indecent act with animal</li></ul><p>I find this kind of bizarre. Surely people guilty of these are more in need of intensive psychiatric treatment than 25 years in prison? Especially given that all the various permutations of statutory rape are included separately.</p></blockquote><p>Yeah, unsurprisingly I'm wary that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:23:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94478#post94478</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94478#post94478</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Except that I assume the power of a judge to order a non-custodial sentence for the third offence would be removed by the Bill &ndash; is this correct?</p></blockquote><p>For the third strike, yes. For the third offence, probably not.</p><p>The power of a judge to order a non-custodial sentence on…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:21:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94477#post94477</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94477#post94477</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Bruce Emery's manslaughter of Pihema Cameron would have been serious enough to count as a strike.</p></blockquote><p>Edit function needed :-)</p><p><em>Bruce Emery's manslaughter of Pihema Cameron would <strong>NOT</strong> have been serious enough to count as a strike.</em></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:15:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ScottY</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94475#post94475</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94475#post94475</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Yes. More people in prison, but not more people thrown in prison.</p></blockquote><p>Except that I assume the power of a judge to order a non-custodial sentence for the third offence would be removed by the Bill &ndash; is this correct? </p><p>In which case possibly more people thrown in prison. Admittedly,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:13:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94474#post94474</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94474#post94474</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Bruce Emery's manslaughter of Pihema Cameron would have been serious enough to count as a strike.</p></blockquote><p>I thought he was sentenced to less then five years?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:11:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94473#post94473</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-three-strikes-w-updates/?p=94473#post94473</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>And what else has changed?</em> </p><p>2. This isn't just the SST's/ACT's three strikes law with a few changes, it's really National's two strikes sentencing law with additional consequences for a third strike added in.</p><p>It is worth noting that the Attorney-General's report indicates only that the aspects of the bill…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:08:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
