<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Legal Beagle: The Government&#039;s Proposed Decriminalisation of Racist Hate Speech</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-the-governments-proposed-decriminalisation/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Tim McKenzie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-the-governments-proposed-decriminalisation/?p=384692#post384692</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-the-governments-proposed-decriminalisation/?p=384692#post384692</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						If someone publicly said that a particular New Zealander of Ruritanian descent should "go back to Ruritania", in a context where the plain meaning was that the Ruritanian–New Zealander was unwelcome here, could that be an offence, either under the current law, or the proposed changes?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2021 19:22:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>EE</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-the-governments-proposed-decriminalisation/?p=384691#post384691</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-the-governments-proposed-decriminalisation/?p=384691#post384691</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks for outlining this issue with such clarity.</p><p>The modifications proposed are in response to the Mosque shootings, but, ironically, wouldn't there be a case to prosecute anyone who published some Islamic religious texts, I'm thinking specifically of what they say about homosexuals.<br />See: <a href="https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Qur%27an,_Hadith_and_Scholars:Homosexuality" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Qur%27an,_Hadith_and_Scholars:Homosexuality</a></p><p>They would seem to contravene…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2021 16:11:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nick Russell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-the-governments-proposed-decriminalisation/?p=384690#post384690</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-the-governments-proposed-decriminalisation/?p=384690#post384690</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It seems a bit of a stretch to argue that the proposed reform will somehow narrow the scope of prohibited speech. If you can draw a distinction between speech which is offensive enough to "excite hostility" but is not offensive enough to "stir up hatred", then hats off to you.…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2021 15:34:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-the-governments-proposed-decriminalisation/?p=384689#post384689</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-the-governments-proposed-decriminalisation/?p=384689#post384689</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2021 15:34:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
