Public Address | Cafe | Legal Beagle: The Contempt of Court Bill

PAUL STICHBURY

Tue, 31 Jul 2018 02:38:00 +1200

Let me be crystal clear
.
The link to the website which was deleted is entirely factual with extensive links to correspondence and government documents which provide incontrovertible proof of judicial and executive fraud
.
It is not defamatory but extremely embarrassing to the numerous participants in the Turitea wind…

Sacha

Mon, 30 Jul 2018 08:28:38 +1200

It is the publisher not the public who can be prosecuted. That's why the decision is Russell's, not ours. Please respect that.

PAUL STICHBURY

Sun, 29 Jul 2018 11:12:10 +1200

Hi Russell, no offence taken. I realise a 100-ton hot potato landed on your desk. However, on balance, it would have been better to have left the link and let the public decide if it was a "bit" wild or defamatory. A "bit" defamatory is like being a bit dead.…

Russell Brown

Sat, 28 Jul 2018 16:53:49 +1200

Hi Paul. I normally don't mind people linking to their own sites, but that looks a bit wild and defamatory sorry.

PAUL STICHBURY

Sat, 28 Jul 2018 01:32:30 +1200

When allegations are made about a judge which are not true the judge in question has recourse to current law. What is not addressed is when an accusation be it by Twitter or some other venue on the internet is true. What recourse does the citizen in possession of damning…

Moz

Tue, 19 Jun 2018 09:19:50 +1200

I find your comments to the effect that "if you bill drafting geniuses can't find it..." blackly amusing because of the tremendous volume of deliberately opaque material covered by the phrase "ignorance of the law is no excuse". Legislation is bad enough, but case law? Ignorance is guaranteed whether that's…

Rochelle Wilson

Sun, 17 Jun 2018 10:51:10 +1200

Another excellent post Graeme. Thank you.

Public Address

Sun, 17 Jun 2018 10:51:10 +1200

Discussion from blog post.