<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Legal Beagle: Search and Surveillance: an occasional series</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-search-and-surveillance-an-occasional/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-search-and-surveillance-an-occasional/?p=253610#post253610</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-search-and-surveillance-an-occasional/?p=253610#post253610</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Eep! Missed that. Still, the point is not so much to be excluded from search as removing surveillance footage from easy access for destruction. So putting it on an Internet server would be a good idea, depending on how paranoid I'm feeling.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 13:34:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jordan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-search-and-surveillance-an-occasional/?p=253540#post253540</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-search-and-surveillance-an-occasional/?p=253540#post253540</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I think I’ll be looking seriously at wireless video surveillance at multiple points inside my house for just this situation, streaming directly to a server housed nearby but not on the property.</q></p><p>Apologies if Graeme was saving this for a later post, but the Act also allows warrants to be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:53:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-search-and-surveillance-an-occasional/?p=253156#post253156</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-search-and-surveillance-an-occasional/?p=253156#post253156</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Doing it if you're an indymedia journalist being raided by a terror squad at 6am seems unwise.</q></p><p>I think I'll be looking seriously at wireless video surveillance at multiple points inside my house for just this situation, streaming directly to a server housed nearby but not on the property. Not…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:02:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BDB</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-search-and-surveillance-an-occasional/?p=253153#post253153</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-search-and-surveillance-an-occasional/?p=253153#post253153</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I would like to see your focus on the alleged journalist rights move to the S&amp;S law  itself.</p><p>Surely you can see the problems and the conflicts with existing laws and how about the repeal on the privacy act before Collins "reputation" was "exposed" . <br />Do you like the idea of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:36:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-search-and-surveillance-an-occasional/?p=253148#post253148</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-search-and-surveillance-an-occasional/?p=253148#post253148</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>That's because it seems like a definitive argument. I'm not a lawyer, so it's a bit above my head. And I'm not AFAIK covered by the journalism exemption anyway, so it doesn't affect me (the detail isn't important, I can't afford a lawyer to make the argument).</p><p>It does seem…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:32:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-search-and-surveillance-an-occasional/?p=253086#post253086</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-search-and-surveillance-an-occasional/?p=253086#post253086</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>About an hour. I'm reasonably happy with that. But now work out how long it would take to do this over all the other aspects of the bill (about which I'm less certain about the current law) :-)</p><p>Edit: least popular thread ever :-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:59:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-search-and-surveillance-an-occasional/?p=253085#post253085</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-search-and-surveillance-an-occasional/?p=253085#post253085</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:59:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
