<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Legal Beagle: On Burglary, or: Dropping the Ball</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=283849#post283849</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=283849#post283849</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						A partial result &ndash; the <a href="http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/PB/SC/Documents/Reports/1/2/2/50DBSCH_SCR5818_1-Criminal-Procedure-Legislation-Bill-74-2.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">select committee has recommended</a> that the bit of the law that would allow the executive to amend references to "crime" in statutes by regulation should be removed. If there are any such references remaining, it will be up to Parliament to make the amendments itself.…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 15:21:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281717#post281717</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281717#post281717</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Or, possibly, because the laws on rape & armed robbery are quite old, and therefore have comparatively low maximum sentences, whereas the laws on hacking are new and therefore have quite high maximum sentences.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 16:18:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281701#post281701</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281701#post281701</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Overseas, hackers are already threatened with longer sentences than rapists and armed robbers. I sometimes wonder if it's because rape and robbery barely affect the Inner Party/One Percenters, where hacking is one of the few things that genuinely make them brown their pants.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 22:28:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281686#post281686</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281686#post281686</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I’ve got another curly one for you Graeme.</p><p>About 2 months ago I caught the neighbours kids throwing fruit from a tree on their property at my house and a neighbours house.</p><p>Does a thrown object that crosses your property boundary, causing damage, equal a held crowbar that crosses a…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 03:28:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Yamis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281684#post281684</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281684#post281684</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Your front lawn isn't an enclosed yard, so no.<br />Enclosed yards are usually places like building sites, or semi-industrial places that get locked at the end of the day, if you can just stroll up a driveway, I don't believe it counts.</q></p><p>I've got another curly one for you Graeme.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 00:21:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Yamis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281683#post281683</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281683#post281683</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>What if there is a gate at the end of the drive? Should domestic properties close their gate and hang a sign saying "closed for soliciting, trespassers will be prosecuted for burglary".  Quite tempting :)</p><p>To get to our front door somebody has to walk up our drive, go up…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 00:14:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281680#post281680</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281680#post281680</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But that could now be classed as burglary?</q></p><p>Your front lawn isn't an enclosed yard, so no.</p><p>Enclosed yards are usually places like building sites, or semi-industrial places that get locked at the end of the day, if you can just stroll up a driveway, I don't believe it counts.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 21:42:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281679#post281679</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281679#post281679</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What's the deal with people knocking on your front door </q></p><p>Implied license, I think.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 20:02:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Yamis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281678#post281678</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281678#post281678</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>What's the deal with people knocking on your front door to raise money for charity, flog some home ventilation system, or borrow some sugar? They've all clearly entered your property without permission.</p><p>I'm not quite getting the burglary vs trespass difference.</p><p>Could somebody freedom camping on the edge of somebody's…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 19:50:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281675#post281675</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281675#post281675</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Trespassing and stealing a swim, and indecent exposure! Death's too good for him!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 17:14:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Will de Cleene</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281672#post281672</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281672#post281672</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Trespass to what? A field, or someone’s front lawn are unlikely to count as an enclosed yard.</q></p><p>But jumping over someone's fence to skinny-dip in their pool would count as an enclosed yard.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:30:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jarno van der Linden</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281670#post281670</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281670#post281670</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I would add that everyone reading this has a tool on their computer (a web browser) that can provide unauthorized access to a website</q></p><p>But probably most of us don't possess those tools because we intend to commit an offence with it. I would hope that any possession charge would…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 14:28:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281667#post281667</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281667#post281667</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Can you explain what "lawful" means? I'd often wondered...</p><p>Is a lawful purpose anything not a crime (or offence?). Is there a reverse onus? Does there need to be a specific purpose that is lawful?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 13:59:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nick Kearney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281665#post281665</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281665#post281665</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Parliament should be very wary about ever giving the government the power to amend primary legislation, but that power should never include the power to expand the scope of criminal offences. And it certainly shouldn’t be doing it in a non-controversial law reform bill.</q></p><p>Yes.  And the current Parliament/Government has…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 13:50:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281656#post281656</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281656#post281656</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						That raises an interesting question. If someone commits the offence of being unlawfully on premises, and they have the intention of being unlawfully on premises, are they (soon to be) committing a burglary?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:27:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281654#post281654</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281654#post281654</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Is trespass counted as burglary now? </q></p><p>Trespass to what? A field, or someone’s front lawn are unlikely to count as an enclosed yard.</p><p>But the fact that trespass is an imprisonable offence shows how much the crime of burglary will expand under this change.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:14:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Will de Cleene</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281653#post281653</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281653#post281653</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Is trespass counted as burglary now? Going by the examples you've given, I presume going behind the school bike sheds at night to smoke a spliff is now burglary too.</p><p>Has the law just grown another ass?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:01:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281649#post281649</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281649#post281649</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I think, from memory, that Keith Ng demonstrated the power of Word at the MSD. I would add that everyone reading this has a tool on their computer (a web browser) that can provide unauthorized access to a website if that websites security is effectively non-existent.<br />I am thinking of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:48:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tim McKenzie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281641#post281641</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281641#post281641</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>this is the type of unintended consequence I try to pick up when I’m writing a submission on a bill, and I dropped the ball.</q><br />Don't be too down on yourself.  I'm impressed by how many problems you do notice, and no single person should be expected (or expect themselves)…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:42:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281640#post281640</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281640#post281640</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>My concern is that BORA got changed so quietly.</q></p><p>It wasn’t that quiet. Indeed, it altered during the passage of the bill due to public disquiet.</p><p>The current rule is that a defendant can ask for a jury if the maximum penalty is more than three months’ imprisonment.</p><p>As introduced,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:31:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281638#post281638</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281638#post281638</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Did we ever have midemeanours and felonies in NZ?</q></p><p>Pretty much. Crimes/Indictable offences are basically felonies. Lesser offences (now called summary offences, but I don’t think they always were), are basically misdemeanors.</p><p>The basic distinction in New Zealand is that crimes are tried by a judge and jury, and summary…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:34:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281637#post281637</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281637#post281637</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Did we ever have midemeanours and felonies in NZ?</p><p>My concern is that BORA got changed so quietly. Isn't it meant to be core, fundamental, rights, not something that can be tweaked at will? I know it's neither entrenched or binding, but if it's amendable late on a Friday while…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:20:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281636#post281636</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281636#post281636</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Wow, this is pretty serious stuff, to have slipped under the radar.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:19:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281635#post281635</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281635#post281635</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>More detail of the Supreme Court case please – talk about throwing out a teaser!</q></p><p><em>Siemer v Solicitor-General</em>. I was appearing for Mr Siemer as junior, but got around half-an-hour on my feet when it was argued for the second time last week.</p><p>We had a day’s hearing late last…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:04:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281634#post281634</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281634#post281634</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Ah I see what they did there &ndash; forget the 3 strikes laws &ndash; own a copy of windows, think about downloading a song &ndash; go to jail for 2 years
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:52:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281633#post281633</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281633#post281633</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> there are many programmes that are capable of being used to commit a crime. There must be a co-existent intention to commit a crime which may be proven by direct evidence or inference.</q></p><p>That's true. But the type of crime that has to be proved by that evidence would change…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:44:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Harvey</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281632#post281632</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281632#post281632</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						On the computer crime thing &ndash; sure, there are many programmes that are capable of being used to commit a crime. There must be a co-existent intention to commit a crime which may be proven by direct evidence or inference. But then lots of stuff can be used for nasty…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:32:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281630#post281630</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-on-burglary-or-dropping-the/?p=281630#post281630</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:18:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
