<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Legal Beagle: Not burglary?</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=303842#post303842</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=303842#post303842</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The type of people that own holiday homes don’t take well to low level crimes and minor inconveniences not being investigated when they are the victim</q></p><p>I suspect the police have paid a bit more attention to this case because the victim is a prominent NZer.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2013 13:08:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gregor Ronald</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302599#post302599</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302599#post302599</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I used to live in a holiday town in Otago, and these holiday-home break-ins by local kids came in cycles. (I know this lot didn't go inside, but anyway...) Usually they got caught by the cops, the school became involved, and the kids were publicly shamed at a school assembly.…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 13:53:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302580#post302580</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302580#post302580</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yes, that's what I meant: 'still a bit of a gap from there to being able to use it in court [as falling within a definition of 'found']'.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 10:34:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302578#post302578</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302578#post302578</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Still a bit of a gap from there to being able to use it in court, but.</q></p><p>No. This could easily be used in a prosecution in respect of a prosecution for any charge these boys might face. I'm just suggested that it wouldn't provide evidence that they were "found"…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 10:17:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302577#post302577</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302577#post302577</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The commentary I looked up gave no mention of video</q></p><p>The *legal* commentary I looked up to find out what case law says "found" means gave no mention of whether being caught on security cameras counted as being found. My guess, based on other cases described, is that it would…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 10:15:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302573#post302573</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302573#post302573</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Still a bit of a gap from there to being able to use it in court, but.</p><p>Thanks for the reply, Graeme.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 09:42:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302568#post302568</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302568#post302568</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The commentary I looked up gave no mention of video</q><br />From the <em>Herald</em><br /><q>Security cameras which cover the property were reviewed.<br />Sergeant Steve Watt, of Queenstown, said yesterday 11 youths from Queenstown's sole secondary school had been identified from the video footage and social media where one of the alleged…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 07:46:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302567#post302567</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302567#post302567</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I would like to know your personal and legal opinion of pet killers?</p><p>I have been involved in a situation ongoing now for me for 3 months. After I was asked to look after a neighbours cats while they were away, and the cats suddenly disappeared. I found one of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 07:36:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302565#post302565</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302565#post302565</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Graeme, what are the legal boundaries of ‘found’? Your post implies that they have to be physically caught in the act on the property. If there was camera phone footage, CCTV, or similar available that clearly showed they’d been there, would that fall inside or outside the definition?</q></p><p>The commentary…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 07:26:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302562#post302562</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302562#post302562</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The type of people that own holiday homes don’t take well to low level crimes and minor inconveniences not being investigated when they are the victim</q><br />Probably of no real consequence when it comes to finer points of law, but a surprising (to me) number of Queenstown 'homes' appear to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 23:24:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302561#post302561</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302561#post302561</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>An element of that offence is that you have to be “found” on the property, and it appears these students weren’t</q></p><p>Graeme, what are the legal boundaries of 'found'?  Your post implies that they have to be physically caught in the act on the property.  If there was camera phone…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 23:01:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tim Darlington</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302555#post302555</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302555#post302555</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						This type of person who doesn't and isn't ever likely to own a holiday home doesn't like low-level crimes not being investigated when I'm the victim either.  The number of people who really don't mind a bunch of pissed wankers trashing their place would not be a large one, I…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 20:36:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302554#post302554</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302554#post302554</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It's probably more to do with them having footage, which does mean it's possible to make some progress.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 20:35:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bbrooks</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302551#post302551</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302551#post302551</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The type of people that own holiday homes don't take well to low level crimes and minor inconveniences not being investigated when they are the victim
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 18:34:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302545#post302545</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302545#post302545</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It's not OK to do what these kids did, but it's way low down on the list of crimes. Sounds like about half an hour's work to clean up, comparable to graffiti, less serious than breaking a window. I'm surprised the police bothered to look into it.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 13:47:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302543#post302543</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302543#post302543</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What’s an “enclosed yard”? You suggested previously it was mostly an industrial premise or building site, rather than a residential garden?</q></p><p>Those are common examples where the offence is used, Adams on Criminal Law notes:</p><p><q>In order to be “enclosed” it is not essential that the area be completely surrounded…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 13:36:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302541#post302541</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302541#post302541</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						What's an "enclosed yard"? You suggested previously it was mostly an industrial premise or building site, rather than a residential garden?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 12:57:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ross Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302538#post302538</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302538#post302538</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Is "intent" to break the bottle/glass thingy a magic word? If you "accidentally" drop it then does that take the intent away?</p><p>Hmm...does "placing" an empty bottle on the ground &ndash; without breaking it &ndash; in a public place take away the intent?</p><p>Forget it. Previous section has "deposit" in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 12:01:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302536#post302536</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302536#post302536</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						You're assuming this was an unintended consequence.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 11:10:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302535#post302535</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-not-burglary/?p=302535#post302535</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 11:10:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
