<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Legal Beagle: Necessity: or the Sky is Falling</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-necessity-or-the-sky-is-falling/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-necessity-or-the-sky-is-falling/?p=344535#post344535</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-necessity-or-the-sky-is-falling/?p=344535#post344535</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Graeme, you say that you opined but I think in fact that you averred.</q></p><p>Capt. W. E. John disagrees.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 07:42:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stuart Hoar</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-necessity-or-the-sky-is-falling/?p=344472#post344472</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-necessity-or-the-sky-is-falling/?p=344472#post344472</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Graeme, you say that you opined but I think in fact that you averred.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 15:56:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-necessity-or-the-sky-is-falling/?p=344443#post344443</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-necessity-or-the-sky-is-falling/?p=344443#post344443</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Come to that, isn't this Act fairly firmly in conflict with <a href="http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1990/0109/latest/DLM225528.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">S26 (1)</a> of NZBORA? And I don't see an AG report in Hansard as required by <a href="http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1990/0109/latest/DLM225503.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">S7</a> of that Act?</p><p>I know the <strong>Bill of Strictly Optional and Tiresome Rights General Guidelines Only</strong> allows parliament to ignore any of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:34:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-necessity-or-the-sky-is-falling/?p=344441#post344441</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-necessity-or-the-sky-is-falling/?p=344441#post344441</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I'd by right in thinking that this is <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_post_facto_law" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">ex-post-facto law</a> and contrary to e.g. the ECHR? Or does the fact that it's an infringement rather than a crime put it outside this requirement?</p><p>(I believe that e.g. English law doesn't have infringements. Even the most minor motoring offences are criminal,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:27:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-necessity-or-the-sky-is-falling/?p=344433#post344433</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-necessity-or-the-sky-is-falling/?p=344433#post344433</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I’m going to need legal advice about what that means :-)</q></p><p>There are time limits on how quickly you can sue someone, and how quickly you can challenge a ticket or appeal a conviction. Many of the people who would have been able to challenge their tickets (by eg saying…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 12:55:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-necessity-or-the-sky-is-falling/?p=344427#post344427</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-necessity-or-the-sky-is-falling/?p=344427#post344427</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>If they hadn’t changed the law retrospectively, drivers who had lost there licences, due to accumulating demerit points – might have started asking to have there demerit points credited. And there might have been requests for compensation for the humiliation of not being able to drive for the six mounths.</q>…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 12:40:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Patrick Xavier</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-necessity-or-the-sky-is-falling/?p=344398#post344398</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-necessity-or-the-sky-is-falling/?p=344398#post344398</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The feared consequences that had necessitated the passing of retrospective validating legislation had in fact occurred, because the validating legislation itself hadn’t done enough to fix the problem.</q></p><p>Then there's <em>AG v Spencer</em>, referred to <a href="http://www.chapmantripp.com/publications/Pages/The-prince,-the-mother,-and-the-principle-of-legality.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 11:34:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Geddis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-necessity-or-the-sky-is-falling/?p=344386#post344386</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-necessity-or-the-sky-is-falling/?p=344386#post344386</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>That’s why all vehicles are equipped with a large glass thing in front of the driver, so one can see what the road does and control the vehicle appropriately.</q></p><p>Of course, on that approach we don’t need set speed limits anywhere … just a general rule to “drive safely” –…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 10:08:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-necessity-or-the-sky-is-falling/?p=344385#post344385</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-necessity-or-the-sky-is-falling/?p=344385#post344385</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>roads collar...</strong><br /><q>That’s why all vehicles are equipped with a large glass thing in front of the driver, so one can see what the road does and control the vehicle appropriately</q><br />Hmm &ndash; there's always that loose nut behind the wheel to factor in...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 09:12:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Marcelo Rodriguez Ferrere</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-necessity-or-the-sky-is-falling/?p=344384#post344384</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-necessity-or-the-sky-is-falling/?p=344384#post344384</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So I'm not convinced this was necessary.</q></p><p>But that's not the test for urgency, is it? Otherwise the sky would be falling on a worryingly consistent basis, since it's increasingly being used as a default option  (as detailed in the Urgency Project a few years back <a href="http://www.parliament.nz/resource/en-nz/49SCSO_EVI_00DBSCH_INQ_10324_1_A177554/868f643a1250838082708e04bba6543e9c7e491a" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>). But despite all…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 09:10:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-necessity-or-the-sky-is-falling/?p=344382#post344382</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-necessity-or-the-sky-is-falling/?p=344382#post344382</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>anyone who is led to believe by signs that they can drive it at 100 km/h will probably run off the road pretty quickly</q></p><p>That's why all vehicles are equipped with a large glass thing in front of the driver, so one can see what the road does and control…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 08:57:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Geddis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-necessity-or-the-sky-is-falling/?p=344381#post344381</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-necessity-or-the-sky-is-falling/?p=344381#post344381</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>I reckon very few people would actually have appealed five- or ten-year-old speeding fines (it was a fair cop, even if the posted limits had expired), but the Minister of Transport has said this wasn’t about revenue, but safety. Well, even if there aren’t speed limits, dangerous driving would still…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 08:12:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>SteveH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-necessity-or-the-sky-is-falling/?p=344377#post344377</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-necessity-or-the-sky-is-falling/?p=344377#post344377</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I really don't understand the "safety" justification for making law change retrospective. How exactly does invalidating old tickets make the anything less safe? To whatever degree speeding is dangerous, it's dangerous whether or not the speeder is caught and fined, surely?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 23:39:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-necessity-or-the-sky-is-falling/?p=344376#post344376</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-necessity-or-the-sky-is-falling/?p=344376#post344376</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 23:39:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
