<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Legal Beagle: MMP Review #3: The Submission</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Venetia King</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=256002#post256002</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=256002#post256002</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Just saw the MMP review site has the lists of submitters for the Wellington hearings &ndash; Graeme's been given a half hour timeslot (almost all the others only have 15 minutes). Hope it's enough :)  </p><p>I would've quite liked to observe the process but will be on an aircraft at…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 23:02:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=255385#post255385</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=255385#post255385</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:49:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tim Robinson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=255376#post255376</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=255376#post255376</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And of course, if you disagree &ndash; please submit also. Your supporting reasoning will help better make the case for a position that may not be well argued at present.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:31:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tim Robinson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=255375#post255375</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=255375#post255375</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>If you're reading this thread, and thinking 'mm. Graeme has some good points, and has expressed them more eloquently than I could, so I don't need to submit.' please please reconsider, and add your voice.</p><p>I had not intended to submit until I heard, with one ear, David Farrar on…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:13:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Venetia King</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=255347#post255347</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=255347#post255347</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Graeme, I very much appreciate the work you have done here. I'm not sure I would've bothered to submit to the review without the benefit of your research and opinions. Thank you for helping me take my democratic rights and responsibilities more seriously!</p><p>Quoting from my "5 minute submission" (took…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 08:28:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Tinkler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=255158#post255158</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=255158#post255158</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I meant to include a mention of the two populations (the NZ population which is used to apportion electorate seats (people repressented of all ages) and the voting population that is allocate seats)  in my submission. However I missed it out. Really no idea why as I do rant on…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:50:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=255112#post255112</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=255112#post255112</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Different uses of the word "represent".</p><p>Active "Represent" all NZers, in the sense of working for them all. But they are representative of those who voted for them.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:08:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tim McKenzie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=255102#post255102</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=255102#post255102</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>This significantly strengthens the imperative to ensure that the voices of as many voters as possible are represented in the House of Representatives.</q><br /><q>Members of Parliament represent all New Zealanders, not just those of voting age</q><br />Which is it?  Do MPs represent all New Zealanders, or only the ones who…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:48:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=255076#post255076</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=255076#post255076</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I think she (and the other Green electorate candidates) would like to be electorate MPs, but would prefer that if they don't get elected, Labour rather than National take the seat.</p><p>It's a bit of a FPP hangover though. It shouldn't actually matter if National win electorates &ndash; if the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:13:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=255072#post255072</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=255072#post255072</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Perhaps you’re bemoaning the few candidates who openly discourage electorate votes for themselves such as Gareth Hughes and Paul Goldsmith.</q></p><p>I mostly was. I don't think Metiria Turei really wants to be an electorate MP in Dunedin either, but I acknowledge I could be wrong.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:44:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Myles Thomas</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=255067#post255067</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=255067#post255067</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						A note on my "tosh". Perhaps you're bemoaning the few candidates who openly discourage electorate votes for themselves such as Gareth Hughes and Paul Goldsmith. Yet this incongruity is easily fixed by changing the  One seat threshold rather than distortions created by disallowing dual candidacy (which you point out elsewhere).
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 23:12:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Myles Thomas</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=255063#post255063</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=255063#post255063</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I also disagree with your assumption tht voters vote for candidate they prefer at bi-elections or when looking at party lists. I believe that the vast majority of voters care little for the personality of their electorate candidate, or study party lists for names they like or dislike. Sadly I…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 22:42:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Myles Thomas</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=255062#post255062</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=255062#post255062</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Re: 42 "Lots of people stand in an electorate knowing that they won’t win, but putting one’s name forward for election when you don’t even want to win seems almost dishonest, and I’m not sure we should be writing our electoral laws to benefit those who wish to run in…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 22:24:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jake Pollock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=254902#post254902</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=254902#post254902</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>This is convincing.</p><p>I think you could also connect the open list issue with the threshold issue i.e. voters who don't like the way lists are constructed by a party will be better able to vote for other parties if the threshold is lowered or removed. As it stands that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 02:13:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=254901#post254901</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=254901#post254901</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Impressive content aside, some proofreading of language is still needed</q></p><p>I very much imagined that would be the case, but I was very very tired by the time I finished :-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 23:15:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=254897#post254897</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=254897#post254897</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Impressive content aside, some proofreading of language is still needed, e.g.:<br />3. “[…] a minimum that its is substantially lowered” –> “a minimum that is substantially lowered”;<br />5. “This significantly strengthens makes the imperative […]” –> “This significantly strengthens the imperative”;<br />19. “Iam” –> “I am”;<br />26. “we’ve had 5%…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 21:54:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Raymond A Francis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=254860#post254860</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=254860#post254860</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I think you have covered everything that I feel is important very well<br />Especially like points 55 and 87</p><p>Now it will be interesting to see if the Turkeys will vote for Christmas or at least if self interest compared with true democracy will prevail</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 13:49:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=254859#post254859</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=254859#post254859</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Currently the Bundestag has its largest parties as the CDU at  27% and the SPD at 23%. All smaller than  the NSDAP in all of the elections of 1932-3. I cant see how a threshold would have changed anything in 1933 or as I have shown give a more stable…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 13:47:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=254854#post254854</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=254854#post254854</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Hard to see why the reference to the Nazi party was necessary.</q></p><p>Because that's a common example used by those who favour high thresholds.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 13:03:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=254853#post254853</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=254853#post254853</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Hard to see why the reference to the Nazi party was necessary.The Weimar Republic introduced proportional representation in Germany , not the Allied occupation. <br />The National Socialist Freedom Party, on its first attempt  in the first election of 1924, won 6.5% and 32 MPs. And while they didnt get over…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 12:47:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=254851#post254851</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=254851#post254851</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Not even 7000 words. I have failed :-)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 11:16:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=254850#post254850</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-mmp-review-3-the-submission/?p=254850#post254850</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 11:16:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
