<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Legal Beagle: Legislate in haste...</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-legislate-in-haste/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-legislate-in-haste/?p=225844#post225844</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-legislate-in-haste/?p=225844#post225844</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						This country's first world status is not evenly distributed, is all.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:43:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graham Dunster</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-legislate-in-haste/?p=225843#post225843</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-legislate-in-haste/?p=225843#post225843</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Well, we're not first world in so many things now and it's untrue to say that we're third world, so where else does this leave us? Two and a half?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:17:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-legislate-in-haste/?p=225750#post225750</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-legislate-in-haste/?p=225750#post225750</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>We seem to be drawn inexorably to a second world status.</q></p><p>We're being an advanced communist state?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 13:15:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graham Dunster</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-legislate-in-haste/?p=225740#post225740</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-legislate-in-haste/?p=225740#post225740</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						We seem to be drawn inexorably to a second world status.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:54:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-legislate-in-haste/?p=225694#post225694</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-legislate-in-haste/?p=225694#post225694</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>A select committee would also have been an opportunity for policy to be debated &ndash; is a five-yearly census of every household still the best way to gather information in the 21st century?</q></p><p>That may be a good discussion to have, but I don't believe this bill is the place…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:02:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-legislate-in-haste/?p=225660#post225660</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-legislate-in-haste/?p=225660#post225660</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>an opportunity for policy to be debated</q></p><p>I'm not sure the current government believes in that, on principle.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 12:33:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Phil Lyth</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-legislate-in-haste/?p=225653#post225653</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-legislate-in-haste/?p=225653#post225653</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>A select committee would also have been an opportunity for policy to be debated &ndash; is a five-yearly census of every household still the best way to gather information in the 21st century?</p><p>One op-ed writer earlier this year  (and I haven't been able to find the piece) suggested that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 09:45:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Phil Lyth</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-legislate-in-haste/?p=225649#post225649</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-legislate-in-haste/?p=225649#post225649</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I too was wondering why National sat on its hands for so long.  Took three months until 27 May to announce the next census in 2013, and then another 10 weeks to introduce the bill.</p><p>There was plenty of time for a short select committee process.</p><p>The judicial review section…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 08:50:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-legislate-in-haste/?p=225618#post225618</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-legislate-in-haste/?p=225618#post225618</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>In fact, why don't we have a proper process of drafting some robust legislation that can kick in when disaster strikes, rather than legislating in panic at the time?</q></p><p>Some would say that it's the three-year term of Parliament :-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 13:44:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-legislate-in-haste/?p=225615#post225615</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-legislate-in-haste/?p=225615#post225615</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Why don't they put a force majeure clause into the Statistics Act that lets any census be deferred in the event of a natural disaster that reasonably prevents it being conducted?</p><p>Then we'd have one less thing to worry about when the Big One takes out Wellington (or the Taupo…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 13:35:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-legislate-in-haste/?p=225580#post225580</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-legislate-in-haste/?p=225580#post225580</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I should add my thanks to <a href="http://blog.labour.org.nz/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Trevor Mallard</a>.</p><p>When I realised the bill was to be debated under urgency, I posted my concern on his Facebook wall. He said he’d look into it and later stated during the debate in the House that he had received confirmation from the Minister…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 18:14:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-legislate-in-haste/?p=225579#post225579</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-legislate-in-haste/?p=225579#post225579</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 18:14:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
