<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Legal Beagle: Kim Dotcom: Questions and Answers</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271341#post271341</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271341#post271341</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Those are not the dots that I would be looking at &ndash; a more dometic scenario would seems more relevant having regard to the steaming mound of local implausible untruth that surrounds every turn of the Kim Dot Com Saga..</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56_S0WeTkzs" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56_S0WeTkzs</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 15:22:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ross Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271337#post271337</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271337#post271337</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Joining the Dots. </p><p>Lets film the Hobbit in NZ.<br />Dot com moves to NZ<br />What? <br />Hey Peter. See if you can get the PM to sort out a meeting.<br />Mr PM. along with Hobitt, we want to get that megaupload crowd. What with your subsidy we still can't make a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 12:57:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271325#post271325</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271325#post271325</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Living in real world NZ I ask, “Yeah, on Planet Key is everyone, including the contrarians, stoned?”</q></p><p>Knowing Planet Key, wouldn't they be more coked-up than stoned? Chances are Planet Key thinks weed is for filthy hippies.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 02:05:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271320#post271320</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271320#post271320</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The answer.</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZSUb5wFw8M&amp;sns=fb" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZSUb5wFw8M&amp;sns=fb</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 22:33:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271319#post271319</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271319#post271319</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Keys opinion of Justice Winkleman's deliberation are &ndash; That's just another legal opinion &ndash; he sees the operation of law as a thing that you just keep running with, getting legal opinion after legal opinion, until you have the one that justifies the action you want to take or have…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:48:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271311#post271311</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271311#post271311</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Actually very much IMO.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 20:17:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271301#post271301</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271301#post271301</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>an independent lawyer will be assigned</q></p><p>I guess they'll need to find one who hasn't already blogged or tweeted what they think ;-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 16:34:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271295#post271295</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271295#post271295</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Question for Graeme: what’s the status of that order in light of what we now know? Does it cease to be valid? Can the court overturn it? Or is it only ever an advisory notice to the court and the judge can ignore it or observe as they choose?</q></p><p>After…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 14:32:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271290#post271290</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271290#post271290</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>we have the Deputy Prime Minister signing a suppression order as a result – a revelation in itself.</q></p><p>Actually not so much, IMO. Not revealing the involvement and output of the intelligence services isn't exactly a shocking development when we're talking about a court case where things will be public…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 11:31:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271276#post271276</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271276#post271276</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Key’s challenge is, “Prove it”. </q></p><p>I was thinking of tweeting something similar over the weekend. Why are we granting this clown the benefit of doubt?</p><p>A genuinely independent inquiry with broad scope by the Ombudsman or similarly trustworthy agency who can keep genuinely sensitive information secret seems warranted at the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 09:54:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271270#post271270</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271270#post271270</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Another residual matter will dog the Government &ndash; Key's failure to take responsibility for his department's fundamental mistakes.</q></p><p>That this all stems from a "department's fundamental mistake" is improbable.</p><p>We are only aware of this GCSB issue as KDC legal team pursued it &ndash; we have the Deputy Prime Minister…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 09:20:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271264#post271264</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271264#post271264</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Long may it do so!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 01:07:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271258#post271258</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271258#post271258</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And so the Teapot Tape comes back to haunt Key.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2012 23:23:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271256#post271256</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271256#post271256</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The Press delivers a <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/opinion/editorials/7745317/The-dots-still-do-not-join-up-in-the-case-of-the-incompetent-spies" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">pretty firm editorial</a> which is unimpressed with the Inspector General but concludes:</p><p><q>The narrow focus was forced on Neazor because of the terms of reference drawn up by the Prime Minister. They had the advantage, from John Key's perspective, of producing a quick report and denying…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2012 22:26:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271224#post271224</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271224#post271224</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>That’s a relief, because he frankly came across like a tired old fool on TV3 News last night.</q></p><p>That was a concerning image wasn't it?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2012 18:27:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271193#post271193</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271193#post271193</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>GOODNESS! <br />I really should watch more televsion! Seriously!<br />This crap has been out there &ndash; snd no official thingie has done ANYTHING!<br />Fukx o dear -readies comment blowtorch and heavyduty sarcasm armoury- GOoooo!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 23:15:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271192#post271192</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271192#post271192</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>JK’s being so out of the loop is unlikely</q></p><p>Utterly implausible. Campbell Live's story five months ago about <a href="http://www.3news.co.nz/Who-knew-what-about-Kim-Dotcom/tabid/817/articleID/252734/Default.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">who knew what</a> is still pertinent &ndash; detailing the many people and organisations who would have to have not told Key anything. Here's <a href="http://www.3news.co.nz/John-Key-discusses-Dotcom-saga/tabid/817/articleID/253053/Default.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the PM responding</a> 2 days later. Watch the clips…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 22:36:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271190#post271190</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271190#post271190</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Early on, Key declared he had never heard of Mr Dotcom. Much of the subsequent confustication can be explained as the ‘facts’ being circled to protect this assertion. Pure speculation, but (even?) John Armstrong <a href="http://www.odt.co.nz/news/politics/228100/opinion-dotcom-voodoo-takes-shine-keys-halo" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">hints strongly</a> that JK’s being so out of the loop is unlikely.<br /><q>if Mr Dotcom did…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 21:40:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ds</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271175#post271175</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271175#post271175</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The spies were told by the cops that DotCom was 'legal'<br />The spies got an in house opinion that he was fair game, not legal. Game on.</p><p>Then they got a suppression order from Bill while the boss was away cause they screwed had up.</p><p>This was not a 'brain…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:41:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271169#post271169</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271169#post271169</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The thing about cockup vs conspiracy is that if there is a pattern of consistent cockup, I still want something done.</q></p><p>Same. And if any person who is entrusted with an oversight role doesn't, then I want them out of the way. This stuff is not some kind of game.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 09:56:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271168#post271168</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271168#post271168</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						That's a relief, because he frankly came across like a tired old fool on TV3 News last night. Hardly reassuring, though I've never doubted if there's any lying or conniving for plausible deniability it's from senior Ministers.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 09:55:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271166#post271166</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271166#post271166</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The thing about cockup vs conspiracy is that if there is a pattern of consistent cockup, I still want something done.</p><p>And yeah, there may be no conspiracy to achieve a dastardly aim, but there can still be collusion to hide systemic incompetence.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 09:40:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271163#post271163</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271163#post271163</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I know Neazor personally, though not as well as I used to.(Went to school with his son etc). Mind like a steel trap and scrupulous to a fault. All in all, a man I trust to speak the truth. If he <strong>had</strong> discussed those instances with Key, he would not…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 08:59:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271160#post271160</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271160#post271160</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>From the herald this morning:</p><p><a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10837316" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10837316</a></p><p>Sir Geoffrey Palmer</p><p><q>Sir Geoffrey said Mr Key should have been told from the start.</p><p>"I would have thought if the GCSB was using its sophisticated surveillance methods in a situation like this, it would be prudent to tell the minister. I don't understand…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 07:19:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271146#post271146</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271146#post271146</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Connive, Obfuscate, Destroy &ndash; Connive, Obfuscate, Destroy
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 19:35:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271136#post271136</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271136#post271136</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Right. Any ideas on how much Kim Dotcom might be <a href="http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/i-prefer-not-sue-nz-government-dotcom-ck-129476" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">awarded/ receive</a> from the NZ Government for the ongoing local legal bungling?</p><blockquote><p>"I prefer not to sue the NZ Government," Mr Dotcom said through his official Twitter account. "We love it here &amp; we don't want to burden tax payers."</p><p>He…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:12:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271134#post271134</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271134#post271134</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The company was shut down by the US</q></p><p>and I'd expect them to pay, yes.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:41:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271133#post271133</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271133#post271133</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>that the senior management are then exempt from prosecution (because they didn't do the intercepting) but the lower-level employees who actually did the intercepting get prosecuted? That doesn't seem the slightest bit fair.</q></p><p>Yet our honourable PM has been doing his best today to do exactly that by blaming the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:41:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Telfar Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271131#post271131</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271131#post271131</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>You do need to factor in a heavily-armed raid on your family and home by a few dozen men in black and some helicopters landing in your yard unannounced. Bonus points for wife in late stages of pregnancy.</q>The only reason I didn't factor that into the privacy breach was that…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:09:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271130#post271130</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271130#post271130</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Sad story that. The company was shut down by the US so... I'm interested as to a rough figure the New Zealand taxpayer would end up shouldering in case of settlement, (on top of legal, policing, spying, ministerial costs to date).</p><p>How much are *the people of New Zealand* likely…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:01:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271129#post271129</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271129#post271129</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yeah, there is a difference between public availability and throwing anyone who asks in jail. There isn't a <a href="http://www.minedu.govt.nz/theMinistry/AboutUs/LeadershipTeam/LeadershipTeam.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">page like this</a>  <a href="http://www.police.govt.nz/about/structure.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">or even like this</a> on the GCSB website as far as I can tell.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:00:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>FletcherB</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271127#post271127</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271127#post271127</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Assuming the case against Dotcom eventually gets thrown out, would the government be liable for his legal expenses? (€2.6 million+)</q></p><p>Legal Expenses schmegal expenses.... what about the death of a company (reputedly) valued around $1 billion. (Mega Uploads)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:41:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271123#post271123</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271123#post271123</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>That’s the NZSIS you’re thinking of, where it is illegal to name staff publicly other than the Director. No such requirement for anonymity applies to the GCSB.</q></p><p>They do try and keep their identity secret however. Hager was able to identify them by looking... can't remember if it was an…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:46:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271122#post271122</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271122#post271122</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Cockup is far more likely than deep, dark conspiracy</q></p><p>The only cock up was they got found out.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:38:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271121#post271121</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271121#post271121</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Assuming the case against Dotcom eventually gets thrown out, would the government be liable for his legal expenses? (€2.6 million+)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:33:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271118#post271118</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271118#post271118</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security-technology-and-liberty/new-justice-department-documents-show-huge-increase" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">ACLU notes</a> increase in warrantless intercepts in US.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:16:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271116#post271116</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271116#post271116</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						There's enough craziness going on with this that you don't have to make up scenarios. Cockup is far more likely than deep, dark conspiracy.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:48:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271113#post271113</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271113#post271113</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So they had the email contents BEFORE they had (legal) physical access to the hardware?</q></p><p>Likely, some of it anyway &ndash;  and then consider the team gathering the evidence &ndash; made up of NZ Police/OFCANZ, GSCB and the FBI gathered the evidence largely in NZ &ndash; with the GSCB playing…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:33:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271108#post271108</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271108#post271108</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Completely legal and above-board.</q></p><p>If we were a colony of the US, maybe.</p><p>But suppose some of the emails were between Kim Dotcom in Coatesville, and counterparties here or elsewhere. The US seized/intercepted them from internet traffic or an ISP. That act had elements located within NZ (sending the email)…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:59:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271107#post271107</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271107#post271107</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> GCSB staff other than the Director are, I think, anonymous. They could announce an un-named manager has resigned without us knowing if that person even existed</q></p><p>That's the NZSIS you're thinking of, where it is illegal to name staff publicly other than the Director. No such requirement for anonymity applies…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:55:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271103#post271103</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271103#post271103</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I thought the emails were presented in support of the seizure warrants</q></p><p>Me too. I presumed from intercepts in US &ndash; but maybe NZ in light of GCSB and SIS involvement?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:38:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271102#post271102</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271102#post271102</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Basically, I’m thinking of whoever the poor legal person was at GCSB who made the wrong call, and wondering what will happen to them.</q></p><p>I think that's just an employment issue. The illegality was not stuffing up the call as to what GCSB could do, the illegality was doing it…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:29:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>FletcherB</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271100#post271100</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271100#post271100</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yes, but I thought the emails were presented in support of the seizure warrants no? (according to the way news reports were presented)<br />So they had the email contents BEFORE they had (legal) physical access to the hardware?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:06:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271098#post271098</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271098#post271098</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Not sure. There were also US-based seizures.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:01:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271097#post271097</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271097#post271097</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The Feds got warrants, seized computers, gathered evidence</q></p><p>So the emails were intercepted in the US?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:00:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271096#post271096</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271096#post271096</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Now wondering how those were obtained..</q></p><p>The seized hardrives that were later cloned and copies inadvertently given to the FBI.</p><p>The purpose of the raid being the arrest, and search for and seizure of evidence.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:58:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271090#post271090</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271090#post271090</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> including emails between the arrestees. Now wondering how those were obtained</q></p><p>Seizure warrants in the US. It's well-known how that evidence was gathered, and there's nothing dodgy about it. The Feds got warrants, seized computers, gathered evidence. Completely legal and above-board.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:04:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271086#post271086</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271086#post271086</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I notice the prime minister was to scared to enter the house today….poor wee thing</q></p><p>Yeah. Although I entirely accept the PM may have other competing commitments, I expect attendance of Parliament to be close to the top in terms of priorities. More so, when you’re the Minister responsible for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:29:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271083#post271083</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271083#post271083</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Juha Saarinen has a story in Wired examining the <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/09/megaupload-police/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Police planning documents</a> for the raid.</p><p><q>According to the documents, the preferred option for the police was to drop a “primary arrest team proximate to the dwelling” with STG and AOS officers in “lower standard of dress” following in vehicles on…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:49:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271082#post271082</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271082#post271082</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>of course, he may feel that the invasion of his privacy is worse than being extradited to the US, but somehow I doubt it, or at least I know which I'd prefer, if it were me.</q></p><p>You do need to factor in a heavily-armed raid on your family and home…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:38:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271080#post271080</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271080#post271080</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the offending that did occur wasn't committed by the site itself</q></p><p>At the time of the raid there was mention of evidence to the contrary to be presented in (US) court, including emails between the arrestees. Now wondering how those were obtained..</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:35:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271079#post271079</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271079#post271079</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm suspecting a bit of collusion here. What may have happened is that, knowing that GCSB couldn't target NZ residents,  the police, when requesting GCSB assistance provided a deliberately ambiguous statement of Dotcom's immigration status. GCSB came to the party by taking a generous interpretation of this and not enquiring…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:13:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Telfar Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271078#post271078</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271078#post271078</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Graeme, if what the GCSB did was criminal as well as illegal, what does that mean for individual GCSB employees?  You note that what they did may be criminal even if they are blameless.  </p><p>Basically, I'm thinking of whoever the poor legal person was at GCSB who made the wrong…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 08:54:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271077#post271077</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271077#post271077</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>I Sir Veil...</strong><br />I see that PM Key has <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/video/2012/sep/27/new-zealand-prime-minister-kim-dotcom-video?newsfeed=true" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">apologised to Dotcom</a><br />"I misspooked..." ?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 08:10:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271072#post271072</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271072#post271072</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>This Stuff Article 27 Sep 2012 &ndash; Kirsty Johnston &amp; Ian Steward &ndash; provides an outline of the next chapter .</p><p><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/7734184/Dotcoms-lawyers-question-police-statements" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/7734184/Dotcoms-lawyers-question-police-statements</a></p><p><q>The extent of the GCSB surveillance of Dotcom, and what was passed to the United States, is not yet known.</p><p>Mr Davison said in court it was "likely" there…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 07:13:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271070#post271070</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271070#post271070</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						That would need to be determined by the actual trial. The accusation is enough to warrant extradition if an indictment for such a crime is committed.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:42:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Withers</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271069#post271069</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271069#post271069</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It's highly debatable a file sharing site: 1. with Ts & Cs prohibiting copyright violation 2: with take-down procedures and 3. giving rights holders direct access to perform takedowns &ndash; can be described accurately as committing "commercial copyright violation". There may well have been offending and the site was definitely commercial...but…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:21:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271068#post271068</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271068#post271068</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Re: PM not attending House today &ndash; basically never do on Thursdays. Clark before him too.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 23:44:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271060#post271060</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271060#post271060</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						If you look at Key &ndash; The Teapot Tapes, Casino Con Centre deal, Banks Donation Saga, his attitude &ndash; no tiolets on Planet Key, and also the KDC saga &ndash; I feel Key has set a new high watermark for dishonesty and incompetence.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 21:30:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271059#post271059</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271059#post271059</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Key is an embarrasment – eventually he may be forced to resign</q> </p><p>Sooner rather than later is my fervent hope- which, given the numbers, could result in a <em>very interesting</em> situation…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 21:27:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271058#post271058</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271058#post271058</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What evidence do you have that the "NZ resident" was in reference to his immigration status rather than his principal domicile</q></p><p>They OFCANZ, GCSB and the minister did not considering the matter of domicile perse &ndash; domicile does not determine residency or citizenship eligibility does. But this is not the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 21:10:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tristan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271057#post271057</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271057#post271057</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I notice the prime minister was to scared to enter the house today....poor wee thing
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:59:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Euan Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271050#post271050</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271050#post271050</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It is fascinating that the law applies a different philosophical approach to spying on domestic residents than it does to similar offences like unauthorised access to a computer.  In the former case not knowing about the illegality of your action is not a defence while in the latter case it…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 19:03:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ubernaut</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271049#post271049</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271049#post271049</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Indeed. Mr "all radar, no compass" was always going to struggle when dislodged from the high ground..
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:35:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271048#post271048</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271048#post271048</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>whether there is room for the responsible GCSB officers to be prosecuted under the Crimes Act.</q></p><p>Neazor's finding that the information gathering was illegal opens up that avenue, regardless of what Key's said. See the original post from Graeme for the necessary information about what needs to happen for that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:32:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271047#post271047</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271047#post271047</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I put it to you the very real possibility that to OFCANZ, GSCB and the PM it just wasn’t an issue that was considered – the residency status of KDC – until it was pointed out to them by KDC’s lawyers.<br /></q><br />So they then went back and fabricated a sufficient…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:24:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271046#post271046</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271046#post271046</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>There is a very real and pressing need to start building tiolets on Planet Key.</p><p>But who gets the the job to clean them after this gets flushed out of the system, there is more to come.  The disclosure thing and all.</p><p>He was disappointed in a Plymough Satelitte, Faster…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:59:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Chris Waugh</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271045#post271045</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271045#post271045</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I'm wondering, particularly given the comments attributed to John Key in <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/7734301/PM-releases-Dotcom-spying-report" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this story</a>, whether there is room for the responsible GCSB officers to be prosecuted under the Crimes Act.</p><p>'Responsible' is no longer a word I would use to describe John Key.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:47:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271044#post271044</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271044#post271044</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The visa he was granted in 2009 wouldn't have qualified him for protection, it seems, but a subsequent law change altered that status.</q></p><p>I'd be interested to know what visa he was granted in 2009 &ndash; perhaps Mr Dotcom himself might supply a copy by way of clarification?</p><p>The system…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:14:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271042#post271042</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271042#post271042</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>At the seat of most major shambles are people not reading the instructions and proceeding on assumptions &ndash; that people are cognitive misers I have stated before.</p><p>I put it to you the very real possibility that to OFCANZ, GSCB and the PM it just wasn't an issue that was…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:45:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271041#post271041</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271041#post271041</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						This is <a href="http://inthehouse.co.nz/node/15436" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">a new high point</a> for Hon. Dr Lockwood Smith as the Speaker (kudos to the Greens for framing the issue this way)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:26:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271040#post271040</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271040#post271040</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>even you Matthew appear here to be so enamoured by his charisma that you ardently support a position that defends his shambles of an administration.</q></p><p>*snort*</p><p>I support a position that GCSB were entitled to rely on an assurance from another government agency. I've called that agency's assurance a fuckup,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:20:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271039#post271039</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271039#post271039</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Can the GCSB spy on Aussies permanently living in NZ without a resident visa?</q></p><p>That's a very interesting question, and one I'd love an answer to.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:11:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>FletcherB</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271038#post271038</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271038#post271038</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The system is quite simple – there are two main classes of visa, resident and temporary. </q></p><p>I'm trying to figure out if I qualify as a "foreign national", "resident" or something else....  (I am in practice resident- but what's my legal status?)</p><p>I'm of Australian birth, and have an Australian…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:05:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>wendyf</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271037#post271037</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271037#post271037</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						What has happened to the other three men who were with KDC?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:56:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271036#post271036</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271036#post271036</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Neazor's report meets, to a degree, farce with farce</p><p>Well OFCANZ weren't confused &ndash; they state KDC is a NZ Resident.</p><p>First Citizen John Key is just too great everybody loves him, men want to be him, women want to be with him and his govt is divine &ndash; even…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:54:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>greenlove33</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271035#post271035</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271035#post271035</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Nice analysis. Cheers!!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:53:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271034#post271034</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271034#post271034</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I've recently been watching the Yes Minister series from the beginning. I see I will be able to pause my (legally purchased) DVD and watch the real thing for a time.  It is fun comparing the two. </p><p>Please pass the popcorn.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:50:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271033#post271033</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271033#post271033</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>He’s absolved the GCSB on a very spurious ground</q></p><p>GCSB wasn’t really going to be faulted for relying on OFCANZ’s assurances. If they couldn’t take the word of the Police, something was wrong. He hasn’t said that GCSB didn’t gather information, and he hasn’t said that GCSB’s gathering was, somehow,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:42:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271032#post271032</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271032#post271032</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm disappointed by Neazor's report. He's absolved the GCSB on a very spurious ground. While KDC's visa status was first one thing then the other, by the time the surveillance occurred, he was most definitely covered by permanent residency. Heads will not roll, and they should. Even Bill English has…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:37:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271031#post271031</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271031#post271031</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I don't buy that.</p><p>The system is quite simple &ndash; there are <a href="http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2009/0051/latest/DLM1440683.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">two main classes of visa</a>, resident and temporary. The former defines "permanent resident" in the GCSB Act. When a person migrates to NZ, they will get a residence visa (usually) with conditions &ndash; once those are met, it…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:35:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271030#post271030</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271030#post271030</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Funny, the OFCANZ request for STG Assitance dated 9th Jan 2012 notes that KDC and his wife are NZ Residents.</p><p>It is not a mistake – it is bullshit.</q></p><p>See Neazor's report. Being an "NZ resident" in that request doesn't necessarily mean what it needs to mean for the GCSB's…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:21:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271028#post271028</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271028#post271028</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://bit.ly/TDQiCW" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Neazor's report is out</a>. The verdict is that changes to immigration law got people confused about Dotcom's actual residence status. The visa he was granted in 2009 wouldn't have qualified him for protection, it seems, but a subsequent law change altered that status.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:19:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271027#post271027</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271027#post271027</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Funny, the OFCANZ request for STG Assitance dated 9th Jan 2012 notes that KDC and his wife are NZ Residents.</p><p>It is not a mistake &ndash; it is bullshit.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:08:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271026#post271026</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271026#post271026</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>IMHO.</p><p>It may all starts to happen after Justice Winkleman's judgment.- should the judgement rule in favour of disclosure as sought by KDC the govt could unravel &ndash; if not Key will smirk his way through to the next election and the nation can then make the choice.</p><p>The Nazor…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:57:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271022#post271022</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271022#post271022</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Interesting that p19 of <a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/1fYkm96p7RysMrLEyHj7VTNrlEiidUrpfUuvxvctSBJXbmyHSi7hdgBSm1ewX/edit" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this doc</a> refers to "emails intercepted by the FBI".</p><p>Which suggests that the US authorities do have such a capability and use it.</p><p>I'm interested in the legal liability of NZ authorities (GCSB, police) receiving such information. Legal if the monitoring was done overseas? Even if…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:49:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hebe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271021#post271021</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271021#post271021</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>I always hope that Key is vain enough to spin the wheel at the last minute</q>'S ok, Mr Crosby and Mr Textor will see you now
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:35:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271020#post271020</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271020#post271020</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Gordon Campbell writes about the <a href="http://gordoncampbell.scoop.co.nz/2012/09/27/gordon-campbell-on-the-flawed-inquiry-into-the-dotcom-security-breaches/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">signifcant limitations</a> on Neazor's role as Inspector General of our Security Services. Doubt the govt has much to worry about from his report, somehow.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:35:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271018#post271018</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271018#post271018</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>I know nothing...</strong><br /><q>Key looks in off-guard moments like <br />he knows his luck has turned </q><br />Aye, his recent diet of 'mumble pie' <br />does not sit well with him...</p><p>I think this whole Gov't needs to be<br />advised of what their Legacy will be...<br />Brownlee is probably happy being reviled,<br />but…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:22:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271014#post271014</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271014#post271014</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So, is this actually going to be part of Neazor’s inquiry? Or is the wider problem going to be quietly swept under the rug?</q></p><p>I'd have thought it was an IPCA matter. Or simply a matter that can be properly dealt with by Justice Winkelmann along with the various other…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:38:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hebe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271012#post271012</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271012#post271012</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>I've seen a National-friendly columnist in Granny pass comment on how obvious it is that National release pointless-but-headline grabbing policies at points when their reputation is on the line </q>Oh dearie  dearie me. Key looks in off-guard moments like he knows his luck has turned &mdash; there's a point in…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:22:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271011#post271011</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271011#post271011</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So, is this actually going to be part of Neazor’s inquiry? Or is the wider problem going to be quietly swept under the rug?</q></p><p>Why would it be Neazor's concern, TBH? I would say it's a concern to be raised at the political level by the Justice Select Committee.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:22:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271008#post271008</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271008#post271008</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The actions of the Police in using the GCSB as an end-run around laws we have put in place deliberately limiting police powers are of much greater concern.</q></p><p>So, is this actually going to be part of Neazor's inquiry?  Or is the wider problem going to be quietly swept under…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:07:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271006#post271006</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271006#post271006</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Isn’t the issue the breach of s 14.?</q></p><p>As Graeme has pointed out there is no crime attached to that section. All it does is make it impossible for the interception to be legal, which then presents the options for Crimes Act prosecutions for unlawful interception.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:59:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271005#post271005</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271005#post271005</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Isn't the issue the breach of s 14.?</p><p><q>s 14 Interceptions not to target domestic communications<br />Neither the Director, nor an employee of the Bureau, nor a person acting on behalf of the Bureau may authorise or take any action for the purpose of intercepting the communications of a person…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:53:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271003#post271003</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271003#post271003</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I can imagine the NZ police and perhaps SIS and GCSB now saying “Oh, yes, can we have some of that, too?”</q></p><p>“that” being storage of ISP customer data (including emails) for two years, compulsion warrants for passwords [ETA: which we already have], and interception requirements for things like Skype.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:45:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271000#post271000</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=271000#post271000</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I wonder what the smokescreen is going to be.</q></p><p>The consensus in the Facebook-o-sphere is that Collins' announcement of <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10836779" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">more parole changes</a> is the "look over there" action in this case. I've seen a National-friendly columnist in Granny pass comment on how obvious it is that National release pointless-but-headline grabbing policies…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:38:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Martin Roberts</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270996#post270996</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270996#post270996</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Conspiracy is probably one of those words which doesn't necessarily mean what I thought it did.  </p><p>I recall being surprised that Money Laundering includes any movement across borders of money you knew to be illegally obtained.  I had thought some sort of secrecy or furtive dealings had to be involved,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:29:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Chris Waugh</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270995#post270995</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270995#post270995</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Quite a tangent, but I can imagine the NZ police and perhaps SIS and GCSB now saying <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&amp;objectid=10836830" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">"Oh, yes, can we have some of that, too?"</a>. Australia worries me.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:17:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270994#post270994</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270994#post270994</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						True. Yet that's not what most reporting has concluded over the last year. Seemed the whole 'MegaUpload Conspiracy' angle was pushed pretty heavily by agencies too.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:16:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270993#post270993</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270993#post270993</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Why were we only told on Monday?</q></p><p>Those 'other reasons' seem pretty persuasive to us non-lawyers &ndash; principally the timing of the visit by Panetta.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:15:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Thomas Beagle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270992#post270992</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270992#post270992</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I believe you can get five years jail for commercial copyright violation, and that this would be enough to qualify for extradition.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:14:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270991#post270991</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270991#post270991</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Police can obtain interception warrants under the Crimes Act 1961, but they are basically limited to terrorism, serious violent offences, and offences of organised crime.* Which I don't believe is alleged.</q></p><p>Doesn't the whole extradition case hinge on an alleged criminal 'conspiracy', given that copyright violation on its own is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:14:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hebe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270990#post270990</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270990#post270990</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Me, I'm just stocking up on popcorn. The show has only just begun</q>Yes! All the elements; and a grumpy and loaded   protagonist firing up the lawyers. I particularly enjoyed Ira Rothken's deeply wounded sincerity on TV news a night or two ago: those American lawyers sure know when and how…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:59:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270988#post270988</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270988#post270988</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Could closer US-NZ relations be construed as contributing to “the national security of New Zealand”?</q></p><p>In that respect, founding father Benjamin Franklin once wrote that "they who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:28:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270985#post270985</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270985#post270985</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>My money is on Subsection 2b "to protect the safety of any person:"<br />As you point out by quoting Adam Bennet's article in the Herald “location, awareness on the part of the wanted person of law enforcement interest in them, or any information indicating risk factors in effecting any arrest”…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:51:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Wilbur Townsend</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270982#post270982</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270982#post270982</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q> … even if Kim Dotcom did not have permanent residence, why on Earth the GCSB would be assisting the police in circumstances such as these currently appear to be…. the overall objection of the GCSB, which should guide its operations, “is to contribute to the national security of New Zealand.”</q>…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:32:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Thomas Beagle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270980#post270980</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270980#post270980</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I suspect that this Police end-run around our law is part of a pattern of behaviour by the Police.</p><p>There is also some evidence to show that the Police are also using Customs extensive search-at-the-border powers to do intelligence gathering for them. We know that Customs allow the Police direct…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:08:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ross Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270979#post270979</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270979#post270979</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Does this "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_national " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> Foreign National</a>" link help?</p><p>It reeks of the GCSB/Police (again!) being Amerikanized by their definition.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:02:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>barry89</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270978#post270978</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270978#post270978</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>You have to put yourself in the police shoes.<br />You want to find out about this guy but you know that hes really pretty internet savy &ndash; so you ask the obvious question &ndash; "Who is the most likely to be able to listen into him and not be found…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:58:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270974#post270974</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270974#post270974</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> The actions of the Police in using the GCSB as an end-run around laws we have put in place deliberately limiting police powers are of much greater concern.</q></p><p>So in order to pervert the law you need to know the law?<br />The labyrinthine by ways of the legal system need…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:07:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270973#post270973</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270973#post270973</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Good analysis, as usual. </p><p>Me, I'm just stocking up on popcorn. The show has only just begun.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:02:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danyl Mclauchlan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270969#post270969</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270969#post270969</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks Graeme &ndash; you're a (domestic) national treasure.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 05:41:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270966#post270966</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270966#post270966</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Meant to have this yesterday, but it took longer than I hoped!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:05:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270965#post270965</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-kim-dotcom-questions-and-answers/?p=270965#post270965</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:05:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
