<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Legal Beagle: Absent Members</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Hilary Stace</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176861#post176861</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176861#post176861</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Graeme, saw you on last night's Court Report. I love that programme; it makes the law seem really exciting and, well,  just.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:26:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176374#post176374</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176374#post176374</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>So an errant MP is found to be in contempt of the House ... and then what?<br />...<br />(3) They have to pay a fine to the House (if the House actually has the power to fine, which it probably doesn't)?</p></blockquote><p>I would note that the question of whether the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:12:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176326#post176326</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176326#post176326</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Now cue debate as to whether s.55 of the Electoral Act 1993 has overridden Parliament's historical privilege to expel its members ...</p></blockquote><p>I take it you <a href="http://www.pundit.co.nz/content/simon-to-sian-shut-up-please" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">read Pundit</a>...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 17:00:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Grassed Up</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176309#post176309</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176309#post176309</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"Lockwood Smith doesn't need to make a late submission to the Law Commission, and wait for the resulting legislation to traipse through Parliament; he can write a letter to the Standing Orders Committee asking them to consider whether wagging from the House should be a contempt of Parliament."</p><p>So an…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 16:23:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andre Alessi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176305#post176305</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176305#post176305</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Ms Kopu felt she was in Parliament as a Māori woman to represent Māori women. She accepted that she wasn't the important part in this (at 12 on the Alliance list, who had heard of her?), but she felt that what she represented was important (people voted for the Alliance…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 15:51:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176298#post176298</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176298#post176298</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>as someone who at one time voted Alliance with my list vote, only to see Alamein Kopu paid $70K a year not turn up to work, then to refuse to represent the party she was a List MP for, for more than two years, I would disagree that simply being…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 15:21:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176275#post176275</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176275#post176275</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I/S posts on the subject, dealing with much of what has been discussed here, and concludes by saying</p><blockquote><p>Graeme suggests simply making unjustified absence a contempt of Parliament. Its an elegant solution, which recognises that MPs get to regulate themselves, and it doesn't require any law changes. At the same…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 14:35:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176270#post176270</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176270#post176270</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I'm 100% with Graeme on this. The electorate should be the judge of an MPs performance. Having Parliament able to sanction members is at best unnecessary and at worst an interference with our right to elect who we choose.</p><p>Following from that though, if it's a breach of the BORA…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 14:27:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andre Alessi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176243#post176243</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176243#post176243</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I've just been reading through the <a href="http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/PB/Debates/Debates/4/f/5/48HansD_20051206_00001032-Electoral-Integrity-Amendment-Bill-First.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">transcript</a> of the Electoral (Integrity) Amendment Bill (First Reading).  Quite interesting stuff, given subsequent events.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 13:59:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andre Alessi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176238#post176238</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176238#post176238</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>In a democracy, there doesn't need to be legislation around things like MP absences or party-hopping. If it's a big deal for us, we get to kick them out.</p></blockquote><p>To go off on a slight tangent: as someone who at one time voted Alliance with my list vote, only to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 13:50:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176233#post176233</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176233#post176233</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>You people all realise that health is a prohibited ground of discrimination in NZ, and that sacking someone for being sick is both illegal and immoral, right?</p><p>And yes, that applies to the House too.  The BORA binds them just as much as it binds every other part of the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 13:36:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176231#post176231</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176231#post176231</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And of course, being in the House is no measure of effectiveness. </p><p>Roger Douglas was reading<a href="http://www.robertcrais.com/novels.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> bad crime-fiction</a> in the house the other day. Yeah, I'm probably in contempt, but some things are simply contemptuous.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 13:32:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176218#post176218</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176218#post176218</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I don't mind that, but there's a valid question to be asked of how long an MP can be paid to be an MP but not actually do the work. 2 months? 6 months? a year?</p></blockquote><p>3 years per review. And if they're still getting voted in, then perhaps them…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 12:54:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176214#post176214</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176214#post176214</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Surely at some stage the speaker has to say to their party leader "umm, what are we paying this guy for again?"</p></blockquote><p>Perfectly reasonable. The mechanism to allow this is for the House to amend Standing Orders.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 12:46:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176212#post176212</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176212#post176212</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Basically their main job is to represent, and they have a lot of leeway in how they do that, and the mechanism for the constituents to reward or punish them is already in place.</p></blockquote><p>I think that's an argument at cross purposes to what is happening with Carter. If he…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 12:41:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176183#post176183</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176183#post176183</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Well, I guess while your MP is contemplating legislation while wrapped around a hot water bottle, there might be one or two constituents in Te Atatu hoping someone is covering the constituency clinics.</p></blockquote><p>There's a lot of ways they could spend their days that would be wonderful to people in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 11:35:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176177#post176177</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176177#post176177</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I liked the old idea of actually having to be in the house to vote, at least then the opposition had a chance to affect the outcome of a debate. The whole party whip thing needs a good rodgering too, if you ask me, there is little point in having…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 11:25:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176169#post176169</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176169#post176169</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I agree that treating our MPs like schoolchildren or clock-watching factory hands is silly. I don't vote for them to sit around in Parliament.</p></blockquote><p>Um... no, but by the same token I think it was entirely justifiable for eyebrows to raise when the US Senator with the worse attendance record…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 11:14:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176168#post176168</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176168#post176168</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Why was I not surprised to find you blogger link going to Kiwiblog? DPF has banged on about this shit for years and years, like enforcing his idea of working hours on MPs is somehow going to make them actually do better jobs.</p></blockquote><p>I actually wrote the sentence first, and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 11:13:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176166#post176166</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176166#post176166</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'm thinking of solutions that don't require changes to the law &ndash; like you I agree that it's not a particularly useful one. Is there the possibility of a statutory body (the SSC?) publishing a register of attendance?</p></blockquote><p>A statutory body? No chance. Parliament doesn't like being told what to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 11:07:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176164#post176164</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176164#post176164</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>I'm thinking of solutions that don't require changes to the law &ndash; like you I agree that it's not a particularly useful one. Is there the possibility of a statutory body (the SSC?) publishing a register of attendance? I mean, it's difficult enough to work out who attended Parliament on…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 11:04:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176155#post176155</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176155#post176155</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Excuse me if I'm unusually cynical right now, I live in Australia where the media thinks they're the chorus in an Andrew Lloyd Webber musical and keep singing "where are the clowns, there ought to be clowns..."</p></blockquote><p>Moz: That would be a Sondheim musical, and rather than 'Send in The…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 10:57:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176150#post176150</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176150#post176150</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Or Flybuys &ndash; every sitting day gets you closer to that shiny toaster. They could even add the remaining travel perks to the scheme.</p></blockquote><p>To address Ben Wilson's point above, select committees could be worth more points, as would ministerial responsibilities.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 10:47:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mikaere Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176140#post176140</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176140#post176140</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>IIRC, Gerry Adams et al were able to be absentee MPs at Westminster &ndash; they had a policy of never setting foot there.  I think this was a factor in moving Northand Island politics from violence to dialogue.  Full-time, paid activists are able to get a lot done.</p><p>This is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 10:28:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Thomas Johnson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176139#post176139</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176139#post176139</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I thought that they whole $10 story was rather pointless. Surely Carter is getting much more 'punishment' by Labour leader and party than any sort of hand-smacking by the speaker. </p><p>Focussing on attendence is rather pointless, anyone who cares can find out which MP's are doing a decent job by…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 10:21:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176136#post176136</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176136#post176136</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I agree that treating our MPs like schoolchildren or clock-watching factory hands is silly. I don't vote for them to sit around in Parliament. I did it so that they would vote in the important legislation in a direction I agree with. How they come by their opinions on what…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 10:10:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176126#post176126</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176126#post176126</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Solution: foursquare!</p></blockquote><p>Or Flybuys &ndash; every sitting day gets you closer to that shiny toaster. They could even add the remaining travel perks to the scheme.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 09:26:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joanna</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176122#post176122</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176122#post176122</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Solution: foursquare! Who will be the mayor of the Beehive?</p></blockquote><p>Awesome!</p><p>Also Graeme, what's up with this whole rational thinking business about how actually we do have control over our MPs? Shouldn't you just be baying for blood?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 09:01:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>rustyskates</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176119#post176119</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176119#post176119</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Ahem: when I worked in woollen mills, you clocked in.<br />Is this going to be so difficult for hon members in this electronc age?</p></blockquote><p>Solution: foursquare! Who will be the mayor of the Beehive?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 08:45:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176116#post176116</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176116#post176116</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Ahem: when I worked in woollen mills, you clocked in.<br />Is this going to be so difficult for hon members in this electronc age?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 01:18:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176115#post176115</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176115#post176115</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm thinking of solutions that don't require changes to the law &ndash; like you I agree that it's not a particularly useful one. Is there the possibility of a statutory body (the SSC?) publishing a register of attendance? I mean, it's difficult enough to work out who attended Parliament on…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 00:51:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176113#post176113</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176113#post176113</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>What about those members whom the electorate would gladly pay if only they would absent themselves from the house?</p><p>Excuse me if I'm unusually cynical right now, I live in Australia where the media thinks they're the chorus in an Andrew Lloyd Webber musical and keep singing "where are the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 00:21:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176112#post176112</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/legal-beagle-absent-members/?p=176112#post176112</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 00:21:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
