<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Hard News: Why we thought what we thought</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322738#post322738</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322738#post322738</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm not surprised. His explanation makes sense &ndash; he shares the ideals but differs in the practical implementation. Differs so much that it's quite important to him, but doesn't show up on the graph. I think that's quite common on the Left &ndash; there are, after all, many kinds of…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sept 2014 00:46:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322737#post322737</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322737#post322737</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>For instance, Randroids would consider supporting the free market to be a form of social liberality (you are free to spend how you like, making moral choices with your money), and thus object to being placed at the authoritarian end of the graph. They could consider themselves to be in…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sept 2014 00:32:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Parks</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322731#post322731</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322731#post322731</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Except that would not be an entirely honest answer to the question Key asked. It wouldn’t necessarily be exempt, that depends on the use of the property.</q></p><p>I didn’t know the exact wording wording of Key’s question (hence, my ‘along the lines of’), but now I’ve seen it I still…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sept 2014 23:58:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322579#post322579</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322579#post322579</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The trouble with all of those examples you’ve given is that they are effectively one-man bands</q></p><p>Yes, I'm treating both individuals and parties as points. The point would be some kind of point estimate based on the individuals in it. The mean location is a good choice as it marks…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sept 2014 09:55:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322560#post322560</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322560#post322560</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Drop all of them (Key &amp; Cunliffe included) on White Island and see who works with who, and who survives … fully televised!<br />Has this idea been used Electorally yet?</q></p><p>Love to put in the OIA request on <strong>that</strong> one!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sept 2014 09:16:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322542#post322542</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322542#post322542</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Lord of the Files...</strong><br /><q>I’d rather see one show of all the likely ... coalition partners </q><br />Drop all of them (Key &amp; Cunliffe included) on White Island and see who works with who, and who survives ... fully televised!<br />Has this idea been used Electorally yet?<br />;-  )</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sept 2014 07:49:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322536#post322536</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322536#post322536</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I think part of the problem with the current debates is the candidates being encouraged to shout over each other.</q></p><p>Reflects media framing the election as a one-on-one testosterone fest rather than a nuanced MMP conversation. Compare with the tone of the Campbell Live multi-party dinner or any of Native…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sept 2014 07:21:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322531#post322531</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322531#post322531</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>“Of course it would be exempt. Why wouldn’t it be exempt, John?”</q></p><p>Except that would not be an entirely honest answer to the question Key asked. It wouldn’t necessarily be exempt, that depends on the use of the property. </p><p>As a seasoned debater in a hostile media environment Cunliffe would…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sept 2014 06:01:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Parks</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322526#post322526</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322526#post322526</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I don’t see why the CGT gaffe has become the most important thing in the news today. We have had a two hour debate and the most important thing was that DC didn’t have a rehearsed answer for a question about family trusts and CGT? </q></p><p>It shouldn’t have to have…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sept 2014 01:34:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322487#post322487</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322487#post322487</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>For instance, my distance from Winston Peters is not really a function of the two dimensions we see there. He’s miles away from me in some racist homophobic dimension you can’t see there. Similarly Peter Dunne is a long way from me on account of his main contribution to politics,…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 20:21:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alfie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322486#post322486</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322486#post322486</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Tonight's Campbell Show was a good example... 8 radio mics and a nicely balanced sound mix. It's not brain surgery. </p><p>And I reckon your taser idea is brilliant. Let the audience have one each and you'd see a drastic change in behaviour from our pollies. ;-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 20:17:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322477#post322477</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322477#post322477</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I've worked with soundies who can mix six radio mics ... I think part of the problem with the current debates is the candidates being encouraged to shout over each other.... mute or at least dip the other mics when someone has the floor. </q></p><p>This! No offense to anyone honestly…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 19:32:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322451#post322451</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322451#post322451</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Shouty John, the Graceless Berk.</q><br />Hmmmm... Could be a kids book in this...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 17:31:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>CJM</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322437#post322437</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322437#post322437</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Interesting to see that the Herald had 'comments' for the 2nd debate open but shut them this morning and have only put up 3 comments. After the overwhelming number of pro-Cunliffe comments last time clearly they feel the need to shut up the rabble at their keyboards confusing things with…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 16:48:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322386#post322386</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322386#post322386</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The cacophony of noise experienced last night </q><br />There were times when Key’s mic was almost as distorted as his ‘arguments’. <br />Anyone know who produced it?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 14:01:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322383#post322383</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322383#post322383</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Give me controlled, intelligent debate any time.</q></p><p>Let them eat Internet.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 13:49:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322382#post322382</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322382#post322382</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If necessary, mute or at least dip the other mics when someone has the floor. </q><br />I think it was actually Key who suggested Tracy Watkins step back a bit, and talk at the microphone &ndash; most of the time she talked away from it which didn't help...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 13:49:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alfie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322374#post322374</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322374#post322374</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I tweeted last night that it showed how hard producing this kind of live video on a limited budget actually is.</q><br />Good or poor production &mdash; they both require the same setup &mdash; the same number of mics, etc. The difference with a good production comes down to having a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 13:22:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322362#post322362</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322362#post322362</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> <em>The production values were bloody aweful through , audio levels all over the place , the intros were far too long and it was very hard for me to hear what Press Editor was saying.</em></p><p>That’s a valid point Richard. We tuned in around 7:35pm and found numerous technical problems.…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 13:00:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322360#post322360</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322360#post322360</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>For Pie graphs, I would rather credit the "colourful" William Playfair</p><p><a href="http://www.americanscientist.org/bookshelf/pub/a-visionary-and-a-scoundrel" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.americanscientist.org/bookshelf/pub/a-visionary-and-a-scoundrel</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 12:51:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alfie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322357#post322357</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322357#post322357</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The production values were bloody aweful through , audio levels all over the place , the intros were far too long and it was very hard for me to hear what Press Editor was saying. </q><br />That's a valid point Richard. We tuned in around 7:35pm and found numerous technical problems.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 12:44:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Cecelia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322352#post322352</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322352#post322352</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>What a great poem that you have written<br />It's like a damn fine piece of knittin'</p><p>I knit my brows in some dismay<br />That Herald folks opined that way</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 12:28:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Cecelia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322345#post322345</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322345#post322345</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The print version has a smallish sidebar "PM lands tax blow" on the front page and a double page spread pages 4 and 5. Banner headline: "Cunliffe's tax stumble brings back memories". There's a story where Cunliffe refutes Key's CGT claim but the dominant feature of the page is a…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 12:19:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322333#post322333</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322333#post322333</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Was the one gaffe in the context of the whole debate really worth the prominence it has been given in the Herald this am?</q><br />I looked at the online Herald. Almost nothing on the debate- the first two election stories were 'Hacker hits back at Collins' denial' and some 'Nick…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 11:54:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322321#post322321</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322321#post322321</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I don't mean to say that the Political Compass is useless. It's better to use a 50 year old idea than a 225 year old one. But we could use even more modern ones, since the software is there to do it.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 11:28:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322319#post322319</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322319#post322319</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>But….  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florence_Nightingale#Statistics_and_sanitary_reform " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> Florence Nightingale invented them…</a><br />Well, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_area_diagram " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> Polar Area Diagram</a> to be precise.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 11:22:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322318#post322318</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322318#post322318</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Or was it meant to be a schoolboy debate? Maybe I missed the point?</q></p><p>As I said, I turned it off after five minutes because two adults shouting over each other seemed like a waste of my host's broadband.  I know, as they say in Boston, politics isn't beanbag but…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 11:21:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322316#post322316</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322316#post322316</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						If I even mention a pie graph online I might be failed out of a statistics major on basic principles.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 11:16:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322312#post322312</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322312#post322312</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>You could do that with a Pie graph, although you may have to blow on it first and in Brownlee's case make sure he doesn't take a big bite out of it.<br />;-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 11:14:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Cecelia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322311#post322311</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322311#post322311</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>You've said so well what I wanted to say but ...</p><p>Who are the hard-core Nat supporters who gave him a clear win? The Herald people? </p><p>Weren't the snarky wit and put-downs more forced and desperate this time?</p><p>Was the one gaffe in the context of the whole debate really…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 11:12:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322310#post322310</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322310#post322310</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Well presented as a single number for each candidate you’re comparing with, sorted in order, it’s not that cumbersome. It depends how much analysis you really want to do. It’s not outrageous to aggregate the answers to related questions, I just think that there could easily be more than 2…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 11:08:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322309#post322309</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322309#post322309</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I counter with Commandments...   13 of them.<br /><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DktpzYOHTXo" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DktpzYOHTXo</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 11:02:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322308#post322308</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322308#post322308</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>he had cast himself </q><br />Knit one, purl one, cast off into a boiling sea<br />made treacherous by hidden monsters with needle teeth<br />that clatter like the hooves of an aran jumper<br />The cable knit ties that anchor are dropped<br />And sew to sea Lord Cardigan...</p><p>I do like a good…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 11:00:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322307#post322307</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322307#post322307</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>To which sin do you refer? Greed, Averace, Guutony, Sloth, wrath?, I could go the full seven but</q></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0NlXKPaqZg" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0NlXKPaqZg</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 10:55:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael Meyers</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322306#post322306</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322306#post322306</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Cunliffe should actually have known his own policy (and one IIRC he developed while finance spokesman before the last election) well enough to zing Key right back</q></p><p>While this is true, I don't see why the CGT gaffe has become the most important thing in the news today. We have…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 10:52:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322301#post322301</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322301#post322301</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I see where you are coming from now, a graph depicting something along the lines of relative scores on each question. That, surely, would become quite cumbersome and open to "cheating" yes?.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 10:49:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Cecelia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322299#post322299</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322299#post322299</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Ha! Can't think of any knitting puns but Macbeth crying for sleep comes to mind, "sleep that knits the ravelled sleeve of care". Way off topic unless you can think of a link.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 10:48:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322296#post322296</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322296#post322296</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>After the last few weeks and the first debate, Key needed a performance that re-energised the base. Hard-core Nat supporters love his snarky wit and put-downs, and they gave Key a clear win. He definitely did what was needed there.<br />Not so sure it will have worked on swing voters.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 10:45:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322293#post322293</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322293#post322293</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>The AC / DC knitting book...</strong><br /><q>he had cast himself in a silly, schoolboy role which was most unbecoming of a PM.</q><br />purls before swine &ndash; pt II</p><p>[edit: Pull those socks up boy!]</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 10:40:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322289#post322289</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322289#post322289</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>a clutch of straws...</strong><br /><q>instead of whining...</q><br />Shouting <em>'Show me the Money!'</em><br />or <em>'Whatever, whatever...'</em><br />is way more déclassé.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 10:37:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Cecelia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322286#post322286</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322286#post322286</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Not innuendo. I wouldn't be surprised if Key was cracking under the strain of Dirty Politics and the ways it's developing. If he wasn't literally drunk, he had cast himself in a silly, schoolboy role which was most unbecoming of a PM. Last time people said, "Why wasn't John Key…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 10:21:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Aston</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322285#post322285</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322285#post322285</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> He made David Cunliffe look statesman-like – a major gaffe and unmade points notwithstanding.</q><br />Yes I noticed that , Key did the school yard larriken thing and showed us that nasty little side we see in Parliament debates , he seemed obsessed with "beating" labour <br />and as you said Cecelia…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 10:20:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>stephen clover</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322282#post322282</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322282#post322282</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>National are very happy to tell the public what's wrong with Labour because they have no policy to talk about .</q></p><p>Indeed! One of the most disappointing things about Key was that at one point when asked from the floor for "specifics" of various new policies, he spent his allotted…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 10:07:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>stephen clover</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322281#post322281</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322281#post322281</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						In real time I actually really felt that Cunliffe was trying to answer the OG question from the moderator (or the floor?) and not get sucked into tit-fer-tat with Key. But suddenly he looked like he didn't know the answer.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 10:05:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322280#post322280</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322280#post322280</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> because I’m damn certain that if the shoe was on the other food Cunliffe would have been finding various polite ways to suggest the Prime Minister harden the fuck up and do his prep instead of whining.  </q></p><p>That was how it was in the first debate and Cunliffe did no…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 10:03:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Marcus Turner</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322278#post322278</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322278#post322278</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						A factor in all this that keeps disappointing me is the role of news organisations. Besides assorted internet news sites, my  main source of "audio news" is National Radio. I've been disappointed with how much presenters seem to have been concentrating on who "scored points" in a debate. I presume…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 09:57:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James George</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322277#post322277</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322277#post322277</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Incidentally it is looking awfully like granny Herald has spat the dummy, tossed in the towel , thrown her hands in the air & walked off in a hissy fit.  There have been weeks and weeks of comment threads jampacked with pissed off kiwis expressing their anger at the obvious corruption…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 09:56:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>simon g</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322276#post322276</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322276#post322276</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Watch the first part of the debate, Craig. "Incoherent" would be kind.</p><p>No, I don't think he was drunk, but if he was stone-cold sober, that's kinda worse.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 09:54:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322274#post322274</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322274#post322274</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> unless, that is, you wanted to use time as the fourth dimension </q></p><p>and </p><p><q>plot all the current election and polling data onto the surface of a four-dimensional hypercube</q></p><p>I'm not suggesting anything so exotic. That one would need to is argument enough not to do it that way. </p><p>I'm talking…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 09:51:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322272#post322272</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322272#post322272</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Cunliffe was on FirstLine this morning, complaining that Key was making stuff up about Labour’s CGT policy and he had to give Key the benefit of the doubt on the night without being able to check. </q></p><p>Obvious response: Cunliffe should actually have known his own policy (and one IIRC he…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 09:45:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Roger Lacey</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322270#post322270</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322270#post322270</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The delusions and entitlement are strong in this one….</q><br />+1<br /><q>Michele A’Court nails it today</q><br />Does she ever.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 09:38:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322265#post322265</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322265#post322265</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The full article is quite funny, in a head-shaking kind of way.</q><br />Her upside was she got to campaign in her electorate &ndash; wasn't she planning on that prior to this...<br />The delusions and entitlement are strong in this one....</p><p>It is an odd situation when our comedians make more…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 09:23:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322264#post322264</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322264#post322264</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I WIN THIS THREAD. WHATEVER.</q></p><p>When can we get a favourite button?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 09:21:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>simon g</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322262#post322262</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322262#post322262</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Speaking of our leaders displaying dignity:</p><p><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/10451707/Judith-Collins-Cunliffe-is-a-moron" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/10451707/Judith-Collins-Cunliffe-is-a-moron</a></p><p>The full article is quite funny, in a head-shaking kind of way. </p><p>Warning: may give you a Jilted John earworm (old person music reference ...)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 09:14:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>anth</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322260#post322260</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322260#post322260</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It included English? Interesting! Anything else you can recall?</q><br />That was the only bit that stood out.</p><p>The rest of what I remember:<br />How likely are you to vote?<br />Which party would you vote for if the election was tomorrow?<br />How likely are you to vote for a different party?…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 09:10:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322259#post322259</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322259#post322259</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Key acts like that kid in your class that disrupted everything all the time, and ultimately marred your education, as they chewed up time and patience…</q></p><p>That's Question Time also. I had oft' thought. If he gets no questions he'd spit the dummy. Would have liked to have seen that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 09:03:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Cecelia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322258#post322258</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322258#post322258</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						That was what I thought about the debate in a poetic little nutshell. Key seemed to have morphed into Muldoon. Not drunk, surely? Hyped himself up to win over the audience with his famed sense of humour? He made David Cunliffe look statesman-like &ndash; a major gaffe and unmade points…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 09:02:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322257#post322257</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322257#post322257</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Key acts like that kid in your class that disrupted everything all the time, and ultimately marred your education, as they chewed up time and patience…</q></p><p>I've been reliably informed by the National Party that he's talking about policy.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 09:00:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nora Leggs</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322256#post322256</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322256#post322256</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>in some cases the froth becomes<br />the ‘head’ of the country…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 08:57:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322252#post322252</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322252#post322252</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>JK was on a roll... </q><br />He was quite the 'ham'!</p><p>the 'whatevers' were particularly egregious <br />especially for an alleged 'adult!'</p><p>Cunliffe dismissed him at one point <br />as a 'schoolyard larrikin'<br />&ndash;  that was right on the money!</p><p>Key acts like that kid in your class that disrupted everything all the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 08:34:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322251#post322251</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322251#post322251</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Saw a bit and unfortunately JK was on a roll and I turned it off</q></p><p>Cunliffe was on FirstLine this morning, complaining that Key was making stuff up about Labour’s CGT policy and he had to give Key the benefit of the doubt on the night without being able to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 08:28:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322250#post322250</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322250#post322250</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Did anyone actually watch the thing?</q></p><p>Saw a bit and unfortunately JK was on a roll and I turned it off when as simon g said ....JK: BLAH BLAH BLAH, WHATEVER WHATEVER!<br />.....DC : We want to help the poor. (Boo groan groan from the front rows in the Audience)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 08:18:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jack Harrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322249#post322249</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322249#post322249</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						At the end of the day Nu Zilders will see there's nothing to see.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 08:16:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322248#post322248</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322248#post322248</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong> it reigns, it pours...</strong><br /><q>...they go into politics, <br />they rise like scum.<br />IMHO…</q><br />in some cases the froth becomes <br />the 'head' of the country...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 08:14:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>simon g</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322247#post322247</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322247#post322247</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I WATCHED IT AND I LEARNED HOW TO DEBATE.</p><p>I WIN THIS THREAD. WHATEVER.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 08:04:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322246#post322246</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322246#post322246</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I’ve been phoned to do a poll by Curia, David Farrar’s company so probably on behalf of National. The question that I found interesting was being asked to give scores to party leaders, with a list of Norman/Peters/Key/Cunliffe/English.</q></p><p>It included English? Interesting! Anything else you can recall?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 07:53:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322245#post322245</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322245#post322245</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t think O’Connor would be doing anything illegal if he had leaked Police video evidence to Slater, even if the motivation and morality involved is questionable. It’s certainly not a good look for the cops to be cosying up to a vile blogger…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 07:43:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322244#post322244</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322244#post322244</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Don’t forget The Press Leaders Debate is<br />Live on the web tonight from 7pm</p><p></q></p><p>Did anyone actually watch the thing?  Gave up after five minutes of Key and Cunliffe shouting over each other, which I'm sure was enormously entertaining if you were in the room but somewhat... unenlightening through not-great…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 07:34:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322243#post322243</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322243#post322243</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Are those two axes really important to you? </q></p><p>Well, if you could make sure you plot all the current election and polling data onto the surface of a four-dimensional hypercube in time for all of us to clarify our relative positions and make a properly informed voting decision before the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 07:29:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Carol Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322242#post322242</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322242#post322242</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And just as you can’t really judge how close stars are to each other by their apparent clustering to the naked eye, so you shouldn’t judge how close you are to a political party by how close they look on a flat projection. </q><br />That's a brilliant image, Ben. Love it.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 06:48:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322241#post322241</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322241#post322241</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And just as you can’t really judge how close stars are to each other by their apparent clustering to the naked eye,</q><br />I suppose you could call that the Z axis which in the case of what we are discussing would be the change over time (as distance over astronomical…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 02:54:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322238#post322238</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322238#post322238</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It would be interesting, since they collect the data, for them to report not just the two aggregated dimensions relative to you, but also the magnitude of your distance in all the dimensions (a single number) to the main parties</q><br />Not quite sure where you were going with that but…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 01:45:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322236#post322236</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322236#post322236</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I've probably said this more than often enough, but take care about reading a lot into an infographic like that. It's 2 dimensional. Which is better in some ways than 1 dimensional, but it's a whole lot less than the actual dimensions of our political opinions. Are those two axes…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sept 2014 00:38:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322221#post322221</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322221#post322221</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I’m a more than a little Catholic on these matters; he who is without sin etc.</q><br />To which sin do you refer?  Greed, Averace, Guutony, Sloth, wrath?, I could go the full seven but....  National can hardly claim to be worthy of casting a school play let alone stones.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 21:04:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322218#post322218</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322218#post322218</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q> __Not at all Paul. I made it public on Facebook so fair game for anyone in a sense, although disappointed the PM appeared to bring it up in his press conference – just a little higher profile than I expected! – which is why I did a brief press statement…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 20:46:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>anth</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322217#post322217</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322217#post322217</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I've been phoned to do a poll by Curia, David Farrar's company so probably on behalf of National. The question that I found interesting was being asked to give scores to party leaders, with a list of Norman/Peters/Key/Cunliffe/English.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 20:35:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ben Austin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322216#post322216</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322216#post322216</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The Maori Party need to show some signs of independence I think, if just to remind their voters and potential coalition partners that they are still a force to be reckoned with. If they retain two seats this time around this may give them quite a solid bargaining position, especially…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 20:32:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322213#post322213</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322213#post322213</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The dominant ideology in today’s US Republicans, by our standards, are a mutant hybrid of Colin Craig and Rodney Hide. And the Democrats, when all its various factions are taken into account, span the spectrum between National and Labour.</q><br />Nail meet head. I am hearing from the God botherers of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 20:06:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322212#post322212</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322212#post322212</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>He’s an animated masterclass in the art of misdirection.</q></p><p>Only because the suckers think it’s all about money so ignore the fact the guy just waffles.<br />Sound bites and suckers</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 20:04:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322209#post322209</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322209#post322209</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>he’s sort of making less and less sense?</q></p><p>Is he ever? I’d have quite liked to hear some coherent discussion on the issue, but John Key’s (argumentum ad absurdum) contribution on raising the minimum wage (<a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/10449997/Press-leaders-debate-2014-Live-tonight" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Press leaders debate 2014</a> was Taslovian):</p><p>“Make it $50! Make it $50!"<sarc></p><p>He’s an animated…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 19:52:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Parks</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322207#post322207</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322207#post322207</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> <em>I don’t think Labour does enough lefty stuff to be considered a centre-left party. I guess my impressions are still tainted by Rogernomics.</em></p><p>I don’t know where you fit a capital gains tax, for instance, into that perspective?</q></p><p>A capital gains tax is a completely centrist policy idea. I’m in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 19:46:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322205#post322205</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322205#post322205</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Exactly, although Republicans persist in labelling Democrats as pinko liberalists hell-bent on introducing some radical form of socialism, next stop the gulag for all “right” thinking gun-toting god-fearing citizens.</q></p><p>The dominant ideology in today's US Republicans, by our standards, are a mutant hybrid of Colin Craig and Rodney Hide. And…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 19:42:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322204#post322204</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322204#post322204</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> although disappointed the PM appeared to bring it up in his press conference – just a little higher profile than I expected! </q><br />You get that with juvenile bullies, expose a frailty or weakness, an Achilles heel, they will exploit it like a predator, they will stub a cigarette out in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 19:40:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322203#post322203</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322203#post322203</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The Native Affairs polls &mdash; which consistently show that Maori electorate voters would strongly prefer the Maori Party to go with Labour if there is a choice will presumably not be lost on them.</q></p><p>It may take a large slice of humble pie, in the form of electoral oblivion, to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 19:35:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322202#post322202</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322202#post322202</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Exactly, although Republicans persist in labelling Democrats as pinko liberalists hell-bent on introducing some radical form of socialism, next stop the gulag for all “right” thinking gun-toting god-fearing citizens.</q></p><p>Tussock beat me to posting up The Political Compass.  To my mind, it provides a much better way of looking at…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 19:31:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322201#post322201</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322201#post322201</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hey Russell. Nice <a href="http://www.3news.co.nz/politics/journos-soul-searching-after-latest-dirty-politics-leaks-2014090210?ref=video" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">interview this morning on Firstline</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 19:28:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322200#post322200</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322200#post322200</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Was discussing same with a recently elevated QC this morning and he believes that Odgers won't even want to come back to NZ anytime.</q></p><p>She's already done her civic duty by staying out of the country.</p><p><q>I would personally recommend Belfast as a good place to start. Her talents might…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 19:27:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322199#post322199</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322199#post322199</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Can we now say you have a dry wit?</q></p><p>:) Plus I'll add seeing as others are, Matthew your life is your business and I have no judgement of that but I have to say I was just deeply disappointed to hear a man with such a voice and opinion…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 19:25:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322194#post322194</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322194#post322194</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Not at all Paul. I made it public on Facebook so fair game for anyone in a sense</q></p><p>Can we now say you have a dry wit? </p><p></hat Style="got"></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 19:10:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322192#post322192</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322192#post322192</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>“personal statement from Matthew Hooten”<br />ahem – Hooton<br />“personal statement from Matthew Hooton”<br />in the interests of posterity…</q></p><p>I think my confusion might have arisen from a false memory of an imaginary one-hit wonder.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 19:01:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322191#post322191</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322191#post322191</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Not at all Paul. I made it public on Facebook so fair game for anyone in a sense, although disappointed the PM appeared to bring it up in his press conference – just a little higher profile than I expected! – which is why I did a brief press statement…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 18:47:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew  Hooton</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322189#post322189</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322189#post322189</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Not at all Paul.  I made it public on Facebook so fair game for anyone in a sense, although disappointed the PM appeared to bring it up in his press conference &ndash; just a little higher profile than I expected! &ndash; which is why I did a brief press statement…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 18:29:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mccx</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322187#post322187</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322187#post322187</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Both National and Labour are center left parties in the world sense and certainly in comparison to anything in the US.</q><br />I don’t know how one might make sense of the political orientation of parties globally, but among western democracies I would dispute that National would be to the left…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 18:10:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322183#post322183</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322183#post322183</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>The Greens seem to already have plenty of evidence-based policy – just not perhaps in the area you want it. They’re constantly smeared by the right as being economically ‘loony’ when they’ve had a coherent policy in that dimension for years now. I doubt adopting rationalist science positions will fix…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 17:51:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322181#post322181</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322181#post322181</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Everyone seems to accept that the Maori Party are firmly tucked into National’s back pocket come hell or high water. Is this a solidly based perception or would continuing revelations unglue them from their colonial masters?</q></p><p>The Native Affairs polls &mdash; which consistently show that Maori electorate voters would strongly…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 17:41:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James George</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322180#post322180</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322180#post322180</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Everyone seems to accept that the Maori Party are firmly tucked into National's back pocket come hell or high water.  Is this a solidly based perception or would continuing revelations unglue them from their colonial masters?</p><p>Turiana is leaving so there goes the Maori Party share of the Labour/Maori dislike.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 17:36:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Trevor Nicholls</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322178#post322178</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322178#post322178</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I think the traditional threat of "we know where yer live" is regarded as unlawyerly</q></p><p>So farewell, Cactus Kate<br />"Left wing c***s", that was your catchphrase<br />Now you have left yourself, be careful you don't get caught</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 17:31:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322166#post322166</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322166#post322166</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> kill off ACC and Pharmac</q></p><p>Most New Zealander's have NO IDEA how valuable both of these organisations are. They have combined to make it possible to run a first world health system on a third world budget.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 16:57:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322165#post322165</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322165#post322165</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>already have plenty of evidence-based policy</q></p><p>Yup I know, that’s why I said strongER.</p><p>Whereas for National I would have said get ANY evidence based policy.</p><p>But I also think they need to make a thing of it across the board. <br />eg Raising minimum wage because data from all these…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 16:52:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322164#post322164</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322164#post322164</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I think the traditional threat of "we know where yer live" is regarded as unlawyerly, even in Belfast.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 16:47:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lindsay Vette</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322163#post322163</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322163#post322163</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Oh, someone noted our “left” is left of the US, which is true, because the US left is in the same damn place as their right.</q></p><p>Exactly, although Republicans persist in labelling Democrats as pinko liberalists hell-bent on introducing some radical form of socialism, next stop the gulag for all…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 16:46:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>tussock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322161#post322161</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322161#post322161</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Is it just me, or is my perception of Labour as being basically a centre-right party that leans to the left correct?</q></p><p><a href="http://politicalcompass.org/nz2014" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://politicalcompass.org/nz2014</a></p><p>That's a long-term international view. It's the doohicky that one news ripped off, and then shifted National to the middle of. It rates the policies they intend…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 16:27:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>oga</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322159#post322159</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322159#post322159</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thank you, Bart. I suspect that part of the problem with the New Zealand electorate is that the labels that political parties wear don't quite stick on properly. I always felt that National and Labour were too similar in their policy base. I assumed that they were more right leaning…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 16:25:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322158#post322158</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322158#post322158</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It’s a shame people get stuck on that. Like Rogernomics ( although completely different ) really . Douglas and Prebble . They went on to become Act. But Labour wears the badge.</q><br />Perhaps Labour could play on that to the right wing.<br />** "Labour, the party that bought you free…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 16:21:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322157#post322157</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322157#post322157</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>That’s why I really really want The Greens to become much stronger on evidence based policy, it takes away the “fear of loonies” that is “forcing” the reasonable center voters to vote National.</q></p><p>I was dismayed when ACT’s was given Ministerial posts, for similar reasons.  In my mind it’s one…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 16:20:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322154#post322154</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322154#post322154</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The Greens seem to already have plenty of evidence-based policy – just not perhaps in the area you want it. They’re constantly smeared by the right as being economically ‘loony’ when they’ve had a coherent policy in that dimension for years now. I doubt adopting rationalist science positions will fix…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 16:00:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Phil Wallington</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322153#post322153</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322153#post322153</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hi Nick... As ever, I bow to your legal expertise. Was discussing same with a recently elevated QC this morning and he believes that Odgers won't even want to come back to NZ anytime. I suspect she will slink off to the UK and do a spot of legal hackery,…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 15:53:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Dismal Soyanz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322152#post322152</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322152#post322152</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Speaking of things hootin', if Hooton was not <em>embellishing</em>, the <a href="http://i.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/10450809/PM-department-to-absorb-Cera" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">PM's absorbing of CERA</a> is amusing. No need to pick up the phone to start an argument then. I feel a Monty Python sketch coming on...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 15:45:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322151#post322151</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322151#post322151</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the anti Labour/Greens rhetoric</q></p><p>The way I have been hearing it from my relatives is , they HAVE to vote National to avoid The Greens, who have been successfully tarred as wanting to drive us all back to the stone age. The logic is that a vote for Labour is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 15:45:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322150#post322150</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322150#post322150</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So if a right-leaning voter such at Matthew Hooten were to defect from National, where’s he going to go?</q></p><p>To me this is why it’s not enough just to investigate and prosecute those [allegedly] involved, or to tell everyone to vote them out.  Investigating stuff that's already happened won't necessarily…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 15:45:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322149#post322149</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322149#post322149</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Other right-leaning voters? Some could move to the Conservatives and some to NZ First, but for many it’s National or nothing, which may be why polls haven’t moved drastically.</q>In reality Labour aren't that far to the left of traditional National but the anti Labour/Greens rhetoric of the current government seems…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 15:20:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322146#post322146</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322146#post322146</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>hash tag team wrangle...</strong><br />Don't forget <em>The Press</em> Leaders Debate is <br /><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/10449997/Press-leaders-debate-2014-Live-tonight" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Live on the web</a> tonight from 7pm</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 15:12:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322142#post322142</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322142#post322142</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> which in reality are looking like being coalition partners, and the Greens might one day be the larger party.</q></p><p>They always have looked like they could work together and I doubt their policies are soo much the same ,it will be perfect because it’s about compromise. The Greens advantage is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 14:48:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322141#post322141</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322141#post322141</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t think O’Connor would be doing anything illegal if he had leaked Police video evidence to Slater</q></p><p>O'Connor is the head of the police staff union. He has no more right to share inquiry evidence than you or I do.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 14:47:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322140#post322140</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322140#post322140</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Is it just me</q></p><p>It's definitely not just you. Fair enough, I didn't really define the terms Left and Right, but I don't really want to either. Just wanted to say that the problem for National supporters who might actually be disgusted by the recent revelations is that there's just…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 14:43:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322137#post322137</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322137#post322137</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> is my perception of Labour as being basically a centre-right party that leans to the left correct? </q></p><p>No. </p><p>Or more accurately not in world terms. Seriously ACT might just get time of day as right wing in the US but even they would be slammed for some of their policies.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 14:37:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alfie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322135#post322135</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322135#post322135</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>No – this is a very widespread misconception. The conversation is quoted in Hager’s book, on page 46. It’s noted as “Cameron Slater, Facebook messaging to and from Judith Collins, 11 September 2011.”</q><br />Except Greg O'Connor's name is redacted in the book and he is only referred to as [a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 14:23:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Walter  Nicholls</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322134#post322134</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322134#post322134</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>we’ve gone from paying down debt and being indebted to the tune of (I haven’t checked exactly) something like 10 billion, to constantly borrowing and owing about 60 billion.</q></p><p>Perhaps someone clever than me can try and put this into perspective.  Annual revenue of NZ Government is about $60 billion.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 14:20:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322133#post322133</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322133#post322133</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Labour as being basically a centre-right party that leans to the left correct?</q></p><p>Personally I'm odd, because I don't look at left ,right centre. I see Labour as working class, middle of the road so their roots are still intact. I see  Greens advertising all over the Ponse and Herne…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 14:03:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322132#post322132</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322132#post322132</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Is it just me, or is my perception of Labour as being basically a centre-right party that leans to the left correct? I don’t think Labour does enough lefty stuff to be considered a centre-left party. I guess my impressions are still tainted by Rogernomics.</q></p><p>Yeah, Labour lurched across to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 13:58:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322131#post322131</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322131#post322131</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I don’t think Labour does enough lefty stuff to be considered a centre-left party. I guess my impressions are still tainted by Rogernomics.</q></p><p>I don't know where you fit a capital gains tax, for instance, into that perspective?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 13:53:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Roger Lacey</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322130#post322130</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322130#post322130</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Hooton ahem… oops. Won’t get that one wrong again.</q></p><p>Got to spell it correctly or it won't come up when they search the metadata.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 13:53:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>oga</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322129#post322129</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322129#post322129</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Is it just me, or is my perception of Labour as being basically a centre-right party that leans to the left correct? I don't think Labour does enough lefty stuff to be considered a centre-left party. I guess my impressions are still tainted by Rogernomics.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 13:47:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322128#post322128</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322128#post322128</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The economy thing annoys me</q></p><p><a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&amp;objectid=11317432" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> Peter Lyons at the Harold</a> puts things in perspective.</p><p>ETA The comments section suggests some people really don't understand satire or have a sense of humour.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 13:38:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322127#post322127</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322127#post322127</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Oh woops ,guess I didn't care enough. Hoot on
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 13:34:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Greg Dawson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322126#post322126</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322126#post322126</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>No – this is a very widespread misconception. The conversation is quoted in Hager’s book, on page 46. It’s noted as “Cameron Slater, Facebook messaging to and from Judith Collins, 11 September 2011.”</q></p><p>Ah, thankyou for clarifying. Also to nzlemming for telling me its UTC not localised time :)</p><p>I’m…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 13:32:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322125#post322125</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322125#post322125</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Although it got me thinking: it feels like there just aren’t enough credible centre-right parties around.</q></p><p>I think the problem is more that there aren't any credible far right parties. So National is actually stuck there, and it's not to their advantage. It's hard to even claim to be center…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 13:30:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322124#post322124</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322124#post322124</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>No – this is a very widespread misconception. The conversation is quoted in Hager’s book, on page 46. It’s noted as “Cameron Slater, Facebook messaging to and from Judith Collins, 11 September 2011.”</q></p><p>Correct, and the timestamp information is important if you remember that FB stamps everything with UTC which…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 13:19:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bob daktari</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322123#post322123</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322123#post322123</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I think people need to say national have done a terrible job of managing the economy &ndash; lets not beat about the bush or rely on a natural disaster to make the books look better than they would
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 13:18:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Angela Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322122#post322122</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322122#post322122</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I'm not saying that National have handled the economy badly but</q></p><p>I can't get over the frequent references to the state Labour left the economy in when  we've gone from paying down debt and being indebted to the tune of (I haven't checked exactly) something like 10 billion, to constantly…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 13:11:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322121#post322121</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322121#post322121</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The economy thing annoys me. ...<br />I’m not saying that National have handled the economy badly but it feels like any muppet could’ve take the NZ economy out of recession following global financial crisis.</q><br />Hooton et al will quote figures when it suits, but the persistent mantra, whether it's him,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 13:08:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael Meyers</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322120#post322120</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322120#post322120</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<strong>Hooton</strong> ahem... oops. Won't get that one wrong again.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 13:03:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322119#post322119</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322119#post322119</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Hooton</q></p><p>Thank you.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 13:02:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael Meyers</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322118#post322118</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322118#post322118</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The economy thing annoys me. National has claimed credit for all the good things in the past 6 years, blamed all the bad things on the GFC, and conveniently everything before the 2008 election was Labour's fault rather than the GFC. I'm surprised they have got away with that spin.…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 13:01:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322117#post322117</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322117#post322117</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>"personal statement from Matthew Hooten"</em><br />ahem &ndash; <strong>Hooton</strong><br />"personal statement from Matthew <strong>Hooton</strong>"<br />in the interests of posterity...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 13:00:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mccx</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322114#post322114</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322114#post322114</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Hooten specifically? It's either National or ACT. As he says, his ideological preferences outweigh <em>Dirty Politics</em> and related issues. </p><p> Other right-leaning voters?  Some could move to the Conservatives and some to NZ First, but for many it's National or nothing, which may be why polls haven't moved drastically.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 12:45:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322113#post322113</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322113#post322113</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So if a right-leaning voter such at Matthew Hooten were to defect from National, where’s he going to go? He’s not likely to cross the fence to Labour or the Greens, is he?</q></p><p>When Mark Sainsbury asked Hooten why he'd be voting National despite his having just clobbered Michelle Boag…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 12:41:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael Meyers</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322112#post322112</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322112#post322112</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Just read the <a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1409/S00028/personal-statement-by-matthew-hooton.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">personal statement from Matthew Hooten</a>. </p><p>It reads a bit like an example of Stockholm Syndrome. National and Act have both been naughty but he's voting for them anyway.</p><p>Although it got me thinking: it feels like there just aren't enough credible centre-right parties around. If I had…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 12:36:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322111#post322111</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322111#post322111</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Agreed, the fb leaks are a new front unsupported by Hagers book – need someone to tell us whether we can just ignore all the fb ones as forgeries, or if it really is as bad as they make it out.</q></p><p>No – this is a very widespread misconception. The…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 12:01:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Littlewood*</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322110#post322110</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322110#post322110</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks to all for good information on this thread. </p><p>Has anyone else noticed that as time rolls on, and the back-room players start retreating, leaving front man Key alone and blinking in the lime-light, that he's sort of making less and less sense? (I mean, even less than usual) Phrases…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 11:55:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Dismal Soyanz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322109#post322109</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322109#post322109</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Also, the timestamps are a thing – are ministers really able to stay up past midnight chatting all the time and still do their job?</q></p><p>Kinda depends on how you define their "job". (Nobody told me that wasn't part of the job! I utterly refute that! Let's talk about policy...)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 11:44:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322108#post322108</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322108#post322108</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Agreed, the fb leaks are a new front unsupported by Hagers book – need someone to tell us whether we can just ignore all the fb ones as forgeries, or if it really is as bad as they make it out.Also, the timestamps are a thing – are ministers really…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 11:35:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322106#post322106</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322106#post322106</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the fb leaks are a new front unsupported by Hagers book</q></p><p>Are you sure &ndash; I thought his book had plenty of Facebook-sourced evidence?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 11:25:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Greg Dawson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322104#post322104</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322104#post322104</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Given that Slater and Collins are both outright denying all/any facebook discussions, it is likely to be necessary to use legal channels to check validity/veracity here.</q></p><p>Agreed, the fb leaks are a new front unsupported by Hagers book &ndash; need someone to tell us whether we can just ignore all…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 11:17:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322097#post322097</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322097#post322097</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Whereas Key continues in denial of his own ‘problems<br />’<br />"Anyway, what they tell you when you give up drinking is ’you feel better, you sleep better and you have greater clarity of thought . . .So, after three weeks what I tell you is that’s bulls***."</p><p>&ndash; dry drunks…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 10:50:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Angela Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322096#post322096</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322096#post322096</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>I don’t have any problem with the investigating parties pulling facebook chat records (if they exist, via normal legal channels) to definitively prove whether or not the released chats are forgeries. That doesn’t feel like overreach and privacy violation to me – just normal investigative functions as a response to…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 10:50:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322094#post322094</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322094#post322094</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>- dry drunks can be so bitter!</q></p><p>Akshully, when I think about that, I can't recall, because that's what the people of New Zealand want, they want economy and I refute that,,,,,, hic.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 10:34:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322093#post322093</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322093#post322093</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>which explains some of Boag’s comments as well. Who needs enemies..</q></p><p>Indeed. I didn't know this background and the mention up thread seemed a little unnecessary.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 10:29:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Brent Jackson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322092#post322092</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322092#post322092</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>3: it’s about now presumably that Collins (and hopefully Key) is busily recognising that metadata is actually kinda intrinsically related to the content it describes, and that its collection and use for investigative purposes is actually something to be concerned about</q></p><p>A wry observation</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 10:21:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Aston</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322084#post322084</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322084#post322084</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So, three things: 1. Long time lurker, first time caller: please be gentle.</p><p>You fool! Now they know you’re here!</p><p>Welcome Teej</q></p><p>Yes welcome Teej and as NZ Lemming said, you are now tagged. <br />You know that bit when the dictator takes over and they <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martyred_Intellectuals_Memorial" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">round up the intellectuals</a> to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 10:02:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322083#post322083</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322083#post322083</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>...his self disclosed alcoholism is what John Key was referring to in the ‘problems Matthew has’ comment.</q><br />Whereas Key continues in denial of <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/10359322/John-Key-says-booze-free-benefits-bulls" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">his own 'problems'</a> <br /><q>Anyway, what they tell you when you give up drinking is 'you feel better, you sleep better and you have greater clarity of thought…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 10:02:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Aston</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322082#post322082</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322082#post322082</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I am getting paranoid now . Been reading about <a href="http://www.truthliesdeceptioncoverups.info/2013/05/spotting-spin-some-tricks-of-trade.html " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">spin doctor techniques</a> <br />This <br />The most recent email release that lead to the PM sacking Collins as a minister was released by Slater &ndash; via Cathy Odgers in league with the PMs dept as a reverse straw man diversionary tactic.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 09:57:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322078#post322078</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322078#post322078</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the ‘problems Matthew has’ </q></p><p>which explains some of Boag's comments as well. Who needs enemies..</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 09:43:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alfie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322076#post322076</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322076#post322076</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The thlot pickens! An interesting little item on stuff reports that the purchaser of Hotchin's monument to self-regard on Paratai Drive is the NZ CEO of Orovida...</q><br />Here's the link (on Stuff):<br /><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/8981806/Hotchins-mansion-on-brink-of-sale" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/8981806/Hotchins-mansion-on-brink-of-sale</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 09:38:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322068#post322068</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322068#post322068</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>3 monkeys…</strong><br /><q>…remember, Peter Dunne resigned his ministerial post last year because he refused to fully cooperate with the inquiry into the leaking… </q><br />If it works once try it again, now Dunne <br />is <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/10448657/Dunne-won-t-read-muck-raking-Dirty-Politics" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">refusing to read <em>Dirty Politics</em></a><br />What a representative!<br />Ohariu and environs must be so proud of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 09:12:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Greg Dawson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322067#post322067</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322067#post322067</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Agreed. The idea of extraordinary powers being deployed to identify leakers is not good for democracy.</q></p><p>See I didn't think identifying the leakers was what was being suggested. </p><p>I don't have any problem with the investigating parties pulling facebook chat records (if they exist, via normal legal channels) to definitively…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 09:10:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322066#post322066</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322066#post322066</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>PM’s Pinot has been around for a few years, so I don’t think that’s been much of a secret. But the blind trust is evidently only blind in one eye</q></p><p>Why though? PM has mentioned the Pinot often albeit not lately. How blind can the blind trust be  if he…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 09:10:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322065#post322065</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322065#post322065</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And as if on cue, Labour has asked the police to investigate various matters.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 08:54:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322063#post322063</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322063#post322063</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>__I am ignorant of the law, but I would have thought that if there was anyone with the resources and legal authority to require the logs from the third party in this (Facebook) for a conversation at a known time and date, it would be the Inspector General of the…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 08:43:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Amanda Wreckonwith</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322057#post322057</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322057#post322057</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>'Necessary, reasonable? Public domain?'</p><p>Check his twitter feed.  It seems that Matthew thinks that his self disclosed alcoholism is what John Key was referring to in the 'problems Matthew has' comment.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 07:44:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322054#post322054</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322054#post322054</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I think I can see a pattern here and it ain’t no fucking butterfly. More like roadkill.</q></p><p>Rorschach's journal, September 1st 2014: Whale carcass in alley this morning, tire tread on burst stomach.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 03:01:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>stever@cs.waikato.ac.nz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322053#post322053</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322053#post322053</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Whoever said the rich have no style (was that me just then?? :) ) was spot on, clearly.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 02:21:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322052#post322052</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322052#post322052</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>We’ll done Matthew [and stuff] </q></p><p>Necessary, reasonable? Public domain?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 02:11:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hebe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322050#post322050</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322050#post322050</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>PM’s Pinot has been around for a few years, so I don’t think that’s been much of a secret. But the blind trust is evidently only blind in one eye.</q></p><p>You are right: didn't look at the date: 101 not achieved. As you were.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 01:16:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322049#post322049</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322049#post322049</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>In Alan Moore’s graphic novel ‘Watchmen’, one of the vigilantes has the pseudonym ‘Rorschach’.</q><br />I think I can see a pattern here and it ain't no fucking butterfly. More like roadkill.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 01:00:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Trevor Nicholls</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322047#post322047</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322047#post322047</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						PM's Pinot has been around for a few years, so I don't think that's been much of a secret. But the blind trust is evidently only blind in one eye.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 00:09:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322046#post322046</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322046#post322046</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So, three things: 1. Long time lurker, first time caller: please be gentle. </q></p><p>You fool! Now they know you're here!</p><p>Welcome Teej</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sept 2014 00:08:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hebe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322044#post322044</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322044#post322044</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Dunno if I’m just getting over-wrought here – this on  Key’s blind trust interests is gobs-smacking. That is, if gobs hadn’t already been repeatedly smacked in the past two weeks.<br /> <a href="http://www.3news.co.nz/general/pms-stake-in-otago-vineyard-revealed-2010052617" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.3news.co.nz/general/pms-stake-in-otago-vineyard-revealed-2010052617</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 23:42:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Geoff Lealand</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322039#post322039</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322039#post322039</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Welcome
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 23:02:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322038#post322038</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322038#post322038</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The underlying character flaw is millenia old &ndash; acting as if the ends always justify the means. Moral grown-ups apply better judgement than that.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 23:01:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322037#post322037</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322037#post322037</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						kia ora.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 22:57:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322036#post322036</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322036#post322036</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> but at least he’s now a sober one. We’ll done Matthew on giving up the booze.</q></p><p>Doesn't change anything tho' nor would I judge him on whether he drinks or not. It's more the crap I think he spouts outta his trap.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 22:56:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Teej</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322035#post322035</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322035#post322035</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						So, three things: 1. Long time lurker, first time caller: please be gentle. 2. The dirty politics revelations have illustrated, I think, a wider malaise/hubris within this government, which is that convention, process, the Cabinet Manual and all those other things that we take for granted to keep NZ politics…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 22:27:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322033#post322033</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322033#post322033</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>...be careful what you wish for...</p><p>Actually what I expressly <strong>do not</strong> wish is that they just ask the NSA because as a communication between two non-US citizens via an American company the NSA will have a copy.</p><p>what I would wish is that, if the defence is that it…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 21:50:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322032#post322032</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322032#post322032</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>if it’s been mentioned before</q><br /><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/10417726/The-hacker-revealed" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Snap!</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 21:50:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>SteveH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322029#post322029</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322029#post322029</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>As we know, ‘Rawshark’ is the pseudonym of the anonymous e-mail leaker.</p><p>In Alan Moore’s graphic novel ‘Watchmen’, one of the vigilantes has the pseudonym ‘Rorschach’. </q></p><p>I thought of that too. The wikipeida page for the comic <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rorschach_%28comics%29" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">character</a> says "he is introduced as the only remaining active masked vigilante not…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 21:30:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322026#post322026</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322026#post322026</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>I am ignorant of the law, but I would have thought that if there was anyone with the resources and legal authority to require the logs from the third party in this (Facebook) for a conversation at a known time and date, it would be the Inspector General of the…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 21:21:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322025#post322025</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322025#post322025</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>In Alan Moore’s graphic novel ‘Watchmen’, one of the vigilantes has the pseudonym ‘Rorschach’</q></p><p>Hrrm</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 21:21:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Trevor Nicholls</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322024#post322024</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322024#post322024</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the JK portrait hangs in his boardroom</q></p><p>Not an employee, not an executive, but certainly The Great Benefactor.<br />Perhaps it was auctioned off for one of NZ's leading "charities"?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 21:13:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322023#post322023</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322023#post322023</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Hooten shooten What a dickwad.</q></p><p>Hooten. Yeah right. The <a href="http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-mandela/?p=302690#post302690" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">fan dance on Mandela’s coffin</a> guy.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 21:11:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Geoff Lealand</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322020#post322020</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322020#post322020</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Minor correction (in the spirit of the times ): the story was on the NZH site and the JK portrait hangs in his boardroom.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 20:59:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322019#post322019</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322019#post322019</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>By the way, I don't know if it's been mentioned before, but a very minor nugget of possible interest:</p><p>As we know, 'Rawshark' is the pseudonym of the anonymous e-mail leaker.</p><p>In Alan Moore's graphic novel 'Watchmen', one of the vigilantes has the pseudonym 'Rorschach'.  At one point in the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 20:59:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Just thinking</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322017#post322017</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322017#post322017</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Colins isn't the Attorney General, but this ugly business does undermine the fabric of our legal system. </p><p>A Constitutional crisis in a country without a constitution or firm rules for appointing Judges. </p><p><a href="https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/about/judges/appointments" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/about/judges/appointments</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 20:56:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Geoff Lealand</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322016#post322016</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322016#post322016</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The thlot pickens!   An interesting little item on stuff reports that the purchaser of Hotchin's monument to self-regard on Paratai Drive is the NZ CEO of Orovida, who reputedly has a portrait of John Key hanging in his new abode.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 20:53:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Euan Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322015#post322015</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322015#post322015</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Any claim that this sentence is a forgery is a forgery.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 20:47:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>tussock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322014#post322014</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322014#post322014</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I have no recall of being born on Earth. So I presume I was born on Mars unless proven otherwise.</p><p><br />I have no recall of writing that either. So I presume it to be a forgery unless proven otherwise.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 20:38:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Amanda Wreckonwith</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322013#post322013</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322013#post322013</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I agree he is sometimes a dickwad but at least he's now a sober one. <br />We'll done Matthew on giving up the booze. <br />I think you'll find us lefties are more accepting of any personal demons than your chosen leader seems to be.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 20:37:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322007#post322007</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322007#post322007</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>…unless proven otherwise...</p><p>I am ignorant of the law, but I would have thought that if there was anyone with the resources and legal authority to  require the logs from the third party in this (Facebook) for a conversation at a known time and date, it would be the Inspector…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 19:57:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322005#post322005</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322005#post322005</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1409/S00028/personal-statement-by-matthew-hooton.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> Hooten shooten</a> What a dickwad.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 19:42:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322004#post322004</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=322004#post322004</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Canon fodder…</q></p><p>Loose Canons?  They do appear to be rolling around all over the gundeck of the good ship National, causing all sorts of chaos.</p><p>Although 'loose Canons' sounds more like something you might get after eating the bad parts of your Curate's egg.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 19:27:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=321998#post321998</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=321998#post321998</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>sustained loss of traction</q></p><p>indeed</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 18:57:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Euan Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=321995#post321995</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=321995#post321995</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>With everyone else, Palmer, the opposition, even Hooton, calling for a proper wide ranging and independent inquiry, do you think Key can still avoid it? Surely he has to capitulate, which would mean it’ll happen after the election. If not, it shows up some of the issues we have with…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 18:52:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>R A Hurley</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=321994#post321994</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=321994#post321994</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I just read the DHC column in the herald suggesting that Cathy Odgers is lovely (and kind of skating over CO sniggering about someone’s potential murder).</q><br />It's a doozy, isn't it! She's just a "naughty girl" who indulges in "stirring" when bored! What an adorable little scamp she is, ruining…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 18:44:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Amanda Wreckonwith</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=321993#post321993</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=321993#post321993</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I thought the 'Goss' on Chaston was redacted in the the whaledump  documents...<br />Interesting that Stuff chose to release it. <br />Lower standards?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 18:26:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=321991#post321991</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=321991#post321991</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Indeed. What does it say, though, about Key that a day after he sacks a Minister to get on message, she's back off message?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 18:22:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alfie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=321990#post321990</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=321990#post321990</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Good grief! <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/10447644/Bloggers-targeted-business-journalist" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bernard Hickey became a target</a> for Slater, Odgers and Graham when he was setting up his non-profit journalism site. This quote from Odgers echoes her now familiar tone.<br /><q>This new website is a vehicle for the left. ... a one stop SuperBlog of whining high-pitched left-wing c<strong></strong> calling…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 18:09:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Farrell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=321989#post321989</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=321989#post321989</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And boots, and gags, and dog leads...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 18:09:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=321988#post321988</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=321988#post321988</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Remarkable lack of judgment! Sacked from Cabinet and surely advised to get out of the media, Ms Collins heads to twitter? Does National have whips?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 18:04:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=321983#post321983</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=321983#post321983</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Oh dear</q><br />She sounds so sure of herself…<br /><q> Judith Collins ‏@JudithCollinsMP  22m<br />@avancenz I have no recall nor any record of any such conversation. So I presume them to be forgeries unless proven otherwise.</q><br /><em>…unless proven otherwise</em><br />ha ha ha…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 17:44:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>simon g</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=321980#post321980</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-why-we-thought-what-we-thought/?p=321980#post321980</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Here's Key's problem:</p><p>Collins can be sacked from Cabinet. But not from Twitter.</p><p><a href="https://twitter.com/JudithCollinsMP/status/506301025041408000" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://twitter.com/JudithCollinsMP/status/506301025041408000</a></p><p>Oh dear.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sept 2014 17:19:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
