<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Hard News: To be expected</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310927#post310927</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310927#post310927</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>the lad is for turning...</strong><br /><q>There will be some here happy to see him go</q><br />I am &ndash; he's a loose cannon...<br />The Easter epiphany?<br /> &ndash; the ugly duckling wakes up to find he's a swine not a swan?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 19:43:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310923#post310923</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310923#post310923</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Te Tai Tokerau. Kelvin is currently a list MP. If you are enrolled there you can vote Hone for the electorate and labour party and get two reps :)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 19:30:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310920#post310920</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310920#post310920</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yeah I''ll vote for him if he's my electorate. Will be living up there by September.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 18:44:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310919#post310919</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310919#post310919</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Kelvin Davis #yay
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 18:38:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310918#post310918</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310918#post310918</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						So who gets the position?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 18:28:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310917#post310917</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310917#post310917</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Well, Labour will be gobsmacked<a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=11242350" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> right now!!</a><br />There will be some here happy to see him go.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 18:20:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310916#post310916</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310916#post310916</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Nice to see Shane from Labour is getting support from a Tory . :)</q></p><p>Who's more gobsmacked? The Blue team finding out one of their card-carrying members has donated to a Red, or the other way round?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 18:17:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310909#post310909</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310909#post310909</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Nice to see Shane from Labour is getting <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&amp;objectid=11241914" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> support from a Tory</a> . :)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 16:05:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310850#post310850</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310850#post310850</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Post at The Standard <a href="thestandard.org.nz/its-the-little-things/">adds some details</a>, including transcript. </p><p>Collins wants us to believe she understood "after the dinner" to mean the same evening rather than any later time. And that it was coincidence she corrected this misinterpretation after parliament could no longer ask her about it for a couple…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:54:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310849#post310849</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310849#post310849</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Putting the Lethe in lethargy...</strong><br /><q> Unseemly whinging on Radio NZ </q><br />Should she be in Parliament, let alone a Minister, if she can't understand questions on the hop?<br />As well as having the creepy creeping memory loss that is seemingly epidemic in the National seats... her fall back to the tired…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:44:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310845#post310845</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310845#post310845</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Judith Collins likening her last few weeks to the 'Salem witch hunt</q></p><p>Unseemly whinging <a href="http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/morningreport/audio/2593246/collins-says-oravida-affair-has-turned-into-a-witch-hunt" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">on Radio NZ</a> (4m audio)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:30:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310844#post310844</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310844#post310844</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>dunking garner...</strong><br />I hear Judith Collins likening her last few weeks to the 'Salem witch hunt' ...</p><p>Respectfully I'd counsel that she did most of the 'ducking' herself!</p><p>Innocence is shown by sinking,<br />&ndash; guilt if you are a floater...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:27:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310841#post310841</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310841#post310841</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Hard to know what decision processes are used for List appointments. </q></p><p>a weakness in the current implementation, yes &ndash; but the concept of voters responding to lists that more accurately reflect the population than FPP did is easily borne out by the faces in parliament now compared with 20 years…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 07:56:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310840#post310840</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310840#post310840</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>solely comprised of List MPs?</q></p><p>who asked for that?<br />#strawmanmuch</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 07:54:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310839#post310839</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310839#post310839</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The Greens QE policy was about monetary policy — it just used Christchurch as a handy sink for all the money they were printing. It didn’t actually mean there’d be any more money spent, or any money spent sooner. It was quite a cynical ploy, I think.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 00:42:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310838#post310838</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310838#post310838</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I question fat Government management and media salaries which are draining precious funds from electorate infrastructure and essential services. See it in Christchurch rebuild.</q></p><p>Or to put it succinctly... graft.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 00:29:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>debunk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310836#post310836</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310836#post310836</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>@Sacha<br />Do we really want to have a government solely comprised of List MPs?<br />I think not.   Need some accountability to electorates, provision of electorate services, personal investment in the community served etc.   NZ needs some sort of FPP for transparency and community connection.  I question fat Government management and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 22:17:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310832#post310832</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310832#post310832</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Good egg Sir ;-)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 20:32:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310831#post310831</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310831#post310831</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>its Easter so don't egg me on</q></p><p>wouldn't dreme of it</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 20:25:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310830#post310830</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310830#post310830</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>adden dumb</em></p><p>How could I forget the others?<br />ACT, Prebble just calls out “Anybody there?” and its first up best dressed…<br />Untied Furniture is easy…. “Can you do hair?”<br />As for The Conservatines ” Hi, I’m Colin and this….  is my friend Craig”</p><p>No wonder I have problems with people…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 20:19:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310829#post310829</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310829#post310829</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Hard to know what decision processes are used for List appointments.</q><br />Varies from party to party but in the case of National I wouldn't be surprised if money was involved, geez, even their leader you can rent by the meal and as for Collins, probably the hour. Labour would tend…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 20:07:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>debunk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310824#post310824</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310824#post310824</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Harder to be elected -and more expensive &ndash; and probably more democratic because stats can be gathered etc. on voters, gender, socioeconomic status etc.   Hard to know what decision processes are used for List appointments.   One always suspects the New Zealand tradition of jobs for friends and apprentices &ndash; particularly…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 19:14:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310823#post310823</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310823#post310823</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Someday son…</q><br />Farp...<br />I used to have one of those for sewing leather or some times sails.<br />'Twas made by a company called "Thrillavit'.<br />I lost it though but...<br />Oh how I yearn for the Thrillavit awl.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 19:08:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310822#post310822</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310822#post310822</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>“She’ll be awl right Mate”</q><br /><a href="http://24.media.tumblr.com/4cc1978ae41652521ae59bb050fbf097/tumblr_n1xh7pku9w1qz802uo1_500.png" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Someday son...</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 18:54:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310820#post310820</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310820#post310820</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Under MMP, an electorate MP is no more deserving than a list one. The sooner silly FPP thinking like that dies out, the better.</q><br />Ah but...<br />perception is everything in politics, as Collins is about to discover, and perception is personal, it can and often does, defy both truth and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 18:18:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310819#post310819</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310819#post310819</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>need to get elected rather than rely on the List</q></p><p>Under MMP, an electorate MP is no more deserving than a list one. The sooner silly FPP thinking like that dies out, the better.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 17:54:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>debunk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310817#post310817</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310817#post310817</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Let's hope you're right Steve.   Good article by Hugh Pavletich today "New Zealand's Bubble Economy Is Vulnerable" .. that's the problem here and neither Mana nor the Maori Party have any firepower to avoid it ..and Labour just looks so weak.  Not to say similar problems in UK and Australia.…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 17:33:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310816#post310816</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310816#post310816</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>and the current Green crop of list MPs is smarter and younger than the Labour lot, manyof whom should retire and get some fresh ..?? (brains, attitudes, energy, knowhow).. in there. Sad situation as I see it at the moment. Greens also need to get elected rather than rely on…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 17:31:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310815#post310815</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310815#post310815</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the Greens will do what it takes,</q><br />As did the Maori Party.<br />Labour NEED the Greens? Not quite.<br />Labour would appreciate the Greens support, the Greens would have less power under National than Labour, the greens NEED Labour.<br />If the expected backlash against National is sizable then Labour could govern…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 17:25:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>debunk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310812#post310812</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310812#post310812</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						As one of the first Green Elected counsellors in Local Government I don't feel that I am being especially Mean or Sickening..the Greens will do what it takes, and they are not the Party of a decade ago (which in some ways is a good thing).  Not meaning to stir…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 17:10:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310810#post310810</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310810#post310810</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>There are some clever people in the Greens compared with current Labour leftovers, and they should be in more senior positions .. which they won’t get with Labour but might get with National.</q><br />Don't even consider thinking about postulating the possibility that anything closely resembling that eventuality could ever be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 15:51:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310809#post310809</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310809#post310809</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Suspect the folk flooded out again in Christchurch would be happy with any fund raising method to speed up relief!</q></p><p>Seeing as we are in the<a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&amp;objectid=11241037#comment-form" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> South Island</a>, this guy seems a tad disillusioned and rightfully so.<br />Some of the comments though are just mean.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 15:37:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>debunk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310808#post310808</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310808#post310808</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Suspect the folk flooded out again in Christchurch would be happy with any fund raising method to speed up relief!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 14:31:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>debunk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310807#post310807</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310807#post310807</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						There are some clever people in the Greens compared with current Labour leftovers, and they should be in more senior positions .. which they won't get with Labour but might get with National.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 14:29:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310806#post310806</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310806#post310806</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Greens are not really that "left" &ndash; their view of economics is pretty conventional</q></p><p>that must be why they are still getting stick from the Nats for suggesting earthquake bonds, eh</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 13:49:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>debunk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310805#post310805</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310805#post310805</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Suspect Greens would be more likely to get Ministerial positions with National (if Hon Dunne can get away with making up silly laws and behaving badly) ..Greens are not really that "left" &ndash; their view of economics is pretty conventional in the current world banking and business climate where all…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 13:44:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310804#post310804</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310804#post310804</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>...past your eyes</q><br /><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-2CKsaq5r8" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-2CKsaq5r8</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 11:19:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310803#post310803</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310803#post310803</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The silver haired Collins is full on creaming it I reckon,<br />In her dark blue top she is the standard we have come to expect from those lightweight pale blues who wish to skim Dotcom and his (m)ilk.<br />You are spoiled Collins,<br />Curd anyone believe yougot a whey with it…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 11:08:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310799#post310799</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310799#post310799</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Whey to go,...</strong><br /><q>Like the rest of those moody blues….<br />You got to go now, go now, go now…..</q><br />I'm loving the 'Mooey' Blues...</p><p>We'd best be careful not to get Collins' goat,<br />in case we end up with a fatty lipid...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 07:42:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310785#post310785</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310785#post310785</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Or......<br />Border Guard Oravida baby,<br />Why can't you tell me his name?<br />From Iron Lady lookalike to Iron Butterfly sound alike.<br />This Lady is not for tuning and not returning either,<br />Like the rest of those moody blues....<br />You got to go now, go now, go now, if you don't…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 12:47:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310781#post310781</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310781#post310781</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>La Vida 'Orror'...</strong><br /><q>Just had to get it out there </q><br />Brill..</p><p>a veritable 'dairy air'<br />for Collins to sing<br />(out her derriere?)</p><p>Loco Motive Breath<br />fits the shuffling madness, <br />of the all time loser, too</p><p>Her Iron Lady<br />is rusting in the heat<br />and heading off the tracks...</p><p>Farmer Joe…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 07:12:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310779#post310779</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310779#post310779</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Labour and Greens have it in the bag Man...<br />Sing along with me...<br />Oravida Border  Guarder baby,<br />Why can't you tell me his name?<br /><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIVe-rZBcm4" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIVe-rZBcm4</a><br />Well that was fun...<br />Just had to get it out there eh?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2014 22:52:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310459#post310459</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310459#post310459</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And why is Deborah Manning on the team now? What is that about?</q></p><p>to give us hope :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 21:47:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310457#post310457</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310457#post310457</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>shafted the Greens ( twice)</q></p><p>Greens weren't offering the right numbers at least one of those times. Labour didn't handle the negotiations honourably from what I heard, but hopefully we're all past that.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 21:47:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jason Kemp</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310447#post310447</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310447#post310447</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I think many who used to vote Labour are already voting Green. Based on the performance of the Green party over the last few years I would expect them to largely keep their 15ish % of the vote and maybe even do better. </p><p>I get why Labour won't do a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 17:11:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310437#post310437</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310437#post310437</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=11237567" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Granny says</a> Cunliffe did the right thing. It's only one perspective though.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 15:40:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310415#post310415</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310415#post310415</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The media desperately need a narrative supplied, or they are forced to invent their own</q><br />Well yes, because the Media are a bunch of apologists for National or totally incapable of actual Journalism or both.<br />Which I must say is not  a fact but not far from it. There are…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:53:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310403#post310403</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310403#post310403</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Really thought McCarten could offer better advice.</q></p><p>He probably has &ndash; likely &ndash; it may not be sinking in.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 08:24:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310379#post310379</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310379#post310379</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>That's a great interview with Winston Peters.</p><p>He's aged a bit since <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oM8H5FxFJxY" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the 2011 version</a>, although some of the themes are the same.  The exchange at 9:45 onwards ("let the devil take the hindmost", etc) is fascinating.</p><p>Peters says that 32 of 38 National MPs approached him to challenge Jim…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2014 08:42:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310373#post310373</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310373#post310373</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>That's a big call. It might be better during that term, but my feeling is that it would implode by the next election, punishing both parties severely. In National's case, that would be a big hooray, but the destruction of the Green Party is probably not worth the concessions they…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2014 00:11:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310362#post310362</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310362#post310362</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="https://theconversation.com/the-australian-labor-party-and-the-pitfalls-of-the-politics-of-avoidance-25326" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Here's an interesting piece</a> from Geoff Gallop about the Labor collapse in WA recently.</p><p><q> the Australian Labor Party is a good case study in this politics of avoidance. Its membership base has all but collapsed, its primary vote is at a historic low and its constitution is corporatist and constraining.…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2014 18:40:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310354#post310354</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310354#post310354</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Excellent comment, Craig.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2014 14:10:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310353#post310353</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310353#post310353</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>A National-Greens government would be far better for the country than a National-NZF govt.</q></p><p>That's a big call. It might be better during that term, but my feeling is that it would implode by the next election, punishing both parties severely. In National's case, that would be a big hooray,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2014 14:04:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310352#post310352</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310352#post310352</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I think the Greens should initiate talks with National at least to prove to Labour they can’t be taken for granted. </q></p><p>I don't think they can, given their positioning for quite some time as going with Labour. And I don't think the membership would go with it. But...</p><p><q>tbh I…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2014 13:59:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310351#post310351</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310351#post310351</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I mean, there was no way Labour was ever going to buy the “let’s have a formal pre-election alliance” deal on offer</q></p><p>How would you know for sure until you made the offer? It's worth a try.</p><p><q>to act as if the rejection is a grand insult is, frankly, precious.</q>…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2014 13:46:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310350#post310350</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310350#post310350</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Given the view that it’s apparently an absolute no-brainer, I’m trying to find someone who has actually been saying so all along. Still looking.</q></p><p>Presumably you're talking about major bloggers rather than commentators, but <a href="http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-spring-timing/?p=307312#post307312" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">I said it month ago</a>. But saying it "all along" wouldn't be that rational, if you…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2014 13:33:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310342#post310342</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310342#post310342</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What about ‘traffic light coalitions’ that might conceivably include Labour, the Greens and New Zealand First? </q></p><p>In Bryce Edwards' <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/election-2014/news/article.cfm?c_id=1503581&amp;objectid=11223690" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> live chat with Winston</a> yesterday, Winston said what he felt about the Greens and it wasn't bad .</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2014 10:27:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310340#post310340</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310340#post310340</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Oh, and here are some references for consultation: </p><p>Charles Lees: The Red/Green Coalition in Germany: Politics, Personalities and Power: Manchester: Palgrave: 2000.</p><p>Werner Reutter: Germany on the Road to Normalcy: Politics and Policies of the Red/Green Federal Government: 1998-2002 Manchester: Palgrave: 2004</p><p>Franko Zelko and Caroline Brinkman: Green Parties: Reflections…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2014 10:04:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310339#post310339</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310339#post310339</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Here's an overview of how social democratic/green/anti-market populist party coalitions have worked out from an international perspective (an excerpt from a forthcoming Gaynz.Com article on the issue):</p><p><br />I must also admit that frankly, I find remarks from some political commentators that a Labour/Green coalition would be unstable or unworkable either…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2014 10:00:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310312#post310312</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310312#post310312</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						So does Rob Salmond, for that matter. As far as I can tell no Labour linked figures have come out in support of the idea, which, well, is probably the most unanimous they've been on a strategic matter in ten years.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 20:27:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310311#post310311</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310311#post310311</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Josie Pagani reckons Labour have done exactly the <a href="http://www.pundit.co.nz/content/labour-does-not-need-to-promise-a-coalition-with-the-greens" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">right thing</a>. Now who finds that reassuring. and why?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 19:18:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310310#post310310</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310310#post310310</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Greens members wouldn't be happy propping up a National government. But the Maori party managed it. </q></p><p>Greens members actually get to decide. Can't see it.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 19:17:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bmk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310302#post310302</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310302#post310302</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Looking far too likely. Wouldn't last 3 years, but who needs any more pain?</q></p><p>This is why I think if Labour won't play nice with the Greens they need to consider going with National. A National-Greens government would be far better for the country than a National-NZF govt. I think…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 18:00:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310301#post310301</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310301#post310301</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the best realistic outcome from this election might be for National to have to cobble up a flaky coalition with Winston</q></p><p>Looking far too likely. Wouldn't last 3 years, but who needs any more pain?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 17:38:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310300#post310300</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310300#post310300</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Labour may regret this if the Greens decide to not support confidence and supply at all. Good luck running a minority govt with Winnie vs the Nats, and having to seek Greens support bill by bill.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 17:33:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310299#post310299</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310299#post310299</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>In any case, the Greens will be harder for Labour to ignore than in 2002-2005, for the simple fact that they now have double-digit support – the only third party currently in that realm, and even NZ First at its peak never reached that magic number.</p><p>And the Greens' current…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 17:05:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Johnny Canuck</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310283#post310283</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310283#post310283</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Labour were running continual attacks on the instability and shameless opportunism of a government that was falling to bits and veering between extreme right ideology and weird corruption</q></p><p>Ah, those were the days. Labour landed hit after hit on that hapless excuse for a government. The contrast with 2014 is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 11:07:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310281#post310281</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310281#post310281</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The Green haters who make up ~1/4* of Labour's vote! Of course Labour wants to keep them in the tent, we don't have the luxury of telling voters they are insufficiently pure --- and if the Greens have any sense, they'd much rather Shane Jones was picking up that vote…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 10:55:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>TracyMac</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310277#post310277</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310277#post310277</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I think if Winston gets in there as a nice bandaid to certain voting sectors, such a combination would prove more intractable to get rid of. And when he is being pandered to with a sufficiently-senior ministry, he does know how to keep his mouth shut. At least about the…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 10:36:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310272#post310272</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310272#post310272</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>This is heresy, and betrayal from me as a Green, but I'm starting to wonder if the best realistic outcome from this election might be for National to have to cobble up a flaky coalition with Winston.</q></p><p>'Heresy" would be too strong a word, but I'd like everyone (including the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 07:37:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310271#post310271</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310271#post310271</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Jeez, Espiner is being a complete oik this morning</p><p>He seems to think we might care more about what <em>he thinks</em> his interviewees think, than letting them tell us themselves …</p><p>He needs to get out of his own way, <br />rather than constantly hunting the ‘soundbite’ <em>he</em> wants…</p><p>…or maybe…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 07:32:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JLM</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310266#post310266</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310266#post310266</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						This is heresy, and betrayal from me as a Green, but I'm starting to wonder if the best realistic outcome from this election might be for National to have to cobble up a flaky coalition with Winston. As Winston is an interventionist and does have the glimmerings of a social…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 07:00:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Chris Waugh</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310264#post310264</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310264#post310264</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Way off topic, but it's about the upcoming election, so as one soon-to-be-repatriate I'd like to recommend <a href="http://thedailyblog.co.nz/2014/04/10/guest-blog-david-tank-how-inequality-forced-me-from-my-home/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this article</a>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:02:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310262#post310262</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310262#post310262</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						When Labour made nice with Anderton (note there was no formal agreement), Labour were on track to be the single largest party. Anderton was ex-Labour, and Labour were running continual attacks on the instability and shameless opportunism of a government that was falling to bits and veering between extreme right…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 23:32:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310248#post310248</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310248#post310248</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Steady on. No one was asking John Key whether he wanted to campaign jointly with Colin Craig, were they?</q></p><p>No &ndash; instead there were bizarre fantasies that Colin Craig was just going to be handed one of the safest National seats in the country, with the cheerful acquiescence of Murray…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:36:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Geddis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310246#post310246</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310246#post310246</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I went for “wedding guest” in the original post, but yeah.</q></p><p>Given the branding of the political party involved, it would be a red wedding. And I'm not over that yet.</p><p>But call Peters what you want (and there's many things I'd like to) his centrality to any hopes to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:01:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310245#post310245</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310245#post310245</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And then what odds that he’ll be happy to be a spare wheel on a formal Labour-Greens Government?</q></p><p>I went for "wedding guest" in the original post, but yeah.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 19:49:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Geddis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310244#post310244</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310244#post310244</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> But National doesn’t have a large potential coalition partner who just asked them to campaign with them so I used the Conservatives as an analogy.</q></p><p>Which makes the analogy a not very good one. Asking John Key "what do you plan to do about Colin Craig" is not the same…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 19:46:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danyl Mclauchlan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310241#post310241</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310241#post310241</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Steady on. No one was asking John Key whether he wanted to campaign jointly with Colin Craig, were they?</q></p><p>No, I am aware of that thanks. But National doesn't have a large potential coalition partner who just asked them to campaign with them so I used the Conservatives as an…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 19:07:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310239#post310239</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310239#post310239</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Labour doesn’t know what the election campaign will look like either! Six weeks out from the election it might be a good idea to campaign in tandem with the Greens – just as it was for them to team up with the Alliance during the 1999 campaign – at which…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 19:05:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310238#post310238</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310238#post310238</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>My first thoughts on hearing about it this morning. Is Labour are clearly thinking they can redo 2005; go into coalition with NZF and negotiate abstention from the Greens for a few tokens.</p><p>What their mistake is is that the Greens will make up a much bigger portion of the…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 18:54:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310237#post310237</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310237#post310237</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Hard to see that's not the play though, right? It's a clever way to bash Labour as being untrustworthy etc --- the 2005 trope reappears with depressing predictability --- and emphasise the importance of voting Green if you're wavering Green/Labour. Shades of Corngate.</q></p><p>Oh, who's being a wee bit precious…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 18:17:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bmk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310236#post310236</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310236#post310236</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>My first thoughts on hearing about it this morning. Is Labour are clearly thinking they can redo 2005; go into coalition with NZF and negotiate abstention from the Greens for a few tokens. </p><p>What their mistake is is that the Greens will make up a much bigger portion of the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 18:14:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danyl Mclauchlan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310235#post310235</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310235#post310235</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Mr Cunliffe told the Herald tonight he envisaged that Labour would try to negotiate a formal coalition agreement with the Greens after the election,</p><p>“The Labour Party will be the core of the incoming Government working co-operatively with the Green Party who are our longstanding friends.</q></p><p>That’s not the same…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:48:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310232#post310232</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310232#post310232</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Sounds like they already did say that.</q></p><p>Also:</p><p><q>"I'm the leader of the Labour Party and my job is to maximize the Labour Party vote," he said ...</p><p>But Labour would quite possibly be working with other parties as well "and whatever the coalition arrangements are, they need to be…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:31:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310231#post310231</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310231#post310231</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>From which I gather you’re counting any criticism of Labour as an attack, or you’re reading with a bias where attacks shine through in a way that other comments don’t.</q></p><p>Nah, I'm not, but "corrupt", "spineless",  "lost at sea", "flailing", "owned by the unions" et al did seem unhelpful to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:27:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310230#post310230</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310230#post310230</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> But (I think) the sensible thing for Labour to do in this situation would be to say to the Greens ‘We’ll think about it. Maybe closer to the election. Let’s keep talking.’</q><br />Sounds like they already did say that.</p><p><a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&amp;objectid=11235338" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> From Audrey Young in the Herald</a></p><p><br /><q>Mr Cunliffe told the Herald…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:27:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310229#post310229</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310229#post310229</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Oh, come on. There are about a dozen attacks on Labour in a not-very-long thread, a</q></p><p>In your honour I counted 42 comments, 12 critical of Labour of which I think 7 count as attacks. "Bad mistake on Labour's part", for example, is critical but not an attack, while "they…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:17:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danyl Mclauchlan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310228#post310228</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310228#post310228</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Good conspiracy theory, but isn’t it vastly more likely that Jones is simply pleasing himself in the knowledge that any public censure would be politically out of bounds for Cunliffe?</q></p><p>That’s possible. But (I think) the sensible thing for Labour to do in this situation would be to say to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:04:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310227#post310227</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310227#post310227</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						so I take it this 'leadership group' is a subset of caucus? genuine question, as above.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:57:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310225#post310225</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310225#post310225</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Meanwhile, <a href="http://chirb.it/DI6hqe" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">one-man clusterfuck</a> by David Parker on exactly who made the decision. Jesus. Just say it.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:49:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310224#post310224</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310224#post310224</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Russel, it seems you have picked the worst of the few comments that attack Labour and highlighted it. Which is interesting given your normal position on media angles. Especially since we’re talking about Facebook here, where the standard of comment is often dismal.</q></p><p>Oh, come on. There are about a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:46:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310223#post310223</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310223#post310223</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Link here. Trigger warning for massive fits of pique from Russel’s Facebook followers</q></p><p>Russel, it seems you have picked the worst of the few comments that attack Labour and highlighted it. Which is interesting given your normal position on media angles. Especially since we're talking about Facebook here, where the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:38:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310222#post310222</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310222#post310222</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>That falls apart when Shane Jones starts attacking the Greens on such a routine basis that it becomes obvious that its a strategy, with the Greens constrained from critiquing Labour back because that would trigger ‘bitterly divided’ stories. </q></p><p>Good conspiracy theory, but isn’t it vastly more likely that Jones is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:38:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310220#post310220</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310220#post310220</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Link here. Trigger warning for massive fits of pique from Russel’s Facebook followers (Labour is “corrupt and self-serving” etc). The volume of bile being spat at Labour for differing on the issue seems unhelpful.</q></p><p>Important to clarify that this set of people represents the general public, ie. is quite different…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:22:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310219#post310219</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310219#post310219</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>And listening to Russel Norman this morning on National Radio, he didn’t appear to me to be being precious. I thought that Guyon was trying to get him to play that card, but it just didn’t happen (which seemed to throw Guyon off, perhaps because he didn’t have any cue…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:17:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310218#post310218</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310218#post310218</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> given the upside simply isn't that large, the natural tendency of cautious social democrats will be to avoid the risk.</q></p><p>Yes, and we've seen a lot of that. It seems to go hand in hand with falling polls. Oddly, rather than saying "polls go up when we announce definite policy,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:17:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310217#post310217</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310217#post310217</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hard to see that's not the play though, right? It's a clever way to bash Labour as being untrustworthy etc --- the 2005 trope reappears with depressing predictability --- and emphasise the importance of voting Green if you're wavering Green/Labour. Shades of Corngate.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:16:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen R</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310216#post310216</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310216#post310216</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I mean, there was no way Labour was ever going to buy the "let's have a formal pre-election alliance" deal on offer, and so to act as if the rejection is a grand insult is, frankly, precious.</q></p><p>And listening to Russel Norman this morning on National Radio, he didn't appear…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:15:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310215#post310215</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310215#post310215</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>I just don’t think this deal would have helped Labour. I think the notion that Labour needs to desperately ensure every poll is reported as close, and to do must be willing to throw away independence of action post election, and political distinctiveness, is very questionable, especially given most polls…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:14:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310214#post310214</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310214#post310214</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Russel Norman’s summing-up on Facebook:</p><p><q>Green Party political positioning is set by the branch delegates at the AGM in June. But it’s highly likely that we will do something similar to last election with a strong preference to work towards a Green Labour government. So we thought it would be…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:12:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310212#post310212</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310212#post310212</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>NZPower was carefully firewalled so that Labour wasn’t seen as giving the Greens a blanket endorsement</q></p><p>I recall reading that the Greens come up with their policy first on that, and agreed to co-launch with Labour. If there was a blanket endorsement I doubt it was one-way.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:07:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310211#post310211</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310211#post310211</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Labour and the Greens picking specific policy issues and making specific policy announcements together does have some merit. </q></p><p>Hope that can still happen in some way.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:05:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310210#post310210</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310210#post310210</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Except that's not really what Labour's saying, is it? I mean, there was no way Labour was ever going to buy the "let's have a formal pre-election alliance" deal on offer, and so to act as if the rejection is a grand insult is, frankly, precious.</p><p>I just don't think…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:00:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310209#post310209</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310209#post310209</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>To further complicate things, Green folks are saying that pre-election positioning will be decided at the party AGM in June.</p><p>So any agreement on the proposal to Labour would have had to be ratified by branch delegates at the AGM. </p><p>But any post-election deal would be negotiated by a team…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:59:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310208#post310208</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310208#post310208</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>how does the Green Party play in South Auckland? Well, not very well, to be frank. How about marginals, like the Coast or Waimak? Erm. Ah.</q></p><p>The Greens have done poorly in the South Auckland electorates for the same reason National does poorly; ongoing loyalty to Labour, weak electorate organisations,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:52:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310207#post310207</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310207#post310207</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the decision was that of the leadership team</q></p><p>who's that?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:49:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310206#post310206</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310206#post310206</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Maybe there are downsides to being tightly tied to the Greens, as well as upsides? And in this case, given the upside simply isn’t that large, the natural tendency of cautious social democrats will be to avoid the risk.</q></p><p>or they could refer to the sort of polling Danyl linked…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:48:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310204#post310204</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310204#post310204</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>Again though George, you’re a Green party member! Of course you like the idea that Labour commits to the Greens.</em></p><p>Yes. Their Wellington Central campaign manager (a volunteer position). But I also accept that politics is a business in which numbers count, and Labour would be ill-advised to take a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:44:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310203#post310203</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310203#post310203</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						oops, wrong Rob
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:43:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310202#post310202</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310202#post310202</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Also a concrete alignment might appear to split Labour internally as well and it's been shown to fuel media and the Govt.<br />As a Labour voter , I can see the diverse group that makes up the Party being good enough to accept that a coalition can happen with the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:42:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310201#post310201</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310201#post310201</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And the narrative...</q><br />...is what you get <br />when you put the <strong>'rrat</strong>'*<br />amongst the <strong>'naive'</strong><br />needs, must...<br />telling times a'comin'</p><p><br /><strong></strong>*from Southland <br /><em>obviously!</em><br />;- )</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:39:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310200#post310200</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310200#post310200</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>So ...</p><p>The Greens have now said that remaining on the cross-benches is an option for them, which I think they're obliged to do in the circumstances.</p><p>And Labour has made a complete pig's arse out of making it clear that the decision was that of the leadership team rather…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:34:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310199#post310199</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310199#post310199</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Again though George, you're a Green party member! Of course you like the idea that Labour commits to the Greens. Similarly but differently Gordon Campbell etc. I really think a lot of this is pretty motivated reasoning: Labour should be more like the Greens (because I like the Greens).</p><p>But…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:29:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Luke Williamson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310198#post310198</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310198#post310198</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Winning the election is about beating John Key and he only stumbles when he gets cornered &ndash; the nasty JK appears and gives everyone a fright. What will make him feel cornered and act a little desperately is the prospect of an opposition coalition polling at 48%. A coalition that…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:28:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310197#post310197</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310197#post310197</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>This is the thing I would like to know. Who leaked it? Because that does seem like an act of bad faith.</q></p><p>So would I &mdash; and it's funny how many folks on my Twitter have assumed it's someone in the Greens, and that the whole thing was just a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:20:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310196#post310196</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310196#post310196</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q> It became routine to talk about the Labour/Green position in the polls (‘Neck and neck!’) instead of just Labour vs National (’miles behind). And that was helpful to Labour. It makes them relevant and gets them to say they’re in with a chance, that there’s a stable government in waiting,…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:16:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310195#post310195</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310195#post310195</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Rob Salmond (who advises Labour's leader) <a href="http://polity.co.nz/content/greens-proposed-pre-election-deal" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">offers his opinion</a>, which comes down to <em>New Zealand's comparatively fair electoral system doesn't provide Labour much incentive to accept it.</em></p><p>I find this unconvincing, but for the reason that I think it does not bolster Labour's own support within its potential voter pool.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:09:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310191#post310191</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310191#post310191</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> The fact this is public and a story is another stumble.</q></p><p>This is the thing I <em>would</em> like to know. Who leaked it? Because that does seem like an act of bad faith.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 14:20:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310190#post310190</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310190#post310190</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I’m with Luke and Gordon Campbell et al here. Labour needed this more than the Greens. Because the perception is they are timid and divided and unclear what they stand for. Whereas the Greens (even if their actual policy <em>is</em>  ‘incompetently written and uncosted’ – can’t comment on that) come…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 14:02:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Luke Williamson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310188#post310188</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310188#post310188</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And while I am being a comment hog, I don't understand why the commentators are so convinced that Winston would go with a Labour coalition when he already has form for campaigning on a "get rid of National" platform in 1996 and then promptly joining them in coalition. Winston will…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:46:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310187#post310187</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310187#post310187</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						"I'm a Green voter and I'm mad that Labour continues to insist on maintaining an independent political identity" is not really a great argument here.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:46:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310186#post310186</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310186#post310186</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The AU coalition is a long term de facto merger between the National, Country and Liberal parties (rural and urban Tories). Because they have preferential voting, multiple aligned parties can run in electorates without letting Labour in by vote splitting. This allows National/Country to persist where its NZ equivalents (Reform,…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:45:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Luke Williamson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310185#post310185</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310185#post310185</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>This bit out of Gordon Campbell was bang on for me.<br />"Would a united Greens/Labour front have polarised the electorate? You bet. On that score, the electorate is way ahead of Labour. Much of it is already polarised, and in opposition to the policies and personalities of the Key government.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:41:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Luke Williamson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310184#post310184</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310184#post310184</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Absolutely, and they should be talking to each other to work out a consistent message that points out the evils of National. They also need to motivate the non-voters and disillusioned Labour voters.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:39:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310183#post310183</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310183#post310183</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But if you want to define the Labour/Green realationship, you need to dedicate substantial resources to it and come up with an actual coalition agreement, and a pretty clear joint programme.</q></p><p>Or be able to clearly articulate your points of agreement, which should only be as difficult as you choose…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:34:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Luke Williamson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310182#post310182</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310182#post310182</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The danger for Labour, I feel, is that this is just another move in the direction of not defining themselves. They don't have to enter into any formal agreements pre-election but they have to start to stand for somethign. As we get closer to the election, they just look more…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:33:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danyl Mclauchlan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310181#post310181</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310181#post310181</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> And you don’t see Labour and the Greens attacking each other this year either.</q></p><p>Except you do see a senior Labour MP attacking the Greens on a routine basis. </p><p><q>Did you call for a formal campaign coalition before today?. Given the view that it’s apparently an absolute no-brainer, I’m trying…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:32:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310180#post310180</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310180#post310180</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Your URL’s missing</q></p><p>Fixed &ndash; for once, I noticed it before the edit window closed. :) </p><p><q>which was formed after the 1922 general election. After. It's not the same thing.</q></p><p>Simple statement of fact there, but it's existed (in various forms) through every Australian federal election since.  Not always peacefully,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:31:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310179#post310179</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310179#post310179</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						But if you want to define the Labour/Green realationship, you need to dedicate substantial resources to it and come up with an actual coalition agreement, and a pretty clear joint programme. If you go to the electorate as an alliance but without a joint programme, it would be bizarre.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:25:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310178#post310178</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310178#post310178</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> The difference is that without a formal alliance, it is National which gets to frame what a Labour-Green government will do, rather than them getting a chance to frame it themselves.</q></p><p>Yeah, and I think this is worth pointing out, but would require some homework from the press: This kind…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:24:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310176#post310176</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310176#post310176</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>National will cricise them regardless. The difference is that without a formal alliance, it is National which gets to frame what a Labour-Green government will do, rather than them getting a chance to frame it themselves.</q></p><p>Did you call for a formal campaign coalition before today?. Given the view that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:21:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310174#post310174</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310174#post310174</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Weird how this has existed in Australian politics for over 90 years, with Tony Abbot spending precisely zero time on this kind of doomsday scenario.</q></p><p>Your URL’s missing, but I assume you mean the Liberal-National coalition, which was formed after the 1922 general election. After. It's not the same thing.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:17:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310173#post310173</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310173#post310173</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I fear you will be disappointed on both counts.</q></p><p>You're probably right, but since Winston's already started laying down quarter-arsed bottom lines like <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/9831041/Peters-backing-fix-for-icon" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this</a> it's a perfectly legitimate question to ask.  Not that Winston's bromantic partners in the Press Gallery will bother.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:14:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310172#post310172</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310172#post310172</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>No Right Turn takes the opposite view &mdash; that the absence of a Labour-Green campaign coalition will give National more scope for mischief, because National will be able to define the relationship itself. This seems counter-intuitive to me &mdash; surely National would be more likely to make hay out of…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:10:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310171#post310171</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310171#post310171</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>And, of course, if Labour did do a deal with the Greens, Cunliffe would have to spend the next six months either defending Green party policy (much of which is (a) incompetently written and un-costed, and (b) off-putting to centrist voters) or repudiating Green party policy, in an ad hoc…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:10:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310170#post310170</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310170#post310170</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But Labour and the Alliance didn’t campaign together in 1999 and didn’t enter a formal agreement until after the votes had been cast.</q></p><p>Helen and Jim buried the hatchet in the lead up to 1999, which is not the same thing as a formal agreement.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:08:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310169#post310169</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310169#post310169</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I’d like both Key and Cunliffe to decide what they think about Winston Peters this week, if you don’t mind.</q></p><p>I fear you will be disappointed on both counts.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:01:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310168#post310168</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310168#post310168</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> if you don’t mind.</q></p><p>People can speculate all they like, but I think it would be better if MSM didn't and actually report how it is.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:00:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310167#post310167</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310167#post310167</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						How could Labour have agreed to this? Either it would have required a full coalition agreement to be hammered out now --- which would have meant taking half the frontbench of both parties away from frontline duties for a week, without any civil service support ---, or else it would…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:00:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310166#post310166</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310166#post310166</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>No – and I’d suggest you learn something from history where Labour and the Alliance very publicly buried the hatchet elsewhere than in each other’s backs.</q></p><p>Sure. And you don't see Labour and the Greens attacking each other this year either. But Labour and the Alliance didn't campaign together in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:59:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310165#post310165</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310165#post310165</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And isn't the whole "tea Party" thang that Key introduced with Act ,just the sort of thing that pissed us off last time. Dodgy deals look like dodgy deals, which don't please everyone. </q></p><p>Yeah, thanks for that Sofie.  I'd like both Key and Cunliffe to decide what they think about…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:51:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310164#post310164</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310164#post310164</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Yes, usually. And like I said, that's what everyone was doing just last week. I know it's equally traditional to heap scorn on Labour for whatever, but I'm frankly not seeing it here.</q></p><p>And isn't the whole "tea Party" thang that Key introduced with Act ,just the sort of thing…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:48:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310163#post310163</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310163#post310163</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Danyl says Labour’s position seems like a big risk given what polls tell us.</q></p><p>That's an interesting point about the polling at the time of the NZ Power announcement, but it's worth bearing in mind that it was followed not long after by polls so bad that Labour changed its…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:45:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310162#post310162</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310162#post310162</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>This seems counter-intuitive to me &mdash; surely National would be more likely to make hay out of the fact of a formal coalition?</q></p><p>No &ndash; and I'd suggest you learn something from history where Labour and the Alliance very publicly buried the hatchet elsewhere than in each other's backs.  Of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:40:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310161#post310161</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310161#post310161</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>It looks a thankless decision either way. Cosy up to the Greens, and risk getting painted as the loony left wagging the dog. Fob off the Greens, and risk looking like sell-outs.</p><p>There are 2 ways for Labour to increase its share of the vote, without cannibalising the Greens vote:…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:39:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310159#post310159</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310159#post310159</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Danyl says Labour's position seems like a <a href="http://dimpost.wordpress.com/2014/04/10/jaw-dropping-risk-of-the-day/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">big risk</a> given what polls tell us.</p><p><q>my guess is that most Labour voters who are sympathetic to the Greens – and according to the Colmar Brunton poll that’s about 70% of Labour voters – don’t feel the need to switch because ever…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:17:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310158#post310158</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310158#post310158</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Is it possible that Labour has this right? Isn’t the point of MMP that you have multiple parties each closely representing a percentage of the population.<br />THEN<br />After the election you build a coalition.</q></p><p>Yes, usually. And like I said, that's what everyone was doing just last week. I know…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:12:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310157#post310157</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310157#post310157</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						However, voters assess which parties are likely to be in government together when casting their vote. Pre-election agreements or coalitions are one way to signal that. Cups of tea and smoke signals work in some places.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:07:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310155#post310155</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310155#post310155</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Is it possible that Labour has this right? Isn't the point of MMP that you have multiple parties each closely representing a percentage of the population.<br />THEN<br />After the election you build a coalition.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:03:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310154#post310154</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310154#post310154</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Rob Campbell (now we just need John to chime in) notes that NZ's electoral setup makes pre-election deals <a href="http://polity.co.nz/content/greens-proposed-pre-election-deal" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">less likely</a> than in some other nations.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 11:59:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310152#post310152</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310152#post310152</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>because National will be able to define the relationship itself</q></p><p>I think that’s part of Gordon Campbell’s thesis too. <br />Ah, I see I/S has made that link.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 11:54:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310151#post310151</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310151#post310151</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I agree with <a href="http://gordoncampbell.scoop.co.nz/2014/04/10/gordon-campbell-on-the-failure-to-create-a-labourgreens-alliance/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Gordon Campbell's</a> assessment &ndash; this is just more of the feckless timidity that has strangled Labour for the past 6 years and is unlikely to result in anything other than a third term for National. Thanks a bunch.</p><p><q>Such an alliance might have galvanised Cunliffe’s campaign, currently…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 11:53:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bob daktari</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310150#post310150</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310150#post310150</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I saw a tweet that suggested if the greens and labour present a united front for the election it would give our Media the option of shooting two birds down with one stone (story)... instead they now have to do two unflattering stories covering the respective parties
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 11:53:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310149#post310149</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310149#post310149</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						No Right Turn <a href="http://norightturn.blogspot.co.nz/2014/04/unsurprising.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">takes the opposite view</a> &mdash; that the absence of a Labour-Green campaign coalition will give National more scope for mischief, because National will be able to define the relationship itself. This seems counter-intuitive to me &mdash; surely National would be more likely to make hay out of…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 11:45:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310147#post310147</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310147#post310147</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> If there is any doubt about Hone speaking his mind, forget it.</q><br />Never had doubt. Found it cute that The Maori Party are all up "in arms" over Mana,Internet, trying to suggest its all about the money when the irony is that ,that is why Hone left them. As if…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 11:41:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hebe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310146#post310146</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310146#post310146</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Shite journalism all round. I expect to be treated like an adult: given the facts in an objective manner and left to make up my own mind. Espiner has mistaken presenting and reporting for commentating, as have most of the rest of the "name" broadcast journos in this country.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 11:34:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310144#post310144</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310144#post310144</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Sadly conjecture gussied up as 'fact' seems to be the new norm in mass media.</q></p><p>I watched 3 Degrees  last night and is it just me or is Rachel Smalley emulating Guyon with a bit of Paddy thrown in? Sad...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 11:16:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310143#post310143</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310143#post310143</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I wonder if Guyon will declare a war between National and ACT since (wait for it!) John Key has not declared that he will have a cup of tea with their new leader! Dark days ahead for ACT then.</q></p><p>Good point.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 11:14:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ianmac</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310142#post310142</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310142#post310142</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>spiner is a complete fail as an interviewer to be trusted, I heard him ambush someone else the other day...</q><br />That was an interview with Hone where Guyon suddenly switched from the agreed topic to questions about the possible alliance with Dotcom. Hone's retort was explicit  about the the lack…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 11:14:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ianmac</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310141#post310141</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310141#post310141</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						A bit ominous actually. This weeks Morning Report has been insipid and repetitive.  Guyon seems to be like Paddy in that if there is a simple straightforward explanation he (they) twist it into some dark plot. I wonder if Guyon will declare a war between National and ACT since (wait…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 11:07:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310140#post310140</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310140#post310140</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Mourning Report?</strong><br />Espiner is a complete fail as an interviewer to be trusted, I heard him ambush someone else the other day &ndash; ya have to wonder if he is trying to kill <em>Morning Report's</em> credibility with both interviewees and listeners...</p><p>Sadly conjecture gussied up as 'fact' seems to be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 11:00:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen R</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310138#post310138</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310138#post310138</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Listening to the interview by Guyon of Russel in the car on the way to work this morning, I had to turn it off. Guyon seemed desperate to get the narrative out that the Greens and Labour were about to go to war with each other, despite Russel being completely…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:46:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310137#post310137</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-to-be-expected/?p=310137#post310137</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:46:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
