<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Hard News: The Wellington Declaration</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>chris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161977#post161977</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161977#post161977</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>What the fuck happened to Democracy?.</p></blockquote><p>Too much energy spent nurturing and celebrating freedom of speech, too little energy extended to engaging in protest and activism or anything else of measurable significance.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:49:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161963#post161963</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161963#post161963</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						That link rather definitely has an agenda that it pushes hard. As a general rule, any discussion of the economics of copyright that doesn't have the words `public good problem' in it is missing something out (also beware of any discussion without `marginal cost'). In this case they are obscuring…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 01:04:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161934#post161934</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161934#post161934</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I need to re-listen but he did seem to miss many points for an expert. Thanks, that reference is a coherent challenge to some fundamental myths &ndash; a recommended read.</p><blockquote><p>It is vital to understand that these side effects are not accidents, not unexpected consequences of an otherwise well-intentioned effort…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 00:04:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161930#post161930</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161930#post161930</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						O! Very interesting Simon Grigg &ndash; and curiously not overwhelmingly surprising. Will go back and read it again, and then digest. And then comment.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 19:27:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Grigg</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161929#post161929</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161929#post161929</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The first paragraph of <a href="http://questioncopyright.org/promise" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this</a> (courtesy of Mark Harris) seems to contradict parts of John's history, or at the very least add another fascinating element to the development of copyright in the 200 years before the 1709 statute.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 19:13:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jake Pollock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161928#post161928</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161928#post161928</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks Sacha.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 18:51:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161927#post161927</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161927#post161927</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Radio NZ interviewed specialist author <a href="http://www.adrianjohns.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Adrian Johns</a> today about the history of copyright (<a href="http://www.radionz.co.nz/audio/national/twu/2010/04/17/acta_and_the_history_of_ip_piracy" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">streaming</a> 30 mins).
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:00:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161926#post161926</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161926#post161926</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>TRONT was consulted? -rather elements within TRONT were consulted. When the Maori Party were informed of more widespread views, they withdrew their support for the canning of ECan.<br />The matter hasnt yet come before the hui-a-tau (wont, until November) when much more widespread views will be made know.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:53:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161925#post161925</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161925#post161925</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I thought of you when I first read that one
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:43:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Grigg</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161924#post161924</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161924#post161924</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/04/us-government-finally-admits-most-piracy-estimates-are-bogus.ars" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">US government calls bullshit on most piracy estimates</a>.</p><p>Really? Now that's a bloody surprise.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:40:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161923#post161923</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161923#post161923</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Education standards give a taste of what can happen when decisions affect many people directly. More and more families will be dealing with the fallout of government policy like deliberate moves to <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/3592575/Rest-home-restrictions-putting-people-at-risk" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">cut support services</a> for vulnerable older people. </p><p>I hope their anger is directed at the Minister of Health…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:31:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161922#post161922</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161922#post161922</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						But they were "consulted" &ndash; just like <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/christchurch/3592576/Councillor-calls-for-reprimand-of-Parker" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sideshow Bob was</a>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:21:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161921#post161921</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161921#post161921</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Keep an eye open for certain iwi reactions...TRONT are not happy about the dumping of ECan.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:15:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161920#post161920</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161920#post161920</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The good folk of Christchurch might finally be waking up to their shafting. Hope they're smart enough to encircle the Beehive rather than the ECan building.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:12:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161919#post161919</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161919#post161919</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Need way better organised opposition that we have seen from the tired warriors of the trad left. Watching how much more successful these local copyright-related campaigns have been reassures me that all hope is not lost just yet.</p></blockquote><p>How about the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gherao" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">gherao</a>?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 15:29:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161918#post161918</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161918#post161918</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>My point is that the frequency of this kind of obfuscation over back-room dealing is becoming the norm, just like urgency.</p><p>What the fuck happened to Democracy?.</p></blockquote><p>Those who support it are doing a poor job of explaining what it means, whereas those who benefit from its absence are doing…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 15:04:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161917#post161917</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161917#post161917</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						There is a particular trait that has been becoming more prevalent in political disclosure of late. It smacks of disingenuous denials. The number of times  we have been told that "nothing has been agreed" or <a href="http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/key-no-plans-sell-kiwirail-120429 " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> "there  is no plan"</a> as a way of settling public disquiet about agendas…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:30:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161916#post161916</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161916#post161916</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Great news. Unlike the pessimistic commenters on that Ars post, I am glad that public action is producing some backdowns.  I know that does not mean the content of the agreement will necessarily change. Publication nonetheless makes it easier to pile more pressure on our governments to behave like they…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 13:25:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Dylan Mordaunt</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161915#post161915</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161915#post161915</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>ACTA draft to be released (officially):</p><p><a href="http://www.ustr.gov/about-us/press-office/press-releases/2010/april/office-us-trade-representative-releases-statement-ac" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.ustr.gov/about-us/press-office/press-releases/2010/april/office-us-trade-representative-releases-statement-ac</a></p><p>from</p><p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/04/free-at-last-official-acta-text-coming-next-week.ars" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/04/free-at-last-official-acta-text-coming-next-week.ars</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 12:28:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161763#post161763</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161763#post161763</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Too right. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonny_Bono_Copyright_Term_Extension_Act" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Sonny Bono Act</a> all started <br />with a mouse.</p></blockquote><p>then it was all downhill for Senator Sonny and ended<br />with a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonny_Bono#Death" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">tree</a> ...</p><blockquote><p>...raised some sort of whimpery snickers...</p></blockquote><p>sounds like a brand of ecclesiastical underwear...<br />take it away Mr Fellini...<br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYzRL9YIswQ" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYzRL9YIswQ</a><br />Wear-a-bull art anyone?<br />(I love the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:56:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161753#post161753</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161753#post161753</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						In creative industries it is the middlemen who are losing their privileged spot, not the creators. International finance and parasitic speculation, on the other hand..
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:25:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161749#post161749</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161749#post161749</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>   Propping up antiquated business models in perpetuity is the antithesis of a flourishing and prosperous business ecosystem. We can do better,</blockquote>Trouble is, Sacha, that the antiquated business models that get the focus from the likes of us are not the same antiquated business models looked at by the likes of…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:03:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161748#post161748</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161748#post161748</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Anti-competitive Mickey Mouse greed has a lot to do with that. Propping up antiquated business models in perpetuity is the antithesis of a flourishing and prosperous business ecosystem. We can do better, unless we sell ourselves out for some baubles and a pat on the head from daddy.</p></blockquote><p>Too right.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:01:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161746#post161746</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161746#post161746</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Certainly if we want more VC-funded innovative businesses then we will need good IP regulatory systems &ndash; and we have those. Understanding and managing investment risk is also a two-way street and our property-skewed market and woeful private sector R&D spend has not helped spread the right skills and knowledge around…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:26:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ScottY</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161743#post161743</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161743#post161743</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>In NZ they don't put money into R&amp;D at all, as we've seen.</p></blockquote><p>They don't invest enough into R&amp;D, sure. But it's wrong to say they don't put money into R&amp;D at all.</p><p>There are all sorts of reasons why businesses don't invest in R&amp;D. That's an entirely different discussion. But I'm pretty certain…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:09:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161738#post161738</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161738#post161738</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Businesspeople don't generally put money into R&amp;D out of altruism.</p></blockquote><p>In NZ they don't put money into R&amp;D at all, as we've seen. Clearly the patent system is far from the only motivator to innovate.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:02:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Robbie Siataga</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161724#post161724</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161724#post161724</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						BTW has anyone else been gutted by the fact that, a lot of mp3 album blogs and links from forums have been wiped from existence in the last few months ?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:14:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ScottY</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161710#post161710</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161710#post161710</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Does the system still encourage innovation</p></blockquote><p>If a patent system didn't exist to reward investment in innovation, there'd be much less investment in R&amp;D. That seems obvious. Businesspeople don't generally put money into R&amp;D out of altruism.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:09:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161688#post161688</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161688#post161688</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Aha!!!<br />But.<br />Patents can become just more bits of paper that get traded, the same way that junk bonds and CDO's were in the good old days.<br />I'm sure private equity investment vehicles do due diligence and have teams of experts on board to accurately asses the value of such…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:19:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ScottY</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161682#post161682</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161682#post161682</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>You must acknowledge that the only people that make real money out of patents... are Lawyers, Shriley?</p></blockquote><p>Happily no. I'll give you just a couple of examples I've been involved in recently.  I have an NZ client who about a month ago got paid a seven figure sum on the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:52:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161678#post161678</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161678#post161678</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>first laugh of the day- thanks Steve Barnes!<br />(Tho' Ian-the-dazzle has raised some sort of whimpery snickers-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:41:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161676#post161676</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161676#post161676</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>apparently IP address means Intellectual Property address! with the UK's new Digital Economy, Bill.</p></blockquote><p>Who is this Bill? Is it the same Bill who sent me this?</p><blockquote><p>1. A bicycle can't stand alone; it is two tired.<br />2. A will is a dead giveaway.<br />3. Time flies like an arrow;…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:34:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161674#post161674</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161674#post161674</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>the ACTApus &ndash; armless suckers?</strong><br />apparently IP address means <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/04/uk-govt-ip-address-is-intellectual-property-address.ars" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Intellectual Property address!</a> with the UK's new Digital Economy Bill.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:17:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161670#post161670</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161670#post161670</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Actually, that's not quite true. There was that guy that invented cat's eyes. Who passed away leaving a fortune worth, almost, £193,500, he could have almost bought a <a href="http://www.propertyinpeckham.co.uk/Detail.php?id=5145 " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> reasonably sized flat in Peckham</a> for that.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:38:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161668#post161668</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161668#post161668</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>As I said, don't underestimate the deterrent effect of a patent or patent application.</p></blockquote><p>As I said</p><blockquote><p>If you have enough money "All of your patent are belong to us".</p></blockquote><p>You must acknowledge that the only people that make real money out of patents...  are Lawyers,  Shriley?<br /> ;-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:27:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ScottY</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161604#post161604</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161604#post161604</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Patents can protect processes as well as products. But it is quite common to treat a manufacturing process as a trade secret, rather than seek patent protection for it. </p><p>A granted patent over the process would prevent competitors from exploiting it (assuming you enforce your rights &ndash; though don't underestimate…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:32:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161603#post161603</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161603#post161603</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>For the purpose of examining patents, it is assumed that the innovative step must not be obvious to an expert in the field. </blockquote>Which is why software patent fall outside simple mechanical patent. If the innovative step is not obvious to an expert in the field it must be illogical…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:28:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161596#post161596</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161596#post161596</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote> Unfortunately, there are some inventions that you just can't usefully keep secret &ndash; the moment you release them to the public your competitors can easily work out how to copy them.</blockquote>This particular conversation was about a process rather that a product, unless your competition wanders around your factory and poking…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:08:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161568#post161568</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161568#post161568</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Shooting at Gerald Mc...</strong><br />nice to see Cory Doctorow, at Boing Boing, <br />and Russell Brown, at PAS, on the same page...<br />all hail the ACTA-vists<br />and vistas beyond...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:12:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ScottY</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161525#post161525</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161525#post161525</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>To be granted a patent you have to divulge your process which allows others, with more power than you will ever have, access to your work. If they infringe your patent you are fucked. If, on the other hand you just keep it a secret then you are a lot…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 21:28:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161518#post161518</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161518#post161518</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Without wishing to inflame another copyright war in a thread where we have good stories to celebrate, IP lawyer Guy Burgess's recent column <a href="http://www.burgess.co.nz/law/software-patents-whos-really-upset" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">about software patents</a> seems relevant (h/t Colin Jackson).</p><blockquote><p>So, in the main, it appears that those unhappy about the decision are limited to the local subsidiaries of…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:34:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161500#post161500</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161500#post161500</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But if you're going to be a dick about it, then I think that this is the point at which I bow out.</p></blockquote><p>Whatever. </p><p>The case was proven to the Select Committee and Minister. You and Scotty seemed to disapprove. And yet I still see no compelling argument that stacks…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:17:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161498#post161498</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161498#post161498</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Don't you just love it when an industry says 'no' but the lawyers still want to shove something down your throats?</p></blockquote><p>Don, I joined this conversation in good faith. My intention was no more than to offer up a few clarifications based on my knowledge and experience from inside the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:07:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161492#post161492</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161492#post161492</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Don't you just love it when an <a href="http://nzoss.org.nz/news/2010/nz-computer-society-software-patents" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">industry says 'no'</a> but the lawyers still want to shove something down your throats?</p><p>I'm obvisouly getting too old but I consider 1991 and 1995 pretty recent, even in software terms. This experiement with patents where they should not been allowed has been…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:43:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161490#post161490</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161490#post161490</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						From my point of view the problem with ACTA is no different to my problem with patents in general, it is the province of the wealthy (individual or corporation) If you have enough money "All of your patent are belong to us". The reason for the secrecy is the same…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:26:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161482#post161482</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161482#post161482</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Firstly, a wee air-clearing session.</p><p>It is entirely possible to be appalled at the bully-boy tactics applied in the ACTA negotiations, but also a the same time not think that patents/copyright/intellectual property are evil concepts and should be abolished.</p><p>It's not a black/white, zero/one, on/off, with/against proposition, 'k? I'm not…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:09:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161477#post161477</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161477#post161477</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p><em>skilled practitioner, and the innovative steps are rarely significant.</em></p><p>I have to disagree there. Obvious does not necessarily equal logic, or the other way round.</p></blockquote><p>Maybe not, but that's not what's required. For the purpose of examining patents, it is assumed that the innovative step must not be obvious to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:58:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161469#post161469</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161469#post161469</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>There is very little in software that doesn't qualify as obvious to a skilled practitioner, and the innovative steps are rarely significant.  </blockquote>I have to disagree there. Obvious does not necessarily equal logic, or the other way round. Some human brains cannot get past an (if x then y) statement…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:28:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161454#post161454</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161454#post161454</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The Herald <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/technology/news/article.cfm?c_id=5&amp;objectid=10638108&amp;pnum=0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">has a Wellington Declaration story</a>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:06:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161450#post161450</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161450#post161450</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Which was driven by political interference.</p></blockquote><p>Exactly, what Pharmac usually avoids</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:54:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161447#post161447</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161447#post161447</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I've said what I wanted to say.</p></blockquote><p>But sadly, like many patent lawyers, presented no evidence to justify extending the what should be a limited privilege of patents to software.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:32:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161446#post161446</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161446#post161446</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>(cough) Herceptin (cough)</p></blockquote><p>Yeah that was the govt, not Pharmac though. Playing politics with drugs money, bad form.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:32:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ScottY</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161443#post161443</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161443#post161443</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>You are the one arguing for a special case, not me.</p></blockquote><p>Not at all. All inventions are potentially patentable if they meet certain criteria, regardless of their field of technology. You are saying that there should be an exception for software. That means you're the one who wants software treated…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:23:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161441#post161441</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161441#post161441</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p><em>However government money is not spent on expensive fashionable versions of drugs. Or on expensive drugs of limited value.</em></p><p>(cough) Herceptin (cough)</p></blockquote><p>Which was driven by political interference. That was about the first act of interfering in public service decisions that National carried out once they took the reins.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:22:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161437#post161437</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161437#post161437</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>However government money is not spent on expensive fashionable versions of drugs. Or on expensive drugs of limited value.</p></blockquote><p>(cough) Herceptin (cough)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:57:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161435#post161435</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161435#post161435</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>ps. could you do the same for national standards please. ;-)</p></blockquote><p>Hah! Actually, though, I didn't think the NZEI leflet was too bad.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:47:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>tim kong</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161434#post161434</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161434#post161434</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Signed yesterday.</p><p>And like others wanted to give a hat-tip to Nat and those at publicACTA, for the work they put into crafting the Wellington Declaration.</p><p>I am still not sure on all of the details of the ACTA &ndash; but am wary of the implications. </p><p>As a non-expert, it…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:43:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>recordari</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161433#post161433</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161433#post161433</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>What they have to do is decide which treatments will result in fewer deaths. And then they recommend that government money be only spent on the least lethal treatments.</p></blockquote><p>I'm guessing Pharmac might prefer to say 'most effective', rather than 'least lethal', but harm minimisation is at least one of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:29:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161426#post161426</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161426#post161426</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>There's nothing special about IT.</p></blockquote><p>Agreed. You are the one arguing for a special case, not me. This is why software doesn't need the "special" treatment patents give. There is "nothing special" about law either but I don't see too many lawyers rushing to have patents apply to special defences.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:47:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161424#post161424</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161424#post161424</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>They are not perfect, but they are at least providing an essential gatekeepers role.</p></blockquote><p>Apologies for the rant :).</p><p>Assuming I understand you correctly and you are referring to Pharmac, I think there is a general misunderstanding of what Pharmac is required to do. They aren't gatekeepers. What they have…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:40:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161418#post161418</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161418#post161418</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>All NZ IT companies are small in this context.</p></blockquote><p>All NZ companies, barring one of two of the larger corporates, are small in this context.</p><p>There's nothing special about IT.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:24:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161417#post161417</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161417#post161417</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>do you know if other industries use patent tit-for-tat in disputes like large software companies seem to?</p></blockquote><p>Yes. Large corporates in <strong>all</strong> fields will spend millions of dollars amassing huge portfolios of patents that may or may not be valid. Thier competitors do the same. Litigating any one of them…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:19:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161415#post161415</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161415#post161415</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I realise this threadjack has gone on too long</p></blockquote><p>Well, these issues are important and interconnected. Patents are particularly harmful to those of us who work in the software industry. Not a single line of new code has ever *not* been written due to copyright. On the other hand, lots…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:09:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ScottY</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161413#post161413</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161413#post161413</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Ignoring trademark, since it's aimed entirely differently, and software, since that's a ground of significant contention, which new inventions get multiple grounds of protection? Plant species? Not last I knew. Mechanical devices? Nope. Circuit boards? Nope. Embedded systems? Arguably, though the copyright protection is pretty minimal and there's recognition of…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:04:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161410#post161410</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161410#post161410</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And dual protection is not at all unique. Most new inventions involve more than one form of IP.</p></blockquote><p>Ignoring trademark, since it's aimed entirely differently, and software, since that's a ground of significant contention, which new inventions get multiple grounds of protection? Plant species? Not last I knew. Mechanical devices?…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 08:35:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ScottY</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161406#post161406</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161406#post161406</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I realise this threadjack has gone on too long, so I'll keep it brief and call it a day.</p><blockquote><p>Software did not have patents until very recently and it would be unique to have dual protection.</p></blockquote><p>Software patents have been around since the 1970s. They're not that new. </p><p>There is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 06:40:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Harris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161400#post161400</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161400#post161400</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						:-p
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:45:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161398#post161398</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161398#post161398</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yay, we winkled Mark out of PAS retirement
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:25:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Harris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161396#post161396</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161396#post161396</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Damn, Don got in before me.</p><p>ScottY, he's right, you can't have it both ways with copyright and patent covering software and NOT claim it is a "special case".  There is quite a lot of research into the economic disincentive caused by software patents. Google is your friend.</p><p>But I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:19:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161394#post161394</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161394#post161394</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>No, but then I'm not the one arguing that the software industry should be a special case.</p></blockquote><p>Actually, you are. Software did not have patents until very recently and it would be unique to have dual protection. Patents *are* special, not the norm. They are a privilege, an artificial monopoly,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:35:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ScottY</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161390#post161390</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161390#post161390</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>As a matter of interest, do you know if other industries use patent tit-for-tat in disputes like large software companies seem to?</p></blockquote><p>Large corporates will often play games when confronted with potential patent litigation &ndash; irrespective of the field.</p><blockquote><p>Maybe that the lifetime of software is so brief that patents…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:54:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161389#post161389</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161389#post161389</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It just happens that the groups opposed to software patentability are more vocal and better organised than other anti-patent groups.</p></blockquote><p>You think? Or maybe it's just that the evidence in favour of s/w simply doesn't stack up. That was certainly the conclusion of the Commerce Select Committee who heard the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:48:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161386#post161386</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161386#post161386</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>do you know if other industries use patent tit-for-tat in disputes like large software companies seem to?</p></blockquote><p>Almost certainly they do, it's just that non-software patents are far less controversial so it's not such big news.<br />The big thing about software is that the barrier to entry to the global…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:28:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161384#post161384</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161384#post161384</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>There is nothing inherently special about the software industry.</p></blockquote><p>Maybe that the lifetime of software is so brief that patents are ridiculously too long to be of anything other than inhibitive use? Or how about that software <em>is</em> a literary work,and thus should not be burdened by the restrictions on…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:06:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161383#post161383</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161383#post161383</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks, Scott. As a matter of interest, do you know if other industries use patent tit-for-tat in disputes like large software companies seem to?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:01:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ScottY</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161382#post161382</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161382#post161382</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'm going to assume that you are in fact familiar with the case against software patents &mdash; it's not exactly a new argument for those of us who care about such things :D</p></blockquote><p>I am indeed familiar with the arguments against software patentability. I just happen to disagree with most…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:54:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161381#post161381</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161381#post161381</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Fhui ?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:53:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161379#post161379</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161379#post161379</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						One of my great regrets is I will never make a Foo-hui &ndash; and never meet Nat-BUT! The worknword goes on-
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:25:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161376#post161376</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161376#post161376</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Exactly &ndash; much respect
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:56:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161375#post161375</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161375#post161375</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p><em>The Wellington Declaration is a beautiful, clear piece of writing.</em></p><p>That it is.</p></blockquote><p>And how much more special is it that it was collaboratively written, via a moderator, in a public meeting? Nat Torkington rocks.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:47:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161374#post161374</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161374#post161374</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Visiting Canadian expert Michael Geist was interviewed about ACTA on Radio NZ this morning (<a href="http://static.radionz.net.nz/assets/audio_item/0009/2264661/ntn-20100412-0915-Anti-Counterfeiting_Trade_Agreement-m048.asx" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">streaming, 27 minutes</a>).
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:45:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161373#post161373</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161373#post161373</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Signatures have topped 3,000. Only about another 12 hours before it's presented &ndash; so please read and sign the Wellington Declaration now, and tell your friends the same.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:43:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161371#post161371</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161371#post161371</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I am also tempted to ask what is so wonderful about that particular development, but I fear a copyright flamewar would erupt</p></blockquote><p>Basically, with software, because the field is so large and so fast-moving, it's impossible to search exhaustively for prior art or prior patents &ndash; often, someone will patent…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:40:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161370#post161370</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161370#post161370</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The Wellington Declaration is a beautiful, clear piece of writing</p></blockquote><p>That it is.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:36:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161369#post161369</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161369#post161369</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Totally agree, no benefits to smaller players &ndash; and frankly that's our whole industry at this stage. Software is already covered by copyright, so business-process-type patents just add another layer of complexity, slowness and expense without benefitting NZ developers or worldwide consumers whatsoever.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:32:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161352#post161352</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161352#post161352</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I am also tempted to ask what is so wonderful about that particular development, but I fear a copyright flamewar would erupt</p></blockquote><p>Particularly for a country that is full of tiny software houses, software patents are a significant hindrance to innovation. They're frequently very broad in description, and often used…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:08:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161351#post161351</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161351#post161351</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Ah but it's a familiar screwing..
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:57:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161350#post161350</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161350#post161350</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It still amazes me that when we look at the rest of the world with Free Trade Agreements with the US, that we still want one. Go on, take everything.</p></blockquote><p>What amuses me is the people who were so thoroughly opposed to our FTA with China, convinced we would be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:54:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Harris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161349#post161349</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161349#post161349</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						With Biden, who is so far up the copyright industries' fundamental orifices, it's a wonder his feet still touch the ground.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:50:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161347#post161347</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161347#post161347</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Quite. And Key is <a href="http://www.3news.co.nz/Keys-White-House-meeting-pretty-special/tabid/419/articleID/150636/Default.aspx?ArticleID=150636" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">over there early</a>, negotiating away.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:42:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>recordari</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161345#post161345</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161345#post161345</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It has been suggested elsewhere (sorry no refs for now) that any 'Free' Trade Agreement with the USA will demand Pharmac's scalp</p></blockquote><p>This is what I was afraid of.  They are not perfect, but they are at least providing an essential gatekeepers role.</p><p>It still amazes me that when we…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:33:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161344#post161344</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161344#post161344</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Scott: assuming the <a href="http://en.swpat.org/wiki/201001_acta.pdf_as_text" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">leaked text</a> is accurate, patent infringement is mentioned, although software patents specifically are not mentioned.</p><p>I'm going to assume that you are in fact familiar with the case against software patents &mdash; it's not exactly a new argument for those of us who care about such things…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:15:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Harris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161343#post161343</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161343#post161343</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>@recordari<br />Under US law, any drugs that are not registered with the FDA can be regarded as counterfeit and seized at the border. So you can legally buy a cheaper, generic drug in Canada and have it confiscated as counterfeit as you cross the US border.</p><p>As for this Government's…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:08:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ScottY</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161340#post161340</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161340#post161340</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Oh, and ACTA as it stands could see this wonderful development overturned</p></blockquote><p>I'd be interested to hear exactly why you think ACTA threatens that development. I hadn't heard this issue raised before in relation to ACTA.</p><p>(I am also tempted to ask what is so wonderful about that particular development,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:57:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161335#post161335</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161335#post161335</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Hardly an expert on medicines policy but I recall reading that some ACTA drafts try to classify generic phamaceuticals as forbidden counterfeits, thus providing another avenue to force buying of only the more expensive (and profitable) branded drugs.  </p><p>In broader terms the pharma industry detests NZ's centralised Pharmac drug-purchasing agency…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:51:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161332#post161332</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161332#post161332</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Good one, Martin Lindberg -I really must get back to reading BoingBoing more often.</p><p>And thanks Don Christie &ndash; it'd be nice to learn other writers et al are prepared to poke their heads above the parapets (have sent Russell's original post around to people who may be interested, including…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:39:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Martin Lindberg</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161329#post161329</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161329#post161329</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						May get a few signatures from the <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2010/04/11/sign-the-publicacta.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">BoingBoing</a> crowd.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:20:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>recordari</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161326#post161326</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161326#post161326</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Er, did you check the date on that one? Little geek humour there ...</p></blockquote><p>Whoops... The dangers of clicking on links before looking at the 'big picture'.  </p><p>Still can't fully understand the link between ACTA and Pharmac as yet though.  But clearly my cognitive abilities are compromised at present.  Mansplain…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:56:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161321#post161321</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161321#post161321</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And are the Europeans doing themselves any favours when they complain about the use of baseball analogies by saying;</p></blockquote><p>Er, did you check the date on that one? Little geek humour there ...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:37:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>recordari</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161315#post161315</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161315#post161315</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>What is entirely realistic is that US interests could see Pharmac gutted (as was demanded of Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme as a condition of AUS-FTA)</p></blockquote><p>Could someone in the know elaborate on this?  Also on what do you base the assumption that this government wants to get rid of it?…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:09:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161307#post161307</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161307#post161307</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Oh, and ACTA as it stands could see <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/3570621/Power-to-delete-software-patents" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this wonderful development</a> overturned. We're now leading the developed world on the matter, but ACTA could force NZ to re-allow them.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:42:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161300#post161300</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161300#post161300</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thank you Islander. It means a lot to have people of your reputation understanding the issues.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:04:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161295#post161295</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161295#post161295</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Eminently sensible declaration. Signed it. </p><p>Don't believe for a second it will be adopted :(.</p><p>The loss of pharmac has always been part of this government's agenda anyway and that it will cost New Zealand more than we can afford matters not a whit to Key et al.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 13:44:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161293#post161293</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161293#post161293</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						When ACTA first came to public notice, people were worrying that they'd be stopped at the border so their MP3 player could be searched for contraband music. I pooh-poohed them then, and I'm glad I did. The reality of ACTA is far, far scarier than any unrealistic suggestion that customs…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 13:31:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161288#post161288</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161288#post161288</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>James Francis wrote</p><p>"Read. Signed. Sent.<br />Thank you."</p><p>Ditto.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:14:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Roger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161286#post161286</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161286#post161286</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Well done, a great piece of work and a credit to all.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:51:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Francis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161282#post161282</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161282#post161282</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Read. Signed. Sent.</p><p>Thank you.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:29:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161278#post161278</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161278#post161278</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The Wellington Declaration is a beautiful, clear piece of writing, and I recommend it to anyone here who cares about our online future. It's really that important. </p><p>ACTA is designed to undermine previously negotiated intellectual property agreements. It has big implications for New Zealand with our current government desperate to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:15:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161273#post161273</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161273#post161273</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						+1 for everything Don said. It's also about our right to transparency in the creation of <em>any</em> legislation.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:47:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161271#post161271</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161271#post161271</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Russell, that is an excellent and succinct summary of the Wellington Declaration.</p><p>This ACTA treaty really does affect all of us in many ways, it is not just about counterfeiting, indeed, counterfeiting hardly gets a look in. It is about our future access to reasonably priced health treatments, knowledge dissemination,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:37:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161270#post161270</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-wellington-declaration/?p=161270#post161270</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:37:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
