<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Hard News: The Universal Intercept</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=45413#post45413</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=45413#post45413</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I just read in Newsweek that Obama wrote the speech himself.</p></blockquote><p>It had so much personal experience in it I think he was the only one that could do the job. A speech writer no matter how good would have introduced a few false notes and he had to nail…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:09:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=45385#post45385</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=45385#post45385</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Obama's chief speech writer, is Jon Favreau.</p></blockquote><p>I just read in Newsweek that Obama wrote the speech himself. (I'm sure Favreau helped him, but still... pretty impressive.)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:17:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=45349#post45349</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=45349#post45349</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The daily show last night had the funniest clip of Bush talking about the economy, and the reasons why it's gone belly-up. He basically listed all the crap that has happened while he's been in office. The look on Jon Stewart's face as classic. His comment was "I've been paying…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:07:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=45344#post45344</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=45344#post45344</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>that era is just a bit of an anomaly</p></blockquote><p>Oh, I think Clinton was a badass speaker too. By 'era' I'm just talking about the latest dude. Seven-plus years is a long enough goddamned time to listen to the dubious vocal stylings of George W. Bush.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:49:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=45339#post45339</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=45339#post45339</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The era of ridiculous simplistic repetitiveness in presidential speechmaking can't end soon enough.</p></blockquote><p>If you consider <a href="http://www.afn.org/~dks/race/clinton-e6.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Democrats</a> that era is just a bit of an anomaly.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:39:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=45336#post45336</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=45336#post45336</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But it is a beautifully written and balanced attempt to take a much loftier view of the issue, while framing it in words that all sides of the divide can (should?) understand.</p></blockquote><p>I am so pathetically grateful to have someone running for president who can carry off a speech that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:27:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=45332#post45332</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=45332#post45332</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Yet sadly, there are already plenty of entrenched views from the Clinton or Republican support bases who have completely dismissed the speech as nothing but empty, evasive words. No matter what happens between now and November, no matter what scandals are dredged up, many people have simply made up their…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:18:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Llewellyn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=45327#post45327</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=45327#post45327</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Sure, but I was more impressed by the substance under the rhetoric.</p></blockquote><p>Absolutely &ndash; sorry I didn't mean to imply it was a triumph of style over substance at all. But it is a beautifully written and balanced attempt to take a much loftier view of the issue, while framing…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:06:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=45321#post45321</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=45321#post45321</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Dunno if it will make any difference with regards to the bruising fight to the death that he is engaged in with Hillary, but that is one mighty fine piece of rhetoric.</p></blockquote><p>Sure, but I was more impressed by the substance under the rhetoric.  Sorry for using a disgraceful cliché,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:54:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=45314#post45314</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=45314#post45314</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yeah. Obama's chief speech writer, is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/20/fashion/20speechwriter.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jon Favreau</a>. He's 26. His two assistants are 26, and 30.</p><p>Not bad really.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:40:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Llewellyn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=45292#post45292</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=45292#post45292</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Think of the candidate what you will (and I am a fan), but as a sometime speech-writer, I am <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/mar/18/barackobama.uselections20081" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">damn impressed with Obama's latest effort</a></p><p>Dunno if it will make any difference with regards to the bruising fight to the death that he is engaged in with Hillary, but that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:39:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>daleaway</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=45037#post45037</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=45037#post45037</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Slightly OT, but by golly here's a gripping piece of reporting by Greg Palast on the Spitzer downfall, the sub-prime mortgage scandal, and the latest sleight of hand by the Bush administration, and why they may be all part of the same story: <br /> <a href="http://www.gregpalast.com/elliot-spitzer-gets-nailed/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.gregpalast.com/elliot-spitzer-gets-nailed/</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 13:05:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44986#post44986</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44986#post44986</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But I see very little criticism of Clinton based on her policies, rather it's she's supposedly divisive, she'll cause the Dems to lose etc.</p></blockquote><p>Well, I think we're going to have to agree to disagree on the first part of that &mdash; because after running the '3 am' ad, I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 09:23:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44971#post44971</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44971#post44971</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And I prefer to get my fiction from novelists not pollsters.</p></blockquote><p>I completely agree to an extent, Kerry was 14% ahead of Bush at this stage of the election cycle, but besides our own personal preferences, the polls are the only form of factual evidence in any Who Will Beat…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 10:31:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44951#post44951</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44951#post44951</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>OK, the polling got that one right according to most sources. The Supreme Court however...</p></blockquote><p>Well, since you brought that up &mdash; you'd think the 2000 election, and Bush v. Gore, would have put paid to the notion that 'small' states don't matter.  After all, if Gore had carried his…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:35:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44942#post44942</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44942#post44942</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>we'd be eagerly awaiting President Gore's valedictory.</p></blockquote><p>OK, the polling got that one right according to most sources. The Supreme Court however...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 03:33:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44940#post44940</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44940#post44940</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>You can go by the Readers Digest version, I perfer some facts.</p></blockquote><p>And I prefer to get my fiction from novelists not pollsters.  Remember, Neil, if the polls at this point in an electoral cycle were reliable  Neil Kinnock would have become Prime Minister of Great Britain in 1992, John…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 01:43:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44928#post44928</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44928#post44928</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Just maybe having a woman as President of the most powerful country in the world might do something for the disenfranchised and savagely oppressed women of some of those countries.</p></blockquote><p>Oh yes, quite possibly. And that would be a good thing.</p><p>But the original article was talking about the perception…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:47:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44925#post44925</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44925#post44925</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Do you mean dailykos? There's always been a strong anti-Clinton faction out there but there are pro-Clinton sites (or at least not so partisan) too such as TalkLeft.</p></blockquote><p>I mean Americablog, Huffpo, Buzzflash and Kos: a <em>really</em> big netroots bloc between them &mdash; three of them are probably in the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:10:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44919#post44919</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44919#post44919</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>You can go by the Readers Digest version, I perfer <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/national.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">some facts</a>.</p><p>Both Obama and Clinton ahead of McCain by 1.5% but Clinton gets <em>more</em> votes than Obama. (That's matched by a slight corresponding increase in votes for McCain).</p><p>So the famous divisiveness that the Obama camp claims to be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:34:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44915#post44915</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44915#post44915</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The Readers Digest version:</p><p>Who's the big winner from all the crap flowing from the Clinton campaign.</p><p>McCain.</p><p>Now, as long as he doesn't lose his mind and select Romney as his running mate, I can live with a world in which John and Cindy are the tenants of 1600…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:54:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44914#post44914</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44914#post44914</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I think not, Craig.</p><p>Seems to me she said [paraphrase]: If our opponents are going to run with an "experience counts" message, why would we want to stand a rookie up against them?</p></blockquote><p>Perhaps, daleway, but I decided to take what she said at face value.  And perhaps I'm a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:49:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Deborah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44902#post44902</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44902#post44902</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Let me put two things together....</p><blockquote><p>Partially because no country is 90% women, partially because most world leaders are male, and partially because of who she is and who she's married to, there won't be so much interest from countries in having Clinton get elected.</p></blockquote><blockquote><p>And in terms of major…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:50:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44900#post44900</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44900#post44900</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>It was this that I thought wildly extravagant &ndash;</p><blockquote><p>His election would also &ndash; far, far more than the election of another war-mongering white man, and yes, even considerably more than the election of a woman &ndash; send an unimaginably powerful message to the rest of the world, where most…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:49:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44897#post44897</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44897#post44897</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But you and Tomasky offer no evidence that this would be true.</p></blockquote><p>I think we've covered this ground. So, up to you what you think really.</p><blockquote><p>I find the mix of wildly extravagent claims of Obama's future success combined with quite vicious attacks on Clinton such as by Michael Tomasky…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:21:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44895#post44895</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44895#post44895</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>So either having a better perception at the country level is going to help...</p></blockquote><p>But you and Tomasky offer no evidence that this would be true. </p><p>Obama could very well have an edge over Hillary in offering something positive to some conflicts in Africa. But it's not like there haven't…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:06:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>daleaway</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44894#post44894</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44894#post44894</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I think not, Craig. </p><p>Seems to me she said [paraphrase]: If our opponents are going to run with an "experience counts" message, why would we want to stand a rookie up against them?</p><p>And as for Muslim reaction to either Clinton or Obama, it's anyone's guess whether they would rather…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:58:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44889#post44889</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44889#post44889</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>but Toamsky is also making the claim that there would be that perception. I'd just like som evidence.</p></blockquote><p>Well it seemed fairly logical to me. But if someone runs around surveying world leaders... good on them.</p><blockquote><p>But you could agrue that someone that could transcend national boundaries might do more…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:47:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44882#post44882</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44882#post44882</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And according to Nancy Pelosi, Clinton also wrecked any chance of the "dream ticket".</p></blockquote><p>Did anyone really take it seriously in the first place?  Perhaps it might have worked, but not less than a week after the 'it's 3am, a phone rings in the White House' ad.  For me, the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:04:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44880#post44880</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44880#post44880</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"If the netroots mean anything.." </p><p>Do you mean dailykos? There's always been a strong anti-Clinton faction out there but there are pro-Clinton sites (or at least not so partisan) too such as TalkLeft.</p><blockquote><p>she'd have destroyed all the goodwill and motivation in the base.</p></blockquote><p>Do you mean Obama supporters? Of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:54:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44877#post44877</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44877#post44877</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Yes but it's not a fact therefore I can disagree. Do you have any evidence that a Pres Obama being black would be better for the world than a Pres Clinton being female? I'd certainly scoff if Clinton supporters made such a claim for her.</p></blockquote><p>You were poking at someone…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:45:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44876#post44876</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44876#post44876</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>This is beyond 'scorched earth', and into Cathargo delenda est territory.. Her and her campaign have certainly given the McCain camp and the far-right enough soundbites to last all the way through to November, so she better win the nomination. Not least for the sake of her own reputation.</p></blockquote><p>If…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:43:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44874#post44874</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44874#post44874</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Kyle, you're missing the point. Many observers have pointed out that Ferraro dismissed as 'sexism' any suggest that she wouldn't have been on the Democratic ticket in '84 if she had a penis between her legs instead of a vagina.</p></blockquote><p>No I don't think I am missing the point. This…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:38:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44873#post44873</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44873#post44873</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>In politics, analysis is opinion.</p></blockquote><p>Yes but it's not a fact therefore I can disagree. Do you have any evidence that a Pres Obama being black would be better for the world than a Pres Clinton being female? I'd certainly scoff if Clinton supporters made such a claim for her.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:38:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44870#post44870</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44870#post44870</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But it's just his opinion, it's not analysis.</p></blockquote><p>In politics, analysis is opinion. Unless someone has done some polling of world leaders as to who they think is going to send a stronger message to the world, it's all just opinion, but it sounded like accurate analysis to me.</p><blockquote><p>Why…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:25:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44866#post44866</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44866#post44866</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Kyle, you're missing the point.  Many observers have pointed out that Ferraro dismissed as 'sexism' any suggest that she wouldn't have been on the Democratic ticket in '84 if she had a penis between her legs instead of a vagina.</p><p>And to be perfectly gender balanced, I'm also shaking my…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:13:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44861#post44861</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44861#post44861</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>vYou're criticising Tomasky for accurate analysis.</p></blockquote><p>But it's just his opinion, it's not analysis. Why wouldn't the election of a woman send as strong a signal? I keep on thinking that the biggest signal is electing a Democrat of whatever gender or race. It will be the policies of the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:01:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44858#post44858</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44858#post44858</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>That's far more than a woman coming from an Obama supporter. What would be the reaction if a Clinton supporter said far more than a black man.</p></blockquote><p>That's nonsense, clearly the election of Obama would send a very strong message on the world stage, particularly to countries whose populations are…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:27:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44851#post44851</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44851#post44851</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>In her clumsy fashion Ferraro is saying many people are supporting Obama because of the symbolism &ndash; the US finally overcomes the past by electing a black President. This view is put forward by <a href="http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/michael_tomasky/2008/03/colour_bind.htmll" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael Tomasky</a> who in criticising Ferraro makes her point more clearly &ndash;</p><blockquote><p>...I am here to…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:52:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44738#post44738</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44738#post44738</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Tussock:</p><p>I'd have been slightly terser in you in Clinton's position: "What a fucking stupid question, Steve, and one I won't dignify with an answer.  But I'd just like to add that I'm proud to represent one of the most diverse cities on Earth."</p><p>And Ferraro isn't only a race-baiting…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:35:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Judi Lapsley Miller</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44612#post44612</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44612#post44612</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Doh! Wrong thread...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:18:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Judi Lapsley Miller</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44609#post44609</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44609#post44609</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Russell said</p><blockquote><p>They're probably not deals for your mum, but for communications-happy households they're a welcome innovation.</p></blockquote><p>WTF? I thought we were past this sort of stereotyping these days. Bad Russell! Go sit on the naughty step and have a long think about what you've said. Time starts now...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:16:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>tussock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44525#post44525</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44525#post44525</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Steve Kroft: “You don't believe that Senator Obama's a Muslim?”</p><p>tussock: “I find the whole notion of questioning people's religion to be insulting, but the Senator has made unequivocal public statements regarding his Christian faith and I'm not here to call him a liar.”</p><p>Steve Kroft: “You'd take Senator Obama…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:57:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44517#post44517</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44517#post44517</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Obama wins Mississippi. 11% 0f voters were Republican &ndash; they broke 3 to 1 for Clinton. They're leaving it a bit late to start taking Limbaugh's advice.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:45:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44486#post44486</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44486#post44486</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>I don't know, Kyle. It seems to me that McCain has his own 'Limbaugh Effect' to deal with &mdash; because there's no guarantee the Dittoheads and Ann-droids are going to hold their noses and vote for him, as opposed to just staying home. The hard-right sure didn't bother turning out…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:30:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44483#post44483</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44483#post44483</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yawn... They'll still be an American politician whoever wins.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:18:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44476#post44476</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44476#post44476</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>"... as far as I know."</p></blockquote><p>I don't support Clinton, but this one's been blown out of all proportion. Here's the full text:</p><blockquote><p>Steve Kroft: “You don't believe that Senator Obama's a Muslim?” Steve Kroft asked Sen. Clinton.</p><p>Hillary Clinton: “Of course not. I mean, that, you know, there is…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:30:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44472#post44472</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44472#post44472</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It will be independents that by and large decide most presidential elections in America, in those battle-ground states.</p></blockquote><p>I don't know, Kyle.  It seems to me that McCain has his own 'Limbaugh Effect' to deal with &mdash; because there's no guarantee the Dittoheads and Ann-droids are going to hold their…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:10:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Llewellyn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44447#post44447</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44447#post44447</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Plus, are you sure it was Bill'O? Not Limbaugh? Taking such a partisan position doesn't really seem like Bill'O</p></blockquote><p>Doh! &ndash; you are correct.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:50:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44430#post44430</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44430#post44430</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>If the Dems were determining this, Clinton would likely be winning.</p></blockquote><p>Yeah. There's an interesting debate over that, given most democrats/republicans are going to vote for their own candidate in the general. It will be independents that by and large decide most presidential elections in America, in those battle-ground states.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:46:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44419#post44419</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44419#post44419</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Craig, I just can't fathom the degree of hostility that Obama supporters have for HRC. On the basis of policy &ndash; where there are very slight differences between them &ndash; I can't see the justification.</p></blockquote><p>Neil:  And I don't get the pissy sense of entitlement that exists among Clinton supporters…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:47:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44418#post44418</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44418#post44418</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I think the point may have been that although Obama is leading in the popular vote, he's not leading among Democrats. He's leading once independents and Republicans who can vote in some contests are taken into account.</p><p>If the Dems were determining this, Clinton would likely be winning.</p></blockquote><p>If you're…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:28:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44417#post44417</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44417#post44417</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And Jeff Griendfield has an interesting answer to the question "what does the primary tell us about Clinton and Obama's likely electoral strengths (and weaknesses) as the nominee:  <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2186204?wpisrc=newsletter" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">On the evidence of recent history, not much at alll</a>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:12:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44416#post44416</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44416#post44416</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Graeme, have you had a look at the <a href="http://a9.g.akamai.net/7/9/8082/v001/democratic1.download.akamai.com/8082/pdfs/2008delegateselectionrules.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Delegate Selection Rules</a> that TalkLeft link to?</p><p>It makes interesting reading. No wonder there's a bit of debate over Florida.</p><blockquote><p>...it would also be interesting to see some stats on Dems who turned out to vote this year only because there was…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:12:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44415#post44415</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44415#post44415</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I've heard plenty of people point out that this allows tactical voting from Republicans, who have been exhorted by the likes of Bill O'Reilly to vote for Clinton to ensure she wins the nomination (on the basis that many Republicans believe HRC will be easier to beat)</p></blockquote><p>I think that's…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:11:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Llewellyn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44414#post44414</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44414#post44414</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						On that note, it would also be interesting to see some stats on Dems who turned out to vote this year only because there was a candidate who was perceived (rightly or wrongly) as outside of the party orthodoxy.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:05:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Llewellyn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44413#post44413</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44413#post44413</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>If the Dems were determining this, Clinton would likely be winning.</p></blockquote><p>Hmmm, thats an interesting claim Graeme, if true, I'd love to see the evidence. </p><p>While its true that Republicans and Independents can vote in some states (which is bizarre) I've heard plenty of people point out that this allows…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:59:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44412#post44412</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44412#post44412</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p><em>I think that the interests of the Dems should be determined by the Dems themselves and at present around 50% of them want Hillary.</em></p><p>And may I point out that more than 50% of those who voted want Barrack? He's leading in the popular vote</p></blockquote><p>I think the point may…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:42:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44410#post44410</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44410#post44410</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Craig, I just can't fathom the degree of hostility that Obama supporters have for HRC. On the basis of policy &ndash; where there are very slight differences between them &ndash; I can't see the justification.</p><p>Sure she's gone after Obama &ndash; but he's done exactly the same, that's politics. But…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:34:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44409#post44409</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44409#post44409</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I should add, regardless of the outcome of this fascinating race, I'd have no issue with Clinton or Obama (or McCain for that matter) as Prez &ndash; I'm sure any one of them would be infinitely better than the incumbent :)</p></blockquote><p>Well, I'd like to think the bar is set…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:32:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Llewellyn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44407#post44407</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44407#post44407</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I should add, regardless of the outcome of this fascinating race, I'd have no issue with Clinton or Obama (or McCain for that matter) as Prez &ndash; I'm sure any one of them would be infinitely better than the incumbent :)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:06:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44406#post44406</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44406#post44406</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But certainly the Obama camp is promoting the idea that her even running is an attack on democracy.</p></blockquote><p>Oh, theatre.  Do you think "the Clinton camp" and various proxies could stop screaming 'misogyny' every time she's criticised on policy grounds?  That pointing out her voting record on issues of concern…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:57:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Llewellyn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44405#post44405</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44405#post44405</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Ah well Neil, I don't buy into the Saint Obama view either (he's not the messiah etc), but my take on the Clinton camp behaviour is so different to yours that we must be either reading different sources or coming at it from a different base. Might have to agree…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:53:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44404#post44404</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44404#post44404</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>From where I've been standing, it seems fairly clear that the vast majority of the dirty pool and negative politics has been coming from the Clinton camp -</p></blockquote><p>Obama made a series of TV ads attacking Clinton's health policies. Those ads were exact copies of ads the insurance industry used…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:59:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>rodgerd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44403#post44403</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44403#post44403</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Ahh, O'Connor.  The man who characterised Rickards as an 'isolated incident' in direct contradiction of the Beazly report; who saw nothing wrong with the detective leading the Ellis investigation having propositioned one mother during the case and having sexual relationships with two of the parents of children involved in the…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:22:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Llewellyn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44402#post44402</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44402#post44402</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I dunno Neil, I mean I get that to some extent all politicians share certain expediencies (and most political systems encourage it), but I just don't see Obama and Clinton as having particularly similar styles or MO's (which is part of the reason that this seemingly even-matched race is so…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 21:53:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ben Austin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44401#post44401</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44401#post44401</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>All these CCTVs are useless without intelligent monitoring software &ndash; they could never afford to employ enough people to monitor all the cameras and make them useful tools of halting of crime as it happens. </p><p>Perhaps Skynet will be tougher on crime than our current representative democracy?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 21:35:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44397#post44397</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44397#post44397</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>HRC is a bit of a fighter, maybe shameless.</p><p>And Obama is above all that &ndash; he's going to bring a fresh approach to Washington.</p><p>Except that while he was telling the workers of Ohio how much he opposed NAFTA he had his people meet with the Canadian govt to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:03:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44396#post44396</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44396#post44396</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And here's some more misogyny &mdash; as Snowy defines it: [url|Geraldine Ferraro is shameless trash]]:</p><blockquote><p>If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position. And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:56:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44395#post44395</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44395#post44395</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>vintage Craig, thinly vieled misogyny wrapped in thick blanket of piousness</p></blockquote><p>Oh, Snowy. Two penny minds shouldn't use fifty cent words without looking them up in the dictionary. I'd almost be offended if you weren't so painfully ridiculous.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:30:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Snowy</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44394#post44394</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44394#post44394</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>you've got to have a sneaking admiration for just how shameless Clinton is</p></blockquote><p>vintage Craig, thinly vieled misogyny wrapped in thick blanket of piousness</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:04:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44393#post44393</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44393#post44393</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Completely off-topic, and without vouching for its veracity, I am finding the current Clinton spin about a change in momentum interesting to say the least in light of  this</p></blockquote><p>Richard:</p><p>OK, I've made it pretty clear my preference is for a McCain/Obama general, but you've got to have a sneaking…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:55:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Llewellyn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44388#post44388</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44388#post44388</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Madness indeed. </p><p>Completely off-topic, and without vouching for its veracity, I am finding the current Clinton spin about a change in momentum interesting to say the least in light of <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/3/10/151122/998/240/473676" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> this</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:47:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44387#post44387</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44387#post44387</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Isn't that a Jimmy McGovern script?</p></blockquote><p>It happened to a friend of a friend, in a California town. Madness.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:40:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Llewellyn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44386#post44386</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44386#post44386</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>There are US states where taking a leak down an alley at night can get you on a sex offenders' register.</p></blockquote><p>Isn't that a Jimmy McGovern script?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:30:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44385#post44385</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44385#post44385</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Count your blessings. There are US states where taking a leak down an alley at night can get you on a sex offenders' register.</p></blockquote><p>I didn't think the kind of people who hung around alleys at night looking for dick were easily offended.  My sheltered upbringing shows again...</p><blockquote><p>It's the…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:21:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andrew llewellyn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44383#post44383</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44383#post44383</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Hey you. Stop piddling on the lamppost! Yes, everyone is looking at you now! Yes you look like a dick! Thank you.</p><p>more like: MUAHAHAHAHAAHA.... tiny, <sigh> YouTube will love this one... fark! is this thing on! <crackle></p></blockquote><p>Choose a lampost away from any <a href="http://wellingtonista.com/letterboxes-for-writers-readers-week" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">letterboxes</a>....</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:04:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44382#post44382</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44382#post44382</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm sure they can be used as evidence. I just think the main value of them to police will be in clues. Don't like, btw.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:54:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Che Tibby</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44381#post44381</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44381#post44381</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Hey you. Stop piddling on the lamppost! Yes, everyone is looking at you now! Yes you look like a dick! Thank you.</p></blockquote><p>more like: <strong>MUAHAHAHAHAAHA.... tiny, <sigh> YouTube will love this one... fark! is this thing on! <crackle></strong></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:47:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Charles Mabbett</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44380#post44380</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44380#post44380</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Kyle wrote: "I don't know if that has to do with stuff, or has to do with their deal with the newspapers. I don't think it's any conspiracy anyway."</p><p>No not a conspiracy, just a really bad story that they should be embarrassed about.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:30:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44379#post44379</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44379#post44379</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>i'll never be able to urinate in a public place again</p></blockquote><p>Count your blessings. There are US states where taking a leak down an alley at night can get you on a sex offenders' register.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:15:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44378#post44378</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44378#post44378</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Rich, I don't think using them as proof is the idea. It's using them for clues.</p></blockquote><p>I'm pretty sure they were used as evidence in the Wellington case O'Connor was talking about.</p><p>And the cops certainly (and understandably) wanted to use them in the Te Qaeda cases &mdash;  in fact,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:13:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44377#post44377</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44377#post44377</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						They certainly have been used in evidence. I suspect police would use them for both.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:11:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44376#post44376</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44376#post44376</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Here's some of the story &ndash; unfortunately the entire story has been 'erased' from the Stuff website.</p></blockquote><p>Someone else might know better, but I don't think stuff archives all news stories. They tend to disappear after some period of time. I don't know if that has to do with stuff,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:10:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44375#post44375</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44375#post44375</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm fairly sure I've seen them reported as being given in evidence. Graeme?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:04:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44374#post44374</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44374#post44374</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Rich, I don't think using them as proof is the idea. It's using them for clues.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:44:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44373#post44373</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44373#post44373</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Commented on this <a href="http://www.publicaddress.net/system/topic,990,hard_news_all_this_and_more.sm?i=40#forum-replies" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Saturday</a>.</p><p>Just another demonstration of how our monopoly newspapers have a built-in bias towards authoritarianism, if not explicitly towards the National party (until recently).</p><p>Incidentally, I'm surprised that defence lawyers don't question the admissability of text messages as evidence, considering they can be easily forged: <a href="http://www.smsspoofing.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.smsspoofing.com/</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:32:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44372#post44372</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44372#post44372</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The only thing about a soaked feline that's liberal is the hissy fits.<br />Nah, can't quite see the parallel.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:16:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44371#post44371</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44371#post44371</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Call me a wet liberal pussy</p></blockquote><p>Can I do it in a txt? ura wet libz puss.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:46:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Hubbard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44370#post44370</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44370#post44370</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						A friend who conducts commerce investigations was pointing to an Australian case where the colluding parties maintained separate prepay phones for their negotiations, which ripped off people by $10's of millions. Their position was that removal of txt archival removed a valuable retrospective audit/investigative trail and that if the information…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:43:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Che Tibby</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44369#post44369</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44369#post44369</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The average person can be caught on CCTV 300 times a day. An innovation about to be piloted in 20 areas is talking cameras, enabling anyone misbehaving to be told off by a loudspeaker.</p></blockquote><p>i'll never be able to urinate in a public place again </stagefright></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:38:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44368#post44368</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44368#post44368</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>LOL, that's funny.</p></blockquote><p>Thanks for the compliment, merc, but I wish O'Connor would bloody cut it out.  Call me a wet liberal pussy, if you must, but I actually think there's some relationship between the extremely high levels of public respect for the Police (which the overwhelming majority deserve, IMO),…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:08:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>InternationalObserver</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44366#post44366</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44366#post44366</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>I don't regard Mr O'Connor as a great servant of liberty, and I wouldn't expect him to grasp the potential for abuse of such an archive.</blockquote>Greg was on the TV news  trumpeting about how crims are being prosecuted because of the information retrieved from their cell phones; implying (IMO) they…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:50:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Charles Mabbett</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44365#post44365</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44365#post44365</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Here's some of the story &ndash; unfortunately the entire story has been 'erased' from the Stuff website.</p><p>Sleepwalking into a surveillance society<br />By PATRICK CREWDSON &ndash; The Dominion Post | Tuesday, 10 April 2007<br />New Zealand risks descending into a surveillance society like Britain where people are continually monitored as…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:45:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Graham</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44364#post44364</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44364#post44364</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>It always bugged me that O'Conner would defend officers on issues before any of the facts regarding the case were clear.</p><p>To an extent I could accept it in the role of an advocate where he had to always support the officer in question, until he chose to go against…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:44:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danyl Mclauchlan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44363#post44363</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44363#post44363</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em> "Hey mate, Toni has just told the pigs we burned down the house at Thackeray St. We need to get our story straight."</em></p><p>I like to think our police would still have the acumen to capture some of these criminal masterminds without the availability of archived texts.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:38:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Charles Mabbett</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44362#post44362</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44362#post44362</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Sarah Lacy committed the cardinal sin of trying to do as much talking as her subject. She obviously comes from the this is as much about me as it is about him school of faux journalism. The pity of the Youtube clip is that once the audience gets into it,…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:36:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>barnaclebarnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44361#post44361</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44361#post44361</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The Facebook interview was painful for the first 48 minutes (I was there live and in person.) Mark just kept on repeating the line "Facebook is a platform to help people connect and communicate effectively". Once the crowd turned on Sarah though it was pretty funny. She shouldn't have fought…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:25:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44360#post44360</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44360#post44360</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>SJ said; And should I turn myself in?</p></blockquote><p>The magic internetball says...Yes.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:15:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44359#post44359</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44359#post44359</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I've never been cuddled on account of my hoodies. What am I doing wrong? And should I turn myself in?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:12:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44358#post44358</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44358#post44358</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But does he need to constantly engage in the not so subtle moral blackmail of "either you're with me, or you're a hoodie-cuddling cop hater"</p></blockquote><p>LOL, that's funny.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:10:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sue</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44356#post44356</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44356#post44356</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						the face book interview was rather fun, i watched the train wreck roll in over real time on my twitter feed.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:06:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44354#post44354</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44354#post44354</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I don't regard Mr O'Connor as a great servant of liberty, and I wouldn't expect him to grasp the potential for abuse of such an archive.</p></blockquote><p>Russell, I'd go a damn sight further &mdash; I don't regard O'Connor as a great servant of the members of the Police Association.   In…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:00:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nic.wise</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44352#post44352</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44352#post44352</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>BTW: Kudos to Vodafone's Paul Brislen for having the skills and sense to post information in his official capacity, as he did on Stephen's blog. I wish comms people did that more often, rather than insisting on routing the information through a third party in the news media.</p></blockquote><p>He does…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:00:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44351#post44351</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-universal-intercept/?p=44351#post44351</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:59:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
