<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Hard News: The mathematics of marriage</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Nora Leggs</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=287341#post287341</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=287341#post287341</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Karl Lagerfeld wants to marry his cat</q></p><p>What will happen to Prince Charming when his beloved turns into Sleeping Beauty waking only 4 &ndash; 6 hours a day?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:58:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=287339#post287339</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=287339#post287339</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>the paws that refreshes?</strong><br /><q>Karl Lagerfeld wants to marry his cat</q><br /><q> <em>... drinking nothing but Diet Coke...</em> </q><br />Aspartame poisoning takes many forms...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 07:16:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>FletcherB</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=287338#post287338</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=287338#post287338</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Aw man... just when you thought things were finally coming right for equality and ending of bigotry... turns out te haterz were right!</p><p><a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/news/article.cfm?c_id=6&amp;objectid=10888553" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Karl Lagerfeld wants to marry his cat</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 00:10:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279810#post279810</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279810#post279810</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/8199943/Lobbyist-links-gay-marriage-to-crime-rise-in-NZ </q></p><p>If McVicar's comments weren't so deadly serious, they'd be farcical. Is he on a dry run for a CCCP candidacy?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 18:44:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ross Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279790#post279790</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279790#post279790</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Confirmed: Moron!</p><p>Beware the boogey man.</p><p><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/8199943/Lobbyist-links-gay-marriage-to-crime-rise-in-NZ" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/8199943/Lobbyist-links-gay-marriage-to-crime-rise-in-NZ</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 07:18:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ChrisW</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279778#post279778</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279778#post279778</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Either way, I have my doubts that von Guérard's observations were authentic ...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 20:52:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279777#post279777</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279777#post279777</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						NAH, THEY  were REVERSING SAIL- you can see that by the bloke standing up and the forecrew holding the waka steady-
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 19:50:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ChrisW</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279776#post279776</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279776#post279776</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Way to paddle a waka eh?</q><br />It was quite popular paddling them that way 'round a hundred-odd years ago, even in Kai Tahu, judging by this detail of an oil-on-canvas observation on the upper reaches of Lake Wakatipu by Eugene von Guérard in 1877-79.  ;-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 19:18:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279771#post279771</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279771#post279771</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Goddness gracious!</p><p>Way to paddle a waka eh?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:36:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279656#post279656</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279656#post279656</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Ha! Caught the phobes lying about something! </p><p>According to FF, good fundies "support" civil unions now because they offer substantive relationship equality to LGBT couples in the context of legislative guarantees. In which case, how does McCoskrie explain French antigay organisation Avenir de la Culture attacking the French Catholic Bishops…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:06:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ross Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279596#post279596</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279596#post279596</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Were they collecting for gorse lined gloves in the Self Denial Appeal?</p><p>At Anth: Database logic. Can't fault it.  That guy, gay, gal, gil has thought about it. It WOULD be a bureacratic nightmare. Maybe much easier if we were all just "us's". &ndash; No connections to anyone else inside…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:53:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279594#post279594</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279594#post279594</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Is today Ella Kite’s birthday?</strong><br />The many peeps of many lands do differ…<br />as this old book of mine shows</p><p>1: Peeps at Many Lands – Oceania <br />2: Ex libris plate – Ella Kite<br />3: Title page – 1912</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:19:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279587#post279587</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279587#post279587</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Nice. I was thinking that shit through yesterday, and remembering precisely how normative database design ends up being in practice. Ironically, making the database more and more flexible is a process called "normalizing".</p><p>ETA: Link back should be to Anth's comment.</p><p>ETA2: The comments thread is great, most of the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 11:06:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279586#post279586</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279586#post279586</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Well, it looks like the same-sex marriage equality angle will soon be fixed. At which point, we can laugh derisively at Oz and snicker at how backward they are. That's what you get for electing a Ginger PM, I suppose...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:30:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>anth</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279585#post279585</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279585#post279585</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						These complex relationships that have been discussed suggest that in addition to the mathematics of marriage we need to consider the <a href="http://qntm.org/gay" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">database engineering perspective</a>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:17:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279584#post279584</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279584#post279584</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>It's interesting that NZ recognises polygamous marriages that take place outside NZ but doesn't allow people to enter into them</p><p>It's a bit like my neighbours in California a decade ago, two women who'd been married for years and years (one of them used to be a guy)</p><p>It's like…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:15:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279582#post279582</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279582#post279582</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Stop this at once! McCoskrie is neither heteroerotic or homoerotic! Where are blackout bars when you really need them...? (Mentally visualises one over entirety of McCoskrie) Ah, much better.</p><p>Incidentally, this appears to be the primary source of Bob's ruminations. It's a US conservative Catholic website (surprised? :) ) ,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:02:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279581#post279581</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279581#post279581</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Or you, Geoff!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:59:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279580#post279580</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279580#post279580</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Not after breakfast, please, Gareth!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:59:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Geoff Lealand</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279576#post279576</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279576#post279576</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						You have such a wonderful range of interests, Ben,    I yearn for those days of men's speedos. The only option now seems to be long, floppy shorts which cling to legs in all their clammy horror.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 08:47:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279573#post279573</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279573#post279573</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Like trying to walk up a slip'n'slide and then Bob McCoskrie comes hurtling down in his speedos...</q></p><p><a href="http://www.shorpy.com/node/1070?size=_original" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">I was more thinking McCoskrie First would be coming to the beach with a tape measure</a>.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 01:13:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279571#post279571</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279571#post279571</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yes, perfect, although possible more undies underneath to disguise what an obviously cold day it was. </p><p>Or any of <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/boobob92/3775787865/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">these</a> barring the guy at the back, who is clearly going straight to hell.</p><p>Mind you, <a href="http://www.theretroknittingcompany.co.uk/images/05Aug09/patons2895swa.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this one</a> seems the most dak-proof. And the missus can make it for you, to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 22:58:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279566#post279566</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279566#post279566</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>BenWilson:  Bob McCoskrie comes hurtling down in his speedos...<br />I imagine him to be more of a stripey full body one-piece kind of guy, possibly with a bathing hat.</q></p><p>Something like this? <a href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/234387/news/flashback/winston-churchill-a-life-in-rare-and-memorable-pictures.html/?pid=4808#img" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.anorak.co.uk/234387/news/flashback/winston-churchill-a-life-in-rare-and-memorable-pictures.html/?pid=4808#img</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:23:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279561#post279561</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279561#post279561</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Bob McCoskrie comes hurtling down in his speedos...</q></p><p>I imagine him to be more of a stripey full body one-piece kind of guy, possibly with a bathing hat. You can't be dakked in one of those, and no-one can see your nipples. He's probably not heard of the atomic wedgie.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:57:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279560#post279560</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279560#post279560</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I'd go so far as to say it's a slippery slope and we're only halfway up, trying to get to the top.</q><br />Like trying to walk up a slip'n'slide and then Bob McCoskrie comes hurtling down in his speedos...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:43:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279558#post279558</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279558#post279558</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Now that I've been off and done some work I return and there's so much talking behind my back going on! I am <em>horrified</em> at you people. Honestly!</p><p><q>Moz, I'm curious where you draw a line of calling something a poly relationship, as compared to merely causal and non-monogamous. Is…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:32:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279555#post279555</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279555#post279555</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						LOL, I'd go so far as to say it's a slippery slope and we're only halfway up, trying to get to the top. It's been a hell of a battle, and there's more to come, and it could all fall apart in a catastrophe. But every step further up it…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:21:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279554#post279554</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279554#post279554</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>It really doesn't feel slippery slope to me &ndash; more "split stair like the ones on my deck but f*&amp;$d if I know how to name them"; like this: <a href="http://hgrm.sndimg.com/HGRM/2012/03/09/CI-Advantage-Lumber_ipe-split-stair-deck_s4x3_lg.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Photo</a><br />You walk down one step cause it's a good thing to do, and yes the subsequent steps can lead down to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:01:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279553#post279553</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279553#post279553</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Damn it, the Australian Capital Territory has recriminalised zoophilia, meaning no Aussie states and territories are a soft touch for zoophiles. However, in Arkansas, Louisiana and Utah, zoophilia is a misdemeanour, not a felony.  Zoophilia is legal in Belgium, Brazil, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Japan, Mexico, the Phillipines, Sweden, North…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:49:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279552#post279552</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279552#post279552</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Insofar as I know, zoophile unions are legal nowhere on Earth. However, some jurisdictions haven't criminalised zoophilia/bestiality/animal sexual abuse, including (snicker) some Aussie jurisdictions and parts of the Deep Southern United States (hee hee hee). Think I'll root out (....) the guilty statelets and pop back here...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:10:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279551#post279551</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279551#post279551</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						As for interspecies marriage, I think we're probably a few centuries too early for that. Why do I have a horrible suspicion that the descendants of today's Christian Right will be whingeing about human-alien intimacy, sexual contact and relationships, especially if the aliens in question resemble nonhuman animals from our…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:08:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279550#post279550</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279550#post279550</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Namesake, you left out (deep breath) the Zombie Apocalypse.  Actually, I'm just waiting for someone other than Robert Mugabe to bring that up. And yes, I'm afraid that the Zimbabwean dictator in question did.  Or necrophilia, apparently illegal under Section 150 of the Crimes Act (although apparently a mostly female…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:05:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279549#post279549</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279549#post279549</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Was there anyone that seriously thought civil unions were anything but a nose-under-the-tent for marriage equality?</q></p><p>Well, perhaps I’m a naive old whoopsie but I took the folks who went hither and yon saying that same-sex marriage was totally unnecessary because civil unions were effectively the same thing at face…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:14:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279547#post279547</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279547#post279547</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>As for the Stuebing case, here's the reference:</p><p>Stubing Versus Germany (European Court of Human Rights: 2012): <a href="http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-110314" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-110314</a></p><p>The facts of the case are these:</p><p>As a consequence of family violence, Patrick Stuebing was adopted out of his birth family as a child. As an adult, he was reunited with…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 14:15:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279545#post279545</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279545#post279545</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>No, Greg, that’s ‘consensual adult’ incest, which I’m profoundly sceptical about.</q></p><p>I think, but may be wrong, that he was looking at the definition of marriage equality I was offered, and found that it would include the marriage of siblings (or other other couples within the pairings we currently consider…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:45:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Max Rose</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279544#post279544</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279544#post279544</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>I find myself asking whether or not I would be more concerned for one of my children if she became (1) the sole wife with one husband, (2) one of several wives with a single husband, (3) one of several wives with several husbands or (4) the sole wife with…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:40:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279542#post279542</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279542#post279542</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Ta, that non-monogamy graph you give pretty much sums up why lawmaking around it is a low priority. I pity the fool who tries to sum that graph up in legalese.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:14:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279541#post279541</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279541#post279541</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						No, Greg, that's 'consensual adult' incest, which I'm profoundly sceptical about. For a very good reason- it tends to resultg from genetical sexual attraction, an unforeseen side effect of adult adoption information reforms in the eighties. It means that previously seperated adopted out adult children, and adult children and their…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:00:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Max Rose</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279539#post279539</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279539#post279539</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Ben, this post of Max's might help, where he runs through a few different kinds of polyamory. For me personally, it's more been polyfidelity, where I've had more than one long-term partner at the same time, and that's the model I've seen most with other people, too.</q></p><p>Emma, I was…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:46:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Greg Sands</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279538#post279538</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279538#post279538</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						So is there any constraint at all?  Siblings?  Parent/child(ren)?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:41:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279536#post279536</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279536#post279536</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I'm just trying to find out if poly means more than "sleeps around", in your understanding of the term. Is it a continuum from that to having a polygamous relationship, which presumably involves at least some commitments being made.</q></p><p>Ben, <a href="http://theladygarden.org/2012/01/06/guest-post-polywhaterous/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this post of Max's</a> might help, where he runs through…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:11:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279533#post279533</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279533#post279533</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And while we're waiting for Moz's reply to that, here's a little background on why the Christains are being sneaky and duplicitous about their own polygamist past. You see, it all started with Martin Luther...</p><p>What, Martin Luther, the very founder of Protestant Christianity himself- and an advocate of polygamy.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:53:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279532#post279532</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279532#post279532</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Well, I'm not bi, but I consider myself reasonably well informed about polyamory. But it's a good question- what about polyfidelity? How practical is it? How challenging is it?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:46:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279531#post279531</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279531#post279531</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Moz, I'm curious where you draw a line of calling something a poly relationship, as compared to merely causal and non-monogamous. Is there a line?</p><p>I'm just trying to find out if poly means more than "sleeps around", in your understanding of the term. Is it a continuum from that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:33:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279529#post279529</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279529#post279529</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Moz, what's the debate like within the bisexual community? Other bifolk have told me that it's between serial monogamists and polyamorists. The serial monogamist contingent seem to support (deep breath) monogamous civil marriage equality because it will mean that their own same-sex relationships will be entitled to equal recognition.</q></p><p>I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:22:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279528#post279528</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279528#post279528</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Perhaps a little bit of NZ history: 'bigamy' used to be a lot more common, largely because divorce was next to impossible &ndash; if it didn't work out people would just upstakes and move elsewhere where no one knew them and get married &ndash; usually no one noticed &ndash; but…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:13:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279527#post279527</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279527#post279527</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Oh, and the difference between incrementalism and a slippery slope? Is right there in the metaphor. It’s the difference between a series of steps – any one of which may be anybody’s stopping point – and an actual slippery slope, where stepping on at all means going the rest of…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:02:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279526#post279526</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279526#post279526</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I can't claim to be a barrister or solicitor, but my understanding of the current New Zealand legal situation is as follows.  Under the New Zealand Crimes Act 1961, it is illegal to engage in a non-monogamous or bigamous marriage within New Zealand territorial confines (Section 205). Moreover, this is…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:02:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279525#post279525</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279525#post279525</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Moz, what's the debate like within the bisexual community? Other bifolk have told me that it's between serial monogamists and polyamorists. The serial monogamist contingent seem to support (deep breath) monogamous civil marriage equality because it will mean that their own same-sex relationships will be entitled to equal recognition.</p><p>I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:45:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279523#post279523</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279523#post279523</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						In terms of LGBT political priorities, though, we have other ones to contemplate- most obviously, the further expansion of the Human Rights Act to directly encompass gender identity, with an omnibus bill or subsidiary clauses within ancillary legislation to iron out issues like transwomen prisoners being kept in male gender…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:35:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279522#post279522</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279522#post279522</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>He seems to have been right about the slippery slope of civil unions leading to same-sex marriage, however.</q></p><p>It's a fair cop. Once people got proof that the end of civilisation did NOT occur as a result of civil unions &ndash; then they became much more comfortable about being fair…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:34:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279519#post279519</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279519#post279519</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I think the reason that I have problems with polygamous relationships (as opposed to polyamorous ones, which are inclusive, egalitarian, consensual and nonviolent due to their involvement of bisexual and straight feminist women at their core) is because patriarchal polygynous forms of polygamy tend to involve spousal violence and child…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:29:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Euan Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279505#post279505</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279505#post279505</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I should have added (5) one of many wives with no husbands or (6) married with a sole wife, and in either case I'd have fewer worries than in cases 2 and 4.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:59:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Euan Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279504#post279504</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279504#post279504</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Very interesting posts from all of you on this issue.  I've been married with the same person for over 30 years and no doubt this affects my perspective.  I find myself asking whether or not I would be more concerned for one of my children if she became (1) the…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:57:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279503#post279503</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279503#post279503</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Anyways, as I have said before, being a queer poly person who is pretty fervent about the whole thing ("activist", meh), this is why I don't actually support marriage as a legal concept, full stop. </q></p><p>I tend to think this is why there's not a deafening roar from polygamous marriage…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:06:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279502#post279502</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279502#post279502</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Also this &mdash; " <em>legally you are only one of male/female, married to only one of male/female</em> " &mdash; is inaccurate. At clause 5 the Bill states: “marriage means the union of 2 people, regardless of their sex, sexual orientation, or gender identity”.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:01:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279501#post279501</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279501#post279501</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>He seems to have been right about the slippery slope of civil unions leading to same-sex marriage, however.</q></p><p>With the proviso that his real warning was “civil unions might cause <em>you</em> to change your mind about same-sex marriage”.</p><p>The current bill wouldn’t have been politically viable if there hadn’t been…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:57:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279500#post279500</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279500#post279500</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I hear kids hate nudity</q></p><p>boobs just freak em out</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:57:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Max Rose</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279499#post279499</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279499#post279499</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I hope I won’t be judged for sharing my time between couch and bed. </q></p><p>My couch is my secondary partner, but I've lingered with it for a while longer than I expected. I've had a chat with my bed, though, and it's fine with that.</p><p>Anyway, I've just skimmed that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:47:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279498#post279498</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279498#post279498</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>[Longtime listener, first time caller / Russell et al. coaxed me into coming along because of how “polite” ya’ll are]</q></p><p>Ahem. I believe what I said was “terribly fucking reasonable”. It was Emma who said “polite”. I’m not sure I could cope with having  to answer for what <em>she</em> says…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:34:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279497#post279497</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279497#post279497</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>it might have to wait until after I've had a monogamous 8-hour relationship with my bed.</q></p><p>I hope I won't be judged for sharing my time between couch and bed. One is easier to go to sleep on, the other easier to be asleep in, and much nicer to wake…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:32:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279496#post279496</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279496#post279496</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I disagree that marriage between men and women made same sex marriage easier to implement.</q></p><p>I was being facetious, following your lead. I'm not disagreeing with you, just pointing out that even if there are probabilistic connections along the chain of horrors on the slippery slope, it's still not clearly…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:28:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Max Rose</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279495#post279495</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279495#post279495</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://elisabethsheff.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/polyamorous-families-same-sex-marriage-and-the-slippery-slope-2011.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">This paper</a>  by <a href="http://elisabethsheff.com/about/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Elisabeth Sheff</a> would seem to be highly relevant, but it might have to wait until after I've had a monogamous 8-hour relationship with my bed.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:26:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279493#post279493</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279493#post279493</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Because, for instance, you can still be bisexual and married as a man to a man without subsuming your identity into a gay identity.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:00:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>TracyMac</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279492#post279492</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279492#post279492</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I totally agree that "polygamy" smacks of horrible patriarchal institutions &ndash; despite the fact it's supposed to technically mean "multiple marriage" these days, there is the etymology and associated baggage.</p><p>That's why a bunch of hippie Westerners invented terms like "polyamory", which still gives me the shits with its wankiness,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:54:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Max Rose</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279491#post279491</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279491#post279491</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>You are right that we need data. Among cultures that allow more than two in a marriage, I can think of several that allow polygamy but I can’t think of any that allow polyandry. No doubt they do or at least have existed? It would be interesting to know what…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:48:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Euan Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279490#post279490</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279490#post279490</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What we’d be talking about with legalising polyamorous marriages is legal recognition for relationships that already exist, and to characterise those relationships as overwhelmingly sexist patriarchal one-man-many-women constructs is inaccurate and unfair, particularly to the poly people who are part of the PAS community.</q></p><p>Point taken, and I didn't intend…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:47:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Coley Tangerina</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279489#post279489</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279489#post279489</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I hear kids hate nudity.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:47:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279486#post279486</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279486#post279486</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Oh, and the difference between incrementalism and a slippery slope? Is right there in the metaphor. It's the difference between a series of steps &ndash; any one of which may be anybody's stopping point &ndash; and an actual slippery slope, where stepping on at all means going the rest of…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:42:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Euan Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279485#post279485</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279485#post279485</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So can people please take the time to refer to Bob McCoskrie?</q></p><p>Sorry, Graeme, I thought the K was the correct spelling.  I would never wish to denigrate people in that way.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:41:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279484#post279484</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279484#post279484</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Among cultures that allow more than two in a marriage, I can think of several that allow polygamy but I can't think of any that allow polyandry.</q></p><p>Euan, you mean <em>polygyny</em>. "Polygamy" doesn't specify gender. It's often used as a synonym for polygyny, as Max said, which is why I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:40:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279481#post279481</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279481#post279481</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>There were people who &ndash; perhaps quite sensibly &ndash; ignored the arguments anyone put forward about politics who mentioned Helen Klark, or Helen Clarke. There are people today who ignore the comments of those complaining about (or complimenting) John Keys.</p><p>So can people please take the time to refer to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:36:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>TracyMac</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279480#post279480</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279480#post279480</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Fair enough.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:36:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>TracyMac</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279479#post279479</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279479#post279479</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I disagree it has to be done at "much greater expense" after the initial transition if standard-form contracts are developed for these kinds of transactions rather than the custom ones we have to do these days. (Unless of course we're entering into a heterosexual marriage.)</p><p>But regarding toy-throwing, one can…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:35:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279478#post279478</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279478#post279478</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>As for the remark about “what is marriage equality”, come on, disingenuous much?</q></p><p>I really did wonder how far it went. I found out, for example, that it is not age-limited, but competency-based.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:32:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Euan Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279477#post279477</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279477#post279477</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>but among the people I know who are or have been in long-term polyamorous relationships, more often than not it’s the woman* who has a secondary partner or has more adventures outside of the marriage or primary relationship</q></p><p>You are right that we need data.  Among cultures that allow more…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:30:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279476#post279476</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279476#post279476</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>“When left untreated"… #GoldenGlobes</q></p><p><em>That's</em> what Daniel Day-Lewis looks like?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:29:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279475#post279475</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279475#post279475</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>For that matter, not everyone wishing to engage in a same-sex marriage is gay or lesbian, and it is a bit annoying to subsume those other identities into that when discussing this issue.</q></p><p>I'm not sure how they are not subsumed. The change extends legally privileged serial monogamy to same-sex…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:28:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>TracyMac</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279474#post279474</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279474#post279474</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If someone..., and one also .., then it is perfectly logical ....</q></p><p>Good old modus ponens &ndash; if a infers b, and a is true...</p><p>Of course, propositional logic has nothing much to say if the premises are ridiculous. Sure, you can make a logical proof, but whether or not…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:27:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279473#post279473</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279473#post279473</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If you want to share finances/property/kids guardianship/power of attorney yadda yadda yadda, then make contracts for each of those things</q></p><p>But we're a long way from having that debate. Even Bob McKroskie isn't throwing his toys to that extent. There doesn't seem to be any desire in the borader population…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:23:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Max Rose</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279472#post279472</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279472#post279472</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> In my view it tends to be associated with patriarchy and yes, I agree that in some utopia it might be only consenting adults with just as many multiple husband marriages as multiple wife ones, but I don’t think that’s very likely in our current male dominated society.</q></p><p>That's a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:13:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>TracyMac</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279471#post279471</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279471#post279471</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Also, waffle makers, the four-way ones. Toaster ovens are so <em>mono</em>.</p><p>Anyways, as I have said before, being a queer poly person who is pretty fervent about the whole thing ("activist", meh),  this is why I don't actually support marriage as a legal concept, full stop. </p><p>If you want to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:13:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>B Jones</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279470#post279470</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279470#post279470</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Herceptin &ndash; maybe an attempt to stick a wedge between health conscious older women and the teenagers they're making decisions for? Or a sort of "some of my best friends are female body parts"?</p><p>I would have thought naked jogging is easier on your moral fabric as there's less chafing.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:10:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279468#post279468</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279468#post279468</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Note the weird reference to Herceptin in there. Also, did you know naked jogging is destroying our moral fabric?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 21:58:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279466#post279466</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279466#post279466</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Quite. Russell needs to run a raffle to pay for it to be added. Or tap the pink dollar. Something.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 21:44:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Euan Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279465#post279465</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279465#post279465</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If there was no such thing as marriage, there could be no same-sex marriage. So it did definitely make it easier. </q></p><p>I disagree that marriage between men and women made same sex marriage easier to implement.  In principle there could be a concept of marriage between same sex couples without…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 21:42:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Coley Tangerina</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279464#post279464</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279464#post279464</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						You need to be able to "favourite" things here!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 21:40:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279463#post279463</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279463#post279463</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>McCroskrie put out release on arguments against measures to proactively protect women from cervical cancer</q></p><p>"When left untreated"... #GoldenGlobes</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcb0uSljk4" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcb0uSljk4</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 21:39:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279461#post279461</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279461#post279461</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Kia ora
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 21:34:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Coley Tangerina</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279460#post279460</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279460#post279460</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>[Longtime listener, first time caller / Russell et al. coaxed me into coming along because of how "polite" ya'll are]</p><p>While my whole argument was not to engage with Family First, I sort of wish someone would interview him on why he's against polygamy when it's positively biblical. And when…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 21:26:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Euan Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279459#post279459</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279459#post279459</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> I don’t think anyone here is particularly horrified by polygamy</q></p><p>I am not horrified by it, but I have no wish for it to be part of our culture.  In my view it tends to be associated with patriarchy and yes, I agree that in some utopia it might be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 21:12:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279458#post279458</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279458#post279458</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>One might just as well argue that legalising marriage between a man and a woman is a bad idea because it might make legalising same sex marriage easier.</q></p><p>If there was no such thing as marriage, there could be no same-sex marriage. So it did definitely make it easier. The…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 21:03:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Euan Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279452#post279452</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279452#post279452</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If someone is really firmly opposed to state recognition of polygamy, and one also believes that allowing same-sex marriage will make the argument against polygamy harder to win when we finally get to it, then it is perfectly logical to oppose same-sex marriage.</q></p><p>Logical, but with a false premise.  The…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:32:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279444#post279444</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279444#post279444</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>informed consent is almost unheard of</q></p><p>verily</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:37:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279437#post279437</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279437#post279437</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If someone is really firmly opposed to state recognition of polygamy, and one also believes that allowing same-sex marriage will make the argument against polygamy harder to win when we finally get to it, then it is perfectly logical to oppose same-sex marriage.</q></p><p>Not really. It's a possible strategy, at…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:24:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>anth</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279436#post279436</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279436#post279436</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>From section 2 of the <a href="http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1980/0094/latest/DLM39728.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Family Proceedings Act 1980</a>:<br /><q>marriage includes a union in the nature of marriage that—<br />    (a) is entered into outside New Zealand; and<br />    (b) is at any time polygamous,—<br />where the law of the country in which each of the parties is domiciled at the time…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:22:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279435#post279435</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279435#post279435</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What is marriage equality?</q></p><p>To me, the ability of anyone who can give informed consent to marry anyone who is also capable.</p><p>That's the core requirement for any contract, and I haven't been persuaded that any of the other requirements make sense. I realise that's a huge jump, because our…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:22:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279433#post279433</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279433#post279433</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yeah I would not hold any of those speeches up as exemplars of bold honesty about political goals. But they are accurate: the Government wasn't changing marriage, it was just doing a thing that would make changing marriage later easier.</p><p>I'm not super invested in this one, but in general…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:12:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279432#post279432</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279432#post279432</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And yes, I do love being a dirty incrementalist</q></p><p><q>Like Russel, a lot of them are incrementalists. Take this step, then find a core of marriage-equality proponents who are not strict monogamists to keep the battle rolling.</q></p><p>Which is precisely the slippery slope that McCroskie is talking about. Just because…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:12:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279430#post279430</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279430#post279430</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The debate will be interesting, but it is important to argue about the matter at hand. It doesn’t make sense to turn the debate about same sex marriage into one about polygamy (which is what McKroskie is try to do).</q></p><p>If someone is really firmly opposed to state recognition of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:09:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279429#post279429</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279429#post279429</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Graeme: yeah. But I don’t think anyone was denying that the long run goal was full equality, just that the bill under discussion reached that.</q></p><p>I think there were people denying it. It may have been dissembling, but it was there. I recall a fair bit going on when the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:07:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Euan Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279428#post279428</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279428#post279428</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Through this bill we are widening our society's official sanction of types of relationships, and I am in favour of widening it to same-sex marriage. However, at some point people will draw a line, maybe at polygamy, beyond which they are uncomfortable. The debate will be interesting, but it is…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:02:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279427#post279427</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279427#post279427</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>For that matter, not everyone wishing to engage in a same-sex marriage is gay or lesbian, and it is a bit annoying to subsume those other identities into that when discussing this issue.</p><p>Graeme: yeah. But I don’t think anyone was denying that the long run goal was full equality,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:55:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279426#post279426</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279426#post279426</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Poly marriage would make all the usual things easier. Children, titles, insurance, medical care, fights with families-of-origin.</q></p><p>Yes. That seems evident and highly material to me.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:54:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279423#post279423</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279423#post279423</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Gay-and-lesbian marriage is not marriage equality, and it’s kind of annoying to see someone equate the two in a discussion of poly marriage.</q></p><p>What is marriage equality?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:36:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279422#post279422</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279422#post279422</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Was there anyone that seriously thought civil unions were anything but a nose-under-the-tent for marriage equality?</q></p><p>Perhaps not, but there were a bunch of people denying that it was.</p><p>At the first reading of the Civil Union Bill, Metiria Turei said:</p><p>__“Marriage as understood in our society, and as formalised…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:30:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279421#post279421</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279421#post279421</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Was there anyone that seriously thought civil unions were anything but a nose-under-the-tent for marriage equality?</q></p><p>Gay-and-lesbian marriage is not marriage equality, and it's kind of annoying to see someone equate the two in a discussion of poly marriage.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:26:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279419#post279419</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279419#post279419</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> I've never heard from a polyamorous trio who'd love to be legally married ... why are they silent?</q></p><p>Most of them out of respect. There are many and vigorous voices in the queer marriage movement who want very much not to talk about polyamory.</p><p>So to be heard, they first…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:23:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279418#post279418</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279418#post279418</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Was there anyone that seriously thought civil unions were anything but a nose-under-the-tent for marriage equality?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:16:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279416#post279416</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279416#post279416</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Well Mr McCoskrie tried that argument for civil unions too</q></p><p>He seems to have been right about the slippery slope of civil unions leading to same-sex marriage, however.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:11:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279414#post279414</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279414#post279414</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Marriage ...  property division after divorce, which gets a bit fiddlier when you're talking about multiple relationship ties.</q></p><p>You mean like when blended marriages break up? We already deal with that. It's not unusual to see three or more adults in family courts discussing freely and frankly how they think…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:04:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Robyn Gallagher</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279412#post279412</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279412#post279412</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm always interested that whenever the subject of polygamy pops up, there are plenty of supporters of the concept, but I've never heard from a polyamorous trio who'd love to be legally married (or civil unioned). I'm sure such people exist, but why are they silent?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:44:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279408#post279408</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279408#post279408</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>(More recently someone looked at the links on Bob’s list of slippery evidences and wasn’t impressed)</q></p><p>I shouldn't be surprised &mdash; in my opinion, McCoskrie is not a very honest man &mdash; but wow: Family First thoroughly and grievously misinterpreted their evidence there, didn't they? Rather puts Graeme's (quite proper)…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:30:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279407#post279407</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279407#post279407</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If people like McCoskrie were being forced to articulate an argument in favour of discrimination</q></p><p>That would be good. Public morality is undermined by his lack of integrity far more than by anything he opposes.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:18:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279406#post279406</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279406#post279406</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It's curious that "it's a slippery slope argument" isn't a knockdown rebuttal, considering <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slope" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">it's an informal logical fallacy</a>. Many seem to find them compelling, even more so <em>after</em> finding out that it's such an argument. Which is part of the reason I've always hated the term. Somehow, the imagery it…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:11:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>B Jones</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279404#post279404</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279404#post279404</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> it’s a lot harder to construct a safe and equitable framework.</q></p><p>Marriage doesn't have a lot of real world impact in terms of changing your legal rights in New Zealand, but one of the ways it does have an effect is in property division after divorce, which gets a bit…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:58:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279403#post279403</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279403#post279403</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Well Mr McCoskrie tried <a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO0808/S00123.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">that argument for civil unions too</a> </p><p>The Queer Avengers became his new favorite activist group when they <a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1207/S00417/first-same-sex-marriage-next-equality.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">mentioned</a> polygamy <a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1208/S00490/queer-avengers-were-only-just-getting-started.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">mid last year</a>  </p><p>(More recently someone looked at the links on Bob’s list of <a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1301/S00012/the-evidence-that-polygamy-and-polyamory-will-be-next-claim.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">slippery evidences</a>  and <a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1301/S00013/re-the-evidence-that-polygamy-will-be-next-claim.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">wasn’t impressed</a>)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:57:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279400#post279400</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279400#post279400</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>!!</q></p><p>Fixed!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:52:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279398#post279398</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279398#post279398</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Anyone know of (tribal?) traditions that allow a woman to have four husbands?</q></p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyandry#Observations_and_claims_of_polyandry" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Wikipedia</a> lists some.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:51:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279395#post279395</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279395#post279395</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q> a slippery slop argument </q>!!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:46:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ross Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279394#post279394</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279394#post279394</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>South Africa has some level of recognition of polygamous marriage (the President has four wives, for example), </q></p><p>Anyone know of (tribal?) traditions that allow a woman to have four husbands?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:44:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279391#post279391</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279391#post279391</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Zuma’s also (very probably) a rapist, which helps point towards why polygamous marriage, as an institution often bound up in particularly unpleasant and patriarchal power systems, is a lot more problematic to legalise than same sex marriage. Not that (in my view) we shouldn’t be working towards more recognition, but…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:33:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279389#post279389</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279389#post279389</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Is that a constitutional requirement, or he just does?</q></p><p>He just does. It is a tribal custom of some sort.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:28:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279388#post279388</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279388#post279388</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						p.s. has anyone asked Louisa Wall *why* she opposes state recognition of polygamous relationships? I tried in a Facebook thread (where she had responded to my South Africa point), but didn't get a reply.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:25:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279387#post279387</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279387#post279387</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the President has four wives, for example</q></p><p>Is that a constitutional requirement, or he just does?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:24:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279385#post279385</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279385#post279385</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If people like McCoskrie were being forced to articulate an argument in favour of discrimination – if the framing of the argument was “why discriminate” rather than “why change”, there’s no footing to start the Slippery Slope argument from.</q></p><p>McCoskrie doesn’t think it is discriminatory.</p><p>I also don’t think he’d…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:23:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279383#post279383</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279383#post279383</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What Wall demonstrated when she compiled her mutually exclusive lists of the 11 countries that permit same-sex marriage and the 50 that recognise polygamous relationships is not that extending marriage rights to same sex-couples <em>can’t</em> lead to recognition of polygamous or polyamorous relationships, but that it thus far <em>hasn’t</em>.</q></p><p>South…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:21:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279382#post279382</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279382#post279382</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And yes, I do love being a dirty incrementalist.</q></p><p>We so need a clubhouse and a secret handshake.</p><p>Being someone who's in favour of both same-sex marriage and legalised polyamorous marriage, I've been thinking about this, and I think the root problem is the framing of the argument.</p><p>Same-sex marriage…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:19:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279381#post279381</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-mathematics-of-marriage/?p=279381#post279381</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:19:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
