<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Hard News: The Future of Television</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=300014#post300014</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=300014#post300014</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And where would the good shows that are, or have been, on Choice go? They’ve aired quite a few BBC Documentary series that wouldn’t otherwise have aired free-to-air here, why do you want these gone?</q></p><p>Quite! I don't get that sentiment at all.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2013 14:45:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Morgan Nichol</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=300013#post300013</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=300013#post300013</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Hannibal might turn out to be a slow burner, or it might deserve those low figures.</q></p><p>Hannibal is extraordinary and beautifully shot, and features some of the most disturbing scenes I've ever seen on TV or in movies.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2013 14:44:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299954#post299954</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299954#post299954</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I just wish they’d get rid of Choice...</q></p><p>And where would the good shows that are, or have been, on Choice go? They've aired quite a few BBC Documentary series that wouldn't otherwise have aired free-to-air here, why do you want these gone?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2013 10:21:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299936#post299936</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299936#post299936</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Lets go one step further – what would it take to get PAS as a Freeview channel? It seems like this is a media savvy community that creates content as well as thinking about what and how we all consume – who knows how to set up a freeview channel?</q>…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 03 Nov 2013 18:52:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jarno van der Linden</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299930#post299930</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299930#post299930</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I'm wondering how UFB is going to change the dynamics. The typical fibre plan has enough upload speed to send out a decent quality stream from home. More and more TVs, settop boxes, and game consoles are capable of receiving streams from the internet.</p><p>What is missing is a local…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 03 Nov 2013 16:25:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299929#post299929</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299929#post299929</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Lets go one step further – what would it take to get PAS as a Freeview channel? It seems like this is a media savvy community that creates content as well as thinking about what and how we all consume – who knows how to set up a freeview channel?</q>…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 03 Nov 2013 12:23:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>martinb</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299928#post299928</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299928#post299928</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The other aspect is the aspect of the nation. What things do we do that most people will join together in, have as a shared experience of life in NZ?</p><p>I didn’t realise that the Listener had a monopoly on tv listings untl the 80s- that seems bizarre, but that,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 03 Nov 2013 10:45:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jason Kemp</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299908#post299908</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299908#post299908</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Lets go one step further &ndash; what would it take to get PAS as a Freeview channel? It seems like this is a media savvy community that creates content as well as thinking about what and how we all consume &ndash; who knows how to set up a freeview channel?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2013 16:52:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ken Sparks</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299895#post299895</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299895#post299895</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The main attraction for me with regard to a public service TV broadcaster is the way it respects its audience. Commercial TV channels are predominantly designed to trick an audience into watching ads when what that audience is actually trying to do is watch a programme. Sure there are some…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2013 12:17:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299891#post299891</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299891#post299891</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I was also thinking that the product placement on some shows esp the BlockNZ was so overwhelming that there has to be a backlash.</p><p>When Advertising No Longer Works</q></p><p>A recent trend I've seen on the mainstream news webs is that of auto-play ad videos. As if standard auto-play videos…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2013 10:37:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299886#post299886</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299886#post299886</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Freeview (my digital provider) now has Al Jazeera's twenty four hour newsfeed as one of the options. Great! Now I can stop missing BBC World News quite so much. I just wish they'd get rid of Choice, that ghastly fundie Firstlight channel and one of the shopping channels. Apart from…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2013 08:56:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Myles Thomas</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299876#post299876</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299876#post299876</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Don't give up on PSTV just because it's been virtually destroyed by successive govts. It is still incredibly powerful enabler for democracy, engagement and culture. And it can be permanently resurrected with a switched on Minister of Broadcasting. Yes books, lectures, online to that too but not as powerfully. </p><p>Your…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2013 00:40:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Myles Thomas</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299874#post299874</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299874#post299874</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Research has apparently shown that the older you get the less attention you give advertising. It makes sense. Getting older we are less prone to fads, wanting to fit in or accepting what we are told to think (in general). </p><p>Advertisers want your money but they know their ads are…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 23:51:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Myles Thomas</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299873#post299873</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299873#post299873</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Public service TV doesn't have to be high brow. Look at the BBC. It's about providing a balance, something for everyone, a service. </p><p>NZ public service broadcasting as it exists is filling a massive vacuum with limited resources. If there were more resources then PSB could cover a lot more…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 23:45:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299871#post299871</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299871#post299871</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>emember the feeling of frustration when you walk into the video store and can’t even decide where to begin looking? </q></p><p>For me, this is where Netflix has a considerable advantage over Lovefilm.  The user browsing interface is far superior, and the 'you watched this, you may also like....' on Netflix…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 22:36:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299860#post299860</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299860#post299860</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Lou's ex</q></p><p>sorry, I mean widow</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 20:10:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299852#post299852</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299852#post299852</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>They want to be entertained without having to engage much. </q></p><p>This is a fairly common theory of television, but ever since I started thinking about this stuff I've always been pretty suspicious of it. As a theory it often has some weirdly classist undertones (not necessarily in this thread, though).…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 19:39:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299851#post299851</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299851#post299851</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>All this whinging about TV makes me wonder if anyone is out there dancing to architecture?</q></p><p>Lou's ex</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 19:32:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299849#post299849</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299849#post299849</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I have a colleague who reaches Classics</q></p><p>high shelves are high</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 19:27:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299847#post299847</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299847#post299847</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>For the people who are using TV simply as a form of passive entertainment the idea of having to seek and choose specific content is alienating. </q></p><p>though peer-curation is now an option, rather than everyone relying on the same 'programmer' to decide what they'll like next.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 19:21:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299846#post299846</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299846#post299846</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>mainstream commercial music in 1976</q></p><p>Media engagement was way less fragmented then than now. Any sort of widespread outrage is hard to induce. Though our glorious govt achieved it by threatening to mine in national parks.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 19:19:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jason Kemp</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299840#post299840</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299840#post299840</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Awesome Dylan. Wish I’d read your comments before I added more. You nailed what I was thinking re the veg out thing. </p><p>However I like picking my own content regardless of what that is. I have often ended up as the DJ at the party.  Its the same with TV…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 17:52:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jason Kemp</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299839#post299839</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299839#post299839</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Not really any of those. More that many just turn on the TV and then watch whatever is on  regardless and that often they use the Tv as a backdrop to other activities.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 17:39:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jason Kemp</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299838#post299838</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299838#post299838</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Here is a comment by Mark Cuban</p><p>"TV is becoming a social activity that takes little effort or thought. Vegetate in front of the tube with your mobile device on your lap while you tweet/txt/email/post wherever. Now you are part of the conversation without disturbing the blanket keeping your feet…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 17:36:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jason Kemp</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299836#post299836</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299836#post299836</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks everyone re the "passive" idea. I did mean that TV is a kind of moving wallpaper that is on while people wash the dishes or cook or whatever. </p><p>No reflection on the watchers but where I was going with that is some (most?) viewers will watch anything that is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 17:25:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bmk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299835#post299835</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299835#post299835</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Agree with everything you said. General broadcast TV &ndash; I 'watch' either reading a book or browsing on my laptop/iPad/smart phone. It just doesn't interest me enough to have my sole attention &ndash; or sometimes it does but then an ad comes on and there's no way I'm going to…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 16:55:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Dylan Reeve</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299833#post299833</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299833#post299833</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What does “passive” mean in this context? People don’t think about it? People don’t discuss it? People don’t deliberately seek it out? People who watch mainstream TV aren’t very bright?</q></p><p>It's the veg out thing. For a lot of people TV is something to unwind. They want to be entertained…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 16:13:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299832#post299832</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299832#post299832</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What does “passive” mean in this context? People don’t think about it? People don’t discuss it? People don’t deliberately seek it out? People who watch mainstream TV aren’t very bright?</q></p><p>By passive, I suspect it means "narrow attention span".</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 15:32:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Geoff Lealand</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299831#post299831</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299831#post299831</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I agree, Danielle.  It is a cliche and a misrepresentation of what happens when we watch television.  You might well argue that reading a book or staring at Youtube clips is 'passive'. I have done a sizeable bunch of research on TV audiences along the way and 'passive' they ain't…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 15:19:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299830#post299830</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299830#post299830</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What does “passive” mean in this context?</q></p><p>For me it means that the TV is on and I'm vaguely aware of the program but I'm also doing something else at the same time. Preping dinner or loading the dishwasher or tweeting or reading PAS or reading Metro or ...</p><p>It…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 15:18:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299827#post299827</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299827#post299827</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I think mainstream TV is mostly for passive viewing. </q></p><p>What does "passive" mean in this context? People don't think about it? People don't discuss it? People don't deliberately seek it out? People who watch mainstream TV aren't very bright?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 14:57:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299824#post299824</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299824#post299824</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Consult most teenagers about how they see it.</q></p><p>My son basically never watches TV on the TV. But he probably uses about a gigabyte a day of internet and loves Big Bang Theory, Mythbusters etc.</p><p>It may have something to do with him being a teenager and being in his…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 14:46:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299820#post299820</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299820#post299820</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I watched <em>The Block</em>, off and on, mostly because my wife wants to veg out before bed after a hard day. I felt a tiny bit sorry for the couple that only made $25,000, until I remembered that several of the people in the top 8 on <em>The Contender</em> not…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 14:19:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David MacGregor</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299818#post299818</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299818#post299818</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>All this whinging about TV makes me wonder if anyone is out there dancing to architecture?<br />The media landscape has changed.<br />Build something new that suits it &ndash; and don't make it a shrine to Keith Bracey.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 14:14:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David MacGregor</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299817#post299817</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299817#post299817</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I read somewhere that people's diets are surprisingly malleable.<br />After eating something we state distaste for prior about 14 times &ndash; it simply becomes what we eat and will state a preference for it.<br />We don't eat what we like. We like what we eat.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 14:09:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jason Kemp</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299813#post299813</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299813#post299813</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The 12 yr old in my house amuses me because she likes to read a book while “watching” Xfactor or The Block NZ. Talk to any of them and their TV culture revolves around YouTube and that can be almost anything but it mostly involves some kind of cultural remix…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 13:21:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299811#post299811</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299811#post299811</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>RE: The Block, looks like some elements of the NZ Institute haven’t been completely squashed by the NZ Initiative merger…</p><p><a href="https://twitter.com/nzinitiative/status/396051055655391232" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The NZ Initiative: Kill the property porn shows to fix housing</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 13:04:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299794#post299794</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299794#post299794</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>bergamots...</strong><br /><q>You want people to buy apples? <br />Make them taste like a burger … sigh.</q><br />Hmmmm...<br /><em><Warning NSFV*></em><br />cored apples, <br />with hot pork <br />centres...<br />yum!</p><p>or the applebagel:<br />cored, ringed and <br />bacon layered,<br />lettuce maybe?<br /> just cos...</p><p>&ndash; bun appetit</p><p><br /><em>*Not Safe For Vegetarians</em></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 11:30:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299787#post299787</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299787#post299787</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But at least for me, a sign of a healthy culture is when every damn thing isn’t expected to even try being all things to all people all the damn time.</q></p><p>+1</p><p>My taste is mine. It is demonstrably different from anyone else. There is great art I actively dislike…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 11:18:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299783#post299783</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299783#post299783</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> rubbing it’s hands together</q></p><p>Yeah a bunch of folks made money from that show, pity that didn't extend to the actual contestants. There were some pretty cynical business decisions made. Some of that is understandable given the risk associated with producing such a show but by halfway through they would…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 11:06:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299779#post299779</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299779#post299779</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>basically for squares</q></p><p>Hey! I resemble that comment.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 10:56:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299754#post299754</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299754#post299754</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Sure, but there’s a number of complicating factors. Hannibal (which Three is showing sometime in the new year) is pulling the kind of ratings for NBC that would usually get an expensive network scripted drama euthanized with extreme prejudice. But it works for the network because it is a co-production,…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 09:08:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299749#post299749</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299749#post299749</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Those folk who get sniffy about Shortland Street haven’t watched it for a long, long time. </q></p><p><br />Guilty as charged, but you know what?  <em>Shortland Street</em> isn't really my thing, and <strong>that's <em>more</em> than OK</strong>.  Yes, Russell is quite right: Let's not be naive about commercial imperatives being important.  Always have…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 08:22:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299746#post299746</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299746#post299746</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The Block gets 637,950 out of 4,430,000 for it’s finale.<br />= 14% of the population, and maybe about 10% for it’s regular mid season stuff.</q></p><p>The Herald is now saying <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=11149724" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this</a>:</p><p><q>The final of The Block, which screened from 7.30pm to 9.30pm, was the most watched programme in that timeslot…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 07:16:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299744#post299744</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299744#post299744</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Viewing figures at time of intial broadcast are arguably now much less of a factor than they once were.</q></p><p>Sure, but there's a number of complicating factors.  <em>Hannibal</em> (which Three is showing sometime in the new year) is pulling the kind of ratings for NBC that would usually get an…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 01:27:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Geoff Lealand</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299742#post299742</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299742#post299742</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Those folk who get sniffy about  <em>Shortland Street</em> haven't watched it for a long, long time. I am proud to say it has been one of the more enjoyable aspects of life in New Zealand for the last 20+ years.  I have a colleague who reaches Classics and he would…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 23:52:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299741#post299741</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299741#post299741</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>It occurs to me that one thing that might need to start being taken into consideration with ‘highbrow’ long-form drama series and the like is the slow-burn factor.  Viewing figures at time of intial broadcast are arguably now much less of a factor than they once were.</p><p>‘The Wire’ is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 23:45:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Yamis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299740#post299740</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299740#post299740</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The highest rating program in the USA in the last couple of years has been NFL football on Sunday nights, along with NCIS and they get about 20-25 million viewers a week which is around the 6-8% of the population mark.</p><p>The Block gets 637,950 out of 4,430,000 for it's…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 23:38:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299738#post299738</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299738#post299738</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Consult most teenagers about how they see it.</p><p>The ones I know watch a tiny bit of event TV, often ironically, but mostly don’t watch at all. They are incredibly creative and communal, too. I believe they are what is known as “the future”.</q></p><p>I still think on-demand video will…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 23:02:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299734#post299734</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299734#post299734</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>mostly don’t watch at all. They are incredibly creative and communal, too. I believe they are what is known as “the future”.</q></p><p>I showed my daughter this comment and she went "That's me"</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 22:40:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299730#post299730</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299730#post299730</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I am put in mind of our young fogey commisioner's incredulity at the news that our Media3 TV commentator, Joe Nunweek, did not own a TV.</q></p><p>I recall that, yes. Generation gaps come in all shapes and sizes.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 22:18:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299729#post299729</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299729#post299729</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The ones I know watch a tiny bit of event TV, often ironically, but mostly don’t watch at all. They are incredibly creative and communal, too. I believe they are what is known as “the future”.</q></p><p>I guess the question is how representative are the ones we know. But I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 22:14:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299725#post299725</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299725#post299725</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I always hated Shortland Street, but that is an excellent point.</q></p><p>And while I can sniff at soap operas with the best pointy-headed elitists, it's also hard to miss that they've also been a great training ground for an awful lot of "highbrow" actors, writers and directors.  Art is all…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 21:12:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Chris Waugh</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299723#post299723</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299723#post299723</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And let’s not start on the comedy …</q></p><p>I thought that died the moment Rowan Atkinson decided on Mr Bean.</p><p><q>We also forget that Shortland Street put brown people on screen and made them stars, presented gay characters and had them loved. It’s as disruptive as anything else our television…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 20:56:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Finlay Macdonald</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299722#post299722</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299722#post299722</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Consult most teenagers about how they see it.</p><p>The ones I know watch a tiny bit of event TV, often ironically, but mostly don't watch  at all.  They are incredibly creative and  communal, too. I believe they are what is known as "the future".</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 20:41:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299721#post299721</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299721#post299721</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Consult most teenagers about how they see it.</q></p><p>I am put in mind of our young fogey commisioner's incredulity at the news that our Media3 TV commentator, Joe Nunweek, did not own a TV.</p><p>Thing was, of course, Joe was the only critic of <em>Seven Sharp</em> to watch the whole…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 20:34:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299717#post299717</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299717#post299717</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>There is an unspoken assumption in all this that TV is still the cultural fulcrum it (arguably) once was</q></p><p>True. Broadcast aint the dominant arrangement but we're not adjusting our mindset uniformly fast. Consult most teenagers about how they see it.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:35:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299716#post299716</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299716#post299716</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>can also read a book</q></p><p>or a cave wall, if you're really keen.<br />#culturalfulcrum</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:33:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299715#post299715</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299715#post299715</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So I watched ALL of the block NZ. </q></p><p>Your resilience is admirable. Didn't see one glimpse of the builder I randomly knew was in the background somewhere despite watching at least 50% of the eps. </p><p>Got to know the characters and the tone quite well. Crass product plugs seem rather…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:31:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Finlay Macdonald</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299714#post299714</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299714#post299714</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I know, I know ... But you really can also read a book., There is an unspoken assumption in all this that TV is still the cultural fulcrum it (arguably) once was. There is incredible art being made for TV, yes, nearly all of it for a subscription fee now.…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:31:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299713#post299713</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299713#post299713</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The SPP house style reached its zenith with Outrageous Fortune, but it was born in Ferndale</q></p><p>Snappy observation. #onya</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:27:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>anth</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299710#post299710</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299710#post299710</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>TV in a wholly commercial environment will start to feel pretty weird ... especially if you happen to be in the half of the population that’s not in a target demographic</q><br />Or if you're in the two thirds who are part of such a demographic but didn't watch that show.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 18:57:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299707#post299707</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299707#post299707</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I can confirm the hallowed British Broadcasting Corporation is more than keeping its end up as a net contributor to the global shite supply.</q></p><p>+1 on that. The Beeb has been mostly phoning it in for years on drama. And let's not start on the <em>comedy</em> ...</p><p>Also, don't be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 18:22:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299706#post299706</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299706#post299706</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>yes exactly – that’s why we need public TV if we want anything more high-brow than Shortland St</q></p><p>Oh, Jesus… I’m trying to find one level on which that sentence doesn’t bug the fuck out of me.  I don’t know if you’ve been paying attention over the last decade or…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 17:58:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Morgan Nichol</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299705#post299705</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299705#post299705</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But there’s also narrative reality (things like The GC) and competition reality (like Survivor) and many many hybrids of those and other sub-groups. All are, essentially, documentary in nature though.</q></p><p>Ok, so just to calibrate. Would you say <em>Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen</em> was also a documentary?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 17:39:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Morgan Nichol</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299704#post299704</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299704#post299704</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I remember the first series of NZ's Got Talent being a big Twitter event, but this time around virtually no one in my timeline is tweeting about it.</q></p><p>Part of that has to be that it's noticeably more terrible this season. The talent is very thin. Which has lead the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 17:34:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Martin Lindberg</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299703#post299703</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299703#post299703</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Blood-obs</q></p><p>I'd watch that for a dollar!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 17:31:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299702#post299702</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299702#post299702</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And if Roman-style gladiator matches somehow managed to be brought back, it probably won’t be called “blood sport” or “snuff”. It might be called something like “reality TV like you’ve never seen before”.</q></p><p>Blood-obs</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 17:17:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299699#post299699</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299699#post299699</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And if Roman-style gladiator matches somehow managed to be brought back, it probably won't be called "blood sport" or "snuff". It might be called something like "reality TV like you've never seen before".
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:49:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299693#post299693</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299693#post299693</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						So I watched ALL of the block NZ. We got hooked by the Aussie version. We love renovation shows and while The Block NZ missed the mark on several points for us (really the oldest contestant was 30?) and I seriously HAD to fast forward through Alice's voice sometimes. But…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:33:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299689#post299689</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299689#post299689</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I saw a survey, probably in the last year or so, that covered what people say they want from TV and what they actually watch.</q></p><p>We have the same issue with food. You do a survey about what people want from new fruit cultivars and they say they want healthy…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:12:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299688#post299688</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299688#post299688</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> we're now outside the target demographic.</p><p>So do advertisers really expect me to not buy any different brand for the rest of my life ?</q></p><p>I think that might actually be the problem. By our age Brent, we aren't really swayed as much by advertising lies. We know some brands…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:08:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Elijah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299687#post299687</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299687#post299687</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						never saw more than part of the occasional episode; avoid these enfomercials like dry-rot in leaky homes.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:55:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Elijah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299686#post299686</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299686#post299686</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						This! DeepRed
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:52:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299685#post299685</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299685#post299685</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But there’s also narrative reality (things like The GC) and competition reality (like Survivor) and many many hybrids of those and other sub-groups. All are, essentially, documentary in nature though.</q></p><p>I would strongly disagree that Survivor et al are documentaries in any form. They're unscripted drama.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:38:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299684#post299684</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299684#post299684</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Is The Shearing Gang fundamentally different from reality TV staples like Motorway Patrol, Airline, and Bondi Rescue? Day in the life of group of people employed in a particular line of work?</q></p><p>The big difference between Shearing Gang and Motorway Patrol is who controls the content. Programmes that observe the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:37:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Dylan Reeve</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299682#post299682</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299682#post299682</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Where do shows like those cross the dividing line between reality TV and documentary?</q></p><p>There are lots of terms in use in the industry to separate different types of reality TV. </p><p>Those show would all probably be classified as "obs-doc" &ndash; observational documentary &ndash; it really is not much different…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:34:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299681#post299681</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299681#post299681</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What are these? and is public broadcasting an ideal that makes sense if TV is your only moving media view on the world – aside from films. How does public broadcasting sit in the rapidly expanding digital world ? </q></p><p>There are plenty of good cues from the CBC, the BBC,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:32:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299680#post299680</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299680#post299680</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Is The Shearing Gang fundamentally different from reality TV staples like Motorway Patrol, Airline, and Drug Bust? Day in the life of group of people employed in a particular line of work?</q></p><p>Where do shows like those cross the dividing line between reality TV and documentary?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:24:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Aston</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299679#post299679</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299679#post299679</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><.q> meaningful public broadcasting goals<q><br />What are these? and is public broadcasting an ideal that makes sense if TV is your only moving media view on the world &ndash; aside from films. How does public broadcasting sit in the rapidly expanding digital world ? <br />I find I am watching as much…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:17:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>SteveH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299677#post299677</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299677#post299677</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The mainstream TV reality is that most people who want a ‘lean back’ experience – what ever is on their flatscreen when they get home at night are quite happy with it.</q></p><p>If that's true then the "high-brow" stuff should rate just as well as the reality TV shows, shouldn't…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:44:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Dylan Reeve</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299674#post299674</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299674#post299674</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I am playing devil’s advocate somewhat in these posts – I am a supporter of public television. </p><p>But I don’t think that commercial TV as it stands currently owes us anything other than popular entertainment. For better or worse that’s the TV environment we live in, and expecting it to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:11:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Dylan Reeve</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299673#post299673</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299673#post299673</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The peoplemeter has become a relic of the analogue TV age, and AC Nielsen et al haven’t bothered to update their methodologies &amp; technologies.</q></p><p>They are trying, but it's a complicated business. They are pretty good at measuring the number of people viewing a given show (on air or on demand,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:10:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299670#post299670</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299670#post299670</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The peoplemeter has become a relic of the analogue TV age, and AC Nielsen et al haven’t bothered to update their methodologies &amp; technologies.</q></p><p>What makes you say that? On-line viewing, and time-delayed viewing are no commonly included in ratings measures.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:00:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299669#post299669</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299669#post299669</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>They already do, and a lot of good telly comes out of it. Back Benches, the Exponents doco, the Shearing Gang (which is the sort of awesome series One used to make), and many more. Have a search through the NZ On Air funding decisions.</q></p><p>Is The Shearing Gang fundamentally…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:57:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Dylan Reeve</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299666#post299666</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299666#post299666</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Ahhhhh another person who has become bound by the concept of “mainstream costs”<br />While obstacles are put in the way economic public tv will never be a reality here – or anywhere. There ARE ways to produce television cheaply – get rid of the happy hours ad long lunches for…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:51:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299665#post299665</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299665#post299665</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>a lot of the "high-brow" stuff doesn't attract viewers. Then the cry from taxpayers/government/whoever is "why are we paying for stuff that no one watches"</q></p><p>The peoplemeter has become a relic of the analogue TV age, and AC Nielsen et al haven't bothered to update their methodologies &amp; technologies.</p><p>Also, TVNZ…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:47:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Blackman</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299663#post299663</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299663#post299663</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Ahhhhh another person who has become bound by the concept of "mainstream costs"<br />While obstacles are put in the way economic public tv will never be a reality here &ndash; or anywhere. There ARE ways to produce television cheaply &ndash; get rid of the happy hours ad long lunches for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:35:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Glenn Pearce</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299662#post299662</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299662#post299662</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Was it Akio Morita (Sony) who said something about never do Market Research, just observe people's behaviour.</p><p>Those useless Market Research questions "Would you consider xyz.."</p><p>Of course I'd <strong>consider</strong> it, would I actually hand over my hard earned $$$ for it, maybe not.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:18:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Dylan Reeve</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299661#post299661</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299661#post299661</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The kind of content that aired on Media 7/3 could easily be made with light equipment, very low overheads, narrowcasting through the web and possibly a subscriber model. Essentially podcasting. Other revenue streams like syndication with outlets like the On-Demand channels…who knows, I don’t know the economics.</q></p><p>Media 3 was…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:07:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Dylan Reeve</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299660#post299660</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299660#post299660</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I wish I could find it... I saw a survey, probably in the last year or so, that covered what people <em>say</em> they want from TV and what they <em>actually</em> watch.</p><p>The gist is that while many people say they want to watch <em>good</em>* TV, but in reality they are…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:58:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David MacGregor</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299659#post299659</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299659#post299659</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The mainstream TV reality is that most people who want a ‘lean back’ experience – what ever is on their flatscreen when they get home at night are quite happy with it. I agree with Finlay MacDonald about Netflix solving that problem. For now I am happy that there is…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:55:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Brent Jackson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299658#post299658</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299658#post299658</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Yet I have more disposable income now than I've ever had, surely someone wants to sell stuff to my demographic?</q></p><p>Ditto.  A phone call earlier in the week wanted to talk to a male in the household between 18 and 44 &ndash; can't oblige there &ndash; we're now outside the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:46:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Dylan Reeve</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299657#post299657</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299657#post299657</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>yes exactly – that’s why we need public TV if we want anything more high-brow than Shortland St</q></p><p>It's a double-edged sword. TV is somewhat expensive to make, and, for better or worse, a lot of the "high-brow" stuff doesn't attract viewers. Then the cry from taxpayers/government/whoever is "why are…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:43:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Bennett</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299655#post299655</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299655#post299655</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I dunno, as a Beckettian paen to ennui and the futility of the human condition in the face of universal entropy, Shortland Street does a pretty consistent job.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:39:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Robyn Gallagher</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299653#post299653</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299653#post299653</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If they had a mind to, I'm sure Sky could use their free-to-air channel Prime to access NZOA funding in order to commission original content.</q></p><p>They already do, and a lot of good telly comes out of it. Back Benches, the Exponents doco, the Shearing Gang (which is the sort…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:30:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299652#post299652</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299652#post299652</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Which works well enough in larger markets. And for Sky, which has a hit with high-quality American drama on SOHO. But  it's a big ask to expect subscription to fund local production in a market the size of this one.</q></p><p>yes exactly &ndash; that's why we need public TV if…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:29:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Robyn Gallagher</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299651#post299651</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299651#post299651</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Which works well enough in larger markets. And for Sky, which has a hit with high-quality American drama on SOHO.</q></p><p>The closest thing to a local example? Jane Campion's Top of the Lake screened here on pay channel BBC UKTV as the channel helped fund the production.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:25:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Bennett</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299650#post299650</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299650#post299650</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						If they had a mind to, I'm sure Sky could use their free-to-air channel Prime to access NZOA funding in order to commission original content.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:20:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Robyn Gallagher</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299649#post299649</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299649#post299649</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>TV3 is also doing a magnificent job of what it calls "engagement", which is basically getting people to amplify its reach via social media. There's nothing wrong with that &mdash; I fired off my share of X-Factor Twitter funnies when that was on &mdash; but I was staggered last night…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:19:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299648#post299648</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299648#post299648</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>But fear not – at the same time we see the rise of cable channels, and subscription-based providers like Netflix. They do not have the same demands. They can fund shows on their merit (whatever that may be) so long as their overall offering is enough to keep viewers engaged…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:16:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Dylan Reeve</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299647#post299647</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299647#post299647</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Fundamentally there's nothing wrong with this. The viewership numbers clearly show that people like to watch it &ndash; and in the end TV is basically an entertainment medium. If viewers are entertained by it and choose to watch it then they're clearly doing their job.</p><p>When the business model requires…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:08:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299646#post299646</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299646#post299646</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Fast-forward through that, PVR-owner.</q></p><p>Oh I don't know, I just didn't record it, so I didn't watch it </p><p>(by which I mean I seldom watch live TV other than the news any more &ndash; if you want to sell me ads you're going to have to make something compelling enough…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:00:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Finlay Macdonald</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299645#post299645</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299645#post299645</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Indeed. I've long thought that free-to-air TV has been finding its natural (i.e.commercial) equilibrium by maximising viewers for the lowest possible cost. Reality event TV is the best model so far, and it will increase. But what it also means is that many viewers turn away, download, do other stuff…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:54:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gregor Ronald</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299644#post299644</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299644#post299644</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						More proof that if you're 60+, broadcast TV has very little to offer. Yet I have more disposable income now than I've ever had, surely someone wants to sell stuff to my demographic? I doubt that a 20-something TV producer has any idea about how to do this, though.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:53:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299643#post299643</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-future-of-television/?p=299643#post299643</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:53:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
