<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Hard News: The file-sharing bill</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Leon Tan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=211374#post211374</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=211374#post211374</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						What the Wikileaks information suggests (thanks anth and Paul Campbell) is in fact far worse even that what you propose... (and I do not disagree that there are problems with elections &ndash; I think the long duration history of 'democracy' shows there are other options also, such as sortition). It…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 19:36:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=211320#post211320</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=211320#post211320</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yeah I saw this &ndash; according to the <a href="http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2009/04/09WELLINGTON88.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">US cable</a> the US embassy:</p><p><q>"Throughout the final stages of the law's (near)  implementation, the Embassy continued to met with IPR  stakeholders and GNZ officials to ascertain progress and encourage resolution".</q></p><p>Apparently the government met with the Americans but certainly didn't hold…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 11:26:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=211307#post211307</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=211307#post211307</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I found this out as a result of lodging a complaint with the HRC</q></p><p>Thanks, Leon.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 09:58:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=211306#post211306</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=211306#post211306</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Leon, electing law enforcement officials can go horribly, horribly wrong in so many awful ways that I'm immensely glad that NZ doesn't directly elect its Attorney General. I'll point out that not even the United States, that home of elected officialdom at every tier of civil service, elects <em>its</em> AG.…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 09:41:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>anth</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=211300#post211300</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=211300#post211300</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Wikileaks have released some cables related to the US involvement in creating NZ laws and funding a copyright enforcement unit,</p><p><a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/5769/125/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/5769/125/</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 08:46:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Leon Tan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=211297#post211297</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=211297#post211297</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						'The Attorney-General considered that the special enforcement regime for addressing file sharing was inconsistent with s.14 (“the right to freedom of expression”) but that, as the objective of the legislation was to provide for an enforcement regime for instances of file sharing that infringe copyright, it amounted to an important…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 07:18:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Leon Tan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=211296#post211296</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=211296#post211296</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Giovanni, you read that right, yes, and yes I am saying that the public is not directly electing Ministers, nor the AG. Saying the AG is elected 'just like any other member of parliament' is not entirely accurate. From what I recall of the voting forms, there are instances where…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 07:15:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=211267#post211267</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=211267#post211267</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>According to New Zealand’s Human Rights Commission</q></p><p>Link or citation please</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 19:14:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=211265#post211265</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=211265#post211265</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What is significant to note is that the New Zealand Attorney-General is not elected, and therefore not subject to democratic oversight by the people of New Zealand</q></p><p>I beg your pardon? That's like saying that the minister of defence is not elected. Of course our AG is elected, just like…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 18:48:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Leon Tan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=211264#post211264</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=211264#post211264</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						According to New Zealand’s Human Rights Commission, in the view of the Attorney-General, the recent Copyright (infringing file sharing) Amendment Bill passed by the New Zealand Government DOES in fact infringe on the basic human rights of New Zealanders. However, since the Attorney-General deems the objective of the legislation to…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 18:41:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>chris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=211158#post211158</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=211158#post211158</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Certainly, and granted some are able to make the ethical distinction; being against one and for the other.</p><p>Given that on almost any given Friday this channel is pitched as a hub for the dissemination of copyrighted info and in light of Russell finding comparative positives in this legislation whilst…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 02:00:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=211129#post211129</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=211129#post211129</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><i>...are you for or against the right to share files?</i></p><p>File sharing is not illegal per se. It's only illegal when the creator of the work asserts copyright and the person sharing the file doesn't have the right to do so.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:35:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>chris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=211126#post211126</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=211126#post211126</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>This isn't a great law &mdash; and the circumstances of its passing are odious &mdash; but it's considerably better than it might have been.</p></blockquote><p>I've pondered this for a while and I'm not quite clear, Russell are you for or against the right to share files?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 15:53:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210965#post210965</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210965#post210965</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If Labour and the Greens can not successfully take on this madness (let alone what Brash will add to the mix) then they richly deserve to be booted out of parliament by voters.</q></p><p>Sounds like Jones is starting to step up, and ask some intelligent questions in the House. Auckland…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:54:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210964#post210964</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210964#post210964</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>They had months to do so through other channels</q></p><p>Really? I think most people thought the Bill was being left to sleep for a while. I certainly did. And short-circuiting parts of the process removes some of those months.</p><p>Labour's been very crap at communicating, and we're all agreed on…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:49:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210929#post210929</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210929#post210929</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>they didn't have an opportunity to articulate said position</q></p><p>Parliamentary debates are hardly the best place for that. They had months to do so through other channels. Just try asking most voters what the opposition would have done differently. Then consider if that might have something to do with their…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:28:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210928#post210928</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210928#post210928</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Their way IS the highway, according to RadioNZ this morning</q></p><p>Transport Blog discusses Joyce's latest fact-free <a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2011/04/28/the-next-gps-out-of-touch-with-reality/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">tarmac-licking</a> government policy statement (or "GPS") which proposes spending even more public money on motorways like the essential Cambridge to Taupo route. Comments have useful links including RNZ interview and the GPS doc itself.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:25:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210917#post210917</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210917#post210917</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>It's possible that a clearly-articulated strategy from Labour could make a difference, but that only helps if you've got time on your side with which to articulate. Urgency changes the equation, because no matter how good your arguments the only people to whom you're preaching are the implacable foe seated…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:21:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210909#post210909</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210909#post210909</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>therefore Labour’s message should not be pitched at National, but at the people</q></p><p>See what I wrote about how Urgency changes the equation. Under ordinary circumstances, yes, totally agree. But this Bill did not pass under ordinary circumstances. Labour actually <em>did</em> speak quite effectively in the House about why termination…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:02:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210908#post210908</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210908#post210908</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Their way IS the highway, according to RadioNZ this morning.</q></p><p>Yes, and that thought did cross my mind as I was typing.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:59:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210900#post210900</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210900#post210900</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If I thought the current government gave the teensiest, tiniest shit what anyone outside (or even everyone inside!) the caucus thinks, I might be more inclined to accept this proposition.</q></p><p>I'm pretty damned sure they're concerned about what opinion polls say, and therefore Labour's message should not be pitched at…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:40:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210899#post210899</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210899#post210899</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Not convinced that that’s completely off the agenda, though. It was also 18 months ago, and the “Our way or the highway” attitude has become a lot more obvious in the intervening period.</q></p><p>Their way <strong>IS</strong> the highway, according to RadioNZ this morning.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:35:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210890#post210890</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210890#post210890</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Also: Compare with the <a href="http://norightturn.blogspot.com/2011/04/if-you-cant-plug-it-dont-drill-it.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">deep-sea oil prospecting</a> that’s just been green-lighted.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:07:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210887#post210887</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210887#post210887</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Mining national parks?</q></p><p>Not convinced that that's completely off the agenda, though. It was also 18 months ago, and the "Our way or the highway" attitude has become a lot more obvious in the intervening period.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 11:58:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210880#post210880</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210880#post210880</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But National clearly don't give a fuck for anyone's opinions unless they confirm their own biases</q></p><p>Mining national parks?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 11:13:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210878#post210878</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210878#post210878</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>You don’t seem to be able to accept that an Opposition with a clearly articulated dissenting alternative can be more of a moderating influence than meekly settling for tiny amendments.</q><br />If I thought the current government gave the teensiest, tiniest shit what anyone outside (or even everyone inside!) the caucus…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:57:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210788#post210788</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210788#post210788</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						They have achieved that. The dispute is about whether alternative courses might have achieved more. You don't seem to be able to accept that an Opposition with a clearly articulated dissenting alternative can be more of a moderating influence than meekly settling for tiny amendments. Or you don't think Labour…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 10:16:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210785#post210785</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210785#post210785</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>By taking the position that many of the posters in here apparently wish they had, and simply voted against the Bill, knowing it would pass anyway, rather than trying to moderate some of its greatest excesses.</p><p>An Opposition is meant to try and limit the government-of-the-day's power, and that's what…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:46:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210749#post210749</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210749#post210749</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It does count if you have agreed not to.</q></p><p>Good point. How could Labour possibly have avoided being forced into that position?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:34:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210746#post210746</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210746#post210746</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It does count if you have agreed not to.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:18:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210743#post210743</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210743#post210743</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And since when does voting against legislation that you don't support constitute "bad faith"?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:46:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210739#post210739</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210739#post210739</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Those are both achievements, and neither would’ve been possible had Labour previously acted in bad faith towards National over votes on legislation.</q></p><p>Both parts of that statement are assertions without a shred of evidence to back them. Perhaps they achieved nothing that National would not have done anyway, as soon…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 18:47:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Yamis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210737#post210737</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210737#post210737</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Pretty much sums up the political system and the way people vote in all western democracies.</p><p>National didn't so much win the last election as the voters got sick of Labour.  They sure as sh*t haven't brought anything new and refreshing to the table with the same old tired stable…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 11:00:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210736#post210736</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210736#post210736</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						"Labour Party strategy" basically amounts to waiting another two or three elections for the public to finally decide that it's "time for a change". Since the Labour party has maybe 30% sheeplike "tribal" voters who will never desert them, they'll then get to be the government for a few terms.…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:49:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210706#post210706</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210706#post210706</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I happen to believe that having a National government is a “sub-par outcome” per-se, and that moderating their stupidity just makes the continuance of their rule more attractive.</q></p><p>I agree with the former. The second is a pretty hard question to know yes or no, and I have no doubt…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 15:28:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210700#post210700</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210700#post210700</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Seeing as this is the nearest to a copyright thread we have at present, here's a tidbit that's just been unearthed by Jamie Love at Knowledge Ecology International: <br /><a href="http://keionline.org/node/1117" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Homeland Security's 2008 letter to USTR: ACTA is a threat to national security</a></p><p><q><br />In 2008, DHS was concerned that:<br />"some possible outcome…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 00:33:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210696#post210696</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210696#post210696</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Maybe the tide is turning? David Cunliffe lays out a clear Labour position about the cost of living on Radio NZ's <a href="http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/morningreport/20110419" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morning Report</a> show (<a href="http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/morningreport/audio/2487557/labour-says-government-doing-little-to-help-struggling-families.asx" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">5 mins streaming</a>) &ndash; h/t <a href="http://thestandard.org.nz/first-amongst-equals/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Te Standard</a>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:26:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210687#post210687</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210687#post210687</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>In the case of the Copyright Act, I think it would have been *better* had the law been passed in its original form and Big Media allowed to start laying into Pt. Chev mums with filesharing offspring. That would have at least created a reaction against further such measures including…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 00:19:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210678#post210678</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210678#post210678</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I happen to believe that having a National government is a "sub-par outcome" per-se, and that moderating their stupidity just makes the continuance of their rule more attractive.</p><p>If a change that Labour managed to get through *was* so attractive as to seriously reduce the impact of the act (for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 20:00:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210671#post210671</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210671#post210671</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Labour could table the amendments, argue for them and decide whether the final bill deserves their support.</q></p><p>Which is great if the government <em>needs</em> Labour's votes to pass the Bill. Except that, well, it doesn't. So Labour could table amendments that would end global poverty and hunger for no cost…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:30:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210665#post210665</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210665#post210665</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						You'd be thinking of Wendy Neilson of the Disabled Persons Assembly. This morning, Radio NZ featured a few stories (here's the main one, <a href="http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/morningreport/audio/2487738/government-%27should-accept-responsibility-to-disabled%27.asx" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">5 minutes streaming</a>) about the long-running case of parents of disabled people fighting the Misery of Health for the right to be paid like any other suitable…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 15:42:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210660#post210660</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210660#post210660</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>why the fuck do we have to rely on the opposition to make all the compromises to prevent our own government from screwing up their own constituents?</q></p><p>This. And surely Labour has to worry about the ambiguity it casts over its positions. </p><p>But I think it speaks to a larger…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 14:57:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210659#post210659</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210659#post210659</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Maybe rather than conspiring with National behind closed doors to pass amendments (Which ones &ndash; we aren't being told?) Labour could table the amendments, argue for them and decide whether the final bill deserves their support.</p><p>Their current actions just show that they have almost as much contempt for open…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 14:56:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Heather Gaye</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210658#post210658</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210658#post210658</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>There’s something that really gets my goat about Labour opting to pass with amendments/compromise rather than fighting a bill outright: </p><p>I just have no idea if this is just because the dialogue here trends left, but all the opinion expressed or implied here about the Christchurch bill seems to be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 14:49:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210651#post210651</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210651#post210651</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Yes, it would be worse law, but not “due to [Labour] voting against it”; due to National introducing it and garnering enough support to have it passed.</q></p><p>True. But I suspect there's a lot of people who get into parliament to make things better. And they might not be going…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 14:18:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jacqui Dunn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210602#post210602</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210602#post210602</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Yes, it would be worse law, but not “due to [Labour] voting against it”; due to National introducing it and garnering enough support to have it passed.</q></p><p>+ 1<br />I really don't understand what the problem is with calling a spade a spade. I get the feeling Labour isn't telling…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 19:16:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210596#post210596</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210596#post210596</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Not so sure about the diminished power to achieve anything, though.</q></p><p>Well, as it stands, Labour are stating that they achieved concessions in both the CERA and file-sharing bills by agreeing to vote for them. In the case of CERA we don’t know what they are, but one assumes that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:16:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210592#post210592</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210592#post210592</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>If you're suggesting that Labour should've then welched on the deal and voted against the Bill despite having agreed to vote for it in order to get their compromise, then you're advocating that Labour behave in bad faith and in a manner that would diminish Labour's ability to achieve anything…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:50:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210585#post210585</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210585#post210585</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>This would be done after having passed their own bill? I don’t think they’d want to look like such fools. Indeed, I don’t think they really want it to become bigger news, that they have used urgency for something like this. It would be the perfect example of why NOT…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:56:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210580#post210580</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210580#post210580</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Lots of black-and-white analysis in here of a very grey problem.</q></p><p>Meh, sometimes things aren't as complicated as they can be made to seem. </p><p><q>why not? It's not hard. They have the votes to do anything they want, and we don't know which sections were amendments inserted at Labour's behest.…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:04:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210579#post210579</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210579#post210579</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Which might've been a credible response to the file-sharing bill, but is actually very much not a credible response to CERA when it's full of draconian powers that will be available for use immediately because "it's an emergency".</q></p><p>Fair point.</p><p><q>Plus, in Labour's current situation it would be a hard…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:01:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210577#post210577</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210577#post210577</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If Labour had any reason to be confident in its comms ability, then they could explain why they voted against the CERA bill, tell voters positively what their preferred solution would be and campaign on that basis to become the government so they can fix any problems after November. </q></p><p>Which…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:51:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210570#post210570</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210570#post210570</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I hope they are ashamed of themselves.</q></p><p>Say what you really feel!</p><p><q>It’s possible that if Labour hadn’t voted for it, the government would have pulled the improvements and due to them voting against it would be worse law.</q></p><p>What 3410 said. It seems an unlikely scenario to me, that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:30:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210568#post210568</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210568#post210568</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If Labour is against something then they should vote against it, and when the shit hits the fan they can say "National did that, and that's why you should vote for us, not them".</q></p><p>They need to communicate well before that. You do not need to wait to do stuff.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:24:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210567#post210567</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210567#post210567</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>not "due to [Labour] voting against it"; due to National introducing it and garnering enough support to have it passed.</q></p><p>..and due to National being far better right now at political strategy and communication than Labour &ndash; despite their own manifest failures that would provide ample fodder for any half-competent…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:22:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210564#post210564</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210564#post210564</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It’s possible that if Labour hadn’t voted for it, the government would have pulled the improvements and due to them voting against it would be worse law.</q></p><p>Yes, it would be worse law, but not "due to [Labour] voting against it"; due to National introducing it and garnering enough support…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:13:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210560#post210560</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210560#post210560</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>If Labour had any reason to be confident in its comms ability, then they could explain why they voted against the CERA bill, tell voters positively what their preferred solution would be and campaign on that basis to become the government so they can fix any problems after November. </p><p>That…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:03:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210556#post210556</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210556#post210556</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If Labour is against something then they should vote against it, and when the shit hits the fan they can say “National did that, and that’s why you should vote for us, not them”.</q></p><p>Well sometimes. But the proposed legislation might be something that you’re not happy with, but which…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 13:51:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210547#post210547</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210547#post210547</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>In the MMP environment, parties can govern very effectively by negotiating in good faith with other parties</q></p><p>Yes, that's particularly true if these good faith negotiations involve their Opposition voting how they are told to by the government. Extremely effective. So effective, that any party that could swing that would…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:19:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210546#post210546</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210546#post210546</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Okay, sure, it’s possible, but in the normal state of affairs a govt. that can not pass its legislation is circling the drain</q></p><p>Yeah but nah – that’s a peculiarly FPP view of government.<br />In the MMP environment, parties can govern very effectively by __negotiating in good faith with other…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:10:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210544#post210544</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210544#post210544</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What I'm picking up, notably from Lianne Dalziel's comments on Red Alert, is that Labour's Chch MPs got some sort of concession they felt was vital for their constituents. What I'm hazy on is what the concession was, and what consequences they feared from voting against.</q></p><p>That may be so,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:50:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210543#post210543</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210543#post210543</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Besides, what does voting <em>for</em> legislation that you disagree with get you?</p><p>On the one hand, it gets you a few meagre compromises from the govt. (and they'll very quickly learn to factor such "compromises" into future legislation).</p><p>On the other hand, you've just pissed away any legitimacy in complaining…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:40:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210542#post210542</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210542#post210542</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I keep hearing this argument, but I just do not get it.</q></p><p>What I'm picking up, notably from <a href="http://blog.labour.org.nz/index.php/2011/04/17/urgency-when-is-its-use-a-constitutional-outrage-part-2/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lianne Dalziel's comments on Red Alert</a>, is that Labour's Chch MPs got some sort of concession they felt was vital for their constituents, in return for voting with the Government. What I'm…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:36:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210541#post210541</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210541#post210541</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It's possible (and has happened) for the government to fail to pass legislation without bringing about an election</q></p><p>Technically, yes. But if it's failing to pass legislation, it is usually because its coalition is falling apart or it's internally divided, even.</p><p>I take 3410s point as hinting that failing to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:33:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210540#post210540</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210540#post210540</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>uh, no. Only if the government fails to get a majority on a confidence or supply motion is that true. It's possible (and has happened) for the government to fail to pass legislation without bringing about an election.</q></p><p>Okay, sure, it's <em>possible</em>, but in the normal state of affairs a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:21:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210539#post210539</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210539#post210539</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>For starters, if ever that were not the case, the govt. would therefore no longer have the confidence of the House and would have to call an election.</q></p><p>uh, no. Only if the government fails to get a majority on a confidence or supply motion is that true. It's possible…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:07:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210537#post210537</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210537#post210537</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It would not have stopped the bill.</q></p><p>I keep hearing this argument, but I just do not get it.</p><p>For starters, if ever that were <em>not</em> the case, the govt. would therefore no longer have the confidence of the House and would have to call an election.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:58:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210535#post210535</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210535#post210535</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What Labour should do now is emphasise its Christchurch MPs' connection with the city</q></p><p>Coherent, well-crafted communication would be useful, yes</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:55:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210534#post210534</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210534#post210534</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						They were at their best keeping in touch when Mike Munro was handling communications. Once he left for a private sector job, those who replaced him didn't quite fill his shoes.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:43:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jacqui Dunn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210532#post210532</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210532#post210532</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Perhaps <strong>you</strong> should be the new adviser, Russell?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:06:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210531#post210531</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210531#post210531</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Apparently Labour’s craven behaviour over CERA and suchlike is *not* evidence that they have been following Pagani’s advice for the last 20 months while he has been Goff’s main comms advisor.</q></p><p>I think Pagani's stuff is extremely ropey, but I can also see the argument that Labour would be making…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:02:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210529#post210529</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210529#post210529</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q><br /><em>Labour is making a hash of connecting with people.</em><br /></q></p><p>It surely is that.<br />To quote an FB exchange with my brother yesterday:</p><p>Brother &ndash; <em>"I would really like the [Labour] Party to actually stand for something other than being re-elected" &ndash; Dimpost comments section.</em></p><p>Me &ndash; __ Even if that's…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 08:56:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210506#post210506</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210506#post210506</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Audrey Young is a <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10720352" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">tad confused</a>. </p><p>Apparently Labour's craven behaviour over CERA and suchlike is *not* evidence that they have been following Pagani's advice for the last 20 months while he has been Goff's main comms advisor.</p><p><q>If Pagani has been giving such advice they haven't been listening. If they had…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 15:11:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210440#post210440</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210440#post210440</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Just gets better. Pagani posts a response at his own blog titled “Does replying to trolls only encourage them?”. </q></p><p>Well, John, until a few short weeks ago (apparently) you were a senior advisor to the leader of the Opposition in our House of Representatives &mdash; and I presume you weren't…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 08:13:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210434#post210434</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210434#post210434</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Pagani also had a crack at me in his post. At the risk of linkwhoring here’s my exasperated response.</q></p><p>We do not have this “linkwhoring” concept here. I find it kind of silly. If you wrote something you think is interesting, link away.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 23:05:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210432#post210432</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210432#post210432</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Pagani's twitter feed</q></p><p>Had to agree with you that his <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/johnpagani/status/59896468441534464" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">punchline</a> was jawdrop genius:</p><p><q>If only I could silence them.</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:42:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ScottY</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210431#post210431</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210431#post210431</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>You should see Pagani's <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/johnpagani" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">twitter feed</a>. Does he realise other people can read what he's writing ?</p><p>Pagani also had a crack at me in his post. At the risk of linkwhoring <a href="http://www.imperatorfish.com/2011/04/look-at-polls.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here's</a> my exasperated response.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:37:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210430#post210430</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210430#post210430</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Just gets better. Pagani posts <a href="http://johnpagani.posterous.com/does-replying-to-trolls-only-encourage-them" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">a response</a> at his own blog titled "Does replying to trolls only encourage them?". </p><p>Danyl also posted <a href="http://dimpost.wordpress.com/2011/04/18/the-bloggers-reply-to-the-strategist/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">"The blogger’s reply to the strategist"</a> earlier, but his other thread seems better.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 20:58:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210429#post210429</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210429#post210429</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>John Pagani </q></p><p>Discussed by <a href="http://dimpost.wordpress.com/2011/04/18/this-explains-everything/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Danyl's commenters</a>. Pagani even <a href="http://dimpost.wordpress.com/2011/04/18/this-explains-everything/#comment-41415" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">joins in</a>:</p><p><q>But the hard issue for Labour is that pubic opinion iapproves of the Government’s direction. I’m not seeing your commenters engage with that , other than to assume it’s all because Labour hasn’t whacked the Government hard enough. I think…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 20:12:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210428#post210428</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210428#post210428</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Lianne Dalziel seems to have given an answer <a href="http://blog.labour.org.nz/index.php/2011/04/17/urgency-when-is-its-use-a-constitutional-outrage-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-168255" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">in passing</a>.</p><p><q>Essentially we couldn’t vote for Gareth’s amendments when we had agreed a compromise on the bill with the government.</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 19:45:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210423#post210423</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210423#post210423</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Good. Seems at least John Pagani has been given <a href="http://norightturn.blogspot.com/2011/04/whats-wrong-with-labour.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">marching orders</a> from Labour. More.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:57:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210399#post210399</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210399#post210399</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> <em>Rick Shera has just confirmed for me that Russell is right about this.</em></p><p>Nothing on TPMs in new Act but under #TPPA breaking a TPM would count as a strike even if underlying material out of #copyright</q></p><p>The US stance on TPPA would not only extinguish any fair-use rights to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 09:58:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210398#post210398</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210398#post210398</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Not the filesharing bill, no. That's in the US position on TPPA.</q></p><p>Rick Shera has just <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/lawgeeknz/status/59729795252109313" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">confirmed</a> for me that Russell is right about this.</p><p><q>Nothing on TPMs in new Act but under #TPPA breaking a TPM would count as a strike even if underlying material out of #copyright</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 09:36:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Greg Dawson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210394#post210394</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210394#post210394</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Right-wing mouthpiece Idiot/Savant... </q></p><p>Seriously I'm not sure my irony gland can handle this so early in the morning.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 08:20:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210393#post210393</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210393#post210393</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>BTW, Russell, I do agree with you that this act is quite bad enough without the Orwellian hyperbole but believe me making a “recommendation” to caucus is a very long way from a solid policy commitment. And Curran knows it.</q></p><p>Yes, I’m sure she does know that.</p><p>The party has,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 07:59:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>SHG</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210392#post210392</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210392#post210392</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Right-wing mouthpiece Idiot/Savant had this to say about Curran's "commitment":</p><p>'Forgive my suspicion, but we all know that “we’ll consider it” is soothing politician-speak for FOAD'</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 00:10:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210384#post210384</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210384#post210384</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>To be fair, Curran has already said she’d recommend a repeal bill to her caucus if the government enacts the termination provisions.</q></p><p>And I’m sure we’ll all be eagerly awaiting a clear, unambiguous statement of policy from Labour’s communications and IT spokeswoman <em>before</em> the election.  Won’t we?</p><p>BTW, Russell, I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 18:33:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210383#post210383</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210383#post210383</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Is it? The distinction between bills that have been through the select committee process (the Copyright stuff) and bills that have been rammed through without (CERRA) seems important to me.</q></p><p>You're commenting about one theme of <a href="http://blog.labour.org.nz/index.php/2011/04/17/urgency-when-is-its-use-a-constitutional-outrage-part-1/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dalziel's post</a> (second sentence quoted below). I'm talking about the other (first sentence):<br /><q>But…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 18:30:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210382#post210382</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210382#post210382</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Curran has already said she'd recommend a repeal bill to her caucus</q></p><p>I've seen that quoted in <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10719372" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">one article</a>. One. Not said anywhere on her own thread on Labour's own blog despite repeated invitation to do so. And Curran supposedly has a comms background? Pffft</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 18:23:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210381#post210381</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210381#post210381</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>but voting for it’s passage and/or adding insult to injury by getting rather coy about committing to repeal. Can’t have it both ways, sweeties.</q></p><p>To be fair, Curran has already said she'd recommend a repeal bill to her caucus if the government enacts the termination provisions.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 17:21:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210380#post210380</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210380#post210380</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Lianne Dalziel has blogged on copyright and the use of urgency, including Curran’s role.</q></p><p>FFS, nobody I’d take at all seriously is saying Labour should engage in knee-jerk opposition for the sake of it and not even David Farrar and Grant Robertson (who’ve done an excellent bipartisan attack on abuse…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 16:43:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210379#post210379</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210379#post210379</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It's just another self-obsessed defensive rant that refuses to acknowledge responsibility. </q></p><p>Is it? The distinction between bills that have been through the select committee process (the Copyright stuff) and bills that have been rammed through without (CERRA) seems important to me. I actually feel a bit misled by the news…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 16:38:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210378#post210378</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210378#post210378</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Not the filesharing bill, no. That's in the US position on TPPA.</q></p><p>Ta. Quite possible that's what I was reading about</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 15:27:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210377#post210377</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210377#post210377</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>@Sacha</p><p><q>I recall reading somewhere in the lead-up that our recently-passed law makes it illegal again to avoid regional encoding of DVDs (which like staggered release dates brings only harm for consumers). Progress?</q></p><p>Not the filesharing bill, no. That's in the US position on TPPA. I don't think there has…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 15:22:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210376#post210376</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210376#post210376</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>It's just another self-obsessed defensive rant that refuses to acknowledge responsibility. </p><p>Unless Labour gets over themselves right now, everyone else is due for another three years of being dicked over by a government that any competent opposition would be ripping to shreds. Pathetic.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 14:58:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Phil Lyth</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210375#post210375</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210375#post210375</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Lianne Dalziel has <a href="http://blog.labour.org.nz/index.php/2011/04/17/urgency-when-is-its-use-a-constitutional-outrage-part-1/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">blogged</a> on copyright and the use of urgency, including Curran's role.</p><p>Worth a read IMHO.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 14:26:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210374#post210374</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210374#post210374</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Good to know, I think. I still struggling to see who exactly the TPPA is supposed to benefit though.</q></p><p>The US, silly. No-one else gets any benefit at all.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 13:12:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210373#post210373</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210373#post210373</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Um, no? </q></p><p>Good to know, I think.  I still struggling to see who exactly the TPPA is supposed to benefit though...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 12:43:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210372#post210372</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210372#post210372</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But I can’t actually play them on my legally purchased region-free player?</q></p><p>Um, no? I don’t know which part of the law you’re thinking of but that’s not my understanding at all. As long as it’s for your personal use, you’re free to watch it, and even copy it across…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 12:05:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210371#post210371</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210371#post210371</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But I can’t actually play them on my legally purchased region-free player?</q></p><p>I believe that would count as circumventing TPMs, yes. One of our friendly local IP lawyers might want to confirm or correct that.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 12:03:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210370#post210370</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210370#post210370</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I recall reading somewhere in the lead-up that our recently-passed law makes it illegal again to avoid regional encoding of DVDs (which like staggered release dates brings only harm for consumers). Progress?</q></p><p>This is where I start getting confused.  As I understand the law, it’s perfectly legal for me to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:45:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210369#post210369</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210369#post210369</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I think that's more of a win-win for all parties</q></p><p>Quite. It's adapting business models in ways that did not require a law change &ndash; and it shows up the industry's refusal to do it more widely. </p><p>I recall reading somewhere in the lead-up that our recently-passed law makes it…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:18:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210368#post210368</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210368#post210368</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Expert discussion about the copyright legislation by TUANZ CEO Paul Brislen and the Science Media Centre’s Peter Griffin on Radio NZ this mornng – stream, 20min or MP3, 7.2MB.</q></p><p>I found it rather odd, however that (I think) Paul cited <em>Doctor Who</em> as a case study in old media fail,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:10:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210366#post210366</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210366#post210366</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And the answer can't be simply to side with the intermediary whose business model is more current, surely.</p><p>To put it another way: the problem of the coming decade will be how to curb the power of Google, Apple and Facebook, not how to increase it. It increases by itself…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:03:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210355#post210355</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210355#post210355</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Expert discussion about the copyright legislation by TUANZ CEO Paul Brislen and the Science Media Centre's Peter Griffin on Radio NZ this mornng &ndash; <a href="http://www.radionz.co.nz/audio/national/twu/2011/04/16/tech_new_copyright_law" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">stream, 20min</a> or <a href="http://podcast.radionz.co.nz/twu/twu-20110416-1215-Tech_new_copyright_law-048.mp3" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">MP3, 7.2MB</a>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 21:07:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210351#post210351</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210351#post210351</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Serious question I haven't seen an answer to: was there an agreement between Labour and National not to vote for any supplementaries like Hughes's as part of securing suspension of the termination provision?</p><p></q></p><p>No-one has admitted that, that I know of, but it's the only thing that would explain both…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 18:45:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210350#post210350</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210350#post210350</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>. Despite the world moving substantially over the past 20 years to adopt green ideas, the Greens aren’t gaining substantial support</q></p><p>This month in Germany <a href="http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,14969895,00.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the Greens have overtaken the SPD</a> to become the largest opposition party.  My understanding is that the nuclear disaster in Japan had a lot to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 18:29:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210342#post210342</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210342#post210342</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Loved your Humans post, Gio #kiaora</q></p><p>Thank you Sacha.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:59:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210341#post210341</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210341#post210341</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Labour's lack of spine over CERA <a href="http://thestandard.org.nz/im-sorry-im-out/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">has cost</a> The Standard one of its authors (h/t Danyl).</p><p><q>Labour should have said: ‘we want special legislation and a commission for Christchurch but this law is a naked power grab beyond any justification. We have been lied to repeatedly through out this process,…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:56:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210340#post210340</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210340#post210340</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Loved your Humans post, Gio #kiaora
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:52:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210338#post210338</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210338#post210338</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I see it completely the other way round. The *worse* the law, the more it would discredit the corporate protection/free trade agenda. It would be quite likely that those being fined and having their Internet cut off would be Karori mums with offspring who downloaded a few torrents and left…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:51:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210337#post210337</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210337#post210337</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>No, but at least their business models are from this century</q></p><p>Yeah, see, this bugs me a little. The question in the area of copyright is how to look after the makers of content and the public, which in a capitalist system will likely mean some sort of commercial intermediary…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:47:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210336#post210336</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210336#post210336</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Google is the Friend of the People</q></p><p>No, but at least their business models are from this century.</p><p><q>pervy</q></p><p>I hadn't thought about it like that, but you're right :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:41:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210335#post210335</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210335#post210335</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The Farmer case would not and could not, I think, have been pursued by a public defender</q></p><p>It's what happens when you get laws made by people who know the cost of everything and the value of nothing. </p><p>Next, cost-benefit assessments determining police pursuits as in George Lucas's first movie…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:40:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210334#post210334</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210334#post210334</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Yes, because Google is the Friend of the People, eh?</q></p><p>It's more that Google will give stuff away in return for being allowed to watch you use it. Which you may or may not find pervy.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:38:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210332#post210332</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210332#post210332</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Of course the ultimate solution might be for tech companies like Google simply to buy out the entire recorded music industry who are driving reactonary law like the one our parliamant has just passed at their behest.</q></p><p>Yes, because Google is the Friend of the People, eh?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:35:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210331#post210331</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210331#post210331</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Of course the ultimate solution might be for tech companies like Google simply to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110415/02580813908/why-google-should-buy-recording-industry.shtml" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">buy out</a> the entire recorded music industry who are driving reactionary law like the one our parliament has just passed at their behest.</p><p><q>Rumours about Google's music service have been swirling for a while now, but…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:31:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210329#post210329</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210329#post210329</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>As Russell noted, there are other issues right now to die in a ditch over.</q></p><p>I actually got a bit annoyed with Twitter exploding with people who'd found their issue, at the same time as the legal aid changes will impact very vulnerable people. The <a href="http://tvnz.co.nz/national-news/mother-says-son-s-ordeal-could-happen-anyone-4123196" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Farmer case</a> would not and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:21:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210327#post210327</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210327#post210327</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The fact is that any changes made to this bill are symbolic. It’s largely ineffective anyway, as previously discussed. Labour would have done better to propose amendments and vote against the bill when they weren’t adopted.</q></p><p>And then, it appears, termination would have been available to the copyright tribunal as…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:14:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210326#post210326</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210326#post210326</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>at about 7 minutes into Jacinda Ardern's speech</q></p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCyszmeqK3c" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCyszmeqK3c</a></p><p>That was admirably clear about the politics, and she's one of the few who impressed me. </p><p>However, Ardern still minimised the 'guilt on accusation' aspects (note the use of "infringers" rather than "accused"). She also had an overwhelming focus on the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:09:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210321#post210321</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210321#post210321</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Labour's attitude to this bill illustrates what's wrong with their attitude to being in opposition. They almost appear to consider that National are pretty much on the right track, and if they can persuade them to make a few tweaks, they'll enact good policy.</p><p>The fact is that any changes…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:19:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210320#post210320</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210320#post210320</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Why should academic qualifications correlate with a rational attitude to public policy? <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Teller" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Edward Teller</a>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:07:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210318#post210318</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210318#post210318</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>You’re getting the wrong end of the stick. The point I was trying to make is that there are cameras that will pick out who is at the wheel, regardless of who owns the car.</q></p><p>Not really Grant. The bill is sent to the car owner. If you can prove…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 14:51:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210311#post210311</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210311#post210311</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The apologism sounds more like cold feet to me, since a lot of them would likely have personally supported the Hughes amendment if it was put to a conscience vote.</p><p>And as Liam Dann wrote in his article, it's a clash between the 'property rights' old economy and the 'weightless'…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 13:52:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jacqui Dunn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210309#post210309</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210309#post210309</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Labour’s choice was the compromise to have the current Act, or to have the Act with account revocation in immediate effect rather than pending an Order-in-Council.</q></p><p>Thanks for pointing it out &ndash; it's something I should have known, but didn't. <br />I don't watch Parliament &ndash; you probably guessed that -…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 13:20:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210308#post210308</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210308#post210308</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Apologists for them are saying it was the best deal under the circumstances, because if they hadn’t worked with the Nats it would have been termination for anyone caught. It doesn’t ring true.</q></p><p>You may not like it, or believe it, but that's what Labour said __in the House **on…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 13:01:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jacqui Dunn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210307#post210307</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210307#post210307</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						To clarify &ndash; using this description is more for the party as a whole. I've been a Labour voter all my life, apart from a very early foray into Social Credit. Everything lately has made me feel scared for the country, and I'd feel a hell of a lot better…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 12:55:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210305#post210305</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210305#post210305</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>A sell-out. Clare Curran can spin it how she likes, but it doesn’t work for me. Apologists for them are saying it was the best deal under the circumstances, because if they hadn’t worked with the Nats it would have been termination for anyone caught. It doesn’t ring true. Yellow-bellied,…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 12:45:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Dismal Soyanz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210304#post210304</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210304#post210304</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hilarious. There is hope for journalism in this country yet.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 12:32:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jacqui Dunn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210294#post210294</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210294#post210294</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>    Has Labour said why they didn't support his amendment?</p><p>Check their own blog and tell us what you think they're saying. I'm unclear beyond some general mumble about compromise.</q></p><p>A sell-out. Clare Curran can spin it how she likes, but it doesn't work for me. Apologists for them are saying…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 11:33:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210292#post210292</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210292#post210292</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Absolute comedy gold from <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&amp;objectid=10719619" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Liam Dann</a> in Granny this morning:<br /><q><br />Shanks backed up her case by saying she was pretty savvy on computers. That's like saying that because you are savvy at existing within the dimensions of space/time you're qualified to wade into debates about quantum physics.<br /></q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 11:00:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>TroyHoward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210275#post210275</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210275#post210275</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						doh!............damn it....i guess you did.......i'm going bed.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 22:06:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>TroyHoward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210274#post210274</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210274#post210274</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/digital-living/4882838/government-is-totally-fucked" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/digital-living/4882838/government-is-totally-fucked</a></p><p>anyone notice the URL from stuff.co.nz</p><p>hehe  funny</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 22:05:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>glennd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210255#post210255</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210255#post210255</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Apart from anything else, that is plenty of legitimately-shared content on P2P networks, Blizzard and other game companies use the same protocols to legitimately serve their updates, etc. OTOH, the ignorant blatherings of Lee,Shanks and Young are hardly cause for confidence.<br /></q></p><p>Well if I ever saw a law that had…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 18:58:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210250#post210250</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210250#post210250</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Embarrassing</q></p><p>Oh yes. Melissa Lee <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110413/18085213885/new-zealand-politican-tweets-how-shes-violating-copyright-law-night-before-supporting-three-strikes-copyright-law.shtml" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">makes our nation famous</a> on the world stage (in tech publication terms).</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 18:10:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210246#post210246</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210246#post210246</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Me too. I don't even recall her being there when I made my oral submission. I'm sure she didn't say anything.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 17:51:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jonathan King</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210244#post210244</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210244#post210244</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>"What I don't think <strong>people</strong> understand is exshully that ... it's illegal to fileshare?"</em></p><p>Watching that Katrina Shanks video on the other thread actually makes me incredibly pissed off when I think about the <em>days</em> I spent crafting an extensive, thoughtful, nuanced argument &mdash; from the point of view of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 17:48:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210236#post210236</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210236#post210236</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The discovery that any Stuff url could be hacked by appending your choice of text was one of the pleasant diversions on Twitter during the parliamentary 'debate'.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 17:11:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210231#post210231</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210231#post210231</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Stuff article on Teh internets law, I would normally embed the URL but...<br /><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/digital-living/4882838/government-is-totally-fucked" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/digital-living/4882838/government-is-totally-fucked</a></p><p>Not much of an article but the url says it all.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 16:54:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210208#post210208</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210208#post210208</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>betrayed the principles of solidarity</q></p><p>Apparently wanting movements or organisations to be actually competent is not acting in their interests. Best never challenge the poor dears. If only some of the tunnel-vision tosspots could see how patronising that is &ndash; and really very unsupportive in a more mature sense.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:35:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rex Widerstrom</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210206#post210206</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210206#post210206</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>@Deep Red:</p><p>Ah, didn't know that about Cunliffe. I knew there had to be <em>some</em> reason I didn't skim past his utterances chortling to myself though. Thanks.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:32:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210205#post210205</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210205#post210205</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Will have a look tomorrow</q><br />It'll keep. Until about November.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:31:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rex Widerstrom</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210204#post210204</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210204#post210204</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Sadly that's still regarded as being class traitors by some</q></p><p>Good grief, castigated for debating the facts* "...rather than offering solidarity..."</p><p>It's an aspect of the "Hitchens syndrome" ((c) me, since we're swinging that way now :-P)</p><p>Cross to our side of the debate and you're an enlightened, open-minded hero.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:30:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210203#post210203</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210203#post210203</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>how do they resolve the difference in geographical and virtual location?</q></p><p>The Crimes Act sez:<br /><q>For the purpose of jurisdiction, where any act or omission forming part of any offence, or any event necessary to the completion of any offence, occurs in New Zealand, the offence shall be deemed to…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:30:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210200#post210200</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210200#post210200</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Now I'm not saying the NZ Parliament ought to be stuffed with PhDs. But do we have even one person with the sort of academic track record Leigh has? Do we have a successful business person? </q></p><p>Dave Cunliffe is a <a href="http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/MPP/MPs/MPs/c/0/0/49MP30551-Cunliffe-David.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Fulbright Scholar with a Masters from Harvard</a>. And Dave Parker…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:27:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sean Murgatroyd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210195#post210195</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210195#post210195</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Patents != copyrights.</q></p><p>Intellectual property = intellectual property. You seem to be assuming that if I use an analogy that's broken some identifiable respect that I'm using a broken analogy. Every analogy is broken, because the real world is the only thing that maps to the real world.</p><p>I'm merely…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:17:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210192#post210192</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210192#post210192</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Do we have a successful business person? </q></p><p>Anderton became general manager of an engineering firm, I believe. He's a dirty capitalist at heart.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:14:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jacqui Dunn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210190#post210190</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210190#post210190</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Check their own blog and tell us what you think they're saying.</q></p><p>Oh-oh. No time and I'm away for the evening. Will have a look tomorrow. (Ever the procrastinator!)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:13:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210188#post210188</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210188#post210188</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>it's intelligent and rarely, if ever, falls back on a cultish adherence to "party loyalty" at the expense of reason</q></p><p>Sadly that's still regarded as being <a href="http://thestandard.org.nz/helen-kelly-on-the-hobbit-dispute/#comment-319522" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">class traitors</a> by some.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:05:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Chris Waugh</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210184#post210184</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210184#post210184</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The problem for the government is that they have now taken responsibility for policing internet content and in doing so entered an impossible arms race.</q></p><p>Hmmm... The Chinese government is pretty good at that internet policing thing...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:59:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210180#post210180</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210180#post210180</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And like my point above about torrents using a VPN doesn't mean that one is evading the law &ndash; one might just care about personal privacy or have commercial secrets you don't want flying free on the net &ndash; I use them all the time to work with client's software,…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:49:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210177#post210177</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210177#post210177</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But that model certainly is being exploited by patent trolls far and wide.</q></p><p>Patents != copyrights.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:45:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210176#post210176</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210176#post210176</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Has Labour said why they didn't support his amendment?</q></p><p>Check <a href="http://blog.labour.org.nz/index.php/2011/04/14/no-new-zealander-can-be-disconnected-from-the-internet/#comments" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">their own blog</a> and tell us what you think they're saying. I'm unclear beyond some general mumble about compromise. They're drawing a fair caning about it.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:45:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Chris Waugh</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210173#post210173</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210173#post210173</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thank you, glennd and Matthew Poole, my questions have been cleared up. And that demonstrates the beauty of PAS.</p><p>So if use of a VPN is going to force an ISP to work very hard to track down the illegal downloaders (and clearly its already hard enough even without a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:39:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Martin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210168#post210168</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210168#post210168</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>but also that Parliament is behind the times with regard to the internet.</q></p><p>Heh...you should hear the Speaker on the tabling of quotes from blogs. He can barely bring himself to say the word.<br />Of course there is the youtube of him floating about wherein he promises to resign from…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:21:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rex Widerstrom</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210166#post210166</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210166#post210166</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Are there an PAS readers who would consider standing for parliament. We just have to do better than this.</q></p><p>And into which box of fruit loops would we jump, exactly?</p><p>Unless Russell's up for forming a PAS party, in which case I'm ready with my sub :-) Because there's a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:14:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>jo kerr</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210164#post210164</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210164#post210164</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The problem for the government is that they have now taken responsibility for policing internet content and in doing so entered an impossible arms race. Hoovering up the ip addresses from public torrent trackers is easy and will provide an initial gratifying deluge that proves their law is working. But…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:09:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sean Murgatroyd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210161#post210161</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210161#post210161</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Not really, no.</q></p><p>No. But that model certainly is being exploited by patent trolls far and wide.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:01:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rex Widerstrom</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210157#post210157</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210157#post210157</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the officer ... fraudulently, with intent to intimidate a suspect, lied to the suspect,</q></p><p>Hah! Takes me back to my first arrest... or was it my second? Anyway, a long time ago as shall become apparent.</p><p>Mr Plod storms into the interview room and tells me my friend is next…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 13:45:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210156#post210156</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210156#post210156</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Plagiarists can also put a (c) at the bottom of a page, and if they do so first, they win.</q></p><p>Not really, no.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 13:42:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jacqui Dunn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210154#post210154</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210154#post210154</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>including voting against Gareth Hughes’s sensible amendment to remove one of the worst features</q></p><p>I heard him on bFM about an hour ago. He's very clear, very forthright, and I believe, will some day be PM. Quite the most intelligent speaker on this subject, from Parliament, so far. But that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 13:37:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sean Murgatroyd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210153#post210153</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210153#post210153</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>We all watch infringing material on YouTube, even the copyright crusaders.</q></p><p>Oh thank god someone else has come to that conclusion! Yes.</p><p>Also:</p><p><q>Yes, if you were torrenting kiddy-porn, then the authorities would really want to know who exactly was responsible. But that's not going to be of interest to…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 13:33:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210148#post210148</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210148#post210148</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I just configured a VPN on an Amazon AWS cloud instance (basically, a virtual server running in the US or elsewhere). It works, after a fashion. About 300kbps (on a 2M circuit from here), so probably needs a few tweaks.</p><p>You can watch Youtube on it though. Amazon have a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 13:00:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210140#post210140</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210140#post210140</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>We all watch infringing material on YouTube, even the copyright crusaders.</q></p><p>Including this one:</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJe7vk-GgvQ" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJe7vk-GgvQ</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 12:39:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210139#post210139</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210139#post210139</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>fair dealing provisions</q></p><p>we all need to become journalists or teachers</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 12:37:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210138#post210138</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210138#post210138</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Jayne’s way smarter than that.</q></p><p>At the very least, he has much better taste in colleagues. </p><p><q>Can’t stop the signal.</q></p><p>Or take the Sky (content)? ;) </p><p><q>This distraction into Firefly/Serenity matters is somewhat appropriate given the means by which I first encountered the programme.</q></p><p>For me, that's actually an excellent…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 12:35:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew E</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210137#post210137</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210137#post210137</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Nah, I think Young’s the narc they dumped in the first episode.<br />Jayne's way smarter than that.</q></p><p>Yes, come to think of it, you're right.</p><p>This distraction into Firefly/Serenity matters is somewhat appropriate given the means by which I first encountered the programme.</p><p>Moving back on topic...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 12:33:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210135#post210135</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210135#post210135</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Jonathan Young = Jayne Cobb on the intelligence scale?</q></p><p>Nah, I think Young’s the narc they dumped in the first episode.</p><p>Jayne's way smarter than that.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 12:14:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210130#post210130</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210130#post210130</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Careful disclaimers on Youtube’s part shift liability to the end user, but at the end of the day I can search for any video on google, use a stream capture plugin and create a .flv on my machine of that video, should I want to do that.</p><p>I’ve done so…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:52:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew E</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210128#post210128</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210128#post210128</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>Even if they did push that through, it wouldn’t stop file-sharing</em><br /><q>Can't stop the signal.</q></p><p>#serenity</p><p>Jonathan Young = Jayne Cobb on the intelligence scale?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:48:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210124#post210124</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210124#post210124</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Even if they did push that through, it wouldn’t stop file-sharing</q></p><p>Can't stop the signal.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:44:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210116#post210116</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210116#post210116</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yes, if you were torrenting kiddy-porn, then the authorities would really want to know who exactly was responsible. But that's not going to be of interest to copyright enforcers &ndash; they're not interested in real crimes.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:28:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210113#post210113</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210113#post210113</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I agree, but my point was to do with the impossibility of the authorities identifying the actual individual culprit.</q></p><p>And so they can't lay criminal charges, but only fine the account holder/impound the account. Much like they do with vehicular offences. You do get fined if somebody else parks your…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:16:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Grant McDougall</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210112#post210112</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210112#post210112</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>However, unless there’s a surveillance camera in every home, it’ll be impossible to tell who actually clicks and d/loads stuff. Even if you live alone you could probably just say it was a friend mucking around on the computer while they were visiting.</em></p><p><q>I’d be a bit pissed off if…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:12:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210111#post210111</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210111#post210111</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Good to see Farrar injecting some form of bipartisanship</q></p><p>I consider it very, very telling that Farrar is objecting publicly to National's abuse of urgency.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:12:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sean Murgatroyd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210109#post210109</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210109#post210109</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Skype's built on P2P as well. How about utilities like Dropbox?</q></p><p>Even conversations around P2P are becoming irrelevant.</p><p>Streaming content isn't P2P, and is advanced as a method of content control.</p><p>It's one the primary method of illegal sharing of content we have. </p><p>Careful disclaimers on Youtube's part shift liability…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:09:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ben Austin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210107#post210107</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210107#post210107</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks Heather. Good to see Farrar injecting some form of bipartisanship
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:05:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210104#post210104</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210104#post210104</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						For the record I sometimes use torrents as part of business to get around NZ's crappy internet connectivity &ndash; to send a gig or two of (my!) data offshore to more than one  destination &ndash; say a client in the US and their Chinese manufacturing facility &ndash; it's faster to…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:01:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210099#post210099</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210099#post210099</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>as Oscar Wilde observed, “socialism will never work – it takes up too many evenings”</q></p><p>Brilliant &ndash; had never heard that one.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:51:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210094#post210094</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210094#post210094</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Clare Curran has been highly engaged with all this.</q></p><p>Yet I'd have to say her speeches during the session were rambling and overly engaged in the pettiness of the House. Jacinda Ardern and David Parker were far better and clearly understood what they were talking about. </p><p>I understand Labour may…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:35:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Grant Stone</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210093#post210093</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210093#post210093</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Skype's built on P2P as well. How about utilities like Dropbox?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:34:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210092#post210092</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210092#post210092</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>wonder if the end goal of certain groups is just to get P2P and similar activity banned altogether, and make it illegal for ISPs to allow such traffic.</q></p><p>That might be an <em>unconscious</em> goal, sort of an immune system response from a beast that doesn't want to change to match…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:32:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210091#post210091</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210091#post210091</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I think so. Apart from anything else, that is plenty of legitimately-shared content on P2P networks, Blizzard and other game companies use the same protocols to legitimately serve their updates, etc. OTOH, the ignorant blatherings of Lee,Shanks and Young are hardly cause for confidence.</q></p><p>Even if they did push that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:30:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210090#post210090</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210090#post210090</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Think of it instead as a piece of theatre, much like the TSA "war on travelers" in the US. They want to be seen to be doing something. Some of them may even believe their own propaganda that 70% of people will stop downloading if they get a warning notice.…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:30:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Heather Gaye</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210085#post210085</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210085#post210085</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The use of urgency is pretty disgraceful. Has any party or person proposed any sort of policy that would tighten rules on this matter?</q></p><p>Apparently so. It’s being pushed by <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10719268" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Grant Robertson and David Farrar</a>, curiously enough.</p><p><q>Melissa Lee explains herself:</q></p><p>I just had one of those “…you don’t know <em>anything</em>…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:12:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sean Murgatroyd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210084#post210084</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210084#post210084</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I also think it's likely to be ineffective.</q></p><p>Whole conversation right there.</p><p>_connection drops_</p><p>_picks up netbook and walks to nearest Starbucks_</p><p>Right there.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:05:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210083#post210083</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210083#post210083</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The implication might be that if you don’t lodge a complaint yourself, you don’t care, but I do not believe that of you.</q></p><p>No, I certainly wasn't trying to imply that. More that if you want to be certain that justice is done, don't rely on others doing something that,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:52:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Greg Dawson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210082#post210082</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210082#post210082</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Given how long it will take to actually send letters out, is there a provision that the "three months" has to be elapsed between receipt of the letters?</p><p>I mean, if they *start* sending a letter and take ages to print and mail it, so you end up getting three…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:46:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210081#post210081</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210081#post210081</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Ms Lee said last night the compilation was made of songs that were legally downloaded and paid for.</q><br />And so are all those songs on those illegal file sharing sites, they were legally paid for somewhere too.</p><p>I was thinking today about this idea that all file sharing was by…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:44:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210080#post210080</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210080#post210080</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> That’s just rude.</q></p><p>Yeah he could at least share them with you</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:38:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210077#post210077</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210077#post210077</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>However, unless there’s a surveillance camera in every home, it’ll be impossible to tell who actually clicks and d/loads stuff. Even if you live alone you could probably just say it was a friend mucking around on the computer while they were visiting.</q></p><p>I’d be a bit pissed off if…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:35:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210076#post210076</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210076#post210076</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> <em>Sometimes I idly wonder if the end goal of certain groups is just to get P2P and similar activity banned altogether,</em></p><p>That would be a wet dream for a lot of companies that have been hurt by file sharing. Can’t see it ever happening, though.</q></p><p>I think so. Apart from…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:31:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jason Kemp</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210075#post210075</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210075#post210075</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I stand corrected. Clare Curran has done well but I was talking about the bigger picture.</p><p><a href="http://blog.labour.org.nz/index.php/2011/04/14/no-new-zealander-can-be-disconnected-from-the-internet/ " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> "Rather than oppose it outright, we preferred to compromise to ensure New Zealanders are not denied access to the internet."</a></p><p>hmmm</p><p>and the <q> "111-11 vote against Gareth Hughes’ amendment to the…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:30:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210074#post210074</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210074#post210074</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Is this presumption of guilt really allowed under NZ’s constitutional law? Is the presumption of innocence and the onus of proof being placed on the prosecution embedded deeply enough in our constitution for this law to be thrown out by the courts? Is that even possible in the NZ system?</q>…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:28:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210073#post210073</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210073#post210073</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>4. The Labour party is missing in action</q></p><p>I think that's unfair. Even if you think they should have voted simply against the bill &mdash; which would have passed anyway &mdash; rather than doing the deal to require specific enactment before termination is available, Clare Curran has been highly engaged…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:27:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew C</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210072#post210072</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210072#post210072</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						__The next question for you lawyerly types is: Is this presumption of guilt really allowed under NZ’s constitutional law? Is the presumption of innocence and the onus of proof being placed on the prosecution embedded deeply enough in our constitution for this law to be thrown out by the courts?…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:27:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210071#post210071</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210071#post210071</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Sometimes I idly wonder if the end goal of certain groups is just to get P2P and similar activity banned altogether,</q></p><p>That would be a wet dream for a lot of companies that have been hurt by file sharing. Can't see it ever happening, though.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:23:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210070#post210070</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210070#post210070</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Melissa Lee explains herself:</q></p><p>That's priceless.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:17:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jason Kemp</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210069#post210069</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210069#post210069</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks Kracklite. </p><p><q>A millipede with OCD and a gatling gun couldn't shoot itself in the foot more often</q></p><p>I had a conversation with a local Labour Party committee member in Auckland who is in despair at the leadership. When grass roots members don't see leadership that is a huge problem.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:17:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ben Austin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210068#post210068</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-file-sharing-bill/?p=210068#post210068</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The use of urgency is pretty disgraceful. Has any party or person proposed any sort of policy that would tighten rules on this matter?</p><p>Noting of course that such tighter rules could themselves be easily changed</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:12:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
