<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Hard News: The Debate and Onwards</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Harris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72277#post72277</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72277#post72277</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Just spotted this in my feeds:<br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DIc8jdra0o" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DIc8jdra0o</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 07:35:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72262#post72262</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72262#post72262</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Don't worry, I'm not volunteering to make graphs either.  :)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 23:31:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Harris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72256#post72256</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72256#post72256</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I only find the links, Sacha. I leave the heavy lifting to more mathematical folks.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 23:01:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72233#post72233</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72233#post72233</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Great <a href="http://zfacts.com/p/318.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">debt graph</a>, Mark.  Wonder what the Kiwi equivalent would look like?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:03:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Harris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72230#post72230</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72230#post72230</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Meaning that Red's only guilty of exaggeration rather than making shit up out of whole cloth.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:48:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Harris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72229#post72229</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72229#post72229</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Craig:<br />Are you telling me you've <em>never</em> made shit up for rhetorical effect on PA?</p><p>Also, <a href="http://zfacts.com/p/318.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">see this</a>. Maybe only double, but remember, the buck stops at the top.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:47:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Trevor Nicholls</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72221#post72221</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72221#post72221</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3225/2916303486_c2c612f1f4.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Today's best poster</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:27:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72212#post72212</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72212#post72212</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Obama and team are remarkable strategists. They've still got a lot of money, and <a href="http://www.keatingeconomics.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">McCain has history</a> he'll not be keen to revisit in glorious technicolor. How low will it go? I wouldn't like to take bets.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 17:25:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72199#post72199</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72199#post72199</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Mark:</p><p>I find devil's advocacy deliciously stimulating of the little grey cells, but anyone who wants to assert any President of the United States had &ndash; or even could &ndash; "single-handedly treble the US national debt" needs to take that first year US politics again.  And show up to a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:41:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72197#post72197</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72197#post72197</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The only thing Reagan had going on was a very public face, a career of public performance and (sad to say) Alzheimer's.</p></blockquote><p>Not fair. Ronnie had two glorious assets beside which those you've listed count for next to zilch:<br />1. Nancy<br />2. The best hot-buttered-yak-wool quiff ever (not counting Elvis).</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:32:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Harris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72152#post72152</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72152#post72152</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>@ Craig</p><p>Yes, but don't go attributing all the "good" stuff (e.g. the fall of Communism)  to St Ronnie if you're not prepared to hear from the Devil's Advocate.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:03:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72106#post72106</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72106#post72106</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Maybe the Alzheimer's partly explains how he managed to single-handedly treble the US national debt.</p></blockquote><p>DeepRed: Could we leave the wholesale re-writing of history to dishonest poo-lines for Governor Palin?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 10:35:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72105#post72105</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72105#post72105</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The only thing Reagan had going on was a very public face, a career of public performance and (sad to say) Alzheimer's.</p></blockquote><p>Maybe the Alzheimer's partly explains how he managed to single-handedly treble the US national debt.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 10:21:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Harris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72091#post72091</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72091#post72091</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The only thing Reagan had going on was a very public face, a career of public performance  and (sad to say) Alzheimer's.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 00:00:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72083#post72083</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72083#post72083</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Granted, but I'm sticking with my gut feel that middle America will have eaten Palin up (quiet, Craig!).</p></blockquote><p>Well, John, Palin's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hee_Haw#Recurring_Skits_.26_Segments" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Hee-Haw</em></a> routine might well be playing, but I'm not seeing any evidence of it.  Anyone who thinks she's Ronald Reagan with a twat, would do well to remember that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 19:59:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Rowe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72082#post72082</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72082#post72082</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>They're now officially going evil</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7653132.stm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">yep</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 19:53:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72079#post72079</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72079#post72079</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Oh well. The Republicans seem to have decided they can't win by making any positive offering.</p><p>They're now <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/03/AR2008100303738.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">officially going evil</a>.</p><p>I actually don't think it will work beyond the Malkin/Instapundit crazies, but it's pretty telling that a month out they've got nothing else to say.</p><p>When they lose, I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 16:50:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Harris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72071#post72071</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72071#post72071</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						See previous comment ;-)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 11:40:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Rowe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72068#post72068</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72068#post72068</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Glenn Reynolds and Malkin seem happy to let their reputations go down with the party.</p></blockquote><p>A quick browse of the Beeb had this under <em>Experts Score the Debate</em> from Michelle Malkin:</p><blockquote><p>Sarah Palin is the real deal. Five weeks on the campaign trail, thrust onto the national stage, she rocked…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 09:27:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Harris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72065#post72065</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72065#post72065</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						You're assuming they still have reputations...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 00:52:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JohnAmiria</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72064#post72064</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72064#post72064</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Fact Checking The Debate</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XFHNgve97w" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XFHNgve97w</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 00:51:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72056#post72056</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72056#post72056</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Meanwhile, <a href="http://poll.pollcode.com/jc7Q_result_page_0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the comments</a> accompanying an Instapundit post-poll debate (Surprise! Palin 75-25)  are seriously deranged. Glenn Reynolds and Malkin seem happy to let their reputations go down with the party.</p><p>Via: <a href="http://instaputz.blogspot.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instaputz</a>.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 21:27:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72055#post72055</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72055#post72055</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>If Nate Silver's right then the fear that this person could one day be at the heart of power is receding pretty fast and probably not worth wasting too much more energy on.</p></blockquote><p>This <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/10/on-road-st-louis-county-missouri.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">first-hand report of the McCain ground game</a>, or lack thereof in Missouri, makes me think "landslide"…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 21:15:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bob Munro</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72051#post72051</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72051#post72051</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Exactly Paul. I don't have the reference here but a similar thing happened over the question about taking over as President. Biden took the time to acknowledge what a catastrophic event that would be before saying what he would do while Palin breezily rattled off her 'talking points'. You can…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 20:15:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72050#post72050</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72050#post72050</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/221903.php" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Latest on the Troopergate investigation the Republicans are trying to stonewall.</a></p><p>Having been given the raspberry by a judge, they're now going to the Alaska Supreme Court to try and stop the report being released next Friday, as scheduled.</p><p>That's just not going to be good.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 20:04:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72047#post72047</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72047#post72047</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Having now had a chance to see some of the debate, rather than just listen, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pC1W1_sTgFE" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this is a significant moment</a> where it becomes incredibly obvious how disconnected from the event Palin really is. Biden's personal history is significant and his commentary appears genuine, I'm sure you could take a cynical…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 18:41:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Harris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72042#post72042</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72042#post72042</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>From the <a href="http://www.adn.com/palin/story/545030.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Anchorage Daily News</a> (and AP)</p><blockquote><p>Sarah Palin questioned Republican presidential candidate John McCain's decision to abandon efforts to win Michigan, a campaign move she only learned about Friday morning when she read it in the newspapers.</p><p>In an interview with Fox News Channel Friday, the Alaska governor said…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 17:51:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72038#post72038</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72038#post72038</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Granted, but I'm sticking with my gut feel that middle America will have eaten Palin up (quiet, Craig!).</p></blockquote><p>But there's just no evidence that Palin broke through to anyone who wasn't already locked in to vote for her anyway. The poling says independents and committed voters went for Biden quite…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 17:15:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bob Munro</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72035#post72035</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72035#post72035</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						That's fair comment I think for the quote in it's isolation. But if you look through Shaw's site there is a collection of material that's pretty fascinating. There's another comment in the thread that quotes in full Palin's 'education' speech. Amongst other things you see how she set him up…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 16:48:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72033#post72033</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72033#post72033</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>VP debate in song and dance:</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxGKlrS9SxE" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxGKlrS9SxE</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 16:48:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72028#post72028</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72028#post72028</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>There doesn't seem to be any overt warmth between Sarah and her children.</p></blockquote><p>Isn't this getting just a little hairsplitty? I mean, the Palin camp may be attempting to reap political capital from parading her Downs child in the media, but half-baked analysis at this level of detail (attempting to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 16:04:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bob Munro</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72025#post72025</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72025#post72025</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yet again clinical psychologist Michael Shaw at  <a href="http://bagnewsnotes.typepad.com/bagnews/2008/10/biden---palin-1.html#comments" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Bag</a> had a perceptive take on the debate. His commentators are also sharp and with him have been developing their insights into visual language via his posts.<br />One commentator talks about the Palin baby onstage after the debate.</p><blockquote><p>Several times I've found…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 15:37:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JohnAmiria</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72007#post72007</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72007#post72007</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I avoided this thread til after I watched the VOA broadcast on Stratos tonite<blockquote>    I just want to note that she used the phrase 'back in the day' in her closing statement.</blockquote>And later she gave a 'shout out' to her brothers 3rd grade elementary class (he's the teacher, lest ye…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 01:55:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jolisa</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72004#post72004</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=72004#post72004</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Simon &ndash; genius.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 01:28:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Harris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71991#post71991</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71991#post71991</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The best satire I've seen was <a href="http://onegoodmovemedia.org/movies/0809/bm092708newrules.mov" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bill Maher &ndash; second half of this clip</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 22:12:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71988#post71988</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71988#post71988</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>A <a href="http://www.variety.com/VR1117993154.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">great Variety piece</a> on Letterman vs McCain, and Letterman v Leno. Money quote:</p><blockquote><p>... it’s as simple as the distinction between a comic (even an admirably hard-working one) and an old-fashioned broadcaster, predicated on Letterman’s ability to create his show at the desk in a manner Leno &mdash; still…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:29:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Blake Monkley</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71985#post71985</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71985#post71985</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>she's a former newscaster, and she knows how to be on camera)</p></blockquote><p>Which of course makes reporters hate her more. (One of their own, etc.)</p><p>Thanks, for the music links RB!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:35:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>simon g</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71975#post71975</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71975#post71975</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Well, I don't have much to say on this debate thing, that's all a bunch of boring old Washington insider talk. I'm just here to give a big shout out to all you PA readers at elementary school. Y'all get extra credit for reading this thread tonight! Now, gosh darn…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:57:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71974#post71974</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71974#post71974</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I thought Biden was by some stretch the best of the four candidates in the debate format. He said stuff in a way that let you know he really knew it.</p></blockquote><p>I completely agree. He's a substantive character worthy of his position on the ticket and reassuring to anyone who's…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:49:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71973#post71973</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71973#post71973</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Biden <a href="http://www.americablog.com/2008/10/cnn-poll-biden-wins-51-36.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">romped home</a> in the CNN snap poll; <a href="http://www.americablog.com/2008/10/more-on-cnns-debate-poll-not-good-for.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">more detail</a>.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.americablog.com/2008/10/reviews-are-in-biden-won.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">pundit roundup</a> favours Biden also.</p><p>In sum, Palin didn't fall on her face (I think anyone who'd looked at her form would have expected that to be the case &mdash; she's a former newscaster, and she knows how to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:46:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71972#post71972</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71972#post71972</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Agreed, Biden came across as a very smart, very upright guy. I hadn't seen much of him before, and I now want to see more.</p></blockquote><p>I thought Biden was by some stretch the best of the four candidates in the debate format. He said stuff in a way that let…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:40:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71970#post71970</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71970#post71970</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>SEE! SHE DIDN'T BALLS IT UP! is probably enough of a headline for her anyway...</p></blockquote><p>Indeed.  I believe this is an example of what someone was calling "the soft bigotry of low expectations" eight years ago.  She's can competently deliver talking points and rather cringe inducing laugh lines after three…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:33:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jolisa</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71967#post71967</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71967#post71967</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Agreed, Biden came across as a very smart, very upright guy. I hadn't seen much of him before, and I now want to see more. </p><p>And since it's beer o'clock, doesn't he have a nice smile? If the contest were decided on smile-wattage alone, I think Obama &amp; Biden would beat…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:08:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Easterbrook</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71966#post71966</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71966#post71966</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I only caught the last 10 minutes, but found Biden surprisingly likeable, thoughtful, and down to earth.</p><p>Palin just sounded horribly insincere.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:02:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Easterbrook</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71964#post71964</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71964#post71964</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I did, in fact, just laugh out loud into my beer o'clock beer.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:00:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Rowe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71963#post71963</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71963#post71963</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I almost expected him to show up, Hamlet's-dad-like, but I guess she forgot to draw the necessary pentacle on the stage...</p></blockquote><p>That's laugh out loud funny, but it is nearly beer o'clock NZ time...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:59:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jolisa</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71962#post71962</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71962#post71962</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Good call. A subliminal Reaganism to go along with the three (or was it four?) invocations of him by name. I almost expected him to show up, Hamlet's-dad-like, but I guess she forgot to draw the necessary pentacle on the stage...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:50:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Rowe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71959#post71959</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71959#post71959</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Did you also catch "Say it ain't so, Joe, there ya go again!"</p></blockquote><p>Isn't "there you go again" an attempt to rehash Reagan's "there he goes again..." from the 84 presidential debates.  (that's not from memory, just a half remembered comment elsewhere).</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:27:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jolisa</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71957#post71957</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71957#post71957</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Oh, and, oh my god, Joe Biden's response to her whole "As a mom" schtick was amazing &ndash; not just affecting, but effective.</p><p>And instead of pausing and acknowledging it, Palin just chirped on with her next prepared answer.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:20:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jolisa</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71954#post71954</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71954#post71954</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I just want to note that she used the phrase 'back in the day' in her closing statement.</p><p>Christ. :)</p></blockquote><p>Did you also catch "Say it ain't so, Joe, there ya go again!"</p><p>And she winked at the audience. Twice.</p><p>Winking during a televised job interview for VP is like...…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:16:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael Savidge</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71952#post71952</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71952#post71952</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I'm with Andrew Sullivan. Put her in front of the media with no script or prep and let's see what she's got. Can she handle, or understand, or analyse the real world as it unfolds before her?</p><p>Actually, I think we all know how that would play out.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:15:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71951#post71951</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71951#post71951</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Of what I saw, she did well enough.  Hollow statements all over the show but no obvious gaffs and that's all she needed. <br />Biden won it for me &ndash; on topic, knowledgeable etc etc even if a US politico tendency to schmaltz still remained &ndash; but I'm not sure that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:14:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71950#post71950</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71950#post71950</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>No, Paul, I'm with you too. She debated well. Mainly because she has done little but prepare for it for the last 3 weeks.</p></blockquote><p>Oh Jolisa, I was so hoping you'd tell me I was totally wrong. </p><p>I did notice the decline in confidence and fluidity on questions but she…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:12:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71948#post71948</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71948#post71948</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I just caught the last 15 minutes, but I just want to note that she used the phrase 'back in the day' in her closing statement.</p><p>Christ. :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:11:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jolisa</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71947#post71947</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71947#post71947</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>No, Paul, I'm with you too. She debated well. Mainly because she has done little but prepare for it for the last 3 weeks.</p><p>You could tell precisely which questions came as surprises, too, because her syntax fell apart and she muffed her answers (the questions about Dick Cheney, and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:04:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71943#post71943</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71943#post71943</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						My judgment on the debate appears at odds with the first page or so of CNN commenters as recorded <a href="http://inthefield.blogs.cnn.com/2008/10/03/first-reaction-to-biden-palin-debate/#comments" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:46:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71937#post71937</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71937#post71937</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Jesus, anyone listening to the debate; she's doing far better than I'd expected so either I fell for the GOPs strategy or she's a fantastic student.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:02:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael Savidge</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71933#post71933</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71933#post71933</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Ta much Uncle Bob!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:46:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Harris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71932#post71932</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71932#post71932</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Just in from the <a href="http://www.adn.com/palin/story/543892.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Anchorage Daily News</a></p><blockquote><p>Judge refuses to halt Troopergate probe<br />Published: October 2nd, 2008 05:26 PM</p><p>An Anchorage judge today refused to halt the Legislature's investigation of Gov. Sarah Palin and denied the state attorney general's attempt to throw out legislative subpoenas.</p><p>Superior Court Judge Peter Michalski…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:43:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bob Munro</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71925#post71925</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71925#post71925</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I have yet to master the dark art of link embedding so can one of you maestros do me a solid?</p></blockquote><p>This is the method I use. I’m sure there are slicker ways.</p><p>1. From the column to the left of the ‘Post a reply’ window copy and paste the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:09:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JohnAmiria</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71898#post71898</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71898#post71898</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						d'oh &mdash; check out my Daily Show link at the bottom of Page 9!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 12:36:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JohnAmiria</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71897#post71897</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71897#post71897</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>thanks 3410, I'll tune in <br />(saw it on sky last week at mum's)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 12:34:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JohnAmiria</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71896#post71896</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71896#post71896</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>John: What exactly is "covert" about standing for elections to school boards, running campaigns on issues, and actually bloody organising to get ballot initiatives passed? Sorry for quoting The West Wing, but in a democracy decisions get made by the people who bother to show up.</blockquote>I'm referring to the strategy…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 12:33:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71893#post71893</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71893#post71893</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>For Aucklanders without pay TV:</p><p><strong>Palin / Biden is on Triangle, 10 pm tonight.</strong><br />(I confirmed with the station this time).</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 12:28:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael Savidge</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71837#post71837</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71837#post71837</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I have yet to master the dark art of link embedding so can one of you maestros do me a solid?</p><p><a href="http://punditkitchen.com/2008/10/02/political-pictures-sarah-palin-palindrome-forward-backward/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://punditkitchen.com/2008/10/02/political-pictures-sarah-palin-palindrome-forward-backward/</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:02:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71836#post71836</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71836#post71836</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Paul &ndash; private equity at least has the edge that they are invested in actual businesses.  Unfortunately they tend to have loaded them with so much debt that as:<br />a. that debt funding becomes more expensive <br />b. economic growth prospects for that business dry up<br />the model becomes untenable.  Ability…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 09:48:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71828#post71828</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71828#post71828</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Not wishing to change the topic, however I'm interested to know the impact of this situation on private equity firms. For a while, in Australia at least, they were the obsession of the media (particularly following a <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/content/2007/s1932566.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">attempt to buy Qantas</a> that failed but cost Qantas's Chair her job). I'd…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 03:16:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71826#post71826</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71826#post71826</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And there are actually legitimate concerns, that are no less legitimate because the born-again fiscal conservatives raising them aren't exactly free of electoral self-interest.</p></blockquote><p>I think you're right to say that there are legitimate concerns about the bill, but you might agree they are not being articulated by the people…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:42:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71823#post71823</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71823#post71823</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						"banjo-free hick-hop" &ndash; classic  :)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 23:16:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71821#post71821</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71821#post71821</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>A PAC called Human Rights Campaign went up to Wasilla to ask the town's gay folk (the ones who weren't too scared to appear on camera) about Sarah Palin. It's just under six minutes long:</p></blockquote><p>Oh, Jesus, Mary and Joseph... couldn't someone at the HRC find some banjo-free hick-hop music?…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 22:26:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71820#post71820</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71820#post71820</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Yes, but that's all just code for Neo-cons/Religious Right. Because they know they can't win by overt means they try to win by stealth.</p></blockquote><p>John:  What exactly is "covert" about standing for elections to school boards, running campaigns on issues, and actually bloody organising to get ballot initiatives passed?  Sorry…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 22:17:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71811#post71811</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71811#post71811</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I know all you guys think that only the  U.S and A are having that little foible of democracy called an election but I would  just like to remind you of the fact that we have a similar thing happening here, although with less entertainment factor, on the 8th of…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 20:59:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71794#post71794</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71794#post71794</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>This is interesting.</p><p>A PAC called Human Rights Campaign went up to Wasilla to ask the town's gay folk (the ones who weren't too scared to appear on camera) about Sarah Palin. It's just under six minutes long:</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfL2l1dk8nA" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfL2l1dk8nA</a></p><p>It appears that one of the books she wanted to ban…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 18:19:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JohnAmiria</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71789#post71789</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71789#post71789</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>to new federalists this means that the federal government gives grants to different states to do with as they will, so they're more powerful and separatist.</blockquote>Yes, but that's all just code for Neo-cons/Religious Right. Because they know they can't win by overt means they try to win by stealth. 'Intelligent…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:22:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71786#post71786</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71786#post71786</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The mighty Wikipedia notes that there is this newish conception of 'federalism' in the US, and to new federalists this means that the federal government gives grants to different states to do with as they will, so they're more powerful and separatist.</p></blockquote><p>Similar confusion is occuring in Australia too -…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:03:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael Savidge</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71784#post71784</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71784#post71784</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I meant,</p><p>Not even those who etc...?</p><p>She didn't have to accept the nomination after all.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:52:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael Savidge</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71781#post71781</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71781#post71781</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>No person deserves to be held up to this sort of ridicule.</p></blockquote><p>Even those who believe they have the ability and right to rule over the masses?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:50:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71780#post71780</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71780#post71780</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hang on a minute mates. The mighty Wikipedia <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federalism_in_the_United_States" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">notes</a> that there is this newish conception of 'federalism' in the US, and to new federalists this means that the federal government gives grants to different states to do with as they will, so they're more powerful and separatist. Or something. Up…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:48:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andrew llewellyn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71779#post71779</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71779#post71779</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						This tendency to malaprop (?) worked for Dubya.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:40:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71778#post71778</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71778#post71778</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p><em>I'm, in that sense, a federalist, where I believe that states should have more say in the laws of their lands and individual areas.</em></p><p>Isn't that the EXACT OPPOSITE of federalism?</p></blockquote><p>Well er, yup. One presumes she means 'state-ist'.</p><p>I mean really, if you're running for VP, how important can…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:38:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Cormack</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71775#post71775</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71775#post71775</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I gotta say, I'm starting to feel really sorry for Sarah Palin, she is obviously so far out of her depth and it now just appears bloody mean spirited of the McCain campaign for having picked her.</p><p>No person deserves to be held up to this sort of ridicule.</p><p>The…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:27:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andrew llewellyn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71769#post71769</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71769#post71769</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Oh, I see; your question 3.</p></blockquote><p>That I didn't actually number... :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:54:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71768#post71768</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71768#post71768</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Well why not, if it turns out that change poses a threat to us</p></blockquote><p>Hmm. Perhaps you're right. I'll think on that.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:54:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71767#post71767</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71767#post71767</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Oh, I see; your question 3.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:52:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71766#post71766</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71766#post71766</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Question 3?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:50:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71764#post71764</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71764#post71764</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>CBS has the 'Supreme Court' question to both candidates up on their site now and it does Look like Palin couldn't name anything but Roe v. Wade.</p><p><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/10/01/eveningnews/main4493062.shtml" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/10/01/eveningnews/main4493062.shtml</a></p></blockquote><p>The thing about Palin is that, despite having some principled and predictable positions, her range is so narrow. She'd struggle to fill…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:42:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andrew llewellyn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71762#post71762</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71762#post71762</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>So Palin supports efforts to counteract the Earth's natural climate changes?</p></blockquote><p>Well why not, if it turns out that change poses a threat to us. I've long thouight that the only relevant questions about climate change are:</p><p>Is it happening?<br />Is it bad?<br />Can we do anything about it?</p><p>Apportioning…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:38:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71759#post71759</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71759#post71759</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>oh and this!</p></blockquote><p>Here's one that slipped by yesterday:</p><blockquote><p>Couric: Is [climate change] man-made, in your opinion?</p><p>Palin: You know there are &ndash; there are man's activities that can be contributed to the issues that we're dealing with now, these impacts. I'm not going to solely blame all of man's…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:34:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71738#post71738</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71738#post71738</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>oh and this! <br /><em>I'm, in that sense, a <strong>federalist</strong>, where I believe that states should have more say in the laws of their lands and individual areas.</em></p><p>Isn't that the EXACT OPPOSITE of federalism?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 14:29:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71737#post71737</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71737#post71737</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>useful flow-chart</p></blockquote><p>Everything I need to know about the American lawmaking process is handily on YouTube, in song form, via the wonderful Schoolhouse Rock:</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEJL2Uuv-oQ" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEJL2Uuv-oQ</a> </p><p>Palin, c'mon. Brown v. Board of Education? Plessy v. Ferguson? Bueller v. Principal Ed Rooney? (OK, I made that one up.)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 14:28:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bob Munro</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71735#post71735</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71735#post71735</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Correction. She couldn't name any other ruling she 'disagreed ' with... but then got rather confused.</p><blockquote><p>In response to a question, Ms. Palin also said that she believed there is an inherent right of privacy in the Constitution. She did not explain how she could believe in a right of…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 14:23:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71734#post71734</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71734#post71734</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>a flaming Maoist</p></blockquote><p>Now THAT sounds like a delicious cocktail...</p><blockquote><p>Palin couldn't name anything but Roe v. Wade.</p></blockquote><p>__Asked what other Supreme Court decisions she disagreed with, Alaska's governor couldn't name any.</p><p>"Well, let's see. There's, of course, in the great history of America rulings there have been rulings, that's…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 14:20:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bob Munro</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71731#post71731</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71731#post71731</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>CBS has the 'Supreme Court' question to both candidates up on their site now and it does Look like Palin couldn't name anything but Roe v. Wade.</p><p><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/10/01/eveningnews/main4493062.shtml" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/10/01/eveningnews/main4493062.shtml</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 14:13:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71722#post71722</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71722#post71722</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The last time I brought this up with some Americans they told me it was a consequence of the lack of whipping in Congress. Instead of the stick (whipping) you have the carrot (stuffing the legislator's favourite thing into an unrelated bill).
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 13:36:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71719#post71719</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71719#post71719</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>There's also some stuff about funding for rural schools put in by the Republicans. Is there any other major democracy where laws get made like this?</p></blockquote><p>To an extent they all do, but I totally get your point. </p><p>Westminister systems don't generally permit anything like the level of member-sponsored, public…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 13:20:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71709#post71709</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71709#post71709</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Sullivan also pointed to a similar column by another Palin critic, Kathleen Parker:</p></blockquote><p>Bloody hell with sprinkles on...  And the simply bizarre thing is that people like Dreher and Kathleen Parker (who is a columnist on a paper that's hardly Chicago's answer to <em>The Guarniad</em>) make me look like a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:25:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71708#post71708</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71708#post71708</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The way laws are made in America is <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=B857BB4D-18FE-70B2-A87CEFC21402F5CB" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">fucking nuts</a>. This is what's going on with the bailout bill:</p><blockquote><p>With each permutation, the bill has steadily grown in size. Treasury’s initial plan was about three pages long. The House version, which failed, stretched to 110. The Senate substitute now runs…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:23:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71699#post71699</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71699#post71699</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Bloody helll... I don't expect Rod Dreher to be a must-read for many PAS readers, but I'd describe him as being on the sane, thoughtful and civil end of the "religious right". And, after expressing pretty mild and reluctant reservations about Sarah Palin this is the kind of shit he…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:06:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71688#post71688</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71688#post71688</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Bloody helll... I don't expect Rod Dreher to be a must-read for many PAS readers, but I'd describe him as being on the sane, thoughtful and civil end of the "religious right".  And, after expressing pretty mild and reluctant reservations about Sarah Palin [[http://blog.beliefnet.com/crunchycon/2008/10/critical-of-palin-bad-man-bad.htmll|this is the kind of shit he…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 11:30:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71670#post71670</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71670#post71670</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Are these the people you'd want making your financial decisions?</p></blockquote><p>I think you get what you vote for. Sadly in these instances.</p><p>And probably no better than the Wall Street types who went along with the whole crazy sub-prime mortgages in the first place. Those are the ones that have…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 09:59:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71663#post71663</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71663#post71663</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Are these the people you'd want making your financial decisions?</p></blockquote><p>WH: To be fair, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson (the former CEO of Goldman Sachs!) shouldn't have expected universal acclaim with his cries of "give me a trillion dollars, and <em>trust me</em>, or else".  You can say some kind of bailout,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 08:48:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71661#post71661</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71661#post71661</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>If you haven't seen them already, David Letterman's takes on McCain's no show (nights <a href="http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XjkCrfylq-E" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">one</a> and <a href="http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=59S8CMXXvWI" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">two</a>) are very funny.</p><p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/29/AR2008092903406.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">This</a> from yesterday's WaPo:</p><blockquote><p>The new [far left/far right] majority isn't worried about ephemeral things such as 700-point drops in the Dow. "No, I'm not," Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.) declared…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 07:46:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71660#post71660</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71660#post71660</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>and just to make the point. mccain is a senator. Passing the law did require votes from the senate as well as congress. so him being there was doing his job</p></blockquote><p>Sage: I guess we should be thankful there's one bill we can be reasonably confident McCain is actually going…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 07:43:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Harris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71659#post71659</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71659#post71659</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>@sage<br />Actually it didn't. The Senate has yet to vote. McCain was grandstanding inthe House process.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 07:21:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>sagenz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71658#post71658</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71658#post71658</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>actually craig what got me on the original comparison was mccains <em>we</em>  against obama's you.</p><p>and just to make the point.  mccain is a senator.  Passing the law did require votes from the senate as well as congress.  so him being  there was <em>doing his job</em></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 07:08:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71654#post71654</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71654#post71654</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And, Sage, here's another leadership quality: Knowing when to step off and let other people do <em>their</em> jobs.  If the management style of a McCain Administration is going to be micro-managerial control freakery, between outbursts of impulsive "Hail Mary" decision-making, then, Houston, we've got a damn big problem.</p><blockquote><p>There is…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 01:40:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71653#post71653</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71653#post71653</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The point I was making is that mccain is spending his personal political capital on leading</p></blockquote><p>... and he should have invested it in AIG stock, for all the good it did.  Sorry to sound like a broken record here, but __over two thirds of House Republicans voted against the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 01:36:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>sagenz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71650#post71650</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71650#post71650</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Stephen &ndash; <blockquote>You ought to be disapproving his attempts to interfere in the end of the business cycle.</blockquote>  I admit there is a big part of me thinking the market should rule.  From the people calling their politicians to complain getting the result they seem to want to the bankers…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:57:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JohnAmiria</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71644#post71644</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71644#post71644</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Can't we send someone over to the US to help them out? Show them how we 'fixed' the BNZ, and then sold it for a 'profit'?</p><p><a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;_udi=B6WD4-4JCBNDT-1&amp;_user=10&amp;_rdoc=1&amp;_fmt=&amp;_orig=search&amp;_sort=d&amp;view=c&amp;_version=1&amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;_userid=10&amp;md5=92052e6f2f11dc54a2736ce990f70edb" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this</a> paper was written in 2004, revised in 2005, and online in 2006:</p><blockquote><p>This situation is exemplified through two case studies documenting an extraordinary recurrence…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 22:53:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>sagenz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71643#post71643</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71643#post71643</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>McCain is denying he blamed the Democrats for the bailout failure<br />When asked whether he blamed Dems and Obama for the bailout collapse yesterday, McCain said "no." </p><p>But yesterday McCain said: "Senator Obama and his allies in Congress infused unnecessary partisanship into the process."</p></blockquote><p>That is a slightly different statement…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 22:41:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>sagenz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71642#post71642</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71642#post71642</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>john &ndash; $100k &ndash; I meant relative small time compared to the problems the banks have.  but fair point, loose wording<br />don &ndash; raising the $100 FDIC limit to $250k is almost an irrelevance imho.  it seems to be suggested that will make the difference to bank solvency.  It might…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 22:33:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71603#post71603</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71603#post71603</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>In other news, Governor Sarah Plain sits for a <a href="http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/blog/g/0c03d39e-df44-41fc-af7d-f2f9a7f56b68" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">free, frank and substantive interview</a>!</p><blockquote><p>HH: Governor, let’s close with some foreign affairs. It is reported that you had an Israeli flag in your governor’s office. You wore an Israeli flag pin occasionally. One, is that true? And two, why your…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:22:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71599#post71599</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71599#post71599</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						By the way, even sagenz was claiming the $250k scheme was Obamas. Sage, is it a better idea now? Just asking.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:24:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71598#post71598</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71598#post71598</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I called McCain a liar for claiming Obama's insurance plan. <a href="http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/blog/g/0c03d39e-df44-41fc-af7d-f2f9a7f56b68" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Here Palin</a> repeats the lie:</p><blockquote><p>John McCain’s got some great ideas on granting authority, for instance, to the FDIC, making sure that our deposits are insured. He wants to increase that deposit insurance cap of all of our money, our…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:24:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71597#post71597</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71597#post71597</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Couric asks her what magazines and newspapers have helped shape her worldview. Palin flails around and it eventually becomes evident that she can't name a single magazine or newspaper she has read:</p></blockquote><p>Oh, come on Russell that's a harsh too far.  I'm sure she could name any number of magazines…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:14:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71596#post71596</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71596#post71596</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p><em>she can't name a single magazine or newspaper she has read:</em></p><p>That's because she has read 'all of them'.</p></blockquote><p>"Porn shocker: Palin gets foreign policy advice from Hustler Magazine"</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:10:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bob Munro</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71595#post71595</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71595#post71595</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>she can't name a single magazine or newspaper she has read:</p></blockquote><p>That's because she has read 'all of them'.</p><p>(see page 6 this thread.)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:05:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71593#post71593</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71593#post71593</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Oops, in my enthusiasm to re-read the speech and have my prejudices about McCain confirmed, it appears I wasn't reading the intro closely enough... thanks for point this out Tim.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 14:45:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tim Hannah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71592#post71592</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71592#post71592</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Slate has a remixed transcript of the Presidential debate that's worth reading. Using independent sources to verify the facts cited by each candidate, they've republished the entire debate noting where the claims are not supported &ndash; you simply hover over the redactions to see what was originally claimed. Lots of…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 14:39:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71591#post71591</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71591#post71591</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>New Palin!</p><p>Couric asks her what magazines and newspapers have helped shape her worldview. Palin flails around and it eventually becomes evident that <em>she can't name a single magazine or newspaper she has read</em>:</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRkWebP2Q0Y" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRkWebP2Q0Y</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 14:36:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JohnAmiria</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71584#post71584</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71584#post71584</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Aaargh! Me got punk'd!?</p><p> <a href="http://www.n00tz.net/2008/09/voteforthemilfcomnetorg-was-a-simple-prank/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">voteforthemilf.com</a></p><p>__Erroneous Claims</p><p>All of the sites claiming or inferring John McCain’s campaign owns the domains and registered them privately to dodge the possible scandal are making up what they think is news without actually checking the facts. The truth is it could be anyone that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:56:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71582#post71582</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71582#post71582</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Interestingly, Slate edits Obama's best lines, IMO, regarding McCain's errors on Iraq &ndash; several are redacted:</p><blockquote><p>And so John likes &mdash; John, you like to pretend like the war started in 2007. You talk about the surge. <strong>Redacted</strong>. You were wrong. <strong>Redacted</strong>. You were wrong. <strong>Redacted</strong>. And you were wrong.</p></blockquote><p>…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:53:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JohnAmiria</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71580#post71580</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71580#post71580</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I recall I asked yesterday whether his campaign could get anymore weird and erratic.</p><p>    Yes. Yes, it could.</p></blockquote><p>Yes, he's crazy alright. But we'll find out soon if he's crazy like a Fox. Just as the leaves fall in Autumn, I always get despondent around election time &ndash; wondering if democracy…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:49:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael Savidge</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71578#post71578</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71578#post71578</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Which is precisely what I was trying to explain to Peter.</p></blockquote><p>What part of "cut off state-funding to no-hoping breeders and this will stop" did you fail to grasp Russell?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:38:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71576#post71576</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71576#post71576</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>To be fair, Russell, McCain might have no idea what his own freaking campaign staff are putting in front of that "I'm John McCain and I approve this message" soundbite.</p></blockquote><p>More fool him then.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:32:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Darlington</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71575#post71575</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71575#post71575</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Which is why we just know the Biden / Palin debate is going to be a blast. She has already started with her "I remember his speeches from 2nd grade" jibes. I bet there is a whole lot more where that came from.</p></blockquote><p>Including her thoughts on the bailout:</p><blockquote><p>""But…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:32:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71573#post71573</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71573#post71573</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Slate has a remixed transcript of the Presidential debate that's worth reading. Using independent sources to verify the facts cited by each candidate, they've republished the entire debate <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2201121/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">noting where the claims are not supported</a> &ndash; you simply hover over the redactions to see what was originally claimed. Lots of…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:29:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bob Munro</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71572#post71572</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71572#post71572</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Like shooting fish in a barrel...</p><blockquote><p>Couric: And when it comes to establishing your worldview, I was curious, what newspapers and magazines did you regularly read before you were tapped for this to stay informed and to understand the world? </p><p>Palin: I've read most of them, again with a great…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:27:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71571#post71571</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71571#post71571</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>McCain is denying he blamed the Democrats for the bailout failure &mdash; while he has a campaign ad running that blames the Democrats for the bailout failure.</p></blockquote><p>To be fair, Russell, McCain might have no idea what his own freaking campaign staff are putting in front of that "I'm John…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:23:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71568#post71568</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71568#post71568</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I recall I asked yesterday whether his campaign could get anymore weird and erratic.</p><p>Yes. Yes, it could.</p></blockquote><p>Which is why we just know the Biden / Palin debate is going to be a blast. She has already started with her "I remember his speeches from 2nd grade" jibes. I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:04:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71565#post71565</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71565#post71565</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>RNZ noon has the cops praising the "It's not OK" campaign for the rise in reported violence, as not an actual increase but an increase in reporting it to the cops and not taking it anymore.</p></blockquote><p>Which is precisely what I was trying to explain to Peter.</p><p>For all that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 12:50:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Shep  Cheyenne</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71562#post71562</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71562#post71562</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>RNZ noon has the cops praising the "It's not OK" campaign for the rise in reported violence, as not an actual increase but an increase in reporting it to the cops and not taking it anymore.</p><p>Well done Russell.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 12:44:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71559#post71559</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71559#post71559</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>This is fun:</p><p>McCain is <a href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/09/mccain_denies_blaming_obama_an.php" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">denying he blamed the Democrats for the bailout failure</a> &mdash; while he has a campaign ad running that <em>blames the Democrats for the bailout failure</em>.</p><p>I recall I asked yesterday whether his campaign could get anymore weird and erratic.</p><p>Yes. Yes, it could.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 12:34:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JohnAmiria</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71558#post71558</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71558#post71558</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>you call this leadership?</p><p>    __The Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama urged Congress to get back to work today and renegotiate a massive Wall Street bailout package.</p><p>    The White House hopeful also suggested raising the limit on bank deposits guaranteed by the Federal Government to $250,000 from its current level of…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 12:29:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71550#post71550</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71550#post71550</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>you call this leadership?</p></blockquote><p>Yes. Apparently it will deliver the 12 votes that went AWOL yesterday. Of course, McCain is now claiming it was his idea. Liar.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 11:36:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71530#post71530</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71530#post71530</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Anyway, if you were really a Mises-worshipping Austrian, like Horwitz, you wouldn't be applauding McCain's ostensible efforts to get a bailout package together. You ought to be disapproving his attempts to interfere in the end of the business cycle.</p></blockquote><p>And while I really had to wearily chuckle at the House…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:51:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71521#post71521</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71521#post71521</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Oh and for those of you who think the sub prime crisis was caused by greedy bankers, think again.</p></blockquote><p>Nonsense on stilts, sage.</p><p>Nobody forced AIG to write risky insurance.</p><p>Nobody forced investment banks to buy derivatives of loans they did not write.</p><p>Nobody forced ratings agencies to overlook the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:19:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71515#post71515</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71515#post71515</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And for McCain's sake, let's just hope that vulnerable Republican Senators (Mitch McConnell, John Sununu, Elizabeth Dole, Gordon Smith and John Cornyn are all in that column) don't decide it's in their electoral self-interest to show some, shall we say, "maverick" tendencies of their own.  If the guy can't even…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 08:08:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71514#post71514</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71514#post71514</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It is an interesting comment on the respective character of each candidate that McCain goes and gets involved in a crisis whilst Obama stands back and offers platitudes</p></blockquote><p>What colour is the sky on Planet Sage? McCain's actual actions since he announced he was "suspending" his campaign are [[http://www.blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/09/29/the-bailout-bill-fails-should-we-blame-mccain.aspx|fairly well…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 07:52:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71513#post71513</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71513#post71513</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It is an interesting comment on the respective character of each candidate that McCain goes and gets involved in a crisis whilst Obama stands back and offers platitudes</p></blockquote><p>Sage:  And letting the reality back in the room, Sage, you did notice the House Republicans rejected the bailout legislation by a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 06:52:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merrica</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71512#post71512</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71512#post71512</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>wow.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2008/09/30/palin_pity/index.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2008/09/30/palin_pity/index.html</a></p><p>pretty forthright</p><p>Apologies if anyone else has already linked to this</p><p>Thursdays debate should be interesting</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 03:50:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>sagenz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71511#post71511</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71511#post71511</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>you call <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article4853244.ece" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this</a>   leadership?</p><blockquote><p>The Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama urged Congress to get back to work today and renegotiate a massive Wall Street bailout package. </p><p>The White House hopeful also suggested raising the limit on bank deposits guaranteed by the Federal Government to $250,000 from its current level of $100,000,…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 02:39:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71508#post71508</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71508#post71508</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Sorry, what do people object to exactly?</p></blockquote><p>I think both are rude, I think the actions of politicians are 'meh', TV3 is the real disappointment.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:53:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>sagenz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71506#post71506</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71506#post71506</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Oh and for those of you who think the sub prime crisis was caused by greedy bankers, <a href="http://myslu.stlawu.edu/~shorwitz/open_letter.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">think again.</a></p><blockquote><p>In the early 1990s, Congress eased Fannie and Freddie's lending requirements (to 1/4th the capital required by regular commercial banks) so as to increase their ability to lend to poor areas.…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:28:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71496#post71496</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71496#post71496</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Clark and Key's behaviour, not the best, but not totally surprising. TV3's decision to not run a debate with everyone else &ndash; some of whom could be very significant post-election, just sad.</p></blockquote><p>Sorry, what do people object to exactly? The two leaders agreeing the need a head to head or…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:46:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>sagenz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71493#post71493</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71493#post71493</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>an interesting analysis to put the bailout in perspective is an estimate that US housing losses amount to $6 trillion in the last 3 years.<a href="http://news.goldseek.com/GoldSeek/1220622331.php" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p><blockquote><p>For additional perspective on the value of $6 trillion, the Chinese economy reached a GDP of $3.4 trillion in 2007, according to the Chinese news…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:35:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>sagenz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71492#post71492</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71492#post71492</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>shiller slightly more credible and realistic in his <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/26/AR2008092602838.html?hpid=opinionsbox1" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">assessments.</a> And as the author of Irrational Exuberance he does have some.</p><blockquote><p>If we move smartly, Americans can have a better, more robust financial democracy along the lines of the system envisioned by our first president. The current crisis does not…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:27:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tony Kennedy</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71487#post71487</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71487#post71487</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Orlov on the bail out <a href="http://cluborlov.blogspot.com/2008/09/adieu-stage-1-collapse.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">plan</a></p><p>Interesting times</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 22:51:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>stephen walker</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71483#post71483</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71483#post71483</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>@Tony,</p><p>yes. Orlov is a very smart character with some very interesting insights.</p><p>have to read that book. have to. must read. top of the book list.<br />starting to sound repetative...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 22:34:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tony Kennedy</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71477#post71477</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71477#post71477</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I came across this <a href="http://www.realitysandwich.com/reinventing_collapse" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">article</a> recently and thought it would be of interest to PA readers (with some time on their hands)</p><p>It's an excerpt from the book Reinventing Collapse<br />Soviet Example and American Prospects  <br />By Dmitry Orlov  </p><p>Another one to add to the Holiday reading list</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 22:06:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71435#post71435</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71435#post71435</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And call me an old crank, but I'd rather not see Three outsourcing editorial decisions to the Ninth Floor or the Opposition Leader's office. They're perfectly entitled to decline to appear, but it's rather spineless and disingenuous of Three to pull the plug on the whole exercise.</p></blockquote><p>Yeah, that's what…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:37:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71398#post71398</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71398#post71398</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>This would be funny, if not so damned serious. Wouldn't it?</p></blockquote><p>Barney Frank is the chairman of the House Banking Committee, so at the moment he damn well better be the grown-up in whatever room he's in.  I'm no fan of Nancy Pelosi, but if she's got duvh powerful hoodoo…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:53:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71396#post71396</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71396#post71396</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I think debates with all leaders are important, but not instead of a head to head with Clark and Key.</p></blockquote><p>I don't think it's an zero sum proposition either, but the "one of us is going to be Prime Minister so we aren't going to be seen with these minnows"…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:43:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71392#post71392</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71392#post71392</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>This would be funny, if not so damned serious. Wouldn't it?</p></blockquote><p>I'm glad one of them said it.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:13:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71390#post71390</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71390#post71390</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Heh, Democrat congressman, Barney Frank, offers to talk "uncharacteristically nicely" to his Rep colleagues so that they can put country before their hurt feelings.</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLPki41U-lE" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLPki41U-lE</a></p><p>This would be funny, if not so damned serious. Wouldn't it?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:05:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71389#post71389</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71389#post71389</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Paul: Love you, love your work, but that's nonsense &mdash; and being a Labour supporter has nothing to do with it, Much as I'd like it to be otherwise, I'm not see either National or Labour being in a position to govern alone. They're going to need one or more…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:54:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andrew llewellyn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71388#post71388</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71388#post71388</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Always fun to see the world through Kerr-tinted glasses for a moment</p></blockquote><p>He needs to take those off &amp; address himself in the mirror before he goes jogging. OT, but the other evening I would have sworn santa (or a giant red panda) was jogging (in a shuffling kind of way)…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:47:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71385#post71385</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71385#post71385</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Where McCain clearly tripped up, several times, was in saying "Senator Obama doesn't understand..." when, even if you disagreed with Obama, he quite obviously did understand.</p></blockquote><p>He should also resist the urge to call anyone else "naive" &ndash; especially today.</p><blockquote><p>Wow. Have you ever seen a more disingenuous bunch than…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:40:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71383#post71383</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71383#post71383</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I agree with Sage and RB in that I thought McCain had the better of the debate purely in terms of technique.</p></blockquote><p>He did as well as any politician with 26 years experience and one failed presidential bid behind him would do. Nothing special, very professional.</p><p>Where McCain <strong>clearly</strong> tripped…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:28:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Rowe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71379#post71379</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71379#post71379</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Best comment on the TPM thread:</p><blockquote><p>McCain's got more positions than the Kama Sutra on Ritalin.</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:10:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71375#post71375</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71375#post71375</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Wow. Have you ever seen a more disingenuous bunch than the House Republican leadership today?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:51:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71374#post71374</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71374#post71374</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Just in ...</p><p><a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/fox_rasmussen_polling/fox_rasmussen_swing_state_polling_september_28_2008" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">HUGE swing-state poll results for Obama</a>.</p><p>No wonder Redbaiter is even more upset than usual.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:44:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71372#post71372</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71372#post71372</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Mind need boggling?</p><p>Check out <a href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/09/bailout_defeated_207_to_226.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">some of the usual suspects on Kiwiblog</a> on the bailout story.</p><p>Laugh? Cry? You choose.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:41:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71359#post71359</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71359#post71359</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Could he get any more weird and erratic?</p></blockquote><p>Yes?  I don't want to even imagine how, but as far as weirdness is concerned too much is not enough. :)  But I do have a nomination for the McCain-Palin campaign anthem...  </p><p><a href="http://nz.youtube.com/watch?v=FKeQpeDkoGc" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://nz.youtube.com/watch?v=FKeQpeDkoGc</a></p><p><strong>NSFW!</strong>  But soothing words for difficult times, don't you…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:02:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Luke Williamson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71358#post71358</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71358#post71358</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						My brain hurts . . . wasn't it the Repubs who sunk it? I'n Roger Kerr fan but it was interesting to read his editorial in NZ Herald yesterday for a view of why too much govt intervention caused the problem in the first place. Always fun to see the…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:02:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71355#post71355</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71355#post71355</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>McCain has declared that <a href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/09/mccain_says_now_is_not_time_to.php" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">now is not the time to assign blame</a> for the bailout failure &mdash; 90 minutes after issuing a statement containing these words:</p><blockquote><p>"Barack Obama failed to lead, phoned it in, attacked John McCain, and refused to even say if he supported the final bill ...This bill…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:57:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71354#post71354</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71354#post71354</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The correlation between congressmen voting against the bill and unsafe seats in the upcoming election may surprise you.</p></blockquote><p>Oh no it wouldn't, Jake. :)  But to be fair, there are people on both sides of the aisle who cast good faith votes against the bail out &mdash; and it is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:53:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71345#post71345</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71345#post71345</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Now that it has been convincingly demonstrated that McCain knows more about what is required to lead the US it is obvious that McCain should be president.</p></blockquote><p>Oh, of course. McCain knows how to do everything. Just check out <a href="http://angua9.livejournal.com/333767.html#cutid1" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this list</a>. I don't know why the country hasn't fallen in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:10:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jake Pollock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71344#post71344</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71344#post71344</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The correlation between congressmen voting against the bill and unsafe seats in the upcoming election <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/09/swing-district-congressmen-doomed.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">may surprise you.</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:08:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Luke Williamson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71343#post71343</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71343#post71343</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I agree with Sage and RB in that I thought McCain had the better of the debate purely in terms of technique. Interestingly, when I spoke to friends in US, they didn't see it that way and mnetioned all the things the subsequent polls mentioned &ndash; no eye contact, disrespect…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:06:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71342#post71342</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71342#post71342</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Que?</p></blockquote><p>That's Spanish for "WTF?", right?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:03:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tim Hannah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71340#post71340</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71340#post71340</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>As far as why does it matter that Obama constantly said he agrees with McCain. The presidency is not a place to learn on the job. Now that it has been convincingly demonstrated that McCain knows more about what is required to lead the US it is obvious that McCain…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:00:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71333#post71333</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71333#post71333</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						BTW, Sage, thank God McCain flew back to Washington to work his bipartisan leadership magic, ay?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:28:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71332#post71332</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71332#post71332</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>While the shit hits the fan, MSNBC's Chris Matthews blames McCain for the failure of the bailout vote &mdash; "He shouted 'charge' and Republicans retreated"</p></blockquote><p>House Republican Minority Leader John Boehner all been all over National Radio this morning blaming... Nancy Pelosi.  I had no idea she had such enormous…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:25:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71331#post71331</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71331#post71331</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>While the shit hits the fan, MSNBC's Chris Matthews blames McCain for the failure of the bailout vote &mdash; "He shouted 'charge' and Republicans retreated":</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VdwNhACoUs" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VdwNhACoUs</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 08:52:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71325#post71325</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71325#post71325</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>As far as why does it matter that Obama constantly said he agrees with McCain. The presidency is not a place to learn on the job.</p></blockquote><p>But it is a place for McCain to make up coherent economic policy on the fly?  Or Palin to learn to string together three…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 06:54:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71324#post71324</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71324#post71324</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And another observation, Paul, what would be your reaction if Three News spiked a news story because Clark and Key went into lockdown and refused to comment on the record or  make themselves (or spokesmen) available for interviews?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 06:38:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71323#post71323</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71323#post71323</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>think a couple of head-to-head's between the old party leaders is needed; they're going to win or lose Treasury benches afterall, not the minors. But then the minors will be king-makers so there needs to be a forum for them all. I say this, however, as a supporter of Labour,…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 06:35:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>sagenz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71319#post71319</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71319#post71319</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						given all the snide remarks made here about inexperience it is more than a little ironic that when Obama is exposed for being inadequate but charismatic his polls bounce on the basis of being nicer and people here are wondering why.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 03:35:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>sagenz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71318#post71318</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71318#post71318</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Russell &ndash; For the first time we agree on McCain.  I thought he nailed Obama in pure debate but far less empathetic.  His contempt for Obama was too obvious and he seemed a little smug at times.</p><p>As far as why does it matter that Obama constantly said he agrees…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 03:33:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bob Munro</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71315#post71315</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71315#post71315</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Independent Andrew Halcro who debated with Palin many times during the 2006 gubernatorial campaign <a href="http://www.adn.com/opinion/sarah-palin/story/539459.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> explains Palin’s methods</a> and why she’s so successful.</p><blockquote><p>Palin's debate style is simple: She's a master, not of facts, figures or insightful policy recommendations, but at the fine art of the non-answer, the glittering generality.…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:13:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71312#post71312</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71312#post71312</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						One suspects they'll have her pumped up with 40mg of speed and loose the pitbull.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:26:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Deborah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71311#post71311</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71311#post71311</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://interviewpalin.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Sarah Palin Interview Generator</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:24:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71306#post71306</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71306#post71306</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>A debate's more dynamic, and although she'll be rehersed, I don't expect her to manage it for the full duration.</p></blockquote><p>One suspects they'll have her pumped up with 40 or so 30 second sound bites. She'll probably ignore the question, come out with a sound bite that vaguely matches, and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:38:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71290#post71290</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71290#post71290</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I don't disagree with Don or Peter however, Palin has to at least meet a new and higehr threshold where she's credible in this forum and it won't be as simple as it was in the one-on-one, edited interviews. </p><p>She'll have less control over the questions, less time to contemplate…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:51:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Haynes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71285#post71285</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71285#post71285</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"... a Biden annihilation of Palin ... will not happen. Whatever Palin's credentials she isn't that stupid (really) and she can talk."</p><p>I'm with Don. Obama's campaign have been circulating a video of Palin debating in the gubernatorial contest in Alaska. Apparently the pitbull with lipstick thing works in the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:41:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71280#post71280</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71280#post71280</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But expectations were so low that her high-school-debate styling was greeted as a triumphant performance.</p></blockquote><p>Frankly, that's an insult to high school debaters.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:07:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71277#post71277</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71277#post71277</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>This. She's expected to do so badly that if she doesn't just giggle and fall over, it'll be seen as a win.</p></blockquote><p>They pulled that off with the convention speech. It really was not great. But expectations were so low that her high-school-debate styling was greeted as a triumphant performance.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:55:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71271#post71271</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71271#post71271</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Cool Hand Luke</p></blockquote><p><sniffle></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:30:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71265#post71265</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71265#post71265</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Look for yet another "Palin" bounce which, one hopes, will happen far enough away from the election not to matter.</p></blockquote><p>I'd be satisfied if this is the best they achieve, but I'm optimistically hoping that she is revealed for what she is; a hopeless candidate entirely out of her depth.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:21:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Luke Williamson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71263#post71263</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71263#post71263</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yowza, McCafferty is angry! Love it! That's what I would like to see Biden dishing out to Palin in their "debate" but I'm pretty sure I'll be disappointed. The more media canings for Sarah the better, I say. It's going to take every ounce of her ignorance to outdo the…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:14:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>cindy baxter</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71256#post71256</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71256#post71256</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The format is structured to just be sound bite exchange rather than actual debate</p></blockquote><p>Exactly.  It's fairly obvious why. </p><p>the CBS interview was extraordinary.  CNN's Cafferty <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8__aXxXPVc&amp;feature=related " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">wasn't impressed.</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:01:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Luke Williamson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71252#post71252</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71252#post71252</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I thought one of the points of having Biden was that he was allowed to savage the opposition when Obama wasn't. Let's see him just shred her. Unfortunately, it won't happen because I believe the format is structured to just be sound bite exchange rather than actual debate.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:46:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71240#post71240</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71240#post71240</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>A tie in the Palin / Biden debate will be news (so no doubt the news media will welcome that) and it will be seen as defeat for Biden/Obama</p></blockquote><p>This. She's expected to do so badly that if she doesn't just giggle and fall over, it'll be seen as a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:24:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71237#post71237</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71237#post71237</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Putin is rearing his head into Alaskan airspace</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.nbc.com/Saturday_Night_Live/video/clips/couric-palin-open/704042/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">There's more</a>.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:20:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71235#post71235</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71235#post71235</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>If stringing together random snippets of English counts as talking.</p></blockquote><p>Have a dig around for older, pre-VP, interviews. A different Palin emerges. </p><p>Whilst the current crop of interviews make Palin look like an idiot the debates will be different. She won't even be asked ... "give me some examples of...".…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:20:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jolisa</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71233#post71233</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71233#post71233</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/hendrikhertzberg/2008/09/foreign-countri.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hendrik Hertzberg</a> from the New Yorker.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:13:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jolisa</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71232#post71232</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71232#post71232</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Whoops, yeah. What Lucy said.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:12:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jolisa</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71231#post71231</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71231#post71231</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Whatever Palin's credentials she isn't that stupid (really) and she can talk.</p></blockquote><p>If stringing together random snippets of English counts as talking. I mean, really, you've seen the Couric interviews? (And the <a href="http://www.nbc.com/Saturday_Night_Live/video/clips/couric-palin-open/704042/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> SNL take on them</a>, which uses verbatim quotes).</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:12:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71229#post71229</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-debate-and-onwards/?p=71229#post71229</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>That will not happen. Whatever Palin's credentials she isn't that stupid (really) and she can talk.</p></blockquote><p>OTOH, every time she's been interviewed in an even vaguely unscripted manner it has not gone well, which is why she has been shielded from the press so much. She got pretty incoherent at…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:07:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
