<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Hard News: The Daily Embarrassment</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Parks</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=39310#post39310</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=39310#post39310</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I remember &ndash; I think it was an early speaker post by Dave Hayward &ndash; where he analysed the energy policies of all the major parties in the leadup to an election, and found, to his surprise, that the Greens had the most sensible [policies].</p></blockquote><p>While that was a bit…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:05:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Snowy</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=39287#post39287</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=39287#post39287</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Russell it's reassuring to see that despite writing for APN's Listener you're still prepared to criticise APN's Herald.<br />And good choice of title too, as the country's largest paper focussed primarily on our largest city, the Herald is an embarrassment.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:48:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=39274#post39274</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=39274#post39274</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But that diversion would obviously just be pedantry. And “guns are dangerous” is a more sensible starting point for a conversation about guns &amp; gun use than “such-and-such power source is intrinsically evil”.</p></blockquote><p>Ah, you need to spend some time talking to NRA lobbyists. "Sensible? Guns don't kill people! People kill…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:49:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Parks</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=39273#post39273</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=39273#post39273</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It wasn’t a quote, it was an anecdote. I was agreeing with the sentiment in this comment from Kracklite: “I'm definitely tempted [to vote Green], but I have the feeling that they'd try to ban the Sun if they found out that it was nuclear powered."  This also prompted my…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:35:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=39254#post39254</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=39254#post39254</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The guy was describing a form of energy as “intrinsically evil”. I very much doubt he was meaning to say: “nuclear fission power is intrinsically evil. Though let me be clear, that fusion power... much respect. I’ve gots me a lot of time for that fusion.”<br />He was displaying an…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 01:16:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=39149#post39149</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=39149#post39149</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Why? They're doing a fabulous job as the PR wing of the National party.</p><p>That's what they are, right? A party political organ?</p></blockquote><p>And it would have worked too... if it weren't for those pesky kids!  And Scooby-Doobie-Doooooo Too!</p><p>I'mm sure  the more excitable Kiwiblog regulars would agree with you…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 23:57:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>rodgerd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=39146#post39146</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=39146#post39146</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Could the Herald possibly get someone with some credibility to write on this issue?</p></blockquote><p>Why?  They're doing a fabulous job as the  PR wing of the National party.  </p><p>That's what they are, right?  A party political organ?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:03:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Parks</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=39091#post39091</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=39091#post39091</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Nuclear fusion is a wholly different process to nuclear fission, and one with a completely different hazard profile.</p></blockquote><p>Does its hazard profile include being intrinsically evil?</p><blockquote><p>Yes they [fission &amp; fusion] both involve atomic interactions, but that is about where the similarities end. Failing to "qualify" between the two is a…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:05:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Philip  Wilkie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38991#post38991</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38991#post38991</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The response that you quoted is a reaction to someone saying nuclear power (no qualification) is intrinsically evil.</p></blockquote><p>Nuclear fusion is a wholly different process to nuclear fission, and one with a completely different hazard profile. There are no fusion reactors generating power at present, and there will likely be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 07:15:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>InternationalObserver</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38989#post38989</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38989#post38989</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						</aside><br /><br />I heard on RadioLive news today speculation that Nandor may 'step down' at the next election.  (It sounded like double-speak ie they are trying to push him out to make way for the new co-leader)  Are the Greens crazy? Unless he's now on P, why would they not want/convince him…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 01:45:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>tussock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38985#post38985</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38985#post38985</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						What, I can't put a quote in a quote now? Pfft. It's bad enough the comments don't thread, but now I discover I can't even <em>pretend</em> they do. Ah well.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:16:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>tussock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38983#post38983</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38983#post38983</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><blockquote><p>RB: James is funny, leave him be.</p></blockquote><p>Wot, no telling off for me? Are all my efforts in vain?</p></blockquote><p>Sorry K-dog. You da man, but your posts have too much going for them for me to even hint you should ease up. I feel your pain regarding Hoagland, badastronomy.com being…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:12:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Parks</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38981#post38981</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38981#post38981</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Steve: "Does this guy know how that life-sustaining ball of fire in the sky works?"</p><p>Philip: "Well yes. Last I looked at the science, Big Yella is supposed to be kitted with a nuclear FUSION reactor under the hood, runs on hydrogen, and burps helium out the tail pipe. Very…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:28:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38969#post38969</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38969#post38969</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Wow. That Orcinus blog that's been tracking Ron Paul is awesome.</p><p><a href="http://dneiwert.blogspot.com/2007/12/ron-pauls-friends-in-black-and-white.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">This</a> astonishing (and possibly unreliable) "outing" of Paul as a regular  in white nationalist circles by a fellow traveller is amazing (read the comments!).</p><p>And there's a bundle in  <a href="http://dneiwert.blogspot.com/2007/06/ron-paul-vs-new-world-order.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ron Paul vs. the New World Order</a>.</p><p>He's a John…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:58:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38966#post38966</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38966#post38966</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>This guy has based his whole blog around pulling apart arguments made by denialists of many stripes</p></blockquote><p>Good comments too. The first one for <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/2007/12/can_someone_explain_to_me_why.php" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this</a> post explains the Ron Paul thing quite well:</p><blockquote><p>Ron Paul is a paleoconservative, the most mainstream American political tendency ideologically closest to neofascism. Other paleocons…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:27:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38965#post38965</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38965#post38965</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>This is getting ridiculous. Could the Herald possibly get someone with some credibility to write on this issue?</p></blockquote><p>How would they tell?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:17:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alex Coleman</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38963#post38963</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38963#post38963</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Indeed, there seems to be a consistent pattern among the various pseudoscientific cults.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">This</a> guy has based his whole blog around pulling apart arguments made by denialists of many stripes.</p><p> He shows that it doesn't matter which colour the stripes are the arguments stay the same. Creationists argue like holocaust…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 19:58:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Philip  Wilkie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38959#post38959</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38959#post38959</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>nulcear</p></blockquote><p>Oh damm, I'll never be able to say anything bad about GWB ever again...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:46:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Philip  Wilkie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38958#post38958</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38958#post38958</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Does this guy know how that life-sustaining ball of fire in the sky works?</p></blockquote><p>Well yes. Last I looked at the science, Big Yella is supposed to be kitted with a nuclear FUSION reactor under the hood, runs on hydrogen, and burps helium out the tail pipe. Very green and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:28:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38956#post38956</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38956#post38956</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>There's an article here by a space journalist attending a presentation by Richard Hoagland, the Face on Mars guy. The parallels are obvious, and overall it's actually pretty sad and dreary:</p></blockquote><p>This was a major problem for the anti-GE lobby here. I had a bit of contact with them, and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:23:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38955#post38955</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38955#post38955</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://norightturn.blogspot.com/2008/01/climate-change-more-denial-in-herald.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">No Right Turn</a> comprehensively sorts out the Herald's latest guest denial tract, the one from Brian Leyland (whose connections are not even mentioned in connection with the story).</p><p>This is getting ridiculous. Could the Herald <em>possibly</em> get someone with some credibility to write on this issue?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:17:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Parks</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38932#post38932</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38932#post38932</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						With regards to Truthiness, interesting that the link to the explanation of the word goes to Wikipedia. That 'bringing democracy to knowledge" comment was a dig by Colbert at Wikipedia. So, I now know all about "Truthiness" from Wiki. But... Colbert was being sarcastic in his reference to Wikipedia, mocking…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 14:51:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Parks</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38929#post38929</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38929#post38929</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'm definitely tempted [to vote Green], but I have the feeling that they'd try to ban the Sun if they found out that it was nuclear powered.</p></blockquote><p>Careful, Kracklite. You never know when a Green might be reading.<br />Seriously, their stance sometimes reminds me of the attitude expressed in a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 14:33:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38911#post38911</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38911#post38911</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>You see the same things...</p></blockquote><p>Indeed, there seems to be a consistent pattern among the various pseudoscientific cults.  On one hand they claim the authority of science and bring up whatever studies they can find and misrepresent them, and other times, because they can't find acceptance among the scientific community…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 13:11:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38881#post38881</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38881#post38881</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>There is a difference between journalism and science. The <em>National Journal</em> article presents a journalist's argument, not a scientific argument.<br />In my summary of the article above I fairly deliberately gave it the benefit of the doubt, in focussing on the substantive points that directly attacked the <em>Lancet</em> paper. It…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:42:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38876#post38876</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38876#post38876</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Oh, and I've been meaning to post this for a few days.</p><p>Via <a href="http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/12/the-forecast-in-the-streets/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">RealClimate</a>, <em>The Age of Consequences: The Foreign Policy and National Security Implications of Global Climate Change</em>, a report from the Center for Strategic and International Studies and the Center for a New American Security.</p><p>I'm not so…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:15:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38875#post38875</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38875#post38875</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>How could I have missed it?</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truthiness" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Truthiness!</a></p><p>"What we're doing is bringing democracy to knowledge."</p><p>D'oh!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:12:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38874#post38874</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38874#post38874</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p><em>Vote Green. Etc.</em></p><p>I'm definitely tempted, but I have the feeling that they'd try to ban the Sun if they found out that it was nuclear powered.</p></blockquote><p>I've said this before, but I've found my experience in trying to get to the bottom of the GE issue very helpful in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:02:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38873#post38873</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38873#post38873</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>James, you sound like an adolescent.</p></blockquote><p>I'm reminded of something <a href="http://www.jamesoberg.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">James Oberg</a> said about debating UFO cultists, although he may have been quoting someone else: it's like wrestling a pig &ndash; you assume undignified positions, get covered in mud and in the end you're left with the suspicion that the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:22:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>tussock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38871#post38871</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38871#post38871</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>RB: James is funny, leave him be.</p><p>The National Journal article is pretty silly too, the best critique of the lancet study being that it was misreported in media headlines, much like all statistical data is. Error bars are there for a reason, and that study had some big-ass error…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:38:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38868#post38868</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38868#post38868</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>So we plebs should just bow down before your great wisdom and let the wise scientists dictate to us what is right and what is wrong as they look down on us from their great ivory towers? No thanks.</p></blockquote><p>James, you sound like an adolescent.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:07:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38867#post38867</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38867#post38867</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>RB, your comments on the National Journal article? You have cited the Lancet study number frequently in your posts.</p></blockquote><p>It's interesting and apparently fairly damning, but perhaps you should wait a bit before describing a single article as "proof positive" of "destruction".</p><p>One of the most vocal critics of the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:05:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38866#post38866</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38866#post38866</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Well, your beloved scientific process certainly appears to have broken down in the case of the Lancet study doesn't it?</p></blockquote><p>No, not at all.  The point is is that it is <em>in the process</em>.  Again (and again and again...), <em>no single paper</em> is important.  It is the accumulation of a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:53:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Bremner</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38865#post38865</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38865#post38865</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Well, your beloved scientific process certainly appears to have broken down in the case of the Lancet study doesn't it?</p><p>So we plebs should just bow down before your great wisdom and let the wise scientists dictate to us what is right and what is wrong as they look down…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:15:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38862#post38862</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38862#post38862</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Sophistry, and disingenuous to boot.</p><blockquote><p>just proof positive that we should always be skeptical of scientific studies.</p></blockquote><p>"Always".  No discrimination suggested.</p><p>You used the "destruction" of the Lancet study because, supposedly:</p><blockquote><p>This link may appear to be way OTT at first glance but it is relevant to the discussion on…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 11:14:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Bremner</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38839#post38839</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38839#post38839</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em> to support a solipsistic belief that scientific articles are mostly 'a load of crap'.</em></p><p>Kracklite,<br />Go back and read what I wrote.  I never said anything of the kind.</p><p>I wrote <br />__that "scientific studies" by respected organizations that appear in respected publications that are taken very seriously and impact…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 14:33:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38833#post38833</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38833#post38833</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>the article on the Lancet study [...] is a devastating destruction</p></blockquote><p>Not exactly.<br />The article raises a great many questions (some admittedly well worth asking) &mdash; but it does not provide definitive answers. That must await detailed peer review, and attempts by other researchers to replicate the <em>Lancet</em> study's findings.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 13:27:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38831#post38831</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38831#post38831</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Doesn't it bother you that the study is apparently a load of crap?</p></blockquote><p>I've read it, I'm reading it again.</p><p>It bothers me that it is <em>apparently</em> dubious, but I am not a statistician, I do not work in media studies and the National Journal is not exactly a disinterested…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 13:25:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Bremner</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38815#post38815</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38815#post38815</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Kracklite,</p><p>Did you read the article on the Lancet study?  It is a devastating destruction of a study that has received a lot of play in the media over a period of years and has certainly aided in shaping opinions and perhaps in developing policy options on one of the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 11:25:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38809#post38809</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38809#post38809</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>This link may appear to be way OTT… I wonder how many GW studies are as badly flawed as the Lancet study. Quite a few would be my guess.</p></blockquote><p>A non-sequitur in fact: ‘I have counted no cattle in the field, therefore there are no oranges in the orchard.’</p><blockquote><p>"scientific…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 10:50:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38807#post38807</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38807#post38807</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And then there was Malcolm McPhee: Climate of fear starting to make my temperature rise in Fridays Herald ...</p><p>Which was given a brisk fisking by Hot Topic, where it was described as "breathtakingly nonsensical".</p><p>Jim Hopkins shared his boundless wisdom on the topic of climate change on Friday too.…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 10:38:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Bremner</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38792#post38792</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38792#post38792</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						This link may appear to be way OTT at first glance but it is relevant to the discussion on GW because it shows that "scientific studies" by respected organizations that appear in respected publications that are taken very seriously and impact public attitudes and potentially public policy can in fact…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 08:08:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38762#post38762</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38762#post38762</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						With regard to "ice ages", the onset might not be gradual, over thousands of years. <a href="ftp://seaice.colorado.edu/pub/koni/press/THE%20CLIMATE%20OF%20MAN.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">This article by Elizabeth Kolbert</a> (pdf) in the New Yorker cites ice-core drilling in Greenland that has produced evidence that on the way into an ice age (and possibly also coming out) temperatures might swing…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:06:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38720#post38720</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38720#post38720</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>...and once again we go sailling on stormy seas to conspiracist la-lal-land with a crew of straw men.</p><p>The frequency of hurricanes is uncertain and not taken as a major make-or-break issue.  The suggestion that it is is misinformation.</p><p><a href="http://environment.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn11661&amp;print=true" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Scientist's</em></a> summary says,</p><blockquote><p>General climate models are not detailed enough to…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 13:59:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38706#post38706</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38706#post38706</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Allready they are scouring last seasons data so they can upgade some tropical storms to hurricanes, just to make sure  Karen that goes to hurricane strength for 12 hours gets counted, on that only on one sensor reading<br /><a href="http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL122007_Karen.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL122007_Karen.pdf</a></p><p>And guess what the above average prediction is then met for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:54:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38704#post38704</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38704#post38704</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>well, that's because millipedes don't have opposable thumbs.</p></blockquote><p>You don't need thumbs to fire any kind of gun I can think of.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:46:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38703#post38703</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38703#post38703</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Speaking of the tiny and violent, I just powered up the demo version of the original, teeny-pixel graphic Worms last night. It didn't play very well in OSX's classic thingy, but it's still better than any of the other versions.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:36:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38702#post38702</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38702#post38702</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Armed millipedes, one for DARPA</p></blockquote><p>Erratum/Addendum: one for the Ignobel prize too, I'd think.  I can see the papers now: 'Self-harm and suicide incidences among millipedes: an investigation.' 'Marksmanship and potential military applications among the arthropoda'  War games and exercise with army ants (of course) against commando squads of...</p><p>Yes,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:20:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38701#post38701</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38701#post38701</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>well, that's because millipedes don't have opposable thumbs.</p></blockquote><p>Well, a decent ergonomist could probably design a gun that could be used with opposable legs &ndash; after all a millipede has plenty to spare.  It would take nanotech to achieve though.</p><p>Armed millipedes, one for DARPA</p><p>Re the 'new ice age',…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:16:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38700#post38700</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38700#post38700</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						3. Citing the Journal of Scientific Exploration?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 10:27:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Philip  Wilkie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38698#post38698</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38698#post38698</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Had a read of the Russian link you made and at this point either the English translation is a cockup, or you need to clear a nice big space on the floor to have a good roll around:</p><blockquote><p>"Hothouse gases may not be to blame for global warming. At any…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 10:03:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Bremner</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38697#post38697</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38697#post38697</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>RB,</p><p>The hurricane predictions for the past 2 seasons have been way off</p><p><br /><a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/news/broward/story/320606.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.miamiherald.com/news/broward/story/320606.html</a></p><p>__A different team at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration predicted 13 to 17 named storms, seven to 10 hurricanes and three to five intense hurricanes.</p><p>The actual results for the 2007 season: 14 named storms,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 09:29:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Bremner</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38696#post38696</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38696#post38696</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And here we have a prediction of global cooling...</p><p><a href="http://en.rian.ru/analysis/20080103/94768732.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://en.rian.ru/analysis/20080103/94768732.html</a></p><p>__Earth is now at the peak of one of its passing warm spells. It started in the 17th century when there was no industrial influence on the climate to speak of and no such thing as the hothouse effect. The…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 09:17:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38694#post38694</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38694#post38694</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Which is more than you can say for most of those donating to the National Party.</p></blockquote><p>You're quite right, Idiot/Savant.  I've donated a little under two grand to the National Party this millennium through membership dues and various fundraisers.  Oddly enough, National &ndash; like every other political party in this…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 23:52:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38693#post38693</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38693#post38693</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Whilst I agree that simply providing funding to a political party in exchange for an honour is unseemly this is not what is at issue in the UK. In fact, that aspect of party funding was investigated and a decision taken not to prosecute.</p></blockquote><p>The fact that the UK's ever-flexible…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 23:21:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Yamis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38690#post38690</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38690#post38690</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Would they use little guns because their feet are very little and an ordinary sized gun and bullets would probably shoot all their legs and body off with one shot?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 22:16:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Heather Gaye</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38689#post38689</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38689#post38689</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>A millipede couldn't shoot itself in the foot more often...</p></blockquote><p>well, that's because millipedes don't have opposable thumbs.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 15:55:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38687#post38687</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38687#post38687</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Google it. State of Fear is endlessly cited by "sceptics" as if it were something other than an airport novel. It's bizarre.</p></blockquote><p>I know, hence my incredulity.  I await <em>Doctor No</em> being used as an insightful and authoritative analysis of Chinese foreign policy.</p><p>A millipede couldn't shoot itself in the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 14:37:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38686#post38686</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38686#post38686</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yes, I should be clear "the hidden paybacks" refer to the British situation.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 14:01:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38684#post38684</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38684#post38684</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It is the secrecy of donantions, the hidden paybacks and then the subsequent lying about that funding that is "smells" and "reeks".</p></blockquote><p>Yeah, that's an interesting one. The original Herald story stated Robertson's donation to National as a fact, but National's campaign manager <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/1/story.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10337052" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">told TV3 in 2005</a> that  "There are no…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:32:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38682#post38682</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38682#post38682</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Regarding I/S's strong words about cash for honours and the fisaco that has been taking place in the UK...</p><p>Whilst I agree that simply providing funding to a political party in exchange for an honour is unseemly this is not what is at issue in the UK. In fact, that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:16:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38680#post38680</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38680#post38680</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And now you're using a partisan review of a work of pulp fiction by Michael Crichton?!</p></blockquote><p>Google it. <em>State of Fear</em> is endlessly cited by "sceptics" as if it were something other than an airport novel. It's bizarre.</p><p>Peter Doran's NYT op-ed about <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/27/opinion/27doran.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Crichton's misuse of his research</a> is worth reading.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:02:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38676#post38676</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38676#post38676</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And now you're using a partisan review of a work of pulp fiction by <em>Michael Crichton</em>?!</p><p>Bozhe moi.  What next, <em>The Chronicles of Narnia</em>?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 11:05:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38674#post38674</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38674#post38674</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>For those who asked for the reference</p><p><a href="http://www.scientificexploration.org/jse/abstracts/v19n2a5.php" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.scientificexploration.org/jse/abstracts/v19n2a5.php</a></p><p>David Deming ,Journal of Scientific Exploration<br />Book review of State of Fear<br />...An example is provided by revisionist efforts of some researchers to extinguish the existence of a Medieval Warm Period. The politicization of science is a threat to the process of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 10:15:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38667#post38667</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38667#post38667</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						(Erratum: For "exploratory" above read "confirmatory".)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 22:04:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38666#post38666</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38666#post38666</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Just in case some missed that 50% is one half</p></blockquote><p>Your point being...?</p><p>(i) 50% is actually a pretty high proportion of variance to be captured by a principal component.<br />Depending on how many variables went into the analysis, it might be possible to interpret a PC with only 10%…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:56:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38665#post38665</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38665#post38665</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The ever busy Mann has turned his hand to north atlantic hurricanes  but this time the trick cyclist has two closely related papers <br />Sabbatelli and Mann 2007</p><blockquote><p>Evidence for a modest undercount bias in early historical Atlantic tropical cyclone counts</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2007/2007JD008385.shtml" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2007/2007JD008385.shtml</a></p><p> Mann and Sabbatelli 2007</p><blockquote><p>The influence of climate state…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:31:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38664#post38664</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38664#post38664</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>A couple more articles on GW that have appeared recently</p><p>The first one catalogues the temps of the last year which don't exactly scream GW.</p><p><a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071219/COMMENTARY/10575140" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071219/COMMENTARY/10575140</a></p><p>The comment about hurricanes is obviously of more interest to me as I live here on the Gulf coast. After the big K, according…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 18:22:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38663#post38663</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38663#post38663</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Actually, almost all the editorial board of Nature have PhDs and are active scientists/academics.</p></blockquote><p>Yes indeed, but my point was that their qualifications are not necessarily directly pertinent to every paper that they receive, rather their qualifications make them competetent  to assess the potential worth and methodology of a paper…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 18:03:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38660#post38660</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38660#post38660</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>... actually, looking at the staff qualifications of Pew is like looking at the qualifications of the editorial board of a journal such as Nature &ndash; it would be to completely miss the point. Papers submitted for publication are always sent out for review externally. Referees remain strictly anonymous.</p></blockquote><p>Actually,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 17:16:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38659#post38659</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38659#post38659</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>... actually, looking at the staff qualifications of Pew is like looking at the qualifications of the editorial board of a journal such as <em>Nature</em> &ndash; it would be to completely miss the point.  Papers submitted for publication are always sent out for review externally.  Referees remain strictly anonymous.</p><p>'Accounts…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 15:38:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38658#post38658</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38658#post38658</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Your meme seems to be if they are not scientists dont trust them</p></blockquote><p>Sloppy use of 'meme' &ndash; the correct word would be 'implication'.</p><p>And, as ever, it's a misrepresentation.  </p><p>Pew is a polling and policy analysis organisation.  See</p><p><a href="http://www.pewclimate.org/policy_center" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>:</p><blockquote><p>The Pew Center provides research, analysis and recommendations for federal,…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 15:30:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38657#post38657</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38657#post38657</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Kracklite, the Deeming report was in the Journal of Scientific Discovery 2005 as I pointed out.</p></blockquote><p>No, you did not.  <em>Deming's</em> paranoid mutterings revealing a conspiracy to 'get rid' of the MWP have <em>no</em> source, attribution or context.  Do you want that to be taken seriously as 'testimony'.</p><blockquote><p>This is…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 15:19:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38656#post38656</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38656#post38656</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Russell says :...Pew is an excellent organisation with high standards, and I've learned to place trust in it. That's the point...</p><p>Oh really ?</p><p>Did you check out their credentials of the staff listed.  Your meme seems to be if they are not scientists dont trust them</p><p><a href="http://www.pewclimate.org/about/staff" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.pewclimate.org/about/staff</a></p><p>Well a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 15:17:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Trevor Nicholls</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38654#post38654</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38654#post38654</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And the idea that we should make dramatic policy decisions with huge consequences based on highly uncertain predicitions is just nuts.</p></blockquote><p>Of course choosing to do nothing is also a policy decision &ndash; one not exempt from huge consequences of its own.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:40:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Philip  Wilkie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38653#post38653</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38653#post38653</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>James, sorry but it isn't like that. By pumping gigatonnes of GHG's into the atmosphere we have ALREADY made a policy decision about impacting the climate. Doing nothing was only an option back at the start of the Industrial revolution.</p><p>What you are really proposing is to simply gamble that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:31:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Bremner</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38652#post38652</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38652#post38652</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>I should add that naturally those making the most effort to discourage us from changing our pattern of behaviour appear to be those (or appear to be funded by those) individuals and organisations which have a significant investment in our continuing on our current path.</em></p><p>The "Exxon gave them grant…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:26:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38651#post38651</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38651#post38651</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p><em>And the idea that we should make dramatic policy decisions with huge consequences based on highly uncertain predicitions is just nuts.</em></p></blockquote><p>Governments regularly act on much worse information than we currently possess about the planet's climate system. The Iraq war springs to mind... and let's not mention economic policy.</p><p>As…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:23:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Bremner</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38650#post38650</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38650#post38650</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>but they make one thing obvious... paleoclimate exhibits a high degree of apparently chaotic variability, that we simply do not understand. If I was faced with an automation process that behaved like this my professional reaction would be "don't fuck with it".</em></p><p>Exactly.  The idea that we understand how the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:14:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Trevor Nicholls</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38649#post38649</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38649#post38649</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>There is more than enough doubt on the subject of global climate stability to caution against continuing to choose to follow a pattern of behaviour that could have such profoundly negative consequences.</p></blockquote><p>I should add that naturally those making the most effort to discourage us from changing our pattern of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:12:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Trevor Nicholls</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38648#post38648</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38648#post38648</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Quoting James Bremner:</p><blockquote><p>There is more than enough doubt on the subject of GW to caution against rushing headlong into decisions and treaties etc. that would have such profoundly negative consequences.</p></blockquote><p>Let's look at the flip side:</p><p>There is more than enough doubt on the subject of global climate stability…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:06:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38647#post38647</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38647#post38647</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>RB, by your normal logic, any trust formed by a holy Trinity of evil, such as conservative, Christian oilmen (how bad can you get!!) would automatically be discredited and anything they say must automatically be wrong.</p><p>What has changed?</p></blockquote><p>Nothing has changed. Pew is an excellent organisation with high standards,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:03:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Philip  Wilkie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38646#post38646</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38646#post38646</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Sorry to have to repeat myself, but the link Kracklite gave to the US Academey of Science report is a start:</p><p><a href="http://books.nap.edu/execsumm_pdf/11676.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://books.nap.edu/execsumm_pdf/11676.pdf</a></p><p>As Gareth correctly identifies, these attempts to dismiss AGW as come kind of statistical mistake are mere politics. You are not dealing with the science here Steve. If…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 13:49:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38645#post38645</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38645#post38645</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						For most people it is not feasible to form a rational opinion on the global warming debate. Unless you actually are a climatologist, you have only the word of climatologists on the matter. Their opinions conflict. You can try to understand them, but to an outsider they all appear to…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 13:49:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Bremner</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38644#post38644</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38644#post38644</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>the trusts were formed from the money of a conservative Christian oilman, and another Pew trust still offers scholarships for evangelical Christians.)</em></p><p>RB, by your normal logic, any trust formed by a holy Trinity of evil, such as conservative, Christian oilmen (how bad can you get!!) would automatically be discredited…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 13:49:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Bremner</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38643#post38643</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38643#post38643</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>A couple more articles on GW that have appeared recently</p><p>The first one catalogues the temps of the last year which don't exactly scream GW.</p><p><a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071219/COMMENTARY/10575140" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071219/COMMENTARY/10575140</a></p><p>The comment about hurricanes is obviously of more interest to me as I live here on the Gulf coast.  After the big K, according…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 13:45:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38642#post38642</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38642#post38642</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I think one thing that can be said is that there's an uptick in debate about climate change in the media. How much that reflects a genuine shift in positions amongst experts is another matter entirely.</p><p>Other reading: <a href="http://nzclimatescience.net/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=178&amp;Itemid=30" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the report on Bali by Christopher Monckton</a>. He abuses all and sundry present…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 12:41:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38641#post38641</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38641#post38641</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Phillip, Ive done your research for you...</p><p><em>Nearly a decade later, more than a dozen studies using<br />alternative proxy data and reconstruction methods have,<br />moreover, independently reaffirmed earlier studies such as<br />MBH98, producing millennial or longer hemispheric temperature<br />reconstructions which agree with the those reconstructions<br />within estimated uncertainties.</em><br />J of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 12:12:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38640#post38640</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38640#post38640</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>If I might interpose a thought....</p><p>None of this has anything to do with the real science of climate. The chances that the "consensus" view of how the climate system works will somehow change dramatically in the near future are essentially zero. The last vaguely credible working climate scientists who…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 12:00:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38639#post38639</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38639#post38639</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Kracklite, the  Deeming report was in the Journal of Scientific Discovery 2005 as I pointed out.</p><p>I have   quoted the DIRECT WRITTEN testimoney of Wegman.<br />Its says his statistical methods are incorrect and his conclusions cant be supported by his analysis.</p><p>And if you set a very high bar in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 11:35:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Philip  Wilkie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38638#post38638</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38638#post38638</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Philip wants it spelt out bell, book and candle.</p></blockquote><p>Musical comedy indeed.... how appropriate. Wegman's testimony has been repeatedly misappropriated for this silly purpose. All Wegman was doing was commenting on the statistics... not the data.</p><blockquote><p>Wegman had been tasked solely to evaluate whether the McIntyre and McKitrick (2005) (MM05)…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 11:18:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38637#post38637</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38637#post38637</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The interesting bit from the NY Times is ..</p></blockquote><p>100% fact-free and pure rhetoric.</p><blockquote><p>A major person working in the area of climate change and global warming sent me an astonishing email that said “We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period.</p></blockquote><p>Let's see, where to begin?  Unattributed,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 11:14:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38636#post38636</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38636#post38636</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The "it was hotter in the Medieval Warm Period" (MWP) meme is another dishonesty doing the rounds.</p></blockquote><p>Global evidence using tree rings etc rather than local historical records supports the conclusion that on average, temperatures did not drop.  </p><p><em>New Scientist's</em> guide has a mention of that too.</p><p>Another one of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 11:02:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38635#post38635</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38635#post38635</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The interesting bit from the NY  Times is ..<br /><em>Today’s interpreters of the weather are what social scientists call availability entrepreneurs: the activists, journalists and publicity-savvy scientists who selectively monitor the globe looking for newsworthy evidence of a new form of sinfulness, burning fossil fuels. </em></p><p>as for the MWP…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 11:01:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38634#post38634</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38634#post38634</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Philip wants it spelt out bell, book and candle.<br />so lets go to the testimony of professor Wegman and his commmittee of the National Academy of Sciences(NAS)</p><p><a href="http://energycommerce.house.gov/reparchives/108/Hearings/07192006hearing1987/Wegman.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://energycommerce.house.gov/reparchives/108/Hearings/07192006hearing1987/Wegman.pdf</a></p><p>__Most of the proxy series show little structure, but the last two show the characteristic ‘hockey stick’ shape. The principal component-likemethodology in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 10:55:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Philip  Wilkie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38633#post38633</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38633#post38633</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>but none suggest that it has been warmer at any time in the past 1000 years than in the last part of the 20th century.</p></blockquote><p>The "it was hotter in the Medieval Warm Period" (MWP) meme is another dishonesty doing the rounds. Between about 1000 &ndash; 1500 AD temperatures in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 10:47:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38632#post38632</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38632#post38632</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Re the Mann graph, a quick look at <a href="http://environment.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn11462&amp;print=true" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Scientist's</em> Guide for the Perplexed</a> leads to <a href="http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11646" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this</a>, which has a link to a <a href="http://books.nap.edu/execsumm_pdf/11676.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">2006 report of the US National Academy of Science</a> (pdf)</p><blockquote><p>The basic conclusion of Mann et al. (1998, 1999) was that the late 20th century warmth in the…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 10:28:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Philip  Wilkie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38631#post38631</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38631#post38631</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The fact that there have recently been more articles in various newspapers that deal with some aspect(s) of GW hype shows some movement on the subject.</p></blockquote><p>Showing up ignorant journalism as hype, discredits the journalist....not the scientist. On the other hand "smear by association" is always a handy dodge.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 10:20:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Bremner</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38630#post38630</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38630#post38630</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>Rather tends to support O'Sullivan's thesis on GW.</p><p>Er, how exactly?</em></p><p>The fact that there have recently been more articles in various newspapers that deal with some aspect(s) of GW hype shows some movement on the subject. </p><p>There isn't any doubt that the NYT leans liberal, and when they run…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 09:42:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Philip  Wilkie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38629#post38629</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38629#post38629</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The passage of time has shown Mann to have published rubbish, I think the statistics he used was assesed by experts as being "graduate student level"</p></blockquote><p>Likely Steve Curtis doesn't know the difference between an eigenvector and a steinlager, but he seems happy to uncritically regurgitate this nonsense he's picked…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 09:29:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38628#post38628</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38628#post38628</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Not a good sign for the "Global warming, we are all going to die!!" crowd when the NYT, of all publications, starts publishing articles skeptical of it.</p></blockquote><p>Oh right. It's so sceptical that the guy it quotes says " I don’t doubt that climate change is real and that it…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 09:19:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38627#post38627</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38627#post38627</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>From Stuff:</p><blockquote><p>Kiwi electricity consultant Bryan Leyland recently led a team of international sceptics to a climate conference in Bali.</p></blockquote><p>I don't know Mr Leyland from swiss cheese,but "electricity consultant" doesn't exactly inspire confidence that he's an expert in the science of global warming and melting ice sheets.</p><p>Or that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 09:10:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Bremner</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38625#post38625</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38625#post38625</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Not a good sign for the "Global warming, we are all going to die!!" crowd when the NYT, of all publications, starts publishing articles skeptical of it.</p><p>I also see a "on one hand, and then on the other' rather balanced article on GW on Stuff.co.nz this morning.</p><p>Rather tends…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 07:01:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38623#post38623</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38623#post38623</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Governments should hand out gongs to their political donors (just ignore what we said yesterday). We need a group of public spirited wealthy men to support political parties, to ensure they pursue sound, sensible and responsible policies, and so they don't have to seek the support of ordinary voters instead.…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 23:14:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38622#post38622</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38622#post38622</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						As Jule Fairey said, it was the Labour Party's lack of nous in giving this award that was most disturbing for me. However deserving he may or may not have been of the order, it was certainly an uncalculated move. They're going to need to work hard to regain enough…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 20:38:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38621#post38621</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38621#post38621</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>As for Complaining to the Press Council about a misleading article well the infamous Professor Michael Mann, of the  discredited hockey stick fame did so back in 2004</p><p>.. Dr de Freitas’s change of viewpoint from being a scientist warning about global warming in Listener articles published in the 1980s…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 20:27:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38620#post38620</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38620#post38620</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I find all this credential bashing pointless.</p></blockquote><p>I have the highest respect for accountants.  In fact I even had one as a girlfriend.  Looks like Lucy Lawless, lots of fun to be with, we're still good friends.  </p><p>OK, now hand a Black and Decker to your accountant and tell him/her…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 19:42:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38617#post38617</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38617#post38617</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Continental drift evolved into the more accurate term plate tectonics <br />Wegener was kicked around because he wasn’t a trained geologist</p></blockquote><p>That is at best a gross oversimplification and it certainly wasn't a neat, smooth evolution. Indeed, Wegener met a lot of purely prejudicial opposition, but he proposed a mechanism that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 15:15:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38616#post38616</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38616#post38616</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Cushing was actually a National Party fundraiser for a while. Curiously, though, his knighthood was not greeted with mean-spirited and defamatory accusations like this.</p></blockquote><p>No, Russell, I guess  the mean-spirited and defamatory shit had well and truly been heaped on Cushing's head long before.  And I don't recall <em>The Herald</em>…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 15:03:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38615#post38615</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38615#post38615</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Graeme: not that different, no.  Plenty of people on both sides of the fence seem to regard it as unseemly to reward your donors (though it will be interesting to see how many of them are consistent about it in future &ndash; and how many oppose the transparency regime of…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 14:39:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>simon g</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38614#post38614</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38614#post38614</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Would it be unkind to note here that Sir Tony O'Reilly was knighted by Tony Blair (sorry, Her Majesty), and that O'Reilly owned various media which might have influenced public opinion about Blair's government? </p><p>Perhaps the NZ Herald would like to launch one of its famous campaigns, on how the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 13:51:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38613#post38613</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38613#post38613</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>his knighthood was not greeted with mean-spirited and defamatory accusations like this</p></blockquote><p>Well, blogs weren't all that big at the time :-) And anyway, is what DPF said in his "cash for honours" post all that far from what I/S said in his:</p><blockquote><p>Bluntly, this smells. It reeks. It stinks…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 13:42:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38612#post38612</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38612#post38612</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Or trying to extract themselves from having to criticise National in future if they award honours to their donors?</p><p>The aristocratic tone of that editorial is also pretty horrifying.  We need a group of public-spirited wealthy men to guide the state and political parties, lest they be forced to seek…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 13:10:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38611#post38611</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38611#post38611</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And yet they're saying explicitly "people should get gongs for giving scads of cash to political parties".</p></blockquote><p>I'd wager that's John Roughan, trying to stay the right side of his "the more money in politics the better" argument.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 12:58:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38610#post38610</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38610#post38610</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>There's a distinct undertone of contrition in the Herald's editorial on Owen Glenn this morning ...</p></blockquote><p>And yet they're saying explicitly "people should get gongs for giving scads of cash to political parties".</p><p>If our honours system is going to be a rich boy's club for political cronies, then I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 12:04:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jane  Treadwell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38609#post38609</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38609#post38609</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Owen Glenn is making donations across the globe. One small Welsh rugby club thinks he's pretty ok... <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/south_east/7157688.stm " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Floodlights gift for rugby game</a>.</p><p>BTW what's up with the Herald online at present &ndash; getting gibberish the past few days and all the formatting's up the creek.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 11:44:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38608#post38608</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38608#post38608</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Selwyn John CUSHING, C.M.G., of Hastings. For services to business, sport and the arts.</p><p>This has political donor all written over it ( the CMG would suffice for his "contributions" to the areas listed).</p></blockquote><p>Cushing was actually a National Party fundraiser for a while. Curiously, though, his knighthood was not…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 11:19:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38606#post38606</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38606#post38606</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						There's a distinct undertone of contrition in the Herald's <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/466/story.cfm?c_id=466&amp;objectid=10484885" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">editorial on Owen Glenn</a> this morning ...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 10:48:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38605#post38605</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38605#post38605</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Looking back at previous New years honours<br /><a href="http://www.dpmc.govt.nz/honours/lists/index.asp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.dpmc.govt.nz/honours/lists/index.asp</a> checking out the last one done by Jenny Shipley( in those days they actually got the moniker Dame/Sir for the top honours) we see<br />Selwyn John CUSHING, C.M.G., of Hastings. For services to business, sport and the arts.</p><p>This has political donor…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 10:23:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Yamis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38604#post38604</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38604#post38604</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The deniers are all a little past their prime and I think craving a little attention Augie &ndash; Dutton &ndash; Mcshane. To their credit they do quote studies</p></blockquote><p>Well one of them <strong>certainly</strong> is.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 10:13:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Shep  Cheyenne</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38602#post38602</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38602#post38602</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Good on Don McKinnon, well deserved &amp; that uncle of mine for his good works.</p><p>An award for giving cash is bollocks really.<br />Like the "Free" Charity Hospital in Christchurch. It is State Funded. The rather bitter Dr of a few years ago is obviously trying for a Knighthood or is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 03:31:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38601#post38601</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38601#post38601</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>As I said, it's a legitimate story; it was just the Herald's treatment of it that rankled. The no-comment from National was interesting. The story implies he has he has donated there too.</p></blockquote><p>Um, sorry... I didn't read that into the story but I guess a less sinister explanation is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 21:17:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38600#post38600</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38600#post38600</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I’m not dismissing these scientists because they aren’t climatologist's under a narrow definition.<br />Desmogblog listed them as PhDs in Climatology from Canadian universities. If they cant get that right what exactly is the point they are making ,that Ball is a fraud? <br />I find all this credential bashing pointless. <br />There…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 20:58:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38599#post38599</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38599#post38599</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Steve, your argument seems to be along the lines of "if you're a botonist then you can't be an environmentalist".</p><p>I take it your'e using the Wikipedia definition of Climatolgoy, which in full reads &ndash;</p><blockquote><p>Climatology is the study of climate, scientifically defined as weather conditions averaged over a period…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 19:25:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38598#post38598</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38598#post38598</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Just want to give a big thanks to Russell for posting *actual content* during the silly season.</p><p>And Happy New Year to everyone!!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 19:23:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38597#post38597</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38597#post38597</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Talking of stupid statements, you should REALLY give the Tim Ball credentials battle a rest, because the facts are not on your side.</p><p>First, climatology is  scientifically defined as weather conditions averaged over a period of time.</p><p>And the topic of Tims PhD thesis:<br /> "Climatic change in central Canada :…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:56:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38596#post38596</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38596#post38596</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Jackie, all true. There are quite a few people who get honors who are honorable. There's also a few who are just rich, which could seem to cheapen the system. But I don't think so, any more than I think a degree from Auckland University is cheapened by the fact…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:23:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jackie Clark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38595#post38595</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38595#post38595</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>quote>Haven't honours always been for sale?<br />Aren't they an adult version of Santa Claus, bringing gifts to the boys and girls who have been good?<br />And doesn't the size of the gift depend on how many mince pies you've left out for Santa? (And which of his elves you've greased…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:10:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38594#post38594</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38594#post38594</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Would a national newspaper actually have anything more in it than the Herald?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:10:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Robyn Gallagher</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38593#post38593</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38593#post38593</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Bird Nest Roys are playing with the Ghost Club at the Rising Sun on Auckland on Wednesday night.</p></blockquote><p>Oh my! I haven't heard much of their stuff (funny, that), but I am Roys-curious, so I'll be there. And Celia is going to be playing too!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:03:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>richard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38592#post38592</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38592#post38592</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						That string of Herald columns really is laughable &mdash; Inhofe is a gold-plated clown, and seeing Owen McShane on his list of "experts" takes me back to Owen's regular laughable forays into climate skepticism on soc.culture.new-zealand back in the 1990s.  He was vigorously fisked then, but does not seem to…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:03:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38591#post38591</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38591#post38591</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The bottom line is that elections these days are almost never decided on well informed debate and accurate knowledge of the candidates.</p></blockquote><p>Wait. When did this _ever_ happen?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:57:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38590#post38590</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38590#post38590</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I agree with I/S. It looks as if he has bought himself an honour.</p></blockquote><p>I vote we go through the last... I dunno, 20 years of honours lists and see who's major contribution to society was to have money to fling around. Michael Faye for starters &ndash; throw millions of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:54:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38589#post38589</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38589#post38589</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The magnitude of the electoral funding reform debate, and people's very polarised opinions, just demonstrates how hugely money influences an election. This is the case whether it's directed at flooding the population with misleading advertising and sledging of the opposition, at defending against the other side doing exactly that, or…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:54:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38588#post38588</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38588#post38588</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>A question: can the people who are objecting to supposedly non-qualified people speaking on climate change raise similar objections next time we Jane Kelsey &ndash; a legal academic &ndash; pronounces on economic policy?</p></blockquote><p>Oh, don't start me on Jane Kelsey ... I am not a fan.</p><p>It's not so much…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:43:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Hosking</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38587#post38587</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38587#post38587</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It's typical of Kyoto-sceptic "experts" &ndash; most of them have a background in finance or economics, not science &ndash; McShane's web site says as much. Baron Lawson (who visited recently) is another example who comes to mind.</p></blockquote><p>Climate change is an economic issue. And Kyoto  &ndash; whatever you think of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:31:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>daleaway</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38586#post38586</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38586#post38586</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Haven't honours always been for sale? <br />Aren't they an adult version of Santa Claus, bringing gifts to the boys and girls who have been good? <br />And doesn't the size of the gift depend on how many mince pies you've left out for Santa? (And which of his elves you've greased…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:10:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Julie Fairey</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38585#post38585</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38585#post38585</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>What concerns me about Owen Glenn's honour is that again Labour is showing a startling lack of political nous, which doesn't bode well going in to an election year.</p><p>Maybe he deserves one, maybe he doesn't (and certainly, as someone to the left of Labour I have no issues with…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 15:59:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>omapere</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38584#post38584</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38584#post38584</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						One thing you could do (and I have) is email Fran your views on her piece. I even included a link to todays post by Russell suggesting she checks some of the wingnut company she is keeping when being a denier.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 15:46:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38583#post38583</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38583#post38583</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>As I said, it's a legitimate story; it was just the Herald's treatment of it that rankled</p></blockquote><p>If the story is that someone bought an honour, then it is the big story of the day &ndash; no matter who else got one, or how.</p><p>If that's not what happened, then…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 15:35:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>100 Word</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38582#post38582</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38582#post38582</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I'd just read O'Sullivan's list as a complete piss-take.  </p><p>I found Granny Herald's article on Shadbolt's most recent grandstanding rather grating.  How is popping an ad in the papers blitzing the government?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 15:26:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38581#post38581</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38581#post38581</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Oh, and the thing I was <em>supposed</em> to blog about before feeling the need to sort out the Herald's stuff ...</p><p><strong>Bird Nest Roys</strong> are playing with the Ghost Club at the Rising Sun on Auckland on Wednesday night. Yep, they're back together, for who knows how long. Not to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:51:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38580#post38580</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38580#post38580</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p><strong>RB:</strong> Owen McShane is also listed as a "prominent scientist"</p><p><strong>DH:</strong> For fuck's sake... honestly...</p></blockquote><p>It's typical of Kyoto-sceptic "experts" &ndash; most of them have a background in finance or economics, not science &ndash; McShane's web site says as much. Baron Lawson (who visited recently) is another example who comes…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:36:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Litterick</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38579#post38579</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38579#post38579</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>As I said, it's a legitimate story; it was just the Herald's treatment of it that rankled</p></blockquote><p>Agreed. I think it is all a matter of appearances. The Herald chose to take the "Labour donor" line, when the donations to the University and other institutions are more significant. At any…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:16:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38578#post38578</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38578#post38578</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>If only it was sold with a bag of kindling...</blockquote>Trouble with that is all the hot air gets cancelled out by the frothing of mouths but TV gardeners recommend it as a weed suppressant. ;-)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:53:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ewan Morris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38577#post38577</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38577#post38577</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"And O'Sullivan's column now reads like a wingnut blog, with all the bitter, conspiratorial muttering and graceless prose that implies."</p><p>O'Sullivan has been writing from the far right of the political spectrum for years now, though her columns do seem to be getting increasingly nutty. At least she now has…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:50:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38576#post38576</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38576#post38576</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I agree with I/S. It looks as if he has bought himself an honour.</p></blockquote><p>Fair enough, I guess. But his donation to the university's business school was the largest single donation to a New Zealand academic institution ever, he has committed himself to funding a Chair in Logistics at the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:38:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Litterick</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38575#post38575</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38575#post38575</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						There is so much to talk about in today's post. It is interesting to note the nutters list of climate change deniers includes at 92 "Dr. Denis Dutton, Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Canterbury in New Zealand and recipient of the New Zealand Royal Society Medal for…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:34:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38574#post38574</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38574#post38574</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Which is why those who perhaps really deserve it are nicely awarded by the other party. Jenny Shipley got her dame-hood equivalent from Labour, and I suspect Helen Clark will get something from National if she loses the next election.</p></blockquote><p>Fran was <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/466/story.cfm?c_id=466&amp;objectid=10431781&amp;pnum=0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">campaigning hard</a> for Doug Myers to get his "long…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:30:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Litterick</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38573#post38573</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38573#post38573</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>No matter what he's done, it just looks unseemly.</p></blockquote><p>What he has done is donate money to several institutions, including the Labour Party and Auckland University. He does not live here, he has played no part in public life here. Until the University donation, most New Zealanders would have not…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:23:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38572#post38572</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38572#post38572</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Which is why those who perhaps really deserve it are nicely awarded by the other party.</p></blockquote><p>Or by the community, and bugger the politicians.</p><p>As for the Herald, read it online <em>with an adblocker</em>.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:22:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38571#post38571</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38571#post38571</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Seriously, is the Herald good for anything these days apart from starting your BBQ? I always remember that it was a nice thick paper, you could buy the Saturday edition and you'd be set for a fire pretty much for the next week.</p><p>If only it was sold with a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:21:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38570#post38570</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38570#post38570</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>I want to cancel my subscription but it is such a bugger that we have a monopoly in Auckland.</em></p><p>Read it online?</p><p>It was actually quite readable on my PDA whilst I was in Ozzie over Christmas. Lamentably, Public Address was not. The WAP option only gave me links, but…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:12:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38569#post38569</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38569#post38569</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Russell Brown</strong> wrote:</p><blockquote><p>Owen McShane is also listed as a "prominent scientist"</p></blockquote><p>For fuck's sake... <em>honestly</em>...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:09:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38568#post38568</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38568#post38568</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>No matter what he's done, it just looks unseemly.</p></blockquote><p>Which is why those who perhaps really deserve it are nicely awarded by the other party. Jenny Shipley got her dame-hood equivalent from Labour, and I suspect Helen Clark will get something from National if she loses the next election.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:05:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38567#post38567</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38567#post38567</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And then there was Malcolm McPhee: Climate of fear starting to make my temperature rise in Fridays Herald ...</p></blockquote><p>Which was given <a href="http://hot-topic.co.nz/2007/12/29/the-herald-sends-good-sense-on-holiday/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">a brisk fisking by Hot Topic</a>, where it was described as "breathtakingly nonsensical".</p><p>Jim Hopkins <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/feature/story.cfm?c_id=26&amp;objectid=10484423&amp;pnum=0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">shared his boundless wisdom on the topic of climate change</a> on Friday too.</p><p>Is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:58:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38566#post38566</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38566#post38566</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I have to disagree on Glenn's honour.  No matter what he's done, it just looks unseemly.  And I'd rather see good people go unrecognised than undermine the integrity of the process and see our honours called into question in such a way.</p><p>At the same time, it's worth pointing out…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:52:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38565#post38565</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38565#post38565</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I think the restriction of donations to NZ nationals (which would also include National's major donors) was in the EFA right from the start ...</p></blockquote><p>It wasn't. The EFA as introduced contained nothing new on donations &ndash; all of that was introduced in the select committee.</p><p>The story (which hasn't…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:51:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38564#post38564</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38564#post38564</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And then there was <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/466/story.cfm?c_id=466&amp;objectid=10484420&amp;pnum=2" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Malcolm McPhee: Climate of fear starting to make my temperature rise</a> in Fridays Herald, the same day as O'Sullivan's diatribe. He sounded more like an opinionated "Drunk at the Bar" than someone I would expect a serious Newspaper to publish but he did give a disclaimer at…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:39:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Litterick</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38563#post38563</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38563#post38563</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>A cracking good post and particularly welcome in this season of no-news.</p><p>The Herald's attitude to the planet is ambivalent, to say the least. On the one hand, it has Green Pages; on the other, it values the opinion of an unqualified sceptic as much as a professional. Such was…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:26:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38562#post38562</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38562#post38562</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But I wonder on what position you would have taken (or did) if some rich prick gave mega bucks to the National party and recieved a knighthood in his christmas stocking</p></blockquote><p>That happened quite a while back in some cases. But given Glenn's long-term contribution to the country of his…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:25:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>douglasof240</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38561#post38561</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38561#post38561</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>My immediate reaction to the article was similar to yours &mdash; a nasty, spiteful little piece especially given that two high profile Nats were also honoured.   </p><p>I want to cancel my subscription but it is such a bugger that we have a monopoly in Auckland.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:13:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Raymond A Francis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38560#post38560</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38560#post38560</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I guess you do have a point on Owen Glenn, he did give $7.5 Million to Auck Unni<br />But I wonder on what position you would have taken (or did) if some rich prick gave mega bucks to the National party and recieved a knighthood in his christmas stocking<br />Especially…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 11:57:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Anthony</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38559#post38559</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38559#post38559</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Or you can direct your protests towards the nearest brick wall which may well be a more effective option...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 11:51:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38558#post38558</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38558#post38558</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Any grounds to lodge a Press Council complaint, if there's enough evidence of deliberate misinformation?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 11:33:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38557#post38557</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-daily-embarrassment/?p=38557#post38557</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 11:32:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
