<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Hard News: The Big 2012 US Election PAS Thread</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=275615#post275615</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=275615#post275615</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>For example, he repeated that old Republican lie about how Obama never made a single vote as a a Senator because he was far too busy preparing to run for President. Completely untrue.</q></p><p>Now, you could fairly make the point that due to the nature of the primaries Obama did…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 09:12:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=275613#post275613</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=275613#post275613</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						A good <a href="http://election.princeton.edu/2012/11/17/gallups-man-misses-the-point" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">blog entry from Sam Wang</a> (the Princeton poll analyst) about the hissy fit that Gallup have thrown around having their polling accuracy compared.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 23:54:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ross Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=275007#post275007</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=275007#post275007</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Eye Eye Cap'n. </p><p>Something incisive?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 09:20:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=275003#post275003</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=275003#post275003</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Fang you very much..</strong><br /><q>I wish there was a function whereby <br />I could put tiny wee pointed teeth <br />in between my smiles</q><br />some kind of file protocol maybe?<br />or an 'authordontist' perhaps...<br />:- )</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 07:21:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=275001#post275001</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=275001#post275001</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>~....~<br />0....0<br />vvvv/</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 01:06:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hebe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274980#post274980</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274980#post274980</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I wish there was a function wherebye I could put tiny wee pointed teeth inbetween my smiles )</q></p><p>Heh. You beastie you.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:36:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274964#post274964</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274964#post274964</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>great comebacks...</strong><br /><q>Pressing “pause” would freeze time <br />while you whizzed off and checked</q><br />what you need is a...<br /><strong>Magic Boomerang!</strong><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eh4zqPyHlII" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eh4zqPyHlII</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 16:31:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274954#post274954</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274954#post274954</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Quite. The guy didn't seem to offer much credibility from the get-go.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:34:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>webweaver</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274953#post274953</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274953#post274953</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yes &ndash; the Republican guy on Media3 was short on facts and a bit long on truthiness for my tastes. </p><p>For example, he repeated that old Republican lie about how Obama never made a single vote as a a Senator because he was far too busy preparing to run for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:32:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graham Hughes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274935#post274935</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274935#post274935</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I really enjoyed media3 last night (sunday) however I saw something alarming.<br />There were two panel people ( not panel beaters ) discussing the election in USA. One obviously a gentle and thinking democrat.............and a guy called Carl.......both americans..............there was good banter but Carl really dissapointed me by among some…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:00:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274872#post274872</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274872#post274872</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> I understand that problems in the underlying sims cascade into the final result.</q></p><p>As I understand it, a greater degree of uncertainty in the poll analysis and aggregation would, in general, produce a wider spread of potential results (this might move the 270+ percentage a bit). A mistake in the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 21:47:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274869#post274869</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274869#post274869</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Add up all the probabilities on the red side and you would get about 8%, and on the blue side gives you about 92%.</q></p><p>Yup. That would, in fact, be how the number 92% was arrived at. Given that, how is it not accurate to say that the simulations are…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 21:07:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274868#post274868</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274868#post274868</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So in some respects, the 92% is doind a similar job to expressing a confidence interval, but it is a different thing in the finer level of detail.</q></p><p>Heh, yes, it's a degree of trust that you can't trust.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 20:51:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274866#post274866</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274866#post274866</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Maybe this will help with visualizing the 92% thing as a distribution. I just noticed on the right hand side of the methodology page there is a graph called Electoral Vote Distribution. It shows the probability that Obama receives a certain number of Electoral College votes. Sorry I don’t know…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 20:16:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274860#post274860</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274860#post274860</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But people only have so much time and energy to absorb information. With so much media content focusing on poll results, it surely must be less likely that the electorate is well informed about policy</q></p><p>I saw an echo of this concern in a <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-20246741" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">BBC article</a> on poll analysts I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:13:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274859#post274859</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274859#post274859</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So 92% isn’t the confidence interval itself, relating to the statement “Obama gets 270 or more Electoral College votes”,</q></p><p>You are kind of sorta correct that it is not the case that 92% is the confidence interval. Let's try this summary of Step 7 of Nate's methodology:<br />From the polls…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:40:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274858#post274858</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274858#post274858</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Hopefully it means there is a 92% chance that the statement "Obama gets 270 or more Electoral College votes" is true. What's missing of course is reporting of confidence intervals and such.</q></p><p>So 92% isn't the confidence interval itself, relating to the statement "Obama gets 270 or more Electoral College…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:53:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Green</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274857#post274857</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274857#post274857</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The graph in that second link was made with my script <a href="https://gist.github.com/2791866" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.  Brad disagrees with some of the assumptions used (e.g. fixed "house effect" and constant smoothing parameter), so I don't want to tar him with any of my simplifications.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:49:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Littlewood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274856#post274856</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274856#post274856</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Some context is that in "gold star" science you usually want to be 95 or 99 percent certain. Nate went with 92%, but he is more of a poker player I suspect.</q></p><p>Funnily enough, Silver's admitted he's used his skills in poker player to clean up in online and "friendly"…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 13:26:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274854#post274854</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274854#post274854</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And then I remembered this about <a href="http://www.statschat.org.nz/2012/11/02/what-a-72-chance-means/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">what the 72% means</a> back from when the number de jure was 72% rather than 92%. There are some interesting links there to follow up. </p><p>Note I don’t have trouble with anybody saying “72% chance of winning” and “too close to call” and believing…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 12:58:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274853#post274853</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274853#post274853</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>The number of combinations of parties isn’t too huge. The number that could form a government is even less. But how to work out what the chances are of one of the combinations being more likely than another is where I lose the plot. A matrix of friendliness between the…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 12:33:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274843#post274843</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274843#post274843</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the assumption that people that vote for a party are represented by the representatives</q></p><p>heh</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 10:38:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274842#post274842</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274842#post274842</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Brad Luen has put together an open script for aggregating NZ's polling data, weighted to actual election results and DimPosted.</q></p><p>And those orange dots scattered along the bottom identify topical events when you point to them.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 10:38:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274841#post274841</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274841#post274841</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I wouldn't know where to begin to do a computer simulation of that.</q></p><p>The number of combinations of parties isn't too huge. The number that could form a government is even less. But how to work out what the chances are of one of the combinations being more likely than…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 10:32:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274840#post274840</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274840#post274840</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>This is why concerns about being "wrong N times out of so many coin tosses" get tossed out.</q></p><p>Which, on my understanding, is a rewording of the very definition of "X% likely". Is there a better word for what this kind of confidence used in the 538 modeling is? Or…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 10:19:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274839#post274839</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274839#post274839</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Brad Luen has put together an open script for aggregating NZ’s polling data, weighted to actual election results and DimPosted. It’s an excellent effort. Unfortunately we lack the fine polling that the US has, which would be equivalent to polling at the electorate level. Does anyone know if this has…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 10:18:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274835#post274835</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274835#post274835</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>So having read the methodology for the 538 project (thanks David Hood), it is more based in doing good <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta-analysis" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">meta analysis</a> rather then simulation. The point estimates are done by "traditional statistical methods", as are most of the confidence limits for each point estimate. </p><p>The use of simulation seems to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 10:02:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274833#post274833</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274833#post274833</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It just seemed to me in the end that my guy simply hated Obama.</q></p><p>"I don't want a black guy to be president" isn't really an acceptable response in polite company these days.*</p><p>*I'm not saying your guy consciously thinks that. But the irrationality on display in some quarters seems…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 09:43:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274826#post274826</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274826#post274826</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Please don’t mention Baysian Statistics</q></p><p>How about bringing it up in comic form, with a very timely <a href="http://xkcd.com/1132" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">new xkcd</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 23:21:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274818#post274818</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274818#post274818</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Brad Luen has put together an <a href="http://bradluen.posterous.com/using-wikipedias-nz-election-data" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">open script</a> for aggregating NZ's polling data, weighted to actual election results and <a href="http://imgh.us/nzpolls18102012.svg" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">DimPosted</a>. It's an excellent effort. Unfortunately we lack the fine polling that the US has, which would be equivalent to polling at the electorate level. Does anyone know if this has…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 20:31:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274817#post274817</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274817#post274817</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thank you. Now I have no excuse not to get on it right away. </p><p>Keeping some of the finer detail of some of his adjustments private isn't playing the academic game properly, but if he wants to sell his results to somebody to earn a crust (he did say he…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 20:30:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274814#post274814</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274814#post274814</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The bad news is I haven’t read Nate Silver’s methodology yet</q></p><p>Allow me to <a href="http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/methodology" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">point you</a> in the right direction.<br />That said, he has been criticised for keeping the finer detail of some of his adjustments private, unlikely some of the academic based sites, which are completely open in their…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 20:16:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274813#post274813</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274813#post274813</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>In case anybody is still interested in the 92% all these hours later...</p><p>I'm your friendly resident statistician. That's the good news. The bad news is I haven't read Nate Silver's methodology yet. But if the description of it as a Monte Carlo simulation is right then I can help…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 19:57:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274808#post274808</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274808#post274808</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>8>))))</p><p>I wish there was a function wherebye I could put tiny wee pointed teeth inbetween my smiles )</p><p>-but &ndash; nemmind-</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 17:38:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Martin Lindberg</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274806#post274806</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274806#post274806</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Eric Dondero, who I think Russell linked to earlier, really is full of the win.</q></p><p>Surely the guy is some kind of political performance artist.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 17:31:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ross Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274804#post274804</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274804#post274804</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Islander I am shocked......spell check please! You whiley young thing!</p><p>Edit:  Shame shame shame on me. But I DO see it is now acceptable both ways!!!<br />Edit 2:  oh dear...it is worse that that!!  <hole in ground></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 17:23:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274799#post274799</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274799#post274799</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks Rich!<br />Another blog to while away my morning coffees with-</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 16:39:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274797#post274797</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274797#post274797</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						That's an awesome book &ndash; I believe I heard of it from <a href="http://pipeline.corante.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Derek Lowe's</a> "things I won't work with" blog series.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 16:35:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274793#post274793</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274793#post274793</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>That is a scientist with deep committment to his  research!</q></p><p>As occasional reading I am gradually working my way through the long out-of-print "Ignition! An Informal History of Liquid Rocket Propellants" by John D. Clark, which is a somewhat hair-raising memoir of the development of rocketry.<br />"Phil Pomerantz, of BuWeps,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 16:23:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274791#post274791</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274791#post274791</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/11/eric-dondero-boycott-democrat-libertarian.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eric Dondero, who I think Russell linked to earlier, really is full of the win</a>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 15:34:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274790#post274790</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274790#post274790</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Furthermore, if by chance our value is shown to be in error by more than 1 part in 1,000, we are prepared to eat the apparatus and drink the ammonia.”</q></p><p><em>That</em> is a scientist with deep committment to his  research!<br />Laughed out loudly -[scared the neighbour's dog-</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 15:31:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274789#post274789</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274789#post274789</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Mitt Romney sings his concession speech :)<br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0q2eGAjyGg&amp;feature=player_embedded" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0q2eGAjyGg&amp;feature=player_embedded</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 15:11:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ross Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274784#post274784</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274784#post274784</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Please don't mention Baysian Statistics.  It will start a firefight around here.......</p><p>92%  Bet the house on it.<br />75%  Bet the cat<br />51% Bet a dollar.</p><p>The best description of probablility / uncertainty I ever saw it this:</p><p>Dr C H Meyer NBS(1935ish)<br />on his recently calculated Heat Capacity of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 14:54:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274781#post274781</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274781#post274781</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Actually running these is slightly beyond my abilities, but I like the concepts.</q></p><p>They are fairly easy to do in excel (anyone keen could google monty carlo excel) but the real trick is correctly judging the probabilities you assign to potential outcomes, for which you generally need in depth knowledge…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 14:34:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274780#post274780</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274780#post274780</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monte_Carlo_method" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Monte Carlo methods</a>. With neat graphics. Actually running these is slightly beyond my abilities, but I like the concepts.</p><p>And suddenly, they're <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/08/us-carbon-tax-fiscal-cliff-idUSBRE8A71IU20121108 " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">discussing a carbon tax</a>, with evident seriousness. Light returns to the valley.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 14:26:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274774#post274774</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274774#post274774</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Here is an interesting article about how <a href="http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/industries/technology/maney/2004-10-26-univac_x.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">back in 1952</a> the press were saying the election was too close to call while the computer (The Univac) kept spitting out results that it was going to be a landslide.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 13:38:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274773#post274773</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274773#post274773</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>The Econmist calculated that it would add $7 trillion to the deficit over 10 years, using the words “cloud cuckoo land” and “innumerate”, pointing out that the only serious defence of it was the belief that once elected, Romney wouldn’t really do what he said he was going to do.</q>…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 13:32:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274768#post274768</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274768#post274768</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>While it is pretty thouroughly explained, I might as well offer my take as well.</p><p>538 is based on a kind of modelling generally called a Monty Carlo method, where you run the same test (election) lots of times with different random numbers (voter support) to see how likely each…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 13:15:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274766#post274766</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274766#post274766</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I don't really have a problem with the MSM reporting it as Obama 92% to win because this is seriously complex maths and stats.</q></p><p>Not sure I agree with that. Reporting it as 92% likely has a meaning that anyone with higher than year 10 maths can probably understand. Which…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 12:48:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274764#post274764</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274764#post274764</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>What puzzled me talking to my guy last night was that he was ultra-focused on the ballooning fiscal deficit &mdash; which is entirely understandable &mdash; but I couldn't get him to engage with the fact that Romney's budget proposal, as repeatedly expressed, simply didn't add up.</p><p>The Econmist calculated that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 11:41:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274763#post274763</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274763#post274763</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Ok I'll try and explain what I think is going on again with the caveat that I am not a professional statistician and I don't know exactly what the 538 group is doing.</p><p>What I think 538 are doing is using a mathmatical model that takes data from polls and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 11:40:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bevan Shortridge</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274759#post274759</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274759#post274759</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Now now, let's avoid the cliches</q></p><p>Thank you for that. I think.</p><p>And to David Hood</p><p><q>A (very) quick bit of digging into the results </q></p><p>Thank you very much for that too...PAS &ndash; explaining stuff in more detail since ages ago</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 11:15:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274758#post274758</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274758#post274758</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						In other upcoming elections, can I predict that Xi Jinping will win  Shangdong and thus become leader of China for the next ten years.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 11:13:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274754#post274754</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274754#post274754</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I would just like to point out that when Corin Dann explained this story to One News viewers this week, he said that Nate Silver had forecast that <strong>"Obama will win by 92%"</strong>.</p><p>This data journalism thing clearly has a way to go yet.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 10:32:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hebe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274753#post274753</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274753#post274753</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>There has to be something in the water,<br />or the air…</q><br />Something in the water might help!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 10:19:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274752#post274752</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274752#post274752</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Using their kind of analysis it is entirely plausible that they would (almost) never be wrong.</q></p><p>If so, then they should not say that it's 92% likely, but whatever the likelihood actually is. Because "92% likely" means what it means. I'm not disputing they could be more accurate than that.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 10:18:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274751#post274751</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274751#post274751</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Perhaps I’m missing something subtle in here. What does “92% likely” actually mean, in this case? Because “foregone conclusion” to me means “100% likely”.</q></p><p>My question too.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 10:15:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hebe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274750#post274750</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274750#post274750</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I talked to an American tonight who expounded at length on Obama’s failings in a way that didn’t seem to me to bear much relation to observable reality.</p><p>It does make you wonder what the hell’s going on.</q></p><p>My theory (today's one) is that many middle Americans'  financial futures and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 10:14:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274749#post274749</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274749#post274749</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>These are probably just stupid blow-hards, but a bit of historical awareness would come in handy for them. </q></p><p>I think so, on both counts.</p><p><q>Doesn't mean we should be stocking up the shelter with canned food and ammo. :) </q></p><p>What's the point of the shelter if it's not stocked?</p><p>@Bart…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 10:12:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274748#post274748</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274748#post274748</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And the polling are random (at least in theory)</q></p><p>But it isn't. When you poll people they don't answer randomly &ndash; that's the point. Each poll is influenced by the type of question asked, who is asking (male female) the economics of the area, the method used (cellphones/landlines/people on the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 09:55:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274747#post274747</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274747#post274747</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And the polling are random (at least in theory).</q></p><p>The polling is random. But determining the outcome of the election based on polling, demographics, exit polls, and partial results isn't. Bad data going in will mess it up, but Nate Silver is using multiple polls &ndash; once you mix together…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 09:52:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274746#post274746</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274746#post274746</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But whatever method he used you can’t simply take the 92% and treat it like a dice roll. It is not necessarily true that in 8 elections where he predicts a 92% chance he will have a 50% chance of being wrong.</q></p><p>If being 92% certain of something doesn't mean…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 09:50:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274745#post274745</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274745#post274745</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Not sure about this one. There are electoral systems in the world where people actually physically line up behind the candidates, and they can see where everyone is. This seems crazy to us, but it does seem to work out OK.</q></p><p>That's pretty much how the Iowa Democratic caucuses work,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 09:49:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274744#post274744</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274744#post274744</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>     I mentioned the election in passing; what a mistake. This person went into a vitriolic denunciation of Obama very like the Perigo piece.</p><p>I talked to an American tonight who expounded at length on Obama’s failings in a way that didn’t seem to me to bear much relation to observable…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 09:46:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274743#post274743</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274743#post274743</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>With so much media content focusing on poll results</q></p><p>But it's so much easier to report on a poll than to do a proper analysis of policy and the effects it has on people, by for example, studying the impacts in other countries where similar policies have been put in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 09:41:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274742#post274742</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274742#post274742</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But rolling dice is random (at least, in theory, I guess it’s actually a result of physics, the nature of the dice, the nature of the surface it lands on, and the way it gets thrown) at the time the dice gets thrown.</p><p>Elections aren’t random. If 90% of people…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 09:41:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274741#post274741</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274741#post274741</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Just like me and those dice.</q></p><p>Except that Nate Silverman is not rolling dice. I am not a statistician. But I know enough to know that the statistical analysis of as many polls as he is using is quite different from the analysis you use for a simple dice rolling…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 09:35:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274740#post274740</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274740#post274740</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>If I roll two dice, I expect I will roll something less than 11. But rolling a 10 or a 9 or an 8 or something lower is not a foregone conclusion. There is a smallish, but very real chance I will roll an 11 or a 12. And on…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 09:30:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274739#post274739</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274739#post274739</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I thought Perigo had been deported / not had his residency granted? Must have got the wrong end of the stick.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 09:17:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274738#post274738</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274738#post274738</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The balance of one’s mind must shift and sway markedly the longer one spends in a cave worshipping at the altar of Rand – getting covered in that much guano can’t be good.</p><p>The Libertarian response – is batshit crazy – particularly Perigo’s bullet for Obama view – he has…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 09:09:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274737#post274737</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274737#post274737</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The language they use: filth unfit to live, degenerates, dregs etc is very similar to what has been used in the lead-up to any number of bloody conflicts.</q></p><p>I don't know if it's particularly helpful to go there in this context, and there's a simpler (and sadder) explanation.  Is this…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 09:02:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274736#post274736</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274736#post274736</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>usually while drinking at a pub on Friday night”</q></p><p>Hey, don't diss the pub man! At least when we blather on in defence of the likes of Obama, those against him wont mind in the morning. and apologies if anyone's got upset will follow at the pubs default name (church)…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 08:47:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274735#post274735</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274735#post274735</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						While very much still in the anger stage of loss (I think the republican establishment genuinely was certain of victroy) the line among house Republican's seems to be forming that "as Obama ran with no policies, he has no mandate and we are free to oppose him". Now, I thought…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 08:44:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Martin Lindberg</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274734#post274734</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274734#post274734</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>…and they just love a good Civil War, and heck, they haven’t had one at home for a while…</q></p><p>The language they use: <em>filth unfit to live, degenerates, dregs</em> etc is very similar to what has been used in the lead-up to any number of bloody conflicts.</p><p>These are probably…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 08:34:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274733#post274733</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274733#post274733</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Round up…</strong><q><br />…the usual suspects are going into meltdown because their born-to-rule order is crumbling…</q><br />…sadly the logical outcome for a Me-centric society &ndash; don’t get your own way: throw a wobbly, behave badly, sulk, seek revenge!…<br />…and they just love a good Civil War, and heck, they haven’t had…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 08:12:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274731#post274731</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274731#post274731</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I guess I should have expected that libertarians would have the most violent, irrational sulks of all.</q></p><p>The thing, is there's plenty of pretty rational criticisms you can make of Obama and his administration from the libertarian/Objectivist (they're not synonymous IMO) &mdash; because he's not an Objectivist.  Just as I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 07:43:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274730#post274730</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274730#post274730</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It seems to have begun in the Clinton era, around 1993, when Texas Senator Phil Gramm said “People will be hunting Democrats with dogs."</q></p><p>Was that before or after the Wackos from Waco got curb-stomped by the ATF? Since leaving politics, Gramm has been part of the Wall Street machine…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 01:34:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ben Austin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274729#post274729</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274729#post274729</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I still don't get why Perigo says such awful things though. He doesn't have a dog in this game being an Auckland media pundit, who purports to hold libertarian views.</p><p>It would be like an American issuing threats against the slate of candidates in the Dunedin City Council elections. Pointlessly…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 01:18:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274728#post274728</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274728#post274728</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>This isn't just being a sore loser, it's a new kind of nasty and malevolent. I fear for us all.</q><br />It seems to have begun in the Clinton era, around 1993, when Texas Senator <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phil_Gramm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Phil Gramm</a> said  “People will be hunting Democrats with dogs." Prior to that even hardcore Reagan…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 00:18:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274727#post274727</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274727#post274727</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>But a couple of days before, I was talking with an old friend in the US who, though we often differ politically, agrees with my take on the fundamental human decencies needed in a society. I mentioned the election in passing; what a mistake. This person went into a vitriolic…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 23:57:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ben Austin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274726#post274726</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274726#post274726</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>That last paragraph of Perigo's comments is particularly awful and shows no connection with reality.</p><p>What punches did the Republican Campaign pull?  They seemed to attack him on everything from policy to origin, so I’m not quite sure what Perigo thinks they failed to mention. Although I don’t recall seeing…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 23:49:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hebe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274725#post274725</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274725#post274725</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Bloody hell. I had restrained myself recently from getting too excited about the US election, telling myself I was misexaggerating how barmy the right are. But a couple of days before, I was talking with an old friend in the US who, though we often differ politically, agrees with my…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 23:43:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274724#post274724</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274724#post274724</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I guess I should have expected that libertarians would have the most violent, irrational sulks of all.</p><p><a href="http://www.libertarianrepublican.net/2012/11/the-end-of-liberty-in-america-only.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The guy at LibertarianRepublican.net</a> never saw it coming &mdash; because he's <em>seriously</em> estranged from reality:</p><p><q>However, for me, I'm choosing another rather unique path; a personal boycott, if you will. Starting early this…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 23:00:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Littlewood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274723#post274723</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274723#post274723</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I mean, not unexpected, but … does anybody there have anything resembling self-awareness?</q></p><p>Jon Stewart was in his element on the Daily Show last night. It's got to the stage where he's no longer making fun of the Fox Network, he stoops to outright contempt. I could link to the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 22:23:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274722#post274722</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274722#post274722</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I’ve been waiting for some turnout figures. Wikipedia has <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turnout_in_the_United_States_presidential_elections" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">a long time series of historical data</a>, but nothing for 2012 yet. I seem to remember hearing about a “good” turnout, or was it even “big” turnout from those commentators,  but I want some numbers.  I can add up the 60,662,174…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 22:19:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hebe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274720#post274720</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274720#post274720</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the Republicans need to lose again and only then will the GOP purge itself to the degree it begins to position itself where it will have a chance of a win.</p><p>Demographics are against the Republicans </q></p><p>Or the GOP could take a cue from John Key: <em>appear</em> to be the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 21:59:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274719#post274719</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274719#post274719</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I agree – the Republicans need to lose again and only then will the GOP purge itself to the degree it begins to position itself where it will have a chance of a win.</q></p><p>Last night, I'd have doubted that &mdash; I would have thought that the Republican conversation would…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 21:34:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Armstrong</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274718#post274718</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274718#post274718</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>or it could lead to judgements about the people who support x if one is certain in ones knowledge on a matter.</q></p><p>I hope I'm not being too cynical by suggesting that this seems to be a pretty common response. It's why I don't read too many blogs / message…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 21:24:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274717#post274717</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274717#post274717</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And, sadly, I don't think Republicans lost big enough to puncture the denialist narrative that the only problem is that Romney wasn't extreme enough.</q></p><p>I agree  &ndash; the Republicans need to lose again and only then will the GOP purge itself to the degree it begins to position itself where…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 21:18:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274716#post274716</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274716#post274716</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>In the reading I have been doing this evening</q></p><p>Can I just say how much I <em>fucking love it</em> when y'all go and seek evidence on a question and digest it for the rest of us? I like to think it's the soul of the discussions here. Thanks.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 21:17:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274715#post274715</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274715#post274715</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Can I just note that even in the most “insane” states, one of every three people you see is voting for the Democratic Party?</q></p><p>Hence: "Keep Austin Weird"</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 21:14:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274714#post274714</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274714#post274714</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> I am thinking mainly about polls for things like preferred Prime Minister or current voting preference, which perhaps don’t add much to anyone’s understanding of the policy platforms that the prime Minister or the various parties are standing on. </q></p><p>In the reading  I have been doing this evening, it has…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 21:11:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274713#post274713</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274713#post274713</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						++1
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 21:05:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Armstrong</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274712#post274712</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274712#post274712</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I guess that depends on what is being polled.</q></p><p>Yes, I agree completely. I am thinking mainly about polls for things like preferred Prime Minister or current voting preference, which perhaps don't add much to anyone's understanding of the policy platforms that the prime Minister or the various parties are…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 20:52:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274711#post274711</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274711#post274711</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But people only have so much time and energy to absorb information. With so much media content focusing on poll results, it surely must be less likely that the electorate is well informed about policy</q></p><p>I'm actually kind of hopeful here, for reasons I think showed in the U.S. campaign.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 20:48:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274710#post274710</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274710#post274710</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Can I just note that even in the most “insane” states, one of every three people you see is voting for the Democratic Party?</q></p><p>I'd also like to suggest a general usage note.  Todd 'Legitimate Rape' Aiken and Richard 'being impregnated by your incestuous rapist is a gift from God'…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 20:47:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274709#post274709</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274709#post274709</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>though they could be far more significant in a truly close election.</q></p><p>Yup, that's kind of what I was saying. Hawaii might seem powerless and disengaged because the result is often known before a lot of them get a chance to vote. But on the day that it isn't, it…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 20:31:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Miche Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274708#post274708</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274708#post274708</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I want to keep my few remaining marbles right where they are, thanks.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 20:29:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274707#post274707</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274707#post274707</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>With so much media content focusing on poll results, it surely must be less likely that the electorate is well informed about policy.</q></p><p>I guess that depends on what is being polled. Getting poll results on why people support a view is very interesting, can highlight what the common conceptions…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 20:26:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274706#post274706</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274706#post274706</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> That states are being projected for a candidate in the east while people might still be deciding whether to bother going to vote in the west.</q></p><p>A (very) quick bit of digging into the results suggests that it is not as much of a difference as people worry about (and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 20:21:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Armstrong</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274705#post274705</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274705#post274705</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Russell, have any of your media-watching shows examined the influence or propriety of polling (as opposed to examining its accuracy)?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 20:14:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Miche Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274704#post274704</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274704#post274704</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						But they're bloody good things to have in place for when you're no longer in a war economy.  Don't refuse half a loaf, mate.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 20:13:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Miche Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274703#post274703</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274703#post274703</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Donald Trump has a massive case of Michael Jackson Syndrome &mdash; too much money and nobody in his life to tell him "No, Donald."
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 20:09:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Armstrong</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274702#post274702</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274702#post274702</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Everything is known, and you pick where you feel most comfortable. That's democracy in action too.</q></p><p>But people only have so much time and energy to absorb information. With so much media content focusing on poll results, it surely must be less likely that the electorate is well informed about…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 20:05:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274701#post274701</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274701#post274701</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I repeat my earlier point that foregrounding how people are likely to vote in political coverage, ahead of analysis of policies can't be a good thing, regardless of whether those polls are accurate or not. Can it?</q></p><p>Not sure about this one. There are electoral systems in the world where…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 19:54:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>G in J</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274700#post274700</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274700#post274700</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It's incredible that there are 49,000 people who would actually vote for Roseanne Barr.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 19:47:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bevan Shortridge</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274699#post274699</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274699#post274699</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I often wonder what the impact is of staggered closing times for the polling places? That states are being projected for a candidate in the east while people might still be deciding whether to bother going to vote in the west. I assume it's been studied, what effect that might…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 19:46:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Cady Adam</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274698#post274698</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274698#post274698</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I agree, the result of an election is mostly unpredictable. Mostly there are only speculations which are in support of a party.</p><p>[Edited to remove spam: Emma]</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 19:29:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274696#post274696</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274696#post274696</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>maybe that’s fair enough. But in the context of a proportionally elected parliament</q></p><p>Yes, and in a proportionately elected parliament, the information about other people's opinions is less useful. However, in New Zealand we do not have pure proportionality, and if I may highlight the plight of the ACT voter…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 18:59:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274695#post274695</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274695#post274695</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>There are a whole bunch of psych studies</q></p><p>There are all kinds of individual level psych studies showing you can affect people in the short term in all kinds of ways, I'm thinking more of acutal evidence at a population level with the real world of competing influences. A [[http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2012/11/opinion_polls_do_voters_pick_a_candidate_based_on_polling_data.html|bit…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 18:49:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Armstrong</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274694#post274694</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274694#post274694</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> the states they have vastly more knowledge at their fingertips </q></p><p>But is the accuracy of the polls even the main issue? I agree with Bart that inaccurate polling is the worst case scenario, but I repeat my earlier point that foregrounding how people are likely to vote in political coverage,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 18:24:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274693#post274693</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274693#post274693</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>To describe the Obama win as anything other than the expected result at any time this year would have been false.</q></p><p>Expected result and forgone conclusion are not the same thing.</p><p>I agree that Obama’s re-election was certainly <em>expected</em>.</p><p>If I roll two dice, I expect I will roll something…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 17:33:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274692#post274692</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274692#post274692</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Heh! Of course! I am now enlightened as to his, um, his, um &ndash; um?<br />(Srsly, I dont watch writers I enjoy, in whatever genre, having major meltdowns, very publicly. This was all a bit ugly &ndash; and sad. But -enjoyed your esposition-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 17:29:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274691#post274691</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274691#post274691</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>He's still writing SF I see...</q></p><p>Now now, let's avoid the cliches.  Good SF relies on reasonable and consistent extrapolation from known facts using known principles (with the odd bit of artistic licence such as FTL).  </p><p>I think that he's using the historiological approach of the counterfactual, which similar to,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 17:18:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274689#post274689</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274689#post274689</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I’ve never seen any actual evidence on this</q></p><p>There are a whole bunch of psych studies that show most people will change their position on any issue if told that the majority believe something different. Particularly if they are told what the majority believe before they are asked their opinion.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 17:10:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274688#post274688</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274688#post274688</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It wasn’t a foregone conclusion. If there are 9 elections where someone is a 92% to win, there’s a greater than 50% chance at least one of those elections will see an upset.</q></p><p>I'm not sure the probabilities calculated by 538 are quite that simple. I could be wrong but…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 17:06:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274687#post274687</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274687#post274687</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>How much of an impact does being told what’s very probably going to happen, or what everyone else thinks, or what you care about, have on individual choices?</q></p><p>I've never seen any actual evidence on this, but have heard lots of people worry about it- both people worrying that being…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 17:05:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274686#post274686</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274686#post274686</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						White men are about 36% of Americans &ndash; is voter participation so skewed that they form a majority of voters?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 17:04:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274685#post274685</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274685#post274685</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> the less-insane states</q></p><p>Can I just note that even in the most "insane" states, one of every three people you see is voting for the Democratic Party?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 16:53:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274684#post274684</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274684#post274684</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> ‘Obama doctrine’</q></p><p>The most important thing about the Obama Doctrine is that, like similar efforts by previous (moderate) presidents, it works.</p><p>It is by no means perfect of course. But the approach of leaping into conflict as quick as you can clearly does not work. Personally I favour approaches that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 16:47:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ross Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274683#post274683</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274683#post274683</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>An ABC commentator remarked how he thought the 2012 election was going to be the last presidential election "between two white men". </q></p><p>I think the meaning was that this will probably be the last majority of white men voting election. The comment and opinion today has indicated that the population…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 16:43:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274682#post274682</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274682#post274682</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> At what point do you start to get feedback loops? How much of an impact does being told what’s very probably going to happen, or what everyone else thinks, or what you care about, have on individual choices?</q></p><p>Which is why many countries ban polls.</p><p>But to get back to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 16:31:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274681#post274681</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274681#post274681</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>He’s still writing SF I see…</q></p><p>To be fair, his primary "mainstream" publisher nowadays &ndash; Tor Books &ndash; has some serious mana in the SF/F community and wouldn't let anything that generally shitty out of the slush pile without beating it to death with a shovel.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 16:07:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274680#post274680</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274680#post274680</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>100 seconds of Fox News the day after the election:</p><p><a href="http://youtu.be/ZK7neQNl5YM" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://youtu.be/ZK7neQNl5YM</a></p><p>I mean, not unexpected, but … does anybody there have anything resembling self-awareness?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 15:43:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274679#post274679</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274679#post274679</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Dear goodness!<br />I realise he’s a Mormon – &ndash; but this sounds like someone on rotgut whisky, right out of control.<br />I’ve enjoyed some of his work but waua! this isnt science fiction: this is <em>total rantdom</em> -</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 15:41:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hebe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274678#post274678</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274678#post274678</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>I’ve seen a lot of people comment on this. We have to remember that in the states they have vastly more knowledge at their fingertips about which precincts have returned their votes, and which have left to do so. Within each precinct they have a lot of information about how…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 15:40:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bevan Shortridge</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274677#post274677</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274677#post274677</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yes. Ork.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 15:39:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274676#post274676</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274676#post274676</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>He’s still writing SF I see…</q></p><p>From another planet, even.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 15:32:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bevan Shortridge</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274675#post274675</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274675#post274675</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						An ABC commentator remarked how he thought the 2012 election was going to be the last presidential election "between two white men". There followed an awkward exchange a minute or so later as a correspondent they crossed to and then others in the studio tried to nicely point out that…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 15:23:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bevan Shortridge</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274674#post274674</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274674#post274674</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						He's still writing SF I see...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 15:14:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Martin Lindberg</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274673#post274673</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274673#post274673</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>For SF geeks out there, I couldn't resist sharing Orson Scott Card losing all his shit in a manner that makes The Trumpernator look cool, calm and collected.</q></p><p>Man! That's a rant and a half!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 15:12:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274672#post274672</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274672#post274672</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						For SF geeks out there, I couldn't resist sharing <a href="http://www.ornery.org/essays/warwatch/2012-11-08-1.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Orson Scott Card losing all his shit</a> in a manner that makes The Trumpernator look cool, calm and collected.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 15:01:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274671#post274671</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274671#post274671</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I was almost hoping Romney might win, the reason being that when (as is likely) a major setback occurs to the US, such as a banking crash, the doctrinaire craziness of the right would be exposed.</q></p><p>You mean like the banking crash of 2008 under Bush? All that really lead…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 14:42:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274670#post274670</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274670#post274670</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I was almost hoping Romney might win, the reason being that when (as is likely) a major setback occurs to the US, such as a banking crash, the doctrinaire craziness of the right would be exposed.</q></p><p>Previous experience indicates that exposing this doctrinaire craziness doesn't make it go away or…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 14:39:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274669#post274669</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274669#post274669</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>[Ronald Reagan and John Kennedy talked with Soviet leaders because] </q></p><p>...they had a shedload of nukes pointed at the US?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 14:25:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hebe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274668#post274668</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274668#post274668</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Weta Workshops, hopefully.</q></p><p>Nah.Weta's would be more, well, human.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 14:07:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274667#post274667</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274667#post274667</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>When you say ‘Obama doctrine’, I’m not sure I know what it is?</q></p><p>I thought I should refresh my memory before commenting and thus found <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obama_Doctrine" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the Obama Doctrine article on Wikipedia</a>. It didn't know it was a thing either, which is why I put it in quotes.</p><p>The first paragraph…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 14:06:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274666#post274666</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274666#post274666</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If Tea Party pin up Bachmann &mdash; who also outspent her Democrat opponent twelve to one &mdash; loses her seat, I'm going to break the internet with schadentweets. You've been warned.</q></p><p>I would've been happy to have experienced that.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 14:02:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Armstrong</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274665#post274665</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274665#post274665</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Where do they get those Foxbots?</q></p><p>Weta Workshops, hopefully.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 13:59:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274664#post274664</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274664#post274664</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Just because the world economy seems as firmly welded as ever to military spending and war doesn't mean that we can't continue to oppose it.</q><br />This.<br /><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/22/us/politics/22costs.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/22/us/politics/22costs.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=0</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 13:27:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274663#post274663</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274663#post274663</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The “Obama doctrine” still treasures the projection of force, still endorses American exceptionalism, but it’s not actually insane – it’s just American foreign policy.</q></p><p>When you say 'Obama doctrine', I'm not sure I know what it is?</p><p>I'm not well enough informed anymore, but I do think it worth noting…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 13:22:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hebe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274662#post274662</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274662#post274662</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>On a related note, I was interested to see Karl Rove being poleaxed last night after his questioning Fox news’ early call of Ohio for Obama.</q></p><p>I didn’t see that but I thought some of the early calls were way too early in such a tight race and when voting…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 13:21:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274661#post274661</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274661#post274661</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I was almost hoping Romney might win, the reason being that when (as is likely) a major setback occurs to the US, such as a banking crash, the doctrinaire craziness of the right would be exposed. </p><p>(A situation where Romney refused a bailout, resulting in the collapse of the retail…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 13:20:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274660#post274660</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274660#post274660</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> "advances in health care, gay marriage, tax equitability or drug law reform" &mdash; all of them to some degree the fruit of citizen activism over years &mdash; are "trade-offs".</q><br />They're only trade-offs if they're accepted as such. I believe we'd be a lot better off today in NZ if a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 13:08:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Armstrong</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274659#post274659</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274659#post274659</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>grounded in the reality of the situation, rather than rating gaining high-drama narratives.</q></p><p>Yup.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 13:01:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274658#post274658</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274658#post274658</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And further, what does focussing on these questions do for democracy?</q></p><p>Well, from U.S. polling we known that 80% of voters made up their minds more than 60 days before the election and so were unmoved by the debates/Sandy/Trump/etc. I think it would be a good thing for democracy if…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 12:59:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274657#post274657</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274657#post274657</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Under Romney?</q></p><p>Should I have said "the <em>possibility</em>"?</p><p>Maybe Romney would have gone back to (or toward?) Bush levels of persecution? Maybe. Because I don't think Obama is, so even the possibility has <em>something</em> going for it.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 12:55:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Armstrong</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274656#post274656</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274656#post274656</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>How much of an impact does being told what's very probably going to happen, or what everyone else thinks, or what you care about, have on individual choices?</q></p><p>And further, what does focussing on these questions do for democracy? I guess that as a way of guaging people's reaction to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 12:53:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274654#post274654</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274654#post274654</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Neither party offered an alternative to pursuing the Vietnam war, yet the protests accelerated and arguably hastened its end. You seem to be arguing against any kind of concerned citizen activism beyond involvement with political parties and voting.</q></p><p>No, I'm not. I can't see where I did that at all.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 12:40:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274653#post274653</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274653#post274653</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Although … I’m not sure that a future where elections are forgone conclusions is actually all that healthy either.</q></p><p>Based on sports reporting (where the change has already happened), there will be a generational change of pundits informed by their guts to pundits informed by the stats and their guts.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 12:36:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274652#post274652</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274652#post274652</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Neither party offered an alternative to pursuing the Vietnam war, yet the protests accelerated and arguably hastened its end.</q></p><p>Actually Nixon promised to end the Vietnam war and it got him so tangled up that trying to find ‘peace with honour’ possibly extended it.</p><p>It didn’t help that by 1968…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 12:35:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274651#post274651</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274651#post274651</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If there are 9 elections where someone is a 92% to win, there’s a greater than 50% chance at least one of those elections will see an upset.</q></p><p>Hence the Heidi Heitkamp result</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 12:29:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274650#post274650</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274650#post274650</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> The “Obama doctrine” still treasures the projection of force, still endorses American exceptionalism, but it’s not actually insane – it’s just American foreign policy. I mean, a trade-off compared to what? What was the actual alternative on offer?</q><br />Neither party offered an alternative to pursuing the Vietnam war, yet the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 12:18:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274649#post274649</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274649#post274649</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It wasn’t a foregone conclusion. If there are 9 elections where someone is a 92% to win, there’s a greater than 50% chance at least one of those elections will see an upset. But which one, or will it be two, or none :-)</q></p><p>I understand that. But there are…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 12:14:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274648#post274648</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274648#post274648</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The possibility that the trajectory around whistleblower persecution would alter?</q></p><p>Under Romney?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 12:11:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274647#post274647</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274647#post274647</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I mean, a trade-off compared to what? What was the actual alternative on offer?</q></p><p>The possibility that the trajectory around whistleblower persecution would alter?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 12:04:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274646#post274646</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274646#post274646</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Although … I’m not sure that a future where elections are forgone conclusions is actually all that healthy either.</q></p><p>It wasn't a foregone conclusion. If there are 9 elections where someone is a 92% to win, there's a greater than 50% chance at least one of those elections will see…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 12:02:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274645#post274645</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274645#post274645</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Interesting to have not seen or heard any mention of the passing of Amendment 64 (legalising marijuana in Colorado) in our local news feeds. It’s quite a big deal I would have thought.</q></p><p>It's going to be fascinating to watch. Obama was far more liberal on marijuana reform as a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 11:35:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274644#post274644</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274644#post274644</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>How do you justify spending hours of TV time on a subject that is a forgone conclusion … pretend it isn’t forgone.</q></p><p>Although ... I'm not sure that a future where elections are forgone conclusions is actually all that healthy either.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 11:33:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael Savidge</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274642#post274642</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274642#post274642</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Interesting to have not seen or heard any mention of the passing of Amendment 64 (legalising marijuana in Colorado) in our local news feeds. It's quite a big deal I would have thought.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 11:31:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274641#post274641</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274641#post274641</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Ah …. xkcd.</q></p><p>How do you justify spending hours of TV time on a subject that is a forgone conclusion ... pretend it isn't forgone.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 11:24:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274640#post274640</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274640#post274640</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I know it’s not needed for a result, but when can we expect a final tally from Florida?</q></p><p>I don't think they're allowed to start counting special votes until 10 days after the election (ie, people have 10 days for the special votes to get to Florida, after that they…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 11:24:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274639#post274639</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274639#post274639</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Sofie I appreciate Obama’s qualified achievements on a number of issues, but on foreign policy he appears every bit as beholden to vested interests as most hard-line Republicans. I can’t accept that advances in health care, gay marriage, tax equitability or drug law reform are acceptable tradeoffs for a perpetual…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 11:16:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Grant McDougall</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274637#post274637</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274637#post274637</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I'm certain I saw someone in the Obama crowd last night wearing a t-shirt saying "99 Problems, but a Mitt ain't one". </p><p>The music geeks here will get it...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 10:58:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274636#post274636</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274636#post274636</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						lol
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 10:43:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Doyle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274635#post274635</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274635#post274635</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I know it's not needed for a result, but when can we expect a final tally from Florida?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 10:42:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274634#post274634</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274634#post274634</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Is that considered a riot or just a party, in Mississippi?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 10:35:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274633#post274633</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274633#post274633</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Pick of the bunch:“The fact that there is a concession speech, not widespread violence</q></p><p>[1] Except in Mississippi (Univesity of Mississippi students had a little riot of a few hundred students that burned Obama signs and yelled "racial slurs")</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 10:32:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274631#post274631</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274631#post274631</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Pick of the bunch:</q></p><p>I thought this illustrated the political depth of knowledge nicely:<br /><q>Kristen Neel<br />I'm moving to Australia, because their president is a Christian and actually supports what he says.</q><br />Mind you, I have heard some stunning bits of ignorance from our own members of Parliament, far worse…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 10:21:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274630#post274630</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274630#post274630</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://www.alternet.org/election-2012/puppets-pissed-romney-threatening-kill-big-bird-march-washington?akid=9656.1085532.CVz9k9&amp;rd=1&amp;src=newsletter740706&amp;t=7" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Big Bird lives!</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 10:15:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274629#post274629</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274629#post274629</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>From <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/11/07/twitter-us-election-funny-republican-tweets_n_2087229.html?utm_hp_ref=fb&amp;src=sp&amp;comm_ref=false#slide=1730509" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Huffington Post</a> The Funniest Angry Republican Twitter Responses To Barack Obama's Victory</p><p>Pick of the bunch:</p><p><q>"The fact that there is a concession speech, not widespread violence, happening now is a testament to America's greatness. #forloveofcountry"</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:57:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274627#post274627</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274627#post274627</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/11/07/twitter-us-election-funny-republican-tweets_n_2087229.html?utm_hp_ref=fb&amp;src=sp&amp;comm_ref=false#slide=1730509" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/11/07/twitter-us-election-funny-republican-tweets_n_2087229.html?utm_hp_ref=fb&amp;src=sp&amp;comm_ref=false#slide=1730509</a></p><p>Pick of the bunch:</p><p><q>"The fact that there is a concession speech, not widespread violence, happening now is a testament to America's greatness. #forloveofcountry"</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:56:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274626#post274626</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274626#post274626</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The "real" Romney will emerge &ndash; compassionate, moderate, practical and data-driven, as in Massachusetts &ndash; the day after he is elected.</q></p><p>This, and the whole 'we don't really know who Romney is' thing bugs the shit out of me. He has a record. While he was governor of Massachusetts, same-sex…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:56:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274625#post274625</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274625#post274625</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I do worry, given the fact it’s essentially going to be electoral status quo ( solidly Democrat Senate, solidly Republican Congress, Democrat president) that the US is going to be locked in four more years of GOP legislative brinkmanship and filibustering. But that’s for another debate.</q></p><p>That's going to be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:41:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274624#post274624</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274624#post274624</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So, may not be much in the grand scheme of world peace but everyone should start somewhere. I give Obama that. it's a big thing over there.</q><br />Sofie I appreciate Obama's qualified achievements on a number of issues, but on foreign policy he appears every bit as beholden to vested…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:38:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274622#post274622</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274622#post274622</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						My expectations did drop, but I think that was because they were unrealistic in the first place. He has accomplished things that were important, mostly domestic. US foreign policy stance is a huge one to tackle, it has plans that span decades. To even halt certain kinds of insanity, like…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:24:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274621#post274621</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274621#post274621</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Now the world appears pathetically grateful that he’s not Romney,</q></p><p>Healthcare was a big thing for my family. Whilst  many could afford private insurance, many (yes yes there are a lot of Mexicans who are allowed to stay legally)   found such things like smaller injuries (breaking ones arm) prohibitive. What…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:15:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274620#post274620</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274620#post274620</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Ike had trouble from the right at the time. The only reason he didn't get more was his unassailable past as the USA's leading WW2 general.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:12:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274619#post274619</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274619#post274619</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Obama, master of lowered expectations.</q></p><p>the difference this time is that Obama isn't promising anything that would need congress to cooperated with him.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 08:32:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274618#post274618</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274618#post274618</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>now if the US can just get Obama to spend waaaay less on wars of all kinds, they may even have a future worth heading towards....</q><br />This is the guy who promised to close Gitmo, back when he did Hope and Change and Yes We Can. Now the world appears…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 07:30:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274617#post274617</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274617#post274617</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Romney Border cross...</strong><br /><q>but his concession speech made me wonder if I had the measure of the man. </q><br />I suspect it was tinged by a little relief, he was never gonna do a good job as president &ndash; now if the US can just get Obama to spend waaaay less…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 06:57:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>jb</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274616#post274616</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274616#post274616</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Was in New England for a week around the time of the 2nd debate, being swamped by political ads with varying degrees of truthfulness. Some Brown:Warren ads went along the predictable he said-she said lines, but the majority of Warren's were attacking Brown's purported anti-feminine agenda, with Brown's wife coming…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 03:07:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274615#post274615</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274615#post274615</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Charle Krauthammer was already beginning the repudiation of Romney – as a closet liberal – on Fox News tonight. They want to convince themselves that he only lost because he wasn’t extreme enough.</q></p><p>Andrew Sullivan's brutal fisking of David Frum's *cough* odd endorsement of Romney is still <a href="http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2012/11/case-romney.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">worth quoting</a>, because…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:24:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274614#post274614</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274614#post274614</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Ah …. <a href="http://xkcd.com/1131/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">xkcd</a>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:47:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274613#post274613</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274613#post274613</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>I have loathed Mitt Romney all the way through, but his concession speech made me wonder if I had the measure of the man. It was extraordinarily heartfelt, and gracious with no trace of malice. I was impressed by him, which is confusing given the campaign awfulnesses. Was the campaign…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:44:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Littlewood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274612#post274612</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274612#post274612</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q> If you read The Economist regularly enough to take its fundamentally classical liberal editorial pulse, it’s hardly surprising that it has a lot of issues with the Obama Administration’s economic and trade policies. And even on “social issues” it’s often more to the left than Obama is. Don’t forget The…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:34:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274611#post274611</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274611#post274611</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I’m not pretending Reagan was a closet liberal, but you really think the Tea Baggers or the theo-cons would have let him out of New Hampshire alive with a record like that?</q><br />Someone who has occasionally dropped by these parts to parrot Tea Party talking points was selectively quoting Eisenhower's…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:28:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jeremy Eade</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274610#post274610</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274610#post274610</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yes, that house needs to pass the jobs bill fast or its fireworks.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:27:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274609#post274609</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274609#post274609</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Keep me posted if you can find a bigger sore loser than Donald Trump. </q></p><p>There are people out there currently making Trump look reasoned and dignified.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:26:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274608#post274608</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274608#post274608</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> It’s an interesting piece, touching upon some of the concerns you raise above, while their US correspondent covers it in more detail here.</q></p><p>If you read <em>The Economist</em> regularly enough to take its fundamentally classical liberal editorial pulse, it’s hardly surprising that it has a lot of issues with the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:17:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jeremy Eade</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274607#post274607</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274607#post274607</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Democracy swaps voters every election.Younger for older.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:59:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274606#post274606</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274606#post274606</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>for Democrats to assume African-Americans and Hispanics are theirs,</q></p><p>Well, recognition will go rewarded every time if you've been waiting patiently for like y'know <em> foreva</em> . The Dems can definitely work on getting their allegiance. I reckon</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:57:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Littlewood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274605#post274605</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274605#post274605</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q><br />And there's a bigger picture problem here for the GOP. As I've often said, Richard Nixon and the Ronald Reagan who actually served as Governor of California would be ideologically unacceptable to the current debased Tea Bagger/theo-con Republican Party. And don't even delude yourself that Eisenhower or Teddy Roosevelt would…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:56:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Yamis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274604#post274604</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274604#post274604</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Who knows, but I don't think it would be a particularly smart long game for Democrats to assume African-Americans and Hispanics are theirs, electorally speaking.</q></p><p>Nope, it never is in politics.</p><p>I did see (others did too I'm sure) some discussion about how the young vote (18-29)is heavily in favour…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:47:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274603#post274603</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274603#post274603</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>As distinct from the President version, who could never have had a Watergate because nothing so important ever landed on his desk?</q></p><p>No, I mean the man who was president of a union.  One of whose first acts as Governor was to sign into law bills that liberalized access to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:45:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274602#post274602</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274602#post274602</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What’s going to happen in the next 4-8 years etc when the percentage of white population/voters drops further and the minorities vote increases?</q></p><p>Who knows, but I don't think it would be a particularly smart long game for Democrats to assume African-Americans and Hispanics are <em>theirs</em>, electorally speaking.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:39:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274601#post274601</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274601#post274601</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Keep me posted if you can find a bigger sore loser than Donald Trump</q> </p><p>What a truly STUPID shithead is like eh?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:36:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Littlewood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274600#post274600</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274600#post274600</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Web<br />What’s going to happen in the next 4-8 years etc when the percentage of white population/voters drops further and the minorities vote increases? Republicans have got some serious decisions to make if they want to get their fair share of bums on the big seat in the oval office.</q>…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:36:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274599#post274599</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274599#post274599</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the Ronald Reagan who actually served as Governor of California</q><br />As distinct from the President version, who could never have had a Watergate because nothing so important ever landed on his desk?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:35:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Littlewood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274598#post274598</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-big-2012-us-election-pas-thread/?p=274598#post274598</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It was extraordinary. There were a number of familiar motifs in there, but it seemed born of conviction. The climactic message of diversity and inclusion – with its historic shout-out to disabled citizens – was powerful and moving. I cried at that point.</q></p><p>What's so remarkable about Obama's speech is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:34:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
