<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Hard News: Shooting for the Moon</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51435#post51435</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51435#post51435</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'm similarly impressed with the thoroughness of operational separation, the whistleblower provisions, etc. But Chorus does share various systems with the rest of the business &mdash; I gather that it cost BT quite a lot to duplicate those systems when it was structurally separated.</p></blockquote><p>The precise example being Yellow Pages…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 13:22:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51432#post51432</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51432#post51432</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It would seem that given the degree of separation that has taken place that a purchase of Chorus would be a perfectly straightforward exercise.</p></blockquote><p>I'm similarly impressed with the thoroughness of operational separation, the whistleblower provisions, etc. But Chorus does share various systems with the rest of the business --…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 13:08:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Smart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51431#post51431</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51431#post51431</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I went last night to listen to Mark Ratcliffe the CEO for Chorus.  He was quite interesting and discussed the cabinetisation and the speeds possible with copper.  He was asked lots of questions from the floor about the risk of preferred treatment for Telecom subsidiaries which he answered quite well.…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 13:04:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51420#post51420</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51420#post51420</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Oh, and PS:</p><blockquote><p>and that the government doesn't subsidise a competitor</p></blockquote><p>I specifically posited it being spun off and run as an SOE. Why would the Government subsidise a competitor to itself?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 12:11:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51405#post51405</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51405#post51405</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Assuming that it gets enhanced with FTTC or whatever else works commercially, and that the government doesn't subsidise a competitor, then low-medium risk.</p></blockquote><p>So why do you say that creating an open-access fibre network that Telecom can access but not control is high risk? I don't understand that logic, I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 11:54:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51347#post51347</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51347#post51347</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Rich, the Government wouldn't pay all that much for the copper though. It's demonstrably run-down, hasn't been cared for, and was flogged off at a seriously discounted rate. Why reward a company that hasn't maintained the asset?</p></blockquote><p>if you took it to a scrap metal place you could get a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 01:58:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Ashby</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51337#post51337</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51337#post51337</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yup, we have a mountain gum in Eastern Dundee, on the hill above the beach. It's as tall as the lamposts now. I can't claim credit for putting it in, but I did stake it hard to stop it pushing over the front wall and I prune it too.</p><p>Doesn't…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 00:35:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51331#post51331</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51331#post51331</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Rich, the Government wouldn't pay all that much for the copper though. It's demonstrably run-down, hasn't been cared for, and was flogged off at a seriously discounted rate. Why reward a company that hasn't maintained the asset?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 21:41:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51330#post51330</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51330#post51330</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>under the gum tree</p></blockquote><p>You have gum trees in Dundee?</p><blockquote><p>Would you consider Telecom's existing network to be low-risk if it was entirely expropriated and turned into an SOE?</p></blockquote><p>Depends. Assuming that it gets enhanced with FTTC or whatever else works commercially, and that the government doesn't subsidise a competitor,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 21:07:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Ashby</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51325#post51325</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51325#post51325</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						As for how to roll out such a system, the cable cos here in the UK run their fibre along the footpaths, so two lengths per street, but no street closures. It sits in the street under little cast iron cover until I ring them up and request an installation…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 19:32:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Ashby</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51324#post51324</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51324#post51324</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Back in the old days of NZR when they electrified the NI main trunk (1980 to 88) they put in a fibre optic pipe all along beside the line while they were doing it. The signals run off it for one thing but was the first fibre backbone in NZ.…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 19:27:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51315#post51315</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51315#post51315</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I know that wireless sucks the life out of Mtu's but some bright spark will come up with somthing like header comperssion with dynamic error correction and the whole need for cable and fibre will be history.</p></blockquote><p>It's not just MTUs, though that's part of it. It's also latency, and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 18:14:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51314#post51314</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51314#post51314</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>My point is really that any new technology deployment has a lot of risk.</p></blockquote><p>Fibre's not a new technology, though. Not even vaguely close. People have been putting bits and bytes over skinny lengths of glass for longer than I've been alive. It's not a dying standard, unlike CDMA, and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 18:00:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51284#post51284</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51284#post51284</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Matthew, <br />I grudgingly agree with you about wiMax, I wish i didn't. I know that wireless sucks the life out of Mtu's but some bright spark will come up with somthing like header comperssion with dynamic error correction and the whole need for cable and fibre will be history. Then…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 15:55:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51282#post51282</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51282#post51282</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Well, with both Iridium and CDMA supposedly intelligent people with access to all the best advice made a bum decision.</p><p>I think the problem with Iridium in the early 90's, when the decison was made to build it, wasn't the technical problems that Russell rightly highlights. It was more that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 15:54:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51273#post51273</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51273#post51273</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Neither Iridium nor Telecoms CDMA could really be called networks. Rather protocols and associated hardware.</p></blockquote><p>That's a good point. It's like saying that ethernet is a network. I hadn't thought of it like that, but you're right.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 15:16:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51271#post51271</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51271#post51271</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Rich, they're hardly comparable. Iridium's network wasn't exactly something that could be rolled out in usable sections, was it? As for CDMA, Telecom made a stupid decision to go with a technology that was known to be on the way out. The decision had to have been made at least…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 15:13:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51254#post51254</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51254#post51254</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>it's much cheaper to host your New Zealand website outside New Zealand.</p></blockquote><p>AAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHG!!!!<br /> Even teh internets are leaving New Zealand<br />But I still won't vote for Shon Key ;-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 14:17:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51251#post51251</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51251#post51251</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Matthew: If networks are always low risk, what about Iridium, or Telecom's CDMA white elephant. Both of those work fine, but failed to meet business expectations.</p></blockquote><p>Iridium has <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iridium_%28satellite%29" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">so much wrong with it</a>, including horrifying compression, 10 <em>kilobit</em> data transmission rates, call rates of up to $US14 a minute and,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 14:11:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51248#post51248</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51248#post51248</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I also wonder why it appears that PA is hosted in San Francisco, is it?</p></blockquote><p>It is, along with a number of other sites built and hosted by CactusLab.</p><p>There's a simple reason for it: it's much cheaper (and <em>simpler</em>) to host your New Zealand website outside New Zealand.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 14:07:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51245#post51245</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51245#post51245</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Neither Iridium nor Telecoms CDMA could really be called networks. Rather protocols and associated hardware. Or am I just being picky ;-)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 13:54:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51238#post51238</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51238#post51238</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Matthew: If networks are always low risk, what about Iridium, or Telecom's CDMA white elephant. Both of those work fine, but failed to meet business expectations.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 13:35:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51237#post51237</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51237#post51237</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Matthew,<br />Yes, the anti peering nonsense indeed. I had someone try to explain the reasoning to me once, all I could say was WHAT? It came down to either I was stupid or they were, you can guess what my analysis of that was. I also wonder why it appears…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 13:32:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51233#post51233</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51233#post51233</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Steve, it's not just international pipes that lead to capping, it's the anti-peering nonsense. While traffic destined for domestic servers has to trombone through the US or West Island we're going to be stuck with restrictions on how we use the 'net.<br />A huge bitch I have right now is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 13:08:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>slarty</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51229#post51229</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51229#post51229</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote> More likely it's the fact that my flat is on Go Large, and we're thus competing with the remaining people on the plan for what is, I'm sure, a shrinking pool of bandwidth. The ComCom case against TCNZ over Go Large will be interesting, when it finally gets to court…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 13:00:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51226#post51226</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51226#post51226</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'd be happy to pay up to $100/month which is about what I pay now for phone line and internet, as long as the connection could take care of my phone as well.</p></blockquote><p>That's the kind of responses I'm getting too but we're going to need bigger international pipes to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 12:40:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51221#post51221</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51221#post51221</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>So my next question is: what price would you pay for 50/20Mbit/s service? With, say 100GB of data.</p></blockquote><p>As someone else has noted, that data cap would start to become a problem. Currently I have a 20 GB data cap for low quality video. Once the speed goes up to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 12:21:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51213#post51213</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51213#post51213</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It's probably not the last mile or the pacific wholesale that's stuffing up your video, but the contention within the NZ backbone</p></blockquote><p>More likely it's the fact that my flat is on Go Large, and we're thus competing with the remaining people on the plan for what is, I'm sure,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 11:53:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51208#post51208</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51208#post51208</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Is wireless going to be able to keep scaling? Will the actual throughput rates (as opposed to the theoretical maximums) keep pace with demand for capacity by end users? Can the standards actually be agreed upon and available in consumer equipment in time for them to be of use? The…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 11:47:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51201#post51201</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51201#post51201</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Network infrastructure isn't something that should generate spectacular returns. It's meant to be a safe investment, not an especially profitable one.</p></blockquote><p>That implies low risk. Installing a fibre network when you have no idea on takeup and acceptable pricing isn't low risk, in my book.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 11:32:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>slarty</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51199#post51199</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51199#post51199</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yeah, take your point about YouTube &ndash; the way you get this stuff to work is control both ends of the pipe... so your video distribution box is in a cabinet at the end of the street. Sounds pricey but may actually be cheaper than getting good quality copper /…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 11:30:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51196#post51196</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51196#post51196</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Rather, how about setting requirements for a 5 year and 10 year schedule, e.g:</p><p>5yr: 75% with 20Mbit, 95% with 2M, everyone (including rural) with 512k<br />10yr: 75% with 100M, 95% with 20M, everyone with 2M</p></blockquote><p>Been done. I haven't got time to go looking now, but from memory, it's…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 11:27:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51194#post51194</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51194#post51194</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I don't think that the NZ government should be making the technical call on what to use.</p><p>Rather, how about setting requirements for a 5 year and 10 year schedule, e.g:</p><p>5yr: 75% with 20Mbit, 95% with 2M, everyone (including rural) with 512k<br />10yr: 75% with 100M, 95% with 20M,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 11:25:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51187#post51187</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51187#post51187</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'd love for Wimax to come along and solve all our problems but is that still going to happen?</p></blockquote><p>I've just checked my facts regarding WiMax and Woosh's roll out date. I now have it on good authority that the roll out is set for late 2009. As far as…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 11:02:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51171#post51171</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51171#post51171</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>slarty, I can barely watch YouTube as a straight stream at home now, and that's stupidly low-quality video. I end up buffering the entire clip before I start playing anything. We can't even do shit video reliably at the moment, over 2Mbps DSL.</p><p>On the existing "ducts" thing, anyone know…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 10:12:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>slarty</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51170#post51170</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51170#post51170</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Captain Anal here...</p><p>&ndash; Amsterdam has a wonderful ducting system in place: they're called canals :)</p><p>&ndash; Careful with the "Mbps" (millions of bits) "MB" (millions of bytes &ndash; a factor of 8 larger...) <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mbit/s#megabit_per_second" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mbit/s#megabit_per_second</a> </p><p>&ndash; Streaming HDTV needs 28 Mbps to eliminate all artifacts BUT (as Motorola discovered when…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 10:03:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51167#post51167</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51167#post51167</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Tom: it'll be a good test of National's resolve to make the process work, then, won't it?</p><p>Ben: wireless will never beat cable, unless someone finds a way to make it a non-shared medium and deals with several other fundamental issues. Check out the actual throughput figures for wireless vs…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 09:22:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51166#post51166</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51166#post51166</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Russell said:</p><blockquote><p>I understand Vodafone's annoyance at the sudden movement of the goalposts that is the cabinetisation project.</p></blockquote><p>It's not even very sudden. At the time that TCNZ announced it and everyone started whinging about how it was "shifting the goalposts", commentators such as Juha were pointing out that cabinetisation…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 09:16:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ben Austin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51165#post51165</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51165#post51165</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'd love for Wimax to come along and solve all our problems but is that still going to happen? I remember a couple of dire articles a few months back <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/24/former-australian-wimax-operator-wimax-may-not-work/ " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> like this</a> that had me rather worried. Still not sure if that is angst or an actual problem.…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 09:02:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51163#post51163</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51163#post51163</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Clearly, some people haven't got a clue about what it costs to put in underground cable everywhere. By the time you get planning permission from fractionated regional authorities and have dealt with the unexpected and unmapped sewer/electricity main/geological formations/legal challenges/Maori claiments looking to clip the ticket etc etc etc you've…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 08:39:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Che Tibby</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51161#post51161</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51161#post51161</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Here in the UK the deal is UNLIMITED broadband</p></blockquote><p>i think peter is thinking the old ihug model.</p><p>and i say, why not?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 07:13:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Ashby</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51159#post51159</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51159#post51159</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Jeez you people are too conditioned by the borked marketplace you inhabit. Here in the UK the deal is UNLIMITED broadband, if that is not your offer you are not in the fixed line marketplace but a subset of the mobile one. Sure we get 'traffic shaped' if we restrict…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 05:19:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>tussock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51158#post51158</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51158#post51158</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Please, people pricing bandwidth, regarding the data "caps", make the payments a proper small amount of 0.xx cents/MB or whatever. I know tricking people into using more than they'd expected and then paying more for what they don't use is your revenue model, what with you all being phone companies…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 04:16:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51157#post51157</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51157#post51157</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Matthew, that's the figure that was touted in today's talk. The claim was Telstra expect these huge profits to compensate for the inevitable loss of monopoly in the copper infrastructure.</p><p>Telstra are very powerful player here. If the election had gone the other way I have no doubt they would…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 02:39:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51148#post51148</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51148#post51148</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						We are already seeing fibre to the node being rolled out by TCNZ and by the time anyone gets around to running FTTH we could have <a href="http://wimaxnetnews.com/archives/2007/02/gigabit_wimax.html " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> Gigabit WiMax</a> so why arn't we looking at WiMax from the cabinet. I wonder sometimes why people listen to politcians promises in…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 23:30:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51146#post51146</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51146#post51146</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>If it turns out to be a bunch of crap, then fuck 'em</p></blockquote><p>The peering announcement makes it appear that they're at least trying. But it's still stupidly difficult for my inner cynic not to look at the "we expect roughly equal bi-directional traffic flows, but we're only going to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 23:06:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51145#post51145</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51145#post51145</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>18% after tax</strong>?! Find out what they're smoking, and smuggle several container loads back here. You'll make a killing!<br />Most telco's would desperately love to be making 18% gross ROA on their networks, never mind 18% net. That's Peter Pan shit.</p><p>As for the timeframes, they are in part dictated…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 23:00:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51144#post51144</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51144#post51144</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Think Telecom is bad, they are still in nappies compared to the badness of Telstra.</p></blockquote><p>I  think we have to get used to assuming, at least by default, that Telecom is <em>not</em> bad. Because the whole purpose of the separation undertakings is that Telecom won't be bad any more. There…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 22:55:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51143#post51143</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51143#post51143</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Ok, I am in Sydney at CeBIT. Interesting lunch-time talk from the CEO of G9 about Australia's RFP for the $4.5 billion fibre role out (that's the Government component).</p><p>Two points.</p><p>1. This is happening in Australia, and it going to happen fast</p><p>2. There is a huge issue between…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 22:28:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51142#post51142</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51142#post51142</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Fibre will be coming here at the same rate as everywhere else, if not faster. We're three times the city Wellington is :P
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 22:24:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Yamis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51141#post51141</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51141#post51141</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks for your concern AS.</p><p>We paid to bury our powerlines and we can pay to bury these too.</p><p>Powerpoles are like so last century.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 22:17:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>A S</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51140#post51140</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51140#post51140</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Then all I can say is, thank god that Welly and its outer burbs aren't hamstrung like akld.  </p><p>Sounds like the odds of ever getting decent fibre up there is somewhere between zero and none. Sad really.  But on the upside, as I said earlier, roll out the fibre to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 22:09:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51139#post51139</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51139#post51139</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						AS: much of Auckland, and by that I mean Greater Auckland, doesn't have overhead wires. In a lot of places we don't even have anything except lamp posts. Yes, people would say no to having them back again. They're thicker than phone lines, for a start, and people like the…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 21:57:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>A S</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51136#post51136</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51136#post51136</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>So, if it came down to it, would you say no to 100mb FTTH (for arguments sake), if you had to have a few poles down the street?  </p><p>I'd say bring on the poles.</p><p>A pole with a couple of wires on it would not be especially important overall surely?…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 21:31:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Yamis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51134#post51134</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51134#post51134</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Oh yeah, and this goes on in Korea too...</p><p><a href="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/53/193930371_6e215b8c14.jpg?v=0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://farm1.static.flickr.com/53/193930371_6e215b8c14.jpg?v=0</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 21:19:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Yamis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51133#post51133</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51133#post51133</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Seoul is damn near 'hollow' underground.</p><p>There's about 400 subway stations plus there's the tunnels running between them, not to mention the hundreds and hundreds of underpasses, underground arcades, building basements etc.  </p><p>In terms of terrain, it is surrounded by rocky mountains but the built environment is reasonably flat, sitting…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 21:15:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Brislen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51132#post51132</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51132#post51132</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>@Poolester</p><p>Not implying you're young. Why just this week I've been called middle aged. Harumph. Just that I too remember the Dark Days.</p><p>But don't lose hope &ndash; the head of Chorus doesn't have the final say on the matter. That's why it's important we don't undo all the LLU…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 20:44:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Brislen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51130#post51130</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51130#post51130</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Ah, the complete company split approach. Years ago I interviewed an interesting fellow from the Gallagher Group called John Third who advocated just that: network company would earn low rates of return but sure and steady... retail would be freed from the cost of supporting the network company for its…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 20:41:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51129#post51129</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51129#post51129</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Heh, you're a spring chicken.</p></blockquote><p>Not in the least. I've been around for the majority of the time the internet has been commercially available in this country. I was just illustrating how recently it was that we were getting shafted on even basic speeds, never mind real broadband.</p><p>The OECD…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 20:29:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51128#post51128</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51128#post51128</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Briso said:</p><blockquote><p>The idea behind the Institute FibreCo model, and the National Party's fibre build, is that there will be a greater return on investment (As I understand it &ndash; someone tell me if I'm wrong) than is currently the case. I just don't see that happening.</p></blockquote><p>Network infrastructure isn't…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 20:26:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Brislen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51127#post51127</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51127#post51127</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Heh, you're a spring chicken. I got my first full rate ADSL connection from Telecom back in the day (2000) and it came with a whopping 600MB of data A MONTH!</p><p>One month I foolishly downloaded a Windows update for both PC AND work laptop. Boy, the editor was ropable…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 20:25:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Ashby</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51126#post51126</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51126#post51126</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						There is also the small matter of the history of cable in the UK. If it wasn't for the leveraged takeover it would be a dead duck with the companies bankrupt. Before the Virgin branded merger Telewest were just about doing it but NTL was in trouble. They are primarily…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 20:23:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>A S</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51125#post51125</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51125#post51125</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>so I reckon it's going to be at least 60ms</p></blockquote><p>60ms to US servers would be absolutely bloody fantastic. Anything has to be better than what we get now, even on cable, I get anywhere between 160 and 300ms. 60 is what you get to NZ servers a lot of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 20:22:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51124#post51124</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51124#post51124</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						OK. Orcon used to offer max/max ADSL with 100GB data allowance for $200/month. That's no longer available. Their replacement is a "starting rate" of $120/month with 25GB, and that's on their ADSL2+ service. I find it utterly absurd that all we see in this country is faster speeds for higher…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 20:19:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Brislen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51123#post51123</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51123#post51123</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>@Rich, Oh sure it is... but I'm curious what people who seem to actually care about such things would pay.</p><p>The assumption seems to be that customers who receive a faster connection speed will pay more for it. That's not true in my experience, instead they (we) say things like…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 20:18:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kerry Weston</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51122#post51122</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51122#post51122</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>As to how long it would take to lay underground fibre/cost over-runs...I heard a chap on natradio talking about China &ndash; they have built a 32km bridge from Shanghai to an island in just 18 months.</p><p>Where there's a will there's a way and all that. I dunno what it…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 20:16:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51121#post51121</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51121#post51121</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>what price would you pay for...</p></blockquote><p>About $50, same as now. I don't plan to budget any more for internettery.</p><p>But it's not what *I* would pay for the service. It's what an average household would pay &ndash; or, more specifically, the price/adoption curve.</p><p>Taking a small group of early…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 20:08:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Brislen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51120#post51120</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51120#post51120</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>@Matthew &ndash; No, I'm not joking. I don't think there's an ISP in NZ today offers a 100GB plan. I can't see one offering one with that large a cap any time soon.</p><p>I do hear what you're saying &ndash; with a family each member downloading movies, TV, surfing, working…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 20:02:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51119#post51119</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51119#post51119</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'd love 100MB up/down. That way I might finally get a deceny ping to US game servers....</p></blockquote><p>What's the minimal latency from here to the US West Coast? Speed of light is about 3000000km/s, distance point to point is about 11000km, so I reckon it's going to be at least…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 19:43:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51115#post51115</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51115#post51115</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>50/20 with 100GB? You're joking, right? We can get 100GB now with downstream speeds half that and upstream speeds not even in spitting distance.<br />Seriously, caps are the thing that kill us the most. I could probably convince the flatmates to wear $150-175/month for that kind of speed, but 100GB?…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 19:06:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Brislen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51113#post51113</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51113#post51113</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>So the consensus seems to be about the 50Mbit/s down and similar up... which is nice (momentarily puts Vodafone hat on) as we're hopefully introducing a VDSL2+ service this year that will do just that (frisbees hat into the the corner again).</p><p>Several years ago now I met a nice…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 19:00:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51111#post51111</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51111#post51111</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Then Auckland will risk missing out.</p></blockquote><p>Wishful thinking on your part. The figures, from NZI's estimates at least, appear to be based on ducting not overhead.<br />The big advantage of ducted is that errant car drivers, of which NZ has more than a few, don't knock out large swathes of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 18:47:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>A S</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51110#post51110</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51110#post51110</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Ain't going to fly in Auckland. A significant part of the reason that Auckland doesn't have TCL cable is that the Auckland City Council said nay to overhead lines. District plan forbids new ones unless it's absolutely imperative.</p></blockquote><p>Then Auckland will risk missing out.  I'd be quite happy if they…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 18:41:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51109#post51109</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51109#post51109</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I would have thought that stringing fibre from phone poles (of which there are an awful lot around the country) would significantly reduce the cost of rolling out fibre. Telstra clear has cables festooned all over the place in various Wellington burbs, and Citylink in wellington has their little blue…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 18:25:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>A S</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51106#post51106</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51106#post51106</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>@ Paul</p><p>I'd love 100MB up/down.  That way I might finally get a deceny ping to US game servers.... </p><p>I'm on telstra cable now, and frankly, even their cable offerings aren't good enough to game and have one of the other machines on the network surf at the same time.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 18:03:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51104#post51104</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51104#post51104</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>If this network is used to provide HDTV it would be the most expensive way possible to do it and I struggle to see an advantage with broadcast satellite and terrestrial digital TV (freeview) available.</p></blockquote><p>True but as a method of delivering video on demand whether it be movies, lectures…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 17:38:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51103#post51103</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51103#post51103</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Anyway while selling the phone company might have been a stupid thing to do it certainly wasn't a golden age of telecommunication</p></blockquote><p>Nowhere near as stupid as keeping the privatised telco vertically integrated, thereby turning it into the Ma Bell of the South Pacific. At least Ma Bell had the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 17:31:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51102#post51102</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51102#post51102</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But ... once you've acquired Chorus, even at a regulated price, you've spent all the money you were going to spend on fibre, haven't you? I can see any way it adds up, except for Telecom/Chorus to be the dominant shareholder in FibreCo. That'd be a fun negotiation.</p></blockquote><p>To be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 17:27:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51101#post51101</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51101#post51101</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I'm glad you mentioned the Tolls purchase &ndash; can you seriously imagine the Nats doing the same to Telecom? their money people would have a hissy fit</p><p>I do remember when we owned the phone company &ndash; it sucked badly &ndash; really badly &ndash; it was run by people from…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 17:14:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gabor Toth</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51099#post51099</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51099#post51099</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And this is nowhere nere as bad as what I saw on my last trip to Asia...</p></blockquote><p>I know of certain parts of Wellington which don't look that much different (Mt Victoria for instance). Though Wellingtonians are fortunate to have the Telstra Clear cable network, combine it with overhead power…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 16:57:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Smart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51098#post51098</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51098#post51098</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The following  is the most sensible suggestion in my opinion. It makes use of existing investment and provides the best long term return on capital.</p><blockquote><p>1 (preferred):FibreCo pays fair price for the existing fibre and copper access networks to FibreCo<br />FibreCo takes over management of copper and optimises maintenance and…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 16:52:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51097#post51097</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51097#post51097</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Although the TCNZ board may have been eyeing up the well-above-book Toll deal and counting their chickens already.</p></blockquote><p>But ... once you've acquired Chorus, even at a regulated price, you've spent all the money you were going to spend on fibre, haven't you? I can see any way it adds…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 16:47:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51096#post51096</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51096#post51096</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>That would be like selling the roads</p></blockquote><p>The man who looks likely to be the IT Minister in a year's time wanted to do exactly that! His road-to-Damascus conversion, as quoted in the same Herald article that talks of Ratcliffe's short-sighted notions, is rather hard to swallow when one considers…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 16:33:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nick D&#039;Angelo</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51094#post51094</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51094#post51094</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>How about this?</p></blockquote><p>heh heh &ndash; that's <strong>exactly</strong> what I was thinking of!</p><blockquote><p>TCNZ is a privately-owned company ... &ndash; that makes it difficult to have them easily (and cheapily) give up assets simply because the NZ public would like them in their hands, thankyou very much.</p></blockquote><p>I had to laugh the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 16:17:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51093#post51093</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51093#post51093</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Rich says:</p><blockquote><p>I'm unconvinced on the upgradability of passive networks. If it gets built out with 100G bandwidth say, wouldn't all the users need to upgrade equipment at once for 1G bandwidth?</p></blockquote><p>Sounds right, yes. But when you're starting from a position of nothing, and the marginal cost to go…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 15:46:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51086#post51086</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51086#post51086</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And <a href="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/161/363682302_fdf52d15e5.jpg?v=0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this</a> is nowhere nere as bad as what I saw on my last trip to Asia...</p></blockquote><p>How about <a href="http://pixdaus.com/single.php?id=2663" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this</a>?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 15:08:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51084#post51084</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51084#post51084</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It could be done, but I've had some insight lately into the work that's gone into Telecom's undertakings for operation separation. It's eye-watering.</p></blockquote><p>Well there's certainly benefit in having gone through all that before you get to structural separation &ndash; at least the businesses should be <em>more</em> easily detached from…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 15:07:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51081#post51081</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51081#post51081</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I almost totally agree with Steven on this but would like to add a few points.<br />The data cap question, decoupling the data cap from the speed may make sense for some but not most. Once you start downloading hi def video in real time (streaming) you are going to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 15:05:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51079#post51079</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51079#post51079</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The problem with 1 is surely that TCNZ would price it through the roof given they have a locked-in, deep-pocket buyer? Unless it is "light-regulation" whereby everyone agrees to sell at an independently-judged fair value.</p></blockquote><p>It <em>could</em> be done, but I've had some insight lately into the work that's gone…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 14:58:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51077#post51077</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51077#post51077</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Doing it with Telecom as a willing partner would take 12-18 months and cost a lot. If it ain't willing ...</p></blockquote><p>So the NZInstitute paper on this had three options:<br />1 (preferred): <br />FibreCo pays fair price for the existing fibre and copper networks<br />Telecom (and others) agree to sell its…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 14:45:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51074#post51074</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51074#post51074</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Paul B: a couple of years ago I visited my sister in Long Island, NY, where Verizon (or Vonage? can't remember, started with V) was providing fibre to their house, with a rate of 50Mbps down, 10 up. I did a download to my laptop from a local Debian mirror…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 14:30:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Colin Ross</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51071#post51071</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51071#post51071</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>We need to be vigilant here.<br />Political animals are likely to attempt to string cables in the air &ndash; we have far too many already .<br />We aspire to being a civilised first world society &ndash; so lets ensure that our employees in Wellington do their jobs properly..</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 14:14:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51069#post51069</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51069#post51069</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But most importantly completely separate Chorus from Telecom and "nationalise" it (through public-private investment) into this FibreCo vehicle &ndash; that's a big play for a National Govt.</p></blockquote><p>Yes. I didn't have time to cover that angle this morning, but it would be something akin to a hostile takeover by the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 14:04:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51067#post51067</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51067#post51067</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>To his credit, Williamson has given a much clearer steer as to the nature of the investment vehicle for National's project: it's the New Zealand Institute's FibreCo, by whatever name. Operators large and small would have the ability to take a stake alongside the government in the big company that…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 13:50:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51064#post51064</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51064#post51064</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'm unconvinced on the upgradability of passive networks. If it gets built out with 100G bandwidth say, wouldn't all the users need to upgrade equipment at once for 1G bandwidth?</p></blockquote><p>That's my understanding, yes. It seems to be one of the big drawbacks of passive networks.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 13:15:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51062#post51062</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51062#post51062</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Has realism set in :-)</p><p>We have Telstra fibre at both Auckland and Wellington (fringe CBD) offices. With 1MBit of bandwidth, coz it's uneconomical to go over that. I'd assume they'd connect any kind of premise if one was willing to pay the price, no?</p><p>I'm unconvinced on the upgradability…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 13:07:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51061#post51061</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51061#post51061</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The other thing I'd like would be to get things more 'in one'.</p><p>I don't want a telephone line, a fibre optic cable and a dish on the side of my house.</p><p>I should be able to get all those things through one 'thing', I don't particularly mind which.</p><p>The…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 12:59:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Brislen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51059#post51059</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51059#post51059</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>exactly...  just give it to me now. NOW! </p><p>sorry. It's not like there's anything to watch at the moment (Battlestar Galactica season four? Anybody?)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 12:49:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51058#post51058</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51058#post51058</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Another dimension to the build-for-the-future message can be found in Telstra Clear's residential fibre network in parts of Wellington. I'm told it's really badly engineered, to the point where it's going to become irrelevant before too long. Bummer.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 12:48:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Fish</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51057#post51057</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51057#post51057</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Paul B &ndash; The problem with speed is if you have more you use it for different things. <br />Enough to stream full-screen video would be ideal, but for what I am doing now (web development and heavy web use from home) my download speeds of (sometimes) 3Mbit (on a full-speed…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 12:45:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51056#post51056</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51056#post51056</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>We are in the wop-wops but, we have fibre running right past our gate. Our cabinet is ~5km away and the best speed we get is ~ 1Mb/sec although routinely 300-400kb/sec.</p><p>We would love to get high quality tv/movies, does that require 10Mb/sec?</p><p>At the moment, National don't care whether…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 12:44:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nick D&#039;Angelo</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51055#post51055</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51055#post51055</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						nere?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 12:43:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nick D&#039;Angelo</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51054#post51054</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51054#post51054</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I would suggest that any government look at overhead cables where possible</p></blockquote><p>And <a href="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/161/363682302_fdf52d15e5.jpg?v=0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this</a> is nowhere nere as bad as what I saw on my last trip to Asia...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 12:43:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51053#post51053</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51053#post51053</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Can I just ask the PA crowd what kinds of speeds they think they'd like? I'm curious as to how fast users think they want their connections to go (I hear everything from 10Mbit/s to 1Gbit/s to "I just want it to cost less, I don't care about the speed").</blockquote>…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 12:42:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nat Torkington</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51052#post51052</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51052#post51052</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						@Paul Brislen: I'd be happy with 10Mb today (current speed is 1.5Mb on a good day) but remember, this is an arms race.  Viewing the average news site's web page now takes 500K &ndash; 1M of data (HTML, javascript, images, embedded hooplah, etc.).  If you want your web page to…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 12:41:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51051#post51051</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51051#post51051</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I too want HDTV streaming to my home &ndash; I don't care if that's delivered over satellite TV, terrestrial, wifi, LTE, WiMax, copper, fibre or cable. It can be bean cans on string and I wouldn't care &ndash; I just want the service.</p></blockquote><p>And the point being that you can…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 12:40:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Brislen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51050#post51050</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51050#post51050</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						@Kyle &ndash; not necessarily... upload speeds can be increased dramatically over DSL &ndash; ADSL, the current choice, is asymmetrical. VDSL can be offered symmetrically and VDSL2 is in the ballpark for the speeds on the thread so far (50Mbit/s down, 30Mbit/s up)... but that's dependent on distance from the cabinet/exchange…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 12:35:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rogan Polkinghorne</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51049#post51049</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51049#post51049</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I really like the whole 'idea' behind all this, but at the same time have a nagging feeling that it's going to be something that spends forever being fought over/knocked back, and never actually (even getting close to) happening...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 12:28:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51048#post51048</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51048#post51048</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Can I just ask the PA crowd what kinds of speeds they think they'd like? I'm curious as to how fast users think they want their connections to go (I hear everything from 10Mbit/s to 1Gbit/s to "I just want it to cost less, I don't care about the speed").</blockquote>…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 12:24:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51047#post51047</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51047#post51047</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>rb, sounds like all this digging will be taking place in the suburbs.</p><p>any word on whether they'll also be stringing residental apartments?</p></blockquote><p>I think there's an obvious case for connecting hi-density urban residential areas first: you get more residents for your dollar.</p><p>We're just going to have to live…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 12:23:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Che Tibby</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51046#post51046</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51046#post51046</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						@paul b.  as long as it costs less and has <em>comparable</em> speeds to overseas cities, i'll be a pig in mud.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 12:20:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51044#post51044</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51044#post51044</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>OK &ndash; I work in the TV end of this biz &ndash; we make settops both for IP and traditional cable plants in the US &ndash; read the following with my bias .....</p><p>I think that the killer app here ought to be TV &ndash; a competing service to Sky…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 12:14:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51042#post51042</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51042#post51042</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Amsterdam is flat and I would guess built on fairly soft mud or sand. I dunno about Seoul. Ask yourself the cost of digging through clay or volcanic rock in Auckland, and doing that up hills and down dales.  Putting it all underground will be far to expensive. Period.</p><p>I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 12:13:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Brislen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51041#post51041</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51041#post51041</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Can I just ask the PA crowd what kinds of speeds they think they'd like? I'm curious as to how fast users think they want their connections to go (I hear everything from 10Mbit/s to 1Gbit/s to "I just want it to cost less, I don't care about the speed").…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 12:12:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Che Tibby</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51040#post51040</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51040#post51040</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>rb, sounds like all this digging will be taking place in the suburbs.</p><p>any word on whether they'll also be stringing residental apartments?</p><p>lots of people with disposable income there, and the big players won't give us fibre...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 12:09:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51039#post51039</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shooting-for-the-moon/?p=51039#post51039</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 12:09:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
