<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Hard News: Shonky scepticism</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>81stcolumn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10592#post10592</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10592#post10592</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>As a bookend, the following articles recently appeared in New Scientist:</p><p><a href="http://environment.newscientist.com/article/dn11417?DCMP=ILC-Top5&amp;nsref=dn11417" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">US fudging of climate science &ndash; details revealed</a></p><p><a href="http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/mg19325955.900-fake-fights-are-not-helping-climate-science.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Fake fights are not helping climate science</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 23:50:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10454#post10454</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10454#post10454</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>James, a partial answer is to have <a href="http://www.opendoar.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Open Access Repositories</a> so there are reputable sources on the Internet for academic research and publication.</p><p><a href="http://www.oarinz.ac.nz/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">|OARiNZ</a> is the NZ version based on open source systems and being customised here.</p><p>Disclaimer/plug alert &ndash; our company is involved in the customisation work.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 20:55:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Green</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10452#post10452</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10452#post10452</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I think the other strategy to influence impact factors is pre-publication. Some journals are now putting accepted manuscripts (pre-proof stage) on the web. This means that people effectively can read and cite them before the impact factor's 2 year window starts.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 19:15:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>81stcolumn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10451#post10451</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10451#post10451</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Bart:</p><p>By all means, let’s agree to disagree on our faith in the review process…</p><p>Russell:</p><p>The reporting thing is bang on.  It is strange to see pseudo-balanced reporting of what in some cases is quite an unbalanced process.  The uncertainty it creates is perplexing to say the least.</p><p>But…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:24:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Riddley Walker</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10450#post10450</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10450#post10450</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						i just can't seem to help being inflammatory
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:06:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Che Tibby</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10449#post10449</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10449#post10449</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>thereby aggravating the ire of political 'scientists' world-wide.</p><p>it's a blinking conspiracy by the economists...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:56:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Riddley Walker</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10445#post10445</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10445#post10445</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						i didn't think they handed out nobels for political studies?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:18:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Che Tibby</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10444#post10444</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10444#post10444</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Although I suspect that economists believe they are practicing a science &ndash; they even get a nobel for it!</p></blockquote><p>and the nobel prize for voodooism masquerading as rationality goes to!! <strike>political science</strike> economics!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:10:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Green</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10439#post10439</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10439#post10439</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Oh. One more great thing... I think there is increasingly a trend for some of the top journals to publish <em>more</em> controversial, provocative, salacious and/or quirky papers than some of the lower ranked journals. That's not to say that they're bad science per se, but that it's important to be…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:55:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10438#post10438</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10438#post10438</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Good question Russell.</p><p>Although I suspect that economists believe they are practicing a science &ndash; they even get a nobel for it!</p><p>cheers<br />Bart</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:54:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10436#post10436</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10436#post10436</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>yeah definitely. as reece said, you gots to start somewhere, and i'd hazard to say a shakey primary reading of a journal article is likely to still be less misinformed than relying on secondary msm readings, which step even further over the boundaries of valid extrapolation and inference than even…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:41:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Riddley Walker</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10435#post10435</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10435#post10435</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>That said, more power to people reading science</em></p><p>yeah definitely. as reece said, you gots to start somewhere, and i'd hazard to say a shakey primary reading of a journal article is likely to <em>still</em> be less misinformed than relying on secondary msm readings, which step even further over the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:09:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Riddley Walker</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10433#post10433</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10433#post10433</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Bart</strong>, i didn't realise your comments pertained specifically to journals. in that case i would generally agree, although papers can be published for all sorts of reasons and sometimes it seems intended for the (expert) reader to make what they will of the data's validity.</p><p>without wanting to labour a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:03:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Green</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10432#post10432</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10432#post10432</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Another pitfall with science articles is the extent to which the data supports the discussion&conclusion. It's not uncommon for papers to gently overstep the strength of their findings. Like where a survey is used to measure behaviour, and then you end up with the survey data being used like it actually…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:59:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10431#post10431</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10431#post10431</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I do not want this to become a flame war so I guess we are just going to disagree on some things. Couple of comments though</p><p>81st asked</p><blockquote><p>Nonetheless I am confused when you say science “is what it is”.</p></blockquote><p>That isn't what I said, I said reading science is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:39:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Riddley Walker</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10427#post10427</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10427#post10427</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>i have to agree with the <strong>81st</strong> on this one. having lay readers examine journal article is great, but assuming the inferences can be made reasonable sense of, there still remains the issue of primary data appraisal.</p><p>without <em>some</em> understanding of methodology (and it doesn't have to be that advanced),…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 10:44:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>81stcolumn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10418#post10418</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10418#post10418</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Reece:</p><blockquote><p>After all, learning has to start somewhere, we're not all born genii.</p></blockquote><p>Nor am I, think sometimes the learning I did came at the expense of valuable skills in social etiquette and diplomacy ;-)</p><p>Bart:</p><blockquote><p>While I agree with much of what you said regarding the influence of prior…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:39:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10398#post10398</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10398#post10398</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And don't forget Singer's links to  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexis_de_Tocqueville_Institution" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Alexis de Tocquville Institution links as well</a>. If you have been following SCO vs IBM at all, you'll know that AdTI is essentially a paid mouthpiece which churns out grossly inaccurate hit pieces on demand. Who pays them? To the extent that they disclose…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:55:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10397#post10397</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10397#post10397</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>From the comments under Goldacre post:</p><blockquote><p>Not the only thing that Durkin misrepresented:</p><p>[IMG]img132.imageshack.us/img132/3378/fredsingerpp9.png[/IMG]</p><p>&ndash; Fred Singer was never the ‘Director of the National Weather Service’.</p><p>The ‘Departments’ that a number of the other sceptic contributors are supposedly affiliated to similarly don’t exist….</p></blockquote><p>He appears  to have been the founding…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:06:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>reece palmer</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10396#post10396</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10396#post10396</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>To suggest that folks shouldn't try because they don't have the years of training needed to understand the methods in details is just the kind of arrogance that I display (and am ashamed of) all too often.</p></blockquote><p>After all, learning has to start somewhere, we're not all born genii.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:05:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>reece palmer</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10395#post10395</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10395#post10395</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						before you go embarassing yourself again, I'm pretty sure then our Mr Judd knows a <strong>lot more</strong> about judaism than just about any of us, so I wouldn't even entertain debating him there.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:00:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10394#post10394</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10394#post10394</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I hadn't realised but <a href="http://www.badscience.net/?cat=75" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ben Goldacre is on top of this one too</a>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:49:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10392#post10392</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10392#post10392</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The 81st column rolled in with this and some other points</p><blockquote><p>In some ways saying that you can understand research without having a grasp of stats and methodology is a bit like suggesting you should just kick the tyres before buying a car. Yep you can do it, but don’t…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:34:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sonic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10388#post10388</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10388#post10388</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>This is fun!</p><p><a href="http://timlambert.org/2005/04/gwsbingo/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://timlambert.org/2005/04/gwsbingo/</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:54:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danyl Mclauchlan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10387#post10387</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10387#post10387</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>"E' means exit and 'meritus' means you bloody deserve it!"</em></p><p>Rupert Murdoch, sacking one of his editors.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:47:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>stever@cs.waikato.ac.nz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10378#post10378</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10378#post10378</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Just a small detail: a retired professor is not the same thing as an emeritus professor. </p><p>A retired professor is someone who was a professor up until the time they retired.</p><p>An emeritus professor is someone who is a retired professor AND their institution thought them so good that the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 08:15:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Green</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10376#post10376</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10376#post10376</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The source Steve forgot to cite:<br /><a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/node/56631" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.theonion.com/content/node/56631</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 22:28:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10375#post10375</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10375#post10375</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Al Gore doesnt have a Secret Service detail. Even  Bill Clinton only gets it till 2010 ( unless Hilary makes it to the White House first)<br /><a href="http://www.secretservice.gov/protection.shtml" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.secretservice.gov/protection.shtml</a><br />And as for a larger than average home, so that makes it all right then. Cant have Al measured  by the same  standard…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 21:08:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10374#post10374</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10374#post10374</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I am well aware of the uncategorisable nature of Judaism, Nonetheless, the people who used the term "Jewish science" believed that Jews were a race. And as I say, they disparaged the ideas because they despised the people who came up with them &mdash; the complete reverse of the situation…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 19:43:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10373#post10373</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10373#post10373</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Getting away from the fact that 'Jewish' isnt a racial group ( and Jews can come from a number of ethnic backgrounds)They were a group of people whos science was ignored since they had the wrong label attached to them.</p><p>The tobacco analogy is interesting in that the sort of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 18:40:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Riddley Walker</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10372#post10372</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10372#post10372</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>this is a great site for those interested, it is an archive of all the RFCs from day 1 of the NWG's initial inception of ARPAnet, to NSFnet right through to the internet.<br />it's like watching the bible getting written by committee from the first page... only perhaps a bit…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 18:30:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nobody Important</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10369#post10369</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10369#post10369</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Hey Steve</p><p>Anytime anyone says Al Gore claims to have invented the internet I always chime in with "show me where'. So good on you for actually posting the link &ndash; the first time I've seen anyone do it.</p><p>But actually in following the link I see all Al Gore…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 18:05:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10368#post10368</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10368#post10368</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						PS: despite what you read above, I am a native English speaker. Apparently my hands type on autopilot. :(
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 17:36:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10367#post10367</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10367#post10367</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>There used to be a time when 'Jewish Science' was discredited by those who looked at who they were rather than what they produced. The same was said about 'Negro music' Lets just give a label to unpopular views,that means what they say doesnt have to be examinedat all</p></blockquote><p>So…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 17:31:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Cox</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10366#post10366</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10366#post10366</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Seems that Wunsch is worried that all his funding will dry up and his papers wont get published</p></blockquote><p>Dude, seriously? Did you even understand what you just posted up there? He's talking about the mass media picking focusing on research with a sense of showing a 'dramatic event' in order…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 17:10:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Grigg</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10365#post10365</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10365#post10365</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Steve,<br />You saying Al Gore said he invented the internet and your quote are rather different things no?</p><p>And <a href="http://www.perkel.com/politics/gore/internet.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">From Vincent Cerf</a></p><blockquote><p>"The Internet would not be where it is in the United States without the strong support given to it and related research areas by the Vice President in…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 16:11:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10364#post10364</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10364#post10364</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Well, I will be offering &mdash; I'll be offering my vision when my campaign begins. And it will be comprehensive and sweeping. And I hope that it will be compelling enough to draw people toward it. I feel that it will be. </p><p>But it will emerge from my dialogue with…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 14:11:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10363#post10363</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10363#post10363</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Al Gore claimed to invented the internet ...</p></blockquote><p>Careful. You run the risk of disqualifying yourself from the argument when you say things like that ...</p><blockquote><p>There used to be a time when 'Jewish Science' was discredited by those who looked at who they were rather than what they produced.…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 13:29:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10360#post10360</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10360#post10360</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Tim Ball <em>is</em> a retired Professor of Geography who has a Phd  from the University of London on a Topic in Climatology.This is a long way from your repeating Richard Graydons baseless acusation that he is not an Emeritus Professor, so is a crank who cant be believed.  The libel…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 11:22:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10358#post10358</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10358#post10358</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Always discredit the person rather than the work thats not very scientific. Richard Graydons hatchet job on Tim Ball hasnt worked either.</p></blockquote><p>Oh tosh. Ball and organisations with which he is affiliated have repeatedly misstated his credentials.     </p><p>The <a href="http://www.desmogblog.com/tim-ball-vs-dan-johnson-lawsuit-documents" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">statements of defence</a> in Ball's libel action against Dr Dan Johnson and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 09:42:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10357#post10357</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10357#post10357</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>Im </em>still waiting for my Big Oil/Coal payments to come through. </p><p>But just in case my total kWh electricity use per year is  about 4500, about 2% of Al Gores McMansion ( so thats where  big Coal gets its profits from)</p><p>AS for Monte Heib, he might know a lot…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 08:50:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>gondwanan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10349#post10349</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10349#post10349</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Great to see that climate change is such a hot <em>(pardon the pun)</em> topic here. </p><p>There's a great breakdown of some of the common climate skeptic arguments at grist:</p><p><a href="http://gristmill.grist.org/skeptics" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">grist.org/skeptics</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 18:10:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10347#post10347</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10347#post10347</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I should have made clear that the whole site appears to be a front for coal industry interests.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 15:56:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10337#post10337</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10337#post10337</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Steve,</p><p>Your "Plant Fossils of West Virgininia" site also contains sentences like this:</p><blockquote><p>Today, at 380 ppm our atmosphere is CO2-impoverished, although environmentalists, certain political groups, and the news media would have us believe otherwise. &ndash; Monte Heib</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.clearlight.com/~mhieb/WVFossils/Carboniferous_climate.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.clearlight.com/~mhieb/WVFossils/Carboniferous_climate.html</a></p><p>And who is Monte Heib? Former chief engineer for the West…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 12:34:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Cox</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10335#post10335</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10335#post10335</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>That's quite eerie. You're not really some guy called Mike who says things like 'I have the body of a Greek god, you know' are you?</p></blockquote><p>Nope. Not Mike unfortunately. As for the body:</p><p>Apollo = not so much.</p><p>Pan(after a few nights of drinking) = definite maybe.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 12:03:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10330#post10330</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10330#post10330</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>'Lets get nasty'  doesnt really work Richard.</p><p>Is Tim Ball claiming to be a 'Professor Emeritus' or is the TV show saying it. CH4 promotional material seems to be the culprit</p><p>Richard Littlemore tries the same nonsense as you in his Desmog blog<br />"In a September 26, 2006 letter to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 10:18:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Grant Dexter</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10325#post10325</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10325#post10325</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Here is the result of the Global Warming campaign on the youth of today. It's destroying their dreams and hope of a future:</p><p><a href="http://img248.imageshack.us/my.php?image=scan010jl5.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Story</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 06:54:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>81stcolumn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10322#post10322</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10322#post10322</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>About science, facts and knowledge.</p><p><br />i) The scientist and the science cannot be separated.  Polanyi’s still influential work points out that the scientists are informed by tacit knowledge which determines the scientific questions they ask, the methods they use and the way in which data is presented.</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Polanyi" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Polanyi</a></p><p>My point…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 03:47:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10321#post10321</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10321#post10321</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I haven't read what Drudge has to say but Mediamatters takes great offence at this from NYT:</p><p>He pointed to hurricanes, an icon for Mr. Gore, who highlights the devastation of Hurricane Katrina and cites research suggesting that global warming will cause both storm frequency and deadliness to rise. Yet…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 01:11:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10311#post10311</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10311#post10311</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I think both Drudge and Mediamatters need to sit down and have a few Marlborough chardonnays.</p><p>Reading the NYTs article it doesn't strike me as being either a slam dunk for the skeptics or a hatchet job on Gore. It's more a look at opinions surrounding Gore's global warming campaign.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:55:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10308#post10308</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10308#post10308</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>NY Times story on Gore sceptics, as trumpeted by Drudge:</p><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/13/science/13gore.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/13/science/13gore.html</a></p><p>Media Matters response:</p><p><a href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200703150012" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703150012</a></p><p>Quite the minefield, this business of working out to whom to pay heed. Disqualifying everyone in the pay of a think-tank seems draconian, but it might clarify things.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:24:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Green</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10304#post10304</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10304#post10304</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I've been rather underwelmed by Lillian Ng's reporting as well. I think much as medical schools are attempting to educate their students to be able to think more critically about research, a good honours student in a science discipline would probably whomp them hands down. The reality is that teaching…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:54:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10301#post10301</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10301#post10301</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>That's quite eerie. You're not really some guy called Mike who says things like 'I have the body of a Greek god, you know' are you?</p><p>He used that line and got lucky?</p><p>Man, I'm totally off track.</p></blockquote><p>Nah, it nearly lost him the whole deal. He was saved by,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:45:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10297#post10297</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10297#post10297</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>You don't have to understand every word and you don't have to read the whole paper to get an idea of the current scientific thinking in a field.</p></blockquote><p>I did basically what you've outlined at the time of the great GE stoush, spent hours in the evenings reading original research,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:34:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10295#post10295</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10295#post10295</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>That's quite eerie. You're not really some guy called Mike who says things like 'I have the body of a Greek god, you know' are you?</p></blockquote><p>He used that line and got lucky?</p><p>Man, I'm totally off track.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:28:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10292#post10292</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10292#post10292</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>hadyn:</p><p>Sorry, I munged your name too &ndash; iz nut that God at the speling an poof-weeding. :)  And I should be because getting someone's name right is a small but significant courtesy.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:23:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hadyn Green</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10291#post10291</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10291#post10291</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Cheers Robyn, I don't know why but I always figured Dr Ng was a GP but I've still seen her report dodgy stats which worries me.</p><p>Cheers Bart, it's no biggie just something it's good to nip in the bud early :)</p><p>Past 4 on a Friday, time to knock…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:18:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10289#post10289</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10289#post10289</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Sorry Hadyn! I should have checked you name.</p><p>As for figuring out who to trust. You know the 7 degrees of separation thing... well it also applies to experts. My guess is you are no more than 3 or 4 people away from someone who really does know the specilaist…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:09:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10258#post10258</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10258#post10258</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>And I got told off in ENGL 320 just for calling Deconstruction 'intellectual wanking'. I still bear a deep, primal loathing for Post-modernism, even though it once got me laid.</blockquote>The way my sister-in-law tells her tertairy history &ndash; I'm not sure what the subject was &ndash; the students ended up…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:24:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10254#post10254</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10254#post10254</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://inthegreen.typepad.com/blog/2007/03/deconstructing_.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://inthegreen.typepad.com/blog/2007/03/deconstructing_.html</a></p><p><br />OK serious swindle debunking here with many links to sciencey stuff</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:01:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Robyn Gallagher</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10252#post10252</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10252#post10252</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I've noticed TV3 started touting one of their reports as DOCTOR Lillian Ng (sp). What is she a doctor of?</p></blockquote><p>Dr Ng is a GP, and currently practises. <a href="http://www.ingenio.auckland.ac.nz/uoa/for/alumni/news/ingenio/archive/a06/alumni/6.cfm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Auckland University's alumni website</a> says she has a Bachelor of Human Biology, a Master of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery, Diploma in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:40:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10250#post10250</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10250#post10250</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Same! Although the story is quite boring. Although I guess if you told it in a fragmented, multi-narrative with unreliable narrators then it might be more interesting :/</p></blockquote><p>That's quite eerie. You're not really some guy called Mike who says things like 'I have the body of a Greek god,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:40:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10249#post10249</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10249#post10249</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Dr. Brash was always an interesting authority.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:33:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hadyn Green</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10242#post10242</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10242#post10242</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Climate change is a politcial issue in that we may vote depending on which party believes the same scientific hypothesis as us or decides on the same course of action as us. But that is a political debate not a scientific one (with due respect to Bart and his excellent…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:07:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Cox</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10241#post10241</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10241#post10241</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And I got told off in ENGL 320 just for calling Deconstruction 'intellectual wanking'. I still bear a deep, primal loathing for Post-modernism, even though it once got me laid.</p></blockquote><p>Same! Although the story is quite boring. Although I guess if you told it in a fragmented, multi-narrative with unreliable…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:01:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10219#post10219</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10219#post10219</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Homer is an authority,</p><blockquote><p>In another episode, the zoologist Stephen Jay Gould is asked to debunk a purported angel fossil. Homer's religious next-door neighbour is outraged. "Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling how it ends," he says. "I say there are some things we don't…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:34:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10218#post10218</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10218#post10218</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>and clutch with our thoughts that primitive tail which flares behind the peacock of the heavens,—the comet.</p></blockquote><p>Well, I think we should...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:26:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10216#post10216</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10216#post10216</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Argument from authority is a shorthand. Authorities may be speaking outside their competence &ndash; eg the physicist who comes out in favour of "intelligent design". Or they may not even be authorities at all. But in practice, we have to rely on authority when the only alternative is to become…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:25:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ben Austin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10215#post10215</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10215#post10215</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I found a fantastic attack on evolution last night, from the archives of the Atlantic Monthly (they sometimes trawl their old issues for stuff like this and post it on the front page). If only all opponents of evolution or science had this kind of amusing eloquence</p><p><a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/186703/evolution" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/186703/evolution</a></p><p>Here is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:18:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10210#post10210</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10210#post10210</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Haydn:</p><p>Fair question, and I take precisely no offence at it.  One thing I must certainly am is a citizen and an elector  in a representative democracy &ndash; and one which, by all indications, is going to see 'climate change' policy as a huge <em>political</em> issue in next year's general…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:06:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10209#post10209</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10209#post10209</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I blame Mary Shelley...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:58:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>dyan campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10202#post10202</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10202#post10202</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>If I want my friends eyes to glaze over I can talk about the latest cool stuff in plant molecular biology and I bet it's the same for climate scientists. So asking scientists to communicate better is an easy thing to ask but harder to achieve.</p><p>cheers<br />Bart</em></p><p>This reminds…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:48:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10201#post10201</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10201#post10201</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Bart, you said it far better than I, thanks. Perhaps we must also clearly differentiate between subjective and objective. The media of course likes the subjective stuff, me, I like the objective stuff so I can become subjective about it later on.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:46:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10196#post10196</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10196#post10196</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						...and my spelling goes toilet-wise...synthesis.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:40:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10195#post10195</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10195#post10195</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Ok a couple of comments</p><p>Russell you wrote</p><blockquote><p>It would be kind of cool to have an adult education course offering a rough guide to key principles. With drinks afterwards, ...</p></blockquote><p>You don't need to. There is a much easier way. Any time you want to know stuff from relevant…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:39:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10193#post10193</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10193#post10193</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>For a scientific theory to be proven as far as possible, and published (in a reputable scientific publication), you are supposed to have reached the synthesis stage.<br />There are very definite guidelines and it's not hard to follow.<br />Politics is about being seen to win, so the evaluative criteria is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:38:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tony Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10186#post10186</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10186#post10186</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Ok, weird coincidence of the day:</p><p>This morning on the <a href="http://blog.sciam.com/index.php?title=please_stop_talking_about_the_global_war&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1&amp;ref=rss " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> Scientific American editors blog</a> a discussion of the global warming consensus.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:24:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tony Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10183#post10183</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10183#post10183</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Craig:</p><p>I don't know how you feel about the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) as far as being "free of political, academic/institutional or ideological axe-grinding as humanly possible", but it really is the best summary of the data you're likely to find at the moment.</p><p>They have available [[…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:14:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10162#post10162</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10162#post10162</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The Ants Sin...<br />Thesis<br />Antithesis<br />Synthesis</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:03:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10161#post10161</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10161#post10161</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I'm increasingly of the opinion that there comes a point &ndash; fairly early on &ndash; where one has to trust the scientists about science, in much the same way you listen to experts about your car or your ailments. Or slightly more.</p><p>The trouble for the layman is spotting the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:58:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10157#post10157</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10157#post10157</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The president of the Pew Center on Global Climate Change is Eileen Claussen who has a pretty impressive CV &ndash; </p><p><a href="http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/erc/biographies/claussen.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/erc/biographies/claussen.html</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:38:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Graydon</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10156#post10156</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10156#post10156</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I am a New Zealander who has lived in Winnipeg since 1972. From 1995 until 2006 I was a member of the Board of the University of Winnipeg and served as Chair of the Board for 2003-04.<br />Dr. Tim Ball was indeed a Professor of Geography at the U of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:26:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hadyn Green</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10155#post10155</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10155#post10155</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>This is more of Friday morning grumble than anything and so Craig please take no offence at this (yours was just the first comment I read this morning):</p><blockquote><p>I have no pretensions to be any expert in any science</p></blockquote><p>Then why are you offering an opinion on a scientific issue?…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:20:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10152#post10152</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10152#post10152</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>So, could anyone recommend some reading on the subject that is as free of political, academic/institutional or ideological axe-grinding as humanly possible? Serious question, and serious answers would be much appreciated.</p></blockquote><p>I confess, the fact that the Pew Charitable Trusts got in behind the issue had an impact on my…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 08:25:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10150#post10150</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10150#post10150</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Russell:</p><p>Well, I'm not drawing any equivalence without seeing both (I was one of those tiresome 'mature' students who took <em>required reading</em> at face value, rather than regarding it as a pomo signifier that shouldn't cut into your drinking time) &ndash; just making the point that fudge isn't really anything…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 23:57:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10149#post10149</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10149#post10149</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I was being quite serious about one thing &ndash; I have no pretensions to be any expert in any science, and wish (with the perfection of 20/20 hindsight I'd done a lot more science and math when I had the chance.</p></blockquote><p>It would be kind of cool to have an…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 23:36:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10148#post10148</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10148#post10148</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Russell:</p><p>Ok, I'll cop to a wee bit of hyperbole &ndash; but while I think there's room for polemic and flat out nakedly biased advocacy in the documentary form, but it's equally important that the people who make it are honest with the viewer, and the viewer doesn't confuse a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 23:03:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10146#post10146</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10146#post10146</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>BTW, does Channel Four (the UK one) do anything but shock-docs? I'm looking forward to seeing The Prince of Wales Is A Retarded C**t Not Competent to Run A Gang-Bang In A Whorehouse, or whatever the thing is that's gotten Charles so agitated over the last week or so.</p></blockquote><p>Sadly,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:51:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10145#post10145</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10145#post10145</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>So I should treat The Great Global Warming Swindle with the same extreme scepticism as a certain Oscar-winning polemic on the same subject call An Inconvenient Truth?</p></blockquote><p>I honestly don't think its fair to compare the two. You can debate the claims of Gore's movie, but The Great Global Warming…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:48:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10144#post10144</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10144#post10144</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						BTW, does Channel Four (the UK one) do anything but shock-docs?  I'm looking forward to seeing <em>The Prince of Wales Is A Retarded C**t  Not Competent to Run A Gang-Bang In A Whorehouse</em>, or whatever the thing is that's gotten Charles so agitated over the last week or so.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:32:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10143#post10143</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10143#post10143</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Russell:</p><p>So I should treat <em>The Great Global Warming Swindle</em> with the same extreme scepticism as a certain Oscar-winning polemic on the same subject call <em>An Inconvenient Truth</em>?  And at the same time, take a wee while to get my head around and reflect on a pretty complex and contentious…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:29:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10140#post10140</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10140#post10140</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>"Fuck off you crazy old dyke."</p></blockquote><p>And I got told off in ENGL 320 just for calling Deconstruction 'intellectual wanking'. I still bear a deep, primal loathing for Post-modernism, even though it once got me laid.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:15:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10139#post10139</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10139#post10139</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>"Fuck off you crazy old dyke."<br />I love it. Do you have a link?</p></blockquote><p>Yep. The site seems to be down but <a href="http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:xpvdFekC6PYJ:website.lineone.net/~jon.simmons/julie/paglia.htm+%22Fuck+off+you+crazy+old+dyke%22&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;cd=1" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">it's still there in the Google cache</a>.</p><p>I have my misgivings about Burchill, but she was cracking in this.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:52:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10135#post10135</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10135#post10135</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>How would Darwinian thinking be brought to bear on social policy?</p></blockquote><p>If one accepts that the mind, our moral faculties and our very ability to socialise rely on in-built mechanisms that evolved then it makes a great deal of sense that an understanding of evolution should have a role in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:31:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Ackroyd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10132#post10132</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10132#post10132</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>1.</p><blockquote><p>If in 20 years we discover that we could have stopped global warming and we did nothing our children will not forgive us.</p></blockquote><p><Devil's Advocate><br />Isn't the whole "we owe it to our children" thing just craven hedging?<br /></Devils's Advocate></p><p><br />2.</p><blockquote><p>"Fuck off you crazy old dyke."</p></blockquote><p>I love it. Do you have a link?…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:58:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10131#post10131</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10131#post10131</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>While the RCP is definitely wrong on global warming, I wouldn't regard every idea that they have as wrong headed.</p><p>I think their ideology stems from anti-authoritarianism (hence opposition to immigration controls, internet censorship). They have a view, which I share, that western governments (especially Britain) are willing to sacrifice…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:31:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10130#post10130</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10130#post10130</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>If in 20 years we discover that global warming doesn't exist or is not caused by us then by acting now we will have lost very little (a couple of percentage point lost from GDP).</p></blockquote><p>Or even an increase in human knowledge as we're obliged to think harder to maintain…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:22:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10129#post10129</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10129#post10129</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>writing shlock sci-fi/horror just wasn't scratching that itch ...</p></blockquote><p>Keep at it. Wellington is <em>so</em> the kind of town where you'd sell that script.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:18:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10128#post10128</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10128#post10128</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'm pomo intolerant. Gives me irritable brain syndrome.</p></blockquote><p>I think what gets me is the way the famous pomo thinkers and their acolytes tend to regard obscurity as a virtue. And when the rest of us make the bullshit call on bad writing, we're decried as anti-intellectual.</p><p>So I have…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:16:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>dylan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10124#post10124</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10124#post10124</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>For me the point about the climate debate is not whether or not you can absolutely prove that human activity is contributing to global warming but whether or not their is sufficient evidence to support action. </p><p>The mind set goes something like...<br />If in 20 years we discover that we…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:39:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Che Tibby</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10122#post10122</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10122#post10122</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Blimey, Che has a blog.</p></blockquote><p>writing shlock sci-fi/horror just wasn't scratching that itch.</p><p>main thing to note is that the content of object dart will differ from politique substantially.</p><p>turns out that i was being rather closely monitored from within the state sector, and the best distance i can maintain…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:15:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10121#post10121</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10121#post10121</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Refuting statistics is a long process, it is impossible unless fully acquainted with any stats presented, the methodology used to arrive at the stat, and the information to be conveyed. And if any of the calculations are wrong.. well you get the picture.</p><p>So it takes someone who knows a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:06:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tony Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10120#post10120</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10120#post10120</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Bart:<br />I know what you are saying &ndash; as a working scientist I know that I spend a lot of time working on reports, and  I try to make those reports as readable and applicable to the audience as possible. The vast majority of those reports are only ever seen…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:02:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10115#post10115</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10115#post10115</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>While the RCP is definitely wrong on global warming, I wouldn't regard every idea that they have as wrong headed. </p><p>I think their ideology stems from anti-authoritarianism (hence opposition to immigration controls, internet censorship). They have a view, which I share, that western governments (especially Britain) are willing to sacrifice…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:24:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10114#post10114</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10114#post10114</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Tony wrote</p><blockquote><p>I think maybe scientists need to do a better job explaining to the general public why they truly do believe ...</p></blockquote><p>Heh As someone involved in the GE debate I can say fairly confidently that communication is only part of the answer. Some folks don't want to listen…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:22:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10111#post10111</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10111#post10111</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Hi Andrew</p><p>I should probably read to the bottom of the thread to see if any others have replied but I can't help myself.</p><p>What you've forgotten is turbulence.</p><p>Yes CO2 is heavier that Nitrogen or oxygen the major components of the atmosphere, so yes if air is completely undisturbed…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:10:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10107#post10107</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10107#post10107</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I'm not sure how fortunate the choice [Singer's] of 'Darwinian' as an adjective was. As in, I actually don't know because I haven't read the book.</p><p>For me, 'Darwinian' in the context just made me think of some evolutionary psychology which fits more into the 'sociological wishful thinking' (or at…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:03:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Ackroyd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10101#post10101</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10101#post10101</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I merely meant to suggest that a move from "blank-slate" to "informed by science not sociological wishful thinking" philosophy in the formulation of social policy might be seen as a Good Thing. By me, for instance.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:31:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10099#post10099</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10099#post10099</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Sophisting is against nature...</blockquote>You'd be amazed what you can find on the internet, though.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:24:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10097#post10097</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10097#post10097</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Oh and journalists and statistics... so tragic. It might be amplified by the way it can sometimes only takes one person in a medium sized chain. For example, if the guy who decides what's newsworthy has no grasp of statistical significance, he probably won't be told.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:23:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Ackroyd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10096#post10096</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10096#post10096</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>That give me an idea &ndash; perhaps an elimatination diet, Russell? I mean, is it the dialectic, the poststructuralism ...</p></blockquote><p>I'm pomo intolerant. Gives me irritable brain syndrome.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:21:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10094#post10094</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10094#post10094</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"Darwinian thinking as it applies to human nature should be brought to bear on social policy"</p><p>How would Darwinian thinking be brought to bear on social policy? Eg, it seems obvious that stepfathers would have an in-built disposition to improve their reproductive success and murder their stepchildren having impregnated their…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:19:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10093#post10093</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10093#post10093</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Sophisting is against nature...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:18:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10092#post10092</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10092#post10092</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Do you break out in a rash when close to Stephen Franks?</p></blockquote><p>That give me an idea &ndash; perhaps an elimatination diet, Russell? I mean, is it the dialectic, the poststructuralism ...</p><p>I would suggest you started by avoiding sophistry, but they put that stuff in everything these days.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:15:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Ackroyd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10091#post10091</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10091#post10091</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>DOH, I thought Tom was just being all Paul Holmesey...</p></blockquote><p>*looks around, points at self*<br />who, me?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:14:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Riddley Walker</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10089#post10089</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10089#post10089</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Looks like Durkin went to the <strong>Coddington Memorial School of Pretend Statistics</strong>. <br />And how dare he use the title <em>Against Nature</em> for his neocon rubbish, Huysmans' original novel from which he stole the title is a masterpiece of subtlety and subversion of conservative dogma. Seems Channel 4 is inviting a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:12:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10086#post10086</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10086#post10086</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But does being allergic to Marxist analysis make me an anti-intellectual?</p></blockquote><p>Maybe. Do  you break out in a rash when close to Stephen Franks?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:04:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10075#post10075</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10075#post10075</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						DOH, I thought Tom was just being all Paul Holmesey...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:50:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hadyn Green</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10074#post10074</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10074#post10074</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Re: Stats and Mediawatch:<br />I also reccommend <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/page/2_1125.html?" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Answers Guy</a> in the Wall St Journal.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:49:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10073#post10073</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10073#post10073</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Don't sweep! Set the little leaves free! <br />In Weli of course leaves become deadly weapons in a southerly...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:48:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10071#post10071</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10071#post10071</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Oh, on the subject of weather Auckland had some wind yesterday. Where do we send the food parcels?</p></blockquote><p>Thanks for your concern, Don. Yeah it's pretty bad; the leaves to be swept up at our place number literally in the <em>thousands</em>, but we'll struggle through, as always.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:41:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10069#post10069</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10069#post10069</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Russell Brown anti-intellectual? Surely not. Eh, readers.</p></blockquote><p>No, not really. I just get antsy when people brandish Marxist analyses and I like to rile Tze Ming by making fun of people who use the word "discourse" a lot.</p><p>Actually, I'm reviewing a book called 'Speaking Truth to Power: Public Intellectuals…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:40:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Ackroyd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10063#post10063</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10063#post10063</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Russell Brown anti-intellectual? Surely not. Eh, readers.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:06:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10062#post10062</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10062#post10062</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The strong winds made my windscreen wiper blades really noisy on my windscreen, I was reminded of my childhood, had to pullover and sob quietly recalling the shuddering slap of tea towel on child flesh, ohhh The Horror, The Horror.</p></blockquote><p>Oh damn. I have to drive somewhere soon. I'll need…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:04:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10061#post10061</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10061#post10061</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>I enjoy reading spiked but where Furedi et al lose me is their refusal to accept that Darwinian thinking as it applies to human nature should be brought to bear on social policy. (See Peter Singer and the "Darwinian Left"). They still have a discredited (Marxist?) belief in the plasticity…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:03:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Ackroyd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10059#post10059</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10059#post10059</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Blimey, Che has a blog.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:00:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10058#post10058</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10058#post10058</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The strong winds made my windscreen wiper blades really noisy on my windscreen, I was reminded of my childhood, had to pullover and sob quietly recalling the shuddering slap of tea towel on child flesh, ohhh The Horror, The Horror.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:59:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Che Tibby</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10057#post10057</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10057#post10057</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I lost my internet connection for the whole night! What if I'd had a medical emergency in that time??</p></blockquote><p>a medical emergency that can only be solved using the internet implies an activity that one should not have been conducting.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:58:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ben Austin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10055#post10055</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10055#post10055</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Things were tough all over. </p><p>My power cut during the day so when I got home last night I had to retime all the clocks. Sometimes I swear Kelburn is like a 3rd world country.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:55:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Heather Gaye</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10054#post10054</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10054#post10054</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But yeah, it was terrible</p></blockquote><p>I lost my internet connection for the whole night!  What if I'd had a medical emergency in that time??</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:52:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10053#post10053</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10053#post10053</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I did my bit! I went to Auckland Uni as an adult student and did Statistics (while I worked a job). I can honestly say, I have not been the same since, that bell curve eh? Oh, and being old, deaf and stupid, I could not hear nor understand my…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:51:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10052#post10052</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10052#post10052</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						On the topic of statistics and their use in the media: yes, it's sometimes an absolute horrorshow. When I was hosting Mediawatch we had a health statistician who would come on sometimes and unravel stuff. That was handy.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:51:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Ackroyd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10051#post10051</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10051#post10051</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I enjoy reading <a href="http://www.spiked-online.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">spiked</a> but where Furedi et al lose me is their refusal to accept that Darwinian thinking as it applies to human nature should be brought to bear on social policy. (See Peter Singer and the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Darwinian-Left-Politics-Evolution-Cooperation/dp/0300083238" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">"Darwinian Left"</a>). They still have a discredited (Marxist?) belief in the plasticity…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:50:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nobody Important</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10050#post10050</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10050#post10050</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Watching the Today show on Prime the other morning (the  Aussie breakfast show from Channel 7 &ndash; or is 9?) I noticed the topic for the day seemed to be the 'confirmation' overnight from scientists that serious errors had been proven in Al Gore's <em>Inconvenient Truth</em> doco and we could…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:50:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Che Tibby</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10049#post10049</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10049#post10049</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But yeah, it was terrible. One of our empty blue recyclying bins blew all the way to the other side of the cul de sac. I thought I was going to die.</p></blockquote><p>damnit brown... no making me gaffaw at work! 2.48 is not tea/lunch break time.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:48:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10048#post10048</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10048#post10048</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Russell, someone on Morning Report complained the wind had given her a "runny nose". I think Akls getting its own back after the EQ thing.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:46:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10047#post10047</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10047#post10047</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But yeah, it was terrible. One of our empty blue recyclying bins blew all the way to the other side of the cul de sac. I thought I was going to die.</p></blockquote><p>That noise it made as it dragged along the asphalt, you know that's not an earthquake right? So…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:46:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10046#post10046</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10046#post10046</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Andrew Smith, in more helpful mode you might find <a href="http://environment.guardian.co.uk/climatechange/story/0,,2032821,00.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this Guardian article</a> interesting.</p><blockquote><p>it is important that on big questions such as climate change scientists make an assessment of what they know at key moments when policy or other collective decisions need to be made. Today is such a time.</p></blockquote><p>…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:42:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10045#post10045</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10045#post10045</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Oh, on the subject of weather Auckland had some wind yesterday. Where do we send the food parcels?</p></blockquote><p>Just send up Moore Wilson, thanks.</p><p>But yeah, it was <em>terrible</em>. One of our empty blue recyclying bins blew <em>all the way to the other side of the cul de sac</em>. I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:37:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10044#post10044</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10044#post10044</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Oh, on the subject of weather Auckland had some wind yesterday. Where do we send the food parcels?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:31:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10041#post10041</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10041#post10041</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I spent my first three years trying really hard to fit a BIOL paper into my English degree. Couldn't squeeze in the labs, they either clashed with my lectures, my tutes, or my drinking time.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:26:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ben Austin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10040#post10040</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10040#post10040</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						For what its worth I fully support requiring undergraduate courses whether they be science, commerce, arts or misc. to include subjects from outside of the core course(s).  Thats what I did, it is not particularly hard to do, even if you are trying to complete the degree course quickly or…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:22:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hadyn Green</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10039#post10039</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10039#post10039</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And students studying arts at Uni should be forced to...</p></blockquote><p>...date the science kids</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:21:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Che Tibby</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10038#post10038</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10038#post10038</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And students studying arts at Uni should be forced to...</p></blockquote><p>enrol in a degree with more purpose...</p><p>(says he with a middling BA from vuw)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:19:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hadyn Green</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10036#post10036</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10036#post10036</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						dammit need to type faster!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:12:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hadyn Green</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10034#post10034</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10034#post10034</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						As someone whose role is to convey (often very complex numeric) information to the public I can say that all of the training in the world cannot help you when you hand over your stuff to the media (read idiots, no offence Russell) and they rip it to bits and…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:11:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10032#post10032</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10032#post10032</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And students studying arts at Uni should be forced to...</p><p>I'm just curious is all.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:08:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10031#post10031</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10031#post10031</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And poets, science...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:07:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ben Austin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10030#post10030</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10030#post10030</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Just another reason why students studying science at university should be forced to study rhetoric
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:02:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tony Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10029#post10029</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10029#post10029</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Che:</p><p>If you mean David Hayward at SGES at Auckland Uni, then you ought to talk to his boss Willie Smith. </p><p>He can certainly string a sentence or two together himself (legs off a chair and all that). But he's Scottish, so I don't know if his sentences qualify as…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:01:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Che Tibby</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10028#post10028</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10028#post10028</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"scientists" + "explaining to the general public".</p><p>god i laughed...</p><p>mostly because you're right, and because the only scientist i never met who seems to be able to string two coherent sentences together is david hayward.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:51:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Smith</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10026#post10026</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10026#post10026</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yeah, you are right Hadyn, I need to chill out!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:48:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tony Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10024#post10024</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10024#post10024</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Andrew:</p><p>I'm not saying that there's anything wrong with doing light research on the internet (god knows I love the Wikipedia), but its no replacement for a solid four years spent researching the entire breadth and depth of a topic to gain a PhD and then devoting your adult life…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:35:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hadyn Green</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10023#post10023</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10023#post10023</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						ps. I thought Don Christie was funny
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:35:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Martha  Craig</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10022#post10022</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10022#post10022</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I believe I actually pimped Sue's services for baby making, not my own.</p><p>I may have failed to mention it to her though.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:34:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hadyn Green</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10021#post10021</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10021#post10021</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>On the subject of pimping (sorry Martha), I'll also be selling my <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/94364624@N00/sets/72157594360973465/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">t-shirts</a> at Craft 2.0</p><p>Re: Climate stuff. Wasn't there some great "idea" a while ago to pump allthe excess CO2 into the sea via giant pipelines?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:33:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Che Tibby</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10016#post10016</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10016#post10016</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Carbon dioxide dissolves in sea water</p></blockquote><p>you might find that this is causing <a href="http://www.misunderstooduniverse.com/Global_Warming_Problems.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">acidification</a> of the oceans. (dunno how reliable that link is).</p><p>and russell. a man could do worse. threaten the waving of consumer guarantee act if martha doesn't arrive in one piece.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:23:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Smith</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10013#post10013</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10013#post10013</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks Tony, good stuff you are pointing at.  As I said debate is good. I don't think the Don Christie's of the world are very helpful though. I'll look into your reasoning. By the way, what's wrong with doing research on the internet, that's where a lot of credible information…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:13:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10012#post10012</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10012#post10012</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But back to the Crafts<br />Thanks for pimping our little project Russell.</p><p>i think martha promised she'd have your babies in return so let me know when you want her posted up ;)</p></blockquote><p>Jeebus. That photo from the Great Blend and the undies in the mail were trouble enough ...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:09:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>plum</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10011#post10011</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10011#post10011</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Andrew &mdash; I am not a climate scientist, but saying CO2 is heavier than air <em>in the Earth's surface</em> says nothing about it's activity higher up. Perhaps air movements higher up keep it moving. Perhaps it reacts chemically with other molecules. For example, ozone is good up there, but down…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:09:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sue</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10009#post10009</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10009#post10009</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>But back to the Crafts<br />Thanks for pimping our little project Russell.</p><p>i think martha promised she'd have your babies in return so let me know when you want her posted up ;)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:03:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10007#post10007</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10007#post10007</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But CO2 will eventually fall to earth.</p></blockquote><p>So we suffocate before we overheat. Unless we smoke pot. Chill, problem solved.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:51:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tony Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10003#post10003</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10003#post10003</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Andrew:<br />This is a common mistake to make. This is the clearest answer I could find on Yahoo answers to clarify this for you:</p><p><br />"The atmosphere is a mixture of different gases, and CO2 is one of the heaviest, but it does not form layers.</p><p>Up to a height of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:26:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Ackroyd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10002#post10002</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10002#post10002</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Sorry Andrew  &ndash; what exactly does the well-known fact that carbon dioxide is heavier than air have to do with the global warming debate? And where is your evidence that "CO2 will eventually fall to earth."? Like, when?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:16:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael Stevens</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10001#post10001</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=10001#post10001</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks for this post russell &ndash; interesting to see how far Furedi's net has been cast.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:13:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Smith</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=9999#post9999</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=9999#post9999</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The Global warming debate won't go away. There's still too much science to be discussed. The recent UN report is very controversial and somewhat biased. Just look at the presumption that CO2 is the cause of much of the problem.</p><p>Here's a slightly peculiar sight to illustrate this:<br /><a href="http://cannabisculture.com/articles/1804.html." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://cannabisculture.com/articles/1804.html.</a></p><p>Gases…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:01:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joanna</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=9998#post9998</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=9998#post9998</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Martha, Sue and co. open their Craft 2.0 exhibition at the New Dowse on Saturday from 11am-4pm</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://kimberleyrothwell.blogspot.com/index.html " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Special K</a> will be selling some baking by me to fundraise for Oxfam, although of course apparently I <a href="http://www.hubris.co.nz/entry.php?id=703070138#insulin " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">taste like diabetes</a>.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:48:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=9997#post9997</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-shonky-scepticism/?p=9997#post9997</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:48:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
