<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Hard News: Political Idol, or whatever you want to call it</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Hebe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293623#post293623</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293623#post293623</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> ‘This is the Day’ with more ‘Beef’!</q></p><p>Haven't heard of that before. BMT.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 15:06:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293614#post293614</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293614#post293614</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I’ll raise you The The...</q><br />thanks for that, but...<br />...I prefer my <em>'This is the Day'</em> with more 'Beef'!<br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEp7JWEWBuw" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEp7JWEWBuw</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 14:34:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hebe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293601#post293601</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293601#post293601</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Fall track? I’ll raise you The The. This thread makes me think of the “this will be the day/when things will surely change” line. The Muldoon-Thatcher-era parallels  in our political landscape and society are startling to me. Or did I not get enough sleep?</p><p><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phWv7l8Lm_A" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phWv7l8Lm_A</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 13:17:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293551#post293551</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293551#post293551</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Mark's hissed theory...</strong><br />Welcome to the <em>'Lie dream of a casino soul'</em></p><p><q> __There's a silent rumble<br />In the buildings of the night council<br />It's a meeting of controllers<br />Who drive right through the gates<br />In white roll-tops</p><p>And i guess this just goes to show<br />The lie dream of the…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 10:19:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>llew40</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293537#post293537</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293537#post293537</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						maybe, but politics is a blood sport, so while it would be nice to think that any opposition will consider such an approach entirely on its merits, I'm cynical enough to think that political opportunism will always be a factor.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 08:42:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Telfar Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293531#post293531</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293531#post293531</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>You mean… work together? Across party lines?</q>Even if the parties can't or won't do this, I was thinking more that whichever company was wanting to sign the contract should go to the opposition and say "hey, here's what we're trying to thrash out with the Government, could you live with…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 07:27:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293530#post293530</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293530#post293530</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>corporate rights</q></p><p>The only rights that matter, as far as the current regime are concerned.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 07:24:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293524#post293524</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293524#post293524</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>A consequence of reneging on the 30 year part of deal would be that other parties in future might not believe the government if they attempted to negotiate such a deal again. It would set up a precedent that corporations couldn’t buy our laws, so we’d never be able to…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 22:05:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>paynter</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293521#post293521</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293521#post293521</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>going botulistic</q></p><p>There's your word of the year right there.</p><p>My take is that if the Government can legislate to take away caregivers' rights to compensation and to legally challenge Government decisions, then the precedent has already been set, and the casino company in question should not be surprised to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 21:12:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293500#post293500</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293500#post293500</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I sat on the Labour Policy Council when we were drafting the current Platform</q></p><p>Good work, sir.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 17:26:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293473#post293473</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293473#post293473</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Perhaps if there’s a financial reason for an arrangement to last longer than 3 years, it would make sense to come to an agreement llikely to have cross-party support?</q></p><p>You mean… work together? Across party lines? How completely ridiculous! A strong leader doesn’t need bipartisan accord on anything, (s)he just…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 14:38:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Telfar Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293469#post293469</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293469#post293469</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I think that people should be able to work with governments on time frames longer than three years.</q><br />Perhaps if there’s a financial reason for an arrangement to last longer than 3 years, it would make sense to come to an agreement llikely to have cross-party support?</p><p>If you know…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 14:20:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293462#post293462</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293462#post293462</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>I don’t buy this argument. Parliament is still sovereign, the government has just signed up to a deal allowing compensation if parliament exerts it’s sovereignty. Parliament can wipe the law any time it wants, and if it really wants it can go further and say “fuck you” and not pay…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:58:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293461#post293461</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293461#post293461</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I think that people should be able to work with governments on time frames longer than three years. Obviously I'm not a fan of the SkyCity deal, and we need to take firm regulatory action on pokies etc (hi Tony!), but we also have to make sure that the government…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:57:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293452#post293452</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293452#post293452</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> But there would be consequences.</q></p><p>Naturally, as there is from not doing it, too. Which one is worse? A consequence of reneging on the 30 year part of deal would be that other parties in future might not believe the government if they attempted to negotiate such a deal again.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:42:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293428#post293428</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293428#post293428</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If a government makes a stupid, stupid cripplingly expensive deal, and the next government decides to can it, I don’t have a problem with that. It might teach the corporations not to be so greedy in future.</q></p><p>I've been waiting most of three decades for the government to come to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 10:16:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293425#post293425</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293425#post293425</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						If people are upset with a future government denying Sky City compensation, they could always pay the money out and then levy a tax on casino operators to claw it back. Governments have the absolute right to choose what taxes to levy, right?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:53:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hebe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293423#post293423</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293423#post293423</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>(and it’s starting to look like the govt may have created most of the furore about ‘Botulismilk’ etc – another own goal?)</q></p><p>They're going botulistic?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:24:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hebe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293421#post293421</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293421#post293421</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I can see Br’er Key grinning, gloating –<br />“ta baby, for throwing me in the Brierley Patch!<br />It’s been fun, sell sell, sell!”</p><p>NB: commissar-orations extended, if offence given<br />;- )</q></p><p>Oooh you're good Ian! <br />The Commissar is growling in the background that normal show trials will be resumed as…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:22:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293418#post293418</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293418#post293418</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>regime chains…</strong><br /><q>It’s an undertaking the government didn’t <br />have constitutional power to make.</q><br />Something they are doing a lot of lately…<br />… and after being told they are wrong<br />they <em>still</em> want to get their own way…</p><p>Key and cronies are proving there may be some truth in that hoary…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:09:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen R</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293412#post293412</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293412#post293412</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						That won't stop PgpKey saying that Franks doesn't understand the legislation though.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 08:11:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293409#post293409</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293409#post293409</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Stephen Franks, who was deftly retained by the Green Party</q></p><p>Whoever thought of using Franks is a genius. As a former Act MP he cannot simply be dismissed as a tool of the simpering lefty establishment.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 08:01:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293408#post293408</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293408#post293408</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But who gets to decide what is a ‘good’ deal or not, and what would unintended consequences be on future corporate interest in investing in NZ when deals or regulations (e.g. auckland airport and OIO rules) might get reneged on or changed with the political wind?</q></p><p>On the other hand,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 07:57:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293405#post293405</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293405#post293405</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But who gets to decide what is a ‘good’ deal or not</q></p><p>Not tampering with the principle of parliamentary sovereignty would be a good starting benchmark. Easily followed, and ought to be obvious why it's a benchmark. If the deal can't stack up without trying to force future parliaments to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 07:21:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>llew40</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293403#post293403</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293403#post293403</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Heh, yes that would be a good guide. But what does it mean to you?. Take, for example, the Lange/Douglas Government policies. Surely they were motivated by a genuine belief that long-term future well being  of NZ would be best served by modernising the economy, knowing there would be a…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 06:46:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293392#post293392</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293392#post293392</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>sayin it aint raisin it <br />#sultana</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 22:56:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293390#post293390</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293390#post293390</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>tribunals, dude :)</q></p><p>No, you already bid that, and got raised.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 22:53:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293384#post293384</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293384#post293384</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>There is no higher authority</q></p><p>tribunals, dude :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 21:59:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293382#post293382</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293382#post293382</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But who gets to decide what is a ‘good’ deal or not</q></p><p>In a technical sense, the government decides. There is no higher authority.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 21:52:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293376#post293376</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293376#post293376</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						outstanding #onya
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 21:42:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293375#post293375</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293375#post293375</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Dunne will be gutted #ties
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 21:41:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Carol Green</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293374#post293374</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293374#post293374</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I used that Native Affairs screenshot as an inspiration for my cartoon-of-the-day (part of my <a href="http://100daysproject.co.nz/project/2013/416/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">100 Days project</a>).
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 21:40:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293372#post293372</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293372#post293372</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>who gets to decide what is a 'good' deal or not</q></p><p>basic humanity is a good guide</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 21:39:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>llew40</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293371#post293371</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293371#post293371</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Well .., it would be a helluva precedent. You might not like this particular government deal with a corporate (for good reasons) and may well be ok with the idea of a new government reneging and telling them to go fuck themselves.</p><p>But who gets to decide what is a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 21:38:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293353#post293353</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293353#post293353</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> It does quite quickly become difficult to feel sympathy for SkyCity.</q></p><p>It's difficult at the best of times.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 18:09:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293352#post293352</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293352#post293352</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>trade tribunals, sir..</q></p><p>I see your tribunal, and raise you "shutting off diplomatic ties".</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 18:04:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293347#post293347</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293347#post293347</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>in return for their licence not being put up for public auction when it runs its term in 2021 or whenever it is.</q><br />... of course there is no guarantees Sky City will last that long either, funny old business, gambling.<br />Then what happens?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 17:38:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293345#post293345</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293345#post293345</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>There is no world government to enforce anything on a government</q></p><p>trade tribunals, sir..</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 17:28:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293338#post293338</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293338#post293338</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Precisely. If the deal is only worth doing by way of an “unconstitutional” (inasmuch as such is possible in this country) attempt to bind future parliaments, the deal is probably not worth doing.</q></p><p>It was also, as the deputy auditor-general's report noted, done via a deeply unsatisfactory process in which…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 17:04:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293335#post293335</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293335#post293335</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It might teach the corporations not to be so greedy in future.</q></p><p>Precisely. If the deal is only worth doing by way of an "unconstitutional" (inasmuch as such is possible in this country) attempt to bind future parliaments, the deal is probably not worth doing.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 16:48:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293331#post293331</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293331#post293331</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If our government is going to renege on the deal, we should expect to have to pay. That’s what happens when you go back on your word.</q></p><p>It would be a better business practice not to go back on big corporate deals, if you want to make more of them…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 16:27:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293290#post293290</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293290#post293290</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Sky City are spending lots of money on building a convention centre in return for umpteen years of stupid gambling laws</q></p><p><strong>And</strong> in return for their licence not being put up for public auction when it runs its term in 2021 or whenever it is. The returns from that auction…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:26:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293269#post293269</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293269#post293269</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Basically it comes down to this: do the people of NZ tell multinational companies what to do in our country, or do they tell us what to do? It would be nice to vote on that.</q></p><p>I think the Sky City deal was appalling. But I'd be equally appalled if…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:23:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293259#post293259</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293259#post293259</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> I always like the Opposition to be an effective check and balance on the Government of the day.</q></p><p>Word. Particularly since I don't think you're thrilled about the current government's willingness to stomp all over procedural checks and conventional balances.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:41:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293251#post293251</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293251#post293251</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>SHOCK! HORROR!  I always like the Opposition to be an effective check and balance on the Government of the day. I don’t think Cunliffe would be an unspeakably offensive leader of the Labour Party; neither would Robertson.  Both got their strengths and flaws, but who doesn’t?</q></p><p>Perfectly put Craig. Have…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:26:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293242#post293242</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293242#post293242</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>STOP PRESS. Craig Ranapia inadvertently endorses David Cunliffe as potential Labour leader most likely to cause to serious headaches for National. :P</q></p><p>SHOCK! HORROR!  I always like the Opposition to be an effective check and balance on the Government of the day. I don't think Cunliffe would be an unspeakably…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 09:22:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293241#post293241</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293241#post293241</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And as if to illustrate things, here's Norman <a href="http://tvnz.co.nz/breakfast-news/greens-stay-labour-contest-video-5545101" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">being very conciliatory</a> on breakfast television over the leadership contest.</p><p>__What is the Green Party’s strategy to avoid the fate of many other minor parties in coalition? Obviously every minor party is different and the Greens are no Lib Dems or Alliance…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 09:16:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293238#post293238</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293238#post293238</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Like Cunliffe actually rallying a group of party supporters rather than talking about how he could, you mean? Saw how that went down with the Thorndon keyboard warriors..</q></p><p>At the GCSB protest on Queen Street, Cunliffe was there early and visible, with a young electorate crew all in matching red…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 07:25:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Caleb D&#039;Anvers</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293237#post293237</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293237#post293237</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And that’s where Labour should start saying “fuckity-byes” to Cunliffe ... [gratuitous Sarah Palin analogy] ...</q><br />STOP PRESS. Craig Ranapia inadvertently endorses David Cunliffe as potential Labour leader most likely to cause to serious headaches for National. :P</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 03:41:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ben Austin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293235#post293235</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293235#post293235</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						What is the Green Party's strategy to avoid the fate of many other minor parties in coalition?  Obviously every minor party is different and the Greens are no Lib Dems or Alliance (sorta), but are they strong enough to survive the unpopularity of government?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 02:44:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293234#post293234</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293234#post293234</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Indeed, it's junior partner, no matter how you dice it. But it could be a very significant junior if it is required for the majority. This looks likely, if the left are to get in at all.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 01:58:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293229#post293229</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293229#post293229</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q><br /> It would be a given of such a government that Russel Norman would be its deputy leader.<br /></q></p><p>I don't take anything as given, actually. They'll look to make the Greens fight for a lot of things, so they can give some things while denying others. Positions of power will be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 23:23:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293228#post293228</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293228#post293228</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						You'd think everyone got that, yes.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 21:49:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293227#post293227</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293227#post293227</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The total tonal difference between his launch event and that Maori TV appearance should give some commentators pause.</q></p><p>That different circumstances require different approaches? You don't have to be a politician to know that. Hell, I learned that from my grandmother.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 21:41:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293223#post293223</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293223#post293223</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The total tonal difference between his launch event and that Maori TV appearance should give some commentators pause.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 21:12:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Chris Waugh</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293221#post293221</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293221#post293221</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Saw how that went down with the Thorndon keyboard warriors</q></p><p>I did note that in that Native Affairs interview Cunliffe said he'd learned. What were his words? Something like "there's nothing like being kicked to the backbenches for 18 months to teach you to listen. Also, the new set-up means…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 20:47:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293214#post293214</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293214#post293214</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I wanted to see more of "I'm the one for this job, and let me show you how".</q></p><p>Like Cunliffe actually rallying a group of party supporters rather than talking about how he could, you mean? Saw how that went down with the Thorndon keyboard warriors..</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:46:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293213#post293213</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293213#post293213</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Which is why I suggested that there are 3 distinct styles. </q></p><p>Please do say how you see them.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:44:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>martinb</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293212#post293212</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293212#post293212</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Well it's a better negotiating position than take our work rights, our public tv land and have a train station to deliver gamblers straight to the casino, and stuff the St James.</p><p>Perhaps the Nats should look straight into a naming rights deal. SkyCity sums up the values of the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:06:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293205#post293205</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293205#post293205</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I would imagine that the implosion of ACT and UF may have led to some people not voting or even voting for a leftist party.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 18:07:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293203#post293203</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293203#post293203</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Account suspended. Heh.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:40:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293201#post293201</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293201#post293201</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I favour the idea that they fucked up, TBH. The last election was actually quite close. Usually there's a consolidation of lead in the first election. Instead National picked up votes but the rest of the right completely died, and NZF was born again.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:29:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293200#post293200</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293200#post293200</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>National has had their obligatory 2 turns</q></p><p>Unfortunately, in NZ it's historically been an obligatory 3 terms. That's the median stay. If Labour get in, they're actually bucking the trend. Or, possibly more accurately, National have fucked up.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:18:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293199#post293199</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293199#post293199</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						There should just be a fakehood/reality switch in twitter. Personally I'd keep it set on 'fake' at all times.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:07:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293198#post293198</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293198#post293198</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						My pick is that the genuine Cunliffe has reported it as a hoax account; Twitter would have taken it down; and if the troll/deluded person has made a case that it's clear from the handle that they are not David Cunliffe, it's been reinstated.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 16:50:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293196#post293196</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293196#post293196</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And the account is dead now, which suggests to me at least that if it was a troll, it was a genuine one. A satirical troll wouldn’t pack up shop like that.</q></p><p>It's back!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 16:37:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293194#post293194</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293194#post293194</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> but I think we run the risk of being disappointed if we think that everyone will respond to the same signals.</q></p><p>Which is why I suggested that there are 3 distinct styles. Plus, pointing out that (I think) Nactional are full of it and that it seemed to work for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 16:17:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Butler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293193#post293193</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293193#post293193</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>@CunliffeLeader is a troll</q></p><p>And the account is dead now, which suggests to me at least that if it was a troll, it was a genuine one. A satirical troll wouldn't pack up shop like that.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 16:12:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293191#post293191</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293191#post293191</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>This just tweeted by David Cunliffe:</p><p><q> Afternoon all. @CunliffeLeader is a troll and has nothing to do with our campaign. We’re keeping it positive. Thanks.</q></p><p>The account itself has been deleted, raising the possibility that it was in fact the work of an extremely deluded supporter who has finally got…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 16:08:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Howard Edwards</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293190#post293190</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293190#post293190</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Just what, precisely, is the difference between these three? They all seemed to be saying the exact same thing. They, Robertson especially, also seemed to endorse each other.</q></p><p>One of them will attract more floating votes and get a higher preferred Prime Minister rating than the other two.</p><p>The tricky…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:55:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>llew40</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293189#post293189</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293189#post293189</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks Mikaere. In this particular case I was referring to the candidates responses cited by RB to the Sky City question. I do understand that there are some considered responses out there (I generally vote Green and have a passing acquantance with Scoop).  </p><p>And really my bigger question was more…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:30:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jason Kemp</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293188#post293188</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293188#post293188</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Labour has a good chance of a decent comeback this time if they get a clean result. </p><p>National has had their obligatory 2 turns and I'm afraid the Sky City thing, GSCB, Meridian and a few other general blunders has weakened their appeal to the public ( in my view.)…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:22:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mikaere Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293186#post293186</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293186#post293186</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>But for that very reason I tend to agree with Craig. I’d be much more interested in an approach to an unpopular policy or piece of legislation that clearly communicated to lay-people the ‘why it sucks’, and ‘how it can be improved’, rather than the blunt instrument of (short-hand) of…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:14:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hilary Stace</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293185#post293185</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293185#post293185</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Did John Key use the term 'political idol' because he could not admit that NZ Labour's got talent or some MPs and not him have the X factor
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:08:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Carol Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293184#post293184</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293184#post293184</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And I thought Brian Edwards' endorsement of Cunliffe as the candidate most likely to strike fear into the hearts of the current government was a reasonable point too.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:07:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mikaere Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293183#post293183</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293183#post293183</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>They have been National in drag for a long time from where I’m sitting.</em></p><p>This is true while they were in power.  Since then, however, they've been all over the Green Party website mashing Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V, so I'm going to give them benefit of: <br />a) the doubt<br />b) the Green…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:05:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>llew40</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293182#post293182</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293182#post293182</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hmmm, I get that JK isn't your cup of tea (nor is he mine), but it seems to me to be a little bit too tribal to imply (and apologies if that was not your intention) that those who voted for him have been 'baffled by bullshit'. I would have…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:59:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293181#post293181</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293181#post293181</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Grant Robertson was the chair. He’s not a neo-liberal.</q><br />A’ight. Obviously got the wrong impression from things I’d read.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:56:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293180#post293180</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293180#post293180</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Matthew, I sat on the Labour Policy Council when we were drafting the current Platform. Grant Robertson was the chair. He's not a neo-liberal.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:52:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293179#post293179</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293179#post293179</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Got to start somewhere. A revision of the 00s' continuation of the 80s is more likely under a leader who supports the apology for the 80s. Robertson is, from what I can gather, an unabashed member of Labour's neolib faction, whereas Cunliffe is much clearer on the significant hurt that…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:47:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>William Wybourne</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293178#post293178</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293178#post293178</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If I could get the on-demand video to play</q></p><p>Russell, if you're like me and have Ghostery (or equivalent) installed, it seems that MTV have their content delivered by Brightcove.com, which is one of the domains on which Ghostery blocks cookies; a surprisingly (and irritatingly) frequent problem for me.  Disabling…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:24:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andre</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293177#post293177</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293177#post293177</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I think they did a great job of not reversing the Richardson benefit cuts and continuing rogernomics under Helen Clark, so an apology for the 80's doesn't really cut it. They have been National in drag for a long time from where I'm sitting.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:21:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293176#post293176</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293176#post293176</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>bewilder-led...</strong><br /><q> ...the Labour leadership contest would be “three weeks of reality TV” and “Political Idol, or whatever you want to call it”...</q><br />Yeah, whatever happened to heading out into the wilderness for 30 or 40 days?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:08:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293174#post293174</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293174#post293174</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Cunliffe seems to have drawn a mark in the sand at least. Shame it’s taken thirty years to reach this point where Labour may represent the working classes again rather than the upper-middle-classes who seem to have been their primary focus over that time.</q></p><p>Labour finally apologised last year for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:48:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293173#post293173</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293173#post293173</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Gee, thank you for the massive Constitutional man-splain there Rich because nobody’s ever amended or repealed legislation in the 23 years I’ve had the vote. The actual correct answer was the one Grant managed to give without the macho dick-waving.</q></p><p>You can disagree on that, then. Rich’s answer wasn’t a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:42:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andre</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293171#post293171</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293171#post293171</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It was nice to hear a Labour politician telling us that they understand that there is growing inequality in NZ (not just inequity), that our youth are being left with no options other than to leave the country, that socialism isn't a swear word and they intend to change course…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:37:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293170#post293170</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293170#post293170</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Basically it comes down to this: do the people of NZ tell multinational companies what to do in our country, or do they tell us what to do? It would be nice to vote on that.</q></p><p>But it is way more complicated than that. Multinationals have as much economic and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:34:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293169#post293169</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293169#post293169</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Come on, stun me with some actual principles you can be held accountable for!</q></p><p>If I didn't know which way you'd party-voted in 2011, I could say something really snarky right now.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:34:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>&quot;chris&quot;</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293168#post293168</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293168#post293168</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2013/05/23/police-couple-stabbed-each-other-over-american-idol/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Police: Couple Stabbed Each Other Over ‘American Idol’</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:33:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hebe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293167#post293167</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293167#post293167</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Basically it comes down to this: do the people of NZ tell multinational companies what to do in our country, or do they tell us what to do? It would be nice to vote on that.</q></p><p>We have: twice. John  got in.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:27:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293166#post293166</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293166#post293166</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Met hasn't been the one talking about being Minister of Finance, which is traditionally given to the DPM.</q></p><p>It has? Going back to to 1949, when we first had a DPM we have had:</p><p>Holyoake (not Minister of Finance)<br />Marshall (not)<br />Skinner (not)<br />Marshall again (not)<br />Muldoon (both DPM and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:25:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293165#post293165</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293165#post293165</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Basically it comes down to this: do the people of NZ tell multinational companies what to do in our country, or do they tell us what to do? It would be nice to vote on that.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:22:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293164#post293164</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293164#post293164</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> That would require co-operation, true power-sharing and mutual respect in public.</q></p><p>Point well made, we can hardly expect politicians to behave like adults it would be just asking too much. Small achievable goals, with a cookie after each.</p><p>"Today minister, you will remember wipe your chin after you dribble."</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:21:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen R</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293163#post293163</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293163#post293163</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Come on, stun me with some actual principles you can be held accountable for!</q></p><p>I agree with this so much.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:21:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>&quot;chris&quot;</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293162#post293162</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293162#post293162</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>it really is PR gold for Labour</q></p><p>Right up until the 'wrong' guy wins, 2 platoons of favourite pickers retreat to the swing fence, as we saw in the last election. But I've got to hand it to y'all, if nothing else, democracy sure is romantic.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:11:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sam M</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293161#post293161</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293161#post293161</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Let's not get too carried away. This is politics we are talking about.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:07:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293160#post293160</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293160#post293160</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The actual correct answer was the one Grant managed to give without the macho dick-waving.</q></p><p>We have constantly heard that no one takes on John Key . That Labour needs a pit bull etc etc. Mr Nice guy didn't work. David Shearer was pilloried. I think the macho dickwaving that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:07:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sam M</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293158#post293158</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293158#post293158</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						So we have to buy our way out of it?  How depressing.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:05:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hebe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293157#post293157</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293157#post293157</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>why not get used to the idea of a co-deputy prime ministership? </q></p><p>Oh my giddy aunt! That would require co-operation, true power-sharing and mutual respect  <em>in public</em>.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:03:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293155#post293155</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293155#post293155</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>“Fuck you” is the correct answer. A parliament cannot bind it’s successor – Key may have purported to do so by signing up for a 30 year contract, but statutes can always void contracts.</q></p><p>Gee, thank you for the massive Constitutional man-splain there Rich because nobody's ever amended or repealed…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:54:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sam M</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293154#post293154</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293154#post293154</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>So far (though I guess to an admittedly casual observer and Cunliffe supporter), Cunliffe is the only one who seems able to emphatically answer hard questions.</p><p>Will you raise taxes? Hell yeah<br />Will you remain bound to the Sky City deal? Parliament is sovereign</p><p>I don't sense the same from…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:52:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293153#post293153</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293153#post293153</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>“Fuck you” is the correct answer. A parliament cannot bind it’s successor – Key may have purported to do so by signing up for a 30 year contract, but statutes can always void contracts.</q></p><p>Which is indeed the longhand version of what Cunliffe said. Key's attempt to bind every government…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:43:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Chris Waugh</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293152#post293152</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293152#post293152</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I never watched this programme you speak of so I will go find it. Did RB link??</q></p><p>There was a link in the original post, and I think somebody embedded a vid upthread.</p><p>And it's odd, but I think John Armstrong does a better job of showing [[http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&amp;objectid=11114787|the differences between the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:40:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293150#post293150</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293150#post293150</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>“Fuck you” is the correct answer. A parliament cannot bind it’s successor – Key may have purported to do so by signing up for a 30 year contract, but statutes can always void contracts.I’m sure this will piss off the labour-voting Sky City shareholders – both of them.</q></p><p>Well said…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:36:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jon J.</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293149#post293149</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293149#post293149</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Regarding the deputy prime ministership, and remembering our malleable constitution, why not get used to the idea of a co-deputy prime ministership? It would see a greening of our constitution and why not, other innovations have already served to indigenise NZ-styled MMP, such as Ministers outside Cabinet, and the world…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:36:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293148#post293148</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293148#post293148</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Sofie, what I meant was that to me they all seemed very much interchangeable.</q></p><p>I think as this proceeds we will spot the differences but we really already know them if one watches the Party. The fact is they all need to convince and win over the public, That is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:34:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293146#post293146</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293146#post293146</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"Fuck you" is the correct answer. A parliament cannot bind it's successor &ndash; Key may have purported to do so by signing up for a 30 year contract, but statutes can always void contracts.</p><p>I'm sure this will piss off the labour-voting Sky City shareholders &ndash; both of them.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:29:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293145#post293145</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293145#post293145</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>There may be a conversation for the Greens to have in that.</q></p><p>Particularly since the thought of Norman as Minister of Finance <em>will</em> encourage some people to vote National just to avoid that happening.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:26:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293144#post293144</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293144#post293144</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I get he’s not actually talking to anyone who doesn’t get a vote in the Labour leadership, but posturing to the base can very quickly become a liability in the campaign</q></p><p>I've already seen other people lament that candidates will stress their left credentials in this process and then tack…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:15:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293143#post293143</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293143#post293143</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Apart from the look on Jones' face, I'm also wondering what he's doing with his hands under the desk.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:13:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293141#post293141</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293141#post293141</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Cunliffe: Fuck ’em.</q></p><p>And that’s where Labour should start saying “fuckity-byes” to Cunliffe.  I get he’s not actually talking to anyone who doesn’t get a vote in the Labour leadership, but posturing to the base can very quickly become a liability in the campaign, let alone in Government where tiresome…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:55:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Chris Waugh</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293139#post293139</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293139#post293139</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Fair point on the Sky City thing. But I would've liked to have seen a bit more of that on the other questions.</p><p>As for endorsing, I've got no problem with them acknowledging each others' strengths, but they're supposed to be campaigning for the leadership. I wanted to see more…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:48:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293138#post293138</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293138#post293138</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So far however it is working like a dream.</p><p>It has had the effect of sucking all the oxygen out from what would have been the spectre of John Key basking in his victory over the powerless communists, civil libertarians and their Twitter Chorus.</q></p><p>Look at [[http://liberation.typepad.com/liberation/2013/08/nz-politics-daily-27-august-2013.html|Bryce Edwards' Politics daily…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:45:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Raymond A Francis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293136#post293136</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293136#post293136</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Good point on Jones although there is the danger that we will discover he is not quite as clever as he thinks he is</p><p>And it may have been a good idea for Jacinda to have thrown her hat into the ring as mentioned  up-thread, first to have a woman…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:42:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293133#post293133</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293133#post293133</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>1: Just what, precisely, is the difference between these three? They all seemed to be saying the exact same thing. They, Robertson especially, also seemed to endorse each other.</q></p><p>They <em>have</em> to endorse each other. That's vital.</p><p>But I thought the answers to the SkyCity question were interesting.</p><p>Jones: Dislike…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:32:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293131#post293131</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293131#post293131</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Because he’s the one who’s put himself out front for a senior role in a coalition, perhaps? Met hasn’t been the one talking about being Minister of Finance, which is traditionally given to the DPM.</q></p><p>Yes, that's why. There may be a conversation for the Greens to have in that.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:28:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Chris Waugh</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293130#post293130</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293130#post293130</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Bart, Sofie, what I meant was that to me they all seemed very much interchangeable. I certainly didn't want to see them attacking each other in any way, and yeah, they should be pushing the same Labour policies, of course, but to me none of them really stood out as…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:28:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293129#post293129</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293129#post293129</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>why Russell for Deputy PM and not Meteira?</q></p><p>Because he's the one who's put himself out front for a senior role in a coalition, perhaps? Met hasn't been the one talking about being Minister of Finance, which is traditionally given to the DPM.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:23:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>HORansome</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293125#post293125</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293125#post293125</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Just one nitpick: why Russell for Deputy PM and not Meteira?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:19:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293121#post293121</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293121#post293121</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>1: Just what, precisely, is the difference between these three? They all seemed to be saying the exact same thing. They, Robertson especially, also seemed to endorse each other.</q></p><p>The difference is the public get a say. If you are a member you get a vote. With 3 very distinct…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:12:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293119#post293119</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293119#post293119</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Just what, precisely, is the difference between these three? They all seemed to be saying the exact same thing. They, Robertson especially, also seemed to endorse each other.</q></p><p>I don't think the aim of this exercise is to show any of them as bad choices. Quite the reverse, the aim…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:09:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293117#post293117</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293117#post293117</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Whatever the actual content and whether we (the public) get to know the new leader more seems almost irrelevant. This process will dominate the news. Providing none of the candidates say anything remarkably more stupid than usual it really is PR gold for Labour.</p><p>Key's response highlights how pissed off…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:02:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293116#post293116</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293116#post293116</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Played fine for me, too – how’s this?</q></p><p>Brilliant. Thank you.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:01:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293114#post293114</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293114#post293114</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Amazingly enough, that video played perfectly for me. And that was a nice moment, especially the looks on Shane’s and David’s faces.</q></p><p>Exactly.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:59:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jonathan Ibell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293112#post293112</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293112#post293112</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Played fine for me, too &ndash; how's this?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:56:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293110#post293110</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293110#post293110</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Hum… I might have to watch it a couple more times, but the whole exercise struck me as more insubstantial than Forbes and Native Affairs usually is.</q></p><p>I confess, I was watching more for style than content. Although the different flavours of answer to the SkyCity question were interesting.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:52:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>The Ruminator</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293108#post293108</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293108#post293108</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Those operatic political speeches really elevate political satire to a cultural high point don't they?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:51:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Chris Waugh</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293107#post293107</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293107#post293107</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If I could get the on-demand video to play, I'd grab a still of Uncle Grant reaching out and fraternally touching both his rivals.</q></p><p>Amazingly enough, that video played perfectly for me. And that was a nice moment, especially the looks on Shane's and David's faces. I also liked how…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:50:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293106#post293106</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293106#post293106</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Apparently, calling the Cunliffe for Leader twitter account “idiotic” means you’re endorsing Cunliffe</q></p><p>Yeah, it's definitely a troll account. And read that way, less idiotic. It might turn out to be entertaining.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:49:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293105#post293105</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293105#post293105</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the Native Affairs version. It was interesting.</q></p><p>Hum... I might have to watch it a couple more times, but the whole exercise struck me as more insubstantial than Forbes and <em>Native Affairs</em> usually is. All three of them got their talking points out and bunted the softballs lobbed in their…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:49:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alastair Thompson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293103#post293103</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293103#post293103</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Nicely said Russell. This was my thought when the decision was first taken, and I wondered which genius at the Labour Party was responsible for the timing &ndash; the morning after the GCSB Bill passed. </p><p>Unconventional politics, perhaps. But dramatic!</p><p>And potentially high risk.</p><p>So far however it is working…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:46:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Dave Patrick</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293100#post293100</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293100#post293100</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Apparently, calling the Cunliffe for Leader twitter account "idiotic" means you're endorsing Cunliffe
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:43:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293099#post293099</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293099#post293099</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yay. And now David Cunliffe's announcement gets the opera treatment:</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwKIFwCWFMI" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwKIFwCWFMI</a></p><p>Still better, this amazing Game of Thrones-themed Australian election campaign rap featuring Julian Assange. Yes, you did read that right:</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWU6tVxzO1I&amp;t=64" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWU6tVxzO1I&amp;t=64</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:43:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293095#post293095</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293095#post293095</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>a little less with that thing </q></p><p>You mean the slave labour fishing boats, or the wanting to dig up Northland?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:24:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293094#post293094</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-political-idol-or-whatever-you/?p=293094#post293094</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:24:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
