<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Hard News: Photoshocks</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Sj</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282434#post282434</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282434#post282434</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>who killed her is the more important detail than who she was</q><br />This can never be true.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:03:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282174#post282174</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282174#post282174</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I still think those are some fantastic shots. I guess astrophotography is pretty much screwed on those rules, the shot averaging being vital. Mind you, that's what the hardware is doing in an interpolated zoom...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 12:40:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Euan Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282165#post282165</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282165#post282165</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I cited the disqualified winner of the 2012 National Geographic Photo Contest</q></p><p>National Geographic has an interesting policy and an understandable aversion to image manipulation that creates unreal images, but I think it has to change somewhat.  NG bought and published <a href="http://www.treesandstars.com/euan/astronomy/CometMcNaught.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this image</a> which is as it came out of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 11:49:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282104#post282104</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282104#post282104</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>There is a benefit to getting the "news" from radio..</p><p>The Time cover makes me "uncomfortable" &ndash; an illustration of how tabloid and low print media has sunk.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 22:21:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282101#post282101</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282101#post282101</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It's interesting to speculate how much of the killer-cyborg vibe is context. The pic, by Peiter Hugo, originally appeared in the New York Times last year to, it seems, no controversy at all.</q><br />It's certainly interesting how the image gained a whole new life once the context changed. Its original…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 22:06:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Aston</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282099#post282099</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282099#post282099</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It’s really hard work to think past a made-up and photographed celebrity on the side of a bus-shelter</q></p><p>Even harder thinking past a made up and well presented ideology . I think the image thing is the tip of the iceberg in terms of the attempts to manipulate our minds.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 19:32:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Aston</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282098#post282098</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282098#post282098</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Not quite all ... the New York tabloids followed the Sun's lead pretty closely too.</q></p><p>Oh god I despair , its even worse</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 19:08:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282097#post282097</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282097#post282097</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q><br />An audience that’s a lot more sophisticated (and cynical, both for better and worse) that it used to be.<br /></q></p><p>People say that. I don't believe them. Our brains operate on a base pattern-dependent level, and going up and beyond that takes work, and requires deliberate engagement. Being informed protects you…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 17:43:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282096#post282096</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282096#post282096</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I was talking to a university class the other day (among other things) about photo adjustment with computers, and how you need to be very careful about what is an acceptable level of manipulation to your audience.</q></p><p>An audience that’s a lot more sophisticated (and cynical, both for better and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 16:43:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282095#post282095</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282095#post282095</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I was talking to a university class the other day (among other things) about photo adjustment with computers, and how you need to be very careful about what is an acceptable level of manipulation to your audience.<br />I cited the <a href="http://www.petapixel.com/2013/01/10/crop-dont-shop-how-one-photog-has-winning-nat-geo-contest-photo-dqed/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">disqualified winner</a> of the 2012 National Geographic Photo Contest.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 16:25:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282092#post282092</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282092#post282092</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I think this talks to a really interesting piece of psychology. I remember during the ‘teapot’ scandal with Banks and Key how the media started publishing stories about the Government – and Key – with really unflattering images of our Prime Minister. Shadowy, looking tired etc.</q></p><p>During the PAS thread…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 14:47:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282090#post282090</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282090#post282090</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Yeah what the hell is happening when the (alleged) murderer gets all the media space including glossy , sexy even, pics .</q></p><p>Not quite all ... the New York tabloids followed the Sun's lead pretty closely too.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 14:25:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Cormack</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282088#post282088</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282088#post282088</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I think this talks to a really interesting piece of psychology. I remember during the 'teapot' scandal with Banks and Key how the media started publishing stories about the Government &ndash; and Key &ndash; with really unflattering images of our Prime Minister. Shadowy, looking tired etc.</p><p>The way the image…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 14:09:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282087#post282087</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282087#post282087</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It’s interesting to speculate how much of the killer-cyborg vibe is context. </q></p><p>A hell of a lot, I'd say.  If they'd cropped the bottom of that O.J. Simpson mug-shot, it would have been pretty much indistinguishable from a million pretty anodyne 'candid' photos of Simpson taken over the years.  IIRC…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 14:05:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Aston</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282086#post282086</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282086#post282086</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And like so such of the Pistorious porn, the most interesting thing is what’s not there: Reeva Steenkamp – not “Pistorious’ girlfriend.” You know, the woman that “superman gunman” shot to death.</q><br />+1 Craig <br />Yeah what the hell is happening when the (alleged) murderer gets all the media space including…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 14:01:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Morgan Nichol</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282085#post282085</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282085#post282085</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						For everyone in the world that didn't know her, who killed her is the more important detail than who she was. Arguing otherwise seems futile. If she'd been killed in a car crash, or murdered by some unknown scumbag, we'd never have heard about her passing at all, named or…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 13:57:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282083#post282083</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282083#post282083</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Bag News on the Pistorius cover.</q></p><p>It's interesting to speculate how much of the killer-cyborg vibe is context. The pic, by Peiter Hugo, originally appeared in the New York Times last year to, it seems, no controversy at all.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 13:43:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282082#post282082</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282082#post282082</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://www.bagnewsnotes.com/2013/03/pistorius-freak-science-meets-sci-fi/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bag News</a> on the Pistorius cover.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 13:34:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282080#post282080</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282080#post282080</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Blade runner and murder accused Oscar Pistorius made the cover of Time magazine last week, if for all the wrong reasons</q></p><p>And like so such of the Pistorious porn, the most interesting thing is what’s <em>not</em> there:  **Reeva Steenkamp – not “Pistorious’ girlfriend.” You know, the woman that “superman gunman”…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 13:14:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Chris Waugh</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282077#post282077</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282077#post282077</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks for posting this Russell. You've very indirectly touched on an aspect of Western media coverage of China, especially in imagery, that tends to bug me at this time of year, and how that imagery is used to reinforce certain predetermined narratives.</p><p>I especially like the Wired cover. Very arresting.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 11:40:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282076#post282076</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-photoshocks/?p=282076#post282076</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 11:40:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
