<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Hard News: No Bills</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=24225#post24225</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=24225#post24225</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>A bit too soon to be dusting off the Cromwell quote, but still good for a giggle, as novice leader learns Media Lesson One: the tape recorder is not your friend.</p></blockquote><p>That's astonishing. The man's a fool. Either that or too spineless to exercise authority over his senior MPs.</p><p>I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 16:47:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>simon g</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=24223#post24223</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=24223#post24223</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>As we know, what finally did for old B-P was not misleading the PM or the public or even Sean Plunket, but taking on the might of Audrey Young. There are some things up with which we will not put.</p><p>So John Key is in trouble on this one ...…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 16:23:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23764#post23764</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23764#post23764</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA0707/S00394.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Apparently</a> Gordon Copeland has only just realised what Annette King has been saying about him and put out a press release denying it.</p><blockquote><p>"I did agree to consider such a proposal &ndash; in fact I made such a proposal to Annette King &ndash; but in the end made a firm…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:50:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23187#post23187</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23187#post23187</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I am always very impressed when the likes of David Farrar and Idiot Savant demonstrate just how easy it is to participate and get your ideas a hearing, particularly if they are well thought out and presented.</p></blockquote><p>Indeed, Don &ndash; and if you're not going to use the participatory mechanisms…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:21:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23179#post23179</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23179#post23179</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>That's one of the worst ideas I've ever heard.</p></blockquote><p>Correct. This is a governance issues. Essentially we are shareholders in NZ with 1 voting share each. Every three years we get to change the board. </p><p>We really don't have the time or knowledge to deal with the minutia of the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 09:04:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Scott Common</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23178#post23178</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23178#post23178</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>That's one of the worst ideas I've ever heard.</p></blockquote><p>Where as I find the idea of a full participatory democracy to be what we should be aiming for. We're a small enough country to actually manage the numbers but there are a few things which would need to be sorted…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:24:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>stephen walker</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23173#post23173</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23173#post23173</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>How about a larger bureaucracy, minimum elected reps, &amp; all votes by referendum? A true Democracy, power directly to the people. The bureaucracy would be there to inform the public on the issues to be voted on.</p></blockquote><p>and what would you have in lieu of select committees and public submissions to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 00:33:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23172#post23172</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23172#post23172</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>How about a larger bureaucracy, minimum elected reps, &amp; all votes by referendum? A true Democracy, power directly to the people. The bureaucracy would be there to inform the public on the issues to be voted on.</p></blockquote><p>That's one of the worst ideas I've ever heard.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 23:30:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael  Fitzgerald</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23171#post23171</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23171#post23171</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Fairfax would have you believe they are the voice of the people. </p><p>We might just find they rep the motivated minority. </p><p>Why trust people to vote for Bozo the Clown but not directly on the issues?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 23:03:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>81stcolumn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23170#post23170</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23170#post23170</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Surely govt by referendum = govt by Fairfax in NZ?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 22:50:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael  Fitzgerald</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23168#post23168</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23168#post23168</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Paula <br />Party politics is at best a compromise and at worst corruption.<br />Your point on the Greens is exactly my issue. <br />It's about making the best of a bad thing. There is no good option. </p><p>Rich<br />Dilute, I would rather wash Politians clean away.<br />How about a larger bureaucracy, minimum…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 21:07:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23164#post23164</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23164#post23164</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Parliamentary democracy works largely because of accountability. If the government doesn't have a set of policies that work reasonably well for a majority of electors, it will lose the next election. If it's policies work, then it will probably stay in. The electorate don't need to have a view on…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 18:56:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>paulalambert</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23162#post23162</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23162#post23162</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Depends on whether you're with the majority I guess.  Am not confident that 'maturity of reasoning and understanding'  is common.   Denigration of the Greens' drug policy, for instance  :)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:04:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael  Fitzgerald</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23161#post23161</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23161#post23161</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Why would referendum result in Democracy being thrown to the wolves, ripped apart and savaged? <br />Ultimately itwill require a maturity of reasoning and understanding from which society will grow.<br />Even if savaged, is that any worse than our current system?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:42:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>paulalambert</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23160#post23160</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23160#post23160</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Isn't social justice kind of the opposite of majority rule ?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:25:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael  Fitzgerald</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23158#post23158</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23158#post23158</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>That's the Green dilemma &ndash; They're more than just Green but it's hard to market Social Justice (which for all my bitching I might vote for them this time &ndash; might see what Jimbo has to offer &ndash; I can't remember the name of his party).</p><p>Is there any movement…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:06:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sue</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23150#post23150</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23150#post23150</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I'm with Rich<br />i know a pile of people who voted green to slide labour away from the right. </p><p>Just like a i know a pile who vote ACT to slide National away from the left</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:24:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23147#post23147</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23147#post23147</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>My belief is folks are voting Green essentially for Greenness, not for the sideshow agenda's that Kedgley and co. seem so keen on chucking out</em></p><p>I didn't &ndash; I voted Green because, in short, they're the only electable party on the liberal/left side of Labour. I agree with about 75%…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:53:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>InternationalObserver</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23137#post23137</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23137#post23137</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						By definition, you can't car-pool on your own.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:55:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23135#post23135</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23135#post23135</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'm not saying there is a connection, but Sue Bradford's use of the Green Party as her personal vehicle is not the kind of carpooling that we should be encouraging.</p></blockquote><p>I don't buy that. At least she's not passing laws which benefit herself, and/or her friends/business colleagues. Not all MPs…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:47:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23131#post23131</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23131#post23131</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'm not sure I'm thrilled with a regulatory body which would likely be dominated by a country who sold it's independence in medical matters ...</p></blockquote><p>I know what you're saying, but I really don't think the point should be overplayed. We already operate joint food standards with Australia, and that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:47:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>InternationalObserver</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23129#post23129</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23129#post23129</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>perhaps we could discuss how Labour have ended up with Dunne's Future and Winston First, after all.</em></p><p>Er, could it be that Labour knows it can rely on the Greens when the chips are down? And it can almost rely on the Maori Party too?  Perhaps I've watched too many…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:16:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>rodgerd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23127#post23127</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23127#post23127</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>There seems to be a "They shouldn't be worried about that <insert topic>" meme that surrounds the Greens whenever there's some kind of policy win.</p></blockquote><p>After the last election there was some commentary to the effect that National was failing in MMP because various people in key positions (McCulley, Bassett, et…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 08:51:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23126#post23126</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23126#post23126</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The risk is that New Zealand will end up paying for "Monkey Smeg" and stuff that works until we figure out the difference.</p></blockquote><p>Certainly, 81stcolumn, and I didn't mean to come across as being glib about the real hucksters and snake oil salesmen who are out there preying on desperate…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 06:26:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>81stcolumn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23125#post23125</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23125#post23125</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>There is no such thing as alternative medicine, there is medicine that works and medicine that doesn't. If it works, it incorporated in medicine. If it doesn't, its called quackery, and Alison Rowe has some for you to buy. Unlabelled.</p></blockquote><p>Oh if only........</p><p>CAM (Complimentary and Alternative Medicine) is the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 01:50:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael  Fitzgerald</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23123#post23123</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23123#post23123</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						If it's mischevous to link various drug use and outcomes regardless of leagal status, and cherry pick quotes (seemingly) not based on studies, sure. But haven't I just described the site?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 00:31:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>InternationalObserver</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23122#post23122</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23122#post23122</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>Is this the Greens answer to P as well?</em></p><p>Not according to the website you linked to, but then you knew that, you were just being mischevous ...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 00:17:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23120#post23120</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23120#post23120</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I was chatting with a charming and attractive bio-chemistry PhD candidate at a dinner party a couple of years ago.  Her thesis was on the neuro-toxicity of recreational drugs.  She told me that P kills brain cells at a uniquely alarming rate, and that the resulting damage was severe and…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 23:05:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael  Fitzgerald</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23119#post23119</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23119#post23119</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Weston<br />My fave Greens are Bradford &amp; Locke &ndash; they tend to walk a little more of their talk than 'my shit doesn't stink' Jeanette.</p><p>Is this the Greens answer to P as well?<br />Prohibition isn’t protecting our kids.<br /><a href="http://www.greens.org.nz/searchdocs/other6572.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.greens.org.nz/searchdocs/other6572.html</a></p><p>Brough to you by Jeanette, Nandor, &amp; Sue K</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:02:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Eleanor</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23118#post23118</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23118#post23118</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Eleanor, I'm very sure I'd have felt differently if you'd been fronting the campaign rather than Christine Rankin and Sue Kedgley. I actually learned something from your contributions, and adjusted my view accordingly.</p></blockquote><p>That's all I could ask! :o)</p><p>Now that pesky Bill is dormant, I'm going to take a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:51:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>stephen walker</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23117#post23117</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23117#post23117</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>faux philosophy of science bollox</p></blockquote><p>come on kowhai, truth is science and science is truth. get with the program!</p><p>なんちゃって。</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:45:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23116#post23116</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23116#post23116</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I like Jeanette Fitzsimmons.  I think she is kinda neat.  Unlike <em>some</em> Green Party MP's I can think of.</p><p>You can learn more about Jeanette here:<br /><a href="http://www.greens.org.nz/people/fitzsimons_j.asp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.greens.org.nz/people/fitzsimons_j.asp</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:21:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23114#post23114</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23114#post23114</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"...openly discusses integration of Alternative Medicine/Therapy with mainstream health"</p><p>There is no such thing as alternative medicine, there is medicine that works and medicine that doesn't. If it works, it incorporated in medicine. If it doesn't, its called quackery, and Alison Rowe has some for you to buy. Unlabelled.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:14:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>81stcolumn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23113#post23113</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23113#post23113</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Well I guess I ought to out myself on this one &ndash; What bothers me is that the advisory from which current MACCAH guidelines are drawn, openly discusses integration of Alternative Medicine/Therapy with mainstream health.  At the same time it acknowldges the difficulties and present problems associated with figuring out…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:06:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>kmont</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23112#post23112</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23112#post23112</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Damn you Russell!  I went and read 8 pages of comments from the last time you wrote about this.  It was interesting as hell (except for the faux philosophy of science bollox, I skimmed over that).  This is the kind of debate we should be having in NZ, as a…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:56:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23110#post23110</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23110#post23110</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>No I don't want to start a conventional vs. alternative argument here.</p></blockquote><p>Well, I don't either &ndash; because, on level, it comes down to a similar place for me as the whole party pill debate.  If you're really chuffed at the thought of ingesting powdered monkey smeg or drain clearer…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:49:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>81stcolumn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23109#post23109</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23109#post23109</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Awwww s**T one of the consequences of having script stopping software on my browser is preview doesn't work.......unedited nonsense warning.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:30:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>81stcolumn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23108#post23108</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23108#post23108</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><qoute> So it is essentially about managing risk in a prudent manner.</p></blockquote><br /><br />Agreed<br /><br />But why given the proposal of a ban for GM would the Greens opt for <em>any</em> form a regulation with respect to a sector that also suffers an extraordinary lack of evidence ? The growth with respect to…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:28:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>stephen walker</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23107#post23107</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23107#post23107</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>the Green's basic hypocrisy over this issue. The line for GM was don't use until proven safe as far as I can gather.</p></blockquote><p>I'm not trying to defend an <em>apparent</em> hypocracy, but (hahaha, I knew you'd like that "but")...</p><p>the GE debate concerned the potential release of novel organisms into…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:51:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>81stcolumn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23105#post23105</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23105#post23105</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Mmmm I still can’t drag my thoughts away from the Green’s basic hypocrisy over this issue.  The line for GM was don’t use until proven safe as far as I can gather.  I’m with Bart on this; if the same rules were to be applied to Therapeutic Products and Medicines…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:01:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23104#post23104</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23104#post23104</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I just don't think that's fair Russell. Researching and interpreting this bill was all-consuming. Have you read it yet?</p></blockquote><p>Eleanor, I'm very sure I'd have felt differently if you'd been fronting the campaign rather than Christine Rankin and Sue Kedgley. I actually <em>learned something</em> from your contributions, and adjusted my…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:47:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Eleanor</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23103#post23103</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23103#post23103</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I think it's partially the way the campaign was waged &ndash; basically the approach was to bag the Bill and generate support for defeating it rather than promote a better alternative.</p><p>Exactly. It was wholly destructive, hysterical and contradictory.</p></blockquote><p>I just don't think that's fair Russell. Researching and interpreting this…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:43:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23102#post23102</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23102#post23102</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I suppose this is one of the reasons that I desperately want the Greens to be part of the government &ndash; to move them out of opposition, where FUD is a constant temptation, and into a role where they can sink their teeth into some proactive policy delivery.</p></blockquote><p>I should…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:43:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23101#post23101</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23101#post23101</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>This speech on vaccination she gave in 2004 gives me the creeps.</p></blockquote><p>Yep, <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/4130951a11.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">thanks Sue for helping</a>.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:35:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mikaere Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23100#post23100</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23100#post23100</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>This speech on vaccination she gave in 2004 gives me the creeps. She chucks in any old fear she can lay her hands on, including claims that are specifically debunked by our own Ministry of Health. I think it's reckless.</p></blockquote><p>I suppose this is one of the reasons that I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:33:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23099#post23099</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23099#post23099</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hang in there Kowhai. We had <a href="http://publicaddress.net/default,4235.sm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">a pretty good discussion</a> about the issue last time I wrote about it.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:27:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Jenkins</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23098#post23098</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23098#post23098</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I think it's partially the way the campaign was waged &ndash; basically the approach was to bag the Bill and generate support for defeating it rather than promote a better alternative.</p></blockquote><p>I think that goes for both sides of the debate, as presented by the media &ndash; on the one…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:20:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>kmont</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23097#post23097</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23097#post23097</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Well the discussion got all interesting.  I guess it is fun to participate rather that lurk.  I probably <strong>am</strong> somewhat politically naive, more likely to be reading a novel than a political press release................</p><p>Interesting perspective Don.  Food for thought.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:15:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23095#post23095</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23095#post23095</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I think it's partially the way the campaign was waged &ndash; basically the approach was to bag the Bill and generate support for defeating it rather than promote a better alternative.</p></blockquote><p>Exactly. It was wholly destructive, hysterical and contradictory. Kedgley's repeated invocation of the US FDA's model as some sort…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:09:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mikaere Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23093#post23093</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23093#post23093</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>You can't be pure as the driven snow and put out that sort of shit at the same time.</p></blockquote><p>Hence my comment about it being akin to a gloat-a-thon.  There's no need for these kind of media releases, especially when Morning Report are doing a nice job of it for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:02:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23092#post23092</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23092#post23092</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>& I think that may be one problem the Greens have &ndash; the hippie element have more time & resources to invest in party politics, or at least are more willing to make it a priority. I wouldn't be surprised if there's a silent (perhaps narrow) majority in the party's support that…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:57:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Heather Gaye</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23091#post23091</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23091#post23091</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I think Sue could have more successfully promoted the fact that the Greens were pro-regulation. "Anti-Bill" could be conflated with "anti-regulation", as is quite plainly demonstrated on this forum.</p></blockquote><p>Yes.  The rhetoric I heard was of the "stop attacking our enlightened naturopaths!" variety.  Granted, considering the fine state of MSM…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:53:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23090#post23090</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23090#post23090</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Maybe that makes me politically naive but I can live with that.</p></blockquote><p>It really depends on what you think the main agenda should be. If it is anti-smacking, the right to sell quack medicines, votes for 16 year olds, repeal of the foreshore legislation, anti-vaccination then you are certainly not…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:52:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mikaere Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23089#post23089</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23089#post23089</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>That, folks, is in one sentence why everyone finds the Greens, more than anything else, just plain irritating.</p></blockquote><p>I hereby invite you to use your power of Omniscient Generalisation for Good and not Evil by joining the Greens to help us lower our Irritation Factor.</p><p>Or maybe we'll just get…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:48:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>stephen walker</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23088#post23088</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23088#post23088</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I totally agree with Mikaere's two posts.</p><p>and all the ad hom attacks on Kedgley are really boring and pointless. does anyone want to provide non-urban-legend evidence re: Kedgley and water?<br />(an email reply <em>apparaently</em> from someone in Kedgley's office saying: "I know Sue would be absolutely supportive of the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:45:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>kmont</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23087#post23087</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23087#post23087</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The point isn't that the Greens are wrong, the point is where they and their supporters and potential supporters want to spend political capital. That's not a bottomless bucket.</p></blockquote><p>Well I suppose you do have a point about spending political capital, it might not be the best thing strategically.  I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:37:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mikaere Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23086#post23086</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23086#post23086</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I am interested to know why people who generally support the greens have a parting of ways on this issue.</p></blockquote><p>I think it's partially the way the campaign was waged &ndash; basically the approach was to bag the Bill and generate support for defeating it rather than promote a better…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:30:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23085#post23085</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23085#post23085</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"Ensure Aotearoa/New Zealand retains regulatory control of the dietary supplements industry and does not proceed with government plans for restrictive trans-Tasman regulation of dietary supplements."</p><p>Wow, an annoyingly smug politically correct sentence (Aotearoa/New Zealand) that manages to also contain xenophobia (restrictive trans-Tasman), and a dissembling use of language (dietary supplements)…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:23:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23084#post23084</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23084#post23084</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Watching some Labour luvvies get apoplectic over the fact that the Greens have got spine, principle and the numbers is really quite entertaining, but it's time to inject some facts into your jaded diatribes.</p></blockquote><p>Didn't notice much apoplexy on the list. Disappointment in Green's political management maybe. </p><p>The fact is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:23:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael Stevens</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23083#post23083</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23083#post23083</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Is it because Sue Kedgely is off-putting?</p><p>No, it's because she's stark raving bonkers. But she's not the only one in the House, so she feels at home there.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:20:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>kmont</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23080#post23080</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23080#post23080</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks for that Mikaere, those details were informative.  I don't follow politics that closely but I though that the greens had been fairly consistant on this one.  I don't see how it is a "hippie thing" to want to retain control over regulations.  I am interested to know why people…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:14:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nic.wise</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23079#post23079</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23079#post23079</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>So, via hysteria on the one hand (and yes I do think that's a fair description of some of Kedgley's rhetoric)</p></blockquote><p>Does she ever do anything ELSE?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:04:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mikaere Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23078#post23078</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23078#post23078</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Watching some Labour luvvies get apoplectic over the fact that the Greens have got spine, principle <em>and</em>  the numbers is really quite entertaining, but it's time to inject some facts into your jaded diatribes.</p><p>Sure, the Bill would have imposed order on what is presently the Wild West.  No arguments…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:02:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23077#post23077</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23077#post23077</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Will you also be the first to record your own satirical voiceover to such video?</p></blockquote><p>Don't you dare. The last thing I need is a reason to watch Parliament.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:54:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nat Torkington</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23076#post23076</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23076#post23076</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Anyone going to archive the footage?  If nobody else will take it, I'm sure the Internet Archive folks will save a copy if you upload it.  Failing that, I bet the CityLink people would be approachable ...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:53:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>kmont</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23075#post23075</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23075#post23075</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I hope so</p><p>Live dangerously</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:50:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23074#post23074</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23074#post23074</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I believe I am the first blogger to capture and re-use video from the Parliamentary webcast</p></blockquote><p>Will you also be the first to record your own satirical voiceover to such video?</p><p>=)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:48:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Beard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23073#post23073</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23073#post23073</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>"I guess I count myself as an "urban techno-greenie" . . ."</p><p>Sounds like what's known in Australia as a plastic wombat.</p></blockquote><p>That's not a phrase I've come across before. I think I get the vague gist of it (perhaps implying a level of hypocrisy), but would you care to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:46:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23072#post23072</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23072#post23072</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I believe I am the first blogger to capture and re-use video from the Parliamentary webcast that launched this afternoon</p><p>Now in <a href="http://publicaddress.net/system/topic,584,your_tax_dollars_at_work_parliament_tv.sm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">OurTube</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:37:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>kmont</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23069#post23069</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23069#post23069</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I would be interested to hear people's opinions on the bill itself.  I think it was flawed and I am pleased it didn't go through.</p><p>A regulatory overhaul would be good but I don't think this was it.</p><p>Maybe I am missing something.......<br />I am really interested in what people…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:33:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Heather Gaye</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23067#post23067</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23067#post23067</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And if you're right, and the Green Party leadership are that far out of touch with their own membership and support...</p></blockquote><p>I suspect there's truth in what Don's saying.  I'm of Tom Beard's ilk, &amp; I'm a card-carrying member of the Greens.  I'm gradually getting pretty pissed off with both Sues'…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:23:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nat Torkington</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23066#post23066</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23066#post23066</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'm personally more concerned that Key does have an agenda, he just won't say what it is. If he doesn't, and is happy to leave it to watching the polls, great.</p></blockquote><p>Hear hear, Ben.  If there's one thing I learned from Nicky Hagar's book (other than the risks of broad…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:22:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Leigh Kennaway</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23065#post23065</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23065#post23065</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>Then again, your mileage may vary on whether the editorial board of the New Zealand Herald are people you'd trust to organise a gang-bang at a sex-addicts convention.</em></p><p>Actually I think that was Steve Crow's plans, for the official launch of his Mayoral campaign at <em>Erotica</em></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:17:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>81stcolumn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23064#post23064</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23064#post23064</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Okay &ndash; Heres one for the paranoia crew.  Unregulated supplements are amongst the things most likely to get a Kiwi athlete busted in drugs testing.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:14:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23061#post23061</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23061#post23061</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>All you seem to want to say is that politicians are equally snide, snippy and hypocritical.</p></blockquote><p>Um, no &ndash; because I'm not really interested in being that glibly cynical.  And if you're right, and the Green Party leadership are that far out of touch with their own membership and support,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:52:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23060#post23060</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23060#post23060</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Craig, I never said what Labour did wasn't in its own interest.</p><p>I am not sure what your points are actually as you haven't addressed any mine. All you seem to want to say is that politicians are equally snide, snippy and hypocritical. </p><p>Er, so what?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:42:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23059#post23059</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23059#post23059</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I guess I count myself as an "urban techno-greenie" . . .</p></blockquote><p>Sounds like what's known in Australia as a plastic wombat.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:37:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23058#post23058</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23058#post23058</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Now, back to the Greens. Aside from the rash of contradictions in their various stances, those with not such short memories will recall that during the last election they were polling below 5% and that until HC gave them a helpful nudge it looked as though there would be no…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:27:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23057#post23057</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23057#post23057</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The new Parliamentary webcast is up and running here:</p><p><a href="http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/Visiting/LiveBroadcast/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/Visiting/LiveBroadcast/</a></p><p>The QuickTime stream comes through in the wrong aspect ratio and the audio is very quiet.</p><p>Viewed with the Flip4Mac Windows Media components the Windows Media stream looks gorgeous. The audio drifted out of sync but pausing then restarting the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:18:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23055#post23055</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23055#post23055</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks for the lecture on MMP Craig. I consider myself reasonably acquainted with the system and its implications.</p><p>Now, back to the Greens. Aside from the rash of contradictions in their various stances, those with not such short memories will recall that during the last election they were polling below…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:05:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23054#post23054</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23054#post23054</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>You can't tell me that headline wasn't chosen deliberately.</p></blockquote><p>Certainly not, Tom.  Then again, your mileage may vary on whether the editorial board of the <em>New Zealand Herald</em> are people you'd trust to  organise a gang-bang at a sex-addicts convention.  Got to say this morning's editorial <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/466/story.cfm?c_id=466&amp;objectid=10451878" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">on the one city chestnut</a>…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:04:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23053#post23053</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23053#post23053</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It is this kind of thing that makes me despair of party politics, when what I really want to vote for is a little of this and a smidgen of that and a mixed assortment of those things.</p></blockquote><p>I think representative democracy is more to blame, and parties are just…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:01:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23052#post23052</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23052#post23052</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yes &ndash; but there is a difference with being seen as being on the side of the people and being seen as an vacillating big ball of nothing, which is what Key is in danger of being seen with all his U-turns. A classic example of this is the headline…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:53:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23051#post23051</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23051#post23051</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Apropos the Greens: they're a coalition of disparate interests just like the other parties. Unfortunately, the romantic and irrational anti-science constituency is one of the more powerful interests in that coalition.</p><p>I'm afraid the Green's commitment to science and technology is only utilitarian when it comes to argument &mdash; they…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:53:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23048#post23048</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23048#post23048</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I think what you really mean is that Key and his party are seen as a joke by people who are never ever going to vote for them anyway &ndash; probably not something their strategy advisers lose much sleep over.</p></blockquote><p>Certainly not.  Just as I don't think Helen Clark has…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:38:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23047#post23047</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23047#post23047</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I think there is a developing theme that Key will U turn at the whiff of a bad focus group.</p></blockquote><p>That might be one of the good things about him. It's only something to sledge National for because they *pretend otherwise*. They like to project the idea of strong decisive…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:31:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23046#post23046</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23046#post23046</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I see Cullen is emphatically claiming that Key and Tim Groser came to Labour looking for a compromise because of their concern about the impact on relations with Australia if the bill tanked &mdash; but Ryall sank it.</p></blockquote><p>LOL... Well, to get all Mandy Rice Davies for a moment, he…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:27:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Terence Wood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23045#post23045</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23045#post23045</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Sigh, Sue &ndash; 'first they came to micro-chip my dogs' &ndash; Kedgely; I think the Greens just lost my vote.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:25:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23043#post23043</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23043#post23043</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Danyl &ndash; No, what I am saying is the main T.V. media outlets in particular like to run their political stories with an underlying theme &ndash; "tired third term government" or "Brash's constant gaffes'" or &ndash; most relevant here &ndash; "John Key, the next big thing." I am not saying…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:21:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23042#post23042</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23042#post23042</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p><em>Has anyone heard a broadcast journalist put that contradiction to Sue Kedgley?</em></p><p>NO, and this is what I've found most irritating with regard to media coverage on this issue (with yourself a notable exception, Russell)</p></blockquote><p>Actually, I remembered that I did put that question to Jeanette Fitzsimons <em>way</em> back when…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:20:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23041#post23041</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23041#post23041</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Yeah, but if the polls are driven by the news media's compliant reporting of Kedgley and Rankin's conspiracy theories, don't we have a problem here?</p></blockquote><p>Perhaps. That's a big IF though. If polls had real direct power, people might be more careful what they said to them.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:16:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sarah Flynn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23040#post23040</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23040#post23040</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Has anyone heard a broadcast journalist put that contradiction to Sue Kedgley?</p></blockquote><p>NO, and this is what I've found most irritating with regard to media coverage on this issue (with yourself a notable exception, Russell) &ndash; plenty of airtime has been given to the opponents of the bill (and I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:15:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23039#post23039</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23039#post23039</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						BTW and royally off-topic, I've just added to the podcast <a href="http://publicaddress.net/system/topic,582,pa_radio_james_griffin_on_outrageous_fortunes_third_season.sm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">our interview with James Griffin</a> about the third season of <em>Outrageous Fortune</em>, which begins tonight. Swipe some of the boss's bandwidth and have a listen ...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:14:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Scott Common</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23037#post23037</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23037#post23037</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And let's not forget this is the woman who wanted to ban DHMO, dihydrogen monoxide. She's a well-meaning fool.</p></blockquote><p>Hehehe &ndash; I still get the odd person calling me at work wanting to know why we haven't banned this terrible substance &ndash; they're usually all up in arms and are…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:10:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danyl Mclauchlan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23035#post23035</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23035#post23035</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Key's inability to take a policy position on anything is starting to cause that most fatal of political consequences &ndash; being taken as a joke.</p></blockquote><p>You might be deep into 'nobody I know voted for Nixon' territory here. Key and his party are still wildly popular suggesting that their rather…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:08:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Beard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23034#post23034</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23034#post23034</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Quite so. The Greens' stand on GMOs was that they had to be "proven safe". But when it comes to something in their backyard, the onus of proof has been neatly reversed.</p></blockquote><p>Kedgely is the main reason I avoided voting green for so long. I guess I count myself as…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:07:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23033#post23033</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23033#post23033</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It's definitely ironic. Key has basically learned from Clark to sit in the middle and read the polls.</p></blockquote><p>I see Cullen is emphatically claiming that Key and Tim Groser came to Labour looking for a compromise because of their concern about the impact on relations with Australia if the bill…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:07:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Will @ work</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23031#post23031</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23031#post23031</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Dr Pippa Mackay explained on Morning Report what this means for the approval of all new medicines: longer delays as Medsafe, which had been anticipating the joint trans-Tasman regulator, struggles to keep up, higher costs, and fewer new medicines approved.</p></blockquote><p>It is the same logic supporting the TB that Jim…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:02:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23030#post23030</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23030#post23030</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Tom: I find it rather ironic that when Clark does a 'U-turn', or rolls over/sidelines her front bench to 'front foot' a politically sensitive issue, it's a sign of strength; when Key does he's a flake, at best, or a two-faced arsehole with some secret agenda.</p></blockquote><p>It's definitely ironic. Key…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:02:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23028#post23028</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23028#post23028</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The country that throws a guy in jail on a political whim *after* a court decides to free him? Sorry Craig, no such thing.</p></blockquote><p>Which has precisely what relationship to joint regulation as proposed in the Therapeutic Products and Medicines Bill?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:57:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23027#post23027</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23027#post23027</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Is it just me or does the Green's current goal seem to be to take down this Government in a sort of death by 1000 cuts approach?</p></blockquote><p>No, Don &ndash; it's not just you. <a href="http://norightturn.blogspot.com/2007/07/pointing-finger.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">according to NRT</a>, that's exactly the line Chris Trotter floated in his <em>Independent</em> column last week.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:53:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23026#post23026</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23026#post23026</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"...Is it just me or does the Green's current goal seem to be to take down this Government in a sort of death by 1000 cuts approach?"</p><p>No, its just the social engineering tail trying to wag the dog and in its arrogance pissing the entire country off.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:49:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23025#post23025</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23025#post23025</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Well, now that National has its victory, it might agree in a few months to a compromise...</p></blockquote><p>But that would mean John Key changing his mind!</p><p>The problem is that unless any solution actually adopts the joint regulator proposal, NZ suppliers will have to go through <em>two</em> regulatory processes if…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:49:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23023#post23023</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23023#post23023</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>There is a much better solution to the Foreshore and Seabed law:</p><p>&ndash; allow Maori to recover their ownership of the foreshore and seabed where appropriate</p><p>&ndash; legislate for access to a coastal strip everywhere there isn't a strong safety reason to prevent it. This would apply to iwi, to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:47:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23022#post23022</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23022#post23022</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>gratuitous anti-Ocker paranoia</em></p><p>The country that throws a guy in jail on a political whim *after* a court decides to free him? Sorry Craig, no such thing.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:43:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23020#post23020</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23020#post23020</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>National's constant U-turning (on the issue of new rules for press coverage in the house, on the Foreshore and Seabed) and Key's inability to take a policy position on anything is starting to cause that most fatal of political consequences &ndash; being taken as a joke.</p></blockquote><p>Tom: I find it…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:41:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23018#post23018</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23018#post23018</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Tony Ryall and Sue Kedgley</p></blockquote><p>Now there's a duo whose four hands on the health portfolio would make you think. </p><p>Is it just me or does the Green's current goal seem to be to take down this Government in a sort of death by 1000 cuts approach?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:35:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23016#post23016</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23016#post23016</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Well, now that National has its victory, it might agree in a few months to a compromise...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:29:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael Stevens</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23013#post23013</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23013#post23013</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Kedgely was hysterical and ill-informed on this topic, I agree.<br />And let's not forget this is the woman who wanted to ban DHMO, dihydrogen monoxide. She's a well-meaning fool.</p><p>Ryall was just nasty, but that's no surprise.</p><p>And Copeland, well, the sooner he's gone, the better the place will be.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:15:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23012#post23012</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23012#post23012</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>This from a political entity that pontificated on the importance of public safety and environmental safety at all costs during the GE debate. Where is the precautionary principle now?</p></blockquote><p>Quite so. The Greens' stand on GMOs was that they had to be "proven safe". But when it comes to something…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:15:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23009#post23009</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23009#post23009</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>grrrr</p><p>It is with disgust that I see what the Green Party has done to this Bill.</p><p>Any thought that the Greens were anything other than money grubbing selfish <insert derogatory term of your choice here> has to be banished now.</p><p>Of course they oppose a Bill that would require their own businesses to actually prove safety…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:10:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23008#post23008</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23008#post23008</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Surely the fault for any negative consequences rests more with those who drafted it ineffectively &ndash; rather than with the opposition parties who did what they're supposed to &ndash; i.e. oppose questionable legislation?</p></blockquote><p>No, I don't resile from the hysteria word at all. She was completely over the top -…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:03:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Jenkins</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23002#post23002</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23002#post23002</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>So, via hysteria on the one hand (and yes I do think that's a fair description of some of Kedgley's rhetoric) and naked political calculation on the other, New Zealanders will suffer.</p></blockquote><p>That's not entirely fair... the Bill failed because it had at least the <em>appearance</em> of being overly restrictive,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:52:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Anorak</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23001#post23001</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23001#post23001</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>So looking forward to the SJD gig on Thursday!<br />One of the most exciting and original groups (I know, led by Sean, but still a band, if you will) around, I reckon.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:48:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23000#post23000</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=23000#post23000</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>National's constant U-turning (on the issue of new rules for press coverage in the house, on the Foreshore and Seabed) and Key's inability to take a policy position on anything is starting to cause that most fatal of political consequences &ndash; being taken as a joke.</p></blockquote><p>Key certainly has his…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:46:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Roger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=22999#post22999</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=22999#post22999</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Kedgley, at least, genuinely opposed the bill on its content.</p></blockquote><p>What the!  This is the woman who wants stringent labelling, testing and certification of food, but is happy to have any old rubbish in "complementary" potions.  Yesterday she was hammering away on non-approved ingredients in baby formula, when in her…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:41:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=22998#post22998</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=22998#post22998</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>National's constant U-turning (on the issue of new rules for press coverage in the house, on the Foreshore and Seabed) and Key's inability to take a policy position on anything is starting to cause that most fatal of political consequences &ndash; being taken as a joke. </p><p>As for the Therapeutics…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:40:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=22995#post22995</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=22995#post22995</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Glad I'm not the only one who noticed the comment about Copeland's proxy. No, you can't have your vote. Not yours.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:26:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=22991#post22991</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=22991#post22991</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Whoops. Forgot to turn on discussion. Feel free to hammer away now ...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:11:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=22990#post22990</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-no-bills/?p=22990#post22990</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:11:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
