<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Hard News: New Rules</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>InternationalObserver</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=23952#post23952</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=23952#post23952</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>ssssshhhhh!</p><p>Let's see if anyone else in the media (esp. C4) reads PA ...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:30:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=23948#post23948</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=23948#post23948</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Sorry to drag this all the way back up to the top, but my friend in America (no, really, an actual friend in America!) informs me that our lovely new rules about satirising and denigrating Parliament actually make The Daily Show tonight.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:56:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22632#post22632</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22632#post22632</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/7/4/9/00NZPHomeNews100720071-Full-proceedings-of-Parliament-available-to.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">parliament website announcement</a> on the webcast.</p><p>begins 17 JULY. you can has a archive, but that would be about all we know</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:51:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andrew llewellyn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22309#post22309</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22309#post22309</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>(But probably also because HNZ have a mandate to house people in need &ndash; if the Salt's can prove they're 'in need' how do you terminate?)</p></blockquote><p>I think you might be right there. I do know that they serve quite a few eviction notices, but follow through on very few…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:29:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>InternationalObserver</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22305#post22305</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22305#post22305</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p><em>So why didn't HNZ issue a completely legal 90 day notice of termination?</em> </p><p>Are you sure they didn't?</p></blockquote><p>Pretty sure, because if they had of then the Salt family tenancy would be terminated with 90 days notice. And if they had tried it already (but failed), it would have been…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 01:18:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22303#post22303</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22303#post22303</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1622015,00.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1622015,00.html</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 23:24:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22302#post22302</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22302#post22302</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yes, will I be able to stream it to my PDA so I can watch it on the toilet? It will certainly help any time I've got constipation.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 22:31:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stafford Lumsden</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22299#post22299</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22299#post22299</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						What of the streaming parliamentary video? Will it be in an open format? Or rubbish windows media like Question Time on TVNZ?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 21:49:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22291#post22291</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22291#post22291</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And there are times when I'm tempted to e-mail David Farrar and volunteer to help keep house after reading  <a href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/07/housing_nz_evictions.html#comments" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this kind of outright creepy drivel</a>...</p><blockquote><p>I said to my wife ,overseas in some places the neighbours would have burnt the house down, like in Iraq a thought ,positive direct action,burn…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 17:46:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael  Fitzgerald</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22290#post22290</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22290#post22290</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Are these the poster children for the new (&amp; fascist) ASBO &ndash; Anti Social Behaviour Order &ndash; (Black Square is an optional extra).</p><p>Is this the work of Dr McTurk who made such a splash  at the Christchurch City Council?</p><p>Sorry to repeat myself but, <br />Why do we know about the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 17:09:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22275#post22275</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22275#post22275</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>>That's rather prime ministerial, and very political from where I'm sitting.</p></blockquote><p>Yes, and I wasn't too impressed upon reading this gem from Housing Minister Chris Carter in The Herald:</p><blockquote><p>Housing Minister Chris Carter thought the adjudicator had not paid enough regard to the distress of other neighbours on the street…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 14:22:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22270#post22270</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22270#post22270</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Helen is doing a lot of undignified snapping. Surely a plan for the future, a clear direction is better than Cpt Blighs cat of nine tails.</p></blockquote><p>Well, I'm sure they do have a plan for the future, and it wouldn't surprise me if part of it is 'coming down on…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 13:54:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22269#post22269</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22269#post22269</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>a bit unfair on Clark I think. That state house is in her electorate so as an MP she has to take some action and I'd be very surprised if she didn't know the back-story to it all.</p></blockquote><p>Well, I've no problem with any MP advocating on behalf of their…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 13:50:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22263#post22263</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22263#post22263</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>So it wouldn't surprise me if some of the Labour hacks are picking up the phone and telling Helen "I think it'd be good if you came out against the electricity company that cut that family's power" and "against that family in the state house that everyone is bagging in…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 13:14:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22262#post22262</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22262#post22262</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Rochelle </p><p>"It is no help for democracy, and the necessary public participation, to have yet more, typically, concentration by the media on peripheral behaviours."</p><p>I can't see that it's any particular hindrance to democracy either. If you don't trust the papers, read the blogosphere or the raw material. But don't…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 13:02:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andrew llewellyn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22251#post22251</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22251#post22251</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>So why didn't HNZ issue a completely legal 90 day notice of termination?</p></blockquote><p>Are you sure they didn't?</p><blockquote><p>Could it be that it doesn't 'fit' with the ethos of State Housing ie tenants can stay as long as they like for as long as they want to?</p></blockquote><p>Probably not, they…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 11:44:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael  Fitzgerald</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22250#post22250</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22250#post22250</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Kyle<br />Helen is doing a lot of undignified snapping.  Surely a plan for the future, a clear direction is better than Cpt Blighs cat of nine tails.  </p><p>Corrections is primarily a failure as a result of Labours 'successful' lock'em up and don't spare the years.<br />Aside from the pay-for-opinion surveys…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 11:37:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rochelle Wilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22248#post22248</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22248#post22248</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>All surveys of "trust-worthiness" have Politicians as the least trusted. It takes guts and determination for most, to work towards being elected.. and it is done to try and effect change of some kind, in the way NZ is, economically and socially. <br />It is no help for democracy, and the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 11:26:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22247#post22247</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22247#post22247</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Aunty Helens started beneficary Bashing as well jumping in on a housing corp house eviction.</p></blockquote><p>I'd guess that there's some Labour political strategists who have looked back over Mr Field, Bradford's bill, Corrections, Police etc, and come to the conclusion that they've had a pretty crap year. It's showing in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 11:18:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>InternationalObserver</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22198#post22198</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22198#post22198</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>   Aunty Helens started beneficary Bashing as well jumping in on a housing corp house eviction. How did the media get in on this again? And why?</em></p><p>Yeah, but you have to admit it's kinda funny that the Government that has championed tenants rights over landlords now finds itself in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 01:05:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Martin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22196#post22196</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22196#post22196</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The thing is...I can't quite remember the last time I saw some political satire on the telly.There may have been something with puppets or masks or something...or was that actual coverage of Parliament sitting?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 00:48:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22186#post22186</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22186#post22186</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Michael, I'm not into it either, I prefer seeing people get pounded. Sick, but true.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 21:19:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael  Fitzgerald</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22185#post22185</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22185#post22185</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Ben &ndash; I've never been to  a Cricket Test although I can appreciate that sitting in the sun &amp; drinking all day is good. I just don't need that excuse.</p><p>I don't like Cricket &ndash; oh no &ndash; I hate it. apologies to 10cc</p><p>Surf Life Saving &amp; Beach Volley Ball win…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 21:00:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Felix Marwick</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22183#post22183</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22183#post22183</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>At the risk of kicking permit me a comment or three.</p><p>1) Behaviour during Question Time tends to be fractious at the best of times (though Thursdays are often quiet). However this does not mean things improve during debates on legislation. Some of the more extreme stuff I've witnessed has…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 20:27:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22182#post22182</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22182#post22182</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Michael, haven't you ever been to a cricket test? It's not only normal, it's expected.</p><p>Yes, sorry to put the kibosh on the lads. I've been in a tailspin since Saturday night, reflected in that post. *They're allowed* to be human.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 20:07:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22181#post22181</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22181#post22181</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>We are even less allowed to see the way in which the decisions as to what to vote are made, the whipping, the threats, the negotiations, the endless board meetings, the focus groups etc.</p></blockquote><p>Good point.  I guess what I'd say is this:  </p><p>Parliament is made of people with divergent…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 20:05:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael  Fitzgerald</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22180#post22180</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22180#post22180</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Ben said:</p><p>"That is what is a circus about it. I'm not even referring to the ridiculous behaviour in the house, the gesturing, yelling over the top, falling asleep, yawning dramatically, slandering people etc. That's all normal human behaviour..."</p><p>Dear I say it &ndash; that is not NORMAL human behaviour…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 19:58:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22179#post22179</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22179#post22179</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It's not like I would ever actually watch Parliament or take BZP again, but I figure I should be allowed. There's been a bit too much 'you're not allowed' recently, from having a decent stadium for the world cup to having the kind of car you want. Every little thing…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 19:14:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22176#post22176</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22176#post22176</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>No-one from Act spoke, or was present during the debate. Indeed, only one member of the press gallery sat through the whole thing.</p></blockquote><p>(a) I know it must be difficult with a caucus of two, but when you've expressed a view to media, isn't it just good form to actually…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 17:57:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22174#post22174</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22174#post22174</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Lyndon &ndash; my guess would be that the Greens support the new rules (even unammended) over the old rules. They do open the place up. And without these rules, then there wouldn't have been Parliamentary approval for the live feed they'd be offering, and we couldn't have live footage 'round…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 17:40:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22172#post22172</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22172#post22172</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>By which, of course, I meant <em>The Greens said "Yes"</em>.</p><p>On the substantive point, it is worthwhile to note the overseas experience. Our rules are pretty liberal.</p><p>Even in the US &ndash; rightly regarded as an upholder of free speech &ndash; video footage of Congress is provided by the Speaker…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 17:32:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22168#post22168</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22168#post22168</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Ta, Graeme. I was listening on the radio and obviously became confused when Nandor said</p><blockquote><p>Like Mr Rodney Hide, my personal view is that people should be able to film what they like.</p></blockquote><p>... i had the impression someone had interjected just then and thought it was rodders.</p><p>I don't know if…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 16:57:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22167#post22167</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22167#post22167</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"So it's completely trivial and the only thing worth televising? Do you bother voting, Ben?"</p><p>I do, but I have to wonder why. It's never made the slightest difference to NZ or me. Old habits I guess.</p><p>And yes it can be both trivial and the only thing worth televising.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 16:49:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22166#post22166</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22166#post22166</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>I noticed Mr Edgeler on Mr Espiner's blog saying the order actually passed unopposed. Perhaps the vote everyone quoted was the one for Nandor's amendment? And either way I have to ask &ndash; where was Rodney "people should be able to film what they want" Hide? (it sounded like he…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 16:44:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22159#post22159</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22159#post22159</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Now that's humour. Let's face it, as a nation, we're just not that funny.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 16:11:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Darlington</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22158#post22158</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22158#post22158</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The result is that Ron Mark goes out on digital high-rotation</p></blockquote><p>Always with the finger jokes...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 16:03:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22152#post22152</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22152#post22152</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>As Peter Bromhead noted on Agenda, Farce is not included in their guidelines :)</p></blockquote><p>Or indeed bathos.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 15:34:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22151#post22151</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22151#post22151</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Oh, and I was toying with the idea of organising a boycott. </p><p>Anywhere where you would have used footage of parliament,  you instead re-enact the scene with figerpuppets and silly voices.</p><p>This would continue until politicians realise allowing free use of the feed is not the worst option.</p><p>I would…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 15:34:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22150#post22150</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22150#post22150</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Should I? What's actually happening in there that is more important or interesting than bad clowning? Does it actually affect me any more than exclusive interviews with Paris Hilton? It's certainly a lot less interesting.</p></blockquote><p>So it's completely trivial <em>and</em> the only thing worth televising? Do you bother voting, Ben?…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 15:28:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>InternationalObserver</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22148#post22148</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22148#post22148</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>A sleeping-MP gotcha will lead the news while important legislative events go unexplained.</em></p><p>I think  that's the key point people. Maybe if we had more substantive reporting then they'd tolerate the 'lite' stuff, but as RB points out most of it is just cheapshots.</p><p>But then again ... we all…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 15:26:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22146#post22146</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22146#post22146</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Well, your view is not an uncommon one, and MPs have themselves to blame for that in part. But how much of that perspective has been shaped by the fact that almost the only time Parliament is actually news is when bad clowns playact? Do you pay attention at any…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 15:22:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22145#post22145</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22145#post22145</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						There was a thing on 3(?) last(?) night making the australia comparision.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 15:22:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22143#post22143</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22143#post22143</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Ah. Here's an angle that's gone missing. From <a href="http://www.museum.tv/archives/etv/P/htmlP/parliamentc/parliamentc.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Toby Miller's backgrounder at museum.tv</a>. The Aussies got there a long time ago on the "satire and ridicule" thing:</p><blockquote><p>For the most part, parliaments want to control coverage. Guidelines on the use of file footage of proceedings issued by Australia's Joint Committee…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 15:15:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22142#post22142</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22142#post22142</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Russell, <br />"But how much of that perspective has been shaped by the fact that almost the only time Parliament is actually news is when bad clowns playact? Do you pay attention at any other time?"</p><p>Should I? What's actually happening in there that is more important or interesting than bad…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:55:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22139#post22139</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22139#post22139</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thing that that worries me aboput the 'satire etc' thing (aside from making my actual job more fraught with terror) is the way it extends the rules from the content (eg it's contempt if you say he's corrupt) to the form (not using the feed) and, in that area, dramitically…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:40:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22137#post22137</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22137#post22137</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>That it trivializes what is already trivial is merely honesty. Which should *always* be allowed. Parliament has been a ridiculous circus full of bad clowns playacting for a long time, and for the public to see it is important.</p></blockquote><p>Well, your view is not an uncommon one, and MPs have…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:37:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22135#post22135</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22135#post22135</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>the new provisions were passed with only the Greens objecting.</p></blockquote><p>The new provisions passed unanimously.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:32:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22134#post22134</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22134#post22134</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Well, Weston, with all due disrespect to the great and the good, I think I'm capable of deciding for myself what constitutes 'worthwhile coverage' of politics, and adjusting my viewing/reading accordingly</p></blockquote><p>If what I said strikes you as patronising elitism, I guess I'm guilty.  Its all about who will guard…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:32:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22133#post22133</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22133#post22133</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Weston</p><p>"The result is that the television news cannot be relied upon to provide worthwhile coverage of what happens in Parliament."</p><p>That doesn't mean it should be stopped. I personally think coverage of Paris Hilton *is* more worthwhile than Parliamentary footage, but the conclusion of that is not that Parliamentary…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:23:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Beard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22132#post22132</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22132#post22132</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Do Lolcats count as "satire, ridicule or denigration"? If so, <a href="http://wellingtonista.com/lolmembers" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">we're in trouble</a>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:20:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22131#post22131</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22131#post22131</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The result is that the television news cannot be relied upon to provide worthwhile coverage of what happens in Parliament</p></blockquote><p>Well, Weston, with all due disrespect to the great and the good, I think I'm capable of deciding for myself what constitutes 'worthwhile coverage' of politics, and adjusting my viewing/reading…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:15:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gary  Hutchings</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22128#post22128</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22128#post22128</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						As Peter Bromhead noted on Agenda, Farce is not included in their guidelines :)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:03:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Morgan Nichol</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22127#post22127</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22127#post22127</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						This is enabling our representatives to continue behaving badly &ndash; and quite frankly I'm disgusted by it.  I'm very proud of our democratic history, and this appears to me to be against fundamental principles of democracy.  (Voting without free access to information about what and who you're voting on is…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 13:57:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22126#post22126</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22126#post22126</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I think there are a few unpleasant realities that tend to explain these restrictions, whether or not they are a good idea.</p><p>The first reality is that television news coverage is brief and of a low quality.  "One News gives you a full report" often translates as 5 or 10…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 13:56:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22125#post22125</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22125#post22125</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I *am* without sympathy. When you choose a public life you have to get over the fact that a lot of it will be public, especially what you do in your actual place of work, especially when that is meant to be representing your electorate.</p><p>Not that I'm the least…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 13:51:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22122#post22122</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22122#post22122</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>They're just trying to stop the reality TV series, Big Brother &ndash; The Politician. Ron Mark voted off in first election episode for giving finger to public.<br />Yeah Right.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 13:38:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22119#post22119</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22119#post22119</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I concur Paul. Once laws start talking about limiting the use of images/material for valid news purposes, then it starts to set off warning bells.</p><p>There are a reasonable number of people who when they're at work, are always on camera, and don't get to set limits on what ends…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 13:30:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22118#post22118</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22118#post22118</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Good satire is worth it's weight in gold. Ridicule I'm not so fond of.</p><p>Why not insist that if broadcaster spends 5 minutes on satire or ridicule then they need to spend 5 minutes on considered analysis of the proceedings.</p><p>I don't believe being an MP is necessarily an easy…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 13:30:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Litterick</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22111#post22111</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22111#post22111</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						We all of us have the right to go to Parliament to watch proceedings. We also have the right to watch televised coverage, unmediated by the subjects. If dickheads like Ron Mark choose to behave like schoolchildren, then that should be their problem, not the broadcaster's. We, the voters, have…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 13:15:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22097#post22097</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22097#post22097</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>No, I am not without sympathy for our MPs. The New Zealand news media's coverage of Parliament is often superficial. A sleeping-MP gotcha will lead the news while important legislative events go unexplained.</p></blockquote><p>Well, I'd only extend my sympathy up to a point, Lord Copper.  If political coverage has become…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 12:44:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22096#post22096</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-rules/?p=22096#post22096</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 12:44:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
