<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Hard News: New Old Left?</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Raymond A Francis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=191759#post191759</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=191759#post191759</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Well that didn't work very well<br />Mana only gave 816 votes to Mat out of 22.000<br />Greens held their percentage but should have made some increase<br />Labour a fail, by- elections are meant to favour the opposition, not much sign of that here</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 10:01:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>newtestleper</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=191528#post191528</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=191528#post191528</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						In Between 2002 and 2005 Anderton was 3rd in Cabinet and held major portfolios. Hide is outside Cabinet and about the only thing he could be said to have influenced is the Auckland govt reorganisation (which National was arguably going to do anyway). His local govt reform bill is significantly…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:02:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=191190#post191190</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=191190#post191190</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/4350277/Harawira-backs-McCarten-for-Mana" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Harawira backs McCarten for Mana</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:16:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Just thinking</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190986#post190986</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190986#post190986</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I hear Pansy has dragged Jenny Shipley into this mess too. She,has her hubbies business at her electorate office address.</p><p>Pansy has always appeared charming to me, I don’t know how effective she has been, but certainly charming. <br />As such it seems the whole lot of them are crocked carpet…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 17:12:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190954#post190954</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190954#post190954</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And the “characters”, dear Lord. John Banks, Jim Bolger, Chris Fletcher, Graham Thorne, Simon Upton, Muldoon, Murray McCully, Jenny Shipley, Winston Peters, Bill Birch, Ross Meurant –</p></blockquote><p>Pretty much what anyone would experience after buying a 2.5 kilo bag of spuds and contemplating the contents before submitting them to the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:21:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190907#post190907</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190907#post190907</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And Mr Henry <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/4344886/Paul-Henry-TVNZ-turned-on-me" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">claims TVNZ egged him on</a>. Live by the sword, die by the sword &ndash; and that goes for both Henry &amp; TVNZ. I sincerely hope it's the beginning of the end of the current model.</p><p>For the Henryites out there who have a problem with the Anand Satyanands…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:31:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andre Alessi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190858#post190858</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190858#post190858</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Apparently, there’s some people there who aren’t 100% white or something.. Who knew?</p></blockquote><p>It’s almost as though this racially pure utopia she yearns for doesn’t exist or something.</p><p>I still find it funny that she insists she was defending “Australia’s” culture, then decided Britain was a better place to live,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:01:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190849#post190849</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190849#post190849</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>One hopes that he has to emigrate across the ditch and makes a new start in Qld, where his sort of views are considered acceptable.</p></blockquote><p>Not sure that they'd welcome him with open arms, though. He may not be ethnically.... <em>pure</em> ... enough for Queensland.</p><p>Slightly off-topic, but did anyone…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:24:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190842#post190842</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190842#post190842</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Why on earth was Henry even allowed on a mainstream television network when he belongs to the augean stable market segment of squawkback radio? It certainly wasn't intended to attract mainstream educated liberal viewers to TVNZ. Given the high segmentation of the broadcast radio market, TVNZ really should have known…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:55:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jacqui Dunn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190820#post190820</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190820#post190820</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Might have been two hours ago, but made me laugh at 11.20!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:21:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190792#post190792</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190792#post190792</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>re Travel Perks...</strong><br />Now it seems politicians are admitting <br />they are not to be trusted with temptation, <br />and want their <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/4343849/MPs-want-travel-perk-scrapped" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">travel perks rescinded</a> ...</p><p>...or is this merely a classic case of <br />two Wongs unmaking a Right?</p><p>too early?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 09:40:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190759#post190759</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190759#post190759</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Narcissists Anonymous meeting success...</strong><br />Laws, <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/sunday-star-times/opinion/4342578/Nationals-Class-of-90-reunion-proves-misfits-can-heal-wounds" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">in SST,</a> waxing lyrical about a parliamentary reunion:</p><blockquote><p>And the "characters", dear Lord. John Banks, Jim Bolger, Chris Fletcher, Graham Thorne, Simon Upton, Muldoon, Murray McCully, Jenny Shipley, Winston Peters, Bill Birch, Ross Meurant – **we were not so much a caucus as a collection…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 19:56:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190755#post190755</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190755#post190755</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						No doubt the only reason he's steering away from claiming that Satyanand provoked him with his brown-ness
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 19:12:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190753#post190753</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190753#post190753</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But he is not outraged by his former employer, although he acknowledges he was egged on to be outrageous himself.</p></blockquote><p>I guess he knows provocation <br />is no longer a defence for <br />unsavoury behaviour.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 19:05:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190739#post190739</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190739#post190739</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>“The governor-general is a good man and I didn’t say anything that implied he wasn’t a good man or that he wasn’t a New Zealander.</p><p>“‘Is he even a New Zealander’ is a cheeky way of starting a conversation about who might be next."</p></blockquote><p>....I. I don't even.</p><p>(I know,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 15:36:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jacqui Dunn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190737#post190737</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190737#post190737</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Just <em>because</em> ,OK, Cecelia?</p><p>EDIT: <em>Snap</em>, Sacha. Although I didn't think it needed any explanation, myself:)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 15:31:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190735#post190735</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190735#post190735</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Because right now neither Search nor browsing will find me an existing Paul Henry thread, here’s the latest. Expect a self-pitying, ignorant, unapologetic blurt in New Idea tomorrow, TVNZ <a href="http://tvnz.co.nz/entertainment-news/paul-henry-tells-all-women-s-mag-new-idea-3895726" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">tells us</a> today.</p><blockquote><p>[Henry] said he is disgusted at the fact that Bella, Sophie, 20, and Lucy 22, and his 81-year-old…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 15:15:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190732#post190732</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190732#post190732</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Okay, here's my take on the likelihood of a neo-Alliance party. Clearly, there was a political space to the left of Labour during the nineties, but whether it's still unoccupied there today is a moot point. Added to which, while Matt McCarten is a damned good union organiser, he doesn't…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:58:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190727#post190727</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190727#post190727</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Did Lockwood Smith try to change the Travel Perk rules to stop the actions of Pansy Wong coming to public notice?</p></blockquote><p>Yes, the timing seemed interesting though travel-independent disgruntlement likely had a part to play in Hodgson’s papertrail ending up in his hands. I wouldn’t be surprised if Auckland’s Chinese…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:04:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190726#post190726</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190726#post190726</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Last time I looked, which was some years ago, Japanese radio & TV was even more that way. Man goes "Yibble-yibble-yibble" in o what a clever fellow I am tone of voice, ditzy support-woman goes "Hai! Hai!"
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:02:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190724#post190724</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190724#post190724</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						oops &ndash; duplicate (inadvertent double click)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 13:56:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190723#post190723</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190723#post190723</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And why does there have to be a dominant male presenter and a softer, even ditzy, female co-presenter?</p></blockquote><p>.. because producers believe (and ratings reinforce) that some audiences want their stereotypes reinforced over the cornflakes.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 13:55:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Just thinking</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190715#post190715</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190715#post190715</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Did Lockwood Smith try to change the Travel Perk rules to stop the actions of Pansy Wong coming to public notice?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 09:50:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Cecelia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190711#post190711</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190711#post190711</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/4343007/TVNZs-Breakfast-wants-Holmes-sweet-Holmes" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/4343007/TVNZs-Breakfast-wants-Holmes-sweet-Holmes</a></p><p>This is not good for the left! That they would even consider him for the job … He has been vile lately. <br />And why does there have to be a dominant male presenter and a softer, even ditzy, female co-presenter?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 09:02:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190705#post190705</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190705#post190705</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I meant more the idea of having explicitly joint leadership which must always be one man/one woman &ndash; that's still quite peculiar to the Greens.As Kyle says, it's a little arbitrary. Humanity doesn't divide up neatly along those lines.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 03:10:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190698#post190698</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190698#post190698</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It’s certainly the present of political parties, if not the future. Having a woman on the top ticket, if not at the very top, is a good way to look sympathetic to female voters</p></blockquote><p>I don't disagree that having women in top positions is a good thing.</p><p>But I'm dubious…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 21:03:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190671#post190671</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190671#post190671</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks, Brendon. I agree that appealing to voters in a more than academic way is a challenge.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 10:59:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>B Jones</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190660#post190660</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190660#post190660</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It's certainly the <em>present</em>  of political parties, if not the future.  Having a woman on the top ticket, if not at the very top, is a good way to look sympathetic to female voters without too much risk of a freakout about a woman in charge like Julia Gillard (and…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 08:58:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190655#post190655</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190655#post190655</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Gender-shared leadership is the future of political parties IMO. The Greens figured that out already.</p></blockquote><p>I find the concept an interesting take on leadership, but I somehow doubt it's going to be "the future of political parties". Two reasons: co-leadership is <em>hard</em>, especially when it comes to questions like "who…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 03:11:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Brendon Mills</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190643#post190643</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190643#post190643</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>*just to show you all that I am more than a hobbit troll*</p><p>The idea of a left wing party sounds pretty alright to me. But it has to appeal to an audience that is beyond that of the whole ban-the-bomb-and-stop-the-tour crowd who attend <em>Das Kapital</em> discussion groups in university…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 20:37:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Brendon Mills</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190641#post190641</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190641#post190641</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>*just to show that I am not soley into trolling about hobbits*</p><p>A new left wing party. Sounds good, I would vote for it. </p><p>But for a left party to have a half-pie chance of succeeding, it needs to broaden its appeal to beyond ban-the-bomb-and-stop-the-tour-types who attend <em>Das Kapital</em> book…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 20:28:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190627#post190627</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190627#post190627</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I see a lucrative global reality tv franchise in the offing
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:55:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190624#post190624</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190624#post190624</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>This is a bit out of left field I realise, but if they could get along, Bradford and Goff might team up well: one centre-left, one clear left.</p></blockquote><p>You <em>must</em> be kidding. We'd have to spend the entire elctoral cycle whistling the theme from <em>The Odd Couple</em>, for one thing.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:51:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190623#post190623</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190623#post190623</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Goff’s presence could work as a moderating influence on Bradford’s so called ‘extremism’ (anti-smacking). Goff is calm and experienced to Bradford’s passion and commitment to social justice. They could work well together.</p></blockquote><p>Like gay rights, the rights of children is only an issue for the reactionary fringe. Key has demonstrated…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:47:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190611#post190611</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190611#post190611</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Be fun to watch, though...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:44:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190606#post190606</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190606#post190606</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Bradford-Goff would have the small problem of once a week Sue being dragged out of Goff's office having occupied it.</p><p>They're a long way apart on the political spectrum.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:10:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>sally jones</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190598#post190598</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190598#post190598</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>There are a number of people close to the Greens who would like to see Bradford start a proper social justice party</p></blockquote><p>Apologies, I haven't read the discussion in full. </p><p>Ever since she left parliament I have considered Bradford a promising candidate to lead a revamped Labour Party. This is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:42:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190455#post190455</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190455#post190455</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Or are you arguing, like the Chinese government, that the poor shouldn’t worry their pretty little heads about detention without trial for months on end, for example, as long as there’s rice in the bowl?</p></blockquote><p>I'm not familiar enough with the domestic policy of Blair's government (which wasn't, in the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 02:28:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jonse</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190437#post190437</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190437#post190437</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I agree to a certain point that the Green leadership isn't performing &ndash; but as a Green member I have started losing faith in the membership itself. </p><p>I am still astounded that the Wellington Central electorate has decided to replace one of the last of the 'old guard' with a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 22:25:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Just thinking</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190434#post190434</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190434#post190434</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Sacha @ yip That's what a <br />Representative Domocracy does well.<br />Oh hang on ....</p><p>But then you knew that.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 22:09:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>rodgerd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190392#post190392</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190392#post190392</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>That’s right: it’s totally cool to leave the poor and disabled to suffer as long as you don’t start any actual shooting wars while doing so.</p></blockquote><p>So, Lucy, did the wealth gaps in the UK narrow or widen under Blair?</p><p>Or are you arguing, like the Chinese government, that the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 19:16:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190359#post190359</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190359#post190359</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Cutting early childhood education and older people's homecare must have been what NZ voters wanted.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 08:53:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190357#post190357</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190357#post190357</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And yet rolling back Labour's human rights abuses, more traction on electoral reform than Labour had after spending the 90s promising it, and no illegal wars started.</p></blockquote><p>That's right: it's totally cool to leave the poor and disabled to suffer as long as you don't start any actual shooting wars…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 07:47:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190353#post190353</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190353#post190353</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yeah, must be great being British, you have not just one Tory party to vote for, not two, but three!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 04:26:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>rodgerd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190345#post190345</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190345#post190345</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Would there be much of a political market for a Lib-Dems type party?</p></blockquote><p>The Fitzsimmons/Donald/Tancos Greens actually had that nailed down fairly nicely in many ways.</p><blockquote><p>Oh, that's what they promise &ndash; but when they go into coalition, it turns into the social policy of Thatcher, and the economic policy…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 22:32:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190339#post190339</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190339#post190339</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Would there be much of a political market for a Lib-Dems type party? In other words, the social policy of Labour or the Greens, and the economic policy of Peter Dunne or Winston Peters.</p></blockquote><p>Oh, that's what they promise &ndash; but when they go into coalition, it turns into the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 22:12:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190332#post190332</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190332#post190332</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>People who liked Labour but thought Hide was an effective local advocate engaged with his community who had done a good job as local MP. What's confusing about that?</p></blockquote><p>The fact that it meant that Labour would lose power, by aiding ACT in passing the threshold. But yes, there is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 18:18:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190330#post190330</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190330#post190330</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Hey, Ben.<br />Drop me an email, if you would, please.</p></blockquote><p>Dropped.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:28:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190327#post190327</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190327#post190327</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'd imagine there's a fair few Act voters who believe in the party's principles (economic liberalism, reduced taxes etc), but not in some of the places that Hide has taken it (perkbusting while taking perks, SST, 3 strikes crime law etc).</p><p>It strikes me as a pretty divided party.</p></blockquote><p>Would…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:47:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190326#post190326</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190326#post190326</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>WTF???</p></blockquote><p>I'd imagine there's a fair few Act voters who believe in the party's principles (economic liberalism, reduced taxes etc), but not in some of the places that Hide has taken it (perkbusting while taking perks, SST, 3 strikes crime law etc).</p><p>It strikes me as a pretty divided party.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:29:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190325#post190325</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190325#post190325</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Wonder if Epsom will still see him in the same light after being caught with his hand in the till? All the more so because he normally pontificates about fiscal restraint.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:21:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190322#post190322</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190322#post190322</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I find the ones who party voted Labour but gave electorate vote to Hide the most confused.</p></blockquote><p>People who liked Labour but thought Hide was an effective local advocate engaged with his community who had done a good job as local MP. What's confusing about that?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:08:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190321#post190321</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190321#post190321</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Hey, Ben.<br />Drop me an email, if you would, please.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:06:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190320#post190320</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190320#post190320</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>They wanted ACT in parliament, but only if it could make 5% without a life-line?</p><p>They wanted ACT in parliament, but really didnt like Hide?</p><p>They just didnt understand how the system works?</p></blockquote><p>Probably all of those. Also, there are people who might prefer a different local representative to Hide,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:56:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190319#post190319</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190319#post190319</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						They represent perfectly the champions of private excellence the party offers as its solution to every problem
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:41:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>FletcherB</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190317#post190317</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190317#post190317</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And 11% of people who gave their party vote to ACT in Epsom, voted for someone other than Rodney!</p></blockquote><p>WTF???</p><p>They wanted ACT in parliament, but only if it could make 5% without a life-line?</p><p>They wanted ACT in parliament, but really didnt like Hide?</p><p>They just didnt understand how…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:37:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190289#post190289</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190289#post190289</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Voted ... in the vain hope of keeping Rodney out of Parliament, but cast my party vote Green. I imagine there were a few of us in Epsom who went a similar way, or split Worth/Labour.</p></blockquote><p>You <a href="http://2008.electionresults.govt.nz/electionresults_2008/elect-splitvote-12.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">might be surprised</a>.</p><p>16% of Green Party voters in Epsom gave Rodney Hide…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:50:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190283#post190283</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190283#post190283</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yes, or such strategic (rather him than him) choices, like Matthew.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:15:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190269#post190269</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190269#post190269</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Got to remember that a lot of people know that their electorate vote isn't necessarily going to come close to making a difference. So the link between the party and electorate vote might be a little frivilous.</p></blockquote><p>I'd be one of those. Voted for Worthless Dick in the vain hope…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:11:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190241#post190241</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190241#post190241</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Got to remember that a lot of people know that their electorate vote isn't necessarily going to come close to making a difference. So the link between the party and electorate vote might be a little frivilous.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 23:27:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Just thinking</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190222#post190222</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190222#post190222</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Love that chart Phil.</p><p>Checkout the leaglise dope party spliff their crossover equally with Greens &amp; National. It's Labour where the really strong stuff is.</p><p>Bill &amp; Ben have a strong National tendancy.</p><p>I'm conflustered at the Workers Party &ndash; National crossover, it's stronger than the Greens- National mutation.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 21:04:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Phil Lyth</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190155#post190155</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190155#post190155</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>heard anecdotally from someone who scrutineers in a well-heeled area that this is already the case to some extent, and there are many who vote for the NP candidate and party vote Green.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.electionresults.org.nz/electionresults_2008/elect-splitvote-Overall.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Here</a> you can see that 16,549 people voted Green list &amp; National electorate.</p><p>Whereas 74,330 voted Green list…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 14:16:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190151#post190151</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190151#post190151</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQ0VMDmGdx0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQ0VMDmGdx0</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 13:52:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190147#post190147</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190147#post190147</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						There's a farm for people as funny as you, Rich...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 13:44:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190133#post190133</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190133#post190133</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Well one out of four aint bad.</p></blockquote><p>You should have given it Marx out of ten. Ahahahahaha fuck I'm funny.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 13:09:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JLM</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190117#post190117</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190117#post190117</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I suppose to summarise, as a "centre left" supporter I think there would be more chance of having a centre-left government if the Green Party started grabbing votes off National, rather than just off Labour.</p></blockquote><p>I was at a GP gathering over the weekend, and heard anecdotally from someone who…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 12:33:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190108#post190108</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190108#post190108</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Actually, I can't see it at all*, now I reconsider. Our extreme parties always flock to centrism in crisis. I think it's a national tendency. That's probably part of the reason MMP does seem to provide stable government here &ndash; we only go nuts when times are good. In bad…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 12:09:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190105#post190105</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190105#post190105</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yup, Labour could still just occupy the center. Also, a Grand Coalition is still not impossible with MMP, if too much fragmentation happens at the edges, and the centrists find more in common with each other than with the extremes. I can see this only happening during an extreme crisis.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 11:57:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190090#post190090</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190090#post190090</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>'Course, if the Left gets in, you've still got a Labour government, every time.</p></blockquote><p>Although not necessarily the reverse, huh?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 10:31:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190086#post190086</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190086#post190086</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I don't see left wing fragmentation increasing the number of votes on that side. But it could mean that voters get the Left that they want. That's meant to be one of the points of MMP. 'Course, if the Left gets in, you've still got a Labour government, every time.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 10:13:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190083#post190083</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190083#post190083</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Would it not be possible to allow a form of STV (just not voter driven), the reallocation happening according to a pre-election list provided by the party?</p></blockquote><p>I wouldn't want the parties reallocating my party vote.</p><p>But having your MMP vote reallocated via a list (sorta like STV, but without…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 09:51:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190078#post190078</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190078#post190078</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The Super City election has brought into the light a political coalition of Pasifika, socially conscious Christian and anti-privilege bogan activists.<br />I can see McCarten and Bradford will be interested in such a new leftish beast</p></blockquote><p>As bogans are, by definition, people who hit their kids, Sue Bradford's involvement can't…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:48:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190077#post190077</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190077#post190077</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Why? Because Stalin, the Shining Path, the Red Brigades, or the Great Leap Forward haven't put you off them yet?</p></blockquote><p>No, but I see your point.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:42:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190074#post190074</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190074#post190074</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It is not unfair that the people who gave their party vote to the ACT party are represented by a group of MPs proportionate to the size of their vote.</p></blockquote><p>An argument is that influence in parliament is not proportionate to the number of elected MPs.</p><p>If ACT (or UF,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:24:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bruce Thorpe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190072#post190072</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190072#post190072</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The Super City election has brought into the light a political coalition of Pasifika,  socially conscious Christian and anti-privilege bogan activists.<br />I can see McCarten and Bradford will be interested in such a new leftish beast but I think there has always been more of this political flavour at the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 07:33:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>rodgerd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190071#post190071</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190071#post190071</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I guess Mao wasn't a true Scotsman, eh, andin.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 07:02:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Caleb D&#039;Anvers</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190070#post190070</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190070#post190070</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>I think there would be more chance of having a centre-left government if the Green Party started grabbing votes off National, rather than just off Labour. If the Greens shift to the centre, say they'll work with anyone as long as they get a number of key wins and this…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 04:56:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190069#post190069</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190069#post190069</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Act received markedly fewer votes than a party not represented in Parliament, New Zealand First...</p></blockquote><p>ACT got 85,496 votes. New Zealand First got 95,356 votes. ACT got 5 MPs. NZF got enough votes for 5 MPs. This is not a particularly marked difference.</p><blockquote><p>But <em>I</em> don't want Douglas in Parliament,…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 00:56:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Carlos</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190068#post190068</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190068#post190068</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Here in Denmark, they have a proportional system that is quite different to our own. But one element I find interesting is that in many of their elections (not the parliamentary for some reason) they allow parties to enter agreements to share surplus votes between them.</p><p>Would it not be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 00:21:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sue</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190067#post190067</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190067#post190067</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>@webweaver i am right there with you</p><p>listening to matt marcaten and the  chris trotter on the radio about the hobbit stuff made me wish that somebody could be left and tied into 'it's a class warfare issue' type discussion</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 23:39:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>webweaver</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190066#post190066</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190066#post190066</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I miss Rod Donald</p><p>*sniff*</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 22:49:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nick Kearney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190065#post190065</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190065#post190065</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Of course, the only reason you're defending the system is that one of your lot got in.</p></blockquote><p>I think the system is askew.  I'll leave it to better brains than mine to figure out how to fix it.</p><p>I remember attending a party workshop once where "delegates" spoke on the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 22:49:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joshua Arbury</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190061#post190061</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190061#post190061</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I think it would be an interesting development if this party did happen. I have been thinking for a while about whether the Greens are helped or harmed by being "left of Labour", or at least being perceived as left of Labour.</p><p>If we look at the Mt Albert byelection…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 22:36:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190060#post190060</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190060#post190060</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Stalin = a megalomaniac<br /> the Shining Path = Maoist<br />the Red Brigades = Marxist/Leninist<br />or the Great Leap Forward  = Maoist</p><p>Well one out of four aint bad.<br />But anyway that's by the by anyway.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 22:32:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>anth</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190058#post190058</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190058#post190058</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hmm, maybe the threshold should be kept but dropped to 1% to save having to explain the Sainte Lague method.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 22:19:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>rodgerd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190053#post190053</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190053#post190053</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Losing a hard close fight is one thing &mdash; and on paper, Wellington Central was always going to be a seat we'd have to hustle hard to win. But being stabbed in the face by your own leader when you've been working your arse off is quite another.</p></blockquote><p>If it's…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 21:30:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>rodgerd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190051#post190051</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190051#post190051</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And I'd be the first to cheer if we discovered an hitherto unknown reservoir of Marxists.</p></blockquote><p>Why?  Because Stalin, the Shining Path, the Red Brigades, or the Great Leap Forward haven't put you off them yet?</p><blockquote><p>It's pretty hard to see any how anyone can call themselves a democrat and…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 21:14:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Just thinking</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190043#post190043</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190043#post190043</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I only voted Greens for their social policies. If this dream flies, they've got my vote.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 19:33:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190040#post190040</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190040#post190040</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Giovanni</p><blockquote><p>And I'd be the first to cheer if we discovered an hitherto unknown reservoir of Marxists.</p></blockquote><p>Well, we do, sort of. Some ended up with the Greens and others ACT. I think Steven Franks was last seen as a National candidate in Wellington, so maybe he is on his…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:59:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190036#post190036</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190036#post190036</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>No, if the people of Wigram got to choose if Phil Clearwater got in or not I would think that was also unfair.</p><p>I wouldn't make a fuss about it no, but that doesn't mean it wouldn't remain unfair.</p><p>Of course, the only reason you're defending the system is that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:17:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190035#post190035</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190035#post190035</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It's only unfair because you don't like him. That doesn't make the system unfair.</p></blockquote><p>You make a fair point.</p><p>But ... Jim Anderton got two MPs off 1.7% of the vote in 2002, and his influence in the Labour government was commensurate with that. Act received markedly fewer votes than…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:15:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nick Kearney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190031#post190031</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190031#post190031</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But I don't want Douglas in Parliament, and I think it's damn unfair that Epsom gets to put him there.</p></blockquote><p>Oh, come on.  Let's face it, if Jim Anderton's Progs got 3.85%, and on the back of Wigram hauled into Parliament an MP you loved but I didn't, I doubt…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 17:56:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190027#post190027</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190027#post190027</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Whereas I would rather have the votes of voters in Epsom count for five times more than those of everyone else than have the votes of ACT voters count for nothing. Universal unfairness is still unfair. Procedural fairness isn't. Any solution which involves restricting people's rights is a backwards step,…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 17:36:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190024#post190024</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190024#post190024</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But sensibly, we would implement the non-waiver of electorate seats by including these parties in the calculation, but not grant them any MPs beyond their electorate wins.</p></blockquote><p>Thanks; that's at least a sensible way of doing it (though still IMHO the wrong solution).</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:36:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190023#post190023</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190023#post190023</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Of course, one could always treat them the same as independents, and take it out of everyone else's representation so as to fix parliament at 120 seats. But this is more disproportionate than the current arrangements, and so not a positive move.</p></blockquote><p>There are other options.</p><p>But let's start with…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:30:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Angus Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190022#post190022</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190022#post190022</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Room ideologically, sure (that space is infinite; one can always play "lefter-than-thou"). But what matters isn't the ideological space, but how many people are in it. That's the core issue a political party has to grapple with. And based on recent voting trends, the answer is "not a lot". At…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:29:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190020#post190020</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190020#post190020</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I believe the right I/S is talking about is the right to have your vote count equally with everyone else. If National gets 20,000 more votes, they get an extra seat. If Bill and Ben get 20,000 more votes they don't.</p></blockquote><p>Yes.  But note that I care about party votes,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:25:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190019#post190019</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190019#post190019</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Graeme, this is where we encounter the problem of people not knowing how the calculations are done. I would say that I know more about our electoral system than the average voter, and I still couldn't have explained exactly how they work out how many seats get allocated to whom.…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:24:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190018#post190018</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190018#post190018</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>if you give everyone who gets 0.00000001% of the party vote a seat...</p></blockquote><p>Well, that's kinda stupid. Even under the craziest system imaginable, I'm pretty sure we wouldn't be having a Parliament where someone with 0.0002 votes gets a seat. Every voter would be personally represented by 4200 MPs.</p><p>I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:18:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190016#post190016</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190016#post190016</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Graeme: another problem with abolishing the electorate lifeboat: it makes overhangs worse.  Much worse.  In the present parliament, we have a 2-seat overhang, which I think we can all agree sucks.  But simply abolishing the electorate lifeboat would mean that balooned to 8 seats: 1 for ACT, 1 for UF,…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:09:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190015#post190015</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190015#post190015</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>He doesn't. That's not what abolition of the threshold involves.</p></blockquote><p>Except that his wording suggested that he considers any limitation on votes leading to representation to be an imposition on one's democratic rights. Which lead me to the conclusion that he did indeed mean that a single vote would be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:08:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190013#post190013</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190013#post190013</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thank you Graeme, I had been trying to get my head around that for years.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:04:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190012#post190012</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190012#post190012</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I/S, it's only a straw man if one doesn't understand how a fixed-size Parliament can end up with over-hang but not have the same effect if you give everyone who gets 0.00000001% of the party vote a seat. Which, as it happens, I didn't.<br />You talk of the threshold as…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:01:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190011#post190011</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190011#post190011</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Is this a feature of of sainte-lague, that smaller parties can get in at about 0.5% of the vote? Should take more like 0.8 shouldn't it?</p></blockquote><p>I'll (over-)simplify it a bit, but yes.</p><p>We have to divvy up 120 seats. If you were to work it out on strict percentages,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 15:48:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190010#post190010</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190010#post190010</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Is this a feature of of sainte-lague, that smaller parties can get in at about 0.5% of the vote? Should take more like 0.8 shouldn't it?</p></blockquote><p>Think of it this way: that 0.4% of the vote is (on straight division) 0.5 of a seat in a 120 seat Parliament.  Which…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 15:47:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mikaere Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190009#post190009</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190009#post190009</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>You'd need around 9000 votes or so to get a seat (factually, given recent turnouts).</p></blockquote><p>This value is skewed by the fact the actual voting totals are filtered for those that get a seat or votes in excess of the threshold.  I just re-ran the Sainte-Laguë formula against all parties,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 15:45:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190007#post190007</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190007#post190007</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Matthew: you can keep your straw man, thanks &ndash; I don't want it.</p><p>The legislated size of Parliament sets an obvious limit on democratic representation.  We have 120 MPs. And as Graeme points out, using St Lague that sets an effective minimum threshold, in the extreme case, of around 0.4%…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 15:40:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190005#post190005</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190005#post190005</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>You'd need around 9000 votes or so to get a seat (factually, given recent turnouts).</p></blockquote><p>I've looked at the figures and don't understand why the system does this.</p><p>At about 2.4 million people voting, 20,000 votes should get you a list seat, assuming most votes 'count'.</p><p>Is this a feature…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 15:25:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190004#post190004</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190004#post190004</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>If you equate not putting a representative into Parliament for every party that gets a single vote with interfering with someone's rights, you've got a fairly interesting definition of "right".</p></blockquote><p>He doesn't. That's not what abolition of the threshold involves. FPP doesn't have a threshold, and still seems to manage.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 15:13:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190003#post190003</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190003#post190003</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Any solution which involves restricting people's rights is a backwards step, not a forward one.</p></blockquote><p>Who's restricting whose rights? You can vote for any party that's listed, or even write in your own if you so choose. The right to vote is not being interfered with or modified in any…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 15:03:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190001#post190001</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190001#post190001</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Are you including New Zealand First in that? Because of lot of their economic policies: reserve bank, protectionism, minimum wage, etc. have been to the left of Labour for some time.</p></blockquote><p>No, I wasn't.  But that was because I was assuming that a "new left" party wouldn't be interested in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:50:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190000#post190000</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=190000#post190000</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>At present, the constituency votes of Epsom voters are worth five times more than the constituency votes of everyone else. Given the option between keeping *this* problem and removing it, I (now) say we get rid of it.</p></blockquote><p>Whereas I would rather have the votes of voters in Epsom count…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:49:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189999#post189999</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189999#post189999</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>At the last election, the "left of Labour" vote was ~182,000 votes</p></blockquote><p>Are you including New Zealand First in that? Because of lot of their economic policies: reserve bank, protectionism, minimum wage, etc. have been to the left of Labour for some time.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:46:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>binary.heart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189998#post189998</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189998#post189998</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"But would the former Alliance's core non-Green voterbase of betrayed former Labour voters have the same problem?"</p><p>&ndash; This one still does.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:45:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>binary.heart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189997#post189997</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189997#post189997</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"And having the conversation started by a major party rather than a minor one makes it harder to dismiss."</p><p>Yup, that's exactly my point. It's not to disregard the part played by other parties and groups, but Labour's adoption for the time being of some of these ideas opens the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:43:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189996#post189996</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189996#post189996</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I was meaning more, despite a couple of statements that Goff has made recently, there seemed to me to be a lot of room to the left of Labour for another party.</p></blockquote><p>Room ideologically, sure (that space is infinite; one can always play "lefter-than-thou").  But what matters isn't the ideological…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:43:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189995#post189995</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189995#post189995</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Sure. But the solution is less unfairness, not more. Retaining the threshold at a non-trivial level while abolishing the "electorate lifeboat" means people who would be represented under the current rules going under-represented. And that makes the problem worse, not better.</p></blockquote><p>That makes *a* problem worse. But if the problem…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:35:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189994#post189994</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189994#post189994</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>There never has been a parliamentary role in this country for an avowedly marxist party, and I do not see one in the future.</p></blockquote><p>Who said anything about Marxist? It's possible to be left of Labour (even left of the new, cuddly Labour) and still be far from Marxist.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:35:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bruce Thorpe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189992#post189992</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189992#post189992</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Hone Harawira is a Maori nationalist.<br />Most of his generation of Maori activists have been uneasy with the Marxists' embrace, and I see nothing of class ideology in the politics of the women he claims to be his main advisors, Titewhai and Hilda.  <br />There never has been a parliamentary role…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:23:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189990#post189990</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189990#post189990</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I was meaning more, despite a couple of statements that Goff has made recently, there seemed to me to be a lot of room to the left of Labour for another party.</p><p>I still struggle to put Labour into the left-wing pile.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:19:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189989#post189989</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189989#post189989</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Somehow when I wasn't looking the real estate on the left shrunk.</p></blockquote><p>More that Labour, in publicly repudiating NeoLiberalism, has occupied more of it.  Though notably, that's only on economic interventionism; they're still leaving that social justice ground vacant.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:09:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189988#post189988</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189988#post189988</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Labour has just eaten their ground</p></blockquote><p>Somehow when I wasn't looking the real estate on the left shrunk.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 13:51:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189986#post189986</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189986#post189986</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>One point I'd make in response to Giovanni is that Labour's 'leftward shift' &ndash; is opening some actual ground for discussion in the political landscape that has been exceedingly hard to dig over of late.</p></blockquote><p>And having the conversation started by a major party rather than a minor one makes…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 13:36:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189985#post189985</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189985#post189985</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It's not going to work this time either. Not with Labour &ndash; at least rhetorically &ndash; pulling so decisively away from the neoliberal reforms. And I'd be the first to cheer if we discovered an hitherto unknown reservoir of Marxists.</p></blockquote><p>And that's the real problem for a new left party:…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 13:33:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>binary.heart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189984#post189984</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189984#post189984</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Amongst other people I know who vote Green in Wellington. There seems to be growing discontent with the MPs and the feeling that the party is moving away from its original feel. Rather than tracing it back to backing Metiria over Sue Bradford, a lot of it is being put…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 13:30:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189982#post189982</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189982#post189982</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Dropping the threshold requirement as soon as a party gets an electorate seat gives us the nonsense of Rodney hauling in Garrett and the Zombie of Parliaments Past whilst Winston gets nothing despite having more popular support. I don't particularly object to Winston getting nothing, but it sure does rankle…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 13:24:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189981#post189981</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189981#post189981</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Well voting alliance back then<br />and then alliance diasseaoed and we had greens as our option if we wanted to pull labour left</p></blockquote><p>It's not going to work this time either. Not with Labour &ndash; at least rhetorically &ndash; pulling so decisively away from the neoliberal reforms. And I'd be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 13:09:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mikaere Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189980#post189980</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189980#post189980</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Basically, Bolger used his last round of media interviews before the '96 election to say National supporters in Wellington Central should give their electorate vote to Richard Prebble in order guarantee ACT being in Parliament. Just to add insult to injury, even if Mark Thomas had won Wellington Central ACT…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 13:08:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sue</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189979#post189979</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189979#post189979</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>That's all very well, but if it takes 1 or 2% off the Greens vote and the Greens don't make into Parliament because of that, it counts for me as a disaster.</p></blockquote><p>that's what everyone used to say about voting greens instead of labour</p><p>Well voting alliance back then<br />and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 13:06:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bryce Edwards</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189978#post189978</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189978#post189978</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>It's pretty hard to see any how anyone can call themselves a democrat and defend the 5% threshold. </p><p>So, yes, let's abolish it, and keep MMP. Then the problematic "one-seat rule" is automatically dealt with.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 13:05:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189976#post189976</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189976#post189976</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Would ACT have crossed the 5% threshold if this hadn't happened? Might not have some ACT voters voted National if they feared their votes would be wasted?</p></blockquote><p>Always difficult to tell, but given that they made it by 1.1% probably unlikely.</p><p>Mark Thomas' story is unusual in that this has…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 13:02:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189974#post189974</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189974#post189974</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Keep MMP, change this single-seat rule. Please.</p></blockquote><p>The solution is either to drop the threshold to some very low value like 1 or 2% (in order to at least keep some level of serious representation), or to require that a party that gets an MP in on an electorate must…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 12:54:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>anth</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189973#post189973</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189973#post189973</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Keep MMP, change this single-seat rule.</p></blockquote><p>Keep MMP, get rid of the 5% threshold.</p><p>Yeah, it'd have been easier for Winston Peters and Graham Capill to get in or stay in but they wouldn't have had much power unless they'd got enough votes to bring a few others in with…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 12:52:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>simon g</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189972#post189972</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189972#post189972</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Oh great, another Electorate Wanted (Lonely Hearts) ad. It seems the first thing pollies ask themselves is not "what do we stand for?" but "where can we stand?". Seat first, values follow.</p><p>Those all-important life-giving Electorate Seats, under MMP:</p><p>Coromandel &ndash; lost.<br />Wellington Central &ndash; lost.<br />Tauranga &ndash; lost.<br />Ohariu-Belmont…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 12:41:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189971#post189971</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189971#post189971</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						+3 on that Tony Sutorius documentary. In which &ndash; bonus fact &ndash; the supremely unctuous Labour candidate Alick Shaw managed to make Prebble and Bolger look like the good guys. Quite an achievement, in the circumstances.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 12:36:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189970#post189970</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189970#post189970</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Craig, would it be possible to elaborate on what took place? I was on my OE in 1996 (which is the election to which you refer?), so I have no idea what took place and why.</p></blockquote><p>Basically, Bolger used his last round of media interviews before the '96 election to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 12:30:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189969#post189969</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189969#post189969</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Bolger screwed over his candidate by not so subtley telling national voters to vote for Richard Prebble in Wellington Central to get ACT into parliament. Wasn't actually needed in the end as ACT crossed the 5% threshold...</p></blockquote><p>Would ACT have crossed the 5% threshold if this hadn't happened? Might not…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 12:17:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tim Hannah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189968#post189968</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189968#post189968</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Craig, would it be possible to elaborate on what took place?</p></blockquote><p>If I remember correctly, Mark Thomas (National candidate) failed to hold his support and hence didn't deserve to be in Parliament. Why his supporters would complain about an outsiders role in his defeat is beyond me.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 12:15:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189967#post189967</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189967#post189967</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Maori sovereignty would fit within that ideological space, which is where Harawira would come in.</p></blockquote><p>I'm dubious that Harawira is a one issue person though. As well as believing in Maori Sovereignty, he believes in a bunch of other things which aren't particularly left wing. Like others I can't see…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 12:06:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189966#post189966</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189966#post189966</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Craig, would it be possible to elaborate on what took place?</p></blockquote><p>There was a relatively good film festival movie on it called <a href="http://www.unreal.co.nz/product.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">campaign</a>.</p><p>Basically Bolger screwed over his candidate by not so subtley telling national voters to vote for Richard Prebble in Wellington Central to get ACT into parliament. Wasn't…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 12:04:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danyl Mclauchlan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189965#post189965</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189965#post189965</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I was on my OE in 1996 (which is the election to which you refer?), so I have no idea what took place and why.</p></blockquote><p>Then you should definitely check out <em>Campaign</em> the documentary about the 1996 Wellington Central election. It will answer all of your questions and happens to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 12:01:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189964#post189964</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189964#post189964</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						There are a number of people close to the Greens who would like to see Bradford start a proper social justice party. Their feeling is that the new Greens leadership don't give sufficient levels of anything resembling a damn about the socially disadvantaged, and that's borne out by things like…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 11:59:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mikaere Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189961#post189961</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189961#post189961</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I was on the ground in Wellington Central when we saw our own candidate fucked over quite literally in the last moments of the campaign a few weeks before he went into coalition with someone he'd previously (and coreectly) damned as a racist.</p></blockquote><p>Craig, would it be possible to elaborate…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 11:49:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189960#post189960</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189960#post189960</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Want to go there, dearest?</p></blockquote><p>I'm happy to go there, your comment did nothing to invalidate my objection &ndash; the opposite, if anything.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 11:44:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bryce Edwards</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189958#post189958</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189958#post189958</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>On the day that Matt McCarten announced his entry to the Mana by-election campaign, I blogged some analysis of whether this meant the ‘The launch of a New Left Party?’. See here: <a href="http://liberation.typepad.com/liberation/2010/10/matt-mccarten-for-mana-the-return-of-the-left.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://liberation.typepad.com/liberation/2010/10/matt-mccarten-for-mana-the-return-of-the-left.html</a></p><p>Here’s an excerpt:</p><p>“This has been his plan ever since the Alliance disintegrated. Building the Unite union…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 11:39:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189956#post189956</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189956#post189956</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Apparently the party you're a member of thought that Act deserved to be in Parliament and made sure it would.</p></blockquote><p>Want to go there, dearest?  I was on the ground in Wellington Central when we saw our own candidate fucked over quite literally in the last moments of the campaign…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 11:37:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189954#post189954</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189954#post189954</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I rather think, though, that David Garrett has <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10685311" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">other things to worry about</a> at the moment</p></blockquote><p>I'm not so sure.</p><p>Section 76 of the <a href="http://www.paclii.org/to/legis/consol_act/mca232/index.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Magistrates' Courts Act</a> (of Tonga) seems pretty clear on this point. The conviction of a person in Garrett's position is stayed pending the disposition of an appeal.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 11:28:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mikaere Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189953#post189953</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189953#post189953</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>We already have one, considering Winston Peters still has the Press Gallery inexplicably fawning over him.</p></blockquote><p>There is an aspect to this which could be a Good Thing.  It is quite clear that the Key Government have been spreading FUD about MMP, and that Key would like to move to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 11:26:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189950#post189950</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189950#post189950</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Up to a point, but if the Greens don't hold their support (which seems fairly solid, with all the usual caveats around polling) they don't deserve to be in Parliament. Nobody does.</p></blockquote><p>Apparently the party you're a member of thought that Act deserved to be in Parliament and made sure…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 11:22:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mikaere Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189949#post189949</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189949#post189949</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>When Eddie wrote:</p><blockquote><p>I’m putting a lot of credence in the rumours, because they’ve come at us from different sources and I think the party has a viable business case.</p></blockquote><p>I thought maybe it's just a twitter meme.</p><p>If Sue and Matt do set up a party, it is possible…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 11:21:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189948#post189948</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189948#post189948</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>David Farrar has headlined a post on the matter It's only official when it is denied,</p></blockquote><p>David Farrar shags farm animals.  Come on, big boy, deny that.</p><blockquote><p>That's all very well, but if it takes 1 or 2% off the Greens vote and the Greens don't make into Parliament because…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 11:18:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189946#post189946</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189946#post189946</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						That's all very well, but if it takes 1 or 2% off the Greens vote and the Greens don't make into Parliament because of that, it counts for me as a disaster, much as I'd pick Bradford and McCarten's politics  over Turei and Norman's.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 11:10:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Raymond A Francis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189943#post189943</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189943#post189943</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yes it would be interesting to have a true left wing party<br />But it would surely need Hone to get it into Parliment, the electorate really isn't that left leaning, <br />Mind you lets test that comment by putting it to the voters</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 11:01:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189942#post189942</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-new-old-left/?p=189942#post189942</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 11:01:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
