<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Hard News: Meanwhile back at the polls</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=315848#post315848</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=315848#post315848</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Mixed Meme Presentations?</strong><br />Spot the difference:<br />Two sets of illusionists are looking for public support in September…<br />and Picard's lot are always available on disk ...</p><p>The Next Generation has definitely arrived!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2014 09:28:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=315844#post315844</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=315844#post315844</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>going gangly busters…</strong><br /><q>Or This???  …<br />Argggghhh</q><br />which encourages <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/10185321/Thanks-very-much-for-the-kind-donation" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">logic like this…</a><br /><q> Laurence Day has given $175,000 to the Conservative Party “and there’ll be more to come”. The cashed-up Hamilton businessman is furious that Kim Dotcom is trying to buy political influence in New Zealand. So Day is putting his…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2014 08:36:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=315822#post315822</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=315822#post315822</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I will like totally freak you out with ideas like using a spanner as a hammer in the work place. Or operating a bandsaw when I’m wearing my pajamas.</q><br /> Or This??? <br />And they say the Greens are scary<br />Argggghhh</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2014 12:28:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=315817#post315817</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=315817#post315817</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Shearer looked far from Prime Ministerial. </q><br />That is purely because we, as New Zealanders, have come to expect our PM to be a show pony that drinks beersies at barbies, takes the piss out of serious issues and thinks we are not interested in anything other than money.<br />I think…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2014 11:25:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=315749#post315749</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=315749#post315749</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yes, what's it at now? 49.5% Nat, 28% Lab? But the buzz has shifted to the Stuff poll putting the Nats on 56% and Labour on 23%. To get a discrepancy of 6.5% in two polls around the same period tells me that they either aren't using anywhere near the…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2014 12:45:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=315744#post315744</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=315744#post315744</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>My opinion is that it is an outlier poll, we will know in another 2 weeks- I thought it looked to much like the random sample happened to hit a lot of National voters and few Green voters- I just didn’t see the Greens doing anything in those two weeks…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2014 12:28:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=315068#post315068</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=315068#post315068</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks for that.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 12:12:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=315066#post315066</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=315066#post315066</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>this story from The Press this morning makes me wonder what’s going on even more. Specifically — “a joint research project by the Taxpayers Union and Fairfax Media”.</q><br />A bit more depth <a href="http://rebuildingchristchurch.wordpress.com/2014/06/11/on-the-selective-accountability-of-spending-other-peoples-money/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 12:06:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=315057#post315057</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=315057#post315057</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Libertarian lobbyists equating performance with not spending, demanding asset sales &ndash; hardly news by now, you'd think. Being able to subsidise struggling media organisations must be an enticing enough carrot to excuse the slant, I guess.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 11:25:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=315050#post315050</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=315050#post315050</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Williams is a classic rent-a-quote. He’ll fire out inane press releases and respond to journalists’ calls even when he doesn’t know what he’s talking about.</q></p><p>Sorry to stray from the original topic, but <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/10142192/CCC-debt-three-times-NZ-average" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this story from The Press this morning</a> makes me wonder what's going on even more.  Specifically ---…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:45:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314997#post314997</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314997#post314997</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>A fall in the House of Usher?</q></p><p>Russell, we need a <strong>"LOL"</strong> button...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 14:52:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314996#post314996</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314996#post314996</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Scary? What kind of chicken shit do you have to be made of.</q></p><p>+100  Score, Stephen!  :-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 14:50:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314993#post314993</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314993#post314993</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I need to edgeler this bit</q></p><p>I suspect "edgeler" will be in the running for WOTY for 2014</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 14:43:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314928#post314928</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314928#post314928</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>    <br /><em>I wonder if Roy Morgan<br />and Val Morgan are related?</em></p><p>How about Captain Morgan?</q></p><p>I see you're keeping with the spirit of Ian's humour.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:41:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Pete George</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314927#post314927</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314927#post314927</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Craig may not get a lot of confidence from Key if his public statemenst are all there is to go on.<br /><q>Asked whether he was willing still to do an electorate deal for Craig, Key said “he hasn’t approached me”, but believed Craig was not seeking such an arrangement, citing…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:38:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Roger Lacey</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314923#post314923</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314923#post314923</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I wonder if Roy Morgan <br />and Val Morgan are related?</q></p><p>How about Captain Morgan?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:21:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tim Michie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314920#post314920</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314920#post314920</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm encouraged by Craig's lack of confidence he could win by virtue of his own campaign and policies.  National looked wary of these deals and I hope this prevails and Craig is correct.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:17:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sanya Baker</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314918#post314918</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314918#post314918</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						If Colin Craig manages an electorate "accommodation" I wouldn't see his entry to Parliament as anything other than buying his way in &ndash; he certainly purchased most of the media attention he has garnered over the last 6 years with his own personal fortune.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:14:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314901#post314901</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314901#post314901</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>...one of them is dead</q><br />A fall in the House of Usher?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:44:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314900#post314900</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314900#post314900</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						When he or she is referring to media reports, probably not.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:41:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314899#post314899</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314899#post314899</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Should it worry us when a statistician says he's seen something happen <q>more times than I can count </q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:33:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mr Mark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314896#post314896</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314896#post314896</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Cheers, Andrew. Appreciate you going to the trouble to clarify things.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:32:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Geoff Lealand</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314894#post314894</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314894#post314894</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I know one of them is dead.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:15:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314893#post314893</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314893#post314893</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I wonder if Roy Morgan <br />and Val Morgan are related?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:08:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314890#post314890</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314890#post314890</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I’d be interested to know if the same is true of those excluded from the Colmar Brunton because they said they were more likely than not to stay at home this election.</q></p><p>Those figures aren’t shown because the base for unlikely-to-vote(rs) is really small, especially after excluding the undecideds/refused to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 07:30:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mr Mark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314889#post314889</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314889#post314889</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>No, I certainly don't see Undecideds as a bad thing either.</p><p>I'm really more interested in what methodology <em>Roy Morgan</em> use to end up with such an unusually low proportion.</p><p>As far as  likely non-voters go (  <em>separate</em>  , of course, from undecideds, though partially overlapping), it would be nice…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 06:55:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Pete George</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314888#post314888</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314888#post314888</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>As a point of anecdata, I had a conversation with an in-law who used to vote Labour but wouldn’t this time because he thought The Greens would then get to control the country.</p><p>It isn’t the first time I have heard that. It’s an interesting and frustrating situation for both…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 06:45:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314887#post314887</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314887#post314887</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Perhaps, unlike Colmar Brunton , they (Roy Morgan) don’t ask about intention-to-vote, and therefore don’t exclude those unlikely to vote ?</q></p><p>It's very possible they don't filter on likelihood to vote, but I don't <em>think</em> that would make the difference because the % of undecideds in the CB poll is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 06:28:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mr Mark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314886#post314886</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314886#post314886</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>"There's nothing in particular wrong with the company's methodology"</em></p><p>The thing that really intrigues me about <em>Roy Morgan</em> is their <em>unusually small</em> proportion of Undecideds &ndash; consistently <em>far</em> lower relative to the other 4 public polls. </p><p>I'm wondering if they follow Andrew's <em>One News Clomar Brunton</em> modus operandi in prompting…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 02:16:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314885#post314885</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314885#post314885</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I’m sure there’s a constituency out there for a Disenchanted Party<br />but I suspect more votes would be attracted to a Social Party.</p><p>(Meanwhile, those thinking of a Public Address Party would be well advised to consider the acronym carefully, regardless of the idea’s obvious merits.)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 00:44:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>martinb</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314884#post314884</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314884#post314884</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I've thought- completely non-seriously- about starting a GST Taxpayers Union seeing as how we are not represented in the net tax figures. And how there are so many of us.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 23:06:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314881#post314881</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314881#post314881</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The way I see it, it seems the internet party is happily hacking the system,<br />and with Mana have now created an open source Trojan Horse</p><p>Stuxnet for electoral processes<br />(actually that might be The Civilian Party)</p><p>But no sleight of hand<br />all above board, Trickster stuff<br />Jones was Loki…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 19:16:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Deborah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314880#post314880</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314880#post314880</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Mike Smith has now posted his follow-up. He begins:</p><p>David Cunliffe badly needs a new stump speech. On Thursday in Whanganui I heard him depress a large and sympathetic audience for ten minutes with tales of national woe, then promise a positive campaign but give no details.<br /></q></p><p>I was in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 19:01:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tinakori</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314879#post314879</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314879#post314879</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Jones was a guy who happened to be both a great communicator and wealthy and rode a wave of discontent to create a high profile for his NZ Party, a more incisive version of Winston or Jim Anderton (the last of whom he once described as his closest friend in…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 18:33:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314878#post314878</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314878#post314878</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Williams is a classic rent-a-quote. He’ll fire out inane press releases and respond to journalists’ calls even when he doesn’t know what he’s talking about.</q></p><p>True. I don't think I'd mind so much if he didn't purport to be speaking for me, and apparently for every person in NZ who…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 18:17:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314877#post314877</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314877#post314877</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Robert Jones</q></p><p>Good point.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 17:58:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314876#post314876</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314876#post314876</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>no single individual has attempted to buy a political agenda in NZ in quite this way before</q></p><p>Robert Jones</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 17:42:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314873#post314873</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314873#post314873</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Williams is a classic rent-a-quote. He'll fire out inane press releases and respond to journalists' calls even when he doesn't know what he's talking about. His Tax Day release was so incoherent as to be bonkers.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 17:20:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314872#post314872</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314872#post314872</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I’m dismayed by the way the mainstream media use the prime minister as a political commentator and allow him to put his spin on other parties’ policies without question.</q></p><p>I feel similarly about how Jordan Williams is increasingly being used as a spokesperson for "all taxpayers", apparently by reason of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 16:59:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Roger Lacey</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314871#post314871</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314871#post314871</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm dismayed by the way the mainstream media use the prime minister as a political commentator and allow him to put his spin on other parties' policies without question.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 16:20:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Pete George</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314868#post314868</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314868#post314868</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The thing about all this that unsettles me the most is the demonstration provided by the Internet Party of how much campaign funding matters, even in NZ politics.</q><br />Funding helps but it's not necessarily an election winner.</p><p>Last election the Conservative Party spent $1.88 million, more than any other party…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 15:58:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Grant Taylor</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314865#post314865</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314865#post314865</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The risk is that the hoopla from one small, <em>rich</em> party will get a good deal of attention and bring some welcome novelty</q></p><p>The thing about all this that unsettles me the most is the demonstration provided by the Internet Party of how much campaign funding matters, even in NZ…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 15:33:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314861#post314861</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314861#post314861</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If another couple of polls agree with this then Key may be tempted to use the Banks debacle as an excuse for an early election.</q></p><p>That's extremely unlikely. All of the mechanisms for an election have been set in place (by the Electoral Commission, parties, media, others) and we're just…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 14:30:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Euan Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314853#post314853</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314853#post314853</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						If another couple of polls agree with this then Key may be tempted to use the Banks debacle as an excuse for an early election.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 13:42:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314842#post314842</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314842#post314842</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>As you can see, there are a few gaps here and there.</q></p><p>Pretty good start, though. Righteous work, sir.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 12:41:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314837#post314837</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314837#post314837</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						My opinion is that it is an outlier poll, we will know in another 2 weeks- I thought it looked to much like the random sample happened to hit a lot of National voters and few Green voters- I just didn't see the Greens doing anything in those two weeks…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 12:17:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Allan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314833#post314833</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314833#post314833</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I've have to keep reminding my folks that the climate change denial from Leighton Smith is downright irresponsible. I sometimes wonder if he's breaching broadcasting standards: "Talkback radio will not usually be subject to the accuracy standard, except where the presenter makes an unqualified statement of fact."
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 11:27:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Pete George</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314832#post314832</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314832#post314832</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Mike Smith has now posted his follow-up. He begins:<br /><q>David Cunliffe badly needs a new stump speech. On Thursday in Whanganui I heard him depress a large and sympathetic audience for ten minutes with tales of national woe, then promise a positive campaign but give no details. </q><br />And later:<br /><q>Too…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 11:24:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Allan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314831#post314831</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314831#post314831</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I think there is something strange going on out there particularly in the older (voting) public. It seems that there is very little acceptance that The Greens have shed their more extreme views and are now a much more serious party and hence more reasonable.</q></p><p>Listening to ever-popular NewstalkZB, particularly…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 11:18:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314830#post314830</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314830#post314830</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>...this degree of difference (consistently around 5% points at the last election)</q></p><p>Perhaps the standard for how precise polls should be is set too high. I'm not sure about what poll you are talking about, but I was fairly impressed by how well some of them did at the last…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 11:17:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Pete George</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314828#post314828</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314828#post314828</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>It wasn't two days in advance. It was initially posted at Trade Me at 3:04 pm Wednesday 4 June. That evening I searched Roy Morgan (in various ways) with no sign of any published results.</p><p>I found published results the following afternoon, as did someone who posted the link on…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 11:10:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314825#post314825</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314825#post314825</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>You know, since the dawn of population survey research the samples have been flawed. This hasn’t just come about in recent times because of increasing land line non-coverage. Land line non-coverage is just one of many potential sources of error, and in my view it’s not the most important one.</q>…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 11:01:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314824#post314824</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314824#post314824</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I’m becoming more and more convinced that there is serious landline bias, but I don’t believe it’s the saviour of anyone.</q></p><p>Hi George</p><p>You know, since the dawn of population survey research the samples have been flawed. This hasn't just come about in recent times because of increasing land line…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 10:41:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Henry Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314823#post314823</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314823#post314823</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>a regular poster had the exact headline results of the Roy Morgan two days in advance.</q></p><p>One can get ahead of the media on this by using `follow that page'.  I saw them on Thursday last week.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 10:32:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314822#post314822</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314822#post314822</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>When they all move together, that’s what we expect — it’s not evidence that the swings are real.</q></p><p>I just looked at the last 4 movements in GCR, and compared them to voting intention in favour of parties in the current Government.</p><p>+8.5 (GCR), +8 (Gvt.)<br />+3.5 (GCR), +2.5 (Gvt.)…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 10:29:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314821#post314821</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314821#post314821</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Purely for informational purposes, here's Mike Williams'... um, <em>interesting</em> musings on <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&amp;objectid=11269719" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">that Missing Million we're probably going to hear a lot more about</a>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 10:20:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Green</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314820#post314820</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314820#post314820</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And, significantly, the swing is reflected in the regular Government Confidence Rating</q></p><p>I need to edgeler this bit. If your outlier poll has sampled too many National voters, then you'll get increases in party vote, preferred PM, and govt confidence. When they all move together, that's what we expect —…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 10:18:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alec Morgan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314819#post314819</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314819#post314819</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Some truth but not stonkingly major truth is my attitude to polls given the disparity between the actual 2011 election results and main polls prior predictions. Last week at TradeMe message board, a rather tawdry National friendly place, a regular poster had the exact headline results of the Roy Morgan…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 10:18:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314818#post314818</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314818#post314818</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I don’t think the spluttering was really that coherent, but it probably is true that a large-ish group of non-tribal voters sees a multi-party centre-left coalition possibly relying on New Zealand First and Kim Dotcom as less secure than what they currently have with National.</q></p><p>Quite possibly &ndash; and I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 10:15:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314817#post314817</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314817#post314817</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Polls bounce. The last poll may have been up a lot – 13.5% is well into the upper range of current Green polling – and thus the actual drop may be less. In the order of 20 or so voters saying that they would vote for someone else on the…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 10:13:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314816#post314816</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314816#post314816</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>As a point of anecdata, I had a conversation with an in-law who used to vote Labour but wouldn’t this time because he thought The Greens would then get to control the country.</q></p><p>Quite so. There are likely to be many, and private polling by Labour (they wouldn't have money…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 10:05:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Henry Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314815#post314815</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314815#post314815</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						But getting back to the poll, isn't it the case the `shocker' is the drop in the Greens number?  From 13.5 to 9?  The Labour number, at 29, is not much different from where it has been hovering, around 30,  all this year.   An outlier? Quite likely, in my view.…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 10:02:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314814#post314814</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314814#post314814</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>As a point of anecdata, I had a conversation with an in-law who used to vote Labour but wouldn't this time because he thought The Greens would then get to control the country.</p><p>It isn't the first time I have heard that. It's an interesting and frustrating situation for both…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 09:53:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314813#post314813</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314813#post314813</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q><br />I don’t think the spluttering was really that coherent, but it probably is true that a large-ish group of non-tribal voters sees a multi-party centre-left coalition possibly relying on New Zealand First and Kim Dotcom as less secure than what they currently have with National.<br /></q></p><p>This is something I have…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 09:51:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314808#post314808</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314808#post314808</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>As you can see, there are a few gaps here and there.</q></p><p>Indeed!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 09:34:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314807#post314807</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314807#post314807</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I've tried to compare the methods used by different polling companies, using info I can find in the public domain. As you can see, there are a few gaps here and there.</p><p><a href="http://grumpollie.wordpress.com/nz-public-poll-methods-grid/ " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> Public poll methods grid</a></p><p>(Although I've mentioned this here before, it's probably important to state for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 09:21:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314805#post314805</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314805#post314805</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It’s possible that this is an outlier poll</q></p><p>Yep.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 09:17:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Pete George</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314804#post314804</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314804#post314804</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>...despite Cunliffe unquestionably looking more confident, competent and potentially Prime Ministerial than Shearer ever did.</q><br />But the Shearer standard is not very hard to beat.</p><p>Cunliffe's confidence seems to vary quite a bit and has been noticeably knocked at times.</p><p>Competence (or lack thereof) is one of Labour's biggest hurdles.Cunliffe…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 09:11:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314803#post314803</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314803#post314803</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> ...there’s nothing in particular wrong with the company’s methodology.</q></p><p>I agree this is probably correct, but it would be nice if they did actually give a few details about their methodology somewhere.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 09:11:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Pete George</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314802#post314802</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314802#post314802</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>...but it probably is true that a large-ish group of non-tribal voters sees a multi-party centre-left coalition possibly relying on New Zealand First and Kim Dotcom as less secure than what they currently have with National. They don’t even have to greatly like National to feel that way.</q><br />I think…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 09:02:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314801#post314801</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-meanwhile-back-at-the-polls/?p=314801#post314801</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 09:02:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
