<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Hard News: Gower Speaks</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=310291#post310291</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=310291#post310291</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Philip K Dick eat yer heart out…</q></p><p>Plus the  <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=11236024" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">  Veterans’ Support Bill</a><br />Although this Bill is better than the !954(?) Act, can we at least recognize the efforts these people have made without insisting they be disabled to receive full recognition. Their time left here is short and to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:20:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=310269#post310269</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=310269#post310269</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>back to the future...</strong><br /><q> ...the recent Simon Bridges and Victoria Forest Park thing, </q></p><p>Not to mention that apparently Bridges has returned from an alternate reality where Russel Norman has been a Minister in Government!</p><p>Just how much time does he spend there?</p><p>Philip K Dick eat yer heart out...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 07:23:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=310251#post310251</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=310251#post310251</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> it’s a shame that both TVNZ and Fairfax have so far completely ignored the entire thing.</q></p><p>Plus I only saw one article in Herald about the PM's view on it. He thinks its fine of course.TV3 seem to be covering it. Weird.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 21:36:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=310234#post310234</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=310234#post310234</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						In some reluctant defence of Patrick Gower (whose style I still find annoying), I’ve appreciated his and his team’s analysis of the <a href="http://www.3news.co.nz/Opinion-Is-Simon-Bridges-asleep-on-the-job/tabid/1382/articleID/339430/Default.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the recent Simon Bridges and Victoria Forest Park thing</a>, which I think is spot on, if repetitive, and it’s a shame that both TVNZ and Fairfax have so…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:42:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=310097#post310097</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=310097#post310097</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>estimated the half-time score using crowd noise and smoke signals</q></p><p>Treasury, then</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 21:23:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ChrisW</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309991#post309991</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309991#post309991</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Catch-up reading &ndash; <br />What on earth was going on up-thread a few days ago, all that intensive statistical analysis of recent opinion poll data &ndash; but then expressing the results <em> as if they related to the outcome of the election in September? </em></p><p>It's as if a bunch of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 11:16:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309874#post309874</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309874#post309874</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And another one bites <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/9915755/Veteran-MP-Tau-Henare-retiring/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the dust</a></p><p><q>Going into caucus this morning Key said: "He's a colourful character. We've enjoyed having him in caucus but it makes sense for him at this time to step down."</q><br />Pushed? Much?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 12:44:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309871#post309871</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309871#post309871</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>They look reasonable consistent over shorter periods (an election cycle), although I haven’t formally tested this.</q></p><p>That does make sense, since until an election they don't have any information upon which to judge their house bias for any methodological change. I'd hope they'd want to stick to a methodology throughout…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 12:27:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Green</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309863#post309863</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309863#post309863</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>For example, are they consistent for a given research house over some years?</q></p><p>No, not consistent over a long time period (multiple election cycles). The polling firms are always trying to improve their methods, so we wouldn't expect them to be.</p><p>They look reasonable consistent over shorter periods (an election…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 11:47:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309789#post309789</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309789#post309789</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Speaking of good questions…</strong><br /><a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1403/S00104/murray-horton-speaking-tour-march-31-may-29.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Cafca’s Murray Horton</a> is on a nationwide pre-election speaking tour, talking to the vital question:<br /><em>Who’s Running The Show? And In Whose Interests?</em></p><p>Golden Bay – Mon April 14<br />Nelson – Tues April 15 <br />(This is <a href="http://watchblogaotearoa.blogspot.co.nz/2014/02/may-worst-man-win.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The 2013 Roger Award Presentation Event</a> – not the talk)…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 16:57:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JonathanM</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309787#post309787</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309787#post309787</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I might have missed discussion of this, but are there any references you (or others) can point me to which discuss these house effects in more detail? I’m getting curious.</p><p>For example, are they consistent for a given research house over some years? How consistent? Could some sort of model…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 16:44:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309784#post309784</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309784#post309784</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						As an aside, I am signed up to answer those horizon polls. I haven't been asked lately to answer any of them. I still answer a few others but not political ones. Why?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 16:11:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309781#post309781</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309781#post309781</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1404/S00097/majority-think-national-will-win-election-prefer-labour.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> Perceptions Pah!</a> :)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 15:57:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309773#post309773</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309773#post309773</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>weighting scheme?</q></p><p>that’s what I’ve seen mentioned.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 14:36:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309769#post309769</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309769#post309769</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>6. All of the above + other stuff</q></p><p>Just a partially formed thought:</p><p>Could “other stuff” include a different model which postulates that people move in or out of main party support (lumped together – although not in voter’s minds!) versus minor party support (lumped together) depending on what they…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 14:07:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309768#post309768</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309768#post309768</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The average house-effect for the Greens from Peter Green’s poll of polls is 0.46%, so not as high as other parties, but around 1/2 of a seat. Roy Morgan is at 1.2% and Fairfax Media Ipsos at -0.2%</q></p><p>I might have missed discussion of this, but are there any references…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 13:58:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JonathanM</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309761#post309761</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309761#post309761</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>5. The correlation is partly due to the fact that the party vote is necessarily dependent (they add to 100%).</p><p>Turns out that when you take this into account, the movement of Labour/National is unsurprising, but some of the others are (e.g. Green/National is higher than you'd expect).  If the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 12:35:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309759#post309759</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309759#post309759</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Interesting idea Sofie.</q></p><p>Not really, I don't have a lot in common with Winston or NZF and I think some of their views are a little extreme, but I'm starting to see how extreme gets one noticed in Politics and that in itself seems to be a strategy.<br />What I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 12:26:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309742#post309742</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309742#post309742</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>that’s because their vote reflects either National or Labour weakness, and they tend to gain from their disaffection.</q></p><p>It's hard to be sure if that story is true. Greens are not strongly correlated to Labour, but they are to National, negatively.</p><p>I see a bunch of possible explanations:<br />1. The…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 10:14:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309741#post309741</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309741#post309741</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What would persuade him a Labour led government would best achieve his goals?</q></p><p>Labour and the Greens approaching him and negotiating in good faith, I'd think. It's the only thing that would convince <em>me</em> that it would be a good idea. Essentially they give a blueprint of their bottom line…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 10:02:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309740#post309740</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309740#post309740</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Especially as NZF and Green are, as Ben puts it, `positively correlated’?</q></p><p>They are correlated, but that actually makes their voters different to each other. When the vote of one goes up, so does the vote of the other &ndash; that's because their vote reflects either National or Labour weakness,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 09:58:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Australopithecus</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309739#post309739</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309739#post309739</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So get on ya horse and tell him</q></p><p>Interesting idea Sofie.</p><p>I would never had thought to write to Winston Peters (I’m not what you would call his core constituency).</p><p>He and I might not share many common values, but we do agree on the detrimental influence foreign investment is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 09:29:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JonathanM</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309738#post309738</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309738#post309738</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The average house-effect for the Greens from Peter Green's poll of polls is 0.46%, so not as high as other parties, but around 1/2 of a seat.  Roy Morgan is at 1.2% and  Fairfax Media Ipsos at -0.2%.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 08:27:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309730#post309730</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309730#post309730</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I can't see much to support his claim that the polls are way too kind on the Greens. I can only think he's talking about reasonably long time ago. But he's right about his own support being consistently underestimated by polls, and National's being overestimated.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 23:26:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Henry Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309721#post309721</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309721#post309721</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>On the question of “What will Winston do?”, the data I think would be most relevant that could be collected is “What do NZF voters want him to do?”. If a strong and clear majority want him to go with National, that makes it very much more likely. Because he’d…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 20:39:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309720#post309720</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309720#post309720</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=11233295" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> Winston talks about the Polls</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 19:42:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309718#post309718</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309718#post309718</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Ok, but Mike Williams did offer <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&amp;objectid=11216530" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> this</a> as a way of explaining what I presume you mean.<br />It's politics as we know it.</p><p><q>As I facilitated the donation in question, I can report &ndash; for the first time &ndash; that Peters was in fact telling the strict truth.</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 18:44:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309714#post309714</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309714#post309714</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>In reality what might be happening is Labour is taking 2% off National while Greens are taking 2% off Labour. Unless you had a panel you regularly poll and track the changes there would be no way of knowing.</q></p><p>Bingo. I’d call it a longitudinal study, market research companies call…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 17:15:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bmk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309713#post309713</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309713#post309713</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>He says he is not the Party. He is the leader of NZFirst and would like others to treat him as that rather than the only one in the Party. He stressed that he is in a Party the last time I heard him. If that seems to be different…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 17:13:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309712#post309712</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309712#post309712</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Here is my nightmare scenario. Winston decides to go with National </q></p><p>So get on ya horse and tell him. Or, by your lovely gravatar, maybe not the horse. Their Website is easy to find and email is even easier. Power to the peoples. We are not sheeples!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 17:05:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309711#post309711</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309711#post309711</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Anyway what I’m trying to say is I think Winston will do whatever he wants –</q></p><p>He says he is not the Party. He is the leader of NZFirst and would like others to treat him as that rather than the only one in the Party. He <em>stressed</em> that he…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 16:58:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bmk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309709#post309709</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309709#post309709</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>On the question of "What will Winston do?", the data I think would be most relevant that could be collected is "What do NZF voters want him to do?". If a strong and clear majority want him to go with National, that makes it very much more likely. Because he'd…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 16:00:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309708#post309708</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309708#post309708</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Colin Craig needs every fraction of a percent he can get.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 15:58:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JonathanM</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309707#post309707</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309707#post309707</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>One thing I noticed &ndash; the scale on the scatter plots are not the same.  The large movements across in the Conservatives column are actually pretty meaningless, as they're only fractions of a percent.</p><p>The updated one has constant scales (same patterns, just a bit easier to see the impact).…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 15:16:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Australopithecus</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309706#post309706</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309706#post309706</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Here is my nightmare scenario.  Winston decides to go with National &ndash; on the condition of John Key’s scalp.  Key retires to Hawaii a hero, the guy who took one for the team.</p><p>Winston can be a minister, in or out of cabinet, in any post that does not affect…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 14:46:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309705#post309705</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309705#post309705</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It must over time (of the constant belittling of him from KeyCo.) have a small effect as to which way you could turn.</q></p><p>I doubt he likes Key, but that would make it all the sweeter to have him on his knees, begging for forgiveness. He could also be in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 14:37:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309704#post309704</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309704#post309704</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I would suggest there are a few in Parliament with strong egos and Winston will fall into that category. It must over time (of the constant belittling of him from KeyCo.) have a small effect as to which way you could turn. As Peters has worked with Labour before, and…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 13:11:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309702#post309702</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309702#post309702</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						On the question of "What will Winston do?", the data I think would be most relevant that <em>could</em> be collected is "What do NZF voters want him to do?". If a strong and clear majority want him to go with National, that makes it very much more likely. Because he'd…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 12:49:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309701#post309701</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309701#post309701</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>In reality what might be happening is Labour is taking 2% off National while Greens are taking 2% off Labour.</q></p><p>Good point. Or there could be movements in and out of non-voting between choices. I can imagine that's not that uncommon. You stop being a tribal Labour voter, but have…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 12:32:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Pete George</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309700#post309700</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309700#post309700</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"I suspect that various folk that collect polls (e.g. David Farrar?) may already have the data"</p><p>@dpfdpf Apr 2 "I have all the public poll data back to 1974. I should point out I didn't start collecting them in 1974 though, as I was just 7 :-)"</p><p>Some are having…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 12:29:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bmk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309699#post309699</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309699#post309699</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Those are great graphics. Only thing is we don't really know what's going on in the background. Say in one poll. National loses 2%, Labour stays level and Greens gain 2%. The scatterplots would treat that as Greens taking votes off National right?</p><p>In reality what might be happening is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 11:49:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JonathanM</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309698#post309698</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309698#post309698</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Unfortunately the data source that Peter uses (wikipedia) doesn't contain that information.  It would be interesting to form a fuller picture of what is going on in the polls, and would be useful information to add in to the scenario generation.</p><p>I suspect that various folk that collect polls (e.g.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 11:34:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309697#post309697</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309697#post309697</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And wow, thanks too. That's a great infographic. Any possibility of having the non-vote relationships there too? I'm really interested to see if there's any correlations between not-voting and the fortunes of any particular parties. My guess is that there would be a negative one for the Greens and NZF,…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 11:25:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JonathanM</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309696#post309696</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309696#post309696</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						A+ :)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 11:21:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JonathanM</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309695#post309695</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309695#post309695</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>For the other linked graph here: <a href="http://imgur.com/6QlKxfm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://imgur.com/6QlKxfm</a></p><p>What this is showing in the middle (the black smudgy bit) is the number of seats (scales are seats) that the left or right achieve in simulated elections.  i.e. it shows that as the number of seats on the left increase, the seats…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 11:20:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309694#post309694</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309694#post309694</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hah, so my eyes were not fooling me! Greens and NZF are positively correlated!!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 11:18:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309693#post309693</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309693#post309693</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Not sure exactly. It looks like a scatterplot of Left vs Right totals, which are obviously going to be strongly negatively correlated. There is also a left and right probability density shown by the colored histograms. </p><p>Now I'm hitting total guesswork: I think the light blue band is an outright…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 11:16:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JonathanM</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309692#post309692</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309692#post309692</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						For the scatter plot, I’ve done with with the bias-corrected polls, just to make sure that the results aren’t coming from some polling firms consistently under estimating one party while over estimating the other (that’d produce a trend in the plots that doesn’t really exist, assuming the bias estimation is…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 11:11:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309691#post309691</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309691#post309691</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks. What about the other linked graph?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 10:17:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309689#post309689</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309689#post309689</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Wow. Can you explain those a bit please.</q></p><p>I can tell you what they are, but I'm only guessing how to use them. They're scatterplots, each plotting one party against one other party. The dots are individual polls and the x val is one of the parties, the y val…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 23:29:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309688#post309688</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309688#post309688</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Do the Greens steal votes from Labour? Does NZ First steal votes from National?</q></p><p>We're looking for pattern in those, right? To my eye, I see Labour/National negatively correlated. Labour/Green barely correlated. Labour/NZF hardly correlated. National/Green negatively correlated. National/NZF negatively correlated. And then the really strange one: Green/NZF positively correlated.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 22:55:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309687#post309687</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309687#post309687</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Like how to get my post text both above and below the attachment?</q></p><p>I believe the text always appears beneath the attachment. And that you can Edit your post and attach another couple of images in the same comment.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 22:53:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309686#post309686</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309686#post309686</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Wow. Can you explain those a bit please.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 22:46:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309685#post309685</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309685#post309685</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks, Steve. That was Excel. I admire R from afar. It was an honour to meet Ross Ihaka, though I'm not sure he believed me when I told him that. :)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 22:45:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Green</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309682#post309682</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309682#post309682</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It's a really nice font, thanks.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 22:09:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309681#post309681</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309681#post309681</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>One of the tricky things with the dependence vs independence is the reserve population of not voting, and the movements between the voting and non-voting.</p><p>Peter, I accidentally left my font on the free internet available "lovedbytheking" font so when I started making the diagram in Inkscape it was the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 22:06:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Green</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309680#post309680</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309680#post309680</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Slightly off-topic: how'd you get that cool handwriting effect for the "Colmar Results" text?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 21:41:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JonathanM</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309678#post309678</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309678#post309678</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Do the Greens steal votes from Labour?  Does NZ First steal votes from National?</p><p>If we look back at the polls (rather than use the output from the simulator from poll of polls, as we know they’re independent with the exception of National due to the way it predicts) then…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 21:21:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bmk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309677#post309677</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309677#post309677</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>You  are right that the polls are only predicting if an election were held tomorrow &ndash; not the actual election. They show the current situation rather than what will happen on the actual election.</p><p>That being said the current polls don't give National a 99.5% chance of governing &ndash; the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 21:17:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309675#post309675</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309675#post309675</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Presumably these calculated percentages are based on the idea "if the election was held now". The only uncertainty is whether the polls have accurately captured what the population wants, and we get all our combined probabilities from that?</p><p>I ask because it obviously isn't going to be held now, so…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 20:58:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309673#post309673</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309673#post309673</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						OK, so P(N|~W) is not 0.47 in those figures. It's 0.995. Which makes bmk correct.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 20:31:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bmk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309669#post309669</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309669#post309669</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> and even if he's absolutely certain to go with them, the best chance they have is 75%.</q></p><p>I think you've gone wrong somewhere in that the labour clear win chance was 0.005. If Winston is absolutely certain to go with National then when you combine the National clear win and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 19:06:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JonathanM</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309668#post309668</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309668#post309668</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>@BenWilson: According to the output from Peter Green's poll of polls, P(W) = 1.   Nats + Winston are then around 10 seats clear.</p><p>In the scenario analysis that I've done from the poll of polls, it indicates that the Nats have a 23% chance of going it alone* without Winston…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 18:55:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309667#post309667</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309667#post309667</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Ben, while Winston deciding is an outcome, it is not a government, so if you were trying to work out the government, I think it would look more like this.<br />Which under the Colmar results put national anywhere between just under 47 and just under 100 depending on how Winston…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 18:43:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309666#post309666</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309666#post309666</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>it just makes no judgement as to how likely that is within the 53%</q></p><p>That would be an awesome conditional probability to be able to get. Then we could work out the overall probability of National-led govt. </p><p>Just for fun since I'm swotting this stuff right now:</p><p>P(N) = P(N|W)P(W)…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 17:17:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309665#post309665</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309665#post309665</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The text is on the graph as part of the image- in the latest update on<br /><a href="https://github.com/thoughtfulbloke/OneVoteTwoVoteRedVoteBlueVote/blob/master/oneVoteTwoVoteRedVoteBlueVote.R" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://github.com/thoughtfulbloke/OneVoteTwoVoteRedVoteBlueVote/blob/master/oneVoteTwoVoteRedVoteBlueVote.R</a><br />it is the barplot with the setting main="" adding the text above the graph, the setting sub="" adding text below the graph<br />I actually did some making graphs in R examples for something…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 15:55:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309664#post309664</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309664#post309664</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Incidentally, for anyone think "I should learn R" it is one of the major languages used in free online courses about data, for instance at Coursera (the Massive Open Online Courses site). Generally you would need 8 to 10 hours a week for a lot of the courses (slightly more…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 15:51:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Henry Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309663#post309663</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309663#post309663</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>From the <a href="http://www.horizonpoll.co.nz/page/361/majority-thi?gtid=2629138331141ZHY" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> Horizon poll</a>:<br /><q>If there is a coalition government after the next general election, which main party would you prefer to lead it?</q></p><p>Answers from those who gave their party vote to NZF in 2011 (n=230): Labour 73%, National 27%</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 15:38:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309662#post309662</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309662#post309662</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>It’s hard for me to read the titles of the bars which say “w/o NZF” on my iMac with 21.5” screen. But I appreciate you are suffering from somebody’s “law of graphical displays” which says there are never enough pixels…</p><p>And on the subject of graphs…how did you put your…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 15:38:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309661#post309661</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309661#post309661</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Just testing this for readabilty based on the natural size of the graph and the scale of the letters
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 15:19:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309660#post309660</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309660#post309660</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> I ask because “Winston decides” surely includes an unknown chance of Labour led government?</q></p><p>It is either a Labour or National Government- it is defined by the difference between the two blocks (sans Winston) is not greater than the seats NZF have. It makes no judgement about what Winton would…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 13:57:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309659#post309659</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309659#post309659</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> I ask because “Winston decides” surely includes an unknown chance of Labour led government?</q></p><p>I'd like to think that with NZ Firsts state assets policy alone, that they can find room to compromise with Labour and Greens to change the govt and or a mix with Mana and Internet if…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 13:31:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309657#post309657</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309657#post309657</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>a small chance (about 0.05%) of either labour-led</q></p><p>Labour-led meaning "not requiring (but possibly including) Winston" here? I ask because "Winston decides" surely includes an unknown chance of Labour led government?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 12:55:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309656#post309656</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309656#post309656</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>While I would want him to go with Labour; I really don’t think he will. If it were just Labour then it would be a realistic possibility but he won’t get along with the Greens and he doesn’t want to be the third party in the coalition. </q></p><p>We'll see on…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 12:53:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JonathanM</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309655#post309655</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309655#post309655</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>There was (and is still until the PR is in) a bug in my code, which meant that parties under the threshold without an electorate weren't ignored.  As this most likely means the Conservatives get counted when they shouldn't, the result is quite important.</p><p>With Colmar Brunton the fixed result…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 12:50:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309654#post309654</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309654#post309654</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>In terms of better data presentation and analysis I just couldn't resist re-posting this which just came my way. </p><p><a href="http://www.statschat.org.nz/2014/04/05/oh-what-a-difference-a-bit-of-formatting-makes/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.statschat.org.nz/2014/04/05/oh-what-a-difference-a-bit-of-formatting-makes/</a></p><p>I liked your graph with ranges Sacha. You get my vote (and assistance if you want it). I'm way behind in my R and nice graphs skills, but I've always…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 12:35:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309649#post309649</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309649#post309649</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I was thinking about this overnight.</p><p>FiveThirtyEight's prediction that the Republicans will take the Senate in 2014 really shows how emphasising certain elements of the status quo can put you in a conservative, even defensive, mindset.</p><p>Given that positive change is a definitional goal of progressive politics, persuasion has to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 23:07:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309646#post309646</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309646#post309646</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						If anyone thinks 'PeteGeorgeSays' is a valuable service with guaranteed funding, do let me know. #righto
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 21:09:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309645#post309645</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309645#post309645</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I'll try to translate that:</p><p>Thank you Russell. I want someone to post an expert analysis of every poll, and for other people to refer to it. And for journalists to understand poll analysis. Discussion is good.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 21:04:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bmk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309641#post309641</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309641#post309641</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I just tried running a simulation using the numbers from the latest bias adjusted tracking poll rather than the latest poll. This gave it as 45.9% chance of National and NZF deciding 54.1%.</p><p>I think unless something major happens between now and the election once again Winston will be deciding…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 19:06:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Pete George</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309639#post309639</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309639#post309639</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Good offer Russell. What would be good is a person (or preferable persons) available to post (here or a specialist site?) an expert analysis of every poll. Encourage anyone to promote this information as a reference alongside any poll comments/posts. Get the information out there for anyone who's interested and…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 18:48:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bmk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309638#post309638</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309638#post309638</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thank you for producing and sharing the code David and Jonathan. I'm installing R now on my home laptop (already got it at work and am familiar with R although hardly fluent in it) so that I can play out some scenarios on it.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 18:47:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bmk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309637#post309637</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309637#post309637</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Just to note that I'm very keen to host and promote anything that emerges from these exercises.</q></p><p>Maybe closer to the election there could be a weekly post with updated graphs as David says:<br /><q>Well, we can probably get it making pretty graphs of the result for inclusion in posts…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 18:38:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JonathanM</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309629#post309629</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309629#post309629</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It's probably actually a little tricky to combine the two models due to the lack of independence between the larger parties at least?  You can probably get reasonable estimates by sampling party support from small to large using rnorm with appropriate mean + sd as per Peter's estimates + CIs…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 17:23:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309626#post309626</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309626#post309626</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Download the code and play with the numbers. It’s a lot of fun.</p><p>I would start making other assumptions in that case. Firstly, that National would take a hit of a few percent, made disproportionately from young women and ‘aspirational liberals’, and that the Conservative Party would gain votes, some…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 16:57:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309623#post309623</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309623#post309623</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Good things for National, but you are starting to make what I would call a big assumption that they can gift the Conservatives a seat and not lose any significant support over doing so. I would imagine this is a topic of conversation in National strategic circles though.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 16:24:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309621#post309621</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309621#post309621</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>taking away an Epsom ACT electorate win takes National’s chances of an outright victory down from 40% to around 33%.</q></p><p>What happens if you plug in CCCP with an electorate and whatever their current share is of the party vote?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 15:55:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309617#post309617</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309617#post309617</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						More playing… taking away an Epsom ACT electorate win takes National’s chances of an outright victory down from 40% to around 33%. That’s maths.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 15:31:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309616#post309616</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309616#post309616</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>must have a code</q></p><p>or must have code :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 15:30:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309615#post309615</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309615#post309615</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I decided to run the simulation with the figures produced by Peter Green’s poll aggregator (which <a href="https://gist.github.com/pitakakariki/2791866" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">uses a generalised additive model(GitHub)</a>), and made assumptions about voter enrolment (3,150,000; slighly below average increase) and turnout (77%; slightly below the average of recent turnout). Just for kicks I set the loop to…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 15:18:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309614#post309614</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309614#post309614</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But most New Zealanders expect Labour to do something so utterly compellingly stupid before the election that they will fail to win</q></p><p>This is a way to explain it.</p><p><q>I suspect it’s actually more that most New Zealanders have been conditioned by the polls and reportage thereof to believe that…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 15:09:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309612#post309612</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309612#post309612</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But most New Zealanders <em>expect</em> Labour to do something so utterly compellingly stupid before the election that they will fail to win</q></p><p>I suspect it's actually more that most New Zealanders have been conditioned by the polls and reportage thereof to believe that National's victory on the day is assured.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 14:51:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309611#post309611</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309611#post309611</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Just to note that I’m very keen to host and promote anything that emerges from these exercises</q></p><p>Well, we can probably get it making pretty graphs of the result for inclusion in posts about election things. Beyond that I can't think of much as it is really just reinterpreting the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 14:39:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309607#post309607</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309607#post309607</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>There are a number of ways to explain this discrepancy.</q></p><p>Most New Zealanders <em>want</em> Labour to form a coalition government</p><p>But most New Zealanders <em>expect</em> Labour to do something so utterly compellingly stupid before the election that they will fail to win</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 14:20:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309604#post309604</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309604#post309604</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Just to note that I'm very keen to host and promote anything that emerges from these exercises.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 14:00:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309602#post309602</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309602#post309602</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Snap.</p><p>Quite happy to help if for any reason things are difficult (95% of the time it's as easy as pie, but sometimes it isn't).</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 13:58:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309601#post309601</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309601#post309601</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>how does one run this at home</q></p><p>You do indeed need to install something- the language R, from<br /><a href="http://cran.r-project.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://cran.r-project.org</a><br />Where in theory you could open this as a source file and run it. However if dead keen to give it a go, your life would probably be much easier if…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 13:51:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309600#post309600</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309600#post309600</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>This might be a dumb question, but how does one run this at home? I guess I have to install a language or something?</q></p><p>Go to <a href="http://www.r-project.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.r-project.org/</a>‎ and install R. This is pretty easy, and can be done in about ten to fifteen minutes without specialist knowledge. I'd also go…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 13:46:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>danduran</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309599#post309599</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309599#post309599</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						This might be a dumb question, but how does one run this at home? I guess I have to install a language or something?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 13:26:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309598#post309598</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309598#post309598</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> In today’s Horizon Poll, two thirds of New Zealanders expect National to lead a potential coalition government post-election. A plurality of New Zealanders want Labour to lead a coalition government post-election.</q><br />Fascinating, very understandable (most people I talk to are dubious about Labour/Greens getting over the line), and infuriating all…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 12:42:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309596#post309596</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309596#post309596</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Interestingly, support for a Labour-led government is extremely high among 2011 Green voters, with 89.4% supporting the prospect. This compares to 93.1% of 2011 Labour voters.</p><p>The other figures show that National supporters are very confident of their side winning, Labour and Greens supporters are much less so. Bolstering those…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 12:30:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309594#post309594</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309594#post309594</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Interesting. In today’s Horizon Poll, <a href="http://www.horizonpoll.co.nz/page/361/majority-thi?gtid=2629138331141ZHY" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">two thirds of New Zealanders</a> <em>expect</em>  National to lead a potential coalition government post-election. A plurality of New Zealanders <em>want</em>  Labour to lead a coalition government post-election.</p><p>__"The survey starkly illustrates the difference between perceptions over which party might win and what electors would prefer,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 12:20:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309592#post309592</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309592#post309592</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I was actually adding some code for loading gtools while you were writing that :)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 12:15:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Green</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309588#post309588</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309588#post309588</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Does that need a library(gtools) at the top?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 11:53:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309586#post309586</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309586#post309586</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>When someone says high, I always want to know how high.</q></p><p>I think that's called poll jumping.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 11:38:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309585#post309585</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309585#post309585</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And here it goes<br /><a href="https://github.com/thoughtfulbloke/OneVoteTwoVoteRedVoteBlueVote" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://github.com/thoughtfulbloke/OneVoteTwoVoteRedVoteBlueVote</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 11:38:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309583#post309583</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309583#post309583</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>We could call it FiveThirtyEight.co.nz …</q></p><p>Or should that be OneTwentyOne in the NZ context?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 11:34:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309577#post309577</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309577#post309577</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>ALCP, Libz, etc, they’re never going to get enough votes to matter.</q></p><p>The Libz definitely won't. They disbanded and threw in their lot with ACT (or what's left of it).</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 10:54:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JonathanM</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309576#post309576</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309576#post309576</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						David: Sure, MIT license is fine &ndash; more than happy with folk to use it and improve it. :)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 10:40:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309575#post309575</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309575#post309575</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>We could call it FiveThirtyEight.co.nz ...</q></p><p>I'm an electoral-vote.com user.   It got me through the 2008 election and I like the simplicity of it.</p><p>I'd be really interested to know more about how the parties go about trying to persuade voters to change their minds.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 10:15:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309574#post309574</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309574#post309574</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I don’t think sub 1% parties should be discounted.</q></p><p>They only get lumped into "other" when they don't have an electorate seat <strong>and</strong> they're < 1%. ALCP, Libz, etc, they're never going to get enough votes to matter. UF, Act, Mana, they only break the rule because they have sitting MPs so every votes for them does count.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 09:31:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309572#post309572</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309572#post309572</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Jonathan, Great (and a classic demonstration that posting something bad on the internet is a great way to get something better).</p><p>Since I was going to add it to github, but you have done a lot of work on making it actually work, I was going to mark the project…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 08:44:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen R</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309571#post309571</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309571#post309571</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I'd have thought there'd be at least some interest in a well-thought out election polling blog.</q></p><p>We could call it FiveThirtyEight.co.nz ...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 08:13:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JonathanM</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309570#post309570</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309570#post309570</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Finding some mean/CI and framing some godawful backwards hypothesis test...</q></p><p>I think as long as you emphasise and discuss the mean (or effect size) and the CI rather than the P-value you're doing fine, but agreed in many contexts the Bayes approach tends to be more natural.</p><p>It'd be great…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 07:36:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Pete George</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309568#post309568</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309568#post309568</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I don't think sub 1% parties should be discounted. It makes a difference whether they are wobbling from 0-0.5 or wavering from 0.5 to 1. Small parties can move late in an election and it could make quite a difference whether Mana, ACT or UF look possible for picking up…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 06:50:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309567#post309567</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309567#post309567</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>That’s a really good point. </p><p>I suspect (know) that it would (seriously) annoy quite a few people to not have ‘their party’ in the graph – I get calls/emails from people expressing such for parties that are grouped in ‘other’.  They feel as though we are disadvantaging their party by…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 06:15:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309565#post309565</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309565#post309565</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I found the chart Sacha prepared quite helpful.  </p><p>I'd have thought there'd be at least some interest in a well-thought out election polling blog.  It would involve analysing the data provided by the main news organisations, providing a rolling average, commenting on broad trends, critiquing poor coverage and providing insight…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:09:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309563#post309563</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309563#post309563</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I would love it if more stats reporting was Bayesian. It's the only part of stats that really makes sense to me, because it answers the question you really want answered &ndash; the chances of things happening. Finding some mean/CI and framing some godawful backwards hypothesis test, and then reporting…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 23:27:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309562#post309562</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309562#post309562</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						All true. I should have added “or some other factor” and lack of time could well be it.  I know that doing this sort of polling is rather like corporate advertising for Market Research companies. You do it to get your company name out there, not because it makes you…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 23:21:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JonathanM</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309560#post309560</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309560#post309560</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>David: Nice!  A good start, but I don't think we want to simulate a random number of seats in parliament given the proportion of the vote :).  Rather, we want to simulate a random election, given the uncertainty from the poll results.</p><p>I've taken the liberty of updating it to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 23:09:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ianmac</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309557#post309557</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309557#post309557</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Fancy Audrey publishing the Roy Morgan Poll results. And fancy the Herald allowing her to since it conflicts rather with their own poll.<br /><a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&amp;objectid=11231762" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&amp;objectid=11231762</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 22:47:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309556#post309556</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309556#post309556</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>When somebody writes “party support is at 0.1% +/- 0.2% this is almost always a sign that they are either using an approximation to the true distribution which shouldn’t be used near the extremes (0% and 100%), or not sufficiently statistical literate.</q></p><p>Also,  there is a time factor. The methodological…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 21:47:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309555#post309555</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309555#post309555</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And with the Roy Morgan anything but NZ First being a decider is pretty unlikely (baring a Conservative seat, and even if the Conservative's have one NZ First deciding is still more likely than anything else by a bit).</p><p>Minor correction to the above post- with the Colmar results, in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 21:40:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309553#post309553</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309553#post309553</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Here is a very, very rough election result simulator (written in R) just using random binomial draws based on the support in a poll.<br /><a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/ylbsp9ggm1y9lls/oneVoteTwoVoteRedVoteBlueVote.R" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.dropbox.com/s/ylbsp9ggm1y9lls/oneVoteTwoVoteRedVoteBlueVote.R</a><br />I'll put up a proper copy on github tomorrow, but my computer this evening isn't really set up for that.<br />With the Colmar poll, the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 21:14:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309550#post309550</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309550#post309550</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Definitely not a done deal. Long way to go and bound to be the odd unexpected wobble along the way.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 19:49:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309549#post309549</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309549#post309549</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And meanwhile, Roy Morgan:</p><p><a href="http://www.roymorgan.com/findings/5519-new-zealand-voting-intention-201404030447?utm_source=Social&amp;utm_medium=twitter&amp;utm_campaign=5519" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Labour/ Greens (45%) regain lead over National (43%) for first time since January</a></p><p>Quite a lot of nil or marginal change, but National dipping 2.5% and NZ First rising 2% and the Conservatives 1% might be significant.</p><p>Labour rose but Lab/Green vote fell slightly.</p><p>Internet Party in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 19:15:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309544#post309544</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309544#post309544</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Ah. Thanks. Now I can focus on the interesting part...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 17:06:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309543#post309543</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309543#post309543</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I couldn’t care less for the continual news reportage of polls…. seems only to satisfy the math geeks who seem 100% in agreement that they are (seriously) flawed and cannot a soundbite make</q></p><p>It's not the  polls which are flawed. They are what they are. It is the analysis and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 17:05:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Pete George</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309542#post309542</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309542#post309542</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						steve, JonathanN has used the Colmar results which had 7% for NZ First, not the 4.9% they got with Reid Research.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 16:59:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309541#post309541</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309541#post309541</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Hi James,</p><p>Thanks for that. A link lets everybody else see it too,  not just me with my shelf of reference books. Much obliged. </p><p>@ Peter Calder: yes you are quite right, but it is more subtle (yeah, whatever dude maths geek stuff coming) because at very low or high…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 16:46:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ianmac</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309540#post309540</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309540#post309540</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I couldn’t care less for the continual news reportage of polls…. seems only to satisfy the math geeks who seem 100% in agreement that they are (seriously) flawed and cannot a soundbite make</q><br />That may be so but a huge part of the audience get the message intended.<br />This or…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 16:42:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309537#post309537</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309537#post309537</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						that's a complaint to TV3's in-house standards committee. Next step would be going to BSA with it.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 15:31:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Green</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309536#post309536</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309536#post309536</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Note: I’m having another read through my reference library with regards to the multiply by 1.414</q></p><p>Hi Steve, I've been really enjoying your contribution. This is the <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/images/PollingUnit/MOEFranklin.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">reference</a> I use in relation to 1.41(4) in relation to comparing between polls.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 15:22:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309535#post309535</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309535#post309535</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Looks like someone over at Te Standard <a href="http://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-03042014/#comment-793678" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">wrote to the BSA</a>... and had their complaint thrown out.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 15:12:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309534#post309534</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309534#post309534</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>anything under about 1%</q></p><p>I did wonder at the negative 0.1% values.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 14:49:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309533#post309533</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309533#post309533</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>You can do this pretty easily in R</q></p><p>ta &ndash; hence my comment about not having the right tools. :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 14:48:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JonathanM</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309532#post309532</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309532#post309532</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Sacha: That's better, yup, but you need to calculate exact binomial CI's for anything under about 1% or so (the binomial is too skew below that for the normal approximation to kick in).  This will also mean you can estimate the CI for the 0's as well.</p><p>You can do…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 14:29:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bob daktari</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309529#post309529</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309529#post309529</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I couldn't care less for the continual news reportage of polls.... seems only to satisfy the math geeks who seem 100% in agreement that they are (seriously) flawed and cannot a soundbite make</p><p>Why Mr Gower insists on doing them the way he and his peers do frustrates me as…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 14:10:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Pete George</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309527#post309527</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309527#post309527</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Peter, I may not have expressed that clearly but with a sample size of 1000 the margin is +/- 3.1 at 50% (with 95% accuracy) so that's 46.9-53.1 with a one in twenty chance of being outside that range.</p><p>And it's +/-1.34 at 4.9% which is the example I gave…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 13:37:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309526#post309526</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309526#post309526</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>"Our poll shows National is (highly) likely to have 56 to 58 MPs."</p><p>Not hard.</q></p><p>It's only "not hard" for the point where you're discussing National, Labour, and the Greens. After that it's really, really uncertain. <br />UF will <em>probably</em> get Dunne back into Parliament, but it's not totally certain. Likewise…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 13:35:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Calder</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309525#post309525</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309525#post309525</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>A 4.9% result has other critical information associated with it. There’s a +/- 1.4 margin of error giving a 95% confidence of it being in a range from 3.5-6.3% which is slightly less than a fifty fifty chance of making or breaking the 5% threshold.</q><br />Sorry, Pete. Balderdash. If a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 13:26:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309524#post309524</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309524#post309524</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Yes, and we need journalists to distinguish between polling (randomly selected stratified or quota-selected, representative samples of potential voters) and surveying (self-selected, non-randomised on-line surveys). The new guidelines released by Research Association New Zealand “New Zealand Political Polling Code” are very good. </q></p><p>I’d only give the new code a bare…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 13:17:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Geoff Lealand</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309522#post309522</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309522#post309522</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yes, and we need journalists to distinguish between <strong>polling</strong> (randomly selected stratified or quota-selected, representative samples of potential voters) and <strong>surveying</strong> (self-selected, non-randomised on-line surveys).  The new guidelines released by Research Association New Zealand "New Zealand Political Polling Code" are very good.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 12:44:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309521#post309521</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309521#post309521</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>There is one thing they could, and should, be doing which is incredibly simple: include the undecided/don’t know/wouldn’t say vote. Making it disappear isn’t “dealing with what’s there”. One of the most interesting things about that last poll, surely, was the rise in the undecided vote. These are the people…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 12:10:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309520#post309520</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309520#post309520</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q><br />Here ya go: <a href="https://www.3news.co.nz/Politics/3NewsReidResearchPoll.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.3news.co.nz/Politics/3NewsReidResearchPoll.aspx</a><br /></q></p><p>Unfortunately this kind of graphic may be misleading and bogus for the reasons I mentioned before, although that was more in the context of the C-B methodology. </p><p>Now let’s consider what is happening with retirement of sitting members. The most dramatic effect is likely to be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 11:55:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>NBH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309517#post309517</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309517#post309517</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Whether it helps to create a definitive yes/no meaning or not, I don't understand the point in asking questions that need such a lead-in to make sense</q></p><p>Yeah, if you were going to make this question &ndash; and presumably the Orivida one as well &ndash; properly robust you'd make it…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 11:26:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309514#post309514</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309514#post309514</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Balanced questions Paddy?</q></p><p>Whether it helps to create a definitive yes/no meaning or not, I don't understand the point in asking questions that need such a lead-in to make sense.  If regular voters aren't going to have a controlled introduction towards forming an opinion, isn't a poll which does exactly…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 11:14:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309513#post309513</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309513#post309513</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But I still think the MSM could take a punt and start representing the poll data in a manner more closely linked to reality.</q></p><p>There is one thing they could, and should, be doing which is incredibly simple: include the undecided/don't know/wouldn't say vote. Making it disappear isn't "dealing with…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 11:00:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309511#post309511</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309511#post309511</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>I think, because of the 5% line, if drawing virtual Parliament results, you kind of need two, side by side, with some visual indication of how likely each style of results, because the flow on effects of NZ First’s result are (I think, looking at the numbers) going to have…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 10:54:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309509#post309509</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309509#post309509</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>you aren’t limited to a graph that is fixed</q></p><p>great opportunity for tv to differentiate themselves from print media, you’d think</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 10:22:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309508#post309508</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309508#post309508</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I recall tv news using stacked columns to represent coalition blocs. Perhaps they could add some shading or animation to each chunk in the column to show its range? And dynamically adjust the other chunks when parties dependant on thresholds were added or removed.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 10:21:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309504#post309504</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309504#post309504</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>you kind of need two, side by side</q></p><p>But TV is not a static medium, you aren't limited to a graph that is fixed. You could have some seats fixed red blue green or purple and some that flick between colours slowly or rapidly depending on uncertainty or something much…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 09:54:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309503#post309503</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309503#post309503</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>    Honestly is there any reason why they couldn’t report actual intervals instead of just simplistic percentages.</p><p>I have some sympathy here. Explaining confidence intervals in a three-minute news item is not something I’d like to try and do.</p><p>But yes, as you and Pete both note, treating the simple number…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 09:50:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309499#post309499</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309499#post309499</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thinking about it you need another bar or another colour on each bar to describe the don't know vote.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 09:39:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309496#post309496</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309496#post309496</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I think, because of the 5% line, if drawing virtual Parliament results, you kind of need two, side by side, with some visual indication of how likely each style of results, because the flow on effects of NZ First's result are (I think, looking at the numbers) going to have…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 09:19:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Geddis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309493#post309493</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309493#post309493</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> To me, they have all the believability and all the sincerity of a Rebekah Brooks solemnly promising she won’t do it again.</q></p><p>I for one happen to believe that Rebekah Brooks will never be involved in phone hacking again ... .</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 08:00:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309492#post309492</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309492#post309492</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I read the replies by Patrick Gower in the post above. To me, they have all the believability and all the sincerity of a Rebekah Brooks solemnly promising she won't do it again.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 07:36:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Martin Roberts</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309487#post309487</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309487#post309487</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I didn't read the entire previous discussion, but did any of the historical analyses of polling account for the 5% threshold?</p><p>If Winston polls 4.9% then I would pick NZF to be in, based on how many people I heard last time saying they might throw him a vote to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 06:15:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309486#post309486</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309486#post309486</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So John Key and National are ‘masking’ their donations by using restaurants and other events, where participants are making donations or paying over the top for services.</p><p>Its seems a clear strategy to get around the election donor law</q></p><p>Not even close. The way it was structured increased transparency.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 00:31:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309482#post309482</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309482#post309482</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'd argue that such a graph is a clearer version of the data than any of the numbers given in the news.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 23:35:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309481#post309481</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309481#post309481</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>To be fair the Survey could have said: ” Mr Key concealed the fact that his charity game of golf was actually a fund raiser for the National Party and he concealed a second game in the same way. Do you think John Key’s action were worthy of a man…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 23:25:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309478#post309478</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309478#post309478</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Here's an attempt at showing the Colmar Brunton results as ranges rather than single figures. Thank you Andrew Robertson for the source data.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 23:11:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ianmac</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309477#post309477</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309477#post309477</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Russel reported that Paddy said: "David Cunliffe was found to be using a trust to conceal donations to his campaign for the .............. Do you think David Cunliffe’s actions were worthy of a man who wants to be Prime Minister?</p><p>To be fair the Survey could have said: " Mr…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 23:07:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309476#post309476</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309476#post309476</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>At the risk of cross-threading, a side-note in the polls is how education looks to be at the top of the list this election. <br />Parata's oblivious blithering isn't doing the Nats any favours. <br />But NZ needs articulate passionate voices (like Jollissa :)) to explain how National's innocuous-sounding managerial approach -…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 23:07:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309475#post309475</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309475#post309475</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Fair enough. And they could say "given the margin of error, at 4.9% in our poll, New Zealand First effectively has a 50-50 chance of getting back into Parliament".</q></p><p>I have it at 46% :-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 22:59:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309472#post309472</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309472#post309472</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Yep. That’s a story they’ll want to run.</q></p><p>And yet that is <strong>exactly</strong> the story New Zealand needs to hear to understand that MMP is actually working as intended and not just being steamrolled by National.</p><p>It IS a balanced situation where your vote counts &ndash; NOT what is being…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 22:01:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309469#post309469</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309469#post309469</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>I was also critical of what I called 3 News' "lazy" habit of featuring John Key as commentary talent in their stories, sometimes to the extent of using the Prime Minister to explain the angle of the stories. Gower said they've also had complaints about the frequent use of Russel…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 21:42:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Pete George</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309468#post309468</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309468#post309468</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>This is what you want?<br />National	45.9% +/- 3.1%<br />Labour	31.2% +/- 2.9%<br />Greens	11.2% +/- 2.0%<br />NZ First	4.9% +/- 1.3%<br />Maori	1.5% +/- 0.8%<br />Mana	1.1% +/- 0.6%<br />United Future	0.1% +/- 0.2%<br />Act	1.1% +/- 0.6%<br />Conservative	1.1% +/- 0.8%<br />Internet	0.4% +/- 0.4%</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 21:42:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309467#post309467</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309467#post309467</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>This was an excellent comment!</p><p>I agree a) that non-response is a far, far bigger issue than non-coverage in telephone surveys, and b) survey reports should include the response rate.</p><p>The problem is though, I've seen some very dodgy response rate formulas used in New Zealand by reputable companies. What…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 21:41:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andre</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309466#post309466</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309466#post309466</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It is worth remembering that the reason for our vigilance regarding political polling in advance of this election was the obvious bias in the way almost all of the mainstream media reported the polls prior to the last election. And the research organisations’ own body even confirmed this after the…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 21:29:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309465#post309465</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309465#post309465</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Yep. That’s a story they’ll want to run.</q></p><p>Yes, well illustrated.</p><p>It also brings us back to Monday's point about the folly of drawing up virtual houses of Parliament at this point. But that's a hard sell.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 21:11:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Green</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309464#post309464</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309464#post309464</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I’d just like to paraphrase Steve’s post.<br />For us to be able to confident that there is a real change in support between two polls, it would need to move by more than 4.3%*<br /><strong>The correct narrative is “Our poll was not adequately powered to detect any changes”.</strong><br />To quote…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 21:10:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tim Darlington</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309463#post309463</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309463#post309463</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks for this, it's great stuff.  This is the first time I've seen Gower provide a reasonable explanation for what usually strikes me as risible propaganda when I'm watching it.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 21:03:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alistair McBride</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309462#post309462</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309462#post309462</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						If the journos just used the language the public would get used to it very quickly. All the poll figures do is show a possible trend. The graphs they use need the band width which shows the trend even more clearly instead of the succession of "spikes" they currently portray.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 20:59:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309459#post309459</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309459#post309459</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Yep. That's a story they'll want to run.</q></p><p>The underpants gnomes will not permit it.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 20:52:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309458#post309458</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309458#post309458</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the info in them so very rarely seems to make it into the mainstream narratives</q></p><p>who makes those decisions? <br />and who benefits?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 20:51:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Geddis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309456#post309456</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309456#post309456</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>“Our poll shows National is (highly) likely to have 56 to 58 MPs.”</p><p>Not hard.</q></p><p>But to be <em>fully</em> "accurate" it would have to be something like "our poll shows National is (highly) likely to have 56 to 58 MPs, Labour is (highly) likely to have X to X+2, the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 20:44:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Geddis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309453#post309453</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309453#post309453</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So John Key and National are 'masking' their donations by using restaurants and other events, where participants are making donations or paying over the top for services.</q></p><p>No. They aren't doing any such thing. I explained the whole thing here: <a href="http://www.pundit.co.nz/content/one-of-these-things-actually-isnt-quite-like-the-other" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.pundit.co.nz/content/one-of-these-things-actually-isnt-quite-like-the-other</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 20:37:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alex Coleman</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309447#post309447</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309447#post309447</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Those graphs on the reid site are <em>fascinating</em>, and I really don’t want to start up with the ‘OMG bias’ stuff again, but it’s damn shame the info in them so very rarely seems to make it into the mainstream narratives.</p><p>As an example, the big to do over Cunliffe’s…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 20:26:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309446#post309446</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309446#post309446</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Stats 101:</p><p>Not much is happening in these polls (statistically). But it never seems to slow down the narratives. This cartoon nails it:</p><p><a href="https://xkcd.com/904/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://xkcd.com/904/</a></p><p>Hover over that and it adds "and also all financial analysis..." and they should add "and all political polls when the methodology section gives margins of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 20:16:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hebe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309445#post309445</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309445#post309445</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Good questions Russell. Good on Patrick Gower for fronting up &mdash; a  sight more democratic than much of our political process.</p><p>And of course Russell had to break that embargo &mdash; happy birthday PG.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 20:15:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hebe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309444#post309444</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309444#post309444</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 20:14:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309443#post309443</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309443#post309443</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thank you. Any links for those tables of intervals?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 20:13:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Pete George</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309441#post309441</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309441#post309441</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>That page isn't great for me either. The basics are here: <br /><a href="http://yournz.org/2014/03/30/polls-one-news-colmar-and-3-newsreid-research/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://yournz.org/2014/03/30/polls-one-news-colmar-and-3-newsreid-research/</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 20:12:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309437#post309437</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309437#post309437</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm not seeing any numbers. even the graphics aren't rendering properly in my browser
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 20:06:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JonathanM</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309436#post309436</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309436#post309436</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I actually don’t think you could do it that easily, because seats are distributed proportionally to parties over 5% or with electorate seats. </q></p><p>Correct, but I think you could present "which combinations of parties could form government" reasonably enough.  A Monte Carlo simulation of the seat distribution from the poll…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 20:03:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BlairMacca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309432#post309432</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309432#post309432</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>"Winston comes in at 4.9 and I instantly think, hey, he’s good for 5% on election day.</p><p>“But you’ve got to stick with the information that you’re given. And you’ve got to stick with it from month to month and pretend that there is nothing else out there, for the…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 19:46:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309428#post309428</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309428#post309428</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Here ya go: <a href="https://www.3news.co.nz/Politics/3NewsReidResearchPoll.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.3news.co.nz/Politics/3NewsReidResearchPoll.aspx</a> :)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 19:22:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309427#post309427</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309427#post309427</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> but pretty much the first thing Patrick said was that they were good questions and he was happy to answer them.</q></p><p>That's possibly where the likes of Campbell live could do some legwork to help themselves Patrick and the public have a better understanding."We, the public are not in Kindergarten…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 19:21:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309423#post309423</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309423#post309423</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Who wants to put together a graph as an example?</q></p><p>Worth a crack. Data source for one of these recent polls, anybody?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 18:56:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309422#post309422</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309422#post309422</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Sorry if that sounded like I was telling you to suck eggs! I know that you know exactly how MMP works! </p><p>Mainly wanting to make the point that providing seat ranges would require many more assumptions than just 'all electorate seats are held' &ndash; the potential number of party seat…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 18:52:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309420#post309420</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309420#post309420</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Hey Graeme</p><p>I actually don't think you could do it that easily,  because seats are distributed proportionally to parties over 5% or with electorate seats. For example if NZ First's range put them under OR over the 5% threshold, that would influence how all the other seats are distributed, so…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 18:44:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309418#post309418</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309418#post309418</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>That would have to be one of the longest and most cogent expositions on the subject of politics that Paddy has ever had the privilege of being associated with.</p><p>Bravo!</q></p><p>Yes. My past experience with criticism of TV news journalists and editors is that they are the most precious little…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 18:28:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309417#post309417</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309417#post309417</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>“Our poll shows National is (highly) likely to have 56 to 58 MPs.”</p><p>Not hard.</q></p><p>Fair enough. And they could say "given the margin of error, at 4.9% in our poll, New Zealand First effectively has a 50-50 chance of getting back into Parliament".</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 18:26:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Pete George</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309414#post309414</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309414#post309414</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Who wants to put together a graph as an example? TV is good for visuals, if they see how it can be done it could catch on.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 18:19:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309413#post309413</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309413#post309413</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I have some sympathy here. Explaining confidence intervals in a three-minute news item is not something I'd like to try and do.</q></p><p>"Our poll shows National is (highly) likely to have 56 to 58 MPs."</p><p>Not hard.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 18:19:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309410#post309410</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309410#post309410</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						a televisual moment, for sure
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 18:08:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309408#post309408</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309408#post309408</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>is there any reason why they couldn't report actual intervals instead of just simplistic percentages</q></p><p>Easy enough to show on a graph. Most people don't have trouble with a range if it's shown visually.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 18:00:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael Homer</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309407#post309407</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309407#post309407</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Even reporting the intervals isn't overly helpful in itself since (among other things) the proportions aren't actually independent &ndash; +1% to someone has to come from someone else, which has flow-on effects elsewhere. They have a pretty narrow range of application and the nuances are pretty subtle. It would be…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 18:00:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>cindy baxter</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309406#post309406</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309406#post309406</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> That information could also go on the TV3 website, but I know how hard it is to get data up there in a specialised format </q></p><p>Surely a link to a pdf wouldn't be too difficult?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 17:55:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
