<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Hard News: Don&#039;t call it a consensus</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Joanna</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=44864#post44864</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=44864#post44864</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>This was in Popbitch today:</p><blockquote><p>Wonder why The Klaxons looked so out of it trying<br />to mime alongside Rihanna at the Brits? They'd<br />dropped some acid before the show. Respect.</p></blockquote><p>Hehe!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:07:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=44551#post44551</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=44551#post44551</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>James, I would respond, but it appears your argument is 'global warming is a myth because I believe that peak oil won't happen'.</p><p>Which doesn't seem worth anyone's time to be honest.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:11:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Bremner</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=44538#post44538</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=44538#post44538</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Well why let a fun thread die ... </p><p>Since we are into new descriptions of people with whom we disagree, just for fun, perhaps we can call those most devout believers in AGW "Climate Catastrophists"</p><p>This article ought to cause the catastrophists to clench their sphincter muscle tighter than it…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:13:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bob Munro</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=44384#post44384</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=44384#post44384</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Joseph Romm at <a href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/10/media-enable-denier-spin-3-please-stop-calling-them-skeptics/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Climate Progress</a> has a go himself at a new name for deniers. <br />He opts for 'delayers'.</p><blockquote><p>What name can we possibly use for the people who are working feverishly to convince the public to ignore the broad scientific understanding of global warming and to delay taking serious…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:09:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43671#post43671</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43671#post43671</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Can't resist, considering the ridiculous claims of heroism deniers attribute to themselves:</p><p>Behold!  Before you stands Denius the Mighty, scion of the Clan Zetetic, guardian of the dread portal of the Moving Goalposts, wearer of the Impenetrable Helm of Tinfoil and Wielder of the Magic Talking Sword of Specious Rhetoric!…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 09:44:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43649#post43649</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43649#post43649</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>dc_red wrote:</p><blockquote><p>My dislike for McCully is intense and increasingly visceral. It's not like RB is replacing failed National Party candidate Paul Henry or anything....</p></blockquote><p>And what do you think are the odds that if Paul Henry ended up on The Standard, with a lovely photo of him at a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 23:42:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>cindy baxter</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43554#post43554</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43554#post43554</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Forgot to mention that great great Arthur C Clarke quote, repeated in Chris Mooney's book about the science of hurricanes and global warming (Storm World)... </p><p>"When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 23:15:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>cindy baxter</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43553#post43553</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43553#post43553</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I thought it worth pointing this discussion to the BBC's Richard Black's testing of the the alleged "conspiracy" that the scientific world is biased against the sceptics, and in favour of AGW scientific papers. </p><p>He wrote to all the sceptics he could find,  to find the information which backed up…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 23:08:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Terence Wood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43552#post43552</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43552#post43552</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						or maybe Deniarz!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 19:06:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Terence Wood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43550#post43550</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43550#post43550</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"denialisers" "denialators"</p><p>shesh you lot are <em>sooo dated</em></p><p>try Denierz!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 18:09:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>A S</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43546#post43546</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43546#post43546</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I suspect most people would whole heartedly support moves against global warming if it wasn't for the unpleasant, evangelical zeal with which so many thrust their views down the throats of others. </p><p>I guess what I'm saying is, I suspect most people don't like the messengers on climate change/global warming,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 17:07:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bob Munro</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43543#post43543</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43543#post43543</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Well you have certainly earned your break back in the real world after taking the battle to such heights here. A bit like Prince Harry perhaps?</p><p>Anyway you probably know this already but here's a rundown of why the brick wall is so stubborn.</p><p><br /><a href="http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/about.php" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">What is Denialism</a></p><p><br />Hat tip to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:25:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>daleaway</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43542#post43542</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43542#post43542</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"I've met hundreds of people who think there's large groups of people out there who believe in grand conspiracy theories, and none who actually do."</p><p>And most of them are on Trade Me Message boards, it seems. Trade Me opened an Environment board recently, which was immediately invaded by impressive…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:25:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43541#post43541</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43541#post43541</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>So who's buying "Nexus", "Uncensored", and "Investigate?"</p></blockquote><p>And books by Richard Hoagland and Michael Crichton.  </p><p>And there were plenty of mobs willing to burn witches.  That's what motivates me &ndash; the fear of a society which will embrace such deadly illusions.</p><blockquote><p>Kracklite, you do go above and beyond the call…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:03:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43540#post43540</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43540#post43540</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>I've met hundreds of people who think there's large groups of people out there who believe in grand conspiracy theories, and none who actually do.</em></p><p>So who's buying "Nexus", "Uncensored", and "Investigate?"</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 15:42:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bob Munro</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43539#post43539</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43539#post43539</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Kracklite, you do go above and beyond the call of duty banging your head against this particular brick wall.</p><p>To the denialisers. </p><p>We all accept that humans have modified the land. We can see it around us everywhere. We can probably accept that humans have also altered [[http://www.nceas.ucsb.edu/GlobalMarine|the sea and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 15:26:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>tussock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43538#post43538</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43538#post43538</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The odd thing about the loopier conspiracy theorists is that they [...]</p></blockquote><p>Don't exist. I've met hundreds of people who think there's large groups of people out there who believe in grand conspiracy theories, and none who actually do. What would there be, a hundred in the whole country?</p><p>The…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 15:20:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43537#post43537</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43537#post43537</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						H O Ransom at <a href="http://all-embracing.episto.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">All Embracing but Underwhelming</a> has an absolutely fascinating blog on conspiracy. I believe it's his PhD topic.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 15:14:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43536#post43536</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43536#post43536</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Iran-contra. WaterGate. Prez of Ukraine poisoning by Russia &amp; so too the Russian Billionaires in the UK...</p></blockquote><p>True, to which I add the Gunpowder Plot and any secret cartel-type arrangement, including recent revelations of shady practices with ticket surcharges by BA and Virgin (Virgin fessed up).</p><p>However, one can't assume an…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 14:38:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>daleaway</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43535#post43535</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43535#post43535</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>You and Peter Watts seem to have grasped the modus vivendi, Kracklite. </p><p>As did Anna Nicole and the grubby old billionaire when they found each other &ndash;  willing buyer, willing seller, what's the problem?</p><p>Now don't go dragging morality into it.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 13:33:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Shep  Cheyenne</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43533#post43533</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43533#post43533</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Never give up on conspiracy theories!</p><p>1stly They great fun.</p><p>2ndly A cockup doesn't rule out conspiracy it only serves to prove that the act was found out. </p><p>3rdly They're often true &ndash; WMDs anyone?<br />&amp; just a few others off the top of my head.</p><p>Iran-contra. WaterGate. Prez of Ukraine…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 13:13:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43532#post43532</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43532#post43532</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Not a conspiracy of course, just a straightforward commercial arrangement.</p></blockquote><p>Reminds me of what <a href="http://www.rifters.com/real/author.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Peter Watts</a> has to say about his working history:</p><blockquote><p>He spent ten years getting a bunch of degrees in the ecophysiology of marine mammals (how's that for unbridled optimism), and another ten trying make a living…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 12:44:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>daleaway</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43530#post43530</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43530#post43530</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I threw away my tinfoil hat in the 1980s when working close enough to the belly of the governing  beast to stop believing in Conspiracy theories. Any of them.</p><p>On the evidence of my own eyes, Cockup theory and practice rules, all the way. ( Cindy B was even closer…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 12:04:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43529#post43529</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43529#post43529</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Comment of the week!</p></blockquote><p>I'd like to thank the Academy, my agent, my parents, Stanley Kubrick who is a true genius as a director (even if he is dead), the costume designer, Frank my poodle, the make up artists, the lighting technicians, the best boy (what does he do anyway?),…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 11:48:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43528#post43528</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43528#post43528</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Bah!</p><p>Erratum before some smark-aleck responds:</p><blockquote><p>I'm not going to repeat myself, because as you should know &ndash; but clearly don't &ndash; repetition does not make something false true.</p></blockquote><p>... nor does it make something true more or less true.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 11:42:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43527#post43527</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43527#post43527</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But you have found a glaring error anyway, its an abstract and we all know that that they twist the results.</p></blockquote><p>Oh, THEM again.</p><p>Peer reviewed journals accept papers that present <em>falsifiable</em> hypotheses, not because they are already assumed to be true.</p><blockquote><p>seal level and temperatures in NZ.</p></blockquote><p>Really?  I've…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 11:39:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Terence Wood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43526#post43526</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43526#post43526</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>You're ugly and your mother dresses you funny, therefore Francis Bacon wrote the plays of Shakespeare.</p></blockquote><p>Comment of the week!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 11:30:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Terence Wood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43525#post43525</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43525#post43525</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Kracklite,</p><p>I quite like RNZ and don't mind Sean Plunket, but the rest of your comment above was very well put. :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 11:27:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43524#post43524</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43524#post43524</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Kracklite the reason I said Geophysical Review Letters is first rate, is that the peer reviewers know what they talking about and a few journals have a much higher reputation for the quality of the reserch published.<br />But you have found a glaring error anyway, its an abstract and we…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 11:20:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43523#post43523</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43523#post43523</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>ISNT called ...A selective presentation of an isolated phenomenon from second-hand sources with all inconvenient data removed, scientific illiteracy"</p></blockquote><p>No, it's called something else: out of context and probably contested.  The fact that it is not a fairy tale doesn't make it absolutely true as a description of the ocean's…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 11:18:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43520#post43520</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43520#post43520</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>first rank science journal</p></blockquote><p>Oh, I love this.  If it's apparently agreeable, then it's "first rate" and if it's not agreeable, then it's been fiddled by THEM.</p><blockquote><p>rising at an average rate of 1.6 mm/yr</p></blockquote><p>So, the fact that sea levels <em>are</em> rising means that there is no GW?</p><blockquote><p>over…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 10:47:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43519#post43519</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43519#post43519</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I see the Otago University research ISNT called ...A selective presentation of an isolated phenomenon from second-hand sources with all inconvenient data removed, scientific illiteracy" <br />All though an" Inconvenient Truth" did fit that discription.<br />The adjustment to temperature records is a fact. Worldwide there is a lot of questioning about…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 10:27:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43517#post43517</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43517#post43517</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>adjusting the previous temperature records ... downwards</p></blockquote><p>This is just laughable.  Apart from the fact that the site is highly selective with some obvious lacunae (and Steve is trying to extrapolate the general from the specific... again), the implication is that 'adjustment' is and can only be imposed by some…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 09:46:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Terence Wood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43516#post43516</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43516#post43516</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>oh, and James, are you trying to tell me that policy prescriptions must be based on complete certainty about the future? </p><p>...better close down the Reserve Bank then. All the ministries. And parliament.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 09:10:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Terence Wood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43515#post43515</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43515#post43515</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>James &ndash; sunspot activity doesn't correlate well to the recent temperature record. Nor does any other natural phenomenon. The only way that scientists can get observed temperature trends to map to expected temperature trends based on aggregated known forcings is to include the impact of human emissions of GHGs.</p><p>Steve…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 09:06:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>cindy baxter</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43513#post43513</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43513#post43513</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						again, you're all taking one tiny piece of the puzzle, and trying to use that to argue the big picture &ndash; it just doesn't work like that.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 02:25:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Trevor Nicholls</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43512#post43512</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43512#post43512</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I see James Bremner supports the fallacy that economic consequences only follow from policy *changes*.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 00:26:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bob Munro</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43511#post43511</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43511#post43511</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Ill repeat the conclusions for the scaremongers<br />NO EVIDENCE OF ANY ACCELERATION IN SEA LEVELS ( for the last 100 years)</p></blockquote><p>You don't say it &ndash; but by the use of upper case I conclude that you are implying that Anthropogenic Global Warming is a false premise. Is that your…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 21:42:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43510#post43510</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43510#post43510</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Forgot to mention that the "warming" from the historical climate records in Auckland seems to come from adjusting the previous temperature records ... downwards</p><p>Check out the graphs, where the raw is blue the adjusted is red.<br /><a href="http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/RS_NewZealand.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/RS_NewZealand.htm</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 19:12:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43508#post43508</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43508#post43508</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Climate Science is the longer term analysis of weather data.</p><p>Interesting to find this 2004 paper  in a first rank science journal from an Otago University  School of Surveying <br /><a href="http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2004/2003GL019166.shtml" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2004/2003GL019166.shtml</a></p><p>The original analysis of long-term sea level change in New Zealand is updated with a new and extended analysis.....<br />These…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 18:52:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43500#post43500</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43500#post43500</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But Roger Douglas is back with them. Don't people love him anymore?</p></blockquote><p>Well see. Now there's no funny left in the room. Completely used up!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 13:42:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43497#post43497</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43497#post43497</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I think he pretty much had all the funny with the words "party vote for Act" really.</p></blockquote><p>But Roger Douglas is back with them.  Don't people love him anymore?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 12:28:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43494#post43494</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43494#post43494</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I look forward to your party vote for Act then this year Russell :-).</p><p>I wish I could think of a suitably witty reply ...</p></blockquote><p>I think he pretty much had all the funny with the words "party vote for Act" really.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 10:33:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>cindy baxter</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43493#post43493</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43493#post43493</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>re: sunspots &ndash; the whole issue is discussed pretty thoroughly <a href="http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/category/climate-science/sun-earth-connections/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.<br />There is a very detailed scientific discussion on all the different pieces of sunspot science.  I couldn't possibly take part &ndash; I'm not a scientist. </p><p>But do understand this point:  taking just one or two pieces of science from…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 09:29:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Bremner</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43490#post43490</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43490#post43490</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Another article indicating caution might be a better approach rather than rushing headlong into climate change policy with significant economic consequences.</p><p><a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=d7c7fcce-d248-4e97-ab72-1adbdbb1d0d0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=d7c7fcce-d248-4e97-ab72-1adbdbb1d0d0</a></p><p>The issue about climate modeling is a significant one.  If you can't forecast the climate accurately, you don't have a basis for creating policy.  I would have thought…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 04:56:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43489#post43489</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43489#post43489</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Having said that though, talk to a few Maori public servants about the way in which the foreshore and seabed protests (and the in-effect ban on Maori public servants having a voice on that issue) were handled if you want an example from the other end of the spectrum</p></blockquote><p>I'm…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 01:06:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>A S</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43488#post43488</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43488#post43488</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Did you expect any different froma party which is  threatening public servants to discourage them from applying for the position of State Services Commissioner?</p><p>Unfortunately, having lain down with the kiwiblog right, they seem to be institutionalising thuggery as a political tactic.</p></blockquote><p>National should pull their heads in on this…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 23:39:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43484#post43484</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43484#post43484</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>McCully as Minister of Broadcasting:</p></blockquote><p>Jonathan Coleman is National's Broadcasting guy now. His press releases haven't been up to much, but I thought he asked good questions when I talked to the Parliamentary Internet Caucus  last year.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:39:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43483#post43483</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43483#post43483</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Yeah, one would be enough to do my head in too.</p><p>I look forward to your party vote for Act then this year Russell :-).</p></blockquote><p>I wish I could think of a suitably witty reply ...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:56:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nick Kearney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43476#post43476</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43476#post43476</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It's alright Russell, you didn;t need to explain.</p><p>I kind of feel I do, if only to explain that I've explained it before. It's the only Labour Party event I even attend, let alone participate in.</p></blockquote><p>Yeah, one would be enough to do my head in too.</p><p>I look forward to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:12:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>insider outsider</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43461#post43461</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43461#post43461</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Ok Don, tell us why...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:53:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43460#post43460</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43460#post43460</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I've explained this several times before, including to NBR</p></blockquote><p>Talking of the NBR, it is my absolute favourite mag today. I encourage you all to buy a copy.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:37:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43459#post43459</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43459#post43459</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I really think this is extremely improper behaviour from McCully &mdash; and a direct attack on my livelihood.</p></blockquote><p>Did you expect any different froma party which is <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/4419666a6160.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> threatening public servants to discourage them from applying for the position of State Services Commissioner</a>?</p><p>Unfortunately, having lain down with the kiwiblog…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:33:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43458#post43458</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43458#post43458</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I think one of the problem with talking about concensus is that it is practically impossible to get scientists to _absolutely_ agree about anything. It is in fact their job to question stuff and say "Maybe, but I'd really like to actually see the raw data on this".</p><p>Unfortunately this…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:31:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>dc_red</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43457#post43457</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43457#post43457</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>McCully as Minister of Broadcasting: "Are you now, or have you ever been, a distributor of pamphlets for Judith Tizard?" What an obnoxious little turd.</p><p>He almost lost East Coast Bays in 2002. Is it too much to dream that such an event might come to pass once more?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:29:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>uroskin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43456#post43456</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43456#post43456</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Murray McCully always struck me as a failed Village People karaoke contestant peeved he didn't win as he had grown his moustache especially for the occasion.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:20:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>robbery</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43455#post43455</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43455#post43455</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It looked and sounded huge,</p></blockquote><p>extensive use of baking tracks &ndash; watch the drummer. (here's one I baked earlier)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:17:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>simon g</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43454#post43454</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43454#post43454</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>David Farrar has wasted no time putting that Hero photo up on his blog. </p><p>Stand by for the usual well-rehearsed outrage when he gets called on it. ("What, me ref?").</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:16:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43453#post43453</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43453#post43453</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The photo McCully is referring to is here:</p><p><a href="http://www.herodebate.org.nz/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.herodebate.org.nz/</a></p><p>The best pic is of Buckwheat in her amazing dress. People burst into applause when she arrived.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:10:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43451#post43451</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43451#post43451</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It's alright Russell, you didn;t need to explain.</p></blockquote><p>I kind of feel I do, if only to explain that I've explained it before. It's the only Labour Party event I even attend, let alone participate in.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:59:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43449#post43449</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43449#post43449</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						McCully: the McCarthy denialator.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:52:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>insider outsider</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43448#post43448</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43448#post43448</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It's alright Russell, you didn;t need to explain.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:48:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43447#post43447</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43447#post43447</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>possible communist, homosexual sympathiser".</p></blockquote><p>Definitely not the former, absolutely the latter!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:37:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43446#post43446</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43446#post43446</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I see russell is is in McCully's sights</p></blockquote><p>Sigh ... it's presumably only just come to his attention, but I do the Hero Debate every year &mdash; it's really good fun. Gay audiences laugh like drains when you tell 'em foul jokes. The fouler, the better. Although Stephen Gray out-fouls…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:35:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>wendyf</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43444#post43444</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43444#post43444</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I'd be pretty pleased to have any word replace 'denier'. I'm old enough to think "nylon stockings" when I see the word 'denier'.</p><p>From memory I think the lower the number denier (pronounced to kind of rhyme with 'derriere'), the more sheer the stocking.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:19:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>cindy baxter</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43441#post43441</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43441#post43441</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						so, Scott, when the IPCC agrees with "90% certainty" then it must be pretty robust, right?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:58:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Che Tibby</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43440#post43440</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43440#post43440</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						note to self: edit rb's wiki. include "tool of the state, possible communist, homosexual sympathiser".
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:56:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Scott Common</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43439#post43439</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43439#post43439</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I think one of the problem with talking about concensus is that it is practically impossible to get scientists to _absolutely_ agree about anything.</p></blockquote><p>A truer phrase has never been spoken &ndash; I work in an organisation full of scientists &ndash; getting them to even agree to a meeting time…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:52:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43438#post43438</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43438#post43438</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>"denialadilators"?</p></blockquote><p>Why does that sound so rude?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:51:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>InternationalObserver</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43436#post43436</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43436#post43436</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>So let's go for a lighter note. I downloaded and watched The Brits, the British music awards, this week, and although most of the bits in between were crap, the stage performances were brilliantly produced. No more so than Rianna's collaboration with The Klaxons on that song. It looked and…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:50:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>dc_red</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43435#post43435</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43435#post43435</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						My dislike for McCully is intense and increasingly visceral. It's not like RB is replacing failed National Party candidate Paul Henry or anything....
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:49:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Che Tibby</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43434#post43434</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43434#post43434</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>hmmmm... the people who opent he eyes of the denialators?</p><p>"denialadilators"?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:47:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>insider outsider</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43433#post43433</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43433#post43433</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I see russell is is in McCully's sights</p><p> Helen’s Little Helpers at TVNZ <br />Stung by Prime Ministerial claims that her Government’s minor poll setbacks are purely the result of a hostile right wing media, Helen’s little helpers at TVNZ have clearly decided on a bold initiative to win her affections.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:46:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Shep  Cheyenne</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43432#post43432</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43432#post43432</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Denailators &ndash; Chapter 13 of the State of the Environment anyone?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:40:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43428#post43428</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43428#post43428</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>First!</p></blockquote><p>How Web 1.0 of you, Graeme.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:22:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Trevor Nicholls</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43427#post43427</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43427#post43427</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>...wipes out a century of warming</p></blockquote><p>And here was me thinking that up until the end of 2k7 the denial business was emphatically denying that there was any real evidence for "a century of warming" at all.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:18:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>cindy baxter</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43425#post43425</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43425#post43425</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Denial <em>industry</em> because, after all, it is an industry.  It's big bucks from big business.  Look at all the foreign deniers brought to New Zealand over the years &ndash; most recently Nigel Lawson &ndash; all paid for by NZ Business, or the Business Roundtable or the like. </p><p>we can all…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:54:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Che Tibby</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43424#post43424</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43424#post43424</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>QU:  "help! is this the denialators!!!"</p><p>ANS: "no."</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:51:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Che Tibby</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43423#post43423</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43423#post43423</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>damn evan beat me to it.</p><p>"denialators", nice.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:51:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>samuel walker</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43421#post43421</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43421#post43421</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"call out the denialators<br /> cos' there's something in the air....."</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:49:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jo S</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43420#post43420</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43420#post43420</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I think one of the problem with talking about concensus is that it is practically impossible to get scientists to _absolutely_ agree about anything. It is in fact their job to question stuff and say "Maybe, but I'd really like to actually see the raw data on this". </p><p>Unfortunately this…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:43:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andrew r</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43419#post43419</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43419#post43419</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						meanwhile &ndash; two recentish releases I have been lovin lately are the two  most recent  albums by The Fall &ndash; Reformation TLC, and the album before that Heads Roll . Having off and on tuned in and out of the Fall over the passed 25 odd years  , it seems…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:41:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Evan Yates</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43417#post43417</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43417#post43417</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>denialisers.... nice.</p><p>Though I think <em>Denialators</em> has a better ring to it. (Ya know?... Denialator / Terminator )</p><p>To paraphrase Mr. J. Cameron __"They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And they absolutely will not stop, ever, until you…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:31:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43415#post43415</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43415#post43415</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>*denialisers*!? Uggggh...nconvinced of the need for that term.<br />If you really want to avoid <em>deniers</em>, then <em>denialists</em> would be better. Or you could try any of a number of existing synonyms: naysayers? doubters? ostriches...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:27:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43412#post43412</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43412#post43412</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks for that link, James. It has prompted an extremely useful demonstration of how the denialisers* aproach science.</p><p>__* I'm experimenting with the new word denialisers, to see if it mollifies people who absolutely <strong>insist</strong> that "deniers" is an explicit reference to Holocaust denial. (Poneke did that recently, but the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:11:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43410#post43410</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43410#post43410</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Here's <a href="http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/2007/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the 2007 record from the GISS group</a>, one of those cited in that blog post, James. It begins:</p><blockquote><p>The year 2007 tied for second warmest in the period of instrumental data, behind the record warmth of 2005, in the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) analysis. 2007 tied 1998,…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:04:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Terence Wood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43408#post43408</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43408#post43408</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>George,</p><p>Thank you. You just saved me 5 minutes. Perhaps we should coordinate? I'll mark Poneke and you make sure the ball doesn't get to James :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:02:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Terence Wood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43407#post43407</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43407#post43407</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Russell,</p><p>I am, right this moment, laughing with you. First sentence:</p><blockquote><p>Over the past year, *anecdotal* evidence for a cooling planet has exploded.</p></blockquote><p>And this from the same people who won't accept mounds of *scientific* evidence that AGW is real.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:00:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43406#post43406</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43406#post43406</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And this is what the report actually says &ndash; <a href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/2008/jan/jan08.html#global  " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">NCDC Jan 08 report</a>. January was significantly colder than the last few years, but it is still well above the long term average. </p><p>The graphs show what you'd expect from a La Nin~a. A lot of the earth much (3-5…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:00:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Robyn Gallagher</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43405#post43405</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43405#post43405</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I was thinking that Elliot was a kind of unusual name for a girl (I say this as someone who has been called Mr Robin Gallagher), but then <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliot_Reid" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">it clicked</a>.</p><p>Speaking of women with men's names &ndash; Barack Obama's mom's first name is Stanley.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:59:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43404#post43404</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43404#post43404</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It seems Mr Romm hasn't caught up with this, rather solid looking data. Doesn't fit in too well with his rather definitive statements that the world is warming up.</p></blockquote><p>How helpful that that blog post should trumpet its scientific illiteracy right there in its subhead:</p><blockquote><p>**Twelve-month long drop in world…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:52:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43402#post43402</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43402#post43402</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Are you meaning IT people? Or anyone who works at Parliament?</p></blockquote><p>Everyone's nice to the IT guy.</p><p>Hardly anyone is nice to people at parliament.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:49:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>A S</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43401#post43401</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43401#post43401</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Are you meaning IT people? Or anyone who works at Parliament?</p></blockquote><p>Is this a trick question? :-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:48:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andrew llewellyn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43398#post43398</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43398#post43398</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>They usually don't get to speak to real people very often....(or at least about anything vaguely intelligible)</p></blockquote><p>Are you meaning IT people? Or anyone who works at Parliament?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:38:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Bremner</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43397#post43397</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43397#post43397</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>It seems Mr Romm hasn't caught up with <a href="http://www.dailytech.com/Temperature+Monitors+Report+Widescale+Global+Cooling/article10866.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this</a>, rather solid looking data.  Doesn't fit in too well with his rather definitive statements that the world is warming up.</p><p>Maybe instead of whining about all those nasty "deniers" he should be out picking up a few winter woolies?</p><p>Honestly, who…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:36:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>insider outsider</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43396#post43396</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43396#post43396</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"identity of the phantom Wikipedia editor. It's not. He's the IT guy, okay?"</p><p>Yes but he probably appreicates the interest. They usually  don't get to speak to real people very often....(or at least about anything vaguely intelligible)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:30:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andrew llewellyn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43394#post43394</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43394#post43394</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It's not. He's the IT guy, okay?</p></blockquote><p>I knew it all along! :)</p><p>OK, Ok, i'm stopping.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:26:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Darlington</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43392#post43392</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43392#post43392</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>identity of the phantom Wikipedia editor. It's not. He's the IT guy, okay?</p></blockquote><p>As an IT guy, I can only agree. </p><p>On a vaguely related Telco note, Cunliffe has turned down Telecom's operational separation plan. That's good news for the rest of us as there was still far too much…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:17:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43390#post43390</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43390#post43390</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Just a quick comment to get this onto PA System, given that the RSS feed funning into the System home page is broken today.</p></blockquote><p>If believe the obligatory opening comment is supposed to be something like:</p><blockquote><p>First!</p></blockquote><p>And people think you know something about teh Internet :-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:14:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43386#post43386</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43386#post43386</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>although most of the bits in between were crap, the stage performances were brilliantly produced</p></blockquote><p>Agreed. The set design for some of those performances was just awesome. I was also pretty thrilled by the Arctic Monkeys' incredibly drunk antics at the podium. Instead of doing all that bullshit agent-thanking, one…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:08:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43385#post43385</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43385#post43385</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Why did matt and Catherine add an indefinite article to their daughter's surname? Stutter? Uncertainty?</p></blockquote><p>No that was me leaving the last two letters <em>off</em> Matt's surname. Told you I was tired.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:07:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>insider outsider</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43383#post43383</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43383#post43383</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Why did matt and Catherine add an indefinite article to their daughter's surname? Stutter? Uncertainty?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:05:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43374#post43374</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43374#post43374</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Just a quick comment to get this onto PA System, given that the RSS feed funning into the System home page is broken today. (And I'm not going to drag Matt away from his new baby to fix it either.)</p><p>Please note the part addressed to people who think they've…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:42:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43373#post43373</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-dont-call-it-a-consensus/?p=43373#post43373</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:42:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
