<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Hard News: Decidedly Undecided</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Henry Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=318414#post318414</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=318414#post318414</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The number of `undecideds' dropped significantly, from 15% to 10%, <a href="http://www.colmarbrunton.co.nz/images/140727_ONE_News_Colmar_Brunton_Poll_report_19-23_July_2014_prelim.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">in the latest Colmar Brunton poll (pg.5).</a> And it doesn't seem to be going Labour's way.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2014 20:50:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Chris Waugh</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316951#post316951</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316951#post316951</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Gaston Flosse, who’s been knee-deep in corruption for much of his career.</q></p><p>And was <a href="http://www.liberation.fr/societe/2014/06/24/le-proces-haddad-flosse-annule-en-polynesie_1049799" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">in the news yet again for that just 10-ish days ago</a>. [sigh] French Polynesian politics.... Meanwhile, back in the Métropole, I've been having a lot of fun watching [[http://www.liberation.fr/politiques/2014/07/05/droite-forte-les-sarkozystes-plaident-la-cause-de-leur-champion-persecute_1058131|the spot of bother Sarkozy has found himself…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 16:52:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316946#post316946</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316946#post316946</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>By George...</strong><br /><q>I remember that TV footage of him wading in the ocean... </q><br /><em>De Mille on the Flosse?</em></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 14:47:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316945#post316945</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316945#post316945</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I did go back and look for the halo also</q><br />I was thinking more the <em>Book of Jobs...</em></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 14:45:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316944#post316944</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316944#post316944</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						There was mention of pro-Chirac loyalist Gaston Flosse, who's been knee-deep in corruption for much of his career. I remember that TV footage of him wading in the ocean, insisting in nude-emperor fashion that the fallout from the testing was perfectly safe.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 14:33:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316942#post316942</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316942#post316942</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I did go back and look for the halo also :)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 13:42:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Chris Waugh</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316941#post316941</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316941#post316941</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Moved, not removed.</q></p><p>Oops, thanks. That was carelessness on my part &ndash; context made that perfectly clear.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 13:25:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316940#post316940</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316940#post316940</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>feel free to improve or correct anything I fluff</q><br />Moved, not removed. But bloody hell, still wrong.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 13:20:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Chris Waugh</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316939#post316939</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316939#post316939</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>My first reaction, before I'd read beyond "Murray S. McCully": 'holy shit! Murray McCully was Jesus!' Cue John Key: "He's not the Messiah! He's a very naughty Minister of Foreign Affairs!"</p><p>Another tangent: Sentence 2 of the subtitle of <a href="http://www.lefigaro.fr/international/2014/07/03/01003-20140703ARTFIG00218-premier-essai-nucleaire-francais-un-48eme-anniversaire-mouvemente-en-polynesie.php" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this piece at Le Figaro smacked my gob</a>:</p><p><q>Mercredi, une association…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 13:15:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316938#post316938</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316938#post316938</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>especially if you dispense with all that being ‘responsive and responsible’ and ‘perceptions’ nonsense…</q><br />Ah, but…   You don’t need the “responsive and Responsible” stuff, you just have to manage the Perception of responsibility and responsiveness being the responsibility of somebody other than yourself to respond to. Simple eh?.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 13:14:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316936#post316936</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316936#post316936</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>... as the most recent active political thread, I'll post this piece of nostalgia &ndash; make of it what you will...<br /><q> <strong>Public Liaison Officer<br />Murray S. McCully</strong></p><p>As I see it the Public Liaison portfolio lends itself to consideration in two ways. **Firstly you are voting for a Public Liaison…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 12:53:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316934#post316934</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316934#post316934</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And before some smartarse says “Don’t be a Dick”  <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&amp;objectid=11288301 " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">perhaps Dick weren’t a bad guy…</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 12:06:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316932#post316932</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316932#post316932</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I ’d think that most men here – snip – will already have experienced a similar personal epiphany.</q><br />The road to Damascus ain’t what is used to be, we live in a dangerously disparate world now with the haves and have mores treading not so lightly on those that strive…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 11:56:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316931#post316931</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316931#post316931</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Whatever hope I might hold for Cunliffe isn’t about his publicly reiterating my feelings, it’s about his making a real change.</q></p><p>Oh check out the footage Joe, Cunliffe seemed to have an epiphany of his own right then and expressed it openly and shockingly honestly. If he chose at that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 11:54:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316929#post316929</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316929#post316929</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I think it sad that even men here find David Cunliffe’s message to battered women posing or preening or fucked up or alienating. He spoke to a women’s group and apologised that they were hurt.</q><br />I 'd think that most men here &ndash; or any that can empathise with whatever…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 11:36:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316928#post316928</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316928#post316928</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>– why only today she is calling for victims of Rolf Harris to come forward, and she will see that they are helped through the complaint process –</q><br />And sadly that will win votes... because Rolf Harris was famous.<br />Cunliffe, on the other hand, will be seen as weak and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 11:30:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316927#post316927</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316927#post316927</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yep, in the House she said there were issues around that service. Issues like fucking funding for 1.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 11:29:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316926#post316926</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316926#post316926</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And I'm sorry <em>"right now"</em> for <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&amp;objectid=11288535" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> this poor woman in LA</a> in the Herald this morning. <br />Some may find this too graphic although harold doesn't think so.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 11:27:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316925#post316925</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316925#post316925</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Of course Pullya Benefit and her cell phone had no idea.<br />Geez, yes, it’s an Election year, but empathy out the window? Why?</q><br />Bennett can hardly be accused of lack of empathy &ndash; why only today she is calling for victims of Rolf Harris to come forward, and she will…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 11:11:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316924#post316924</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316924#post316924</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> because it’s what they do.</q></p><p>Not good enough then is it? How about a better look at what the Conference was about? What the Politicians were there for? How about how the Organization can get help to stop the cycle of abuse? Oh, that's right ,you said it<br /><q> lots of…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 11:07:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316923#post316923</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316923#post316923</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Men who use blunt instruments and or buckets of money to solve problems.</q>So yes, some men, some of who have empathy even.<br /><q> Because remembering that men and women are the same species, and very similar to one and other, is important when we are trying to achieve equality and resolve…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 10:54:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316922#post316922</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316922#post316922</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> but if a politician does it, even for a moment, it always comes across as preening.</q></p><p>So when a Green Politician does it? Jan Logie would probably disagree.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 10:35:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316919#post316919</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316919#post316919</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But he totally fucked it up, by alienating the very people that need to come to the table. Men who use blunt instruments and or buckets of money to solve problems. </q><br />Nailed it. <br />Posing as if you're carrying the sins of the world on your shoulders might work for the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 00:02:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mr Mark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316885#post316885</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316885#post316885</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Cheers, Andrew.</p><p>When I have time*, hopefully within the next couple of weeks, I'll post a brief overview (on my blog) of the debate so far, including some of the discussion here. And I'll include my response to some of the points made by you, Thomas, Steve and others. I'll…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 15:03:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mr Mark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316883#post316883</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316883#post316883</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Finally, I'll just briefly take your alternative model # 1:<br /><em>"...that 8% of those polled answered "I favour a change of Government" AND say they will give National their party vote. That's because they want a change of the rag tag band of small parties supporting National."</em></p><p><br />National's share of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 14:22:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316880#post316880</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316880#post316880</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Hey Mr Mark/Swordfish</p><p>I mentioned this on DimPost but I don't know if you saw it. If you ever want to catch up to talk polls and undecideds, or if you have any poll-related questions I can help answer, just flick me an email at <span id="x-protectfilter-1"></span><script type="text/javascript">/*<![CDATA[*/if (document.getElementById('x-protectfilter-1') != null) { document.getElementById('x-protectfilter-1').innerHTML=function(e){var r='';for(var i=122;i>=0;i-=2){r+=e.charAt(i);}return r;}('\u003eYao/T\u003cFmyotco.plxi4armjgw@AecivlHl\u003eoapfmVu8rSgY\u003ej\"5mPo0cm.Dl6iRaAmXg0@rewiultl\u003coTprmauKr8gd:BomtylgiIaWm9\"2=Tfce@rWhs Yav\u003cV'); document.getElementById('x-protectfilter-1').removeAttribute('id'); }/*]]>*/</script></p><p>I've got some undecided-related…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 13:54:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316878#post316878</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316878#post316878</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Very revealing contrast in the way TV One (and Katie Bradford) framed Cunliffe’s speech and TV3 (and Amanda Gillies) on their 6 pm TV news items.</q></p><p>Bradford’s report was okay until she decided the most important news was Cunliffe’s alleged “slip-up” and quoted unnamed “sources” in the Labour Party to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 13:44:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mr Mark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316877#post316877</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316877#post316877</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I'll just add the following:</p><p>&ndash; Although it hasn't been widely publicised, <em>Fairfax-Ipsos</em> provide firm evidence that the Undecideds are disproportionately people who voted Labour in 2011. Thus reinforcing the likelihood that the Undecideds do, indeed, favour a change of Government.</p><p>&ndash; When I look back at the NZES data,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 13:39:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mr Mark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316876#post316876</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316876#post316876</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>"I simply maintain that you can't exclude my models on the grounds that they don't fit the data..."</em></p><p>Hence, my suggestion that pollsters ask the more specific <em>Do you favour a Labour-led or National-led Government ?</em> question.</p><p>I think it's good that pollsters take a very cautious, social science-based approach…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 13:19:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Henry Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316873#post316873</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316873#post316873</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Very revealing contrast in the way <a href="http://tvnz.co.nz/politics-news/women-s-refuge-hails-cunliffe-apology-gutsy-6018734" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">TV One (and Katie Bradford)</a> framed Cunliffe's speech and <a href="http://www.3news.co.nz/Cunliffe-apologises-for-being-a-man/tabid/1607/articleID/351436/Default.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">TV3 (and Amanda Gillies)</a> on their 6 pm TV news items.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 12:47:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316872#post316872</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316872#post316872</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Internet Party candidate Miriam Pierard</q><br />Good speech and blog post.<br /> When NACT politicians speak now my mind wanders to this song</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxZ-scE9mDk" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxZ-scE9mDk</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 12:43:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316870#post316870</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316870#post316870</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Here he is speaking about something incredibly important, and bloggers and the media choose to focus on a single sentence, and to report it out of context. I guess I hoped we were more mature than that.</q></p><p>When I wasn't actively angry, I was pretty much in despair about this…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 11:58:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316868#post316868</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316868#post316868</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>statements such as the latter are […] going to become sound bites.</q><br />This begs several questions:<br />Were there any statements of Cunliffe’s <em>actual message</em> that <em>could</em> have been used as soundbites? And if not, why not?<br />But if so, why did media choose to focus away from the message instead?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 11:03:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316863#post316863</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316863#post316863</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Well politicians are always concerned about public perception.</p><p>Tell ya what though &ndash; I'm so sick to death of these continual and obvious beat-ups on David Cunliffe.  Here he is speaking about something incredibly important, and bloggers and the media <em>choose</em> to focus on a <em>single sentence</em>, and to report…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 08:44:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316859#post316859</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316859#post316859</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Okay, thanks.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 06:32:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316858#post316858</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316858#post316858</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the doors of perception….</q><br />As well you know Ian, that is where Jim Morrison found the name of his band.<br />Unfortunately, we lost Morrisom back when he had reached the subtle age of 27, which is 3x9 , for those of you that lack numeric skills that is called rithmatic,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 02:22:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>tussock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316857#post316857</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316857#post316857</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Tussock – it’s not that simple.</q><br />What they report now is bullshit. You don't like my simple approach because it doesn't cover some contingencies, but what they report now covers almost no contingencies. Maybe 1 if a party's near 5%.</p><p><q>The results for each party are non-independent, so if the…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 02:11:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316856#post316856</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316856#post316856</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>PAS gets the balance pretty right for texty-text. The lighter grey for other text elements is just on the right side of readability for me.</q><br />Personally I would prefer comic sans in green on a red background  for the body and a healthy 24 point  italic as headers' with animated…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 02:01:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316851#post316851</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316851#post316851</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>much may depend on how Labour, David Cunliffe as leader, and the rest of the opposition may shape up and communicate over the coming weeks.</q></p><p>Yep</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 23:37:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316850#post316850</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316850#post316850</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>‘brand Key’ = 'trouble clef'</strong><br />Here's hoping a 2014 'lock out!'<br />means no more 'Master Key'!</p><p>Throw wide the doors of perception....</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 23:27:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316847#post316847</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316847#post316847</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						All of those 'alternative models' would possibly fit a LibDem-style movement that would attract 'radical centre' voters too Left for National & ACT, too Right for Labour & Greens, and too liberal/radical for Peter Dunne (a Christian Democrat in comparison) and Winston Peters (more Old Right). Didn't the Social Creditors kind of…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 23:01:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Marc C</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316839#post316839</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316839#post316839</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>“But Andrew and Gavin also agreed that the fact that media organisations either bury the undecided vote or don’t report it at all is a problem.”</p><p>The polls are serving as an instrument that is like a “self fulfilling prophecy”, so to say. We get them all the times, and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 20:49:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316836#post316836</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316836#post316836</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>I’ve simply argued that, throughout the last 18 months of Fairfax-Ipsos Polls, we have a striking contrast between the climate of opinion suggested by (1) the Party Support results (based solely, as they are, on the Decided and those likely to vote) and (2) the ‘Do you favour a Change…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 20:00:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mr Mark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316821#post316821</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316821#post316821</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I do, of course, acknowledge Andrew's argument about the whole rationale for conducting political opinion polls (the brief being  to  determine as precisely as possible the outcome of an election held at the time of the poll &ndash; and therefore the need to exclude likely non-voters and the Undecided), but…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 17:00:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mr Mark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316817#post316817</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316817#post316817</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Part 4 &ndash; The Finale</strong></p><p>.......But I just don't think there are multiple interpretations or overly-complex nuances here (particularly in the context of the liberties &ndash; bordering at times on gross misinterpretation &ndash; taken with Party Support data by journos in their Front Page and Op-Ed poll analyses).</p><p>Need to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 16:32:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mr Mark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316815#post316815</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316815#post316815</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Part 3</strong></p><p>I really can't see <em>multiple interpretations</em> of this. Except to suggest that possibly &ndash; just <em>possibly</em> &ndash; a small minority of those favouring change wanted a National-led Government, but one involving NZ First in some capacity (whether in a formal Coalition or other arrangement). But you'd have to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 16:22:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316810#post316810</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316810#post316810</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>People are much less obsessed with politics than those who comment on politically-orientated blogs.</q></p><p>Yes, it's a sad state of affairs when a perfect storm of factors &ndash; including narrowing attention spans and tabloidised political commentary &ndash; conspire to produce <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_information_voter" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">low-info voting</a>. Civics education has been touted as a partial…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 16:13:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mr Mark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316807#post316807</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316807#post316807</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Part 2</strong></p><p>(My Lap-top suddenly can't handle posting longer comments so, unfortunately, I'll have to break it up into different parts. This is Part Two: The Sequel)</p><p>If you take <em>October 2013</em> ( <em>Fairfax-Ipsos</em> ) as an illustrative example, those favouring a <em>Change of Government</em> outnumbered respondents happy with the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 15:57:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mr Mark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316803#post316803</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316803#post316803</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Part 1</strong></p><p><br /><em>"There are too many different causal models which fit the correlations observed from outside the system. We can't rule out some models based on the evidence we have, so we will be left with multiple interpretations"</em></p><p>I think that's more a criticism of Puddleglum's analysis on __The Political…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 15:39:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jim Cathcart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316782#post316782</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316782#post316782</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Some people might be interested in this blog post on communicating statistical uncertainty, which came to me through Linkedin this morning. <br /><a href="https://gss.civilservice.gov.uk/blog/2014/06/uncertainty/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://gss.civilservice.gov.uk/blog/2014/06/uncertainty/</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 12:45:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Aston</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316757#post316757</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316757#post316757</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Oh please say it is not so… People who don’t care and just get on with life? :-)</q></p><p>Yes my friend we swim in a sea of political apathy. I am shocked when I meet people who are not sure who the blue party is or just don't vote. </p><p>I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 11:41:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316733#post316733</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316733#post316733</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>People are much less obsessed with politics than those who comment on politically-orientated blogs. </q></p><p>Oh please say it is not so... People who don't care and just get on with life? :-)</p><p>Glad you handled that question. I saw it and left the room quickly. :-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 09:51:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316732#post316732</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316732#post316732</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Well, as the bloke who kicked the whole thing off with this (admittedly very brief) analysis of the Left-leaning (or,at the very least, anti-National Government) proclivities of the Undecideds and those unlikely to vote…</q></p><p>Alas, we really need the raw data to make stronger inferences. And in fact we really…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 09:49:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316730#post316730</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316730#post316730</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>How would you ever know if the people ‘polled’ are telling the truth…</q></p><p>You don’t, and some people may lie. It would have to be a lot of people though to really make much of a difference in a <em>random</em> sample of 1,000. People are <em>much</em> less obsessed with politics…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 09:25:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316728#post316728</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316728#post316728</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>How would you ever know if the people 'polled' are telling the truth...<br />it does seem to be a rare commodity in the wild!</p><p>There are many reasons an individual might give a response contrary to their true intentions, or even just to appear as if they had intentions...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 07:57:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316726#post316726</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316726#post316726</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Tussock  – it’s not that simple.</p><p>The results for each party are non-independent, so if the number of seats for one party changes, this changes the number of seats other parties will get (irrepective of what their range is). Parties with a range crossing the 5% threshold would then add…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 05:40:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mr Mark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316725#post316725</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316725#post316725</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I see my first link didn't work.</p><p>Let's try it again...<a href="http://sub-z-p.blogspot.co.nz/2014/06/fairfax-ipsos-poll-february-2014.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://sub-z-p.blogspot.co.nz/2014/06/fairfax-ipsos-poll-february-2014.html</a> (If it doesn't work this time, can I just say Bugger ! &ndash; thank you).</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 02:13:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mr Mark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316724#post316724</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316724#post316724</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Well, as the bloke who kicked the whole thing off with this (admittedly very brief) analysis of the Left-leaning (or,at the very least, anti-National Government)  proclivities of the Undecideds and those unlikely to vote... <a href="http://sub-z-p.blogspot.co.nz/2014/06/fairfax-ipsos-poll-february-2014.html," target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://sub-z-p.blogspot.co.nz/2014/06/fairfax-ipsos-poll-february-2014.html,</a> I'll be replying to Andrew ( and Thomas and <em>KiwiPollGuy</em> ) in an up-coming post…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 02:02:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>tussock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316720#post316720</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316720#post316720</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Actually, we've had people tell us that we shouldn't even report to whole numbers &ndash; but provide only ranges. If we did that though, we couldn't convert to seats and it would be hard to tell how close things are under MMP.</q><br />Of course you can convert it to a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 22:19:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316709#post316709</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316709#post316709</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Just to add to that &ndash; 'brand Key' is an interesting one.</p><p>I think it works for National at <em>this</em> election because the PM has committed to running and seems fairly healthy. If I was advising a client about their brand though, I'd say don't let it be tied to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 18:14:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316708#post316708</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316708#post316708</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Which might raise some interesting questions about whether campaigning works and actually shifts voter behaviour (versus say, awareness).</q></p><p>Yeah &ndash; interesting question. Polling is actually only about 2-3% of the work I do (well, maybe a bit more in an Election Year). Quite a bit of what I do involves…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 18:11:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316707#post316707</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316707#post316707</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks again Andrew. </p><p>When I reread the caution in your methodology about using it to predict the outcome of  the election, I also thought about a certain irony:</p><p>Polling this far out can’t be used to predict the outcome of elections accurately if campaigning works. Especially if it gets disenfranchised…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 17:21:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316700#post316700</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316700#post316700</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Hey Steve</p><p>Yip, you've got the correct numbers, but they happen to be two of the lowest bases we've seen since I can recall.</p><p>Yes 813 is those people who expressed a party voting preference (sometimes with a second prompt) and were likely to vote. And yes there were other…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 15:24:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>TracyMac</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316696#post316696</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316696#post316696</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Love that take &ndash; so to speak &ndash; on how "the economy" is often such a bullshit term.</p><p>(On another note, can bloggers please consider how medium-grey text looks on off-white backgrounds, particularly with a fine sans-serif typeface? Very difficult to read, esp on small screens. Dark grey is more…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 13:15:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316695#post316695</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316695#post316695</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Actually we’ve only seen it dip below 800 a couple of times. Those unlikely to vote are still asked the party vote question, but excluded when calculating the party support results.</q></p><p>I used the numbers on p8 and yes below 800 twice in that series. Excuse me just giving a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 12:57:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316690#post316690</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316690#post316690</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>As an aside, my perspective on polling is aligned with the 'Total Survey Error Approach.'</p><p>Below is a link to a great textbook on this approach. It is very readable for the non-statistics-minded person.</p><p><a href="http://au.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0470465468.html " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> Survey Methodology. Groves et al.</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 08:07:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316689#post316689</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316689#post316689</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thank you. We had a discussion in an earlier thread about how to simply show error ranges in polls &ndash; here's <a href="http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-gower-speaks/?p=309478#post309478" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">my go</a> at it.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 07:48:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316688#post316688</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316688#post316688</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Actually we've only seen it dip below 800 a couple of times.  Those unlikely to vote are still asked the party vote question, but excluded when calculating the party support results.</p><p>Yes, I expect these methodological differences may contribute to some of the differences we see between polls. And sampling…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 06:41:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gavin White</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316687#post316687</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316687#post316687</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Like Andrew I'm generally strongly against the reporting of polls to 1dp &ndash; it implies a level of precision that we just can't deliver.</p><p>There is a case, however, for reporting parties below 5% to 1dp in some circumstances.  If we round to 0dp, then parties that poll 4.5% will…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 23:26:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hebe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316686#post316686</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316686#post316686</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I am not a polling nerd! I'm saving the rest to read until my brain has rebooted.</p><p>Great show Russell and everyone else; this looks like it will settle into a fine groove: informative without po-facing.</p><p>Andrew and Gavin: thanks for your insights into the trade. It's a minefield of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 22:34:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316685#post316685</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316685#post316685</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>so how many folk are you ditching from your denominator?</q></p><p>It looks like the denominator is down to between 700 and 800 per sample based on party supporters. That would widen the margin of error a little bit compared to 1,000. For example</p><p>1,000 and 50% support (95% confidence level)…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 22:19:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316683#post316683</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316683#post316683</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I don’t think so. The problem there was interpreting that NZ First was ‘out’ because they were on 4.8 or 4.9%.</p><p>In our May poll we had NZ First on 4.8%, so we reported two alternative seat conversations – one where they cross the threshold and one where they don’t.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 21:48:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316682#post316682</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316682#post316682</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I'm pretty much against reporting party support percentages to 1dp, because that suggests a level of precision that no poll can provide</q></p><p>same</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 21:42:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316681#post316681</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316681#post316681</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The only reason we report <5% parties to 1dp is to show how close they might be to the 5% threshold.</q></p><p>Though doesn't that play into the example you guys discussed on MediaTake?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 21:41:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316680#post316680</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316680#post316680</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Sorry I don't get what you mean there. </p><p>I'm pretty much against reporting party support percentages to 1dp, because that suggests a level of precision that no poll can provide. Actually, we've had people tell us that we shouldn't even report to whole numbers &ndash; but provide only ranges. If…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 21:40:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316679#post316679</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316679#post316679</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>as you say,</p><p><q>Note: The data does not take into account the effects of non-voting and therefore cannot be used to predict the outcome of an election. Undecided voters, non-voters and those who refused to answer are excluded from the data on party support. The results are therefore only indicative…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 21:36:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316678#post316678</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316678#post316678</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						ah, so no neutral. thanks
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 21:33:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316676#post316676</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316676#post316676</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>For Party Support, percentages have been rounded up or down to whole numbers, except those less than 5%, which are reported to 1 decimal place. For all other figures percentages have been rounded up or down to whole numbers except those less than 1%, which are reported to 1 decimal…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 21:30:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316675#post316675</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316675#post316675</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The only intent counted is very or quite likely to vote &ndash; the others are quite or very unlikely to vote, or unsure.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 21:28:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316674#post316674</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316674#post316674</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It differs between each poll &ndash; in the link above you can see how much the base reduces from the total.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 21:23:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316673#post316673</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316673#post316673</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						ta. Hang on, that doesn't say why the only intent counted is very or quite likely, or what the other options were.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 21:21:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316672#post316672</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316672#post316672</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						If you check out <a href="http://www.colmarbrunton.co.nz/images/140701_ONE_News_Colmar_Brunton_Poll_report_21-25_June_2014.pdf " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> Page 7, Question Order and Wording</a>, that might help clear it up.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 21:21:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316671#post316671</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316671#post316671</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						so how many folk are you ditching from your denominator?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 21:17:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316670#post316670</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316670#post316670</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						words confuse
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 21:16:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316669#post316669</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316669#post316669</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Sorry – I probably wasn’t very clear.</p><p>Very or quite likely refers to likelihood to vote. Anyone else is unlikely to vote, so is not included in the party support analysis.</p><p>Weakly decided refers to those who haven’t made a decision, but say they are <em>likely</em> to vote for a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 21:09:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316668#post316668</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316668#post316668</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm confused. How does very or quite = weak?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 20:39:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316667#post316667</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316667#post316667</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						No, weakly decided likely voters are included too.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 20:33:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316665#post316665</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316665#post316665</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Everyone is asked who they would vote for, even if they’re unlikely to vote. However those less than ‘very’ or ‘quite’ likely to vote are filtered out at the analysis stage</q></p><p>So you're really only reporting on strongly-decided potential voters. What proportion of the total is that?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 18:58:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316664#post316664</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316664#post316664</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						everyone deserves a holiday :)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 18:54:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316663#post316663</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316663#post316663</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I’m sure Winston Peters wanted to ban polls for a certain amount of time before the election. This is one of the few policies of his I would like to try. </p><p>On an apparently unrelated issue in another country, I was just looking to see whatever happened with the vote…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 18:54:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316662#post316662</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316662#post316662</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'd love to try banning polls as an experiment &ndash; to see what influence this would have on politicians' claims during the banned period about where their party is polling (based on 'internal polls') and what the public think.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 18:33:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316659#post316659</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316659#post316659</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>By the way there are several countries where polls are banned for a period prior to the election date without any collapse in the society.</q></p><p>Yes, up to 10 days in most cases. Is this what you're suggesting? That's quite different to:</p><p><q>Given that, I’d argue they should be banned.</q>…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 18:10:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316658#post316658</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316658#post316658</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>do you mean out of all respondents or just the ones who have earned the leaner?</q></p><p>Out of all responses to the party vote question.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 18:02:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316657#post316657</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316657#post316657</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>those less than ‘very’ or ‘quite’ likely to vote are filtered out at the analysis stage</q></p><p>do you mean out of all respondents or just the ones who have earned the leaner?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 17:59:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316656#post316656</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316656#post316656</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>We use a leaner </q></p><p>just like pubs <br />and fancy office layouts (Russ will know what that refers to)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 17:57:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316654#post316654</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316654#post316654</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						that is ridiculously clever
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 17:56:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>stever@cs.waikato.ac.nz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316653#post316653</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316653#post316653</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						As ever on things newsy... <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0uE1qi2A68 " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> Chris Morris has it nailed</a> ...especially like the currency susan...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 17:52:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316652#post316652</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316652#post316652</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>That wasn’t what I said. I said the polls are deceptive. that is a totally different reason for banning them.</q></p><p>What did you actually mean by deceptive? It's a word that carries connotations of dishonesty.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 17:47:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316651#post316651</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316651#post316651</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>True, but there’s a complication in that different polling firms handle the likely-voter issue differently. Some push further towards saying “Okay, if you were going to vote, what would that vote be?”</p><p>Andrew will be able to explain what Colmar Brunton’s practice is there.</q></p><p>We use a leaner and we…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 17:46:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316649#post316649</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316649#post316649</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>“the information is low quality”</q></p><p>That wasn't what I said. I said the polls are deceptive. that is a totally different reason for banning them.</p><p>By the way there are several countries where polls are banned for a period prior to the election date without any collapse in the society.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 17:33:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Pete George</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316647#post316647</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316647#post316647</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>What would it take to establish a system of surveying public opinion on contentious bills going through Parliament, before the third reading? It should be in far more depth than a single petition/referendum question allows for (and the referendum/petition system takes far too long).</p><p>This could reasonably accurately inform Parliament…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 16:59:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Thomas Lumley</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316644#post316644</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316644#post316644</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But he does have a point (which he expressed on the show) that polls also play a hugely valuable role in establishing what the public really thinks on controversial issues.</q></p><p>If an issue is already controversial, this is much more valuable than a petition &mdash; it's really hard to get…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 16:39:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316643#post316643</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316643#post316643</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Given that, I’d argue they should be banned.</q></p><p>I was waiting for a kick off for this part of the debate :-)</p><p>No way, is my response. Hell no, even. It's news because people want to know it. You have to have a lot stronger argument than "the information is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 16:37:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316642#post316642</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316642#post316642</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						in what situation could Colin Craig be a polled answer?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 16:24:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316641#post316641</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316641#post316641</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>To be completely anal, we don’t want a representative sample of the population but only of the population that will actually vote on the day. </q></p><p>True, but there’s a complication in that different polling firms handle the likely-voter issue differently. Some push further towards saying “Okay, if you <em>were</em> going…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 16:24:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316640#post316640</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316640#post316640</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The difficulty is that those that choose not to vote may well choose to answer the polls and may at the time of the polling say they will vote.</q></p><p>I guess so, but every person polled could lie about anything. It's exactly the same problem.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 16:23:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316638#post316638</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316638#post316638</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>telegraphing the punchline...</strong><br /><q>wherever Colin Craig is standing...</q><br />... is a pole!</p><p></flagging a dead horse></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 16:16:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316637#post316637</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316637#post316637</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Does anyone know what plans there are to poll Epsom and wherever Colin Craig is standing?</q></p><p>I imagine Farrar will be doing them daily.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 15:55:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316636#post316636</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316636#post316636</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>a minor continuity cavil</strong><br />on the show, before the last break <br />you say "...after the break Toi looks at Matariki"<br />but he doesn't really, <br />it's all about the theatre company.<br />Matariki's just used as a segue pivot...<br />...bookending really...</p><p>Which was a shame, as root vegetable<br />planting aside, I wanted…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 15:50:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316633#post316633</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316633#post316633</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>what we are after is a proper representative sample</q></p><p>To be completely anal, we don't want a representative sample of the population but only of the population that will actually vote on the day. It's pretty clear that a significant percentage of the population make their political opinions felt by…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 15:37:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kevin McCready</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316631#post316631</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316631#post316631</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Ah for a NZ version of Hugh McKay, whose specialty is small, focus-group type research. Hugh is a great human being.  And I think the reason the news likes to focus on currencies is that they see it as part of  "the economy" which we all know doesn't exist and…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 15:34:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tim Michie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316630#post316630</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316630#post316630</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Living on the coattails of Epsom I'd say there's little worth polling the individual electorates (and Ōhariu) as either the candidates get in or National does but these minor parties' national party vote for whether an electorate win bring others into parliament a better spend of polling budget.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 15:20:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316628#post316628</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316628#post316628</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Does anyone know what plans there are to poll Epsom and wherever Colin Craig is standing?</q></p><p>I suspect that's a sort of 'we could tell you but...' type situation. :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 15:04:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Littlewood*</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316626#post316626</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316626#post316626</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>As the actress said to the bishop.</q></p><p>Roflnui.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 14:58:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Littlewood*</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316625#post316625</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316625#post316625</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>In the case of the Green Party, it would seem less correlated to undecided levels recently</q></p><p>True that. But then again, the Green Party is no longer small. To put it different, the bigger a party gets, the more it needs to retain, including by reactivating previous voters.</p><p>Small parties…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 14:54:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Thomas Lumley</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316624#post316624</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316624#post316624</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And I was able to tell the world that Maori Television’s news and current affairs division is poised to become a player this year. It will be polling all seven Maori electorates, at least two of which (Te Tai Tokerau and Waiariki) may be critical at a national level.<br /></q></p><p>That's…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 14:36:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316622#post316622</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316622#post316622</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the poll of polls</q></p><p>that could be another story for MediaTake to cover some time.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 13:59:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316621#post316621</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316621#post316621</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Excellent news. Thanks Andrew. You really seem to be doing it differently from most. </p><p>And yes indeed, what we are after is a proper representative sample. There are many more ways of obtaining low quality samples then just a low response rate. :-)</p><p>Slight correction (hey, being a statistician means…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 13:55:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316620#post316620</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316620#post316620</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thank you both for generously sharing your professional knowledge.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 13:54:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gavin White</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316619#post316619</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316619#post316619</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Andre &ndash; it's worth remembering that the Political Scientist Blog's conclusions were based on nine surveys.  Both Andrew and I have looked at our respective polls over the same period (20+ polls in both cases) and come to the same conclusion &ndash; undecideds have increased, but the increase is by…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 13:52:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gavin White</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316618#post316618</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316618#post316618</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks Russell for the opportunity to be on this show &ndash; and everyone else for their feedback.  Andrew's certainly been fighting the good fight to date!</p><p>One issue we discussed was TV3's reporting of NZ First's poll rating of 4.9% as definitely being below the threshold.  That's statistical nonsense, as…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 13:40:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316617#post316617</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316617#post316617</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Anybody from a research company want to tell us what your overall response rate is please? That is vital to know. As important as the percentage of undecided voters.</q></p><p>I'm planning a blog post about this. All surveys should report response rates. The problem is, NZ has no agreed upon…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 13:13:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andre</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316616#post316616</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316616#post316616</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The research groups' representatives gave a lot of weak excuses and no plans to change. The statement that undecided vote level is a bit higher than it was in "2012 and 2011" is downplaying the main point of Political Scientist's complaints that the level of undecided voters has risen markedly…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 13:06:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316615#post316615</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316615#post316615</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Small parties all rely on swing voters, much more so than N or L, who’s voters are more likely to know who they’ll vote for further out from the election.</q></p><p>It's really hard to know if that's true. In the case of the Green Party, it would seem less correlated…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 13:02:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316614#post316614</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316614#post316614</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>While not the same thing statistically, you have to be undecided before you swing.</q></p><p>As the actress said to the bishop.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 12:59:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316613#post316613</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316613#post316613</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I have trouble seeing the relevance that could be obtained by looking at longer term trends.</q></p><p>Which is curious, if you think about it, because the long term trends are what generates by far the biggest part of where we are, and what happened last night is a tiny contributor.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 12:58:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Littlewood*</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316612#post316612</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316612#post316612</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I think there may be  one thing we can say about undecideds. They are more likely to found among the supporters of smaller newer parties.</p><p>Small parties all rely on swing voters, much more so than N or L, who's voters are more likely to know who they'll vote for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 12:56:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316611#post316611</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316611#post316611</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The only story treated as being worth reporting seems to be how much it's fluctuated since the previous poll</q></p><p>Far easier to do that than actually provide intelligent analysis. It's like we have dogs reporting <em>"arf, the ball went over there.  woof, now it's in the air".</em> </p><p>And the currency…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 12:52:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316610#post316610</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316610#post316610</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>In other words, rather than explain the “swings” treat them all as examples of how much true variation is there. [--snip--] In both cases (election polling and share market reporting) commentators simply look for a recent event which might be top of mind and “explain” changes using that.</q></p><p>I've sometimes…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 12:45:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316606#post316606</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316606#post316606</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the Right remains largely and firmly with National.</q></p><p>Well, and there's NZF, whose sudden change in apparent support was a big story for the last election, and could well be again.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 12:29:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316605#post316605</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316605#post316605</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yes, and it's worth noting that decideds are not guaranteed to stay decided for what they decided, or even to stay decided at all.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 12:27:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>HORansome</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316604#post316604</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316604#post316604</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Enjoyed the show. It really has come together, hasn't it? Is it me, though, but in each iteration the theme tune for "Media <strong></strong>" seems to be getting slightly more ominous and darker...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 12:16:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316603#post316603</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316603#post316603</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>That’s one possibility, but we simply don’t know – at least, not based on the published polls. It could be that all the net new undecideds will go back to voting Labour (in which case the increase in National’s vote will disappear) or it could be that they will not…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 12:15:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316602#post316602</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316602#post316602</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Much more succinct than my raving, Thomas. Thank you.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 12:10:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Thomas Lumley</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316601#post316601</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316601#post316601</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						That's one possibility, but we simply don't know &mdash; at least, not based on the published polls. It could be that all the net new undecideds will go back to voting Labour (in which case the increase in National's vote will disappear) or it could be that they will not…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 12:06:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316600#post316600</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316600#post316600</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Not an “anomaly” sensu stricto . It might be better to say that the results may just be within the expected range of variation given the survey methodology.  When you take more than a simple random sample model of errors into account your more complete error model will widen the…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 12:03:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Littlewood*</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316599#post316599</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316599#post316599</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Apropos the first segment of gender and ethnicity in journalism, I wonder whether the Radio NZ restructure will bring any more brown voices to the airwaves? Currently, there's Eru Rerekura for 5 minutes twice a day, and another specialist show on Sunday afternoon, and that's about it.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 11:57:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316598#post316598</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316598#post316598</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Something that didn't come up in discussion on the show is that, while the NZ Polling Code is binding on all members of the Research Association, it has no jurisdiction over media organisations.</q></p><p>That's true, in the sense that an act of industry self-regulation has no jurisdiction over how that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 11:37:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316597#post316597</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316597#post316597</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Excellent opening night. Big ups to all participating, really like Toi Iti and his panel. But of course I dig this polling stuff big time.</p><p><q>In the current form, the data don’t really provide any evidence for extrapolation to the election.</q></p><p>I don't really see much that could do that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 11:36:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Littlewood*</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316596#post316596</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316596#post316596</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Watching it now. Great work Russell.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 11:34:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ianmac</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316595#post316595</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316595#post316595</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Maybe the high number of undecideds suggest that we should take poll result with a large spoonful of salt?<br />How about the proposition that the number of National supporters in most polls stayed about the same over 6 years or more? Therefore, if this is so, the apparent rise of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 11:31:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316594#post316594</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316594#post316594</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Something that didn't come up in discussion on the show is that, while the NZ Polling Code is binding on all members of the Research Association, it has no jurisdiction over media organisations.</p><p>In the research industry the clients own the report and all the data. The research company could…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 11:25:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316593#post316593</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-decidedly-undecided/?p=316593#post316593</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 11:25:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
