<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Hard News: &quot;Because we can&quot;</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270372#post270372</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270372#post270372</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Romney &ndash; Turd Containment Crews &ndash; Classic &ndash; the Comedy Central thing is the truth of the matter filtered via the humour of stating the bleeding obvious.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sept 2012 21:35:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270282#post270282</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270282#post270282</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Why is it that a hairdresser in Remuera is worth more than a hairdresser in Mangere?<br />Fact is that they are not, it is that their customers are richer. In a society that bases it's success on how much it consumes it is better to have a wealthier end user.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sept 2012 11:36:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rosie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270275#post270275</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270275#post270275</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I think the idea is to keep it simple and cheap to administer by having a flat tax rate. Nobody would pay any tax on the first $25k or so they earned because of the UBI. (Everyone gets it...even the workers). People who earn enough to acquire assets will pay…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sept 2012 11:03:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270271#post270271</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270271#post270271</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Social welfare has so long been linked to the idea of need, and stigmatized because of that, that most people can't imagine a system in which everyone gets it and no-one is stigmatized.</q></p><p>Egad, who would our unscrupulous pollies pick on instead?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sept 2012 10:48:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270270#post270270</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270270#post270270</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Libertarians put it that way, but I know of nothing to stop progressive rates or other arrangements being added alongside a UBI.</q></p><p>Nothing whatsoever. We do already have that for Super, after all, which is the semi-UBI.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sept 2012 10:29:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270268#post270268</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270268#post270268</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Yeah, it’s Gareth Morgan’s idea not mine….</q></p><p>It's an idea that's been around a very long time. At least since the 1930s. Probably before.</p><p>To me, it's a recognition of the right of <em>every</em> human in a country to benefit from all the capital built by all the generations before…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sept 2012 10:28:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270267#post270267</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270267#post270267</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It depends on a flat rate of income tax</q></p><p>Libertarians put it that way, but I know of nothing to stop progressive rates or other arrangements being added alongside a UBI. Other than 'efficiency' or suchlike, perhaps.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sept 2012 10:25:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270266#post270266</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270266#post270266</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>and allowing them to keep all the money they make if they get some temporary or part time work</q></p><p>As you note later, a UBI usually suggests taxing *all* additional income. </p><p>Better tax on wealth and assets would help make up for reduced overall personal take, would encourage investment into…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sept 2012 10:23:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rosie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270260#post270260</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270260#post270260</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yeah, it's Gareth Morgan's idea not mine....I read the Big Kahuna and thought the ideas were quite exciting.I would love to se Keith Ng do an analysis of the numbers. I suspect the numbers are sound, its just the concept lots of people would have trouble getting their head around.…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sept 2012 08:07:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270256#post270256</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270256#post270256</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>the caring government....</strong><br /><q>Instead of wasting masses of money administering a complicated benefits system and chasing people we could spend the money helping people. ….and we could call it a transfer not a benefit.</q><br />Where is the bus stop to this world, I want a ticket?<br />What's more I reckon…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sept 2012 06:50:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270253#post270253</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270253#post270253</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>We could help people become more independent by giving everyone a universal basic income and allowing them to keep all the money they make if they get some temporary or part time work. Instead of wasting masses of money administering a complicated benefits system and chasing people we could spend…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sept 2012 02:23:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270252#post270252</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270252#post270252</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>That's sensible &ndash; if there was a level playing field to begin with.<br />A lot of ANZers start off with the kind of physical security (homes/farms/wealth/assurred educational opportunities/good health provision etc,) that a lot of-actually MOST- other ANZers dont.</p><p>How do we form a just &amp; equal society? Remembering that we…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sept 2012 02:00:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rosie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270249#post270249</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270249#post270249</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						We could help people become more independent by giving everyone a universal basic income and allowing them to keep all the money they make if they get some temporary or part time work. Instead of wasting masses of money administering a complicated benefits system and chasing people we could spend…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sept 2012 21:44:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270244#post270244</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270244#post270244</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>n other words, “what’s good for Wall Street is good for America and the rest of the world.”</q></p><p>Yeah right &ndash; worked so well for us all eh?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sept 2012 17:59:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Felix Marwick</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270243#post270243</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270243#post270243</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>this is lifted from the q &amp; a section of the Minister’s press release released on Monday. It may, or may not, assist the discussion.</p><p><q>As at the end of August this year there were around 319,000 people or 11.6 per cent of working-age New Zealanders on benefits. More than 161,000…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sept 2012 17:43:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270242#post270242</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270242#post270242</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>In the past 5 years the world has socialised $trillions upon $trillions of bad losses made by mega rich too-big-to-fail banking conglomerates, because – according to apologists – they “must prosper for us to prosper”</q></p><p>In other words, "what's good for Wall Street is good for America and the rest…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sept 2012 17:14:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Angus Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270240#post270240</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270240#post270240</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The 1% succeed when they privatise profits and socialise risks. </p><p>This article deals with only half the problem.  </p><p><q>Stiglitz puts it this way, "We've been shaping our society to create people who are more selfish." Increasingly, policies are created by the richest 1%, and for the richest 1%. Their interests…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sept 2012 16:14:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270236#post270236</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270236#post270236</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the 12 Cookies joke</q></p><p>Thanks. <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stan-sorscher/wealth-inequality_b_1656698.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Useful point</a> about what's been so lacking from our own political discourse over recent years.</p><p><q>Stiglitz puts it this way, "We've been shaping our society to create people who are more selfish." Increasingly, policies are created by the richest 1%, and for the richest 1%.…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sept 2012 13:42:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270231#post270231</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270231#post270231</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>some enlightening answers</q></p><p>thanks. revealing</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sept 2012 13:07:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270228#post270228</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270228#post270228</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>That Black Triangle campaign on Facebook has a lot of very useful and interesting stuff about the welfare cuts in the UK, disability activism and political hypocrisy.</q></p><p>I thought of the idea of the black triangle before I even knew about their Web site. Even then, it was only a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sept 2012 13:01:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270227#post270227</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270227#post270227</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The "How taxes Work" joke and it is a joke, fails at the first test. Governments don't run restaurants, they produce piles of paper and gusts of luke warm foul smelling air. The second fail is that the poorest would not be allowed in the same restaurant, let alone the…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sept 2012 12:47:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hilary Stace</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270225#post270225</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270225#post270225</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>That Black Triangle campaign on Facebook has a lot of very useful and interesting stuff about the welfare cuts in the UK, disability activism and political hypocrisy. We are following a couple of years behind but so many similarities.</p><p>There are also some enlightening answers from the Minister to written…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sept 2012 12:04:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270222#post270222</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270222#post270222</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I think this phrase should be subverted for use describing the braying of goats coming from the House of Parliament</q></p><p>I've heard of "Daddy State" and "Angry Stepfather State", but they haven't yet caught on in a big way.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sept 2012 11:43:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270221#post270221</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270221#post270221</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>but people want someone to blame. That’s all you need for bs politics to gain traction: a good, emotionally satisfying anecdote will invalidate all rational statistical perspectives.</q></p><p>Once again, I'm reminded of the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stan-sorscher/wealth-inequality_b_1656698.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">12 Cookies joke</a> that sprung up in the wake of the Great Recession. And it's the perfect…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sept 2012 11:40:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270214#post270214</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270214#post270214</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>“Nanny State”</q><br />I think this phrase should be subverted for use describing the braying of goats coming from the House of Parliament &ndash; watching Key wittering drunkenly on about Planet Key, goaded on by the rest of the lower fifth form bullies, was just embarrassing &ndash; can we have random…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sept 2012 10:01:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270213#post270213</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270213#post270213</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Gio and Hilary linked to this on Facebook: <a href="http://blacktrianglecampaign.org/2012/06/14/how-the-public-massively-overestimates-benefit-fraud/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">How the Public Massively Overestimates Benefit Fraud</a></p><p>It's talking about England, but seems pretty relevant to this government's <em>modus operandi</em>. (And, uh, David Shearer's lately. Thanks a bunch, Shearer.)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sept 2012 10:00:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270210#post270210</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270210#post270210</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The only reason it has come out this week is that Obama’s foreign policy needs a distraction now. The Libyan military intervention has been so unsuccessful that the people of Benghazi spent a day dragging the corpse of the US ambassodor around the streets.</q></p><p>Hardly.</p><p>A series of polls are…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sept 2012 09:39:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Withers</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270209#post270209</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270209#post270209</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						“Bullshit politicking” can work because everyone knows someone (or knows someone who knows someone) who is sitting around on the benefit having babies. I, personally, witnessed this over the past few years. The gang connections. The boy-racer cars. The low-level drug dealing. No one has a job. Quiet periods while…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sept 2012 09:32:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270208#post270208</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270208#post270208</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Not trolling, but this does sound awfully like the rhetoric heard before Bush got re-elected…….</q></p><p>On the other hand, John Kerry was never in <a href="http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/09/pew-dnc-obama-romney-poll-democratic-enthusiasm.php" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the very strong position Obama is at this stage of the race</a>.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sept 2012 09:31:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>81stcolumn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270203#post270203</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270203#post270203</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Mitt Romney is pretty much a perpetual political idiot...........The fear that he could be the next President should be more than enough motivation.</q></p><p>Not trolling, but this does sound awfully like the rhetoric heard before Bush got re-elected.......</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sept 2012 09:00:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270166#post270166</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270166#post270166</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The only reason it has come out this week is that Obama's foreign policy needs a distraction now.</q></p><p>I just don't think so &ndash; Mojo isn't in anyone's pocket.</p><p>Mitt Romney is pretty much a perpetual political idiot &ndash; the only time he takes one foot out of his mouth…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sept 2012 19:46:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270157#post270157</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270157#post270157</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Reecent events suggest Paula Benefit and Mitt Romney have been brain storming &ndash; lots of storm and not much brain.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sept 2012 19:22:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Aston</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270141#post270141</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270141#post270141</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I would also note that this statistic does not demonstrate benefit capture.</q></p><p>Whats that?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sept 2012 16:37:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270137#post270137</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270137#post270137</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Okay &mdash; it looks like we have the third and final answer on the minister's statistics, <a href="http://lindsaymitchell.blogspot.co.nz/2012/09/time-spent-on-welfare-update.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">thanks to Lindsay Mitchell</a>:</p><p><q>For the record, the Ministerial Q &amp; A sheet says,  </p><p>"More than 161,000 people have received a benefit for at least half of the last 10 years and 139,000 have spent…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sept 2012 16:14:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270135#post270135</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270135#post270135</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Ta. Not holding my breath.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sept 2012 16:11:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lilith __</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270132#post270132</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270132#post270132</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Too much for a short answer. Once I’ve set up my own blog perhaps. Or if some public agency wants to pay for my expertise – whichever comes first.</q></p><p>Will look fwd to reading.  Hope for you it's option (b). :-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sept 2012 16:01:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270130#post270130</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270130#post270130</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Too much for a short answer. Once I've set up my own blog perhaps. Or if some public agency wants to pay for my expertise &ndash; whichever comes first.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sept 2012 15:29:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tim Michie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270122#post270122</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270122#post270122</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>The irony being, of course, that the states where fewest people pay federal income tax are in the Republican South. 2008 Obama votes were concentrated in higher-income states.</q> <a href="https://gs1.wac.edgecastcdn.net/8019B6/data.tumblr.com/tumblr_maay91IWdg1rudmvvo1_1280.png" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Who Votes in America</a> infographic love.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sept 2012 14:39:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lilith __</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270120#post270120</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270120#post270120</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Interesting the phrase “Nanny State” has not been resurfaced by the media – the degree of proposed intervention in families is surely deep enough to qualify .</q></p><p>"Nanny State" is an epithet only used when the Left is trying to help people.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sept 2012 14:29:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lilith __</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270119#post270119</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270119#post270119</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> <em>Everybody wants sick and disabled people to achieve all they’re capable of, right?</em></p><p>Our common expectations about that capability and its real impact are the underlying problem.</q></p><p>Care to elaborate on what you mean, Sacha?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sept 2012 14:28:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Aston</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270117#post270117</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270117#post270117</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Interesting the phrase "Nanny State" has not been resurfaced by the media &ndash; the degree of proposed intervention in families is surely deep enough to qualify .
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sept 2012 14:08:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270116#post270116</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270116#post270116</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> It doesn't answer the moral question of why it's proper to threaten beneficiaries with financial sanctions for the good of their children, but not WFF recipients </q><br />Which would still not answer the moral question of why it's proper to legally force the kids of people that "receive direct tax/payment assistance"…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sept 2012 13:56:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270113#post270113</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270113#post270113</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Everybody wants sick and disabled people to achieve all they’re capable of, right?</q></p><p>Our common expectations about that capability and its real impact are the underlying problem.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sept 2012 13:41:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270111#post270111</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270111#post270111</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>  The Libyan military intervention has been so unsuccessful that the people of Benghazi spent a day dragging the corpse of the US ambassodor around the streets.</q></p><p>Exaggerate, much?<br /><a href="http://www.ndtv.com/article/world/video-shows-libyans-trying-to-rescue-us-ambassador-268678 " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> Video shows Libyans trying to rescue US ambassador</a><br /><q>"There was not a single ambulance to carry him. Maybe he was…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sept 2012 12:45:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Llewellyn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270108#post270108</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270108#post270108</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Different perceptions of the same events I guess Angus (like a Kurosawa movie). I watched the Mother Jones video and thought it showed that (granted in the context of an election strategy run-down) Romney holds many millions of Americans in contempt for not being able to or not wanting to…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sept 2012 12:26:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lilith __</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270104#post270104</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270104#post270104</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Many people currently receiving the Invalid Benefit would welcome access to support to get some part-time work</q></p><p>I think with sympathetic mentoring and better access to appropriate healthcare, a lot of people on health-related benefits would be less sick.  Everybody wants sick and disabled people to achieve all they’re capable…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sept 2012 12:00:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270098#post270098</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270098#post270098</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But I presume the minister and Ms Rebstock haven't thought it through like that. It would require more empathy than they typically display.</q></p><p>It would also require them sourcing better advice. One member of the Welfare Working Group and the subsequent <a href="http://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/new-board-oversee-work-and-income-performance" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Work and Income oversight Board</a> has only a 'rehabilitation'…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sept 2012 11:04:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Angus Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270096#post270096</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270096#post270096</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The motherjones link is a hidden camera sting of Romney talking to a bunch of very wealthy donors where he is telling them what thay want to hear, like any politician does.  Its a smear of the type normally used in the last few days of a campaign, when it…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sept 2012 10:52:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270095#post270095</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270095#post270095</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It would require more empathy than they typically display.</q><br />And just wait until Health Minister Ryall gets wind of <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2203550/GPs-given-cash-bribes-send-patients-hospital--Practices-promised-26-000-cut-referrals.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this initiative...</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sept 2012 10:26:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270093#post270093</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270093#post270093</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Expect wholesale reclassification as in the UK. That does have some upsides, to be fair. Many people currently receiving the Invalid Benefit would welcome access to support to get some part-time work (see Greens income support spokesperson Jan Logie discussing her conversations with People First).</q></p><p>But what the government is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sept 2012 10:15:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270091#post270091</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270091#post270091</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I think that when the Tea Party wake up and realise…</q>Thing is, those people are permanent somnambulists when it comes to realising anything approaching truth.<br /> I had just finished reading the Michael Lewis’ Vanity Fair article on Obama and was wading through the comments, needless to say the Tea Baggers…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sept 2012 10:09:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Reeves</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270090#post270090</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270090#post270090</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Her original statement seems (designed??) to suggest that people have been on benefits for five years in one continuous block of time (i.e. they went on one day, and came off it five years later with no movement in between), whereas, when I first read it I though: but perhaps…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sept 2012 10:04:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270089#post270089</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270089#post270089</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Expect wholesale reclassification as in the UK. That does have some upsides, to be fair. Many people currently receiving the Invalid Benefit would welcome access to support to get some part-time work (see Greens income support spokesperson Jan Logie <a href="http://blog.greens.org.nz/2012/09/18/take-your-vitamins-nz/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">discussing her conversations</a> with People First).</p><p>However the solution to that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sept 2012 10:01:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270088#post270088</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270088#post270088</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>half or more of the people in question are on invalids benefits and aren’t subject to the measures Bennett says will fix the problem.</q></p><p>Yet.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sept 2012 09:55:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>jb</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270083#post270083</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270083#post270083</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Democratic campaign ad: "I'm a Democrat, one of the 47% who'll vote for Obama for sure. I pay taxes. Here are my tax returns for the past 10 years to prove it. Now show me YOURS, Mr Romney"
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sept 2012 09:04:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270081#post270081</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270081#post270081</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I think that when the Tea Party wake up and realise that it was them that Romney was talking about as the 47% things will get really interesting ....
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sept 2012 08:44:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270078#post270078</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270078#post270078</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>David Shearer’s researcher Lamia Imam has directed me to <a href="http://igps.victoria.ac.nz/WelfareWorkingGroup/Downloads/Working%20papers/CSRE-Who-uses-the-benefit-system-and-for-how-long.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Who uses the benefit system and for how long?</a> , which was prepared by VUW researchers for the Welfare Working Group.</p><p>And in particular, p17, which says that as of June 2009 among recipients aged 28-64, <strong>171,100</strong> (or two thirds of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sept 2012 08:13:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270077#post270077</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270077#post270077</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>He won't be the brightest, perhaps<br />But he'll be the whitest<br />And I'll vote for that</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvLeQbwuKys" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvLeQbwuKys</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sept 2012 07:33:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270076#post270076</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270076#post270076</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>The Romney strategy is to focus on is the 5 to 10 % of swinging voters. He, in the Mother Jones link, lumps the 47% ( of those who want social policy in the form of health care, housing and welfare) as votes for Obama and as a goup people…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sept 2012 07:04:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270069#post270069</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270069#post270069</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Ae, tautoko- sweet dreams (if possible.)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 23:34:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270066#post270066</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270066#post270066</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm tired, so excuse me this short hard; Bennett's a shit Minister, her policies are arcane, her grasp of her portfolio is weak, she's even crap as the faux authentic Western Chick that Key cast her as. NatRad were way too polite to her. That's an interview that should've been…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 23:18:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Chris Waugh</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270061#post270061</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270061#post270061</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>What shocked me about Romney's rant was this:</p><p><q>who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it.</q></p><p>Um, what? Health, nutrition, and shelter from the elements are "entitlements", right up there with McMansion and private jet ownership? Romney would really deny people medical treatment,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 22:57:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Telfar Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270057#post270057</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270057#post270057</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yep.  I think Romney voters will think (the US slang equivalent of) "Too bloody right, half the population are just a bunch of scroungers, living off MY taxes".  i.e. so long as they consider themselves to not belong to the 47%, they're perfectly happy for Mick to describe other people…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 22:40:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270056#post270056</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270056#post270056</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The Romney strategy is to focus on is the 5 to 10 % of swinging voters.  He, in the   Mother Jones link, lumps the 47% ( of those who want social policy in the form of health care, housing and welfare) as votes for Obama and as a goup people…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 22:38:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270055#post270055</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270055#post270055</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And I once again cite Chris Hayes’ Twilight of the Elites, where he basically explains that meritocracy, done wrong, turns into a law unto itself.</q></p><p>Thanks Deep Red &ndash; will obtain and read that-</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 22:36:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alastair Thompson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270051#post270051</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270051#post270051</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I wonder if for this reason the Romney tape may not be quite as damaging as it looks. If the disgruntled look at the number 47% then they will be offended and patronised, but if they look at the description of "dependence" and "idleness" they will be back to feeling…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 21:57:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270048#post270048</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270048#post270048</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yes; but now wait for the disgruntled middle classes <em>not</em> to see that. The really really annoying thing about this strategy is that, largely, it’s been working [in terms of maintaining support for National, rather than doing anything productive for NZ] – partly because the disgruntled middle-class subset of the…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 21:43:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Che Tibby</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270046#post270046</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270046#post270046</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>They’re presenting the numbers so as emphasise dependence over mobility.</q></p><p>it would be hard to not see recent numbers being produced as anything but a well-orchestrated campaign to soften up the disgruntled middle classes.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 21:36:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270043#post270043</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270043#post270043</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Doing the numbers this way supports the ideological decision to frame the core issue as ‘dependence’. Watch those nutbar WWG terms of reference produce their natural outcomes..</q></p><p>Sadly, I think you’re right. They’re presenting the numbers so as emphasise dependence over mobility.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 21:28:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270041#post270041</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270041#post270041</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But that's not how the average person would have heard it &mdash; and it completely defeats the claim about people being intractably on benefits. </q></p><p>Doing the numbers this way supports the ideological decision to frame the core issue as 'dependence'. Watch those nutbar WWG terms of reference produce their natural…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 21:18:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270040#post270040</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270040#post270040</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>To me, she has a touch of the Christine Rankin's &ndash; been there, got into a position of power, now feel free to demonise those rely on state assistance...whilst enjoying all the vast privilages of the jobs they now have.</p><p>In all this debate, what has happened to the "social"…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 21:16:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270039#post270039</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270039#post270039</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Certainly hope so...what is it with these billionaire creatures and their total disconnect with the rest of humanity? Money turns your brain into a sleazy self-reguarding wax?</q></p><p>In the words of Bruce Springsteen's "Badlands":</p><p>"Poor man wanna be rich<br />Rich man wanna be king<br />King ain't satisfield 'till he rules…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 21:10:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270038#post270038</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270038#post270038</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Just to be correct she didn’t say (as Keith says in the spreadsheet) there were 161,000 beneficiaries who’d been on a benefit for 5 out of the 10 years, she said “people”. In theory they could all be working now but had been on benefits for 5 of the last…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 21:08:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Aotearoan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270036#post270036</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270036#post270036</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I have had to admit to a giggle as 2 Nat Rad announcers recently, whilst reporting on the MSD changes, referred to "Paula Benefit".</p><p>To me, she has a touch of the Christine Rankin's &ndash; been there, got into a position of power, now feel free to demonise those rely…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 20:57:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270035#post270035</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270035#post270035</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>it’s more likely to be someone like a 45-year-old women who suffers from depression and stress</p></blockquote><p>True. It's also worth factoring in <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/6712729/NZs-welfare-hot-spots-revealed" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">unemployment hotspots</a>. Without significant incentives, key employers have defected to greener pastures, gutting regions.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 20:40:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Euan Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270034#post270034</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270034#post270034</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>A popular image of a long-term unemployed person might be a fit young dude who’d rather spend his days smoking weed with his bros than working, and could easily join a road works gang tomorrow. But the report reveals it’s more likely to be someone like a 45-year-old women who…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 20:40:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Glenn Pearce</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270032#post270032</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270032#post270032</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Just to be correct she didn't say (as Keith says in the spreadsheet) there were 161,000 beneficiaries who'd been on a benefit for 5 out of the 10 years, she said "people". In theory they could all be working now but <strong>had</strong> been on benefits for 5 of the last…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 20:38:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Robyn Gallagher</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270029#post270029</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270029#post270029</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I've just found a fascinating 2003 paper from the Ministry of Social Development titled <a href="http://www.msd.govt.nz/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-resources/working-papers/wp-04-04-barriers-to-employment.html " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> Barriers to Employment Among Long-Term Beneficiaries: A Review of Recent International Evidence</a>.</p><p>A popular image of a long-term unemployed person might be a fit young dude who'd rather spend his days smoking weed with…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 20:15:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Euan Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270028#post270028</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270028#post270028</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And with that, Keith appeared. he says:</p><p>    At Jun-12, 64,648 people on a main benefit have been on a benefit for >10 years. 69,449 for >4-10 years. Figures include people who have changed benefits over this time.</p><p>So, roughly speaking, the minister doubled the numbers. And no one called her…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 20:13:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270023#post270023</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270023#post270023</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>“I’m dreaming, of a Macdonalds burger”</q></p><p>That reminds of when I was 12, collecting baggage carts around LA airport (paying a quarter each).  Lingering around the check-in counter in a scraggy T and jeans when one kind soul, looking me up and down, took pity and gave me a dollar.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 19:38:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270022#post270022</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270022#post270022</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And with that, Keith appeared. he says:</p><p><q>At Jun-12, 64,648 people on a main benefit have been on a benefit for >10 years. 69,449 for >4-10 years. Figures include people who have changed benefits over this time. </q></p><p>So, roughly speaking, the minister <em>doubled</em> the numbers. And no one called her…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 19:31:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>tussock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270021#post270021</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270021#post270021</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>I think it does become that safety net and I think over time what it instead has become is a bit of a trap for quite a few people when we've seen 161,000 people have been on for at least five of the last 10 (and) 139,000 for at least…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 19:23:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270020#post270020</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270020#post270020</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Hound dogging them around...</strong><br /><q>Isn't this a job for Keith Ng?</q><br />Hmmm, intriguingly, Keith Ng<br />is an anagram of The King!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 19:17:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270016#post270016</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270016#post270016</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Bless Sof!I dont believe in deities but I do believe in humane humans…</q></p><p>Hey, you should see the library. I kept thinking , those kids should sleep in here. It is a remarkable building. ;)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 18:41:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270015#post270015</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270015#post270015</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Taxpayer funded (beneficiaries included because they also pay tax) to learn how to screw up  vulnerable people</q><br />It's just to get the knee jerkers to vote for all the "good" stuff national are doing to the country. As long as you punish the people nobody wants to be you will…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 18:31:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270014#post270014</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270014#post270014</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>The words on one of the wee signs in front of them said “I’m dreaming, of a Macdonalds burger”. What I saw was so many people striding past these kids (about 10 years old) and noone noticed them at all. My shopping spree consisted of donating to their dream and…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 18:28:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270011#post270011</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270011#post270011</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Found <a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA1206/S00363/reducing-long-term-benefit-dependence.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this from Bennett in June</a>:</p><p><q>In July 2013 about 130,000 people will move on to the new Jobseeker Support, of which 78,000 will have been on working-age benefits for more than 12 months.</q></p><p>Wasn't sure how much of the system that captured, but based on the <a href="http://www.msd.govt.nz/about-msd-and-our-work/work-programmes/better-public-services/long-term-welfare-dependence/index.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">public service goals</a>:…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 18:17:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270009#post270009</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270009#post270009</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Certainly hope so...what is it with these billionaire creatures and their total disconnect with the rest of humanity? Money turns your brain into a sleazy self-reguarding wax?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 18:11:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270006#post270006</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270006#post270006</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>A minor gaffe? That’s not how it’s playing out- </q></p><p>He's fucked.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 17:54:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270002#post270002</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=270002#post270002</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>If you want some distraction, Mitt Romney's <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/09/secret-video-romney-private-fundraiser" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">views on beneficiaries</a> (that is: all Democrats) are helping making sure he loses the election. <br />A minor gaffe? That's not how it's playing out- already on the front page of the NYT.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 17:36:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269999#post269999</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269999#post269999</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=8867" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">And now for a blast from the past</a>...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 17:19:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269998#post269998</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269998#post269998</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And in Canada, there's another Bennett that became infamous during the Great Depression.</q></p><p>That's it. She is the Highlander.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 17:19:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Heather Gaye</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269990#post269990</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269990#post269990</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Even taking that into account, it strains credibility that 43% of beneficiaries have been on one for 10 years continuously &ndash; that's got to be an error, surely.</q></p><p>I've been doing a bit of my own research on this recently. The grant and cancellation figures on the MSD website suggest…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 16:50:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Aston</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269988#post269988</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269988#post269988</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>it's all relative</q></p><p>Ok good spotting Sacha ..  well whanau is whanau but we have very tight boundaries around work and politics. Whanau is way more important than politics which is why we have such good boundaries. </p><p>So I am on my own with getting information here.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 16:44:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269986#post269986</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269986#post269986</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						We even paid for her to tot off to the US. to learn how to do this. Taxpayer funded (beneficiaries included <em>because</em> they also pay tax) to learn how to screw up  vulnerable people and if anyone has wandered around streets in the States (pick any town, they all participate),…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 16:40:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alastair Thompson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269985#post269985</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269985#post269985</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						If Bennett is using Taylor Fry numbers  calculated in this manner  then the word continuous is being interpreted in a peculiar fashion.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 16:28:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alastair Thompson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269984#post269984</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269984#post269984</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						This looks to me like classic smoke and mirrors. Much the same thing can be achieved via public service restructuring. Obfuscation of the figures and a new set of quarterly numbers only for comparisons vs monthly now. Is this correct?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 16:25:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ben McNicoll</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269983#post269983</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269983#post269983</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Taylor Fry uses a sum of all beneficiaries within a benefit quarter instead of the numbers at a point time within the quarter</q></p><p>Thus artifically inflating the numbers as there will be some who were on and off within that time.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 16:25:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alec Morgan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269981#post269981</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269981#post269981</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Paula Bennett has acquired the most (around 15) derogative nicknames “Benefat, Pullya Benefit, Puller Benefit” etc. plus Sophie’s,  for some years for any minister bar the ‘Prime Mincer’.</p><p>Can that dislike for the face of legislating away genuine support for vulnerable kiwis be turned into action? AAAP had a go…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 16:16:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269980#post269980</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269980#post269980</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						it's all <em>relative</em>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 16:16:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Cormack</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269978#post269978</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269978#post269978</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Isn't this a job for Keith Ng?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 16:13:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alastair Thompson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269977#post269977</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269977#post269977</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I vote for made it up on the basis of the evidence till this point in the thread.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 16:12:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Angus Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269975#post269975</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269975#post269975</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Well, that explains how the government might help. It doesn't answer the moral question of why it's proper to threaten beneficiaries with financial sanctions for the good of their children, but not WFF recipients. It would be no more difficult to make WFF support conditional in the same way as…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 16:11:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Aston</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269974#post269974</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269974#post269974</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Or Richard, the answers should be easier for you to get than the rest of us. :)</q></p><p>???</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 16:09:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Chris Miller</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269973#post269973</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269973#post269973</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Wait so they're targeting beneficiaries because beneficiaries come into the offices all the time to get help? But... the ones who come in don't need to be targeted with sanctions, because they're coming in to get help already and being proactive. It's the mythical hordes that aren't being proactive that…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 16:04:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Psycho Milt</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269971#post269971</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269971#post269971</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>Has Lindsay Mitchell explained it in Gordon Campbell's comments section, difference between "continuous" and "average all-up duration" as she calls it ?</em></p><p>Maybe.  MSD reported just over half of DPB recipients in a 10-year period had been supported by a main benefit for 80% of the period observed (said period…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 16:03:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269970#post269970</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269970#post269970</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Definitely not super &mdash; that's not among the "main benefits"</q></p><p>Super is, of course, <a href="http://wheresmytaxes.co.nz/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">five times more expensive</a> than the next benefit category. But it's for old people, who are considered Us, not Them.</p><p>See, the demonization of beneficiaries serves several purposes to our rulers:<br />&ndash; generating an underclass such…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 15:57:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269969#post269969</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269969#post269969</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>where the ones with 14 year olds are categorized</q></p><p>I suspect beneficiaries with children over that age will be moved onto the Job-Seeker benefit.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 15:55:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269968#post269968</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269968#post269968</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I can't square this circle without a Ph.D. in Cthulhuian geometry, but here's something to distract y'all. Remember: We can-can-can!  </p><p><a href="http://youtu.be/yef_zvyt8_w" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://youtu.be/yef_zvyt8_w</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 15:55:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269967#post269967</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269967#post269967</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>For instance, this from p5 of the 'Key findings and background facts' doc might be relevant &ndash; sounds a bit like cumes:</p><p><q>Taylor Fry uses a sum of all beneficiaries within a benefit quarter instead of the numbers at a point time within the quarter</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 15:54:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269966#post269966</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269966#post269966</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Bennett had her patsy question about the restructuring of categories for beneficiaries asked today in question time and she said the UB will go up to about 135,000 as she includes those on a sickness benefit and those on the dpb with youngest children 14 years or over. The new…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 15:51:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269965#post269965</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269965#post269965</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>For someone with more time than me: the MSD <a href="http://www.msd.govt.nz/about-msd-and-our-work/newsroom/media-releases/2012/valuation-report.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">media release</a> about the Taylor-Fry report has downloadable documents that may have some of the answers about numbers. </p><p>Or Richard, the answers should be easier for you to get than the rest of us. :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 15:51:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269964#post269964</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269964#post269964</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Considering a fair portion are solo parents it would be a stretch to double that figure to get the number of parents but I’d gues its less than 150 – 170,000 parents on all main benefits. Seems like pretty well all of them have been on benefits forever .</q></p><p>Which…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 15:48:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Aston</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269962#post269962</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269962#post269962</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I’m trying to get a context for those numbers quoted on Nine to Noon.  <br /><a href="http://statistical-report-2011.msd.govt.nz/main+benefits/dependent+children" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Over here</a> MSD says there are 234,632 children ( aged 0 -18 ) “dependent on recipients of a main benefit” . The average family size in NZ is around 2.2 so thats 106,600 families dependant on…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 15:32:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269961#post269961</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269961#post269961</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Bennettvilles.</q></p><p>Pullya Benefitville<br />The opposition is angry in the House today with regard Hekia Parata School closures in Chch.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 15:32:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269958#post269958</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269958#post269958</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I'm not the only one to think the $78bn cited in the Taylor Fry report has 'big lie' written all over it.</p><p>If worst comes to worst and tent cities or shantytowns spring up, there's already a name for them:</p><p>Bennettvilles.</p><p>And in Canada, there's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_B._Bennett,_1st_Viscount_Bennett" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">another Bennett</a> that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bennett_buggy" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">became infamous</a>…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 15:27:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Chris Waugh</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269956#post269956</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269956#post269956</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The question I'm asking is where the hell did Paula Bennett get those numbers? Was she honestly mistaken in mixing up different sets of figures? Or...?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 15:22:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Aston</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269954#post269954</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269954#post269954</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Not really Ben &ndash; I am trying to work though them now but the answer given by the Minister... "161,000 people have been on for at least five of the last 10 (and) 139,000 for at least 10 years." was presumably in response to the questions about parents on benefits…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 15:06:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lilith __</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269953#post269953</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269953#post269953</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Bennett said, "Because we can", Obama said, "Yes, we can!", but I think their meaning was different. <ashamed for NZ>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 14:53:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Graham</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269949#post269949</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269949#post269949</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm STILL waiting to see what firm numbers there are on who is "ripping off" the welfare system. There is much talk around targeting those who breed on the system and use social welfare as their lifestyle choice but no-one, ever, to my knowledge has ever quantified just how many…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 14:45:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269948#post269948</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269948#post269948</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Do the numbers make more sense if you include sickness and/or superannuation?</q></p><p>Definitely not super &mdash; that's not among the "main benefits". It possibly relates to invalid benefits, but there are only 83,000 of those, and they definitely haven't all been in receipt for 10+ years. They're also not to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 14:45:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Glenn Pearce</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269947#post269947</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269947#post269947</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Has Lindsay Mitchell explained it in Gordon Campbell's comments section, difference between "continuous" and "average all-up duration" as she calls it ?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 14:41:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ben Curran</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269944#post269944</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269944#post269944</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Do the numbers make more sense if you include sickness and/or superannuation?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 14:32:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269943#post269943</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-because-we-can/?p=269943#post269943</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sept 2012 14:32:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
