<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Hard News: Approved by lunchtime</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358943#post358943</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358943#post358943</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Reference posted in the drug harm index thread, copied here as being equally relevant to this thread: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b076v9zj" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Psychadelic Science</a><br />a BBC Radio 4 program asking, basically, whether anyone is competent to understand and adjudicate uses and results of magic mushrooms: <q>Jamie Bartlett asks if new research into psychedelic drugs will…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 09:55:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358942#post358942</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358942#post358942</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Take this <br /><q>it’s Ok to make rules and laws that are wrong – because democracy.</q><br />and add<br /><q> <strong>Is your political ideology in your head? </strong><br />The differences between conservatives and liberals may be psychologically fundamental<br />...<br />The research, led by the University of Nebraska-Lincoln's Mark Mills, revealed that negativity bias…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 09:37:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358898#post358898</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358898#post358898</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Where I get grumpy (alright grumpier) is the idea that 95% of the scientific community is say X, but Mr Concerned of Mt Roskill presents unsupported blog to the contrary and for some bizarre reason that must be given equal weight by our MP because [insert insane reason here].</q></p><p>For…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 20:10:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358866#post358866</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358866#post358866</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Chaps, if you've concluded your learned discussion here, could you pop over to today's post and assess <a href="http://publicaddress.net/hardnews/labours-medical-cannabis-bill-and-a-new-drug/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the new New Zealand Drug Harm Index</a> for me?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 14:44:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358863#post358863</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358863#post358863</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But what actions that “taking into account” leads to are far more complex than just taking the advice of whoever produced that evidence.</q></p><p>Which is true sometimes.</p><p>Where I get grumpy (alright grumpier) is the idea that 95% of the scientific community is say X, but Mr Concerned of Mt…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 14:09:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Mayes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358861#post358861</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358861#post358861</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Mr Peter Dung<br />Minister of Bums on Seats<br />The Beehive<br />Wellington</p><p>Dear Mr Dung</p><p>Your application for a special dispensation to prevent a citizen of New Zealand from freely smoking whatever substances he  wants to smoke in his own home has been DECLINED for the following reasons:</p><p>1) Not enough…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:46:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358851#post358851</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358851#post358851</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So … you agree with me that our representatives need to take into account evidence when they make laws.</q></p><p>Absolutely. But what actions that "taking into account" leads to are far more complex than just taking the advice of whoever produced that evidence. In the same way that a courtroom…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 12:33:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358849#post358849</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358849#post358849</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>“being scientifically literate” does not imply “having direct experience of being a working scientist”, in much the same way as<br />“being competent to understand and adjudicate uses and results of magic” does not imply “being able to cast spells”.</q></p><p>No, but it sure would help.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 12:22:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358828#post358828</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358828#post358828</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> in much the same way as<br />“being competent to understand and adjudicate uses and results of magic” does not imply “being able to cast spells”.</q></p><p>I am enjoying this argument.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 22:44:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358824#post358824</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358824#post358824</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But "evidence based" also raises the question of whose evidence to consider and whose lens to use to interpret it.</q></p><p>Agreed.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 19:01:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew  Hooton</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358816#post358816</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358816#post358816</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I can’t speak for Matthew, but I think this is an overly simplistic representation of his argument. </q></p><p>I'm not really making a big passionate argument.  Just that there are some things that can't really be evidence based, such as funding the arts, or Rugby World Cups or much of what…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 16:02:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358815#post358815</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358815#post358815</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Not quite (and Bart didn’t ask for exactly that level of knowledge either):<br />“being scientifically literate” does not imply “having direct experience of being a working scientist”, in much the same way as<br />“being competent to understand and adjudicate uses and results of magic” does not imply “being able to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 15:24:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358812#post358812</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358812#post358812</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Yes, just as the Minister of Magic should probably be a wizard. </q></p><p>I'd never thought about this before, but you're right.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 13:54:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358811#post358811</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358811#post358811</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> It looks to me like a necessary but not sufficient condition of the job of a representative.</q></p><p>So ... you agree with me that our representatives <em>need</em> to take into account evidence when they make laws.</p><p>Dude that's all I want and that's all I said.</p><p>The problem with the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 13:48:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358808#post358808</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358808#post358808</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What Mathew was saying was it’s Ok to make rules and laws that are wrong – because democracy.</q></p><p>I can't speak for Matthew, but I think this is an overly simplistic representation of his argument. It's more just a rejection of what you are saying is a straw man, that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:43:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358807#post358807</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358807#post358807</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So her oncologist wasn’t well-enough informed to realise that Sativex would not do what she wanted? A system that relies on that group of practitioners for information won’t work then. Imagine if there was a national health organisation that hired researchers and policy people ..</q></p><p>For the system, Sativex's overwhelming…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:37:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358806#post358806</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358806#post358806</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>What Mathew was saying was it's Ok to make rules and laws that are wrong &ndash; because democracy.</p><p>And you are conflating science and the pursuit of data with the data itself.</p><p>At no point did I suggest a meritocracy or rule by scientists so arguing against that is pointless.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:11:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358801#post358801</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358801#post358801</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I tend to agree with Bart about this one, Matthew. </q></p><p>I tend to agree with Matthew about this one, Craig. But it's typically cross-purposed, since we can have both evidence based policy and a democracy at the same time, if the democratically elected leaders (and/or the underlying public that elected…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 10:24:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358800#post358800</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358800#post358800</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						So her oncologist wasn't well-enough informed to realise that Sativex would not do what she wanted? A system that relies on that group of practitioners for information won't work then. Imagine if there was a national health organisation that hired researchers and policy people ..
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 09:25:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358799#post358799</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358799#post358799</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It’s interesting, but the vibe is it was offered to the journalist because it makes the ministry look better.</q></p><p>I don't think anyone thought Helen Kelly wasn't at least aware of the political importance of her application. I got the feeling that the article somewhat overstated the political motivations.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 09:06:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358788#post358788</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358788#post358788</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/78587383/helen-kellys-medicinal-cannabis-application-was-driven-by-political-motives" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Background on the communications between the MoH and Helen Kelly's oncologist</a>.</p><p>It's interesting, but the vibe is it was offered to the journalist because it makes the ministry look better.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 18:48:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358787#post358787</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358787#post358787</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the fat, lazy, overpaid, underworked Wellington policy class</q></p><p>You really do need to find a new club to beat with.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 18:46:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358786#post358786</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358786#post358786</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>How can <strong>any clear thinking person</strong> have a problem with ‘evidence based public policy’ – which would obviously be based on ‘advice’ from those best equipped to give it.</q></p><p>I think the answer lies in your question ;-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 18:45:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358776#post358776</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358776#post358776</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>it’s all Greek to me…</strong><br /><q>We’re a democracy not a sciencocracy and the demos are entitled to be slow to reach conclusions</q><br />Well done on the neologism ‘sciencocracy’, I’m guessing you meant <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientocracy" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">scientocracy,</a> still a bit of  neologism itself, but I don’t think it means what you think it means,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 12:43:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358771#post358771</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358771#post358771</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>While CBD is in the Medicines Act, that only covers therapeutic use, not non-therapeutic use. I have written to the Ministry of Health seeking their confirmation this is the case.</q></p><p>Ah, interesting.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:21:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358763#post358763</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358763#post358763</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>nor would it even be desirable</q>…says someone who makes a career out of broadcasting opinion unconstrained by evidence!</p><p>If “the people” or their representatives are slow or irrational in their reactions to real-world problems, there must be real-world consequences from that; and it is the responsibility of a government to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 09:49:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358762#post358762</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358762#post358762</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>We're a democracy not a sciencocracy and the demos are entitled to be slow to reach conclusions &ndash; or even irrational &ndash; if they want to be.</q></p><p>Bollocks.</p><p>In the first place I never suggested a "sciencocracy" (sic) the word you are looking for is meritocracy where roles would be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 09:31:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358761#post358761</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358761#post358761</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I tend to agree with Bart about this one, Matthew. Evidence-based public policy and eventual legislation are the optimal way to proceed on many issues. It's why I support both medicinal cannabis and genetically modified crops.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 09:21:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew  Hooton</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358759#post358759</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358759#post358759</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>One day we’ll have evidence-based legislation</q></p><p> No we won't, and nor would it even be desirable.  We're a democracy not a sciencocracy and the demos are entitled to be slow to reach conclusions &ndash; or even irrational &ndash; if they want to be.  </p><p>It would be a good idea to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 09:05:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>chris fowlie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358757#post358757</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358757#post358757</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						"I thought it might be"? I said this last week, when I told you CBD is not a tetrahydrocannabinol and therefore not covered by the Misuse of Drugs Act's definition of a cannabis preparation. While CBD is in the Medicines Act, that only covers therapeutic use, not non-therapeutic use. I…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 08:36:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Brent Jackson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358755#post358755</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358755#post358755</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It seems especially the case here. This should be a one-time product approval by Medsafe. There’s no reason to make every use a matter of ministerial approval.</q></p><p>Damn straight!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 23:22:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358753#post358753</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358753#post358753</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>More thoughts from the Labour Party</p><p>“It’s about accepting there is enough medical evidence around now that under proper or appropriate supervision from a GP or specialist that this isn’t a form of treatment that ought to go through a series of hoops to get a ministerial sign-off.”</q></p><p>They've got…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 21:12:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hilary Stace</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358752#post358752</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358752#post358752</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						We used to have a New Zealand Guidelines Group, independent of the Ministry of Health, whose job was to assess international clinical evidence and produce authoritative best practice guidelines. This government removed its funding.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 20:58:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>tussock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358745#post358745</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358745#post358745</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Next thing they'll be using alcohol to clean our wounds, despite the inherent dangers of over-consumption! Won't someone think of the children!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 15:20:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358743#post358743</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358743#post358743</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>More thoughts from the <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=11617227" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Labour Party</a><br /><q>"It's about accepting there is enough medical evidence around now that under proper or appropriate supervision from a GP or specialist that this isn't a form of treatment that ought to go through a series of hoops to get a ministerial sign-off."</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 14:16:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358739#post358739</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358739#post358739</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Dunce’s position</q></p><p>spell check FTW :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 13:38:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358738#post358738</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358738#post358738</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						We still let them play with toy guns though :-)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 12:51:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ray Gilbert</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358737#post358737</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358737#post358737</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>0% alcohol beer contains 0% alcohol, but is not sold to minors</q></p><p>I don't have a problem with that. We banned lolly cigarettes for kids years ago, and we don't let them buy no nicotine herbal cigarettes that I know of.</p><p>Mind you the kids can buy and love  <a href="http://www.sainsburys.co.uk/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/gb/groceries/shandy-bass-330ml?langId=44&amp;storeId=10151&amp;krypto=lOKRjx2G4MdyTRE23hBK3SGR5O28XVK11atWENMVxzT2p6nQgiTDDCRuj7vNOIwAYLFd4xPJoAcmrgA4VtK8EX0YmyAfD7FlfzH0Qw1IsCcnNjRnVOKCB%2BbI2vYi76GBBpKPhB%2FIjjp1MEhsB%2Fkx6vJ%2BzpoHfeSX4MXfhjlOA%2FY%3D&amp;ddkey=http%3Agb%2Fgroceries%2Fshandy-bass-330ml" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Shandy Bass</a>…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 12:18:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358735#post358735</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358735#post358735</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>CBD is regulated under Medicines Act</q></p><p>I thought it might be. But the MoH page on medical cannabis doesn’t quote the Medicines Act, it quotes the Misuse of Drugs Act.</p><p>And the Medicines regulations list it as a “prescription medicine”. Am I right in seeing a dubious basis for making…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 11:41:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358734#post358734</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358734#post358734</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Meanwhile it’s sad that the bureaucrats are all so risk averse. It seems like everyone in the chain is completely paranoid about making any call. And that means the only person willing to make a decision is the minister who is extremely unlikely to have the depth of knowledge of…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 11:37:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358733#post358733</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358733#post358733</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Brewed ginger beer will contain small traces of alcohol, but is sold to minors. Correct? Analogous?</q></p><p>Off-topic but<br />Love the <a href="http://hakanoa-handmade.co.nz/shop/dry-ginger-beer-carton-of-24/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hakanoa Ginger beer</a> ~1% alcohol, I'm betting they don't even measure it.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 11:32:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ross Bell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358732#post358732</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358732#post358732</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>CBD is regulated under Medicines Act<br /><a href="http://www.legislation.govt.nz/regulation/public/1984/0143/latest/DLM96863.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.legislation.govt.nz/regulation/public/1984/0143/latest/DLM96863.html</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 11:32:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>st ephen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358730#post358730</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358730#post358730</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>One day we'll have evidence-based legislation</q><br />Nah &ndash; according to John Key, scientists are like lawyers &ndash; you can always find one who will give the counter-view.  So we're stuck with legislation-based evidence for the foreseeable future.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 10:34:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jeremy Andrew</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358729#post358729</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358729#post358729</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Brewed ginger beer will contain small traces of alcohol, but is sold to minors. Correct? Analogous?</q></p><p>0% alcohol beer contains 0% alcohol, but is not sold to minors (really, try to get it at Countdown if you look under age). Probably even more analogous.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 10:16:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Shaun Lott</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358728#post358728</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358728#post358728</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>One day we'll have evidence-based legislation, sigh.</q></p><p>I hope, but don't hold your breath. Whether or not you inhaled ;)</p><p>Brewed ginger beer will contain small traces of alcohol, but is sold to minors. Correct? Analogous?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 09:59:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358727#post358727</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358727#post358727</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>One day we'll have evidence-based legislation, sigh.</p><p>Meanwhile it's sad that the bureaucrats are all so risk averse. It seems like everyone in the chain is completely paranoid about making any call. And that means the only person willing to make a decision is the minister who is extremely unlikely…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 09:24:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358726#post358726</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-approved-by-lunchtime/?p=358726#post358726</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 09:24:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
