<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Discussion: Regarding Auckland</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=134198#post134198</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=134198#post134198</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Interesting article, thanks Sacha. Reading that, and also going back to <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/sunday-star-times/business/2327720/Rod-Oram-Welcome-to-grater-Auckland" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rod Oram's article</a> from April, I can't help but be utterly outraged at the callous disregard for the Commission's considered suggestions that has been put on display by Rodney and his band of merry men. He really is the…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:35:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=134131#post134131</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=134131#post134131</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>This is worth a bump. Te DomPost <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/national/2925552/When-Auckland-thinks-big-the-rest-think-hard" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">casts an eye</a> northwards and considers whether Auckland's amalgamation is likely to be duplicated in Wellington and Hawkes Bay. Has some revealing quotes.  </p><p>One candidate being perhaps too frank about his campaign strategy:</p><blockquote><p>Uptown, Auckland Mayor John Banks, a former police minister and…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 12:11:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109835#post109835</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109835#post109835</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>What is happening in the house today is a demonstration of just how strong our democracy is. Despite the fact that NACT has a majority in the house does not mean they can "Railroad" through any legislation they chose on a whim, they cannot.</p></blockquote><p>I was busy over the weekend,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:08:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109657#post109657</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109657#post109657</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Initial reports from the people who tried it are pretty tepid, it has to be said. Very keen to try it myself.</blockquote> Sounds like the beginnings of an excellent tool, I'll tell you that for nothing.:)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 21:58:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109655#post109655</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109655#post109655</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Initial reports from the people who tried it are pretty tepid, it has to be said. Very keen to try it myself.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 20:43:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Knowledge Bro</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109651#post109651</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109651#post109651</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>It is with great regret that I have to inform you that I have been made redundant. <br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eC14GonZnU&amp;feature=PlayList&amp;p=15890392A174D505&amp;playnext=1&amp;playnext_from=PL&amp;index=27 " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> This</a> is where it all began.<br />May I ntroduce to you the real Knowledge Bro and his <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TIOH80Qg7Q " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> Web Interface.</a><br />Coming to a screen near you on Tuesday if all goes…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 19:13:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Caleb D&#039;Anvers</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109650#post109650</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109650#post109650</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Oh, and as I said Labour and the Greens are perfectly entitled to waste as much time as they can filibustering with meaningless amendments.</p></blockquote><p>Right, so paid parental leave and preventing the stealth-privatization of Auckland's assets are 'meaningless' pieces of filibustering, then? Always nice to know where you stand on…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 19:02:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109649#post109649</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109649#post109649</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>or Sophie. OK with you?</p></blockquote><p>$27000,000,000 +4 rich white men + Rodney Hide's permission= Carte Blanche to take whatever they like.<br />OK with you?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 18:56:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109643#post109643</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109643#post109643</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Oh, and as I said Labour and the Greens are perfectly entitled to waste as much time as they can filibustering with meaningless amendments.  Just as ACT and National did over the Employment Relations Bill.  Please demonstrate what tangible improvements they've made to the bill and I'll die happy.</p><p>But…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 17:10:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109642#post109642</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109642#post109642</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Steve:  Believe me (or not) far from there being some nefarious plot to stitch up Epsom for Rodney, you can still hear the plaintive wailing of dessicated ACT-oids that he faced any competition at all.</p><p>The usual process where the candidate with the most votes won was otherwise in play.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 17:07:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109630#post109630</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109630#post109630</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						So, Craig. Still suffering from that blocked up head full of cotton wool feeling then? Perhaps you should consult a Doctor. Oh, that's right, you don't consider consultation to be important.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 15:35:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109629#post109629</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109629#post109629</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Go sit in the corner, sip your fuckupachino and go through you grieving process where I don't have to see or listen to you.</blockquote> Just like Hide effectively said to Labour when trying to suggest a serious concern this morning (Marian Street, Hansard, in case you think it made up).…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 15:32:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109626#post109626</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109626#post109626</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Craig's right Madam, Democracy is wasted on the ignorant masses. People like those that live in Epsom have proved beyond any shadow of a doubt that important decisions should not be left to them. They must have all their assets handed over to Rodney and his mates immediately.</p></blockquote><p>Steve:  I'm…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 15:19:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109624#post109624</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109624#post109624</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>What's a crock, Steve, is that Labour may be perfectly entitled to filibuster their arses off (as National and ACT did with the Employment Relations Act) but please spare me the bullshit about the grand triumph of democracy. Where, it seems, making shit up is an essential part of democracy.</blockquote>…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 15:04:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109622#post109622</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109622#post109622</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>For any that believe that Labour and their allies are "Wasting tax payers money' may I point out that this analysis relies on the misguided belief that this country should be run for the profit of the few and all aspects of governance should adhere to strict accounting principles, this…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 14:53:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109620#post109620</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109620#post109620</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Somebody may have mentioned this but there is some great real time blogging from the House going on by the Labour MPs on their new red alert blog. </blockquote> Moana Mackey just plugged the blog in the House
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 14:47:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hilary Stace</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109618#post109618</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109618#post109618</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Somebody may have mentioned this but there is some great real time blogging from the House going on by the Labour MPs on their new <a href="http://blog.labour.org.nz/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">red alert blog</a>. Phil Twyford has just blogged about the potential privatisation of Auckland's assets as a result of this legislation.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 14:26:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109616#post109616</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=109616#post109616</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>What is happening in the house today is a demonstration of just how strong our democracy is. Despite the fact that NACT has a majority in the house does not mean they can "Railroad" through any legislation they chose on a whim, they cannot.<br />For any that believe that Labour…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 13:20:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=108235#post108235</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=108235#post108235</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Worth reminding ourselves too that the Commission only recommended Councillors elected at large to balance the parochial influence of the six large Councils &ndash; which would have been required to implement strong community engagement in the absence of Communty Boards. </p><p>With Hide substituting weakened Local Boards, there's no justification for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 23:14:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joshua Arbury</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=108233#post108233</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=108233#post108233</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Maybe Rodney Hide never bothered to read through to recommendation 27 in the executive summary of the Commission's report:</p><blockquote><p>27. At the same time, the Commission was concerned not to create an organisational monolith, unconnected to the people it serves. With this in mind, the Commission considered carefully a number…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 22:39:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Christopher Dempsey</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107703#post107703</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107703#post107703</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Yes, Simon. I object to the thought of sharing a city with a patronising slab of cock cheese like Joseph Barratt too. Could we force Parnell to become sort of like the Vatican City?</p></blockquote><p>I'm mystified by this comment. The point is...?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 16:31:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107702#post107702</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107702#post107702</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The cockies are being included as collateral to support the Banks-O-Mander. </p><p>Should all else fail and a credible left-wing candidate gain some momentum, their votes will be there to get the ACT candidate elected. Whether they want their paddock to be part of the Greater City is of no consequence…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 16:23:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107671#post107671</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107671#post107671</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Summary: JAFA reporter goes south, meets the hicks from the sticks who will be included in the Super City (Pokeno, Mercer etc), gets an earful. They're not happy. The tone is light but the message is clear.</p></blockquote><p>Yes, Simon.  I object to the thought of sharing a city with a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 14:28:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>simon g</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107670#post107670</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107670#post107670</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>More from the Aucklander (Herald's Thursday supplement):</p><p><a href="http://www.theaucklander.co.nz/story.cfm?storyID=3797594" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.theaucklander.co.nz/story.cfm?storyID=3797594</a></p><p>Summary: JAFA reporter goes south, meets the hicks from the sticks who will be included in the Super City (Pokeno, Mercer etc), gets an earful. They're not happy. The tone is light but the message is clear.</p><p>The only surprise is that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 14:22:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107587#post107587</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107587#post107587</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>"each ratepayer will pay at least $550 in restructuring costs for the Super City"</p></blockquote><p>You could almost get a new stadium for that!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 10:50:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107574#post107574</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107574#post107574</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I think the wider point, Craig, is that at least the $550 is based on something well thought through.</p></blockquote><p>No, Sasha, the widest point is that pulling numbers out of your arse is bad, m'kay &mdash; even if you happen to agree with the people doing it.  And the Commission…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 09:45:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107546#post107546</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107546#post107546</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I think the wider point, Craig, is that at least the $550 is based on something well thought through. Hide and co are blustering on without any idea &ndash; other than that the cost will be met by Auckland's ratepayers. </p><p>It's not a stretch to say that's likely to be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 23:57:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107544#post107544</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107544#post107544</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Good score for Labour's new Auckland-issues man Phil Twyford, though.</p></blockquote><p>Meh... one might think, however, Twyford et. al. might want to be a little careful with the "each ratepayer will pay at least $550 in restructuring costs for the Super City" line, when I think it's based on a crude…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 23:50:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107450#post107450</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107450#post107450</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Whilst I tend to regard knee-jerk reactions to communications expenditure with suspicions, I'm a bit staggered by the <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10570869" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">$553,000 spent  by the government in a month on super-city publicity</a>.</p><p>These things don't come for free, but that's a hell of a lot of money to be thrown at publicising proposals made…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 15:42:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107447#post107447</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107447#post107447</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Any thoughts on merits/chances of full ward representation for the 20 new Councillors, Craig?</p></blockquote><p>I think the merits are considerable &mdash; which probably means its not going to happen. :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 15:34:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107446#post107446</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107446#post107446</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I have listened carefully to Rodney Hide today, talking <a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA0905/S00116.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">about his answer yesterday</a> to the question "Has he costed the Government’s super-city proposal outlined in Making Auckland Greater: The Government’s decisions on Auckland Governance; if not, why not?"</p><p>He answered "Yes".</p><p>Today Rodney was eventually, under something rather like duress…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 15:31:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107390#post107390</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107390#post107390</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yes, I did notice them having a buck each way with the editorial position. Just not keeping up with posting this thread as things develop. </p><p>Any thoughts on merits/chances of full ward representation for the 20 new Councillors, Craig?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 12:24:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107322#post107322</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107322#post107322</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And sorry for sounding like a broken record about this, but I do have to note the very bitter irony that APN and Fairfax apparently give a shit about local body "democracy".  The increasingly thin and superficial coverage of local bodies suggested the opposite to me.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 02:31:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107321#post107321</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107321#post107321</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Eh? I fixed the link Max provided and made no comment about the article at all. Sure you're not thinking of someone else?</p></blockquote><p>Probably am, sorry.  But I find it rather amusing that when one arm of APN goes into editorial crusader mode (regarding the EFA) its the end of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 02:29:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107316#post107316</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107316#post107316</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Eh? I fixed the link Max provided and made no comment about the article at all. Sure you're not thinking of someone else?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 00:34:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107315#post107315</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107315#post107315</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Sacha:</p><p>Ah, so APN running biased and hysterical editorial campaigns isn't quite so bad now...  </p><p>And, Tom: Serious question, but do you have links to this wonderful Reid poll &mdash; you know, things like the sample size, the questions that were actually asked etc.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 00:14:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107301#post107301</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107301#post107301</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>De-munged link:<br /><a href="http://www.theaucklander.co.nz/news/story.cfm?storyID=3797679" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.theaucklander.co.nz/news/story.cfm?storyID=3797679</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 21:01:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107299#post107299</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107299#post107299</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						All bar one of the results of Reid poll mentioned in The Aucklander was ignored by the Herald. Interestingly, the only part of the Reid poll mentioned by the Herald &ndash; the even split in opinions on the Maori seats &ndash; was in a story that was used to reinforce…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 20:52:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Max Call</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107292#post107292</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107292#post107292</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>also see this from 'The Aucklander News'</p><p><a href="http://www.theaucklander.co.nz/news/story.cfm?storyID=3797679/AUCKLANDERS STAND UP TO GOVT BULLDOZER<br />Aucklanders are giving two fingers to the Government&#039;s bulldozer tactics over the super-city.">http://www.theaucklander.co.nz/news/story.cfm?storyID=3797679/AUCKLANDERS STAND UP TO GOVT BULLDOZER<br />Aucklanders are giving two fingers to the Government's bulldozer tactics over the super-city.</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 20:18:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107227#post107227</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107227#post107227</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>"John Banks is a cunt" isn't really one of them.</blockquote>I'll vote for that. :)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 13:59:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107195#post107195</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107195#post107195</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>There's something happening here, what it is ain't exactly clear ...</p></blockquote><p>Well, I've had a rather disturbing conversation with my next door neighbour where "it" appears to be a certain North Shore councillor, well... serving up porkie pies.  Hell, I'd be scared and angry too if I thought the person…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 11:46:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>simon g</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107192#post107192</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107192#post107192</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Here's more evidence of widespread concern about this issue, not on Planet Pundit but out where the real folks live:</p><p><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/auckland/local-news/papakura-courier/2386378/Questions-over-supercity" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.stuff.co.nz/auckland/local-news/papakura-courier/2386378/Questions-over-supercity</a></p><p>Hundreds of people turning up to public meetings on local government? There's something happening here, what it is ain't exactly clear ...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 11:18:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107164#post107164</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=107164#post107164</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/PB/Business/QOA/8/7/c/49HansQ_20090505_00000063-1-Auckland-Local-Government-Reform-Consultation.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The plot thickens...</a></p><p>(<a href="http://www.thestandard.org.nz/goff-decks-key-over-supercity/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hat-tip</a> to The Standard.)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 00:50:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=106678#post106678</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=106678#post106678</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						After the byelection.  :)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 22:12:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joshua Arbury</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=106675#post106675</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=106675#post106675</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						When will we find out more about the Waterview Connection? Supposedly an alternative went to Steven Joyce earlier in the week.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 21:48:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=105641#post105641</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=105641#post105641</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Rose-tinted analysis from Ralston, who may be remembering which side his toast is buttered on.</p></blockquote><p>Yeah, Sasha... and what does APN's illimitable appetite for rubbish have to do with anything?  Still, I do hope someone who actually matters in Labour is listening to the man &mdash; if all you've got…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:40:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=105551#post105551</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=105551#post105551</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>He does concede that "National's pull back from the Waterview tunnel project will not help it."</blockquote> Doesn't mean I like his writing. :)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:50:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=105529#post105529</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=105529#post105529</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Rose-tinted analysis <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&amp;objectid=10568673&amp;pnum=0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">from Ralston</a>, who may be remembering which side his toast is buttered on. The Nats have nothing to lose, he claims:</p><blockquote><p>Some who voted Labour might now feel that National has not turned out to be as bad as they expected and either withhold their vote or actively support…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:19:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=105525#post105525</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=105525#post105525</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>On the subject of the 'Rich &amp; Powerful" running Auckland.<br />Bill Ralston, everybody's favorite political commentator, had this to say about who can afford to win the Mt Albert by-election.</p><blockquote><p>National has the advantage of being in government and can therefore summon up money from business contributors who want to curry…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:09:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=105507#post105507</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=105507#post105507</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						What Craig said, to a large extent. The people making these decisions are sincere in their beliefs, including how it is right to conduct the process. I would however caution that those beliefs are not necessarily what we hear from them through public channels.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 21:53:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=105505#post105505</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=105505#post105505</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Of course, it could just be a bit of paranoid conspiracy-theorising on my part, but it is intermittently giving my sphincter the spasms. What do you reckon?</p></blockquote><p>It is anywhere in your conceptual framework that people you disagree with can hold their views in good faith and without some nefarious…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 21:36:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=105477#post105477</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=105477#post105477</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I recommend reading <a href="http://www.waitakere.govt.nz/WhaHap/nm/mr/2009/apr09.asp#whatswrongwithakl" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the views</a> of long-serving councillor and ex-Mayor of the Glen Eden borough council, Janet Clews, informed by the lessons of that previous round of amalgamations in the late 1980s. (Note that a slightly edited <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&amp;objectid=10567609&amp;pnum=0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">version</a> of this appeared last week in the Herald):</p><blockquote><p>It is critical that the…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 15:42:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=105475#post105475</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=105475#post105475</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>In a <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&amp;objectid=10567613&amp;pnum=0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">recent column</a>, local government law specialist Associate Professor Kenneth Palmer likes the Government's proposed changes:</p><blockquote><p>Finally we have a workable prescription for Auckland to speak with one voice and act boldly in the regional and national interest.<br />...<br />The voice of the communities will still be heard through the…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 15:40:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=105467#post105467</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=105467#post105467</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Stewart, while the current circling of vultures is unattractive and there's definitely a power grab in the offing, they didn't set up the Commission process. Concern by Auckland's business interests and the politicians of the right goes back a decade and more, so it's hardly surprising to see that translated…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:53:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Roger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=104625#post104625</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=104625#post104625</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>As for “rich”; well if you run any organisation, you’re usually in charge of its finances and it would be a pious hope to suppose that you’d vote yourself a pittance in salary and perks.</p></blockquote><p>It is not the Mayoral or councillor salary that is at issue here... that is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:15:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=104621#post104621</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=104621#post104621</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I hope I'm wrong, but I have developed a suspicion that the whole shebang is gearing up to be a chance for ACT (political party) to reinvent itself and, as a side-effect, make most Aucklanders' lives a little worse.</p><p>Seeing as the nationwide ACT vote fell apart at the last…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:25:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hilary Stace</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=104619#post104619</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=104619#post104619</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The new mayor of Auckland will probably be the person the Herald anoints.</p><p>The way elections work, particularly when the voting population is large and geographically spread is that those with the highest name recognition tend to get elected. That means those that are already powerful with media contacts so…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:23:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Bell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=104617#post104617</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=104617#post104617</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>John Banks is criticised on NatRad this morning for not objecting to the “supercity” plan that will probably give him an even more highly-paid job than the one he has now. We don’t want this city to be run by the rich and powerful, say objectors. </p><p>What? The powerful run…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 08:39:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=104612#post104612</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=104612#post104612</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I commend this <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&amp;objectid=10567438&amp;pnum=0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">thoughtful articulation</a> of Maori history and interest in Auckland's governance by local academic research director Merata Kawharu.</p><blockquote><p>Crucially, from Ngati Whatua's perspective, by Hobson accepting their offer, he was also accepting the obligations inherent in the offer. Translated, this meant that Ngati Whatua believed they were not giving…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 08:12:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hilary Stace</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103497#post103497</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103497#post103497</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Sorry I couldn't find an internet link to this notice (below) so just cut and pasted. Wellington people might be interested in this public talk by David Shand who was a member of the Royal Commission on Auckland &ndash; on Friday 17th, 12.30 (lecture theatre is behind the law school).…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:18:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103465#post103465</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103465#post103465</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'd say greed and powerlust may be closer..
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:31:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sam F</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103464#post103464</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103464#post103464</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Jury's out on loathing, though.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:30:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103460#post103460</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103460#post103460</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I mean the motivation is less likely to be fear.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:23:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Roger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103449#post103449</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103449#post103449</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Is that a good thing?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:07:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103439#post103439</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103439#post103439</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						At least the current crop seem more.. ambitous.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:43:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Roger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103436#post103436</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103436#post103436</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						There is a potentially apocryphal story that when Minister Cooper was chopping up the ARC in 1991 he was challenged that the continuous restructuring of Auckland was hindering it from getting its act together... he is reputed to have replied... "Are you stupid?  That's the point!"
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:41:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103435#post103435</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103435#post103435</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>In current Mayoral news, <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10566668" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bernard Orsman reports</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Mr Banks yesterday said he was quietly confident a sound and sensible proposal could be found to convince the Government to strengthen grassroots democracy before legislation was introduced to Parliament.</p><p>"What we can't do is to try and reinvent the wheel that was in…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:37:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103434#post103434</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103434#post103434</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&amp;objectid=10566587&amp;pnum=0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rudman's story</a> also outlines some of the tussling over the years featuring current Mayors in leading roles.  The ex-Mayor of bustling metropolis Queenstown even gets a mention:</p><blockquote><p>It's forgotten now, but if we'd stuck with the model the Local Government Commission proposed in 1989 we mightn't be going through the current…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:30:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Roger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103410#post103410</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103410#post103410</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>From the Herald 15/4/09:</strong></p><blockquote><p>What's clear is that in the current struggle for control of Tamaki Makaurau, what's in the best interests of big business, or central government or the soon-to-be-dispossessed mayors, is not necessarily going to benefit the rest of us.</p><p>At the risk of repeating myself, Auckland's 1.4…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:03:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Roger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103218#post103218</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103218#post103218</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>...we'd get a pointless celebrity overseeing an incredibly complex transition of governance and operational capability and SuperAuckland would be wrecked from the start.</p></blockquote><p>I think that there is a high probability of that.  The race (and the ticket of councillors that you would need to actually make the Mayoralty worth…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:19:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Harris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103205#post103205</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103205#post103205</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>No, Russell, but we might actually need to have a discussion about why you shouldn't reward infantile acting-out with attention.</p></blockquote><p>But- but- then we'd never hear from you at all, Craig! And that would be bad.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:43:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ScottY</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103193#post103193</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103193#post103193</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Banks spent much of the first part of his term telling us he had changed, and that we would see a kinder and gentler side to the man.</p><p>The supercity debate has shown that Banks hasn't changed one bit. Thankfully his disguise has melted in a very public manner.</p><p>I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:01:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103189#post103189</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103189#post103189</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Re the rush to implement, I must admit my worst case scenario is the FPP at-large SuperMayor elections sees a Holmes or similar (shudder) voted in.  So we'd get a pointless celebrity overseeing an incredibly complex transition of governance and operational capability and SuperAuckland would be wrecked from the start.…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:46:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103186#post103186</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103186#post103186</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Are we going to have the lefty-bloggers-are-just-as-bad-the-right debate again?</p></blockquote><p>No, Russell, but we might actually need to have a discussion about why you shouldn't reward infantile acting-out with attention.  But perhaps everyone gets what they need out of it, so who am I to complain.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:55:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103178#post103178</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103178#post103178</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Hey, I'm not claiming sainthood for anyone in this situation &ndash; but Craig if you can't see what I wrote in that clip then I welcome you to tell us all your analysis of it.  </p><p>Was Rodney all a-quiver and inviting suggestions?  Didn't think so.  Were Harvey and Williams piling…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:58:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103176#post103176</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103176#post103176</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>If by 'docile', you mean I'm not interested into buying into the mututally parasitic circle jerk of self-righteousness some sections of the left have with Master Slater, guilty as charged.</p></blockquote><p>Are we going to have the lefty-bloggers-are-just-as-bad-the-right debate again?</p><p>Slater is an ass, and an unpleasant and frequently misogynist one.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:45:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103174#post103174</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103174#post103174</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Never one to let us down, Sainsbury fans the flames in a 9 minute studio piece with Bob Harvey and Andrew Williams valiantly trying to move on and Rodney Hide playing he who has already decided.</p></blockquote><p>You're taking the piss, right?  Please.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:32:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103163#post103163</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103163#post103163</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Oh, and Williams waved the Oram SST story, which I sincerely hope Hide reads.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 21:55:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103162#post103162</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103162#post103162</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Never one to let us down, Sainsbury fans the flames in a 9 minute <a href="http://tvnz.co.nz/close-up/super-city-squabble-2639729/video" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">studio piece</a> with Bob Harvey and Andrew Williams valiantly trying to move on and Rodney Hide playing he who has already decided.  Still, at least they'll all be round the same table on Thursday, it seems.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 21:54:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103147#post103147</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103147#post103147</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Remember when <a href="http://www.nznews.net.nz/hardnews/2002/20020531.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jeanette called for a Royal Commission on genetic engineering</a>, and when the conclusions didn't suit her, she rather churlishly disowned it.</p><p>Mr Hide comes across as about to repeat the same mistake with Greater Auckland. If it ultimately ends up in a 'Community Charge', we all know the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:21:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Harris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103145#post103145</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103145#post103145</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Craig, I don't think any of us would characterize you as docile.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:51:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103142#post103142</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103142#post103142</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>What a docile bunch we are.</p><p>Imagine these stories: "Mayor of London / New York works hand-in-glove with a blog from the depths of the sewer." Imagine the response.</p></blockquote><p>Simon:</p><p>If by 'docile', you mean I'm not interested into buying into the mututally parasitic circle jerk of self-righteousness some sections…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:33:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Harris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103139#post103139</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103139#post103139</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>unless it actually proves impossible to implement.</p></blockquote><p>Well, part of me wonders if this isn't Key's way of keeping Rodney all tied up and too busy to cause trouble. Also, without Rodney around to muzzle him, David Garrett has a free reign, as Heather Roy does not seem up to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:29:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Roger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103129#post103129</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103129#post103129</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Sacha...</p><p><em>NZ Herald 13/04/09</em></p><blockquote><p>Mr Hide said the mayors would be able influence the detail of the Government's plans before legislation went to Parliament, but no change would be made to plans for one council, one mayor and 20 to 30 local boards.</p></blockquote><p><em>NZ Herald 11/04/09</em></p><blockquote><p>"Aucklanders can be assured…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:29:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103101#post103101</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103101#post103101</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						So others don't have to..
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:42:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Harris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103093#post103093</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103093#post103093</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Why do you even look?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:10:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103090#post103090</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103090#post103090</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Farrar <a href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/04/if_ever_one_needed_proof_of_why_auckland_needs_reforming.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">notes</a> "It was hardly a difficult guess that Whale would be responding to Mayor Williams latest outburst."<br />In any case, let's not get diverted by the sideshow.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:56:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>simon g</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103089#post103089</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103089#post103089</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>What a docile bunch we are.</p><p>Imagine these stories: "Mayor of London / New York works hand-in-glove with a blog from the depths of the sewer." Imagine the response.</p><p>But, hey, it's Auckland, it's just good old Banksie. And it's a long weekend. We're having a nap.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:49:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>dc_red</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103081#post103081</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103081#post103081</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>@ Mikaere</p><blockquote><p>* While our society is multiethnic, our governance institutions are rooted in a monoculture (that of Britain). Representatives from different ethnic backgrounds does not change the structures, so does not equate to multiculturalism</p></blockquote><p>Such assertions may come as a surprise to the Scots and the Welsh.</p><div class="hr"><hr /></div><p>I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:29:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103076#post103076</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103076#post103076</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And both necks such a fetching shade of red, Mark.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:09:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103075#post103075</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103075#post103075</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Roger, any links for that from Hide?  It fits with others dismissing calls for them to meekly "submit" to a select committee provcess with little prospect of success.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:09:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Harris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103073#post103073</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103073#post103073</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>why should anyone need to remind such an overpaid journo of that?</p></blockquote><p>Methinks you give him too much credit, calling him a journo.</p><p>The real reason he likes Hide is that they can gaze into eachother's eyes without getting a stiff neck  ;-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:40:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Roger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103070#post103070</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103070#post103070</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yes Sacha, but I doubt that it will make any difference with Hide saying that the desision is now government policy and while he is happy to talk nothing will change.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:36:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103067#post103067</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103067#post103067</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Ta, Roger. Oram's analysis about the fundamental differences between what the Commission proposed and what the Government has countered with is spot on and <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/sunday-star-times/business/2327720/Rod-Oram-Welcome-to-grater-Auckland" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">well worth a read</a>.</p><blockquote><p>Thus the local councils would be a new type of representative body, one which operates within a larger local authority and which…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:20:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Roger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103065#post103065</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103065#post103065</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Rod Oram on the Super City (SST)</strong></p><blockquote><p>To understand how bad the government's decisions on Auckland's governance are, you need to understand how comprehensively they destroy the proposals made by the Royal Commission.</p></blockquote><p>Well at least someone in the media is paying attention and actually reading the reports!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:55:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103061#post103061</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103061#post103061</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Rodney Hide is trash-talking the North Shore mayor.</p></blockquote><p>Sigh... So, now Rodney shouldn't defend himself when he's called a liar?  And, darling, if anything in that story you linked to is "trash talking", I've got one question: When the hell did you become so delicate? You've sure taken extremely strong…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:11:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103060#post103060</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103060#post103060</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Ah, <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10566362&amp;pnum=0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">yes</a>.  Lid lifted on some of the personality politics.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 08:55:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JLM</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103059#post103059</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103059#post103059</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Well, that didn't work. Try</p><p><a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10566362" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10566362</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 08:22:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JLM</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103058#post103058</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103058#post103058</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						[http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10566362|Fun times ahead], by the looks of the Herald this morning.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 08:21:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103046#post103046</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103046#post103046</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Indeed, where to start. What a compendium of breathless blathering. And get that man some knee pads.</p><blockquote><p>liable to capture by odd people, agenda people, high-and-mighty people, people who seemed to answer to no particular constituency, people too happy with our dough.</p></blockquote><p>Sound like anyone we know?</p><blockquote><p>Strangely, there is…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 22:37:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ScottY</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103034#post103034</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=103034#post103034</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10566208" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Paul Holmes on the Supercity</a>:</p><blockquote><p>The Supercity will happen. That is that. It was delivered with the clarity we have come to expect from Rodney Hide and the light touch we are coming to see as the John Key trademark. No horses were frightened. The reformation is the most natural, normal…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 20:20:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102984#post102984</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102984#post102984</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>It appears that Mr Hide talked to at least some of them. Thus far there is no evidence that he actually listened to them however.</p><p>Grrrr. They're stealing my Manukau, to be subsumed as the southern suburbs and not much else. </p><p>Given who has been involved and cheerleading so far,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 12:43:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102950#post102950</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102950#post102950</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Here's <a href="http://scoop.co.nz/stories/AK0904/S00165.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the original release</a> from North Shore City Mayor, Andrew Williams.</p><blockquote><p>“National Party people with long-time North Shore allegiances have commented to me of their concerns that the government is being hi-jacked by Rodney Hide on this Auckland Governance issue. There are real concerns out there on the North Shore,…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 19:10:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102942#post102942</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102942#post102942</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Rodney vs Every Mayor But Banks is shaping up as ye olde clusterfuck.</p></blockquote><p>Like the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/march/31/newsid_2530000/2530803.stm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Thatcher vs Greater London Council clusterfuck</a>?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 17:38:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102937#post102937</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102937#post102937</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Haste is good? Clarity takes time. One suspects this editorial may have been written by committee.</p></blockquote><p>Or by John Roughan. He can sometimes give that impression all on his own.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:13:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102936#post102936</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102936#post102936</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Here we go.</p><p>Rodney Hide is trash-talking the North Shore mayor. See:</p><p><a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10566198" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hide rejects accusation he misled John Key over super city</a>.</p><p>Rodney vs Every Mayor But Banks is shaping up as ye olde clusterfuck.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:11:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102915#post102915</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102915#post102915</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>do you really think anything is going to satisfy the likes of Penny Bright or Hone Harawira?</p></blockquote><p>Nothing but a socialist revolution would satisfy Penny Bright. Even then I think she'd be getting thrown out of meetings and being sent to the gulag. Harawira on the other hand strikes me…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 13:17:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102914#post102914</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102914#post102914</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Today's <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&amp;objectid=10566120" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Herald editorial</a> addresses the governance issues and seems to strive for "balance". Corporate cheerleaders may be unamused.</p><blockquote><p>The Government's refinement of the royal commission's design for Auckland is nearly right, but not quite. The single city overlaying 20 to 30 community boards looks a better balance of power and local…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:57:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102899#post102899</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102899#post102899</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>the installation of John Banks as our new insect overlord</p></blockquote><p>His recent performances on RNZ have only firmed my belief that John is not fated to be the uberlord. Still, I'll work with whatever is delivered by our pollies and fellow citizens.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:19:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102896#post102896</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102896#post102896</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'm actually pretty agnostic about the whole idea, and there's sensible arguments (under a thick crust of bullshit) on all sides of this one. I'd rather see things done right, than right now...</p></blockquote><p>I believe we agree, then &ndash; including about the likelihood of ever satisfying some folk.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:11:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102893#post102893</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102893#post102893</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Both those responses and your desire to be rid of them swiftly make sense to me, given political differences.</p></blockquote><p>Oh, I don't think that's really fair, Sacha.  I'm actually pretty agnostic about the whole idea, and there's sensible arguments (under a thick crust of bullshit) on all sides of this…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:05:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102887#post102887</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102887#post102887</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://www.pundit.co.nz/content/super-city-or-super-mess" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">David Beatson</a> takes an historical view.</p><blockquote><p>The latest plan for change looks a little like Auckland the way it was supposed to be in 1963. Then, the country’s first Regional Authority was established to provide a uniting umbrella over some 29 territorial local authorities in Auckland.</p><p>By 1985, Labour’s new…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 22:36:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102884#post102884</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102884#post102884</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Craig, I believe John was mainly referring to merging operational systems, and taking enough time to allow picking the best across the current organisations.  It's proven to be a complex undertaking.</p><p>That has nothing to do with current political reactions, including leaders feeling disempowered and threatening to take on the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 22:23:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102881#post102881</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102881#post102881</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Nor do I think compulsory voting has exactly done wonders for the depth and breadth of representation in Canberra.</p></blockquote><p>Compulsory voting was certainly a factor in the rise of Pauline Hanson. Taking the opportunity to give a plague-on-both-of-your-houses finger to a self-absorbed dual party system that largely treated non-party members…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:42:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102880#post102880</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102880#post102880</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>John Holley wrote:</p><blockquote><p>Power in Auckland will be held by only a handful of people who, if a FPP electoral system is used, could well have a "mandate for change" with around 35% of the vote.</p></blockquote><p>Welll... yeeees.  But that's somewhat beside the point.  For all the hand-wringing about turnouts…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:25:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102879#post102879</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102879#post102879</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Craig, you're confusing operational and governance systems.</p></blockquote><p>Perhaps I am &mdash; but if people are going to act like children, I will treat them as such.  That generally involves not being interested in their opinion unless I'm buying them school shoes.  </p><p>And the moment Bob Harvey is saying he's going…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:16:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102878#post102878</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102878#post102878</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Te Runanga o Ngati Whatua Chair, Naida Glavish in <a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO0904/S00094.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">media release</a> yesterday:</p><blockquote><p>“Local government representation is just one small part of ensuring a true partnership and voice for mana whenua in the region. We must develop robust structures for partnership that enable meaningful input to all decision making across the…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:16:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102874#post102874</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102874#post102874</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Craig, you're confusing operational and governance systems.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:34:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102873#post102873</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102873#post102873</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Craig... that is a very unkind thing to say about the leader of your community!</p></blockquote><p>Its rather unkind of Mr. Williams to display an apparent inability to open his mouth and show that he's not functionally brain dead.Perhaps its a good thing the media has pretty much given up taking…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:27:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102872#post102872</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102872#post102872</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Oh, Te Standard makes the same point.</p></blockquote><p>And it is a very sound one. They bother me as much as any other group of righteous ideologues.</p><p>Even leaving aside Jennings' participation in such a rotten economic phenomenon as the Russian oligarchy, his pronouncements seem banal to me. It really is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:36:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102867#post102867</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102867#post102867</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Oh, Te Standard makes the <a href="http://www.thestandard.org.nz/russian-oligarch-urges-dump-mmp/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">same point</a>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:53:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102866#post102866</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102866#post102866</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/2321034/Dump-MMP-Jennings-urges" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jenni McManus reports</a> roundtable guest Stephen Jennings declaring that MMP should be dumped because it interferes with decisiveness.</p><blockquote><p>We need political leaders who can lead and manage change. "They need to be able to make policy choices quickly and efficiently," Jennings says. "We know what kind of political behaviour our…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:51:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102857#post102857</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102857#post102857</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Oh, and the Herald has a few minutes of <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/video.cfm?c_id=1&amp;gal_objectid=10565730&amp;gallery_id=105165" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">streaming video</a> of Key talking about Maori representation and why an advisory board is better than dedicated seats.  Think it's the same as that earlier audio clip, but better quality (and with body language).
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:00:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102856#post102856</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102856#post102856</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Admittedly, that was a generous interpretation on my part.</p><p>Wonder what corporate governance representatives like the <a href="http://www.iod.org.nz/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Institute of Directors</a> make of this?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:54:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Harris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102853#post102853</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102853#post102853</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Myself, I believe that Key, Hide and others simply do not understand governance and citizenship.</p></blockquote><p>I disagree. I think they understand them perfectly well. They just don't like them because they get in the way.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:47:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102850#post102850</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102850#post102850</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Meanwhile in totally unrelated news, <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/oddstuff/2327850/Tofu-licence-plate-ruled-too-rude" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">foo is misconstrued</a>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:45:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102849#post102849</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102849#post102849</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Myself, I believe that Key, Hide and others simply do not understand governance and citizenship.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:41:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102848#post102848</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102848#post102848</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>the Government has chosen to ignore the recommendation for a 4 year transition and, with no real rationale as to why, gone for a 18 month transition.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&amp;objectid=10565752&amp;pnum=0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Fran O'Sullivan thinks</a> the urgency is related to the Rugby World Cup. That might explain the tilting of the balance in favour of central…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:39:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jackie Clark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102830#post102830</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102830#post102830</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>That Jackie was Hyde's argument... 'three Maori councillors would be tokenistic, so let's have none, but we may allow them to have a little advisory committee that we can ignore'.</blockquote> I'm agreeing with you Roger. What I was saying was that I don't see the need for representatives of  <em>other</em>…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:12:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hay</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102827#post102827</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102827#post102827</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Does anybody remember the "Stronger Auckland" project?</p><p>There's a residual mention of it <a href="http://www.aucklandcity.govt.nz/council/projects/strongerauckland/default.asp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">on the Auckland City Council website</a>, but the primary website itself has quietly disappeared.</p><p>This was back in 2006-07, when the Labour government gave the city councils of the Auckland region an opportunity to sort things out…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:02:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Holley</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102826#post102826</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102826#post102826</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Firstly, I work for the ARC &ndash; and I know my job will go &ndash; I always expected it to.</p><p>I fully  support the concept of significant positive change in Auckland Governance &ndash; I just feel what we have been given a "negative" change in Governance. Power in Auckland will…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:58:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102825#post102825</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102825#post102825</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>So completely impotent then?</p></blockquote><p>In the government's proposal, yes. In Mikaere's proposal, the community boards are the source of Councillors.  Big difference.</p><blockquote><p>If biculturalism is the first step towards multiculturalism</p></blockquote><p>It isn't. Two different things.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:55:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102820#post102820</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102820#post102820</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>... Mayor of North Shore...</p><p>Craig... that is a very unkind thing to say about the leader of your community!</p></blockquote><p>.....and so it begins :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:37:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Roger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102818#post102818</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102818#post102818</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>... Mayor of North Shore...</p></blockquote><p>Craig... that is a very unkind thing to say about the leader of your community!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:29:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Roger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102817#post102817</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102817#post102817</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>That Jackie was Hyde's argument... 'three Maori councillors would be tokenistic, so let's have none, but we may allow them to have a little advisory committee that we can ignore'.</p><p>In my view we have a national governance structure that is based on biculturalism flowing from the treaty (in the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:27:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jackie Clark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102815#post102815</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102815#post102815</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>If biculturalism is the first step towards multiculturalism, and if biculturalism is served by Maori seats, then multiculturalism must be served by all seats being allocated to other ethnicities. </blockquote> But that <em>isn't</em>  what biculturalism is about, James. It is about recognising that we have a shared history, and that our…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:16:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Roger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102814#post102814</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102814#post102814</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p><strong>"community councils"</strong> &ndash; were proposed ... They wouldn't have regulatory powers, employ staff, or govern local authority organisations.</p></blockquote><p>Oh!  So completely impotent then?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:12:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102785#post102785</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102785#post102785</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						*sigh*  I have enormous respect for Pita Sharples, but the fucker does insist on making it difficult if he really thinks this is "legislative racism".  And while I was (and remain) dubious about the 'super-city' idea, I support anything that the cock-polisher pretending to be the Mayor of North Shore…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:59:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Graham</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102758#post102758</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102758#post102758</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						May I recommend Jane Clifton's column in this week's Listener. Nicely put, I thought.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 18:52:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hay</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102756#post102756</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102756#post102756</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Graeme, you probably need to read the submission to understand properly what it means.</p><blockquote><p>So instead of voting for who might be the best person for my community board, I vote for the person who will choose the mayor</p></blockquote><p>The Greens opposed having a mayor &ndash; one of the current…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 18:22:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102749#post102749</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102749#post102749</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>My source at Parliament came back regarding current levels of ethnic diversity on Auckland region's councils. This is gathered from news articles and personal statements, so is far from complete, but it looks roughly like this:</p><blockquote><p>Rodney District Council &ndash; 13 councillors<br />1 Maori</p><p>North Shore City Council &ndash; 16…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:16:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102721#post102721</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102721#post102721</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>If the commission decided on a smaller Auckland (metropolitian) council with executive powers, then:</p><p><em>"All the Community Council members form an electoral college, immediately after the local body elections, to vote for the members of the Auckland Metropolitan Council." (on pg 27)</em></p><p>The Greens also proposed two Maori Community Councils,…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:20:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hay</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102712#post102712</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102712#post102712</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Kiaora to Mikaere's proposal.  </p><p>The Green Party, in  <a href="http://www.royalcommission.govt.nz/rccms.nsf/0/CC2573E80010C73BCC25743200833186?open" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">its submission to the RC</a>, made a similar suggestion. If the commission decided on a smaller Auckland (metropolitian) council with executive powers, then:</p><p>__"All the Community Council members form an electoral college, immediately after the local body elections, to vote for the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 14:41:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Roger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102702#post102702</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102702#post102702</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>James...</p><p>Well actually that was easy!  Toronto has a Mayor (elected at large) and 44 councillors (from 44 wards) for a population of 2.5 million or 1:55,600</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 14:07:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102698#post102698</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102698#post102698</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Richard Florida has it nicely here</p></blockquote><p>__As housing starts and housing prices rose, so did tax revenues, and a major capital-spending boom occurred throughout the Greater Phoenix area. Arizona State University built a new downtown Phoenix campus, and the city expanded its convention center and constructed a 20-mile light-rail system…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 14:02:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Roger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102697#post102697</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102697#post102697</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Roger: how do the representation stats (1:70K) compare to some of those other places to which Auckland's been compared, e.g. Toronto?</p></blockquote><p>James... I don't have North American numbers.  A year or so I got interested and tracked down the Australian numbers so I had those at hand, but it is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:58:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Graham</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102679#post102679</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102679#post102679</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>will the auckland tail wag the New Zealand dog? hope not as 3/4 of nzers dont live there!</p></blockquote><p>Actually only 66% of NZers don't live here and that's changing every day.</p><p>The Auckland as a nation-state within NZ is a red herring.</p><p>What I don't get is why a perceived…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:12:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Littlewood*</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102653#post102653</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102653#post102653</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Rich of Obs &amp; Graeme:</p><p>Doh. Yeah meant Maori Party MPs. </p><p>Actually, I don't accept my own argument. Bart's right. You just end up with a bunch of tokens. Guess this shows why I'm not a wonk. Mikaere, u=champ.</p><p>Roger: how do the representation stats (1:70K) compare to some of those…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:27:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102638#post102638</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102638#post102638</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>He did do well, but I think this is a little harsh on Nick Smith. He was asked a supplementary question (so without notice) about an apparent inconsistency with a statement he'd made to NZPA supposedly saying the opposite.</p></blockquote><p>Graeme, I think it reasonable to expect Smith would have thoroughly…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:45:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102637#post102637</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102637#post102637</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>He did well yesterday when Smith was flat out evading a direct question from Mallard re the ACC Chair.</p></blockquote><p>He did do well, but I think this is a little harsh on Nick Smith. He was asked a supplementary question (so without notice) about an apparent inconsistency with a statement…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:40:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102635#post102635</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102635#post102635</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p><em>Isn't he shaping up well.</em></p><p>Well, he certainly thinks so :)</p></blockquote><p>Lockwood's now in a tricky position trying to get Minister's to answer questions but not having to judge the quality of the answer. I hope he manages it. He did well yesterday when Smith was flat out evading a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:26:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102634#post102634</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102634#post102634</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I did note that the PM said there would be a Select Committee process around all this on b this morning
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:22:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>FletcherB</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102632#post102632</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102632#post102632</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"Interesting to describe Christine Fletcher as left-ish, given she is a former National MP."</p><p>Ok, you got me there....    But compared to Banks...</p><p>Shall we just say Christine and Mat are sane-ish, and split the sane vote?  :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:12:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102631#post102631</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102631#post102631</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Eh? You mean all the MPs who are Maori are in Maori seats? There are plenty that aren't: Georgina Te Heu Heu? Meteria Turei? Parekura Horomia?</p></blockquote><p>I understood him to mean all Māori <em>Party</em>  MPs were MPs in Māori electorates, which is true.</p><p>I would note, however, that Parekura Horomia…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:05:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jake Pollock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102629#post102629</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102629#post102629</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Here's a question for those of you with more knowledge/time to check Wikipedia: are there any other cities *of a similar population size and geographic area* which we can compare this set-up to? Most of the comparisons I've seen have been to places like Sydney (5 million in the urban…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:01:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102628#post102628</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102628#post102628</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Gay seats. Transport seats. Music seats.</p></blockquote><p>That brings some odd images to mind.</p><p>Seriously that's an extreme version of the discussion and not really helpful. You don't need to go to extremes. And if you can get benefit from a partial measure the fact that an extreme measure might be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:59:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102625#post102625</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102625#post102625</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Mikaere, I like your ideas and would subscribe to your newsletter but fear that would breach Emma's new moderation bot... </p><p>I particularly like the wards-as-Local-Boards with direct Council representation model, and could even handle a smaller number of (proportionally voted) at-large members under that model to work as "independent directors".…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:53:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102622#post102622</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102622#post102622</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Aren't all Maori MPs in Maori electorate seats?</p></blockquote><p>Eh? You mean all the MPs who are Maori are in Maori seats? There are plenty that aren't: Georgina Te Heu Heu? Meteria Turei? Parekura Horomia?</p><p>But I do think that James has a point on "community of interest seats". I think…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:43:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>simon g</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102620#post102620</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102620#post102620</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And how history may judge her, two words</p><p>Winston Peters</p></blockquote><p>That's like saying history judges FDR in one word: Yalta.</p><p>There are several pretty big volumes of history to read before you get to that chapter. History may be written by the winners, but it certainly shouldn't be written by…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:41:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102619#post102619</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102619#post102619</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>If biculturalism is the first step towards multiculturalism, and if biculturalism is served by Maori seats, then multiculturalism must be served by all seats being allocated to other ethnicities.<br />But why stop there? Surely, culture is larger than ethnicity. Gay seats. Transport seats. Music seats.</p></blockquote><p>I thought we covered this…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:37:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mikaere Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102618#post102618</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102618#post102618</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Mikaere, if we want a bi-cultural governance structure (and I know only enough about traditional Maori models to know that it's something we should at least try) it's not going to be achieved by dumping three Maori into a sea of, very likely, white men. They'll be tied into the…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:31:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102617#post102617</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102617#post102617</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Aren't all Maori MPs in Maori electorate seats? Which means it couldn't survive without 'em.</p></blockquote><p>Why? All the Maori electorate voters would have to go somewhere. Who's to say what what happen in Northland (or Gisborne, at least once Hormoia is gone) if the electorate demographics (and boundaries) changed because…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:30:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102616#post102616</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102616#post102616</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>One could also argue that the Treaty doesn't apply to local government</p></blockquote><p>One could. One would look silly though.</p><blockquote><p>And how history may judge her, two words</p><p>Winston Peters</p><p>Which I admit was an uncharacteristic slip but really came across as someone who would do almost anything to cling to…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:27:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Littlewood*</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102615#post102615</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102615#post102615</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Bart</p><p>Aren't all Maori MPs in Maori electorate seats? Which means it couldn't survive without 'em.</p><p>If biculturalism is the first step towards multiculturalism, and if biculturalism is served by Maori seats, then multiculturalism must be served by all seats being allocated to other ethnicities. </p><p>But why stop there? Surely,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:25:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Raymond A Francis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102612#post102612</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102612#post102612</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Hilary and Sofie</p><p>A couple of points on Helen's tribute time and the mean National digs</p><p>Might I remind you of her behaviour when Don Brash made his last speech, disgraceful and ungracious</p><p>Two wrongs don't make a right but lets not make a mole hill into a mountain</p><p>And…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:01:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102611#post102611</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102611#post102611</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Mikaere you said</p><blockquote><p>we can't get to multiculturalism (even if this was possible or desired) without first implementing bi-culturalism.</p></blockquote><p>Are you sure we can't get to multiculturalism directly. It would seem sad to me to think that we can't recognise the values/needs/responsibilities of all parts of our culture at the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:01:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Corin H</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102610#post102610</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102610#post102610</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>What I'd like to know ... is why all these list members of Parliament, who were elected at-large and support proportional representation in Parliament, are now speaking out against a proposal to bring that sort of election to Auckland...</p></blockquote><p>Er, because the proposed Auckland system is not proportional representation?</p><p>It…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:43:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102609#post102609</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102609#post102609</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Like Paul said: the time for consultation is over.</p></blockquote><p>Jose,just speaking to JK  on BFM has got him to agree, "NO IDEA" what it will cost.No consultation with Maori. No reason why it must be done by 2010 and did a fine job in asking.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:35:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102608#post102608</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102608#post102608</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Much of the media comment has been mean spirited or even minimal</p><p>Not just the media either.Last night National MP's chose to try one last dig (which I found deplorable) which made me turn off the channel.</p></blockquote><p>Hey, it's still early days &ndash; she's not even 60. Let's not begrudge…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:32:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102607#post102607</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102607#post102607</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The thing is, when it comes to setting up new institutions these days &ndash; and do you want me to rant a little about the European Parliament? No? Didn't think so &ndash; democracy and representation are too often seen as the things that get in the way of good management.…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:25:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Roger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102606#post102606</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102606#post102606</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>James... </p><p>Like I have said I find the continual parroting that our councils are small and fragmented, and argument that so clearly flies in the face of all the facts, really depressing.  As I said yesterday Melbourne has 29 odd councils and a State government and they seem to do…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:20:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102605#post102605</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102605#post102605</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Isn't he shaping up well.</p></blockquote><p>Well, he certainly thinks so :)</p><blockquote><p>Much of the media comment has been mean spirited or even minimal</p></blockquote><p>Not just the media either.Last night National MP's chose to try one last dig (which I found deplorable) which made me turn off the channel.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:07:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hilary Stace</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102602#post102602</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102602#post102602</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Regarding Auckland, and New Zealand. Could we have a bit of a tribute time for local MP and long time Prime Minister Helen Clark somewhere. She has been a political leader for most of my adult life and was elected in one of those great transition and new intake years…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 08:56:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Littlewood*</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102601#post102601</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102601#post102601</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Roger: holy fuck.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 08:47:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Littlewood*</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102600#post102600</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102600#post102600</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Mikaere: Adoring yr comment that we've done mono-rule to death. It's hard to disagree with that.</p><p>As a former (and I hope repeat) Maori list Green candidate, how would you say our communities (both local and nation-wide) would benefit from entrenched Maori representation?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 08:44:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Roger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102596#post102596</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102596#post102596</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Ooppss (wrong line on the spreadsheet)... that of course should have read:</p><blockquote><p>And...</p><p>City Councils &ndash; People per councillor<br />Brisbane &ndash; 36,635<br />Gold Coast &ndash; 33,171<br />Old Auckland City &ndash; 21,525<br />Old North Shore City &ndash; 13,456<br />Wellington City &ndash; 12,560<br />Sydney &ndash; 16,880<br />Darwin &ndash; 5,487<br />Melbourne &ndash; 7,466…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 08:36:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102592#post102592</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102592#post102592</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>. . . in The House and the Speaker is doing a great job of trying to see a way through for Pita . . .</p></blockquote><p>Isn't he shaping up well. Must be those delicate <a href="http://media.nzherald.co.nz/webcontent/image/gif/toon55.gif" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">hands</a>, just made for locating the finest nuance in Standing Orders.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 23:44:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102590#post102590</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102590#post102590</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Awesome discussion. Just sayin'.</p><p>We made a good TV show too.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 23:15:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102586#post102586</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102586#post102586</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>He was speaking as Minister of Maori Affairs when he attacked the government's decision on the Auckland council seats. He said so.</blockquote> Plus also said that because of this, was able to have ongoing negotiations which should be revealed soon. Not that I think it will be good for Maori…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:52:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>simon g</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102582#post102582</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102582#post102582</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						He was speaking as Minister of Maori Affairs when he attacked the government's decision on the Auckland council seats. He said so.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:23:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102580#post102580</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102580#post102580</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Can anyone explain how he doesn't have to resign, especially if he backs up his rhetoric when he votes on the issue in Parliament?</blockquote> As a Minister of Maori Affairs, he has some duty to respond as such but that is deemed a National view but as Co Leader of…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 21:47:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102573#post102573</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102573#post102573</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I don't think being a list MP logically means you support PR? Just because you were elected through a system doesn't mean you agree with it. (Although Irish republicans struggled with this for many years..)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:48:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102572#post102572</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102572#post102572</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Interesting to describe Christine Fletcher as left-ish, given she is a former National MP.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:46:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102570#post102570</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102570#post102570</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Doh. Hide audio &ndash; 8mins30.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:38:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102569#post102569</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102569#post102569</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>something along the lines of:<br />"well, it puts us down with the Indians, Chinese and Samoans..."</p></blockquote><p>Only Sharples did not actually say that.  </p><p>Here he is on RNZ (<a href="http://podcast.radionz.co.nz/mnr/mnr-20090408-0712-Sharples_says_Maori_let_down_by_Auckland_reform-048.mp3" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">1.4MB</a>, 4mins) responding to the preceding interview with Rodney Hide (<a href="http://podcast.radionz.co.nz/mnr/mnr-20090408-0708-Hide_declares_bold_new_era_for_Auckland-048.mp3" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">3MB</a>, mins):</p><blockquote><p>"He has lumped us with the Indians and the Chinese…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:37:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>simon g</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102568#post102568</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102568#post102568</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Why is Pita Sharples still the Minister for Maori Affairs? Or maybe, why did he take the job in the first place?</p><p>As I understand it, Ministers are responsible for their portfolios. All the "agree to disagree" stuff is about issues outside their portfolios. The Minister for Maori Affairs must…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:35:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102567#post102567</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102567#post102567</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Um, FPP is not MMP.</p></blockquote><p>Quite right. A fact that I'm surprised eludes some members of Parliament.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:19:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102566#post102566</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102566#post102566</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>"well, it puts us down with the Indians, Chinese and Samoans..."</p><p>I though that was pretty offensive.</p></blockquote><p>And from a former race conciliator, no less.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:07:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102565#post102565</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102565#post102565</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'm glad others have picked up the point that Maori representation is about honouring the Treaty of Waitangi, not about "ethnicity".</p></blockquote><p>Well, Pita Sharples did a poor job of making his case this morning on RNZ. He said something along the lines of:</p><p>"well, it puts us down with the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:00:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102564#post102564</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102564#post102564</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>a proposal to bring that sort of election to Auckland</p></blockquote><p>Um, FPP is not MMP.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:57:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102562#post102562</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102562#post102562</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>What I'd like to know ... is why all these list members of Parliament, who were elected at-large and support proportional representation in Parliament, are now speaking out against a proposal to bring that sort of election to Auckland...</p><p>[p.s. I just switched over to the Parliament channel]</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:52:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jan Farr</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102561#post102561</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102561#post102561</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						re Fletcher and McCarten &ndash; Sorry Mark &ndash; should have read right through before I leapt in.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:43:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jan Farr</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102560#post102560</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102560#post102560</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Yep... that's how he got in the first time.... I've forgotten who the candidates were, but there were two nearly equal quality left-ish candidates, who nicely split the left vote so that Banksy got in. Then, he pissed everybody off, and Hubbard won on the "anyone but banksy" vote...</p></blockquote><p>Wasn't…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:36:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102554#post102554</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102554#post102554</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						To put it in more corporate terms that Key might understand, there's a big difference between being a member of an advisory board, being a director elected at large, and being a director nominated to protect the interest of a major shareholder. Those shareholders don't rely on at-large election to…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:04:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jan Farr</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102553#post102553</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102553#post102553</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						re Don Christie's changing Auck. shoreline map &ndash; it seems to me that it turns from a rottweiler to a very silly poodle?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:01:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102552#post102552</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102552#post102552</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Don't know if anyone already linked to this at Scoop, but <a href="http://img.scoop.co.nz/media/audio/0904/key.on.maori.ak.gov.mp3" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here's John Key</a> today betraying his impoverished understanding of both governance and the Treaty relationship.  Not the best audio, and it's a few minutes long.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:58:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102551#post102551</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102551#post102551</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I don't disagree with Mr O'Sullivan's conclusions about the way the three seats were constituted, but I'd be interested in hearing what Ngati Whatua, Tainui, and other mana whenua had to say.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:51:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102550#post102550</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102550#post102550</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm just saying the right to representation comes directly from the Treaty without needing to make any sophisticated arguments. Same not so true in Australia, Canada, etc.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:48:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102549#post102549</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102549#post102549</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Oh. Then he's ignoring one of the key arguments, surely.</p></blockquote><p>I wouldn't say 'ignoring', actually. He's making a pretty sophisticated case for the right to representation being tied to manua whenua status as opposed to race, a point which has been raised in this very thread. He's not saying that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:46:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102548#post102548</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/discussion-regarding-auckland/?p=102548#post102548</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Oh. Then he's ignoring one of the key arguments, surely.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:38:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
