<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Cracker: Mix Your Members</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>FletcherB</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130962#post130962</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130962#post130962</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"Probably the Yandall Sisters. They were on just about everything, back then."</p><p>That was my guess too....for much the same reason... I just didnt pipe up because I knew I mis-remembered the name....  "Randell Sisters" was sticking in my mind, but I knew it was wrong...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sept 2009 12:51:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Parks</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130896#post130896</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130896#post130896</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm not concerned at our readiness for "full proportionality" in itself. I'm purely interested in the point &ndash; made by others here and that I'm taking for granted &ndash; that overseas experience demonstrates more instability with low/no threshold. If that is not the case, then I'm all for removing the…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sept 2009 14:44:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130891#post130891</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130891#post130891</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Steve, you go a little further here with why stability is so important that it requires dropping proportionality for minorities (under the threshold, whatever that is). You say the stability provided by a threshold leads to a chance for parties to implement their policies and make them work, and this…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sept 2009 09:20:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Hosking</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130876#post130876</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130876#post130876</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Indeed. Any guesses on who the local session singers are?</p></blockquote><p>Probably the Yandall Sisters. They were on just about everything, back then.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sept 2009 20:13:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Parks</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130875#post130875</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130875#post130875</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Seems good. So proportionality would be maintained over the remaining seats? I'm in favour then. But I'm still in favour of reducing the threshold.</p><p>(Now, I've got beer to drink and rugby to watch.)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sept 2009 20:02:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130872#post130872</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130872#post130872</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>... "every electorate seat" won by a party that gets less than 5% of the vote would be an overhang, I meant.</p></blockquote><p>There's no reason to draft a hypothetical electoral law like that. You could treat electorate seats won by parties not crossing the threshold the same as we currently…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sept 2009 19:23:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Parks</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130868#post130868</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130868#post130868</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						... "every electorate seat" won by a party that gets less than 5% of the vote would be an overhang, I meant.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sept 2009 17:18:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Parks</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130867#post130867</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130867#post130867</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>So far the only argument I've heard against the lowest practical threshold of 0.8% (unless we raise the number of MPs) that isn't "I don't like minorities having any say", has been "It gives stability".</p><p>I'm surprised this is considered such a powerful argument.</p></blockquote><p>We have a party-based, representative democracy…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sept 2009 17:12:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>dcnbwz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130856#post130856</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130856#post130856</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>my take. If it's mentioned then they're worried. As most major parties have been for quite a while.</p><p>MMP is the best thing that's happened to nz for ages in terms of democracy. It's still been hijacked along the way, but it's way better than fpp.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sept 2009 09:39:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ben Austin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130844#post130844</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130844#post130844</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						In a happy coincidence I recently read something relevant to this – “Electoral Systems: A Comparative Introduction” by David M. Farrell.  It is a pretty quick read but worth it if you want a brief introduction to the research on the 4-5 (I forget) general classes of electoral system, alongside…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 22:49:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130837#post130837</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130837#post130837</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Ben, that is an unfair reduction.</p></blockquote><p>I'll give you that in light of your follow up that it's <em>disproportionate</em>  say for minorities you don't like. I wouldn't like that, nor do I like disproportionate say for majorities, and it wouldn't be how it works in MMP (because of the P).…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 20:44:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130835#post130835</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130835#post130835</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Nah, it'd be because it's just a hot-n-sexy song. It's called 'Fire' for goodness sake.</p><p>In that sense the Pointer Sisters' version is the definitive one, just like Patti Smith's 'Because the Night' is, more so than Bruce's.</p></blockquote><p>Probably showing my age here, but there's a great mix tape (or…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 20:32:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130828#post130828</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130828#post130828</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It's actually a Springsteen song...I don't usually associate his music with "hot-n-sexy"...but maybe that's because I'm a guy?</p></blockquote><p>Nah, it'd be because it's just a hot-n-sexy song. It's <em>called</em> 'Fire' for goodness sake.</p><p>In that sense the Pointer Sisters' version is the definitive one, just like Patti Smith's 'Because the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 18:43:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130825#post130825</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130825#post130825</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'd lower the threshold (say 4%) and abolish the stupid electorate rule whereby the threshold magically disappears for your party. Rodney gets to bring Rodney and nobody else, ditto Anderton, and that way we also get rid of those silly shenanigans like Wellington central for Prebble back in the day…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 18:31:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130824#post130824</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130824#post130824</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Nevertheless, I think I'm pretty much in agreement with Keir over the disquiet over the "list" aspect to MMP.</p></blockquote><p>Sorry, I never really got people who complained that list MPs are "undemocratic" because the list is supposedly drawn up in the proverbial smoky back room by a cabal of party…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 18:26:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130823#post130823</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130823#post130823</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I don't like minorities having any say</p></blockquote><p>Ben, that is an unfair reduction. My objection is twofold: that they have a disproportionate say, and that their numerical size is often correlated with their unpleasant beliefs. You may feel that one or both of those claims is factually untrue, but it…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 18:21:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130820#post130820</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130820#post130820</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>soz, read "only argument <em>against</em> against the lowest practical threshold..." <br />Doh</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 17:54:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130819#post130819</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130819#post130819</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>So far the only argument I've heard for the lowest practical threshold of 0.8% (unless we raise the number of MPs) that isn't "I don't like minorities having any say", has been "It gives stability". </p><p>I'm surprised this is considered such a powerful argument. It's not like the instability means…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 17:53:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Parks</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130818#post130818</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130818#post130818</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I haven't made up my mind on the 'Baden-Wurttemberg' version of MMP, but it's seems worth looking into.</p><p>Nevertheless, I think I'm pretty much in agreement with Keir over the disquiet over the "list" aspect to MMP. The list is one way in which the party indicates what sort of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 17:46:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130814#post130814</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130814#post130814</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Combines the proportionality of MMP with a simple means for the voters to write the party list.</p></blockquote><p>Wouldn't it just put in candidates who ran in marginals?</p><p>Which isn't really very useful. </p><p>Admittedly I think all these attempts to muck around with the internal workings of political parties are daft:…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 17:26:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130803#post130803</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130803#post130803</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>(Italy comes to mind, though Giovanni would know 10 times as much as I do &ndash; I think we discussed this some months ago and he said that it was stable in terms of not having frequent elections, but the makeup of the government frequently shifted as parties ended up…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 16:42:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>jeremy gray</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130800#post130800</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130800#post130800</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>In the interests of empiricism, I wrote the NZ MMP system in mathematica and had a play around.</p><p>With no cut off, Bill and Ben would have had one seat in 2008, as would the Kiwi party.</p><p>The Destiny party would have had one seat in 2005.</p><p>We would have…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 16:33:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Edwards</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130779#post130779</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130779#post130779</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Why does a threshold need to be in percentage terms anyway? We could set it 60,000 votes, and let that number mean whatever it means in any election, or set it at a number of MPs. Do the divvying up of seats as though there was no threshold, and all…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 15:33:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130778#post130778</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130778#post130778</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It's actually a Springsteen song</p></blockquote><p>So true! I forgot that. But they're doing The Pointer Sisters' rendition in that Avis ad, definitely.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 15:32:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130772#post130772</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130772#post130772</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I think we discussed this some months ago and he said that it was stable in terms of not having frequent elections</p></blockquote><p>Really? I was under the impression that they'd had, on average, about one p.a. since the war.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 15:17:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gabor Toth</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130754#post130754</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130754#post130754</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>That Avis ad in turn reminds me of the awful sexist Hertz ad from the '80s. It used "To know him is to love him", but with "To know Hertz is to love Hertz" and ghastly soft-focus footage of female counter staff pouting at the camera.</p></blockquote><p>To Hertz's credit, they…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 14:17:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rik</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130748#post130748</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130748#post130748</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I finally realise, nearly 30 years after the fact, that they're doing a car-rental variant of The Pointer Sisters' 'Fire'. Which is an oddly hot-n-sexy song to use.</p></blockquote><p>It's actually a Springsteen song...I don't usually associate his music with "hot-n-sexy"...but maybe that's because I'm a guy?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 13:50:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130747#post130747</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130747#post130747</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I think 5% is too high, I'd be happy for it to drop, but not below 2.5%. That would give three MPs, maybe four.</p></blockquote><p>Which strikes me as a good number because it basically rules out, in very tight votes, one MP &ndash; representing 0.8% of the population &ndash; being…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 13:49:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130746#post130746</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130746#post130746</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Ben, I don't think the threshold is there to keep minorities or weirdos out. A bunch of them get in anyway. As David pointed out, it's a stability question.</p><p>The experience of some European countries with low thresholds (Italy comes to mind, though Giovanni would know 10 times as much…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 13:42:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130741#post130741</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130741#post130741</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Okay, to take the argument a bit further, the main reason that parties developed is as a way of ensuring stability &mdash; to make sure that an executive has a decent stab at implementing its policies and a decent chance of making them work.  Remember how many prime ministers we…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 13:16:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130740#post130740</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130740#post130740</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Heh! I think that "ganging up to seize power" might be an emotive word for 'democracy' (in that the majority calls the shots).</p></blockquote><p>Yes, but it's an even better word for tyranny. Of the <em>minority</em>. Which is much worse than the (still bad) tyranny of the majority .</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 13:07:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130739#post130739</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130739#post130739</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I also don't buy the whole "small parties hold the whole thing to ransom" argument, period. If power is only held by a very small majority, and minor parties can take advantage by saying they will break off, then what is actually so unjust about that? The larger party must…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 13:05:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130738#post130738</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130738#post130738</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I think the word "extreme" is an emotive word for "minority".</p></blockquote><p>Heh!  I think that "ganging up to seize power" might be an emotive word for 'democracy' (in that the majority calls the shots).</p><p>I take your points... it's a complicated issue.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 13:02:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130734#post130734</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130734#post130734</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>My main point wasn't the n-1 argument. Although it probably seemed that it was.</p><p>My point was that 115,000 voters was an awfully big number (generally entitled to 6 seats in Parliament) to be telling their views shouldn't be heard in Parliament.</p><p>Why does a threshold need to be in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 12:55:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130729#post130729</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130729#post130729</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Re: extremist groups getting in on less than 5%, seriously, if 0.8% of the population wish to be represented by a crazy, then fair do's to 'em.</p></blockquote><p>Ditto to the idea of Indians being represented by an Indian. I think the word "extreme" is an emotive word for "minority". I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 12:50:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130728#post130728</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130728#post130728</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>if 0.8% of the population wish to be represented by a crazy, then fair do's to 'em.</p></blockquote><p>Started to respond to this &mdash; but George makes my point (and with far more brevity).</p><p>It's worth noting that you <em>always</em> have a threshold in a representative democracy that's dictated by the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 12:50:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130727#post130727</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130727#post130727</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And it's not ARBITRARY, in the sense that it has a point.</p><p>Eg, the speed limit is an arbitrary number &mdash; 104, or 95 kph would do about as well as the current value &mdash; but the purpose is not arbitrary.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 12:45:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130724#post130724</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130724#post130724</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Or to be slightly less flippant in answering that fallacious appeal to slippery slopes and how many hairs make a beard and shit: if you accept the idea of a threshold at all, then having chosen a number n there will be a number n-1 where the group comprising it…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 12:43:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130723#post130723</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130723#post130723</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>If 120,000 people want a party represented in Parliament, they get it, but if 115,000 voters want a different party they're extremists?</p></blockquote><p>And therein lies the problem with any line in the sand.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 12:43:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Damian Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130722#post130722</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130722#post130722</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>If 120,000 people want a party represented in Parliament, they get it, but if 115,000 voters want a different party they're extremists?</p></blockquote><p>Any threshold is arbitrary. Actually, the whole thing is pretty arbitrary really isn't it? You know... life. </p><p>Isn't the only reason the tail gets to wag the dog…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 12:41:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130721#post130721</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130721#post130721</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>If 120,000 people want a party represented in Parliament, they get it, but if 115,000 voters want a different party they're extremists?</p></blockquote><p>Yes.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 12:41:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130718#post130718</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130718#post130718</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'll match Stephen's opinion that we should keep the five percent threshold, and raise him the idea that we should get rid of the exception for parties that win a seat. The threshold keeps out extremists, and fuck me I'm so completely in favour of that.</p></blockquote><p>I'm considering writing on…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 12:38:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Damian Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130717#post130717</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130717#post130717</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>so it wouldn't be ACT, United Future, and the Progressives so much as Rodney Hide, Peter Dunne, and Jim Anderton, all on their not-very-powerful lonesomes.</p></blockquote><p>Um, Dunne and Anderton are already, aren't they? Which really just makes this is an argument to get rid of the Act party... and I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 12:37:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130716#post130716</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130716#post130716</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The large number of 1-2% parties can all put through their favoured policies, often despite popular objection.</p></blockquote><p>So maybe we could try around 3-4%? Enough to knock out the crazies, but would have got rid of, e.g., the NZ First/ACT imbalance last election.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 12:36:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130714#post130714</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130714#post130714</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>if 0.8% of the population wish to be represented by a crazy, then fair do's to 'em.</p></blockquote><p>it's amazing how many of the arguments boil down to simply But People We Don't Like Will Be in Parliament and Form Governments!</p><p>However, there is an argument for some kind of threshold,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 12:34:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Damian Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130713#post130713</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130713#post130713</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The show was pre-recorded and they did a retake. The clip only turned up on TV later as a blooper.</p></blockquote><p>Andrew &ndash; Yeah, I saw Jase at the Qantas awards and he said he'd seen it, and told me the same story, although he said he wasn't completely sure whether…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 12:34:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Heather Gaye</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130711#post130711</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130711#post130711</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>My understanding of the system is that it shouldn't bias towards the big parties &ndash; you still get a party vote and they still get the same number of seats as under the current system.</p></blockquote><p>OH, sorry, I getcha now. Thanks for clarification, that sounds way more sensible.</p><p>Re: extremist…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 12:26:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130709#post130709</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130709#post130709</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<em>Awesome</em>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 12:25:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130705#post130705</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130705#post130705</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>This certificate confirms that</em><br />   <strong>LUCY STEWART</strong><br />has demonstrated competence in <br /><strong>Internet Telepathy Level One</strong><br />by means of practical demonstration.</p><p>Given this day</p><p><em>etc etc</em></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 12:19:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130703#post130703</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130703#post130703</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I've spent <em>way</em> too much time looking at different electoral systems &mdash; and one of my conclusions is that I'm a big fan of the Baden-Württemberg approach.  Combines the proportionality of MMP with a simple means for the voters to write the party list.  Counting isn't a problem: we have…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 12:13:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130702#post130702</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130702#post130702</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Actually, ACT, UF and Progressive all have electorates, so they'd survive.</p></blockquote><p>Turning on my internet telepathy for a moment: I think Stephen means that we'd lose the associated MPs, so it wouldn't be ACT, United Future, and the Progressives so much as Rodney Hide, Peter Dunne, and Jim Anderton, all…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 12:12:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130701#post130701</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130701#post130701</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>One can imagine various extremist groups mustering 0.8% as well, and then using the financial and admin base of an MP to bootstrap a larger organisation.</p></blockquote><p>I can also imagine a lot of non-extremist groups doing it too. But that does depend on your definition of extreme. Under FPP, the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 12:09:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130699#post130699</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130699#post130699</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Actually, ACT, UF and Progressive all have electorates, so they'd survive.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 11:59:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130697#post130697</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130697#post130697</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The 5% threshold has some things going for it.</p><p><a href="http://www.elections.org.nz/news/2008-election-official-results.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Here's the last election results</a>. If we gave seats for getting 0.8% of the vote (ie 1/120th) you can see that the Bill and Ben party would be in striking distance. One can imagine various extremist groups mustering 0.8% as well,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 11:53:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130695#post130695</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130695#post130695</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I finally realise, nearly 30 years after the fact, that they're doing a car-rental variant of The Pointer Sisters' 'Fire'. Which is an oddly hot-n-sexy song to use.</p></blockquote><p>Indeed. Any guesses on who the local session singers are?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 11:48:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130692#post130692</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130692#post130692</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>At first read that sounded quite good. Second read, I don't really see how it counts as MMP at all. It's effectively a variation on FPP system &ndash; &amp; would weight parliament in favour of the two biggest parties.</p></blockquote><p>I think it means that parliament would end up with the same…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 11:46:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>jeremy gray</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130691#post130691</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130691#post130691</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>My understanding of the system is that it shouldn't bias towards the big parties &ndash; you still get a party vote and they still get the same number of seats as under the current system. </p><p>It is just who gets chosen that would change &ndash; eg the orange candidate may…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 11:38:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Heather Gaye</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130690#post130690</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130690#post130690</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>We could use the MMP method from the German state of Baden-Wurttemberg and proposed but turned down for Scotland. These guys don't have party lists &ndash; the list seats are instead filled by the candidates who lost their electorates by the smallest margin.</p></blockquote><p>At first read that sounded quite good.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 11:32:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Brenda Leeuwenberg</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130689#post130689</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130689#post130689</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>That news footage of the protestors is pretty potent stuff! </p><p>For those that are interested, the Merata Mita documentary Patu! covers the 'mass civil disobedience' that took place in 1981 around this tour. The doco is <a href="http://www.nzonscreen.com/title/patu-1983 " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">available in full here</a> and also <a href="http://www.nzonscreen.com/title/try-revolution-2006 " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Try Revolution</a> which looks at the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 11:29:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andrew llewellyn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130688#post130688</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130688#post130688</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>. The implication was, dear businessman, that the Hertz ladies would look after you.</p></blockquote><p>I knew one of those Hertz ladies from university (shock horreur, they were models!).</p><p>And sadly, she didn't. But probly for the best.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 11:28:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130687#post130687</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130687#post130687</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>"To know Hertz is to love Hertz"</p></blockquote><p>I always thought that ad had a strange masochistic air about it.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 11:27:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>jeremy gray</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130684#post130684</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130684#post130684</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Well, FPP would be a nightmare, but maybe we can sort out MMP a bit.</p><p>We could use the MMP method from the German state of Baden-Wurttemberg and proposed but turned down for Scotland. These guys don't have party lists &ndash; the list seats are instead filled by the candidates…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 11:17:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JLM</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130683#post130683</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130683#post130683</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						"Decent into chaos" &ndash; I like it!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 11:10:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Robyn Gallagher</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130680#post130680</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130680#post130680</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Talk of a referendum on MMP is interesting. Just last night I saw the 1996 documentary "Someone Else's Country", which looks at the economic policies of the Lange/Palmer/Moore Labour government and the Bolger National government (and concludes there wasn't much difference between them).</p><p>The film ends with the MMP referendums…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 11:05:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Robyn Gallagher</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130676#post130676</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130676#post130676</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						That Avis ad in turn reminds me of the awful sexist Hertz ad from the '80s. It used "To know him is to love him", but with "To know Hertz is to love Hertz" and ghastly soft-focus footage of female counter staff pouting at the camera. The implication was, dear…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 10:54:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Heather Gaye</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130674#post130674</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130674#post130674</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						...just looking around the net, it appears that there wasn't any promise of a referendum, but a lot of people believe there was. Found this article by muriel newman saying that what was actually promised was a  <a href="http://www.nzcpr.com/weekly152.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">"full review", held in 2001</a>. An earlier article by don brash says the…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 10:53:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Heather Gaye</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130666#post130666</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130666#post130666</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It was never promised when MMP was voted in all those years ago, that we’d have a rethink a decade or so down the track,</p></blockquote><p>Actually, I'm pretty sure it was. I remember part of the public information campaign was that in the event of a change, there would be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 10:32:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130662#post130662</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130662#post130662</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>a fantastic Avis ad from 1981</p></blockquote><p>I finally realise, nearly 30 years after the fact, that they're doing a car-rental variant of The Pointer Sisters' 'Fire'. Which is an oddly hot-n-sexy song to use.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 10:26:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andrew gunn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130657#post130657</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130657#post130657</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						These old TV clips are choice. I have just watched Ep 1 with the famous Thingee eye-popping. Like with Kennedy's assassination and the crowning of Lorraine Downes, many people can remember what they were doing when this happened. But here's the spooky thing: it never actually aired on the Son…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 10:13:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130655#post130655</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130655#post130655</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Does this mean they shouldn't get to vote on electoral change? No, but as I said to one young man at the Backbencher on Wednesday, nor is occasionally voting to change or retain electoral law a right, or even a good thing.</p></blockquote><p>I thought it was a good thing last…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 10:07:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130654#post130654</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130654#post130654</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Legal Beagle already has a thread on this.</p><p>I'm inclined to also doubt the motives of National, but I always do, on pretty much everything. That doesn't mean that a referendum is a bad idea, just that it ought to be done properly.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 10:05:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130653#post130653</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-mix-your-members/?p=130653#post130653</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sept 2009 10:05:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
