Posts by dad4justice
Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First
-
Hey hold on a bit here, as describing Judith Collins as a bully and a fool is hardly fair. I do not agree with her out bursts concerning the deadbeat dad tag and child support, as she fails to recognise the fact that a lot of fathers flee to Australia before they come a unfortunate client of the unfair Kangaroo court. However the spiteful Children’s Commissioner wanted me incarcerated in jail. Just to put some balance back into the discussion. I have received many letters from the Children’s Commissioner Office since year 2002, regarding my personal family case. Last year Dr Cindy Kiro made a complaint to police about me, as she found an email I sent her offensive. CIB detectives after an investigation and interview thankfully did not charge me with anything, and I was relieved to finally get this information Christmas 2006. They made me sweat on this for 6 months! I hope that is not a standard procedure from a Children’s Commissioner and remember well, my emails and letters to her were from a genuine concerned father worried about his two estranged daughters. Why else would I have bothered. I agree with Judith on her analysis of the Commissioner, as she is so prejudice she cannot understand the word balance. To say that she has “lost the plot” it is the understatement of the century. For the benefit of the children of New Zealand d4j thinks it would be appropriate that she has an immediate lobotomy to change her bias and totally deluded attitude because kids do like being with both a mum and dad. Oh dear dear - where else in the world do Amazons rule?
-
Graeme,
Glad to hear you oppose this bill, however what I do find rather disturbing is the idea mooted to various women ‘s groups by the Principal Family Court judge Boshier - that police will soon have the powers to issue on the spot protection orders.It is conceivable that I would link this development and timing to the passing of this bill .
Where is my nurofen .
Have a good day mate - cheers -
as I have a more than a full interruption of most aspects of criminal and family law.
I meant to say interpretation of most aspects blah , blah ,
that word interruption just won't go away as it best describes this abysmal atttempt at trying to address the issues of child abuse which we lead the world at .
-
Oh yes just one more thing , how come female assaults male charge does not exist in New Zealand ? Oh yes silly me, the pendulum theory does not exist as the radical feminists have smashed the clock.
-
I am not prepared to argue with you Graeme on this matter, however you will be proved wrong, as many parents will become the respondent of protection orders under this bill.
This will be a fact and I will be proved correct in the future and please do not insult my intelligence, as I have a more than a full interruption of most aspects of criminal and family law.
I finish with stating that it is a sad day for New Zealand when 85% of the population have had the right to use discipline to set boundaries taken away by a nanny state government .
Democracy sucks in kiwiland .
-
"Anyone who thinks a court is going to put in place a protection order against a parent because they smacked their kid a little bit hard needs to sit down and have a cup of tea and stop scare-mongering."
Police have said they will treat smacking a child under rules of the DV Act, which clearly states any kind of abuse , including emotional is an offense. Police will have no alternative but to issue a PO.
-
Infact Graeme my QC lawyer and Detective Senior friends would like to know how you know this, as they can't find the legal precedence you base your mis-directed opinion on ?
-
Thank you Graeme ,as police and the legal fraternity I have talked to would strongly disagree with you , but you would know more about things than them ?
I will let them know, as they are totally confused because they thought they would charge under the DV act, which makes the perpetrator of any form of violence subject to a protection order .
What Act are you referring to , as I must go and buy one and swat up on it so I can help the flood of bewildered parents that this bill will effect?
-
Can anybody answer my question as many Barristers cannot ?? – when a parent is arrested for smacking a child will they be subjected to the same provisions contained in a protection order under the DV Act , which by the way states that no application’s for a protection order may be made against a child ? Let’s hope kids don’t bash mummy eh?
What a lot of dysfunctional legal rot this bill is, talk about shifting the dark area. I await your answer to my question with much anticipation .
-
Just imagine if the government had shown the public the enthusiasm for strengthening the family rather than passing legislation that will hand police another quagmire of bad family law. Already most lawyers will not have a bar of the confusing family law. It is a great pity that government does not recognise recent studies, which show that paternal influences do have an effect upon child socio-emotional development. However, if government were really genuine about the plight of our vulnerable children they would have voted at United Nations level to focus on the preservation of the family unit which is the paramount consideration for most correct thinking countries .It is another sad day for the children and parents of New Zealand .