OnPoint by Keith Ng

Read Post

OnPoint: Brownlee: Now 93.5% fact-free!

58 Responses

First ←Older Page 1 2 3 Newer→ Last

  • Jeremy Eade,

    "a wiki-styled website which fact-checked politicians and promoted transparency by hosting source data."

    I'll have one of those.

    Great reporting Keith.

    auckland • Since Mar 2008 • 1112 posts Report

  • Stephen Judd,

    Yeah, about that website: I'm prepared to donate money or labour, or just a spare ethernet cable.

    Wellington • Since Nov 2006 • 3122 posts Report

  • Rich of Observationz,

    The pseudo-market thing for electricity is dumb, especially when over 80% plus of the suppliers to the "market" are simply different arms of the state.

    It would be perfectly possible to develop a model that calculates the optimum usage of generating capacity to minimise CO2 emissions and/or energy cost while maintaining reliable supply. More effecient resource allocation, and if they gave it a (read-only, natch) web interface you could log in and watch it working.

    Back in Wellington • Since Nov 2006 • 5550 posts Report

  • James Green,

    It would be perfectly possible to develop a model that calculates the optimum usage of generating capacity to minimise CO2 emissions and/or energy cost while maintaining reliable supply.

    Wash your mouth out yo :)
    Back in the ol' skool NZED days they also used to account for wear and tear on the system. Each 24 hours, a designated generator (machine not corporation) used to be run at variable speed (higher wear) to match supply fluctuations. Now each company has a generator doing that. They also used to avoid overclocking their plan. And with the network management not detached from generation, they could also maintain the grid in a more stable fashion, rather than having links near maxed out, or close to collapse...

    Limerick, Ireland • Since Nov 2006 • 703 posts Report

  • slarty,

    Thanks Keith, you always help to nudge my despair with journalism in a more positive direction.

    A fact-checking web site would be a massive drain: as an alternative, what about a Bullshitometer for key (!) politicians, agencies and... journalists?

    We could have a ballot to pick 8 important mouths or mouthpieces, then look for volunteers to fact check their blathering.

    I nominate the leaders of each party plus Police as a starting point (only because I'm becoming increasingly disillusioned with the transparency of plod over the last year or so).

    I'd be happy to help build a system for calculating a bullshit%. We could then just run a series of gauges on a site. It might even be valid in a qualitative sense!

    Since Nov 2006 • 290 posts Report

  • Keith Ng,

    Actually, what would be super helpful is if you could let me know if you come across a significant statement that has the waff of bullshit. I can take it from there...

    Auckland • Since Nov 2006 • 543 posts Report

  • Kyle Matthews,

    It'll be just like the bat signal shining over Gotham's night sky.

    A big turd picture, posted on PAS.

    Since Nov 2006 • 6243 posts Report

  • Rochelle Hume,

    Awesome post Keith.

    Makes me so happy to see good journalism in NZ!

    It'll be just like the bat signal shining over Gotham's night sky.

    A big turd picture, posted on PAS.

    I'll be looking out for it..!!

    Warkworth • Since Sep 2007 • 34 posts Report

First ←Older Page 1 2 3 Newer→ Last

Post your response…

This topic is closed.